As explained in the video and repeated in the text below the video, I've explained the changes in a way that makes sense to me, in my opinion TfL are developing a habit of renumbering routes but presenting them as route changes, 13/82 and 16/332 are examples, for whatever reason, something simple - extending the 549 from South Woodford to Whipps Cross, replacing parts of the W12 has been turned into something complicated by calling it the W14 as well (it would make more sense to use the W12 number for the revised 549). In reality it's the W12 that no longer exists, as very little of the original route will remain unchanged. I've tried to unscramble the egg as best I can.
549 will be withdrawn not extended
As explained in the video and repeated in the text below the video, I've explained the changes in a way that makes sense to me, in my opinion TfL are developing a habit of renumbering routes but presenting them as route changes, 13/82 and 16/332 are examples, for whatever reason, something simple - extending the 549 from South Woodford to Whipps Cross, replacing parts of the W12 has been turned into something complicated by calling it the W14 as well (it would make more sense to use the W12 number for the revised 549).
In reality it's the W12 that no longer exists, as very little of the original route will remain unchanged.
I've tried to unscramble the egg as best I can.