US Military New Massive Demand For SpaceX's Starship After Flight 4!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 чер 2024
  • US Military New Massive Demand For SpaceX's Starship After Flight 4!
    ===
    0:00 - 0:19 : Intro
    0:19 - 3:04 : Starship and Starshield
    3:05 - 5:17: Starship’s point-to-point transportation and gas station capability
    5:18 - 8:19: Starship contracts with the United States military
    8:20 - 8:57 : Outro
    ===
    #techmap #techmaps #elonmusk #starshipspacex #starship
    ===
    SpaceX / @spacex
    TijnM / @tijn_m
    spaceX: x.com/spacex
    Cosmic Perspective / @cosmicperspective
    LabPadre / @labpadre
    ===
    US Military New Massive Demand For SpaceX's Starship After Flight 4!
    SpaceX has recently thrilled space fans with the spectacular performance of Starship on its fourth test flight. But surely we space fans aren't the only ones excited. The U.S. military has been eyeing Starship for a long time, and after its recent success, they just made new offers for SpaceX.
    Find out everything in today's episode of Techmap.
    We all know about Starship's incredible payload capacity, right? It's projected to carry up to 200 tons in the future, taking humans and cargo to the stars. But before that, once it becomes operational, it will be used to launch Starshield satellites into space. Do you know about the Starshield program? It's very new, quite new compared to the history of SpaceX. Let me give you an overview.
    US Military New Massive Demand For SpaceX's Starship After Flight 4!
    It can be said that it evolved from Starlink. If you've been following the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, you would see the significant role Starlink has played in supporting Ukraine, both militarily and civilly. It ensures uninterrupted communication for the Ukrainian military when their internet and communication networks are destroyed, while also aiding them in defending and attacking Russian positions.
    US Military New Massive Demand For SpaceX's Starship After Flight 4!
    Starshield is much more powerful and capable than that. It's a program developed by SpaceX specifically for military purposes, serving only the United States government as its client. It includes specially designed low-orbit satellites that build upon the capabilities of Starlink, with the added ability to carry payloads, perform target tracking, optical and radio reconnaissance, and provide early missile warnings. These are indeed remarkable capabilities for monitoring and safeguarding airspace. It's no exaggeration to say that Starshield is like a system of eyes in space for the United States.
    ===
    Subcribe TechMap: tinyurl.com/3z5ysrtf

КОМЕНТАРІ • 91

  • @Phillip_Reese
    @Phillip_Reese 10 днів тому +8

    I love SpaceX and all the disruptive industries supported by Elon, but I'd like to see soon Starship rising to the skies with those 200tons.

  • @bio-techlarry9602
    @bio-techlarry9602 10 днів тому +2

    Who ever controls the high ground controls the battle and eventually the war.

  • @sanjosemike3137
    @sanjosemike3137 10 днів тому +1

    I have never worried about the FAA or the environmental lobby. I knew from the start that Elon Musk is considered a "national treasure" by our military. I would surmise he has already signed contracts with them for billions of dollars.
    Sanjosemike (no longer in CA)

  • @MichaelSTaylor
    @MichaelSTaylor 10 днів тому +2

    SpaceX Starshield
    First I've heard of this program, it's got its own Wikipedia page. There are six already in orbit. I think the idea of these things up in the sky is equally unsettling and reassuring. It's also, inevitable. From the reassuring aspect, I think it is possible for technology like this to help intercept attacks from rogue global actors. (An SDI Star wars that actually works)
    It's also getting really crowded up there and it wouldn't take all that much to ruin satellites for just about everybody. And starshield satellites would be a prime target for attacks that precipitate the Kessler syndrome.
    And when you drift too far into thinking starshield would be a bad idea, it doesn't take too much additional thought to think, "well what if other nations had defensive capabilities against attack and we didn't? Who would go on unscathed if there was such an attack?"
    It's like the atomic bomb. It sucks that it exists but it would really suck if the Nazis had it and we didn't.
    I just hope that we are just mature enough as a species to use this kind of technology as a way to protect and preserve and further the best of humanity instead of set it back in unimaginable ways.

    • @techmap9
      @techmap9  9 днів тому

      You are right. I think that Elon never wants his products serving human are controlled by fascists

  • @stephensfarms7165
    @stephensfarms7165 10 днів тому

    Thanks great video 👍👍🌟

  • @jameskelly9457
    @jameskelly9457 10 днів тому +4

    “ If it can land on the moon it can land on the ground”?
    That is a stupid statement that seems to forget about the difference in gravity and oxygen in the air.

    • @The1QwertySky
      @The1QwertySky 10 днів тому

      Yeah,...but it can land on ground

    • @geraldfichtner
      @geraldfichtner 10 днів тому

      yup 6 X more gravity on earth ever hear of a little thing called free Fall? ask TWA 800 or the people off the towers of 911

  • @crushednutts8934
    @crushednutts8934 10 днів тому +2

    Tell D.C. to pound sand. I do every day.

  • @UchihaYugi
    @UchihaYugi 10 днів тому +1

    Funny how they mention how Starlink helps Ukraine, but doesn't mention when it was shut down when a bunch of drones were about to sink a lot of the Russian fleet.

  • @rosspayne2235
    @rosspayne2235 10 днів тому

    I'm pretty sure space x and GFL are in biz together 😊

  • @bio-techlarry9602
    @bio-techlarry9602 10 днів тому +4

    Landing on an Aircraft Carrier? Yes you could land it on a carrier, but why? The heat from rocket blast of the engines with a heavy payload would damage all kinds of equipment normally used on the deck. Not to mention the damage to the deck its self and be in calm to dead calm seas.

    • @UchihaYugi
      @UchihaYugi 10 днів тому +1

      Yep, you'd have to add a proprietary platform ship to the convoy, or some sort of new foldable system to a carrier. Pft, I don't know.

  • @cyrillawless
    @cyrillawless 8 днів тому

    What would happen to star ship if it did a delivery to a ship, would it have fuel to fly home or will they just push it over the side🤔

  • @danogeto78
    @danogeto78 6 днів тому

    Aliens are laughing

  • @brendabolling3424
    @brendabolling3424 10 днів тому

    🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🚀

  • @stanleydavidson6543
    @stanleydavidson6543 10 днів тому

    No nucks in space,Not to launch from space,but we might need a space tug.

  • @user-kb7md8qm9o
    @user-kb7md8qm9o 10 днів тому

    We have 9,900 satellites already around Earth how many is too many just a question

  • @wbwarren57
    @wbwarren57 10 днів тому +1

    Great video! I don’t think it’s a question of if the department of defense will essentially own SpaceX, but when. As you detail in this video, the DOD may already own SpaceX in terms of dictating what SpaceX is going to develop and when. This is not really a bad thing, because the capabilities that SpaceX builds for the department of defense can certainly be applied to civilian uses just as the Apollo program was. Also, given the erratic nature of Elon, having the department of defense there to make certain that SpaceX continues to be run in a professional mannerwill actually be a plus.

    • @squirrelsinjacket1804
      @squirrelsinjacket1804 10 днів тому

      They use contracts, which is common in gov't and private projects. I can see the military very much wanting the capability to drop 150 tons worth of equipment anywhere on the planet within an hour or so. If SpaceX is able to get the tanker portion of the program working, it seems the military would just need to build the launch tower and arms at the remote site with SpaceX help. Then the booster/starship launches, both refuel in orbit, land on site/unload/load cargo, get stacked, then launch back into orbit, then land again back at SpaceX to do it all over again.

  • @challenger2ultralightadventure
    @challenger2ultralightadventure 10 днів тому +4

    Drop the AI voice! It sucks.

  • @kurtjensen7264
    @kurtjensen7264 10 днів тому +1

    Elon Musk. Wants to use his technology to go to Mars. 🚀 clearly the US military has other ideas. 😬

    • @asjeot
      @asjeot 10 днів тому

      Do both.

  • @sanguinarium1614
    @sanguinarium1614 10 днів тому +2

    Is this how the USA is promoting peace around the world?

    • @Luckyrider1958
      @Luckyrider1958 10 днів тому

      by successful space travel ?? And communications??

    • @BugsbunnyEh
      @BugsbunnyEh 10 днів тому

      America is a big joke i mean the government, i hope those American who struggle deserver more like free health care, education.

    • @Lee-fc3yf
      @Lee-fc3yf 10 днів тому +1

      Jesus, were you born yesterday. Let me help you, the human species have been at war since records began and will continue too. Under recent Empires there has been Unprecendented levels of peace and gloabal prosperity guarenteed by a very big stick called the US Military. No Global shipping without the US Navy etc, peace sis obtained by threat surely you can understand this?

    • @notyouraveragegoldenpotato
      @notyouraveragegoldenpotato 10 днів тому

      Around the atmosphere. And if you have a problem with it (and more often than not- you don't have a problem with it but you have strategic resources) then we'll bring 'Democracy' to you too😅

    • @Luckyrider1958
      @Luckyrider1958 9 днів тому

      @@BugsbunnyEh Nothing in life is free.

  • @danboy6681
    @danboy6681 10 днів тому

    Do you think that we could land a Star Ship on an aircraft carrier???
    Wow , that would be amazing!!!

  • @timhowell6929
    @timhowell6929 10 днів тому +2

    Blah blah blah… WHEN CAN I INVEST IN SPACEX ELON? 😂

  • @PanioloBee
    @PanioloBee 10 днів тому

    How many MIRVs can Starship deploy? 😂

    • @techmap9
      @techmap9  10 днів тому

      "MIRV" what does it mean

    • @benyomovod6904
      @benyomovod6904 10 днів тому

      Multiple
      Intercontinental
      Return
      Vehicles

    • @techmap9
      @techmap9  10 днів тому

      @@benyomovod6904 okay, I got it, thanks a lot

    • @techmap9
      @techmap9  10 днів тому

      they are on the way toward that goal

  • @genonote228
    @genonote228 10 днів тому

    Forget SpaceX, let Boeing do it says NASA ... 😮😮😮

    • @rolanddeschain965
      @rolanddeschain965 10 днів тому

      Are those 2 astronauts really going to get into that thing Tuesday? Boeing desperately needs the humiliation of dragon going to get them.

    • @genonote228
      @genonote228 10 днів тому +1

      @@rolanddeschain965 , they can always go back in the Russian capsule...

    • @rolanddeschain965
      @rolanddeschain965 10 днів тому

      Theres already a dragon docked but the seats are spoken for. I just know i wouldnt want to fly that thing home.​@@genonote228

  • @rogerrussell9544
    @rogerrussell9544 10 днів тому +1

    Let them over pay for the Boeing Starliner 737 max.

    • @techmap9
      @techmap9  9 днів тому

      OMG, are u kidding me ?

  • @1978rayking
    @1978rayking 10 днів тому

    China has a quantum satellite 🛰

    • @The1QwertySky
      @The1QwertySky 10 днів тому

      😂

    • @mikewallace8087
      @mikewallace8087 10 днів тому

      China has everything Americans learned , 250,000 + chinese go to higher education schools in America.

  • @MarcGoudreau
    @MarcGoudreau 10 днів тому +1

    Our world is on the brink of nuclear war and Elon Musk big success is developing a rocket that realises Ronald Regan's insane "Star Wars" initiative of launching nuclear warheads from Earths orbit... and OH-Boy is that something to celebrate. 21st century humanity has gone completely insane :(

    • @techmap9
      @techmap9  9 днів тому

      Thanks for sharing

    • @redpillcommando
      @redpillcommando 9 днів тому

      Please provide a reference for Ronald Regan's "Initiative for launching nuclear warheads from Earths orbit". I ask because I believe you are mistaken or just bald faced making it up as you go along. Star Wars was about intercepting incoming warheads with lasers, microwave lasers and conventional warheads. Not atomic weapons in orbit. Anyone who tells you Regan wanted to put nukes in orbit is lying to you.

  • @Drew-zu7jb
    @Drew-zu7jb 10 днів тому +2

    Yeah! AI commentating sucks!!!!!

  • @AydenVr7
    @AydenVr7 10 днів тому +1

    this is a fake video

  • @Antagon666
    @Antagon666 10 днів тому

    Yup, completely empty rocket barely makes it to orbit and then borderline burns up in the atmosphere. What a throbbing success.
    Very reusable and utilizable so far.

    • @killbotter6998
      @killbotter6998 10 днів тому +1

      1st it didnt "barely" made it into orbit. It wasnt in orbit at all, it was precisely put into such a suborbital trajectory that it wouldnt end up as massive unsteerable spacejunk.
      2nd compared to all competitor orbital rockets it was a mission success, as a payload could have been deployed, if an actual orbit would have been aimed for.
      No other rocket of a compareablr magnitute has ever physically attempted what starship did with sl4

    • @rolanddeschain965
      @rolanddeschain965 10 днів тому +1

      You could just admit to being a clueless Elon hater? Oh, I see a crowd, better go follow it!!

    • @darkknight097
      @darkknight097 10 днів тому +1

      Thankfully, real progressive is not run by people like you.
      We'd still be in the stone age if everyone had the attitude of "well, it didnt work first, try so scrap the entire thing!"

    • @Antagon666
      @Antagon666 10 днів тому

      @@rolanddeschain965 you've just defined Elmo's cult of NPCs.

    • @rolanddeschain965
      @rolanddeschain965 10 днів тому

      ​@@darkknight097first try? Starliner is 50 year old technology. It's the Apollo project 2.0

  • @mikecronan550
    @mikecronan550 10 днів тому +2

    DON'T CAVE TO THE MILITARY USE!