The Fox 3's Experience

Thank you for watching!
If you would like to support my channel, please like and subscribe. Thank you!
#warthunder #warthundergameplay #warthundernews #warthundertanks #warthundermoments #gaming

[@corybrown2197]

Super interesting seeing the mica gameplay.
I’ve been grinding and using the aim-120 on the F-16, F-15, and harrier. And the missile performs more like a spear that throws itself straight, fast, and long.
The Mica seems to perform more like a boomerang. Short range, wobbly, but holy shit does it turn hard.

[@acdfg3]

why you fired a MICA-EM at 35/50km on the deck? AMRAAMs barely hit anything at 40km at 10,000m a MICA is not even going to reach the target at 35 or 50km considering it bleeds energy quickly and you aren't guiding the missile through TWS

[@glitchhacker300]

Why does TWS have anything to do with it?

[@acdfg3]

@@glitchhacker300 he didn't use TWS to guide the missile

[@giovannijr.tortia7594]

I consistenly hit with amraams from like 50km at 10000m, and even when i don't hit i still force the opponent to go defensive

[@zacharymarino8926]

First two missiles literally fired outside the max range, they would literally never hit even if the target didn't maneuver

[@T95man]

Russia has something similar. The r77

[@desmonetizacao777]

This is Brazil 🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷

[@TGthepro728]

I reckon on the deck micas max range would be about 25km 40 to 50 is way too far

[@SandersonRicl]

BRAZIL MENTIONED 🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷

[@Eve.0.]

Can someone buy me a pack 50% off?

[@arend463]

god straight up the worst thing theyve ever added to the game

[@notmyrealaccount5245]

The same stale gameplay with new killing weapons which basically could make us kill from kilometers away.... they really should get new game mission designer

[@arend463]

@@notmyrealaccount5245 changed from launching missiles from

[@notmyrealaccount5245]

@@arend463 don't get me wrong... new addition is good to the game as warthunder centered around realistic military vehicles simulation and more modern vehicles added is crucial for the game continuation. The objectives is lackluster I mean gaijin basically using the same objectives and the same gameplay for ARB since 1.0. As one of warthunder veteran it's damn stale and now they're adding ARH which makes the player have no chance to complete their objectives especially when bombing bases, killing ai etc.... adding more objectives than 4 bases could potentially solve that. I mean now it's 16v16 and more bases could be a good QoL update and also with multipathing lowered, the stock grind gonna be hell for stock top tier. Seriously, what the hell gaijin game mission designer is cooking. The arb gameplay should be different for low, middle and top tier

[@arend463]

@@notmyrealaccount5245 ahh yes realistic militaries send 16 aircraft to fight 16 enemy aircraft with so electronic warfare. They also send their tanks to dual other tanks from

[@arend463]

@@notmyrealaccount5245 but yeah i do agree that the game designer needs to be fired.

[@y9derniy86]

Skill issue