@itzflyboyofficial5533 fewer means a smaller number. 0 is supposed to represent the absence of negative and positive numbers. It represents nothing, not fewer things.
@@johnathanhunter1351 no fewer simply means lower than what you already have. Lets change the example so you understand better. Lets use hours of work. If Mike prefers fewer hours of work and he currently has to work 2 hours , this doesn’t mean once he gets to 1hour he will be okay. The concept of needing fewer implies that you prefer as few as possible so Mike prefers having fewer books(fewer than whatever he is currently having) . This can only stop at 0 when there is nothing left to give up. Sorry for the long text
@itzflyboyofficial5533 Fewer implies she still wants at least 1. Otherwise, she would say she didn't want any. Fewer is less of, not none. I'm being finicky, but words to me are Important. I guess she needs to be more specific!
@@johnathanhunter1351 to me saying fewer makes perfect sense. zero is fewer than 1 and so she prefers zero over one. to say she doesn't want any means that having zero is of highest benefit to her, but doesn't necessarily mean that having one is better than having two. I know it's an old thread but I comment anyways haha
thank you so much, finally I found someone made me understand
you explained it very clearly
Thanks a lot!
Super bro it's much more clear
Brilliant explanation!
Thank you!
Impressive
Keep going in english it helps a lot
THANK YOU SO MUCH! ToT
Thank you
You're welcome!
so helpful !
Glad it helped!
best
Thank you!
thx!!
Basically someone is getting ducked over
0 2 2 2 4 is not Pareto Efficient. Miko is worse off because she wanted 'fewer' (a small number of) bars not no bars. 1 2 2 2 3 would be efficient.
0 is still fewer than one
@itzflyboyofficial5533 fewer means a smaller number. 0 is supposed to represent the absence of negative and positive numbers. It represents nothing, not fewer things.
@@johnathanhunter1351 no fewer simply means lower than what you already have.
Lets change the example so you understand better. Lets use hours of work. If Mike prefers fewer hours of work and he currently has to work 2 hours , this doesn’t mean once he gets to 1hour he will be okay. The concept of needing fewer implies that you prefer as few as possible so Mike prefers having fewer books(fewer than whatever he is currently having) . This can only stop at 0 when there is nothing left to give up.
Sorry for the long text
@itzflyboyofficial5533
Fewer implies she still wants at least 1. Otherwise, she would say she didn't want any.
Fewer is less of, not none.
I'm being finicky, but words to me are Important.
I guess she needs to be more specific!
@@johnathanhunter1351 to me saying fewer makes perfect sense. zero is fewer than 1 and so she prefers zero over one. to say she doesn't want any means that having zero is of highest benefit to her, but doesn't necessarily mean that having one is better than having two. I know it's an old thread but I comment anyways haha