How Matter Creates Light: The Science Behind Electromagnetic Radiation

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 33

  • @PhilDockery
    @PhilDockery Рік тому +5

    This was profoundly incredible for me: I have never understood this until now, thanks to the way you explained how the electromagnetic spectrum works. Thank you! New subscriber!

  • @Philomats
    @Philomats 28 днів тому

    You explained electromagnetic radiation like a true teacher. You clearly understand this subject because you have made this easy to comprehend and visualize.

  • @fatimaajm7804
    @fatimaajm7804 3 місяці тому

    اكتشفت انني لا اعرف الاساسيات البسيطة عن الضوء شكرا لشرحك الجميل ❤

  • @miguelhoyos2272
    @miguelhoyos2272 3 місяці тому

    Excellent explanation of what light really is! It opened my mind, but I still have a lot of work to process all the implications of it. Thank you very much, I will check out your other videos and keep connected for your new content.

  • @markwhitt8488
    @markwhitt8488 8 місяців тому

    This was something that I've been curious about for a long time. I've seen clues in a lot of other places, but it didn't really click for me until now. What surprised me the most is that for some reason I had been under the impression that only electrons absorb and emit photons. Realizing that protons do as well is a significant mental shift for me.
    I already knew that electrons absorbing and emitting a photon will change the electron's energy state. Finding that protons also have similar energy states helps to understand the different types of radiation, as well as helping to make better sense for how neutrons play a different role in all of this. Now I'm curious about how the enormous mass difference between an electron and proton affect the whole process of photon generation - and suddenly, nuclear physics is very interesting!
    I didn't realize that actually knowing what a photon is would be so revealing.
    So a really big THANK YOU! Just now finding your channel via this video and it looks like a wonderful treasure trove. Can't wait to dig into more.

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 8 місяців тому

      Electrons aren't absorbing photons. That is ruled out by conservation laws. Electrons on their own can scatter photons, i.e. there has to be an outgoing photon if there was an incoming one. Only compound systems like atoms and protons can fully absorb photons, even though at the end of the day those are also just scattering processes.

  • @IzySly-g4h
    @IzySly-g4h 4 місяці тому

    I am working on a pair of glasses that let you see the double slit experiment and interact with it, can you help me explain to someone what it is that they are actually seeing with the observer effect? Thank you in advance for responding.

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 3 місяці тому +1

      There is no such thing as an "observer effect". It's one of those made up things that just don't want to go away, kind of like religion.

  • @rebanelson607
    @rebanelson607 Рік тому

    I don't think I can live long enough to really understand this stuff but thanks for this excellent presentation!

  • @danasotornik
    @danasotornik 4 місяці тому

    Thank you for explaining what photons are. I finally understand it.

  • @ONEYEDPiRAT
    @ONEYEDPiRAT Рік тому +1

    Holy cow it's a real person thanks dude!

  • @Fat_Tony_Capaldi
    @Fat_Tony_Capaldi Рік тому

    Excellent content my friend. Keep up the good work!

  • @86congtymienbac80
    @86congtymienbac80 Рік тому

    The electromagnetic field radiates into space in a spherical shape. Considering a photon when emitted, why is its energy completely absorbed at one point on that sphere? Do other points on the sphere not receive any waves?

    • @JasonKendallAstronomer
      @JasonKendallAstronomer  Рік тому

      Well, it is a quantum of energy. Also, that seems to be a fairly advanced question that'd go deep into Quantum Field Theory. Suffice it to say that we can have electron/photon collisions that transfer momentum, such as Compton Scattering and the Photoelectric Effect. These both provide evidence of the photon acting like a particle. So there would be a wibbly-wobbly-wavey-pointy "contact place" where their wavefunctions would overlap, and scatter off each other. It's all very peculiar at that exact impact point, which really can't be a "point". I recommend hunting down Feynmann's Lectures on the topic.

    • @86congtymienbac80
      @86congtymienbac80 Рік тому

      @@JasonKendallAstronomer Some experimentalists say that the electromagnetic field is the average sum of many photons. This seems to imply that photons act as substantial, directional beings (like "rays of light") and that electromagnetic fields are illusory.
      So does it make sense to model a photon as a packet of many electromagnetic waves with an average frequency?
      Here is his explanation:
      "The classical electromagnetic field is the average of many quanta. It simply doesn't exist for "one photon". How would you measure it, exactly? Do you remember how these quantities were defined in high school? As the forces on charges and currents. No such measurement is possible except in the classical limit."

    • @86congtymienbac80
      @86congtymienbac80 Рік тому

      @@JasonKendallAstronomer If you want to explain light as a kind of classical electromagnetism, I think, describe the growth of waves in space like a balloon. A component such as surface tension is needed so that when energy is absorbed, that electromagnetic wave energy must be concentrated to one point.

  • @stridedeck
    @stridedeck Рік тому

    You never explained the mechanical cause of a "charge", only its observation of pushing away and pulling towards. Also, the "field" is not described as to its original formation. Each quantum has its own field and there are 17 fields throughout the universe, but what is the substance of a field and the fabric of space?

    • @JasonKendallAstronomer
      @JasonKendallAstronomer  Рік тому +2

      I think, for this particular video, that I was aiming not at describing the entire Standard Model, but rather just getting an intuitive feel for how these photon things work. Perhaps someday, I'll hit the SM, but that's not really in the scope of a lecture series that's principally aimed at an introductory astronomy class level.
      However, thanks for the very good idea about doing just that! It'd be an exciting journey.

    • @kellyrobinson1780
      @kellyrobinson1780 Рік тому +3

      I can help with one of your questions. "Charges" just ARE. They're a fundamental property of protons and electrons. They simply exist. They can't be broken down, or explained, or simplified. They are just a basic property of their respective particles. Just as water is wet. It just IS, and charges just ARE. I hope that's helpful.

  • @IzySly-g4h
    @IzySly-g4h 4 місяці тому

    I can tell by the comments that I need some popcorn and a beer because I am going to love this! Thank you for uploading this video.

  • @Just.A.T-Rex
    @Just.A.T-Rex Рік тому

    Early Christmas!! Woot woot

  • @marklong7698
    @marklong7698 Рік тому

    So good!

  • @kenh9508
    @kenh9508 Рік тому

    Thank you!

  • @joeharmon3301
    @joeharmon3301 Рік тому

    If “old” light can turn into matter… could that be what dark matter and/or dark energy is??

  • @alitlweird
    @alitlweird Рік тому

    Photon Torpedoes.

  • @phukfone8428
    @phukfone8428 Рік тому

    Luminiferous aether

    • @kellyrobinson1780
      @kellyrobinson1780 Рік тому +1

      So you're a time-traveler from the late 19th century?😁🤙