PHILOSOPHY - Sartre

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 лис 2014
  • Jean-Paul Sartre explored the problems and joys of being fundamentally free. Existentialism, the belief system with which he is associated, considers the anguish of freedom.
    Enjoying our UA-cam videos? Get full access to all our audio content, videos, and thousands of thought-provoking articles, conversation cards and more with The School of Life Subscription: t.ly/HPrJP
    Be more mindful, present and inspired. Get the best of The School of Life delivered straight to your inbox: t.ly/uOg31
    FURTHER READING
    “Jean-Paul Sartre was born in 1905. His father, a navy captain, died when he was a baby - and he grew up extremely close to his mother until she remarried, much to his regret, when he was twelve. Sartre spent most of his life in Paris, where he often went to cafes on the Left Bank and sat on benches in the Jardin du Luxembourg. He had a strabismus, a wandering eye, and wore distinctive, heavy glasses. He was awarded the 1964 Nobel Prize for literature, but refused it on the grounds that the award was capitalist and bourgeois. He was very short (five feet three inches) and frequently described himself as ugly. He wore his hair vigorously brushed back. When he died in 1980 (aged 74), 50,000 people accompanied his coffin through the streets of Paris...”
    MORE SCHOOL OF LIFE
    Watch more films on PHILOSOPHY in our playlist:
    bit.ly/TSOLphilosophy
    SOCIAL MEDIA
    Feel free to follow us at the links below:
    Facebook: / theschooloflifelondon
    X: / theschooloflife
    Instagram: / theschooloflifelondon
    CREDITS
    Produced in collaboration with:
    Mad Adam
    www.madadamfilms.co.uk #TheSchoolOfLife

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,8 тис.

  • @OpEditorial
    @OpEditorial 2 роки тому +1468

    Descartes: "I think therefore I am"
    Sartre: "I overthink, therefore what even am I?!"

    • @franciscofarias6385
      @franciscofarias6385 2 роки тому +11

      lol this is a good one

    • @navis5284
      @navis5284 2 роки тому +48

      Descartes: "I think therefore I am."
      Sartre: "I think therefore I am, I think..."

    • @stanmyler9037
      @stanmyler9037 2 роки тому +9

      Well hm. Yeah.
      Another interesting variation on that - the Celebrated "Cogito ergo sum" - taken out of Ambrose Bierce's satiric "Devil's dictionary" presented to you to ponder on is
      ".....The dictum might be improved, howerver, thus: Cogito Cogito ergo Cogito Sum - 'I think that I think, therefore I think that I am;'- as close an approach to certainly as any philosopher has yet made."
      :)

    • @laurentiustefan398
      @laurentiustefan398 2 роки тому +2

      LOL

    • @nsbd90now
      @nsbd90now Рік тому +14

      New classic bathroom stall graffiti for philosophy departments! "To be is to do. To do is to be. Do be do be do says Frank Sinatra."

  • @Michael-jf7np
    @Michael-jf7np 3 роки тому +1885

    "Hello, sir. I will be your waiter this evening." - attentive waiter
    "Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man." - Sartre

    • @aysoodaagh3167
      @aysoodaagh3167 3 роки тому +9

      Haha((:

    • @parlay-music
      @parlay-music 3 роки тому +21

      I just dropped in, to see what condition that my waiter was in

    • @bhwre
      @bhwre 3 роки тому +22

      The dude abides.

    • @LucienStaarink
      @LucienStaarink 3 роки тому +1

      That doesn't sound like Sartre, but like Bernie Glassman Roshi!
      'It's just my opinion man!
      '

    • @theodoranfilov5101
      @theodoranfilov5101 3 роки тому +9

      No Donnie, they are existencialists, no need to worry.

  • @SydAliHsn
    @SydAliHsn 3 роки тому +147

    who else just gets a sudden existentialism crisis when they focus on someone's face they have known and have been seeing for a long time and it turns out that they look nothing like you think they do.

  • @utkukurban147
    @utkukurban147 2 роки тому +591

    I remember the first time i had a moment of absurdity. I was talking to my mother and all of a sudden i saw her as if I have never seen her, as if she was a complete stranger to me. And when i told her that in that very instant she could not understand it. I hope everyone can fell such moments. It is really invigorating.

    • @nicolaskoukoutsis8562
      @nicolaskoukoutsis8562 2 роки тому +38

      I've had such experiences as a child but they have always felt deeply unsettling to me. I remember having such a momentary shift in conciousness in class in elementary school and all I wanted was to go home and be alone.

    • @san99972
      @san99972 Рік тому +17

      same and with my mother too. i also told her that it feels weird that you're a random woman and my mother. she was like "i gave birth to you i know you since birth" and stuff. i was like well thats not what i meant

    • @whatisiswhatable
      @whatisiswhatable Рік тому

      Cool

    • @arnav257
      @arnav257 Рік тому +8

      I know precisely what that feels like - I had them quite often as a child, but they wane with time. For some reason, I used to think of these moments as thresholds for true internalisations of that which evoked the sensation. I wonder if these moments make such things (or people, in the case you mentioned) become part of you in ways other things cannot be.

    • @ritimasahikiya
      @ritimasahikiya Рік тому +3

      yes man, i have had moment of absurdities since childhood. The first time was when I was looking at a tap in my bathroom

  • @fermiLiquidDrinker
    @fermiLiquidDrinker 7 років тому +1072

    "One eye on the intrinsic meaninglessness of life, and another on the bitches."

    • @fermiLiquidDrinker
      @fermiLiquidDrinker 7 років тому +57

      any wallsocket That's why you have the other eye on the bitches.

    • @tonyjohnsen3160
      @tonyjohnsen3160 7 років тому +8

      King Crimson!

    • @andremuniz6623
      @andremuniz6623 6 років тому +8

      Bubbadoobop this, this needs to be on the cover of every book Sartre ever wrote...

    • @ravikantbhatt1
      @ravikantbhatt1 6 років тому

      Bubbadoobop niceeeeee

    • @avery-quinnmaddox5985
      @avery-quinnmaddox5985 6 років тому

      Bubbadoobop
      My everyday life as a lesbian philosopher. 😂😂

  • @Charvack
    @Charvack 4 роки тому +650

    Bus conductor: sir please take a seat.
    Sartre: What do you mean by seat?

  • @bailinnumberguy
    @bailinnumberguy 6 років тому +473

    Whenever I get somewhat depressed I read Sartre or Kierkegaard. They remind me that my life is utterly meaningless and my depression implies that I should give a shit about anything.

    • @angieyeah1793
      @angieyeah1793 2 роки тому

      Good idea

    • @jordandthornburg
      @jordandthornburg 2 роки тому +21

      Your depression is telling you they’re wrong

    • @dripstein6130
      @dripstein6130 2 роки тому +3

      Lmao that’s the saddest thing I’ve read in a while lol. Death to the nihilists

    • @tac6044
      @tac6044 2 роки тому

      Start here ua-cam.com/video/EDqqB8kh_Ek/v-deo.html

    • @acrux1918
      @acrux1918 2 роки тому +50

      That's not where existentialism ends. If you just end it there, it's nihilism. There being no set meaning to life means you can assign whatever you want to it.

  • @PlasmaCoolantLeak
    @PlasmaCoolantLeak 4 роки тому +843

    Sartre died and arrived in Heaven. St. Peter showed him around, showing the gardens, the animals, the people.
    Sartre: "It's nice, but not what I imagined."
    St. Peter: "What did you imagine?"
    Sartre: "Nothing."

    • @akinlajaakinwande8177
      @akinlajaakinwande8177 3 роки тому +3

      Good one.

    • @Yzjoshuwave
      @Yzjoshuwave 2 роки тому +3

      Have you seen or read No Exit? There are several performances of it up on UA-cam.

    • @TheBigMclargehuge
      @TheBigMclargehuge 2 роки тому +14

      it's funny because a socialist got into heaven

    • @charlieclark9552
      @charlieclark9552 2 роки тому +1

      Well, pal there is something so the downside of this place is you can no longer think about nothing, because from now into eternity, you are something

    • @ajarofmayonnaise3250
      @ajarofmayonnaise3250 2 роки тому +17

      @@TheBigMclargehuge socialism is when no heaven.

  • @KittySnicker
    @KittySnicker 8 років тому +2124

    I've had those moments of absurdity frequently, where I'll think about how weird a word is, for instance.

  • @ChaseTheHorizons
    @ChaseTheHorizons 7 років тому +603

    'Another being who's genitals you sometimes touch' thats just what I call all of my significant others

    • @IronWarrior4Ever
      @IronWarrior4Ever 7 років тому +64

      It's a great pick up line, 'Hey will you be someone whose genitals I can sometimes touch?'

    • @remagairsoftllc
      @remagairsoftllc 5 років тому +47

      You: My significant other
      Me, an intellectual: Another being whose genitals I sometimes touch.

    • @adamkilby2273
      @adamkilby2273 5 років тому +25

      I call her my intercourse associate.

    • @michaelfeeney369
      @michaelfeeney369 5 років тому +7

      I wonder if people get these feelings when they go walk their dog and pick up its shit.

    • @kingdomofthesaintful
      @kingdomofthesaintful 4 роки тому +1

      significant otter

  • @TheBaaLambChampion
    @TheBaaLambChampion 3 роки тому +113

    Philosophy is such an invigorating force for me. When I hear a new idea and have it instantly resonate with my own feelings and thoughts, it is a feeling like no other. This also underlines the idea that your every feeling and thought has already been experienced and widely explored by others in the past, put into words and described by philosophical writers at length.
    I am so fortunate to understand the implications of this... how important reading is, educating oneself, and how these things help deepen the understanding of yourself and the world. What an impact consistent study of this kind of material has over time... even if it's just 5-10 pages of a book a day, or a single video like this - the effect is cumulative.
    It's what Stephen Covey would call a Quadrant II activity (Not-Urgen and Important), but what most people would not even think of as important.

  • @stoned8708
    @stoned8708 3 роки тому +770

    lowkey, sartre probably was a good philosopher because his lazy eye could look into another dimension

    • @rego3377
      @rego3377 3 роки тому +30

      I see where you got that name.

    • @JasminaaaSingh
      @JasminaaaSingh 3 роки тому +2

      Lol dude

    • @zel5522
      @zel5522 3 роки тому

      lol

    • @simfoniaco
      @simfoniaco 2 роки тому

      That's exactly what I thought while they explained the scene of the chair.

    • @reneportillo532
      @reneportillo532 2 роки тому

      He also liked kids. To much I would say.

  • @LunaLu-00
    @LunaLu-00 7 років тому +458

    "The admission that life doesn't have preordained logic and is not inherently meaningful can be a source of immense relief when we feel oppressed by the weight of tradition and the status quo"

    • @justwannabehappy6735
      @justwannabehappy6735 7 років тому +60

      And it can also be an incredible source of anguish when we realize that the burden of giving sense and value rest solely upon our shoulder, and that, in the end, we are ultimately responsible for everything that happens to us.

    • @LunaLu-00
      @LunaLu-00 7 років тому +4

      Yup, very much so!

    • @contemplativeidiot1
      @contemplativeidiot1 2 роки тому +15

      @@justwannabehappy6735 Existentialism does not claim you or we collectively, are responsible for everything that happens. It does however claim that the meaning of those happenings is not in anyway inherent and therefore we can shape it in the way we choose. Many things happen to people that they cannot control. The meaning or impact these phenomena have can to some degree be divergent however.

    • @Zaidproductionz
      @Zaidproductionz 2 роки тому +3

      Bruh…. Was scrolling down the comments while watching towards the end of the video. As soon as I started reading yours…. Me reading in my mind, and him, synced up and confirmed that life surely is a simulation. We are all living a big big lie. Life will never be the same after this. Unless my sim master decides to delete this happening from my memory and tomorrow will be all fine again. Until then…. death be upon until the Sims are pleased! Stay safe. Jk.

    • @ADUAquascaping
      @ADUAquascaping 4 місяці тому

      ​​​​​@@contemplativeidiot1Except when someone's central nervous system is altered from severe abuse. They can't merely decide to define the experience based on some ideal or thought because the trauma response is somatic. Philosophy doesn't nullify objective outcomes and inherent meaning.
      There is inherent meaning in life. What is it? Go look around... the meaning is to exist and for the universe to increase its complexity because that is exactly what is happening. Life is meaning. The peak of being is being. The universal laws of complexity and determinism are real because mathematics transcends our limited senses, including thought, and philosophy is bound to thought. Thinking is merely one of our senses. Philosophy is inherently constipated. How is life not inherently significant?
      The universe existing is meaningful. We exist in a universe and are alive, but none of it is significant? That actually makes absolutely no sense. It's denying the fundamental laws of our universe. It's as if philosophers are proclaiming that they understand the entirety of the universe while using their limited senses! How ridiculous and delusional!
      Hey, the universe exists and it has laws, but they are insignificant. Oh, says who? Some guy who thinks too much. Oh, thanks for the enlightenment 😂

  • @ihazthots
    @ihazthots 8 років тому +2726

    You know you're onto something if the FBI maintains a file on your actions.

    • @OHYS
      @OHYS 6 років тому +16

      Linton S. Dawson, this made me smile

    • @superleipoman
      @superleipoman 6 років тому +35

      Probably because he liked Marxist ideas...? I say before I watch the video.
      I was right :D
      It's one thing though to be free but one cannot deny the scarcity of goods. I don't see why being less materialistic should be the responsibility of the rest of society, rather than yourself. Plus, if you come from a "high rated country" you can go to pretty much any country in the world if you really want to.

    • @davidmarshall3683
      @davidmarshall3683 6 років тому +21

      By your logic ISIS terrorists or terrorist sympathisers are on to something, of course they kept tabs on him he was talking to their enemies.

    • @superleipoman
      @superleipoman 6 років тому +18

      The main problem with communism is that everyone should want to be communist. Honestly, that just doesn't make sense, especially when you find yourself in a job that is simply worse than another. I'd rather be a lawyer than a sewage worker, but if all pay is equal, I might as well be a stock boy. So now, if I have to be a sewage worker, I'm going to be angry.
      So you may say true communism has no leaders, but without goverment force no society is going to exist.
      And that's just one aspect of ignoring inevitable reality. Another example: some black market is going to exist, thus communism is undermined.

    • @AAfif-gd4px
      @AAfif-gd4px 6 років тому +11

      Einstein had an FBI file too, so yeah.

  • @samrobinson5761
    @samrobinson5761 5 років тому +99

    the satrian description of an evening meal is quality

  • @jamiemcmillan6742
    @jamiemcmillan6742 5 років тому +56

    Sartre had a unique perspective. It's almost as if he could see in two directions at once...
    I enjoy these summary videos about philosophers. I feel like an expert on philosophy now XD

  • @juliuskull
    @juliuskull 8 років тому +4062

    Satre's philosophy is classical stoner philosophy. "Seat.... whaaat?"

    • @Demention94
      @Demention94 8 років тому +50

      No. Stoner would say "seat..sleep"

    • @kylemelones8594
      @kylemelones8594 8 років тому +290

      +Julius Air Kull I've thought about this a lot. People tend to trivialize the frequent epiphanies of stoners, because they aren't often properly articulated. But (despite the ineloquence of most stoners) society has still delegitimized something legitimate. Stoners are quite possibly thinking the same thoughts as great philosophers, and do not have the foundational knowledge to recognize it. Which is why stoners are amazed by things like trees and buildings and, yes, seats. And don't even get me started on other psychedelic drugs...

    • @empty_cognizance2234
      @empty_cognizance2234 8 років тому +18

      +Kyle Melones I smiled while I was shaving earlier today. I used to think my teeth were white...they are OFFwhite.
      (paraphrasing Mitch Hedberg off the top of my head)

    • @bunnyTTtango
      @bunnyTTtango 8 років тому

      +Julius Air Kull wow, tru

    • @g-wen6875
      @g-wen6875 8 років тому +44

      +Kyle Melones I haven't actually smoked, but I think that pot actually gives one a kind of disinhibition... They aren't really aware of what's socially acceptable for example. Everything they saw as "known" and "true" suddenly becomes source of questioning.
      The same thing happens when you repeat a word over and over, it isn't something you were taught to do, and isn't something you actually are expected to do... You become free of expectation and begin to question how a bunch of letters could actually mean something... Even though that's what you were taught.

  • @TomboTime
    @TomboTime 8 років тому +777

    "You don't arrest Voltaire"
    haha . . . rad.

    • @JordanALAllen
      @JordanALAllen 5 років тому +10

      Apologies for my ignorance, but what was meant by this may I ask?

    • @luisotaviosantanadeoliveir1217
      @luisotaviosantanadeoliveir1217 5 років тому +65

      @@JordanALAllenI believe it refers to the episode in which they asked French President Charles de Gaulle to arrest Sartre, because of his engagement with leftist ideals. Then the President replied: "you don't arrest Voltaire" wich ackowledge how important Sartre was, putting him side by side to the french writer and philoshopher Voltaire.

    • @Thejampacker
      @Thejampacker 4 роки тому

      Who is ‘you’ in this quote... Cause the French certainly did arrest Voltaire.

    • @googlestinkt6647
      @googlestinkt6647 4 роки тому +1

      @gary grine They were both free thinkers, with a realtively large following. I guess you could say they were influencers haha. I don't think he was comparing them in weight of brain matter, but in how the public would react to them beeing locked up, as fighters of freedom.

    • @samluke8121
      @samluke8121 4 роки тому

      @@googlestinkt6647 A fighter fore freedom who admired Fidel Castro? Oh how brilliant.....

  • @AKNeal81
    @AKNeal81 4 роки тому +18

    "...the weight of tradition and the status quo." The descriptive term for my issue with society today that I've been searching for most of my life. This channel is like free therapy! Proud to be a "Student of Life"

  • @ClassiicMe
    @ClassiicMe 5 років тому +12

    The interesting thing about Sartre is that the general idea of his philosophy is quite simple and easy to understand, but his delivery is incredibly confusing almost as if he’s proving the point of the absurdity of the world. He’s by far my favorite philosopher and my favorite philosophy.

  • @Mr8lacklp
    @Mr8lacklp 8 років тому +1567

    This moment when police are trying to understand your philosophy but fail.

    • @kx7500
      @kx7500 4 роки тому +25

      Jannis because if they did maybe they wouldn’t be policing it

    • @selina6107
      @selina6107 3 роки тому

      @Quinn Murph oh shush you silly bean, there is much more behind it than just a burning building

    • @selina6107
      @selina6107 3 роки тому

      @Jesus Christ you just don’t get it

    • @outaspaceman
      @outaspaceman 3 роки тому

      “Oops-a-Daisy, sir..
      You appear to have fallen downstairs..”

    • @sakariaskoivisto1471
      @sakariaskoivisto1471 2 роки тому +5

      I didnt know police could read.

  • @MrColdJin
    @MrColdJin 9 років тому +325

    Is it normal if I felt like clapping at the end of the video?
    Jokes aside, to whoever actually makes these: thank you.

    • @davidfalcao335
      @davidfalcao335 9 років тому +8

      ***** yes it is. I felt something similar after experiencing this, and other videos of this channel. Plato's feature is also an eye opening piece o media. It's amazing to see how much we are actually moving backwards as thinking beings rather then pursuing the thaughts and riches these men have gave us all that actually think.

    • @foxfire1345
      @foxfire1345 9 років тому +5

      ***** im glad im not the only one , whenever the video finishes i always felt a sudden awe with my eyes fixed on one place, and just saying wow or bravo. its thats good.

    • @kevindreslin5925
      @kevindreslin5925 9 років тому +3

      ***** Think of it this way, we applaud to show another person (or persons) that we enjoyed whatever they have an association with, so why show your appreciation in a way that the other person cannot see or hear?
      Sorry, I like to watch these videos when I'm high.

    • @mrtambourineman6107
      @mrtambourineman6107 4 роки тому

      I make jokes all the time bud

    • @KOREAyoungwoo
      @KOREAyoungwoo 4 роки тому

      There is no normal

  • @WelingtonVeiga
    @WelingtonVeiga 5 років тому +3

    It's awesome how you can explain his thoughts with that simplicity. Thank you for that.

  • @boonejones7373
    @boonejones7373 Рік тому +5

    This helps when I feel too caught up in the outcome of something; like a job offer or school admission. As a human I have unlimited potential, but it's easy to feel like there's a way things should go, and if they don't go that way is a frightening idea. Keeping the idea of not acting in bad faith is important to not feeling overwhelmingly stuck

  • @danielamartinez8939
    @danielamartinez8939 6 років тому +26

    It's incredible that people who have different pasts, different languages, different countries, different cultures, different ages etc... Have come to the same conclusion or idea. Without reading any of his works I got exactly the same ideas in the same order. Things are weirder than we think, and because of that we are free. It's almost like we were connected somehow to an unconscious universal knowledge

  • @cldreyer1756
    @cldreyer1756 8 років тому +736

    I'm not high enough to think about existentialism.

    • @tookool4school
      @tookool4school 8 років тому +38

      +Gnōsis high enough or sad enough?

    • @abegohr2576
      @abegohr2576 6 років тому +6

      Bananasauce High, because of drugs

    • @beauknows1677
      @beauknows1677 6 років тому +2

      - ̗̀Ḡeᾔøη ̖́- you not being high is enough to understand it.

    • @eltonparks659
      @eltonparks659 6 років тому

      Lol !!

    • @danNo_nin0
      @danNo_nin0 5 років тому +1

      I think the word is: "depressed", not "high"

  • @sunsetguy37
    @sunsetguy37 5 років тому +4

    Weird how ideas from a man long gone, so accurately match the thinking of my own internal landscape...great clip; thanks!

  • @themarquis336
    @themarquis336 5 років тому +1

    Brilliant people who have walked the Earth and the brilliant ideas they had. It makes me so emotional.

  • @slappybigalow8971
    @slappybigalow8971 7 років тому +1711

    So... The land of milk and honey is actually the land of animal secretions.

    • @KevinSpencerTV
      @KevinSpencerTV 6 років тому +5

      Slappy Bigalow Yo slappy

    • @michaelocallaghan1163
      @michaelocallaghan1163 5 років тому +6

      Slappy Bigalow hope you dont mind if i quote your succinct existential symopsis. Ha ha ha. Very good.

    • @taiyihanle
      @taiyihanle 5 років тому +2

      @André Victor Yes

    • @michaelfeeney369
      @michaelfeeney369 5 років тому +2

      It is all in your head... but you won't get what I mean.

    • @POVShotgun
      @POVShotgun 5 років тому +5

      Bodily secretions

  • @SilasF1sher
    @SilasF1sher 8 років тому +449

    Wow I've been thinking very similarly to Sartre for so long and am only now learning of him (thanks public education); favorite philosopher so far.

    • @FiisforMichael
      @FiisforMichael 8 років тому +14

      +Silas Fisher In defence of public education, Sartre would probably prefer it to private education or no education, Marx definitely would.
      can it be improved? yes.
      Is it something to blame for not knowing certain aspects of life and academia? I'd say no
      respect for being free thinking and getting sartre's ideas without knowing of him though. also one of my favorites

    • @ultimatereviewer01
      @ultimatereviewer01 6 років тому +1

      Silas Fisher Exact same case here

    • @khaledyasser8293
      @khaledyasser8293 6 років тому +3

      Silas Fisher I don't think you should call this guy your favorite philosopher out of all people because it makes this sort of thinking possible: Oh there is no meaning to life? Ok then what could possibly make life's struggles worth it? Because if you truly see the world as a bunch of moving atoms and nothing more then what's the point of living? Well I guess I'll just shoot myself, then I wouldn't have to deal with all of life's tragedies

    • @1337Olympia
      @1337Olympia 6 років тому +8

      I view my life as having no meaning other than the long term meaning of continuing the human race. I believe this way of thought was the biggest influencer in helping me cope with my depression. As soon as I saw the world for what it is, i no longer cared to be judged as different. Instead of conforming to what the society expected of me, I have begun to learn what I value and I have begun to pursue my dreams. Though i do understand if someone wanted to they could say their moral code allows for killing... but that is why we have a government. they set a baseline for what we all value and punish those who defy it.

    • @khaledyasser8293
      @khaledyasser8293 6 років тому +2

      Karl Briegel If your only motivation was the survival of the human race you wouldn't have a morality. For example killing old people and unproductive people would be completely justified. Cloning and genetically editing babies would also be completely justified. Heck science itself would NOT be justified because when the enlightenment happened I doubt anyone expected to be able to cure polio after a few centuries so there would have been no reason to research. See how this also doesn't work? Most people SAY they believe in certain philosophies but almost everyone believes in higher values in the end (some call that God)

  • @marcpadilla1094
    @marcpadilla1094 4 роки тому +1

    Simple concepts with very elaborate explanations. I really love thst about philosophy because you can't remember any of it in detail unless you study it. Like mental gymnastics. Very elegant.

  • @gsamsa
    @gsamsa 4 роки тому

    I’ve never done drugs but I’ve experienced a lot of loneliness and watching this explained a lot of the things I’ve been going through. Driving one moment, and then next being scared out of my mind of this strange circular wheel that have two slabs of meat on them.

  • @talynhastime9343
    @talynhastime9343 6 років тому +127

    Oh my God there's a man that has basically defined what I've been feeling increasingly for the past year. Thank God.

  • @GavinKirby
    @GavinKirby 8 років тому +422

    If you weren't also born in 1905 you'll probably want to know that "5 feet 3 inches" is medievalspeak for 1.60 m.

    • @idwerk
      @idwerk 5 років тому +57

      I'm American so I know what it is but you are right: imperial measurements are completely idiotic.

    • @fargothbosmer2059
      @fargothbosmer2059 5 років тому +8

      Rule Britania

    • @isaactrabuco3365
      @isaactrabuco3365 5 років тому

      Thanks hahaha

    • @vukathers
      @vukathers 4 роки тому +1

      Fargoth Bosmer the metric system is french tho

    • @splodge5714
      @splodge5714 4 роки тому

      5ft 3 sounds just great to me. Very descriptive...a little guy.

  • @DonCarlosHormozi
    @DonCarlosHormozi 2 роки тому +3

    I read "Being and Nothingness" years ago. I picked up the book in Inchon Airport. I finished it, however, it was very very hard to understand. It was like higher math put into words. You had to fully understand premises from the beginning to understand what came next. It wasn't like most books that you could kind of glide over and understood by context. But that was my experience. I read other books by Sartre and had no difficulty. Thanks for posting.

  • @continentalgin
    @continentalgin Рік тому

    Brilliant! I love his short stories, too.

  • @Banjaari
    @Banjaari 8 років тому +4

    The quintessential meaning of life, on point.
    Much thanks to the curators of the video. Being a Psych major, and having Philosophy as a minor can be crushing. The 6 minute gist about Sartre was really helpful to get an overview of Existentialist routes without digging deep into pages.
    Kudos!

  • @kealohabraceros7617
    @kealohabraceros7617 6 років тому +34

    Nausea is an amazing book and really gives some insight into the ideas of Sartre and how they play out in real life.

  • @Luca-qk2lr
    @Luca-qk2lr 2 роки тому +8

    So I am VERY new to philosophy, and this man kind of just met a certain part of me. It's like he describes one of my favourite societal characters I put on, which is the essence of the "Me" I know... It's weird to describe but he touched a part of my ideology and physical presence that is undeniably an unchangable part of me. Like the basis of me.

    • @CJ-pt8sg
      @CJ-pt8sg 2 роки тому

      How do you start getting into philosophy? I’m only here because I’m studying one of his other books “essentialism is a humanism”. I’m just a French student lol

    • @CCCCCCCCC11
      @CCCCCCCCC11 Рік тому +1

      @@CJ-pt8sg to get into philosophy I would start where it started. Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. The writings of Plato and Aristotle are free and online. Socrates didn’t really write but you’ll sure hear a lot about him if you read Plato or Aristotle.

  • @tobyzxcd
    @tobyzxcd 5 років тому +1

    I can really see where he's coming from, he can aswell, and where he's going to at the same time. Joking aside what a brilliant brilliant man and brilliant presentation! thoroughly informative and eye opening to the nature of existentialism

  • @shailendrasingh-lj9ri
    @shailendrasingh-lj9ri 7 років тому +27

    never connected so well to a philosopher. going to read all his writings. thank SOL

    • @user-hc4ls5of3g
      @user-hc4ls5of3g 11 місяців тому

      Did you get to his pedo self justifications

  • @bananatube6004
    @bananatube6004 8 років тому +1496

    This dude was mad smart n shit

    • @firewizzard86
      @firewizzard86 8 років тому +43

      He was actually an ugly, wonky eyed, idiot.

    • @opses546
      @opses546 8 років тому +38

      while i don't wholeheartedly agree i laughed pretty hard at your comment nonetheless

    • @firewizzard86
      @firewizzard86 8 років тому +35

      +Eric Bacon He was the inspiration for a whole new wave of French pseudo-intellectuals, calling themselves post modernists.

    • @firewizzard86
      @firewizzard86 8 років тому

      +Eric Bacon The whole Alan Sokal affair.

    • @lightgazaret6825
      @lightgazaret6825 7 років тому +5

      The whole Sokal affair has to do with only a journal, not all post modernist philosophers.

  • @grenadier2006
    @grenadier2006 3 роки тому +239

    Interesting that his life-long partner Simone de Beauvoir wasn't mentioned once.

    • @victordiazhierro1232
      @victordiazhierro1232 3 роки тому +80

      Or the fact that there isn’t a single female philosopher in the whole playlist

    • @TheEternalOuroboros
      @TheEternalOuroboros 3 роки тому +6

      @@victordiazhierro1232 Women are writers or poets, not philosophers. So it's hardly surprising.

    • @waynej2608
      @waynej2608 3 роки тому +33

      @@TheEternalOuroboros What about Virgina Wolf or Joyce Carrol Oats? They're writers, but one could argue they're philosophers, as well.

    • @waynej2608
      @waynej2608 3 роки тому

      I don't think I've seen a picture of Simone. Was she attractive? Not that it matters, it's just that Sartre wasn't exactly Cary Grant...

    • @TheEternalOuroboros
      @TheEternalOuroboros 3 роки тому +6

      @@waynej2608 I agree. The difference is that historically a woman couldn't be much else but a "writer" if they were bright.

  • @phouleSk8s
    @phouleSk8s 2 роки тому

    As a sarterian I have to say this is one of the best quick notes on the works of sarte that I've ever seen. Although I wish you would've added his quote on freedom during nazi occupation, and maybe utilized the story of his understudys conflict with wanting to join the free french army in England. He's one of the last true continentals.

  • @Kingro619
    @Kingro619 6 років тому +45

    "This chair is crazy.." This is how my mind thinks most of the time

  • @alkimbozkurt508
    @alkimbozkurt508 9 років тому +49

    Thanks alot Alain. These short videos are very accurate and extremely helpful in understanding the ideas and philosophy of great philosophers. While the ideas may appear to be complicated with the prose and language of the philosophers, this format really simplifies them and makes it comprehensible with great examples.

  • @buhkangliwayway
    @buhkangliwayway 5 років тому +1

    I loved his view on things tbh completely honest. There is appreciation in the absurdity and he allows for one to look at things in a micro and macro view which is essential to be have a heightened awareness we so lack in this age.

  • @sacredscribe42
    @sacredscribe42 3 роки тому

    this is exactly how i viewed the world after experiencing ego death. sarte was able to see reality as it truly is, without thought, judgement, or beliefs about how you think things are or should be. This philosophy to me closely resembles what its like to see the world once youve experienced enlightenment, only thing is enlightenment is sure to be blissful and youd see things as miraculous. ego death means to have the same experience of the world as you would if you were enlightened but you would probably see it as strange or dreadful because of sin/karma you still carry

  • @CptDangernoodle
    @CptDangernoodle 9 років тому +180

    Can you start making videos on key philosphical movements once youre done with specific authors?
    Like Existencialism, Stoicism, Nihilism etc.

    • @CptDangernoodle
      @CptDangernoodle 9 років тому +1

      Great!

    • @gvstudios6038
      @gvstudios6038 9 років тому +7

      ***** How about one on Objectivism? I would be most amused, as I'm sure many others would be.

    • @gplor55
      @gplor55 5 років тому +2

      relativism and vitalism as well!!

    • @knightsofempathy6768
      @knightsofempathy6768 4 роки тому

      There is NOBODY

  • @AnnaKraft97
    @AnnaKraft97 9 років тому +46

    These videos are so informative and wholesome. I feel so satisfied after watching them.

  • @SuperEekie64
    @SuperEekie64 5 років тому +17

    Sartre's philosophy has helped me so much. Love the video

    • @therealjasonc1243
      @therealjasonc1243 4 роки тому +2

      SuperEekie64 How has it helped you ? If you don’t mind me asking

  • @krishnantampi3996
    @krishnantampi3996 5 років тому +1

    Sarte created new trend in literature,and was admired by many abstract thinkers

  • @theshaolin2391
    @theshaolin2391 9 років тому +236

    Outstanding.

    • @theshaolin2391
      @theshaolin2391 9 років тому +6

      ***** Praise well deserved. Would you guys ever consider doing Being and Nothingness vs. Being and Time?

    • @theshaolin2391
      @theshaolin2391 9 років тому

      ***** Haha yes I've always wondered what a demonstration comparing and contrasting these two works would look like.

    • @sukhsonu99
      @sukhsonu99 9 років тому

      +The Scho jbj9c
      ; ,* :
      😣😣😤--&j&ol of Life

    • @ignazszlacheta5392
      @ignazszlacheta5392 8 років тому

      Ryan Hayes Extremly interesting that kind of view on the world

    • @superiorseven4814
      @superiorseven4814 8 років тому +2

      +Ryan Hayes exceptionnel

  • @donrob7779
    @donrob7779 7 років тому +11

    I have a ten page paper due about him next month, thank you so much for letting this exist

  • @tsunchoo
    @tsunchoo 4 роки тому +10

    I bloody love these, thanks Alain and whoever else is behind these, the animations and art picks are wonderful too and I laughed my ass off when he broke down the evening meal with partner 😂

  • @Diana-wp4bp
    @Diana-wp4bp 2 роки тому +2

    I read his book " Existentialism&human" it's amazing💜

  • @Leviathon672015
    @Leviathon672015 9 років тому +32

    I have literally felt this way my entire life. The existentialists get me. They just do.

  • @ashleyhynes2124
    @ashleyhynes2124 7 років тому +6

    What a wonderful channel this is. Thank you for producing such amazing content, fascinating.

  • @kanzaashar2935
    @kanzaashar2935 5 років тому

    I’m telling you this is the best ever video I’ve ever came across during exams 👍🏻👍🏻

  • @rusy3112
    @rusy3112 3 роки тому +11

    Watching this while on the cusp of starting my first job is a great reminder that life is and will be more than my occupation. thank you :)

  • @MaoRuiqi
    @MaoRuiqi 8 років тому +40

    One quibble, your videos deserve higher numbers! I'm sure over time, as they form the basis of a vast video philosophical library, they will achieve the viewings they deserve. Well done!

    • @meghanamanjunath4387
      @meghanamanjunath4387 8 років тому

      +Ruiqi Mao I agree! I'd say this is the best channel of its kind on UA-cam!

    • @bobrolander4344
      @bobrolander4344 8 років тому

      +Ruiqi Mao I'm sure too that this series will become legend! Always a good starting point to get some perspective and some fresh ideas.

  • @hazedown5108
    @hazedown5108 8 років тому +61

    I'm French and a philosophy student. Actually, with Sartre and within his theater pieces (as much relevant as his philosophic books/essays) what is important to catch is that we are nothingness, ourselves, basically. We do not have a nature/essence (nor identity logically (the critic) ) and so we are undeterminated : we are and have everything to become, and it's by our choices(which must lead to freedom) that we become free. "The existence before Nature/Essence (the Idea), " but where Sartre goes too much beyond the existence and others (autrui) in his philosophy is when he says that I can do everything as long as I'm responsible of my acts : the absolute freedom (which can mislead and fuck mankind up) there is not limit, to sum up, in his way of seeing freedom. Men has everything to become, he is nothingness because if he is smthg, others will determine him according to their way of seeing him, they would determine him at the moment to keep in mind this particular image. He disagrees, our reflected acts on this specific moment cannot absolutely show what we are really, because we build ourselves with the time. Sartre's philosophy is a philosophy of responsibility. THIS is just a sum up, but what you have to keep in mind essentially concerning the author. I suggest you to read his theater (Being and nothingness is quite exhausting ^^) Sorry for a few mistakes in the idiom that you have probably noticed.. bonne continuation et vive la philo ;)

    • @tryrshaughroad551
      @tryrshaughroad551 8 років тому +2

      +Haze Down Salut, je suis étudiant aussi et j'aimerais savoir quels livres de Sartre tu recommandes de lire. Merci d'avance

    • @preciousthing101
      @preciousthing101 5 років тому

      Damn, you just confused me all over again. But vive la philosophia!

    • @miaah8562
      @miaah8562 5 років тому

      Haze Down w

    • @sunnymarchflymcgee
      @sunnymarchflymcgee 5 років тому

      My dad told me this guy was a total wanker and after reading this I'm inclined to agree

    • @mohicanmowl
      @mohicanmowl 5 років тому +1

      @Bruno56 you are a commie.as well, you Just don't realize It yet

  • @DeMause
    @DeMause 5 років тому +2

    Of the philosophers you have covered Satre is the one I most agree with.

  • @0xssff
    @0xssff 5 років тому +2

    Please never stop making these

  • @Irrtumvorbehalten
    @Irrtumvorbehalten 8 років тому +7

    I was searching for a video on Simone de Beauvoir - seems like an omission since both Sartre and Camus are here! I would greatly appreciate an Alain-de-Botton sketch of her philosophy.

  • @Chronix74
    @Chronix74 9 років тому +16

    yet another great video.. you guys are quickly becoming one of my favorite channels.

    • @TheAlbHunter
      @TheAlbHunter 9 років тому +1

      Alain de Botton Holy, I didn't know this was Mr. de Botton's channel. Well, that explains the high quality material. Thanks to you sir and to the whole team, keep up the good work.

  • @Lambdaphile
    @Lambdaphile 3 роки тому +2

    I remember myself as a little child having similar questions. Like back when I was 4-5 years old... I stopped questioning these things as I grew up, I wonder what happened to me...

  • @nela0113
    @nela0113 5 років тому

    Such level of awareness, brilliant!

  • @ryanhedblom2380
    @ryanhedblom2380 9 років тому +6

    Over the past week I've binge-watched all the videos on the channel. The ideas I've been exposed to have been incredibly enlightening, so thank you for that! Also, I know you get many, many, suggestions on philosophers to cover, but you should really consider Camus. Since "The Stranger" and "The Myth of Sisyphus" play so nicely off of Sartre, they seem worthy of exploration!

    • @CarlosJMunoz
      @CarlosJMunoz 9 років тому

      ***** Schopenhauer and Cioran? C:

  • @s70rk
    @s70rk 8 років тому +11

    I love this video so, so much.

  • @elnicho1
    @elnicho1 4 роки тому

    Satre's philosophy was a turning point in my youth. To look at the world thru a different perspective outside the grand institutional thought

  • @evilpandakillabzonattkoccu4879
    @evilpandakillabzonattkoccu4879 2 роки тому

    There is this church I go to frequently because they have a free book exchange box out front. I feel compelled every now and then to check out what they have. Sartre's "The Physiology of Imagination". Amazing find!
    it's crazy to read ideas that seem as equally crazy as it is intuitively true.....to me, I mean. I think like this all the time.....or, as doctors say: I have ASPD.
    I once had the realization that I couldn't prove that anything but my experience....not even myself....was real. I realized I couldn't prove that everything was anything other than just an image in my mind. A mental symbol of an object, person, experience.
    ....then I thought about how a traumatic experience in a dream, if real, could likely effect the mind in the same way as if it had actually happened.
    One day, I put my wife and kids to bed, close up the house and go to sleep. The dream I had was a very vivid dream based half on a fear of mine and half on a near death experience I had but don't remember. IRL, when I was a teen, I drank almost an entire bottle of 190 proof everclear and almost died. I don't remember much but what I do remember of it.....was very similar to my dream.
    The dream: I was in my teenage room at my parent's old house. My life (wife and kids) feel like a very vivid dream that is fleeting (I feel that in the dream). I have asthma and in the dream, I'm slowly dying from an asthma attack (seeing my room from the same POV as when I drank too much). It hurt, it took forever and I felt myself fade into nothingness. The entire experience in real time, seemingly....and the whole time, the memory of my family is being disregarded as an unimportant dream. I didn't want to be mourning over a dream family as I die IRL.
    .....then, nothingness.
    Back to reality: I must have slept well because I didn't wake up in a start or even until late the next day. When I woke up, I was honestly shocked that I was, somehow, not dead. 'Also, why was I in my dream and why does this dream feel so real?' I thought. After that.....it was nearly a year before I was able to fully grasp that me dying was a dream and my life was reality.
    it's embarrassing to admit and it was a sign of a severe mental health crisis. I got treatment and.... funny part....the doctors and psychologists I saw agreed with me that nobody could prove that my solipsistic view was incorrect and didn't have an answer on hand. one said she hadn't thought of my ideas before and asked for time to think them through.
    ...absolutely genius move on their part! they got my ego to feel smart (im not smart) and that was enough to initiate rational debate about the issue. it's like being conned into chess by a grandmaster. once a logical conversation had begun, they were able to logically walk me back from my messed up ideas.

  • @mercyritz1311
    @mercyritz1311 8 років тому +224

    How do I get started with Philosophy? What books to read, what chronological order to follow and what method to use/un-use while reading?

    • @mercyritz1311
      @mercyritz1311 8 років тому +7

      +The School of Life Read an extract. Will order and get started! thank you!

    • @atwaterpub
      @atwaterpub 8 років тому +34

      +Mercyritz13 It would be best to start with a good understanding of history and historical events both classical and modern. The historical timeline will give you a context for the philosophical ideas discussed. One great place to start is Will Durant "Story of Civilization." It is a little dated, but still a great academic foundation. Will Durant also wrote "The Story of Philosophy" and THAT might be good for you to read also. It was a best seller in its day.

    • @daysipaolacruzcastillo7800
      @daysipaolacruzcastillo7800 8 років тому +48

      I am not a philosophy student or anything, but I got much interested in it through reading literature, Dostoyevsky's Crime and punishment. Then, I started with postmodernist philosophers, like Foucault and Sartre. And modern ones like Nietzsche, Freud and Marx. You will find many references to classical philosophers and 17th century thinkers in their writings. So you are not only reading the ones I am telling, you but you are approaching others that are very important like Kant, Kiekkegaard, Leipzig... so you will get to choose who you would like to read in depth. I got to tell you that have come to a good understanding of philosophical matters in the way I think and speak.

    • @hazedown5108
      @hazedown5108 8 років тому +33

      +Daysi Cruz Starting philosophy with Nietzsche, Kierkegaard and Liebniz ? What a joke : you need so many decades so as to understand them, especially Nietzsche (his writting is so rich and demands a HUGE culture from the reader...) Well, do not listen to her, she doesn't know what she's saying... Start with the fundamental : Plato, Socrate, Aristote

    • @atwaterpub
      @atwaterpub 8 років тому +92

      Daysi Cruz Don't listen to detractors and doubters. Start with whatever author you like and just start reading. Over time, you will learn to put it all together. Starting with "The Ancients" is a good idea , but not vital. Just getting started is the important step.

  • @Nerfherder3
    @Nerfherder3 4 роки тому +36

    "All men are born with a God shaped hole in their heart"

    • @ozzylepunknown551
      @ozzylepunknown551 3 роки тому +11

      God is just an illusion created by humans in the need of an purpose.

    • @javierherrera8782
      @javierherrera8782 3 роки тому +4

      @@ozzylepunknown551 say that to Einstein who said his religion consist of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit ;)

    • @javierherrera8782
      @javierherrera8782 3 роки тому

      @Abhiroop das good for you :)

    • @javierherrera8782
      @javierherrera8782 3 роки тому

      @Abhiroop das believe what you want :) it's your right to do so.

    • @javierherrera8782
      @javierherrera8782 3 роки тому +2

      @Abhiroop das yes, you are right in your own mind.
      Everyone is wise in their own opinion

  • @PrimitiveBaroque
    @PrimitiveBaroque 2 роки тому +2

    Sartre was one of the earliest thinkers I studied, next to Russell. Good times. His book Being and Nothingness can get really deep and is not as "on-the-surface" as it seems. It ends with speculation at how his Existentialism could have ethics, but it just doesn't go too far. Simone de Beauvoir actually comes closer to a possible existentialist ethics in her writings.

  • @jamesharris184
    @jamesharris184 4 місяці тому

    So beautifully written, and narrated.

  • @moreapropos
    @moreapropos 8 років тому +68

    I thought his big idea was: "Existence precedes essence."

    • @raphaelbonnot319
      @raphaelbonnot319 4 роки тому

      Descartes big idea.

    • @samrevlej9331
      @samrevlej9331 4 роки тому +9

      @@raphaelbonnot319 Nope, Sartre. It means that nothing in existence has a predefined essence or inner nature before coming into being. Humans can make their own future by continuously choosing what to do while having in mind that they are free, as they have no essence that dictates they should or will act in any way, but also responsible, as any action or non-action they take sets a standard for what the morality of humankind should be (not to be likened to Kant, though).

    • @lollol-ou8tp
      @lollol-ou8tp 4 роки тому

      Rick Riordan first dude’s right tho. Nigga it’s Descartes

    • @mariapaulamacedo4858
      @mariapaulamacedo4858 4 роки тому +2

      ​@@lollol-ou8tp Its actually Sartre's. Thats existencialism, that nothing has a predetermined purpose or destiny, but its purpose or destiny will come with its existence first. Thats what sets us free, acording to his philosophy. Decartes is more I THINK THEREFORE I EXISTS, which comes as a conclusion of a diferent process of tought and questions.

  • @bradendredge8792
    @bradendredge8792 9 років тому +25

    "You’re a ghost driving a meat coated skeleton made from stardust. What do you have to be afraid of?"
    I sense Sartrean perspective in this quote. :)

  • @elnicho1
    @elnicho1 4 роки тому +1

    Of all the philosophy books I read. Human All To Human, changed the way I viewed life as a whole.

  • @SL2797
    @SL2797 9 місяців тому

    Very informative video about Satre. Thank you!

  • @Cvcvcvcvcv317
    @Cvcvcvcvcv317 7 років тому +753

    Can you make one on Simone de Beauvoir? ^_^

    • @sophiakavaldjieva783
      @sophiakavaldjieva783 6 років тому +5

      CharliGirlToast yes, please!!!

    • @diezpiedrasnegras1703
      @diezpiedrasnegras1703 6 років тому +3

      I know right! Why don't they?!

    • @anweshakar146
      @anweshakar146 6 років тому +46

      Because women.

    • @lastmaj
      @lastmaj 6 років тому +3

      still no response ?

    • @PaszerDye
      @PaszerDye 6 років тому +12

      She is madly in love with Sartre, but tragically he is incapable to returning any sort of love. Her beautiful song will go unheard by the one she sings for.

  • @cinnamondan4984
    @cinnamondan4984 8 років тому +6

    The School of Life is amazing!

  • @emmanuelagudo4918
    @emmanuelagudo4918 2 роки тому

    I don't know if Sartre's abstraction that is so brilliant and liberating, or that eloquence in diction coming from the narration of '2. We are free' (@2:46).

  • @Gagandeep-qd7zb
    @Gagandeep-qd7zb Рік тому +1

    This chat should have a group,where we can refer our dilemmas and seek second opinions

  • @UsotheMarshmallow
    @UsotheMarshmallow 4 роки тому +20

    I have very similar beliefs to Satre in a lot of ways, thanks for making this great video summarizing everything! These philosopher videos are great!

  • @sutirtharoy
    @sutirtharoy 6 років тому +11

    “The fact that life has no meaning is a reason to live ― moreover, the only one.”
    Emil M Cioran

  • @ar9n
    @ar9n 5 років тому

    I'm grateful for how unbiased this channel is

  • @LePhilosef
    @LePhilosef 6 років тому

    *J'aime beaucoup ce format vidéo, avec des illustrations en mouvement, une voix-off agréable... bon travail, et source d'inspiration pour ma chaîne PHILO*

  • @cookwithkat
    @cookwithkat 7 років тому +6

    He is my favorite philosopher. I love his work so much.

    • @oracle_0166
      @oracle_0166 4 роки тому +1

      My favorite is Montaigne :)

  • @patrickkilduff5272
    @patrickkilduff5272 4 роки тому +3

    I curse you Sartre! You have inspired me to constantly reevaluate the utter strangeness of the world. I am a cook at a restaurant and find myself asking my coworkers if they find it as weird as me to be dipping hacked up pieces of an animal keep in a cage built just for it in the fat derived from a completely different animal kept in its own cage until it reaches a certain temperature and then brought on a tray (could go on about how strange a tray is as well) to other humans who will pay me to do this...the Sartrean rabbit hole runs deep in restaurants...

  • @uttaradit2
    @uttaradit2 4 роки тому

    excellent subject and discourse.

  • @user-re7sh7nw8z
    @user-re7sh7nw8z 11 місяців тому +1

    Great Philosopher!

  • @rolando580
    @rolando580 9 років тому +6

    Excellent channel. It would be really nice if you guys did a video about Proust.

    • @rolando580
      @rolando580 9 років тому

      Great. I look forward to it.

  • @thomasanderson1786
    @thomasanderson1786 3 роки тому +11

    I love this channel. Philosophy is one of the topics that should be mandatory.

  • @VenusLover17
    @VenusLover17 3 роки тому

    Thanks so much

  • @SwagxIkarma
    @SwagxIkarma 4 роки тому +5

    At 2:30 when you broke down a 'normal' situation into something that sounds strange and insane, I do this every day and I thought there was something wrong with me? I've only just learnt about sartre.

    • @zolda7179
      @zolda7179 3 роки тому

      you were just an existentialist without realizing it ;)

  • @saeedbaig4249
    @saeedbaig4249 7 років тому +5

    3:49- If I may provide my 2 cents; eagerness in performing one's work does not necessarily mean one is acting in bad faith. The waiter (had they really been based on a real person) could be fully aware that there are other career opportunities and lifestyles available to them. Since few plan to be a waiter forever, It's more likely that he simply saw his waiter role as a temporary occupation or a stepping stone on the road to bigger things.

  • @mentorlesscom
    @mentorlesscom 9 років тому +8

    a clear and good summary. Interesting to see though that Simone de Beauvoir was never mentioned once when we know how much she participated in Sartre's intellectual development and how collaborative their philosophical and political efforts were. Out of curiosity: would you spontaneously make a video about de Beauvoir without mentioning Sartre? If you say yes, then forget I said anything.

    • @toshi292929
      @toshi292929 9 років тому +1

      well at least she was in the pictures..lol, but was thinking the same thing, her collection of letters is my current loo literature. gives you a rather intimate understanding of their relationship, tres moderne.

    • @jimmarch9298
      @jimmarch9298 9 років тому +1

      mentorless.com Good point. I missed it. Thanks for the reminder.

    • @paulhalf
      @paulhalf 9 років тому +1

      Mobutu Sese Seko Nkuku Ngbendu
      tres moderne, but dysfunctional. Sartre was a controlling and self-indulgent partner. I dunno - does the personal conduct of a philosopher undermine the value oftheir abstract work? I tend to feel - in the case of "philosophers of conduct" like Sartre that yes, it does.

  • @alonespirit_1Q84
    @alonespirit_1Q84 3 роки тому

    Truly Inspiring!

  • @informalliteraryexperiments
    @informalliteraryexperiments 9 місяців тому +1

    I like early Sartre for his popularising and development of ideas on contingency and individualism, in the context of freedom.