Making STRONG shelves with Topology Optimization
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 вер 2024
- A project, that's fun, educational, cool-looking, and actually useful! What more could you want?
We're making topology-optimized floating shelf brackets today 👍
Grab the design www.prusaprint...
Why the topology optimized brackets weren't screwed to studs (and other questions answered)!
• Why the topology optim...
Materials used/shown:
MK3 go.toms3d.org/M...
Proto-pasta TOM filament go.toms3d.org/P...
DAS Filament Multicolor Galaxy www.dasfilamen...
Elegoo Mars go.toms3d.org/E...
Read the article to this video here: toms3d.org/201...
💙 Enjoying the videos? Support my work on Patreon! / toms3dp
Product links are affiliate links - I may earn a commission on qualifying purchases (at no extra cost to you)
🎥 All my video gear toms3d.org/my-...
I use Epidemic Sound, sign up for a 30-day free trial here share.epidemics...
🎧 Check out the Meltzone Podcast (with CNC Kitchen)! / @themeltzone
👐 Enjoying the videos? Support my work on Patreon! / toms3dp
How about a topology-optimized BIKE ? I wanna see that alien bike.
It would break
@@1248erik no
Yes!
That was my first thought as well, I had been dreaming of it since the '90s when doing solid modeling and mountain biking.
@@Markfps yes. topology optimisation doesn't just remove unnecessary material, it also removes strength from it. its called optimisation because you're saving more on not spending that extra material because you don't need all the strength. in bikes, you need the strength. even then, bikes can break (if you dont go into dumb detail about what its made of). so no - you're wrong.
Would be nice if the algorithm were aware of fdm printing and that you could configure layer orientation, then it could account for layer to layer weakness...
Stefan and Thomas talked in one of their meltzone podcast episodes i think :)
People have been asking for anisotropic materials for a good while. I don't know if the'll ever do it. The usual response is use autodesk inventor if you need that.
@@dibblethwaite I've looked into anisotropic materials for fiberglass composites but haven't found much for FEA software. It's (much) more complex and I think you need to know more about structural engineering.
Generative us doing that.byou can define a bunch of materials and different manufacturing processes (including fdm printing) and the generated design takes this into account.
Same for the infill!
But that sounds like a really hard problem.
I would assume it would be easier with generative design, because it should be easier to predict properties of synthesized parts than parts where a wall moves when you remove something.
Hmmm well if it is a linear property maybe you could just scale one dimension before the optimization and scale it back afterwards.
For future etymologists:
This may be the first use of the term "analog documents".
2019, folks.
I was recently discussing how the term, "paperwork" now often refers to online forms (specifically forms required for tax, insurance, rental applications, and other formal purposes) but often requires no actual paper.
Wing mirror. Dash board. Trunk. English (and no doubt, all other languages) is full of words divorced from their original meaning. This is how it happens.
@@questionablecommands9423 funny, because we have been talking soft copies and actual paper-work as long as i can remember. Even though things are digital here in India there's just too much paper . Well we will someday look back at it too.
Analog is still electronic, though.
For example, old TVs, radios and video tape players & recorders are electronic devices but they are analog, not digital.
A better term would be "physical documents".
@@hrgwea i still have lots of electronic analog stuff in my house
they all break at the unsimulated part , where it attaches to the wall
yea the connection seems to be the weak point on this. Seems like it might fail from tear out due to shearing if overloaded, or possibly bearing if plastic is somewhat malleable.
Thing is, did he use a stud finder to more securely place the shelves?
Scout2 it does not look like it lol, he just put it into the drywall.. he's clearly not informed on house work much, hes put his brain towards 3-D printing
I wonder if the software take into account fixed points, or only cares about load and shape.
@@greenthizzle4 I think most houses in Germany are built different from America. they don't use wood... it seems to be mostly masonry. If you notice Germans always mock American house construction methods
me: "youtube, why you recommending this? this is not my contents"
youtube: "umm, it's 3 am?"
me: "alright i take it"
totally.
its 3am again, youtubes doing its thing- clicked on this ~3:10am
It's literally just about to hit 3 am here in the land of Kiwi. Your comment hits too close to home.
Those are some beautiful shelf baskets! Awesome work, Tom.
They are beautiful but they gonna collect a LOT of dust
@Zygy __ compressed air will just throw dust elsewere
They're pretty hideous but the science is beautiful
@@revertfpv2928 All you need is a tissue and some water. Done. Something like Denture tablets in water are not corrosive at all and clean stuff very well. Always use them for my keyboards over Iso or anything else.
But youre using topology optimalisation and then a hollow print.....
But did you see him stand on the shelve...
@@TonyRios But you could have done that with a straight beam bracket, that weighed 1/6 as much.
This is poorly designed.
@@operator8014 But it looks 1/6 as cool
@@EngineeringTechnikcom Not wrong. Actually completely correct. You may now leave this conversation that you are not qualified to speak on. Thank you.
@@operator8014
Says the person thinking their opinion is a factual statement.
Fusion no longer supports this in the free version, boo
I died a little bit when I saw those hardwood boards go from being beautiful to painted white 😨
Yeah. That was barbaric.
Same! Saw the beautiful wood and thought 'he spent extra for this project' then came the paint. :(
Sadness level maxed
I liked the look of it.
I would have used a filament that was wood pulp-based painted the edges on the boards and supports, and tied it all together that way.
This is what it would look like if the Covenant had shelves.
You just nailed what my subconscious mind was thinking the whole time, it's definitely the purple haha
halooooooooooooooooooo
except the covenant would never ruin their shelves with white paint.
In Rhinos Grasshopper there is an extension called tOpos which runs topology optimizations localy.
Buchsbaumschere what is rhinos grasshopper
@@justasingledronevideo2583 Rhino is a CAD package, and Grasshopper is an algorithmic modeling plugin for Rhino. A commercial license for Rhino 6 costs $995.
Ryan Willis that doesn’t sound like an optimal alternative to F360 if it’s free
I also use Rhino, it's a much better option and comes with much more functionality then the limited subscriptions of fusion 360
@@sparkyferret550 I try to avoid Autodesk whenever possible lol
Interesting how the supports resemble tree branches
interesting but not surprising: biology has been doing topology optimisation for millions of years. Trees are very, very efficient structures.
For me those resemble bones. Bones grow where they are under stress. I don't know if that applies for trees but I suspect yes. It's all literally runtime topological optimization :P
@@mastermati773 bingo -> smaht
This would be a really interesting design to do an investment casting of and get aluminum brackets.
I would like a strength comparison between the smaller topology optimised brackets and a similar (roughly equivalent) squarish design printed in a more optimal orientation (on its side)
I assume that Thomas was going for a more organic design. One for which generative design is better suited, but requires cloud credit expense.
I'm guessing squarish design won. the purpose of topology *optimised* is to use the least materials to achieve the necessary strength, as oppose to make it stronger than conventional shape
wasted $100 on simulation
has sharp edge on highest stress area
10/10 engineering
Wasted 15 minutes watching a video.
Makes a comment about spending $100 when he says multiple times he's using the free option.
10/10 youtube viewer.
0/10 listening comprehension
@@fayenotfaye wasted 15 seconds reading reply to comment
Wastes 15 seconds writing reply about wasting 15 seconds replying to a comment
me: wastes 5 minutes figuring out reply to reply about wasting 15 minutes watching a video
me: next level youtube replier
@@KyleDB150 at this point my math skills aren´t sufficient enough to leave a good reply
You're all 10/10 people in my book. You beautiful strangers.
That's true what you said in the last part, the process does not care how much load you have if you are only specifying (1) Strain Energy and (2) Volume Constraint.
You need to put additional constraints such as deflection so that the software optimizes your structure given a certain load. I use ABAQUS for Optimization by the way.
By the way, your video is awesome! so much appreciated!!!
I neither have ideas about mechanical engineering nor about Autodesk, but I have found this video very understandable, interesting and reasonable. Keep up the good work!
Saw this video in 2019 and just came here to thank you. It showed me a whole new (and very interesting) world that I didn't knew about at the time.
Now I'm really happy, as I get to make a living solving problems with finite element analysis every day.
Thank you so much, this video changed my life for the better.
Very good video Thomas! One note (as Stefan from CNC Kitchen also points out) -- a big issue with this approach is that FDM 3D printed parts are anisotropic, so results should be taken with a grain of salt (or large factor of safety). I would be very interested in seeing comparison results in this regard between FDM and resin prints and their predicted vs. measured failure loads.
Also the way he set up his simulation; he only constrained where the countersunk screws were and didn't add a planar constraint where the bracket touches the wall. That's probably why the program almost immediately lightweighted that section and didn't connect any ribs to it.
And then he printed it with infill, which is definitely different than what the program was calculating for.
It's a cool way to get very organic looking parts or to visualize your load paths, but I wouldn't trust it without a big safety factor.
@@timbarrett4580 it's a gimmick. I can't imagine this optimization being useful for any manufacturing process
@@Jaze2022wrong
Pretty neat!
I don't think I'd have painted the models. At least not any of the curved sections. The colour gradient seems to work well with the organic shape.
Good to know that 3D prints are stronger than modern houses
I have to say that this has to be one of the prettiest functional print I've seen (prolly one of the prettiest prints I've seen in total). Thank you for the STL file. Cant wait to get into Fusion 360 and topology studies.
Great video and I like that you've shown your iterative process. That you have not used the MMU but simply painted the parts is great, too. And the result is awesome.
Watching this video in great anticipation on how to optimise the simple shelf bracket, just to discover 3 minutes in that you just wanted to make the look cool and throw all the engineering and material science out the door!!
How is maintenance on them? I'm imagining they trap dust in their phalanges.
You could add a solid layer (maybe glass) to the sides.
try to imagine trying to clean a xenomorph hive or polish the furniture in Giger Bar
I hate it when I get dust in my phalanges.
youtube: making something spectacularly complicated
me: using a triangle and doing just fine
in the next episode Thomas will print walls for his home
Don't tempt me
Entire walls - too big. But small, topology-optimized interlocking bricks would be viable.
People are building houses out of plastic bottles and cans - why not out of 3-D printed bricks?
Thomas Sanladerer you need to print some studs for inside the drywall so your not screwing into plain drywall
Jake Mitch drywall anchors are perfectly suitable for light to medium duty shelving. Most of the crappy ones are rated for 50lbs per anchor.
@@greenthizzle4 It isn't drywall. It is actual material worth building a house from, a type of aerated concrete block which is the internal insulation, with a brick or solid concrete outer skin. Waterproof and light, and cheap, and no timber to rot or get eaten. The only downside is you need the correct fixings if putting up shelves!
I wanted to construct a Wall shelf for my PC (~40-50lbs) it's quite heavy... and by you just standing on these shelves, I think I found my solution
Question: Does the simulation understand the model is full of hollow cavities? Or did you print them at 100% infill? How does this work with the material properties related to FDM?
It does not. You can shell your part before doing an optimization. Maybe a subject for a follow up video?
Simulating FDM 3D printed parts is nearly impossible - between the intricate detail that is infill and the anisotropy that layer adhesion causes, it would be a massive simulation project unless you over-simplify the model to the point where it's only a very rough approximation.
@@MadeWithLayers hmmm, I wonder if simulating a vertical slice of layers would be enough, the layers simulated in 2d across the center for adhesion and compression applied to the rest as a value of its tensile and compression strength might be enough to be 'close enough'. Making parts function under compression through layers and extension only through horizontally printed loops is tricky... its tricky, its tricky tricky tricky. Uh.
They looked like women's high heel shoes before you put them up. Now they look like you should have a bunch of "Yes" albums on the shelves - lol!
Very cool brackets! Thanks for the video.
I'm pretty sure that PLA under load creeps over time, which would not be good. It looks //great// though.
I interpret this as a metaphor for the broader reality of existence and all living things. Just like in society, some individuals make more significant contributions than others, which is also true in our personal lives
You should use a studfinder to locate the screws in material (wood) that will support some weight. Drywall won't hold much.
When I was doing finite element stress analysis with NASTRAN (a while ago), I had to accurately model the loads and constraints and the strength of materials. There was some voodoo involved. It was easier in that they were steel structures; I wasn't working with the complicated material of a 3D print.
European buildings are almost never timberframed. They are nearly always built around brick or concrete walls. That's why he got out such a heavy drill, you pretty much need a percussion drill to hang anything in Europe in most cases. A studfinder won't do you any good here.
This is neither a stud wall not covered with drywall.
Its been a long time Thomas! I just started my delta printer design up again after over a year of it sitting. Zero cleaning, ran perfect, polymer bushing rails FTW!!! Literally 1mm of dust on some parts (edit: ok thats a total lie, its like .3mm at most sorry), delrin sliders shove it aside cleanly and slide smoothly, ignoring any cooking oils etc from the kitchen 10 feet away that must be on them. 5 dollar diy printable linear motion WORKS.
Wow, Autodesk is such a phenomenal racket. Remember when people were just upset over how expensive perpetual licenses of CAD software were?
I'd recommend putting a small lip around the bottom of the top support portion (the "U"-shaped bit at the top) just to give the white edge you made a cleaner look. You can be extra-fancy and maybe add a very low amplitude wave effect to reflect the organic look.
I think topology optimization is mostly good for solid components (as in, not FDM printed). When it comes to strength and lower material use, at least.
I've noticed, that you can sometimes actually save material cost / weight by removing holes, as they will basically replace some (low) infill with perimeters. On the other hand, they can increase part strength. And look cool. The most important thing.
Sounds like gypsum walls you have and you need butterfly dowels for that. They open up a cross behind the wall as you screw them.
Great work, I learnt a lot :)
Needs a stud finder so he can actually attach the brackets to something soid.
I am so excited for this tech to see wider adoption. The algorithms used studied things like bone structure during their creation.
There's not many options as of yet, but I expect that to change. This kind of optimization almost spells the end for what we think are straight lines. Our world is going to get far more curvy!
Pretty amazing that using a huge amount of math and simulation we get a structure that is like tree branches and bone structure. Nature and evolution themselves are an algorithm for optimization. Awesome video!
That Multicolor Galaxy PLA is really nice.
Looks similar to the "waste" filament i got, that has a slow merging discoloration, which happens during colour changes in filament production. Great to see an other version with more significant, "forced" colour changes
Now I wish I wasn't colourblind
It would be interesting to see the optimization result if a stress limitation was used which proportioned a lower stress in the cross grain direction. It would be good to know if the optimizations was for strain energy or a limited stress/strain.
interested in industrial design. mounts brackets onto drywall with molly bolts and glue.
LOL yeah.
Here where I live all the walls are always thick and strong, so when I tried mounting some things with walls like those, it was very confusing for me at the beginning :D
It's not drywall lol. Here in Germany walls are typically made out of concrete or concrete bricks with plaster/render added on top, also inside of houses. So mounting a shelf with dowels and screws is the way to go. You can see him using a hammer drill in the video too.
@@kurtwagner6574 thx 4 elucidating
@@kurtwagner6574
Actually it is foam concret bricks (ytong), so definitely not dry wall, but also not solid concrete.
I was looking at the braces thinking, yeah they look cool, but they don't look that sturdy. Then you stepped on it and it didn't flinch. Damn that's cool.
Too bad that TO is not available in free version of F360 nowadays.
This is incredible. I'm a musician and know nothing about this design world, but I love what you've done. Never seen anything like this before. Thank you for making this!
i would assume the point of setting a weight in the topology optimizer is for if you have multiple loads and want to configure their relative forces
"...my 16 cores are bored to death while...." Lol, spot on!
The more complex our algorithms and processes get the more and more they mimic nature.
I would rather say that nature and simulation converge on the same optimum.
@@tombratfred3102 I would argue that evolution is a good optimisation algorithm which ran for a long time and found almost optimal solution for some problems, and machines are finding good solution to these problems now
@@forloop7713 This is exactly what I implied ;)
Neat experiment, lots of lessons learned. Knowing how to mount in different wall mediums is KEY. Also looks like you used the failed mount in the end, I'd recommend swapping it out!
Simulation is not available on the free version
I get chills thinking about a future society where a majority of our design and technology is so advanced that it just looks organic.
Dang!... I JUST found a use for topology optimization and now they've removed it from the free version
This is actually very easy. I design and program for a living. The software these days are phenomenal.
I'd like to see it redone with the top wider than the bottom where it connects to the wall.
Since that was the failure point, and it doesn't have to be straight and square to save material or make it easier to produce.
Love this function.
I am finally getting into actually working with 3D, making my own functional parts, so this is absolutely fascinating :D
P.S.: Anybody wondering about the music in this video:
Farrel Wooten - Lead
Power Druid - Forever Falling
Absolutely lovely
That bottom part of that piece hes holding at 11:22 aint looking so hot . But then it gets glossed over like nothing happened so im like :V
and I thought it was funny that he was like "what is this...foam concrete" and if he means drywall then it's amazing that someone with such specialized knowledge doesn't know about drywall. It's great to see examples of how experts are just normal people in areas other than their field. Like how Ben Carson is a brain surgeon but that doesn't mean his politics are good.
@@david102994 hey you numbnuts, do you understand this person is german? he probably speaks english better than you.
Most likely he printed another after the anchor failed to hold.
Not blaming the design of the 3D printed part for the failure of the anchor.
david102994 in europe houses are made of bricks and concrete, but sometimes if youre unlucky you can hit a hollow or foamy part that just doesnt hold. We dont have drywalls. He just hit a bad spot. Happens to the best of us
@@r3dluff idk where you're from, but drywall is pretty common in sweden.
Not sure if you will read this comment at this point but I will leave it here anyways.
1. This video gave me inspiration in my Mech Engineering final degree project in Q2 2020. I am now an Engineer. Came by your video again after buying a 3D Printer xD.
2. For the wall plugs, for plaster walls as they are called, I really recommend you Fischer Duoblade. Each one of those holds 8Kg, and you don't even need a drill!
Great to hear! It's still not a plaster wall or drywall, though 😉
Did you figure out what settings make more fingers show up? I was inspired to give this a shot, and made a 80% similar shape to test shape optimization. Sometimes I get a finger or 2, but...mostly it solves without much interesting geometries. Are there any secrets or tips to force more interesting solve geometry? Currently experimenting, but it takes a while for each solve : /
had you found out how?
Topology-optimized buildings would be the first step in futuristic nature cities.
"teach you about topology optimization, while you're at it". Not really, it only teaches you how to use Fusion 360 to use their topology optimization tool. (Which is also good, of course)
it teaches you the essentials, go do an engineering degree if you want to learn it properly
It's amazing that the same principle that allows the shelves to be constructed this way (on the exterior) is the same thing that the printer uses to lay the internal wiring to optimize resources
If you could place the top screw lower, you could make a flat surface and print them upside down. Maybe a bit harder to install them.
Great job giving a rundown of the process. A way to make it better is to add in the hardwood plank by incorporating it into the model by adding 2 additional hard points where you fasten the board to the support arms. That would drastically reduce materials required.
Could you compare the strength of these to one that you optimize yourself by intuition with the same amount of material?
These are beautiful, the white accents look sharp
I'd like to see a stress test comparing a topology-optimized shelf bracket with more conventional 3D-printed brackets, to see exactly how much more weight it would allow it to hold before failing/sagging.
I don't think this allows *more* weight then the full brick if that's what you're asking. It's obviously weaker, but it takes out a huge percentage of the material for an insignifant strength loss.
almarc the whole point of topology optimization is to reduce used material while maintaing the same properties as the original structure.
@@ggeorgo555 I'm not a certified professional of course, but it can't remain "the same". It can only be 99% or something as strong. Unless you remove some bump on the side that literally carried no weight on it whatsoever.
@@almarc
I didn't mean testing whether it was stronger than the full brick.
By "conventional" brackets, I meant like, 3D-print the kinds of brackets one might find in a store. One that's literally just an L-shape, one that's a triangle shape (L with a single crossbeam), etc. The topology optimized bracket, judging by its appearance, would actually have slightly more material than these.
Sure, topology optimization is built for retaining mostly the same strength while massively reducing material used, but another way to look at it is that it can massively increase strength with only a small increase in material used, depending on what is used as the input shape. A bracket with 90% of the strength of a solid square block is likely going to be stronger than a bracket with 100% of the strength of a hollow triangle.
I could see this working the other way around. Using topology optimization to create redundant points of failure to maintaining a factor of safety if one failure point fractures.
I used this same process to make a stronger version of my RC car chassis, worked amazing! Love Fusion 360
That sounds cooool
It looks very organic, reminds me of microstructures in bone marrow. Kind of cool to see evolution and computer algorithms arrive to a similar spindly design
2:30 Wait, they charge you for running simulations on a software you've already paid for, using store credits??
Have micro transactions found their way into even 3d engineering software?
What is wrong with this world
you're paying to rent compute resources to run the simulation. you could do the same thing at home if you had a supercomputer
@@TouchedAlot You don't need a supercomputer to run such simulation. Engineers at my work run simulations on 16 core PCs at work with no problem on other software. They are just milking people for money.
jus because your computer is a potatoe PC doesnt mean modern computers are sUpEr cOmPuTeRs
most people don't have lots of computers ready and available to throw at simulations. there is no reason to buy, configure and maintain lots of computers yourself if all you want to do is run simulations because you can just rent the amount of computing power you need on demand
As others have said, it's not a microtransaction. You're paying for their server time to run it on their computers. One reason given for them not allowing us to run these simulations on our own computers is that it would require them giving out the code for how to do it.
I rarely give a like out, but because you shared the file and did all that testing, it was the least I could do. Great Job!
I've done simulations like this in Fusion before, but I'm always confused what material to select. I wonder which material would most closely simulate PLA, and if there's maybe something that can be done relating to force vectors to compensate for the weakness between layers.
...try wood, maybe - as it has a similar directional strength profile? Cross-grain should approximate layers shearing pretty well, for the purpose of calculations?
This video looks crisp. Congratulations on lighting
Tom: Says the guy who lives in an IKEA catalog
IKEA: 👍
Reminds me about fight club.
It’s like drooping toxic goo. I LOVE it!!
First off all: great video! Awesome shelves! Then to my question: why gyroid infill? While cool to watch and fast to print, it's not strong at all. No two lines really rest on top of each other, so no load bearing compared to triangular or grid. I know your shelves were more than strong enough, but how about some experiments with this? Or should I poke Steffan with it? 😜
Definitely a topic worth investigating! Gyroid is supposed to be the ultimate (isotopic) infill pattern, so I use it whenever print time isn't super crucial.
Nobody's talking about how nice looking those high heels look? I mean, they're literally galactic *and* organic!
Have you considered creep (material aging under load)? PLA is notorious for it.
Also I still don't understand why people just don't design the part hollow where you don't need the material instead of using infill.
You're infill also makes the simulation nonsense (besides anisotropy).
"Also I still don't understand why people just don't design the part hollow where you don't need the material instead of using infill." I think a part of it may be that it reduces the distance that the printer needs to bridge or create over hangs for when creating the top layers. As printers can be quiet restricted in how far they can bridge and overhang the fill makes it a lot easier to design printable structures.
Designing hollow parts for 3d printing requires special design considerations (I.e. limitations) and printing hollow will *never* produce a stronger part than printing with until. Computer simulations don’t have to be absolutely accurate, relative accuracy is good enough in the world of 3d printed parts.
I can guarantee that the shelf braises i made are stronger, and they do look really good but in a very different way. mine are made out of 2mm thich strainless steel. i used a hyudraulic press with a folding tool to make the 90 degree angles and made the reinforcement triangles out of the same 2mm stainless steel. i then TIG welded them together and tadah! it is a super strong and really clean looking shelf bracket and i can for shure say that mine were far easier to make and took way less time (less than 1 hour for both of them combined)
this was a very interesting video tho, i might have to play around with that feature =)
Without a doubt the best looking shelf brackets i've ever seen, great tutorial Tom
HAHAHAHA I was honestly thinking "so much design work and testing and thinking for it to screw into drywall 🤦🏻♂️" a second before the screw came out the wall.
But the real question is, how did it print so well without supports!
The simulation is made for a solid part. It looks like you printed it at 25% infill. Try 100% infill and you should get better results.
Better than holding 65kg+? What's the point of making it more expensive and slower to print?
@@NigelTolley My point is that after testing the bracket in the video, he could even further reduce the material using the topology optimization using an infill at 100%. By doing this, the overall design will be reduced with less material. But like you said, even a 25% grid (or whatever infill type and percentage he was using) is surprisingly strong.
Amazing video you are great as allways its autodesk that is the problem now
Perhaps an upgraded version that uses freecad could be nice 😀
So much for it being free, for a while now its felt like fusion has been on a downwards spiral and the older versions were better :( oh how i wish i could downgrade to 2019 fusion or 2020 fusion
You could do the following to literally mass produce them and do it so much faster: You could buy some molding silicone and epoxy, 3d print an empty inside positive shape, prepare a mold from the silicone and create as many copies as you wish with the epoxy and add some coloring for insanely good looks!
you need to mount those to studs in the wall, anchoring to the drywall is usually a bad idea
It is not drywall. He literally says they are construction blocks. Not many countries build houses like the US does. They're still the wrong fixings though ;)
@@MarkHanford He literally has no idea what kind of wall it was... It was most likely a plaster wall. The can withstand quite some force when plugged correctly but it is always best to find a stud.
Drywall anchors are rated for like 50lbs + per anchor, and that’s for the crappiest ones.
@@joshuawiens1344 good luck putting a drywall anchor into masonry block. That's even more worryingly wrong than the slightly wrong fixings Thomas used.
lol concrete not drywall...
That's really cool. The white accents on the holders and the natural top of the boards.
Great video and just as professionally made as always.
You could probably add some steps and use investment casting to make metal versions of these brackets.
Totally overkill for a shelf bracket, since the wooden shelf will probably collapse before the brackets do. But it'll be pretty.
Simulation is not available in the free trial😭
I absolutely love the minimalistic look of your shelves
Those look sick. Great job
Thanks!
Confusion 360 is really cool. I had never heard of this, but will surely try it out!
No...the brackets did not hold up, as clearly seen at 11:18 with it being cracked.
Just to see if I got this right, you'd use TO make a coffee mug by taking everything you don't need from a solid block, but generative design would entail sticking the handle on as separate operation.
You need to drill into the studs. That drywall is likely gypsum, not very strong.
If you HAVE to anchor in the sheet, use an expanding anchor that expands on the other side of the sheet. You can find these in hardware stores; look like mushrooms once they expand.
Well, the wall isn't drywall, so....
@@MadeWithLayers Is the wall solid or hollow? Or a mix, like you get with channels in cinderblock? The red anchor shown in the video looks like a masonry expanding anchor (like you'd use in solid brick or concrete,) which is not right for anything with a cavity behind the surface -- you'll want a hollow wall anchor for that.
It's "foam concrete", commonly known as "aircrete", which is solid, but porous material. My anchors are rated for that use.
@@MadeWithLayers If the shelves are still sitting there I guess it works well :-)
I have no idea why the algorithm decided I wanted to see your videos but I'm glad it did.
Can the simulations take account of infill patterns/density?
No.
Toggles.
My absolutely favorite type of fastener. I use wall toggles on many commercial applications. Furniture to custom stuff. They are the best, but leave a 1/2" hole too. So, sometimes you can't do that.