good comparison video. theres multiple other vids of strength tests and the rhino rescue holds on par with the NAR CAT TQ. in my experience rhino rescue is similar if not the same quality as NAR for a more affordable cost
CEP for 30+ yrs, and I have a bunch of these RR TQs. The metal windlass version is available at a slight (but worth it) premium, and in my opinion is even stronger than the nylon one. TQs are like Narcan to me, I always have several of each on hand, because I'm likely to give them to other rescuers I work with if they dont carry their own.
Same concept as buying hemostatic gauze or combat gauze vs regular gauze. They function the Same way and there is little advantage to buying the brand name.
I would agree that plain cotton gauze is plain cotton gauze. It does not matter what you get. As for hemostatic gauze that has an active ingredient, brand MAY matter. But I don't know of any way you could test it.
good comparison video. theres multiple other vids of strength tests and the rhino rescue holds on par with the NAR CAT TQ. in my experience rhino rescue is similar if not the same quality as NAR for a more affordable cost
CEP for 30+ yrs, and I have a bunch of these RR TQs. The metal windlass version is available at a slight (but worth it) premium, and in my opinion is even stronger than the nylon one. TQs are like Narcan to me, I always have several of each on hand, because I'm likely to give them to other rescuers I work with if they dont carry their own.
Same concept as buying hemostatic gauze or combat gauze vs regular gauze. They function the Same way and there is little advantage to buying the brand name.
I would agree that plain cotton gauze is plain cotton gauze. It does not matter what you get. As for hemostatic gauze that has an active ingredient, brand MAY matter. But I don't know of any way you could test it.