The Great Debate: THE STORYTELLING OF SCIENCE (OFFICIAL) - (Part 2/2)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 вер 2024
  • Link to Part 1 (of 2): • The Great Debate: THE ...
    Join the Origins Project at ASU for the final night in the Origins Stories weekend, focused on the science of storytelling and the storytelling of science. The Storytelling of Science will feature a panel of esteemed scientists, public intellectuals, and award-winning writers including well-known science educator Bill Nye, astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson, evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins, theoretical physicist Brian Greene, Science Friday's Ira Flatow, popular science fiction writer Neal Stephenson, executive director of the World Science Festival Tracy Day, and Origins Project director Lawrence Krauss as they discuss the stories behind cutting edge science from the origin of the universe to a discussion of exciting technologies that will change our future. They will demonstrate how to convey the excitement of science and the importance helping promote a public understanding of science. The panel discussion is sure to be a provocative and entertaining finale to our Origins Stories events. We look forward to seeing you there!
    VIdeo by Black Chalk Productions.
    Get the most recent updates from the Origins Project by following us on Facebook /ASUOriginsProject and Twitter @asuORIGINS. Contact origins.project@asu.eduwith questions.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 6 тис.

  • @vaivs7903
    @vaivs7903 4 роки тому +1360

    "But Neil, they outnumber you 1 to 7"
    "Then it's an even fight"

    • @rushstu3445
      @rushstu3445 4 роки тому +23

      lmfaaaooo

    • @prathambansal8951
      @prathambansal8951 3 роки тому +30

      Idk,not judging anyone, but i don't like people(Neil degrasse) screaming or being aggressive to prove or implement their point.
      And another thing, he doesn't even listen and think about what other people are saying he just have a preconceived answer to everything,which he just don't want to question.

    • @DeusEx.Machina
      @DeusEx.Machina 3 роки тому +92

      Pratham Bansal he was right though. NASA started and was funded solely because the U.S. wanted to step up to the Soviet Union and prove that capitalism is better than communism. He was angry that they were naive about that FACT. If you watch carefully, you’d see Lawrence agreeing with him too.

    • @johnjeremiejacinto3228
      @johnjeremiejacinto3228 3 роки тому +33

      @@prathambansal8951 he is not wrong tho

    • @syedbaqir2687
      @syedbaqir2687 3 роки тому +44

      so many snow flakes here. Neil is king.

  • @bimoanindito9040
    @bimoanindito9040 4 роки тому +564

    Tyson: "now I'm going to be silent"
    Lawrence: "no you're not"

    • @aaronrajadurai1167
      @aaronrajadurai1167 3 роки тому +24

      neil to himself: "nope i'm not"

    • @dfmrh12345
      @dfmrh12345 3 роки тому +9

      @@aaronrajadurai1167 “damnit how’d he know “

    • @d3scribe130
      @d3scribe130 2 роки тому +1

      LMAOOAOAOA he knows him fr

    • @kingjosephrbidenjriii5820
      @kingjosephrbidenjriii5820 Рік тому

      They're both asshats. And idiots. Listen to their nonsense...somebody ask them how the astroNOTS got thru the van Allen radiation belts. Aka the firmament. Hint hint hint. They didnt

  • @AliceDiableaux
    @AliceDiableaux 8 років тому +1542

    "Science is hard, but it's worth it." Well said, Richard.

    • @SangeevSelvaratnam
      @SangeevSelvaratnam 8 років тому +32

      I just read this as he was saying it!!!

    • @DJM.I.A.
      @DJM.I.A. 6 років тому +2

      AliceDiableaux Because ya gotta learn math, which is even harder

    • @rd264
      @rd264 5 років тому +1

      worth has zero to do with effort-- the value one gets out of an effort has nothing to do with it "worth". I get a great buzz out of an old TV show-- the only "hard" part is finding the remote so I can turn on the TV.or walking my mutt. and he gets value out of a cheap and easy approach to a simple bush of little value, I assure you.

    • @joch8954
      @joch8954 5 років тому +2

      @@SangeevSelvaratnam me too lol! i was like wow that was a big coincidence

    • @sdsfgsty
      @sdsfgsty 4 роки тому +2

      I don't think he's very social. That's why he only says cliches. " science is hard but it ..."

  • @mrinmoygohain125
    @mrinmoygohain125 2 роки тому +345

    When Neil degrasse tyson sits quiet, he's actually recharging himself to explode. Love this guy.

    • @dannystefanovski5513
      @dannystefanovski5513 8 місяців тому +1

      Mars is a wondering star.
      And no body can leave earth ..
      No one has ever gone thru the impenetrable firmament..
      More lies

    • @mattfrenden1000
      @mattfrenden1000 8 місяців тому

      Not funny@@dannystefanovski5513

    • @InnerLuminosity
      @InnerLuminosity 5 місяців тому +1

      He loves himself too

  • @twingate2
    @twingate2 10 років тому +2176

    "You can´t argue with the facts."
    "Watch me."
    Now that´s an attitude.

    • @BillyG.O.A.T
      @BillyG.O.A.T 5 років тому +87

      Right, I kind of want to see a comic book based around Neil Tyson, with that as his catchphrase.

    • @richardtolbert2745
      @richardtolbert2745 5 років тому +67

      Yes, because he has made an effort to learn all the facts and has the conviction and courage to make them known

    • @TheReferrer72
      @TheReferrer72 5 років тому +38

      Brilliant Neil was on fire.

    • @malekmannai9445
      @malekmannai9445 5 років тому +8

      Don't believe me just watch 😎

    • @lesliekilgore648
      @lesliekilgore648 4 роки тому +31

      or like Dawkins said about respecting others' opinions. "No you damn well don't have to respect their opinion." :> but I'd add a caveat. 'even if you don't respect their opinion, you've got to listen to it long enough to refute and disprove it.' :> which I DO think NDT does need to hush, calm down, sit back, DON'T JUMP UP LIKE A COMMON STREET BRAWLER... and have a calmer... MUCH CALMER... discussion.

  • @minhle3795
    @minhle3795 5 років тому +1848

    This should have been named: "The Great Debate: Neil degrasse Tyson vs everyone"

    • @yaredtadesse8470
      @yaredtadesse8470 4 роки тому +10

      lol

    • @niranjanpunnokkil8177
      @niranjanpunnokkil8177 4 роки тому +11

      😂😂😂

    • @dj311292
      @dj311292 4 роки тому +111

      Hahaha
      Very True. People find Neil's interruptions very annoying, but on the contrary, I believe that is what brought the humour and entertainment in this event. It just makes people experiencing this the first time, realise how FUN and VAST science is and you can be a part of it and contribute to the community.
      For Science!

    • @xehP
      @xehP 4 роки тому +37

      Because he talks a lot of shit, yeah he makes sense (sometimes) but he only talks in laymen and my god he’s up there with the greatest minds and he’s still talking in idiot language, he’s talking to the crowd not the qualified scientist.

    • @gurikhinda6728
      @gurikhinda6728 4 роки тому +3

      Agreed

  • @hypernova9879
    @hypernova9879 7 років тому +527

    Neil and Kraus are the two reasons i decided to do a physics degree at the age of 32, Brilliant men.

    • @apachemimi9762
      @apachemimi9762 6 років тому +16

      Hypernova Collapsar ...dude YOU ROCK!!

    • @tjug0f3m
      @tjug0f3m 5 років тому +24

      I’m 34 and just decided to look into it as well... it’s never too late!

    • @MrAnperm
      @MrAnperm 5 років тому +29

      Thanks for writing that. I'm just starting an engineering degree at 35.

    • @jackmedlock5888
      @jackmedlock5888 4 роки тому +19

      Hypernova I just got accepted into North Carolina State University where I’m also getting a degree in physics! “Science is hard but it’s worth it.” - Richard Dawkins

    • @AL-X-Under
      @AL-X-Under 4 роки тому +3

      @@tjug0f3m yes but is very hard for someone whose maths are weak or am i wrong?

  • @varuna6089
    @varuna6089 3 роки тому +524

    "I think fun and entertainment are overrated". Prof. Richard Dawkins
    You gotta love this man🤣🤣🤣

  • @Mimizu666
    @Mimizu666 8 років тому +740

    "I had fun once. It was awful." - Richard Dawkins.

  • @johnnynosealoka
    @johnnynosealoka 4 роки тому +572

    For my whole life I have been in my wheelchair. Today I stood up to turn the volume up

    • @udaikumar1782
      @udaikumar1782 4 роки тому +11

      Very deep👍👍👍

    • @Krystallen
      @Krystallen 4 роки тому +8

      Legendary quote man

    • @Ali-co3xp
      @Ali-co3xp 3 роки тому +6

      Benefit thief

    • @noxzy69
      @noxzy69 3 роки тому +10

      And then Tyson started shouting and you went straight back into a state of paralysis?

    • @_kahini
      @_kahini 3 роки тому

      😂😂😂

  • @19billdong96
    @19billdong96 9 років тому +923

    And some people say scientists are boring...

    • @kamranbegakafr3ak
      @kamranbegakafr3ak 6 років тому +7

      Not everyone but Richard is

    • @pareshpanchal91
      @pareshpanchal91 6 років тому +63

      @@kamranbegakafr3ak it comes across like that but he just doesn't give a shit what people think of him, just says it like it is

    • @kamranbegakafr3ak
      @kamranbegakafr3ak 6 років тому +3

      yeah but he is boring i enjoy watching other but he is the most boring

    • @tengentopka727
      @tengentopka727 6 років тому +20

      Kamran Beg yeah just like you.

    • @kamranbegakafr3ak
      @kamranbegakafr3ak 6 років тому +8

      @@tengentopka727 hah I myself think I'm boring thanks for confirming

  • @TovmasianDiana
    @TovmasianDiana 2 роки тому +432

    The best UA-cam video for me.
    8 years ago I watched it at school, and it inspired me to go into science.
    And now I almost got my PhD in physics thanks to these guys.

    • @michaelblazejewski6121
      @michaelblazejewski6121 2 роки тому +9

      Awesome

    • @atanuchakraborty8155
      @atanuchakraborty8155 2 роки тому +8

      Can't pronounce your name but crossing the boundaries I can extend my love respect to you young mind. Let your journey continue with the amusement astonishment and continuous association with wonder.

    • @atanuchakraborty8155
      @atanuchakraborty8155 2 роки тому +1

      @AMB my emotional concurrence with you. Let me share my part of overwhelming joy even a person been confined with basic arithmetic geometry and excel or Autocad types of software professionally for my bread & butter but I do communicate others with the jewels of science and scientific temper. Try to enjoy the reading or anykind of association with the know how.

    • @d3scribe130
      @d3scribe130 2 роки тому +2

      this comment made my day

    • @elfambino4066
      @elfambino4066 2 роки тому +2

      👏👏👏

  • @cassandra9581
    @cassandra9581 8 років тому +1685

    "Am I just like .... thinking? Or am I just like... thinking that I'm thinking?" That Bill Nye stoner thought lol

    • @MrRomeohustler
      @MrRomeohustler 8 років тому +11

      lol

    • @macona.fortune3143
      @macona.fortune3143 8 років тому +131

      Thats why bill nye is so awesome. Hes not only very well-educated and smart but hes also socially intelligent. He just spits out creative quick-witted jokes when everyone else is thinking logically and seriously about something.
      I laughed so hard when tyson compared learning algebra to learning a language like chinese "If you want to study chinese it looks completely intractable" and bill nye just throws in "it looks like greek". Great sense of humor.

    • @nagud8833
      @nagud8833 8 років тому +7

      I had just passed that part of the video and had to go back to catch the joke. xD Bill Nye is great @Free Dom

    • @svader9680
      @svader9680 8 років тому +32

      Even old uptight Dawkins can't resist a chuckle or two in this setting/

    • @theolima8929
      @theolima8929 5 років тому +3

      it was a surprising GREAT imitation

  • @KristinaRomani
    @KristinaRomani Рік тому +160

    Love these fun moments
    6:14 head move
    7:48 it just because
    13:25 oh wow
    17:26 fun overrated
    21:46 opinion
    30:00 my generation
    31:33 no brother Neil
    33:48 do you know
    34:54 gotta sit

  • @svader9680
    @svader9680 8 років тому +618

    I think Lawrence did an excellent job moderating. Everyone seemed like they were having fun. Even Richard lol.

    • @JoseRodriguezBaby
      @JoseRodriguezBaby 7 років тому +1

      good point

    • @joshy2boss931
      @joshy2boss931 7 років тому +18

      The host was annoying and trying way too hard to be funny and each time it was at someone else's expense, primarily Dr. Tysons.

    • @JuicyLeek
      @JuicyLeek 6 років тому +47

      Pretty sure Neil and Stephen are good friends in real life, which is why they don't mind acting that way towards each other.

    • @tyynymyy7770
      @tyynymyy7770 6 років тому +47

      joshy2 boss+ They are friends.
      Not to mention Tyson has a tendency to dominate discussions and it is hard for others have their say.

    • @higgsboson9509
      @higgsboson9509 5 років тому +30

      @@joshy2boss931 All these scientists you see are friends. They dig at each other all the time. I can understand how that could be taken the wrong way.

  • @K.J.734
    @K.J.734 3 роки тому +379

    Tyson & Nye are two natural comedians as well as being brilliant. Just imagine if all your teachers were the same.

    • @mazidahmukhtar6071
      @mazidahmukhtar6071 Рік тому +3

      They were nemesis in tbbt. They r the energy😂

    • @Jay-ln7ov
      @Jay-ln7ov 10 місяців тому

      Both extremely narcissistic

    • @brandonrose4388
      @brandonrose4388 10 місяців тому

      Nye is an actor. Lol he is full of more shit than passion. Tyson on the other hand is great .

    • @Parmenides7
      @Parmenides7 9 місяців тому

      Guy in white shirt is shitty comedian. Just made the show horrible

    • @dead.inside.585
      @dead.inside.585 9 місяців тому

      @@Jay-ln7ov You know who are narcissists? Stupid people. Tyson and Nye are not stupid people.

  • @dylanf6091
    @dylanf6091 8 років тому +675

    I swear if you gave Neil all the time in the world to debate, he would use every second forever lol

    • @omegasrevenge
      @omegasrevenge 8 років тому +75

      +Dylan F (DJBluff22) And we would love every single microsecond of it.

    • @khairowensullivan7489
      @khairowensullivan7489 8 років тому +15

      +abschussrampe just reading all these positive comments make me soooooo happy...I'm an ex Muslim atheist...

    • @Nemesis-oo9ss
      @Nemesis-oo9ss 8 років тому +8

      +abschussrampe every single femtosecond

    • @bilk6504
      @bilk6504 8 років тому +5

      +khairowensullivan but if you love Sience you don't need to be atheist

    • @chunkyduff
      @chunkyduff 8 років тому

      +Bilind samank But it helps. ;)

  • @soleterraandluna8828
    @soleterraandluna8828 4 роки тому +254

    Tyson: "now I'm going to be silent"
    Lawrence: "no you're not"
    Tyson less then a minute of being silent... "YES! BUT! BUT! I AGREE! BUT! LISTEN!"

    • @toni4729
      @toni4729 3 роки тому +1

      Not for long.😅🤣

  • @malcolmbryant
    @malcolmbryant 8 років тому +611

    Tyson and Nye would be the greatest comedy double act!

    • @aerhearts
      @aerhearts 8 років тому +18

      +melancholiac - I agree Neil and Nye would make a great team, teaching and entertaining at the same time!

    • @soumyajitmaitra8958
      @soumyajitmaitra8958 5 років тому +6

      Laurel and hardy

    • @gregnyg6191
      @gregnyg6191 4 роки тому +2

      A comedy fraud act!!!!😂

    • @jeremiahdssdentmorgan3341
      @jeremiahdssdentmorgan3341 4 роки тому +2

      More pseudo-babble bullshit from Neil degasbag with Bill Nye the non-science guy added in!!! Shill's for the system of lies ruling the world!!!

    • @lesliekilgore648
      @lesliekilgore648 4 роки тому +2

      wow, a mechanical engineer with Boeing is not a science guy? cool. I guess everybody who builds and designs the actual applications of scientific discovery is a non-science person.

  • @heldersimoes1124
    @heldersimoes1124 Рік тому +81

    It's unbelievable how we're all so lucky to be alive in a world where science is this entertaining and I'm SO HERE FOR IT

  • @96nikecha
    @96nikecha 9 років тому +352

    "No you damn well haven't got to respect their opinion" [21:52]
    - Richard Dawkins
    I am gonna use that on so many idiots on the internet. THANK YOU RICHARD, you are a hero of reason!

    • @TheRedRuin
      @TheRedRuin 9 років тому +4

      That's right and it goes for him as well.
      That he is called Captain Logic by his sycophants is funny. Here's why: he said his Oxbridge college has more Nobel Peace Prizes than 'muslims'; but he failed to realize 'muslims' have infinitely more Nobel Peace Prizes than Richard Dawkins.
      Enjoy that one sycophant.
      Oh and there's just as many psychotic Muslims as psychotic Westerners, Richard Dawkins does have a mental health issue from his 'public' school upbringing, chances of him dealing with that are minuscule.

    • @SockbatReplicaOne
      @SockbatReplicaOne 9 років тому +20

      Faesen "Oh and there's just as many psychotic Muslims as psychotic Westerners"
      Yup we're taking our shoes off at the airport right now because of the Westboro Baptists.

    • @96nikecha
      @96nikecha 9 років тому +8

      Faesen It is obvious that you are trying to participate in this stupid internet phenomena known as "trolling". It is either that or you are breaking records for stupidity.

    • @TheRedRuin
      @TheRedRuin 9 років тому

      John McKay So you don't even have basic mathematics, science and logic: well for free zero equals nothing and 1 equals absolute certainty.
      Absolutely anything is an infinite compared to zero. It's why the Big Bang happened, maybe you can try and rap your mind around from one particle came the entire universe.
      Zero is awful, having no Nobel prizes and having the nerve to lambast others, oh and to bring his college into disrepute as well. Dawkins reminds me of a gobby kid who'll go and get his brothers if his bullying doesn't work and someone splats him. Of course all around the world there there are those who are as cowardly as he is, and in fact much worse.
      I graduated from a top 10 UK university, the last thing I'd do is leech off others achievements, though I know people like yourself that's how you operate.

    • @TajimaMunenori
      @TajimaMunenori 9 років тому +1

      And you're in the military?
      Well I guess you send a wacko to kill a wacko.

  • @DominicLondon
    @DominicLondon 9 років тому +510

    Tyson was great. His point about politics and science was unbelievably true.

    • @greatbritain5355
      @greatbritain5355 5 років тому +4

      Dominic London. Wrong.

    • @khaduongnguyen3105
      @khaduongnguyen3105 4 роки тому +58

      @@greatbritain5355 3 year later and that's what you choose to comment, not even explain why. You sure live up to your name lol.

    • @mredik5209
      @mredik5209 4 роки тому +7

      That was the most hilarious moment of this debate. I love Neil for that

    • @pubexploit6782
      @pubexploit6782 4 роки тому +3

      @@greatbritain5355 Dumbass

    • @toothless2250
      @toothless2250 4 роки тому +3

      @@greatbritain5355 You wrong
      *Aight i won the debate*

  • @JumpingJiraffe
    @JumpingJiraffe 9 років тому +102

    A lot of people state that these scientists don't like eachother or are arguing. They're not arguing, they're debating. They all respect eachother. In fact, Nye and Tyson are friends. They disagree on something's but they respect and look up to one another

    • @higgsboson9509
      @higgsboson9509 5 років тому +3

      Exactly. A lot of people seem to confuse "fighting" with "debating."

    • @patrickcompton1483
      @patrickcompton1483 4 роки тому +4

      Tyson definitely has a real problem with Brian Greene though, astrophysics and string theory don't blend well and he takes it way too personally. If you watch him when Greene is talking he doesn't laugh and looks disgruntled the whole time. It's unfortunate because they're both such informative scientists.

    • @letlhogonolomotlhose9617
      @letlhogonolomotlhose9617 4 роки тому

      @@patrickcompton1483 That's true

  • @Michael-go9hm
    @Michael-go9hm Рік тому +115

    Gotta love Neil, his energy, passion, charisma, jokes, knowledge such a all rounded guy!

    • @myself3209
      @myself3209 Рік тому +13

      He really loves himself too

    • @InnerLuminosity
      @InnerLuminosity Рік тому +3

      Neil agrees

    • @republikadugave420
      @republikadugave420 Рік тому +3

      He is a bafooooon

    • @22RedEyeJedi22
      @22RedEyeJedi22 10 місяців тому +2

      He showed his true colour at 13:25... He is not interested in a conversation if he is not the authority. He is very smart but also a narcissist.

    • @shaquillebryantakwembounou9077
      @shaquillebryantakwembounou9077 8 місяців тому

      ​@@22RedEyeJedi22 humm i have seen that part and i dont se any think as narcissim, i think that you should more learn about what you say(narcissim) and more understand the relation and dynamics among those people before judging them. "Most people judge men by their looks, a few judge them by their reality, and very few judge them by truth." - Seneca

  • @douaemesbahi985
    @douaemesbahi985 4 роки тому +270

    "I think fun and entertainment are overrated"
    "That's cause you're British, that's cause you're British"

  • @JohnSmith-pj5qg
    @JohnSmith-pj5qg 8 років тому +209

    "Am I, like, thinking? Or am I just thinking that I'm thinking?" *takes a puff*
    Classic

  • @bilpeterson4090
    @bilpeterson4090 3 роки тому +36

    If I hit the mega millions , I’d pay for this group to gather up like this at least 4 times a year and do this

  • @EnlightenedEyes11
    @EnlightenedEyes11 3 роки тому +60

    "The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it."
    - Neil Degrasse Tyson

    • @primeminister1040
      @primeminister1040 3 роки тому +1

      What do you mean "true"?

    • @EnlightenedEyes11
      @EnlightenedEyes11 3 роки тому +2

      @@primeminister1040
      in accordance with fact or reality. Accurate or exact.

    • @primeminister1040
      @primeminister1040 3 роки тому +1

      @@EnlightenedEyes11 what is fact and what is reality? Must the fact be observable? Is reality only what we can see?

    • @EnlightenedEyes11
      @EnlightenedEyes11 3 роки тому +2

      @@primeminister1040 the world or the state of things as they actually exist, as opposed to an idealistic or notional idea of them.

    • @22RedEyeJedi22
      @22RedEyeJedi22 10 місяців тому

      He should revisit that statement and use it against himself...

  • @gotcha987
    @gotcha987 8 років тому +92

    Richard: -"I think fun and entertainment are overrated" and the face he did the following second just seems like the meme. Hilarious.

  • @xGOOFYJELLYFISH
    @xGOOFYJELLYFISH 9 років тому +506

    i love how all these guys can sit down and debate and argue about things and have fun, but they don't really really get mad at each other. That's the great thing about rational people, they can argue on views about things and are willing to learn from each other and brush it off. religious people argue about things and take it personal and create wars.

    • @hamonryehd
      @hamonryehd 9 років тому +20

      +xGOOFYJELLYFISH that's emotional maturity, not rationalism. look at niel and his frequent outbursts and underhanded remarks.

    • @venkatchait007
      @venkatchait007 8 років тому +7

      +xGOOFYJELLYFISH if you really look into it, most wars were started for other reasons. Things like religion, etc are just used as an excuse so one group of people can exert power over another. I'm not a believer btw. With enough scientific, economic, societal advances we can probably eliminate war completely.

    • @daviddecker1787
      @daviddecker1787 8 років тому +2

      Nice generalizations there

    • @roo6492
      @roo6492 8 років тому +2

      +Yijuwarp Scientific evolution is profited through ward, economics are seek through war, and society advances are means of war. Wars are created to be right over other people and assume they are inferior to them. Religion helped to think they were chosen, better people. Look at the Vatican and their Holy Crusades, previously that Religion was into that too, after that too, and in between many religions did that. Anything that divides people in different ranks create wars. Like civil wars.

    • @lexgotham
      @lexgotham 8 років тому +8

      +xGOOFYJELLYFISH That's complete BS. It's not because they are rational that they get along but because they are part of the same group.
      Put christians together or muslims together or jewish together and they'll get along just the same.
      The same in politics or for any field for that matter.
      And don't forget that they are there to promote science (and not to ruin the show of their friend who happens to be the producer of the show).
      Have you ever seen a debate between a rationalist and a religious? Most of the time, it's the rationalist that tends to go nuts.
      You can express your dislike of religious people but you can't just invent some BS theory from thin air to do so.
      Your comment is uncalled for and is based on nothing but personal bias.

  • @joshsmith7692
    @joshsmith7692 5 років тому +285

    Love Neils passion. That's what we, at least in America need. We need the Bill Nye and NDGT type of scientists to light a fire about science in kids, as well as adults!

    • @kdmscience621
      @kdmscience621 3 роки тому +6

      Brian Greene & michio kaku too

    • @dohser805
      @dohser805 3 роки тому +1

      Michio kaku for sure Is up there

    • @gregmckay666
      @gregmckay666 3 роки тому +4

      It starts at home. There are only so many NDGT's and Bill's to go around. Parents have to start allowing their children to experiment and ask hard questions.

    • @supme7558
      @supme7558 3 роки тому

      Will your half right but no 1 needs to mimic Tyson and how rude he is And loud like A Neanderthal

    • @allisonchains113
      @allisonchains113 3 роки тому +2

      This was eight years ago, and since then, Neil was right. String Theory is obsolete. Many grants and funding-many many grants and funding-have done nothing but been a waste of money. Greene is still spewing string in argument for this theory when it is proven it can not answer anything. In this timeframe we have a new theory, as of 2014: Emergence Theory-E8-of Quantum Gravity. Garrett Lisi found the answers with mathematical theorem, and with that knowledge has started a group known as Quantum Gravity Research.

  • @mdah7090
    @mdah7090 4 роки тому +96

    Them: you’re outnumbered Neil!
    Neil: well you’re outmatched

  • @GRDwashere
    @GRDwashere 8 років тому +165

    I can't get enough of these guys.

  • @mayur8926
    @mayur8926 4 роки тому +80

    Why am I laughing in a science class for 45 minutes straight

  • @MrRenan7669
    @MrRenan7669 9 років тому +54

    30:55 A says" its a fact, you cant argue facts", Neil responds "watch me" lol

  • @whofuckinfarted
    @whofuckinfarted 3 роки тому +146

    I imagine Richard Dawkins narrating everything in his head like a nature program.

    • @user-nl2qk4up1u
      @user-nl2qk4up1u 3 роки тому +5

      Lol 🤣

    • @migduh
      @migduh Рік тому +14

      “The bombastic nature of these mammals to loudly propound their knowledge in a public gathering is a sort of human equivalent of the brilliant plumage of the male peacock.”

  • @akhenatten
    @akhenatten 8 років тому +434

    I have noticed that Neil can exist in two states. He is either uncomfortable and silent, or content and talking...and there is no in between. I like the guy, but if you watch he is either out-talking the entire group or sitting there looking horribly uncomfortable.

    • @politikal78
      @politikal78 8 років тому +78

      That means he's a good listener. You can't learn and think at the same time. He is listening to everyone. He only comments when he's asked or he disagrees.

    • @punkson
      @punkson 8 років тому +13

      +quest 757 I'd say that's certainly incorrect. In order to learn you do have to think because that is the process for progress. Certainly if you just didn't think when learning and just processed all the information as fact, that is why everyone thought the earth was the center of the universe for so long. In order to learn things have to be processed and so rationally thought about in order for progress to occur.

    •  8 років тому +9

      +quest 757 he did not "comment" he interrupted others.

    • @RalfOltmanns
      @RalfOltmanns 8 років тому +22

      But Lawrence Krauss did a very good job to moderate the whole debate. He really appears to be able to read Neil's mind and calm him down by rephrasing his thoughts in a slightly more moderate way.

    • @akhenatten
      @akhenatten 8 років тому +8

      Ralf Oltmanns
      He did. He's good at reading the subtle cues and keeping things civil.

  • @MarioCavett
    @MarioCavett 5 років тому +282

    I wish I could put the passion and drive of Neil Degrass Tyson into our government!

    • @brentbeepath7457
      @brentbeepath7457 4 роки тому +9

      It is possible but policies have to be created where educators have a stronger influence on the electoral collage so that any action they undertake will be based on objective truths

    • @mukonank783
      @mukonank783 4 роки тому

      i wish i could put it to my son

    • @firewithfire848
      @firewithfire848 3 роки тому +1

      @@brentbeepath7457 WOW...that doesn’t sound dehumanizing or fascist at all.

    • @supme7558
      @supme7558 3 роки тому

      HIs aggression make him look like a neanderthal

    • @MarioCavett
      @MarioCavett 3 роки тому

      @@brentbeepath7457 If education wasn't as corrupt as government that would be true.

  • @vkotis
    @vkotis 9 років тому +371

    That was way too short!

    • @higgsboson9509
      @higgsboson9509 6 років тому +3

      Right?! I think so too!!

    • @pareshpanchal91
      @pareshpanchal91 6 років тому +3

      There is a part 1 to this, this is part 2, I agree though that this part could have gone on for hours and hours

    • @BoschizBasus
      @BoschizBasus 5 років тому +4

      Where is part 3689??

    • @blackhatvisions
      @blackhatvisions 5 років тому

      That's not what she said

  • @jacobharris5894
    @jacobharris5894 3 роки тому +57

    I remember actually being in the crowd for this. It’s one of the best Origin’s lectures I’ve ever been to.

  • @thezzach
    @thezzach 5 років тому +148

    30:56
    "You can´t argue with the facts."
    "Watch me."
    Gotta love Neil.

  • @keshan8237
    @keshan8237 7 років тому +172

    The beef between lawrence and Neil is hilarious..

    • @alexwex123456789
      @alexwex123456789 4 роки тому +13

      keshan Krauss comes off as a bit of an ass. I say this even though I know how annoying Tyson can be

    • @zf5656
      @zf5656 4 роки тому +5

      @@alexwex123456789 Emotionally, they both have plenty of room to grow. And, I love you reply to the OP. I have no argument to it.

  • @RobinCould
    @RobinCould 9 років тому +184

    Richard is just sitting there like, "those bastards."

    • @sebinsuresh9656
      @sebinsuresh9656 8 років тому +53

      +Robin Could "I wonder if my tea and biscuits are ready."

    • @gogox1136
      @gogox1136 8 років тому +16

      +Sebin Puthenthara Suresh "Bloody hell,where is my turn mate"

    • @gogox1136
      @gogox1136 8 років тому

      +Joshua Gomez *when

    • @stanzag470
      @stanzag470 8 років тому +3

      +Joshua Gomez no. WHERE IS IT JOSH

    • @TraderTimmy
      @TraderTimmy 8 років тому +11

      +Robin Could
      I don't think he had any ill thoughts of his contemporaries at all. He was simply being the polite fellow he always is. and you know his mind is taking it all in and deeply contemplating all the while. That's the kind of man he is.

  • @PizzaTime15
    @PizzaTime15 Рік тому +78

    The way brian green run away at 33:53 and comes back at 34:00 is so comedic, and bill came to help to takedown neil and neil trying to escape 33:57 is even hilarious. even though these are very intelligent people, they still know how to be a goofy.

    • @Helmy___
      @Helmy___ Рік тому +6

      intelligent people tend to be goofy and funny..some are so funny that its hard to work with em..like literally..but its fun tho..

    • @ChromaticOnyxx
      @ChromaticOnyxx 10 місяців тому

      They tried to distract Bro .

  • @evangilchrestfilms
    @evangilchrestfilms 4 роки тому +66

    Neil thought he was on the jedi council sitting up there

  • @BluesBewitch
    @BluesBewitch 3 роки тому +19

    13:30 / 13:50 “like of wow”...“am I like thinking? Or am I thinking that I’m thinking?” (Pretends bong hit) He is such an icon!!! Nye is that guy

  • @Im-just-Stardust
    @Im-just-Stardust 9 років тому +561

    The best ... group ever. I been laughing so much

    • @rubenmartinez2994
      @rubenmartinez2994 6 років тому +2

      Yes yes, that's because they are all clowns!

    • @RC-sr4cs
      @RC-sr4cs 6 років тому +1

      Yeeeeeaaah...there’s the GROUP of scientists...THEN there’s the journalist

    • @MikkelGrumBovin
      @MikkelGrumBovin 6 років тому +1

      you so funny - you laugh so much -

    • @RetoniumOfficial
      @RetoniumOfficial 6 років тому +1

      113 now

    • @thattwodimensionalant4626
      @thattwodimensionalant4626 6 років тому

      Stay Primitive My Friend
      Please keep uploading man, we miss you :/

  • @natyboops
    @natyboops Рік тому +47

    This is like a rap battle but with scientists. Love it!🥰

  • @aeroscience9834
    @aeroscience9834 8 років тому +151

    I wish Richard Dawkins had joined in at about the 10 minute mark. I'd be interested to hear his views on how important math is to biology.

    • @nigelkirk274
      @nigelkirk274 8 років тому +5

      +Aeroscience DNA. Your body is an executed program read from the compiling softwares called RNA holoenzyme polymerase and mRNA. Understanding how DNA works, how chromosomes work, understanding the genome and mapping the genome, all of that uses math. DNA is no different than old 1s and Os, except each of the tiniest pieces are two bits instead of one.

    • @marceljones7940
      @marceljones7940 8 років тому +2

      +Nigel Kirk in a sense you are right, but unless your discipline is bioinformatics most maths you will encounter and have to apply is pretty basic (although you will encounter maths in some form in every branch of biology)

    • @whocareswho
      @whocareswho 8 років тому +5

      I would be very surprised if biologists on that level don't have a solid grasp on things like probability, which is part of mathematics.

    • @martinjensen8587
      @martinjensen8587 8 років тому +2

      +Marcel Jones That might be true for high school level biology, but at university the bachelors and masters in biology requires just as much math as many engineering studies.

    • @marceljones7940
      @marceljones7940 8 років тому +2

      Martin Jensen
      i have a masters degree in molecular biology and i really dont need much maths. certainly nothing advanced

  • @aysikl
    @aysikl 10 років тому +33

    learn algebra -nye
    ambition -tyson
    passion -krauss
    empathize -uranium yuri
    reiterate empathize switch to poetry -dawkins
    tell it so mom understands it -ira

    • @mookieoftheshire
      @mookieoftheshire 10 років тому

      trig and all the calculus classes are so much better ...

    • @mobcat40
      @mobcat40 10 років тому +14

      Mark Case Try doing calculus without algebra

    • @mookieoftheshire
      @mookieoftheshire 10 років тому

      mobcat40
      They were trying to inspire people. Fundamentals can be cool. Algebra isn't.

    • @JanLCn
      @JanLCn 10 років тому +6

      Mark Case Algebra isn't cool only because you don't know enough about algebra to judge whether it is cool or not

    • @mookieoftheshire
      @mookieoftheshire 10 років тому

      lol alright

  • @felipegonzalez8549
    @felipegonzalez8549 6 років тому +57

    Neil: talks...
    Then finishes his statement
    Lawrence: “wait I wanna...I wanna wait wait I wanna...explain about.....”
    Neil then talks over Lawrence haha

  • @swarupjyotibiswas2940
    @swarupjyotibiswas2940 3 роки тому +11

    Leonard and sheldon fighting in that science talk just pops in my mind😂😂

  • @XLTBlarg
    @XLTBlarg 8 років тому +12

    33:50 lol Brian Greene, Bill and Neil acting out a fight scene was the funniest thing ive ever seen.

  • @isenbert
    @isenbert 4 роки тому +85

    Neil: coughs
    Audience: applause!

    • @ssdivizion
      @ssdivizion 3 роки тому +5

      Тhis audience in large numbers contains semi-literate shallow people and heavy snobs for sure!

    • @Milky_Cum
      @Milky_Cum 3 роки тому +3

      Now
      Neil: coughs
      Audience: COVID POSITIVE!!!!

    • @Starcrossedslv
      @Starcrossedslv 3 роки тому +11

      @@ssdivizion you sound dumb as hell please calm down...

    • @ahmadjamalmughal47
      @ahmadjamalmughal47 3 роки тому +2

      @@Milky_Cum 🤣

  • @sabprogamer93
    @sabprogamer93 4 роки тому +51

    Can we just appreciate Biil’s humor for a moment.

  • @colby9945
    @colby9945 3 роки тому +79

    31:10 Neil: "Everybody mentioned there book its time for me to mention mine."
    Lawrence: "I dont think anyone mentioned there book actually" 😂😂😂

    • @gerrytushh
      @gerrytushh 3 роки тому +4

      Note: "their" and "there" are very different words. How I wish you could learn the difference 😉

    • @colby9945
      @colby9945 3 роки тому +3

      @@gerrytushh You must have a pathetic life to be bothered by such things

    • @gerrytushh
      @gerrytushh 3 роки тому +1

      @@colby9945 am not pathetic at all. As a teacher, I get paid for precisely pointing out that kind of thing 🤣 Very important 😂

    • @acemxe8472
      @acemxe8472 3 роки тому

      @@gerrytushh Lol got ‘em.

    • @gerrytushh
      @gerrytushh 3 роки тому +1

      @@acemxe8472 😂some basic grammar never hurt anyone 😂

  • @visaAVTS
    @visaAVTS 9 років тому +207

    Neil is great on so many levels but he got way too loud and he should at least let others to speak then debunk them.Richard as always calm and collective

    • @universologist
      @universologist 9 років тому +6

      visa422978
      Problem with Richard is he projects himself as an expert on waaaaaaay too many subjects. And because of his success in teaching evolution, people interpret his other subject views as viable. He needs to stop talking about religion, philosophy, etc. because he has no credentials.

    • @Mz-ci8wg
      @Mz-ci8wg 9 років тому +2

      i think you´re one hot lady, even though you don´t give a damn about what i think. Neil....he just loves the sound of his own voice...but he´s one cool customer.

    • @catastrophucked
      @catastrophucked 9 років тому +7

      ***** Geez, you sound more like some chick, who is judging a man who doesn't meet her standards, which is as equally annoying as what you just said. Neil DeGrasse Tyson is just another scientist who is very passionate about what he says, and the fact of the matter, is that war does indeed fuel scientific progress and not the need for adventure in the government. Brian Green and Laurence Krauss were both wrong and were about to go on a huge rant about it. If you can't handle the fact that Neil gets passionate over misleading thoughts about what fuels science then you just need to get the fuck over it or get the fuck out.

    • @alexanderli3352
      @alexanderli3352 9 років тому

      ***** Neil is actually the one with the open mind on the matter. The other scientists are claiming that X has to be like Y. Neil is saying that we have no evidence that X even exists.

    • @catastrophucked
      @catastrophucked 9 років тому +1

      *****
      Because you used the phrase "turn off" which makes it sound like you're judging his suitability as a mate, not as a scientist, which is something a chick would be prone to doing. I assumed you're a chick because your username is "May Been" and I don't know many males named "May". The man got passionate, you insulted him for it, I don't like people who make disparaging comments toward others who are unafraid to express their opinions with some gusto.

  • @jaronepaul66
    @jaronepaul66 5 років тому +32

    Man I wish this was a 4 hour long program. We barely see them have science talks in one stage. Hats off to all the scientist!

  • @PraveenKumar-jb5wk
    @PraveenKumar-jb5wk 5 років тому +54

    "You cant argue with the facts"
    Neil- " watch me know" I'm dead

    • @masterpopeyoda3290
      @masterpopeyoda3290 2 роки тому

      How was this never made into a meme. This is priceless.

    • @huskiehuskerson5300
      @huskiehuskerson5300 2 роки тому

      @@masterpopeyoda3290 ikr. Make one rn!

    • @markbrisec3972
      @markbrisec3972 2 роки тому

      And he showed him that his naive idea of why the Apollo program was cancelled was stupid.. I love NDGT and his realism. He's not some hippie scientist who thinks science should be good and a force for good. Atom bomb proves them wrong.

  • @cv_290
    @cv_290 3 роки тому +24

    Neil deGrasse Tyson, is the only person on the entire planet that makes me look up and wonder instead of looking down at my feet. He is a pioneer of both space and time, let's hope that the cosmos calls upon more of the consciousness than just him and you and I.

  • @gilanin
    @gilanin 9 років тому +71

    Neil Degrasse Tyson is the fucking embodiment of passion and I fucking love him.
    Of all of them, he is the one that makes me want to listen to him. The other ones came with the package.
    I bow to the others' knowledge, but Degrasse Tyson is a true educator at heart.

    • @SpaceCattttt
      @SpaceCattttt 9 років тому +3

      He's got passion, certainly. And quite often, that's exactly what's needed to get people's attention. But just like a black preacher, he often runs the risk of resembling a bull, loose in a china shop...

    • @DeathBringer769
      @DeathBringer769 9 років тому +1

      teppolundgren He's just having some fun up there.

    • @IkeandMike1
      @IkeandMike1 9 років тому +1

      +Mahfuz Hasan Prethul: He gave his opinion about what he enjoyed in the video. How is that right or wrong and not just different?

    • @SaifurMohsin
      @SaifurMohsin 9 років тому

      +1

    • @shamsmehdi3725
      @shamsmehdi3725 9 років тому +1

      Gil CJ neil tyson is a narcissistic piece of shit

  • @josephduenas4718
    @josephduenas4718 9 років тому +68

    I believe whole heartedly Seth McFarlane created Cleveland to look exactly like Neil

    • @Icureditwithmybrain
      @Icureditwithmybrain 8 років тому +1

      +joseph duenas WTF ITS TRUE LOL

    • @jaernem
      @jaernem 8 років тому +16

      And stewie to sound like Richard Dawkins.

  • @this_mfr
    @this_mfr 8 років тому +197

    Neil is such a top-caliber scientist not because of his science, but because he doesn't shy away from the truth of things. He tells it like it is and he doesn't deny reality. Not that the rest of them do, but he's willing to admit even when science isn't about science (NASA and the Cold War, for example).

    • @waltmagic
      @waltmagic 8 років тому +13

      +It's Me I was about to comment the same thing. He gets so excited and I love it...when you walk into the room with Neil Degrasse Tyson, you have entered the no bullshit zone!

    • @this_mfr
      @this_mfr 8 років тому +3

      Walter M You got it!

    • @ryanwporter
      @ryanwporter 8 років тому +14

      Neil Degrasse Tyson is without a doubt a unique individual. But one thing that I think he might share with his other astrophysicist colleagues, one of the advantages of being (a scientist) in that field, is being exposed to the perspective of big things. Big things like planets, solar systems, galaxies, and black holes, and all those other wonderfully enormous activities that are happening everyday, but out of the consciousness of the average individual. I think when you observe these objects for a living, you adopt a paradigm of understanding long stretches of time in a new way, you develop a new way to use scientific theory that dictates using BIG generalizations to arrive at conclusions(assisted with mathematics of course). Its all so BIG that its necessary to think BIG to even be able to comprehend what small bit you can, dare i say you need to, to even be able to do anything in the profession.
      Combine this perspective with ( another very contrasting perspective) of the small. For instance a relatively inconsequential individual political event(a squabble between two people), or a relatively small period of time(say 1,000 years) that seems to be a defining importance in history, or even individual person.
      Bring these two perspectives together, and you've hit philosophers sweet spot. The elusive pot of gold that every philosopher looks for to make the most intellectually stimulated reasoning ,the contradiction.
      The contradiction is nothing more than two logical extremes that in effect mark the two polar 'flagpoles' of capable thought. Once the playing field is defined, its a cake walk just to start applying human reason to arrive at a hypothesis. That is to say, JUST THINK with as much honesty as you can muster. Now with your newly developed hypothesis and power of reason in your back pocket, just start SCIENCING till you cant science anymore. When your happy enough or just tired of sciencing, and decided you've reached the happy medium you can be satisfied with !VOILA! You're somewhere earth-shattering. Just look around tell us what you see.
      Obviously, because of his career,we know he sees the big. Just by listening to his stories and intricate knowledge of human historical events, and even current events we know that he sees the small as well. I think this potent combination of contrasting perspectives is what gives Degrasse his confidence. Its part of why, it always seems like he's saying "No, please, I've got something important to say."
      He's just telling us what he sees.

    • @jakke1975
      @jakke1975 8 років тому +12

      He is top-caliber "get-the-camera's-on-me" material and he stole time from others to respond. I get that he's all excited and tries to spread the excitement to others, but I find it a little disrespectful when he starts answering questions that weren't directed at him.
      And if you ask me, he smokes too much weed. How many times did he wander off and lost the point he was getting to? He should calm down a little, take a pill ... let some others do some talking as well.

    • @GamerDudester
      @GamerDudester 7 років тому

      Yet he says government should be leading the frontier to Mars, instead of you know, people that are ACTUALLY DOING IT, like Space X.
      If we follow his prerogative then we would never go to Mars with government backing because there is absolutely 0 reasons from the geopolitical. Its literally another world.

  • @IMMORTALSYMPHONIES
    @IMMORTALSYMPHONIES 4 роки тому +7

    The ancient greeks and romans had social forums called gymnasiums where all the great thinkers and scholars got together and talked about science and philosophy. That became the cradle of modern scientific aptitude. This programs reminds me of that.

    • @AriaHarmony
      @AriaHarmony Рік тому

      That's what it reminded me of too. I wish society would embrace this more.

  • @George-pd4yb
    @George-pd4yb 8 років тому +23

    I love how Neil can say literally anything, and the crowd will applaud him xD

    • @MarioCavett
      @MarioCavett 3 роки тому +3

      Thats not true the things that neil said were relevant

  • @matteawilliams6710
    @matteawilliams6710 9 років тому +178

    What is people's problem with Richard Dawkins? A Tumblr post brought me to this video and everyone was giving him a bunch of crap. I don't see why. He didn't say anything bad. Can anyone tell me why so many people on that website don't like him? Because I think he's awesome. I get to do a biography on him for my science class and I'm super excited about it.

    • @bobsims2308
      @bobsims2308 9 років тому +38

      Same! That's why I'm here as well. I am a huge fan of both Dawkins and Nye!

    • @matteawilliams6710
      @matteawilliams6710 9 років тому +31

      Bobt Sims That's another thing that was weird. They loved Nye but hated Dawkins. They even acted like Dawkins disagreed with Nye for some reason, when they're really on the same page. It had something to do with the way he was sitting, I think. He was kind of leaning away from Nye and they said something along the lines of, "It's like Bill Nye has an aura that repels assholes." It's all nonsense.

    • @LunaticThinker
      @LunaticThinker 9 років тому +51

      Richard Dawkins is sort of... abrasive. He's honest and he speaks his mind. When he sees superstition he doesn't spare feelings while on his way to pointing it out. It has attracted to him the ire of lots of folks (religious folks mostly) in the past. And for some reason the radical "feminists" seem to hate him, never figured out why but it's most likely on some bullshit reason like most of the things they get their panties up in a bunch about nowadays.

    • @AragornStarscream81
      @AragornStarscream81 9 років тому +61

      Dawkins doesn't mince words, and tends to speak in a more calm and relatively neutral tone, as compared to NDT's or Nye's extreme enthusiasm. My guess is that those people on Tumblr didn't understand Dawkins or skipped past his chances to speak because they thought he was "boring;" in reality, while he's not the most enthusiastic or prominent member on that board, he has some of the best things to say.

    • @killerking471
      @killerking471 9 років тому +13

      Mattea Williams Yeah literally same, " tyranny is the deliberate removal of nuance ". The post on tumblr used a screenshot and the position Dawkins was sitting in to push an agenda. They presented the photo as if the two had disagreed. I think they just did it for popularity on that post, using bill nye the prominent,social figure as the american champion of " yeah woo equality!" and Dawkins was presented as the antagonist. It was just an opportunity to get some popularity on a post but im glad they did it because i thoroughly enjoyed watching this whole discussion.

  • @NorthernMonkeyYT
    @NorthernMonkeyYT 6 років тому +15

    Bill Nye made me roll on the floor with laugher when he was like "wow am I thinking or am I thinking am thinking" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @manjulanilsson6011
    @manjulanilsson6011 3 роки тому +37

    I've watched this debate several times over the past years. We need more like these.

  • @CHROMIUMHEROmusic
    @CHROMIUMHEROmusic 5 років тому +31

    9:00 I think Greene is right here. Tyson opts for the pop sci 'language of the universe' stuff to wow the audiences but in reality, as Greene says, maths is just used in our current logical *description* of the Universe. And an amazing one at that

    • @basstheory9384
      @basstheory9384 2 роки тому +2

      As much as I love Neil, that's my only critique of him.

    • @tfssoccer
      @tfssoccer 2 роки тому

      I agree with Neil! He’s right though, it is working now! If and when it limits us we’ll try other things but the current math has helped us explain many things that actually work and can be predicted!

  • @AkashKothawale
    @AkashKothawale 8 років тому +13

    That last part is what I call real women empowerment. No political agenda, no individual selfishness. Pure encouragement.

  • @CwonqeR
    @CwonqeR 7 років тому +52

    This is the best thing i've ever watched on youtube hands down.

  • @Remnants100
    @Remnants100 3 роки тому +14

    I was as much impressed by how Richard Dawkins managed to remember which nest belonged to which bird (without a script), as I was by the Cuckoo's sleight of hand. His story became so convoluted at one point that I very nearly lost the thread. 😂

  • @agnosticii
    @agnosticii 9 років тому +12

    Man, that was one of the best things ever. I'm grateful for every one of these individuals. Special thanks to Lawrence Krauss for organizing stuff like this, very much necessary.

  • @JAM609
    @JAM609 8 років тому +38

    Honestly loved every moment of this video. This is the stuff I live for. Beautiful.

  • @sicfxmusic
    @sicfxmusic 4 роки тому +22

    20:44 When the teacher's asking a question and she can pick a random student to answer

  • @jeffhall2411
    @jeffhall2411 Рік тому +2

    I think a lot of times when people say " i am not good at something" , sometimes it can be about the teacher too, i know i failed algebra in my high school and always thought i was bad at math, But i took physics in high school, and my physics teacher was passionate and loved to teach just like Neil and he made you interested and took the time to explain very well, i got amazing grades in that class and it was the most fun and interesting one i ever took in school. He always took 2 weeks to teach astronomy as well as he was a college teacher of astronomy at a local community college. He may have passed from this earth, but his legacy of teaching young adults good science will always be remembered! Thanks MR. FRED.

  • @CapinCooke
    @CapinCooke 4 роки тому +33

    I can’t believe I missed video this for 7 years! Great debaters. Great topics. With enough humor thrown in to make me smile a lot and even laugh explosively a few times.
    Very inspirational at times. The opening remarks about “look around the venue. Science gave us everything here. The lights, the paint, your clothes...”
    Just a great panel. I wish it was 5 hours longer.

  • @falco830
    @falco830 10 років тому +18

    Tyson speaks the truth about space... DAMN! But I can agree that science can be driven by exploration and discovery, but military purposes are very dominant as far a as pushing these fields forward.

  • @Søutħsidë
    @Søutħsidë 4 роки тому +30

    These are the avengers of the science field!

  • @ayoPHREEK
    @ayoPHREEK 3 роки тому +66

    Man Neil degrasse tyson is so passionate about science you can't help but listen
    I wouldve gotten straight A's if he was my teacher every year growing up

  • @ASLUHLUHCE
    @ASLUHLUHCE 4 роки тому +106

    This was a mess... but extremely entertaining

  • @YOUNGTALENT3D
    @YOUNGTALENT3D 8 років тому +16

    I could listen to talks like this for days. In fact, it's 10 am and I haven't been to bed yet. I've been binge watching Cosmos and this talk since last night :P

  • @PhysicsNerd01
    @PhysicsNerd01 3 роки тому +6

    Sometimes I still stay awake at night asking myself "Am I thinking? Or am I just thinking that I am thinking?"

  • @Adityamaurya1
    @Adityamaurya1 3 роки тому +23

    i love this debate, i wish it could've gone longer

  • @Cioper
    @Cioper 4 роки тому +41

    30:02 - 30:17 "and I slap them!" xD

  • @Just_som_Ottur
    @Just_som_Ottur 4 роки тому +86

    “There’s an attitude in the culture that says that everybody’s entitled to their opinion, you have to respect their opinion... No you damn well haven’t got to respect their opinion!”
    I don’t know who that guy is, but I like him.

    • @AshifAbdulhai
      @AshifAbdulhai 4 роки тому +4

      Richard Dawkin

    • @wassum100
      @wassum100 4 роки тому +3

      ‘Dawkins’

    • @Blood0cean
      @Blood0cean 3 роки тому

      That however sounds like the mentality of theologists.... so....

    • @MartialArtzz
      @MartialArtzz 3 роки тому +2

      @@Blood0cean I disagree. He is saying you do not need to respect uninformed, biased opinions. You should give as much respect to an opinion as the person has put towards it. Most religious people do very little of this, though not all. Richard Dawkins lives by this philosophy and has talked to religious leaders many times, which is no doubt where he learned this lesson. Many of them do not understand the basics of science, its teachings, or even the teachings of their faith, and as such their opinions are practically worthless. They are entitled to have them, but that doesn't mean it's quality, or that you should respect such an opinion.

    • @AlcibiadesMD
      @AlcibiadesMD 2 роки тому

      The one and only Professor Richard Dawkins.

  • @johnyepthomi892
    @johnyepthomi892 4 роки тому +13

    Brian Greene with the math joke was epic. It's really hilarious the way he put it. Love all of them.

  • @sevnsyn
    @sevnsyn 2 роки тому +11

    This was a GREAT find. I found a new respect for Neil and Bill. I was terribly disappointing that Brian was not more involved.

  • @MrDontmakemecomeover
    @MrDontmakemecomeover 10 років тому +94

    Neil is a Hollywood Scientist, Showmanship. He is the reason why more people are watching science shows.

    • @oquefilmaragora
      @oquefilmaragora 10 років тому +5

      something utterly necessary for the end of ignorance, is faces to watch with good things to say! yay neil

    • @hohenheim909
      @hohenheim909 9 років тому +12

      Neil can do astrophysics calculations, can you?

    • @96nikecha
      @96nikecha 9 років тому +6

      Now as Skarloe said, if your seconds sentence is the essential part of your sentence, then yes, that is exactly correct. But IF you are suggesting that he's is whatever way less intelligent for reaching out to people, you should know he graduated Harvard with a full scholarship for all 4 years. That alone is enough. I don't think I need to go over everything else.

  • @vincentv6891
    @vincentv6891 10 років тому +18

    This was amazing, I was smiling and giggling the whole time. As these people were inspired to pursue science by the scientist that came before them. To me these people are my inspiration, the reason why my major is physics.

  • @rouen1111
    @rouen1111 6 років тому +7

    36:28 i think richard dawkins is sending morse code by blinking at the camera

  • @alexanderpeca7080
    @alexanderpeca7080 3 роки тому +5

    Tyson doing a Chomskian analysis here, dismantling myths and in a funny way. Love the entire panel and discussion.
    You really have to love the American levity, and Richard is enjoying it too.

  • @dalekslayer777
    @dalekslayer777 4 роки тому +30

    40:18 he might have said this a little early but it hits really hard right now
    -for those in the future it’s five months into the 2020 quarantine

  • @Mebzy
    @Mebzy 4 роки тому +8

    'People think that you have to be a mathematical wizard to be a physicist... much less an engineer' that was savage as fuck!! I was laughing so hard, that was such an underrated burn!

  • @Sebastian_S_Azar
    @Sebastian_S_Azar 9 років тому +25

    33:20 -- Priceless!
    I have to say though, Neil is a bit too enthusiastic throughout this event...

  • @azynkron
    @azynkron 2 роки тому +6

    13:35 One of the most brilliant moments in the history of science debate

  • @TheRiboka
    @TheRiboka 8 років тому +17

    9:20 RIchard's face after the comment about republicans is just priceless

  • @ciyean
    @ciyean 9 років тому +47

    At what point in life could you ever imagine you'd see Neil deGrasse Tyson stand up angrily (all in good fun of course) to "attack" Brian Greene and then Bill Nye has to hold him back so Greene could get free shots in on Neil. With a *quiet* Richard Dawkins looking on to all of this (notice my emphasize on quiet).
    Loved this panel, I've seen thousands of cumulative hours on these guys giving speeches, debates, and talks and I've read quite of few of their books... and although this was no where near as informational as these great minds could provide I loved that you really got to see the personalities, the humanness if you will, of these individuals in this video.
    And Tracy Day is hot! Nothing like a beautiful intelligent woman. I'm all for more women involved in the sciences!

  • @SP00KY
    @SP00KY 8 років тому +17

    Bill Nye: "To that I got to say like, oh wow."
    "Am I like thinking or am I just I'm thinking... wow."
    Takes a 'hit.' XD
    Favorite moment 13:35

  • @ginamcdonald7854
    @ginamcdonald7854 3 роки тому +12

    I didn’t want this to end!!! Just keep talking and sharing your knowledge!!!