RIPLEY Netflix Ending Explained
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 кві 2024
- RIPLEY Netflix Ending Explained
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use. - Розваги
The cat was the best supporting actor
Ron Perlman ass cat
This is the best cinematic experience I’ve had on Netflix since Mike Flanagan’s Haunting of Hill House.. Beautifully shot, incredible acting, and a remarkable adaptation all the way through.
The cinematography and production were insane. These creative values alone provide visual treats, allowing you to appreciate the story as it slowly unfolds. The art direction authentically transports you back to the 60s. This artistic treatment did justice to the book, with 8 episodes covering more details than the movie. Looking back, 'Talented Mr. Ripley' was way too sunny and rushed.
'Talented Mr. Ripley' was way too sunny and rushed. God, the B&W was the best decision ever.
As an Italian I enjoyed seeing Ripley being shot in some of Italy's most beautiful places and
hearing the actors speaking Italian (good job by the way!).
I loved the dark tones, the black and white, the cinematography.
9/10 for me.
Andrew Scott is a master of the craft.
Everything he does is superior.
Last autumn I flew to London just for one night, to see him perform in Cechov's Vanya.
He played all the characters himself.
What a ride!!!
Perfection.
Are Italian police this terrible in real life? That detective is the worst I’ve ever seen
@@KingFury6293 bad apples are everywhere
Who was your favorite character... The Mafia guy?
Italy is a dark place, full of ghosts vampires and zombies
I loved this show. It was riveting. Great ending.
The cinematography was excellent. I had seen "The Talented Mr. Ripley" several times and enjoyed it but it wasn't a particularly beautiful film . This version is so well crafted. I love films that include the location as a character and this certainly does. Best use of B&W I have seen in a long time.
Genius 😊 and absolutely rewatch-worthy
I enjoyed a darker side to this version. The visuals and sound design were epic.
Just can't believed ... that ." Ravini .. who was ..the detective investigator ..did'nt even
ASKED .PHOTOS ? ? Until the firstm book of Marge ..whom she gifted to Ravini
and dedicated it to Richard " Dickie . Ha ha ha .l
Ripley 's TALENT . 100 % He's TOTALLY GOOD OF LYING !
SO .. YES HE WAS NUTS !!
I want to know how Tom managed to get the Picasso back I thought it was in a vault at the bank under Dickies name.
I don't understand one thing from the ending. Why doesn't he leave Venice? He has a new identity and I expected him to leave his last known adress but he hangs the Picasso in his house in Venice? Does this mean you should suggest that the police officer probably found him within a few days?
That's what I'm sayin - seems like he's f'd, once that picture is seen in the book...?!
🔥show
It needs explaining? Just watch it folks.
At the end they all become so naive and dumb,.great first chárpters but dull ending
CRISTINA YOU ARE SO BEAUTIFUL ADORABLE SEDUCTIVE RAVISHING SEXY CAPTIVATING AND PASSIONATE YOUR BEAUTY IS PHENOMENAL IF MOZART WERE ALIVE TODAY YOU WOULD BE HIS MUSE LET ME FALL IN LOVE WITH YOU MARCVOLPE ❤
agreed
The trans-Freddie thing ruins an otherwise totally immersive experience. They might as well put in a dog in to play the part instead of a nepo-baby girl playing a guy. Or JUST MAKE THE PART A WOMAN because it's not at all a gender important role. Also, PS Hoffman played the balls off that role in the first movie and THIS is what you give us for the detailed version?
Yep, the kid of Sting. What frustrated me the most is that otherwise she (they) seemed to be a very talented actor but my confusion about the gender thing ruined it all.
It actually worked well, there's some confusion at first, but after a while i completely saw her as a young man. Also, if the role wasn't gender important, why are you asking for more carity in the gender of the character? 😅
@@francescobisesto806 There's no way in hell that woman passes for a man in 1950s Italy. She doesn't pass now in deranged modern America. And if you liked her acting you either have brain damage or have zero standards.
Wow i had high hopes for this show but BORRING! I just couldn't the movie was so good but this new one just put me to sleep TWICE!!!
I found this show mediocre and bland at times. It lacked the glamour and glory that the 1999 Anthony Mingella "The Talented Mr Ripley" adaptation had.