Exactly, these muppets just spout the same crap about going towards renewable because it's all part of the same Net Zero scam from the WEF and Globalist wealth transfer agenda.
people who say they care about climate change but are against nuclear clearly really only care about politics = it should be clear to everyone by now that no one thing will fix the climate = it will take a mix including nuclear ☢
It's infinite. Most "renewable" energy is net negative because more energy is expended on e.g. mining and transporting materials for solar panels and wind turbines, then smelting all the metals for the totally restructured cable network, and in the full fantasy constructing incalculable numbers of gigantic batteries. Metals can't be smelted by wind alone.
@@andrewgraham7659 ....and the benefits totally questionable. I honestly believe Nett Zero is simply a method of extracting money from taxpayers to keep elites in a luxury lifestyle.
Bottomless pit of despair might as well be burning our money. The solar panels and turbines are so fragile and completely UN-RECYCLABLE its just insane and the trash it creates is worse than daily human waste
Broken hill is an example of power companies not working for power consumers. The big battery they had there wasn’t configured to actually run on island mode even though that’s what it promised. Only after 10 days did AGL agree to enable island mode. Any power asset won’t deliver if the companies running them aren’t acting collaboratively
Wish they would not call them renewables ,there not as the materials to make them have to be mined and manufactured and maintained after construction. Then no one talks about recycling them after especially the toxic chemicals in solar panels.
China are building 2 new coal fired power stations a week .... every week and have been doing so for some time. They also burn our coal while we suffer unaffordable power bills.
There is absolutely no utility in this course of action as the carbon dioxide emissions are actually beneficial. Benefits include increased agricultural yields, reduced winter heating requirements, fewer deaths from hypothermia and postponement of the next glacial maximum.
Laura is not a very good interviewer. At times she appears to be looking for opportunities to point score but does not have the knowledge to competently do so. Sometimes she seems distracted and at times disrespectful.
Sadly, she is trying to be more interactive rather than doing the important role of being a a unbiased interviewer of which she was doing very well.......the arrogance is really starting to show........do your job Laura......leave the comments to your guests.....
She seems to be pushing the WOKE climate SCAM narrative, just like the DEI scam. Truth will win !! and I hope we withdraw from the Paris Accord CON JOB.
Disagree. ABC is left, Sky is right and everyday it gets harder to work out the truth of what is really going on. Yes, her approach may come across as disrespectful/knowledge lacking at times but given the scope of what she covers, she cannot be an expert on every topic. At least there is a sense that she is trying not to give a "free ride" to either side of the debate. If you can do a better job of it, I will enjoy watching your interviews.
I like her. She seems to sensibly assume that if she’s talking to an LNP politician, that they’re full of shit and responds in an appropriate bored and indifferent manner. She might as well be interviewing a brick.
We are now a world leader in environmental destruction which is radically reducing the CO2 offset by removal of natural forests and protected areas, wildlife & plant species. CO2 is not a problem and the planet is fine, but we aren’t.
Net zero is crazy. The idea of dangerous global warming from CO2 is false. Sure CO2 is a greenhouse gas, but its effect diminishes logarithmically so most warming from CO2 has already occurred. And Le Chataliers principle that a system reacts to counter any change to an equilibrium means the modelling is wrong, as they adopt positive reinforcement assumptions. It is absolutely clear they are overstating warming. Besides, slightly warmer temperatures with higher CO2 is great for greening the Earth and thus is already clearly evident. If fears of CO2 disaster are right the expensive transition to nuclear is the only way forward. The idea of near complete renewables will be an economic and societal disaster at massive cost.
@CraigHarvey What is it that they predicted and that has happened? The generally accepted average temperature is said to have risen slightly since 1970, but at a significantly lower rate than most models. And what are the effects? The world is greener, crop yields are higher, food is plentiful, people have never been so well off, deaths from natural disasters including weather are way down. I don't know what study you are referring to but if they predicted anything correctly it certainly wasn't a climate disaster.
@russellholmes8742 "Specifically, Exxon projected that fossil fuel emissions would lead to 0.20 degrees Celsius of global warming per decade, with a margin of error of 0.04 degrees - a trend that has been proven largely accurate." That's why we're up to 1.5 degrees of warning in the atmosphere.
better still , thorium has already been mined and is sitting in tailings dams on mine sites all over the country waiting for recovery and use in reactors ! imagine reactors that run on dirt! [ mining waste], there is enough thorium in Mt Isa mines tailings dam alone to power australia for the next ten thousand years but wait, there's more! there is thorium on mars, on the moon, in asteroids , probably the whole universe is rich with it as its half-life is so long, fuel no matter where we go!
China is using 56% coal for running there economy. Why isn't Australian government, not using our own coal to keep prices down for all Australians ??? Labor and Greens Out
They are building 2 new coal fired power stations a week and have been for some times now. They also buy and burn our coal while we suffer from unaffordable renewable energy bills.
There was nothing new in Chris Ulman's documentary, if you have been following the renewables debate. The destruction of our beautiful environment is the true cost. Bowen's Folly.
Laura - much as I like you - shut up and let him finish his answer... bit too keen on this one young lady, the answer is forthcoming but for your interruptions...
Laura is a bit of a leftie in my opinion. Always looking for the negatives in her questioning. How about asking some intelligent questions about Nuclear, how energy dense it is, how many high paying jobs are attached to running a nuclear plant and like for like for workers transitioning from coal to Nuclear. The absolute tiniest bit of land for spent fuel storage. This interview was a bit of an embarrassment for Sky. Ted has for most of his policies got it right
Ted got it right for sure.... Except he's a politician, a compromised lier. Sorry, but someone has to play the sobering part of devils advocate. As Sam Kekovic would say, "You know it's true" 😅😂🤣
Germany is a good example of failed popular delusion based energy policy that Australia is currently following. We need to withdraw from the Paris Accord and simply use the most economical energy resources available.
Agree, and stop blowing up coal powered stations, there is nothing wrong with them just a little maintenance. Net zero and renewables is a huge scam destroying our energy, security, industry, economy & environment.
Best part is the entire renewable installation will have to be 100% replaced every 8 - 15 years. Money is no object with the worthless Labor party. China loves this, as do the super funds.
The false low cost using lcoe has to be debunked before valid system cost comparisons can be made. This is reasonable. Otherwise, total cost comparison is not possible.
Absolutely correct. LCOE is what amateurs and the uninformed use. Regardless, even the IEA states that LCOE must not be used to compare dispatchable baseload generation to intermittent variable energy, especially not when basing country or regional level decisions on it…. This nonsense from the green left must stop… or Australia will deindustrialise and lose living standards… FSCOE would be the minimum metric for comparison and even then EROEI is a key comparison metric… these both make it abundantly clear that intermittent renewables are the most expensive way to generate electricity when viewed as a complete system and even then costs in the real world are often even higher.
Grow up Laura. How many shares do you own in the "renewables" industry? PS - renewable energy infrastructure is renewable just like coal fired power stations. No one wants to say the costs over the life cycle of solar panels or wind turbines, including the costs of disposal of end of life materials. The whole debate is a joke if you won't compare full term costs with those of thermal power stations for example. The Indians and Chinese must be laughing at us while continuing to buy our coal hand over fist. Oh, and buying our gas at bargain prices and re-selling it for a profit on the global market. Australians don't deserve this country and the sooner it ends up in responsible adult hands the better. But do carry on with the kindergarten.
I do wish someone would come up with an answer to my question of who is going to own the nuclear power stations when they are built. If it is private, then we will be in the same boat that we are in now. Rising costs. Any business that owns these nuclear stations are of course going to want to make huge profits, and the way that happens is to put power prices up. Also will that power be sold to overseas countries at cheaper prices than we have to pay. We are virtually subsidizing these other countries to our detriment. I would love and answer to my question.
We need to stop selling out (or giving everything away including money) and owning our own energy system. Every means of generating energy is cheaper than renewables and net zero.
The fact you have to pay to view tells you whos behind it and why. The bright future portrayed 1950s Disneyland was rockets, space travel for all, flying cars... the Jetsons. All promises are hypnosis while people wait till nothing happens.... Oops to late, agenda done... and so are you...😅😂🤣💀
Higher CO2 is of course the Greenest policy by far, it makes plants and crops grow faster. Catch a private jet to eat some hamburgers in America - Make the world Green Again!
Don’t be weak Ted come out strong and tell Australians we will burn our domestic natural resources like coal and gas until we get nuclear up and running. Don’t be a jellyfish mate. Grow a backbone and smash this ridiculous Net zero bs. Show some leadership Dutton. Stop half arseing around. Do what’s right for Australians instead of looking after your mates in big business.
Trump's policies are spot on and will indeed make America profitable and powerful again. Australia must apply the same policies. Carbon captured clean coal, gas and eventually full nuclear.
Of course he would but may I remind you that when the CSIRO came out with nuclear estimate your side was quite scathing. So maybe this is too positive and maybe needs some further scrutiny. By the way, we still haven't seen the cost of nuclear. About time to come clean on that one.
CSIRO report was a scam, they had invited no experts present or had any real costings at a 2018 man cave meeting that deduced from the lack of interest present it was not viable, it was biased & not based on any scientific evidence, data, education, expert or professional input to the discussion, just a report to support funded agendas of a lobby group by a few guys sitting around having a beer, a failed pub test at best. CSIRO is not what it used to be and not worth the funding. AEMO is no better, they did a similar thing in giving a report to appease a funding lobby for renewables, the CEO of both organisations have made admissions to this recently in senate inquiries. AEMO’s report was not based on how to get cheap electricity, it was based on how to get energy without using any of our abundant fossil fuels or nuclear products, meaning their hands were tied to designing a system based on replaceable technology, the most expensive, frail & dagerous of all energy systems, it was a farce to suit Labor & WEF agendas, nothing to do with what is best fit or cheaper for Australia. Coal, gas, oil and nuclear are all cheaper, abundant, cleaner, reliable, energy dense and readily available options without requiring extra expensive & massive HV Grid infrastructure, millions of hectares of environmental destruction of forests, farmland and protected habitat areas of wildlife and plant species. The renewables scams are deliberately destructive and hugely expensive WEF initiatives to benefit elites, we are the carbon they wish to remove, Marxist, Communist, Socialist, call it what you like, it is inhumane, evil and treason. We need a complete govt reform, stop giving away our money, gas and resources, the corruption, donations, flooding immigration, renewables, WEF, UN, EU, WHO, Paris Accord, Climate Change Lies and unsustainable Net Zero & Woke Albo, Labor, Greens, Teals & Uni Party BS. We have 15 coal fired power stations and Labor want to blow up 6 in the next 5 years, we emit 1% of global emissions while decimating forests and trees and Pretty Boy Albo wants to give Xi $1.8 Trillion Dollars a year because they are a developing nation, my arse. China has 3100 and commissions 2 new coal power stations every week & emit 33% of global emissions, but at least are the biggest planters of trees than the rest of the planet put together. Drill Baby Drill, Make Aussie Great Again, we need a Trump approach, fire up the coal & Free gas, we are a developing if not crippled nation heading into a 3rd world status by sinister and incompetent govt’s & ministers taking the piss out of us with their lies, deceit and greed. Digital ID and MaD Bill is the beginning of the end if we dont get control back of these terrible politicians and their evil agendas. Vote One Nation or People First Party and give them power to help block some of this nonsense in the senate or we are F**ked. We should be a lucky country & a superpower, we need and deserve a better govt.
OK,stop subsidies and let the market decide .So you reckon Albanese and Labor have revealed the total cost of renewables !!Didn't we read the other day that they underestimated by over $ 500 billion?That's a hell of a long way to be out !!What do you reckon electricity will cost when that figure gets into the pricing ?Australia already has the most expensive electricity!!Shameful with our resources and there must be accountability!!
Did you even watch it ? Typical tactic of trying to discredit and shut down all information that contradicts your own thinking.... Didn't work very well in the USA did it ?
Wrong. Nuclear costing from construction to on-line is up-front costing and includes decommissioning. Chris Bowen will never tell you the real cost of renewables.
@@tikkabrno Why would I waste my time on that. I've already looked up the facts and concluded that, based on the girlfanning of this mockumentary by these propagandists, this is purely a propaganda piece. Similar to that of "Triumph of the will". There's a "documentary" I'm sure you'll like. ;)
Net Zero should be scrapped entirely .
It is all pain and cost for Australians , while making no change to weather events and climate at all.
Meanwhile China and other countries continue on their merry way...
Exactly, these muppets just spout the same crap about going towards renewable because it's all part of the same Net Zero scam from the WEF and Globalist wealth transfer agenda.
No, Albanese and Labor Party and Greens should be scrapped entirely .
@@georgemarijanovichboth net zero and Labour greens
@georgemarijanovich ...we should Stop them from. Travelling around the World for free.Than the emissions will drop at Once.
A great documentary exposing the 'misinformation' and idiocy on display with Albo and Bowen.
Liberals are no better . Sticking with the Paris Climate agreement is idiocy at it's finest.
They're only called renewable because you have to renew them every 15 to 20 years
Well said!
A job every 15 - 20 years. Is the rest of time leave?
Try 10-15 yrs if your lucky.
That is a maximum, though. It could be a lot less🤯😤
people who say they care about climate change but are against nuclear clearly really only care about politics = it should be clear to everyone by now that no one thing will fix the climate = it will take a mix including nuclear ☢
Dump the green nonsense😒
Bowen is a total dropkick who is responsible for causing financial hardship to vulnerable Australians.
EVERY Portfolio he has ever held has been a failure, it's his "specialty".
It's Bowen's style. No real job - only ever a leech on taxpayer dollars.
The cost of net zero is completely unrevealed and unknown.
Unfathomable would be closer.
It's infinite. Most "renewable" energy is net negative because more energy is expended on e.g. mining and transporting materials for solar panels and wind turbines, then smelting all the metals for the totally restructured cable network, and in the full fantasy constructing incalculable numbers of gigantic batteries.
Metals can't be smelted by wind alone.
@@andrewgraham7659 ....and the benefits totally questionable. I honestly believe Nett Zero is simply a method of extracting money from taxpayers to keep elites in a luxury lifestyle.
Bottomless pit of despair might as well be burning our money. The solar panels and turbines are so fragile and completely UN-RECYCLABLE its just insane and the trash it creates is worse than daily human waste
No, watch Ted Obrian at the ARC conference, the cost of renewables is mind blowing.
MAGA - Make Albo Go Away!
Best coment yet
Let the market decide with no subsidies; simple!
If there were no subsidies there would be no wind or solar farms because they are not economic .🇦🇺
They will argue that no companies would take the risk without subsidies !!Don't worry about the taxpayers,they have no choice.
Yeah. Makes it morally right to evade taxation doesnt it
@@davefoord1259No freebees to any participant in the energy market and that include tax relief, Then let them compete
You clearly haven't seen LNP Nuclear plan! Subsidised to the hilt mate! Because it costs a truckload of money to build and run.
li3bor must be voted out ASAP😤
Unfortunately they will be back in chaos next year
Albo is the Mr Bean of Australian politics.
Australia cant go renewables only, because it just won't work without base load power! Broken Hill was and very good example of this! A
Broken Hill is an example of what happens without transmission lines.
Broken hill is an example of power companies not working for power consumers. The big battery they had there wasn’t configured to actually run on island mode even though that’s what it promised. Only after 10 days did AGL agree to enable island mode.
Any power asset won’t deliver if the companies running them aren’t acting collaboratively
Wish they would not call them renewables ,there not as the materials to make them have to be mined and manufactured and maintained after construction. Then no one talks about recycling them after especially the toxic chemicals in solar panels.
There's solar panels recycling facilities being established in Queensland. So much for "nobody talks about"
Sack labor now
Unfortunately it won't happen 😢
The cat is out of the bag albo, you can’t deny it anymore
Albonzo the Clown and his trusty dog Toto .. a child's fantasy read by drag queens.
There would be no big cost if we just use our coal instead of everyone else using it
Many of our current government ministers obtained university degrees, however, they didn’t get degrees in common sense.
China are building 2 new coal fired power stations a week .... every week and have been doing so for some time. They also burn our coal while we suffer unaffordable power bills.
Should have a Documentary on all the Secreat Envelopes and Suppression lists.
Chris Ulman needs to do a Part 2 as to where all the money is going and why.
Follow the money trail. CCP handouts.
It's a very silly idea to go Net Zero because it's based on a lie.
I'm in favour of net zero communism
All to Reduce Australia's Global Carbon Emissions from 1.2% down to 0.7% by 2030 ....At What Cost to the Economy ?
Economy and Environment.
There is absolutely no utility in this course of action as the carbon dioxide emissions are actually beneficial.
Benefits include increased agricultural yields, reduced winter heating requirements, fewer deaths from hypothermia and postponement of the next glacial maximum.
Earthly carbon is a fixed quantity, so how is it going to be reduced? It can't be is the answer.
Laura is not a very good interviewer. At times she appears to be looking for opportunities to point score but does not have the knowledge to competently do so. Sometimes she seems distracted and at times disrespectful.
Sadly, she is trying to be more interactive rather than doing the important role of being a a unbiased interviewer of which she was doing very well.......the arrogance is really starting to show........do your job Laura......leave the comments to your guests.....
She seems to be pushing the WOKE climate SCAM narrative, just like the DEI scam. Truth will win !! and I hope we withdraw from the Paris Accord CON JOB.
Disagree. ABC is left, Sky is right and everyday it gets harder to work out the truth of what is really going on. Yes, her approach may come across as disrespectful/knowledge lacking at times but given the scope of what she covers, she cannot be an expert on every topic. At least there is a sense that she is trying not to give a "free ride" to either side of the debate. If you can do a better job of it, I will enjoy watching your interviews.
I like her. She seems to sensibly assume that if she’s talking to an LNP politician, that they’re full of shit and responds in an appropriate bored and indifferent manner. She might as well be interviewing a brick.
@@glennjackson1417
Can't be an expert on every topic because she is a child... She represents political optics for public consumption...
Laura, have you ever asked labor what their cost is for renewable??
We are already at net zero - amount of co2 Aussies produce is consumed by the number of trees!!!!
We are negative because of our natural sequestration.
We are now a world leader in environmental destruction which is radically reducing the CO2 offset by removal of natural forests and protected areas, wildlife & plant species.
CO2 is not a problem and the planet is fine, but we aren’t.
True, and that's on flawed figures, They're working on plants removing 11% of the C02, the true figure is 31%.
by a factor of 4
Laura, learn to listen, don’t talk over people. Renewables are the most expensive form of power generation.
Net zero is crazy. The idea of dangerous global warming from CO2 is false. Sure CO2 is a greenhouse gas, but its effect diminishes logarithmically so most warming from CO2 has already occurred. And Le Chataliers principle that a system reacts to counter any change to an equilibrium means the modelling is wrong, as they adopt positive reinforcement assumptions. It is absolutely clear they are overstating warming. Besides, slightly warmer temperatures with higher CO2 is great for greening the Earth and thus is already clearly evident. If fears of CO2 disaster are right the expensive transition to nuclear is the only way forward. The idea of near complete renewables will be an economic and societal disaster at massive cost.
We are emitting more Co2 than ever but we are living longer. Work that one out all you doomsayers.
So the Exxon and Shell scientists who studied this and correctly modelled what would happen... were somehow wrong?
@CraigHarvey What is it that they predicted and that has happened? The generally accepted average temperature is said to have risen slightly since 1970, but at a significantly lower rate than most models. And what are the effects? The world is greener, crop yields are higher, food is plentiful, people have never been so well off, deaths from natural disasters including weather are way down. I don't know what study you are referring to but if they predicted anything correctly it certainly wasn't a climate disaster.
@russellholmes8742 "Specifically, Exxon projected that fossil fuel emissions would lead to 0.20 degrees Celsius of global warming per decade, with a margin of error of 0.04 degrees - a trend that has been proven largely accurate."
That's why we're up to 1.5 degrees of warning in the atmosphere.
nuclear does not necessarily mean Uranium….. Australia also has huge resources in Thorium, which the Chinese are developing as we speak.
better still , thorium has already been mined and is sitting in tailings dams on mine sites all over the country waiting for recovery and use in reactors ! imagine reactors that run on dirt! [ mining waste], there is enough thorium in Mt Isa mines tailings dam alone to power australia for the next ten thousand years but wait, there's more! there is thorium on mars, on the moon, in asteroids , probably the whole universe is rich with it as its half-life is so long, fuel no matter where we go!
You've just answered your own question.... If we've got it, then it's China who will get it !!! Ha Ha Jokes on you....😅😂🤣
@ that would be the simple train of thought……. The intelligent person would ask if China would build a reactor in Australia.
China is using 56% coal for running there economy.
Why isn't Australian government, not using our own coal to keep prices down for all Australians ???
Labor and Greens Out
Replaced by the reluctant fake party who are under the same starters orders.
They are building 2 new coal fired power stations a week and have been for some times now. They also buy and burn our coal while we suffer from unaffordable renewable energy bills.
@GazGuitarz That's why Labor and Greens want Misinformation and Disinformation to pass.
Vote one nation
I think most sensible people knew or had an idea we were being taken as fools over the cost of renewables and their viability!
Cant stand this Sheila, I reckon she's a labor supporter 🤨
Net zero by 2050 meaning...... we want as the government to have a population of net zero by 2050
Real cost only a couple hundred million humans
Tax gas properly. Start talking about how much money you gonna save the working class by taxing the gas properly.
Pauline is a exception stay strong
There was nothing new in Chris Ulman's documentary, if you have been following the renewables debate. The destruction of our beautiful environment is the true cost. Bowen's Folly.
Bowen: Mr Magoo of Australian politics.
I will watch that tonight
Arrest Bowen now.
Laura - much as I like you - shut up and let him finish his answer... bit too keen on this one young lady, the answer is forthcoming but for your interruptions...
Laura is a bit of a leftie in my opinion. Always looking for the negatives in her questioning. How about asking some intelligent questions about Nuclear, how energy dense it is, how many high paying jobs are attached to running a nuclear plant and like for like for workers transitioning from coal to Nuclear.
The absolute tiniest bit of land for spent fuel storage.
This interview was a bit of an embarrassment for Sky. Ted has for most of his policies got it right
Yep. She gets a bit too chummy with Tanya Plumber'sCrack for my liking.
Ted got it right for sure.... Except he's a politician, a compromised lier.
Sorry, but someone has to play the sobering part of devils advocate. As Sam Kekovic would say, "You know it's true" 😅😂🤣
Net zero by 2050 will send Australian society back to the Stone Age.
This guy is beyond clueless.
Just build a few new coal power stations
Nobody is stopping the market from doing that. Mustn't be any money in it? The Callide replacement ran over cost by tens of millions.
Germany is a good example of failed popular delusion based energy policy that Australia is currently following.
We need to withdraw from the Paris Accord and simply use the most economical energy resources available.
Agree, and stop blowing up coal powered stations, there is nothing wrong with them just a little maintenance.
Net zero and renewables is a huge scam destroying our energy, security, industry, economy & environment.
Best part is the entire renewable installation will have to be 100% replaced every 8 - 15 years. Money is no object with the worthless Labor party. China loves this, as do the super funds.
Just remember - the Coalition still supports net zero. They remain part of the problem. Slightly better than Labor, but still not good enough.
Nut Zero no thanks Get out of Paris and UN Climate Agreement CONS Two wings of the same bird hey Teddy
SHOULD BE ON FREE TO AIR, TO REACH THE MASSES.
LNP and ALP. Same Same.
The false low cost using lcoe has to be debunked before valid system cost comparisons can be made. This is reasonable. Otherwise, total cost comparison is not possible.
Absolutely correct. LCOE is what amateurs and the uninformed use. Regardless, even the IEA states that LCOE must not be used to compare dispatchable baseload generation to intermittent variable energy, especially not when basing country or regional level decisions on it….
This nonsense from the green left must stop… or Australia will deindustrialise and lose living standards…
FSCOE would be the minimum metric for comparison and even then EROEI is a key comparison metric… these both make it abundantly clear that intermittent renewables are the most expensive way to generate electricity when viewed as a complete system and even then costs in the real world are often even higher.
A trillion dollars may not be enough 😂
Must say not a fan of Laura, little bit one eyed and too quick to jump all over people.
Grow up Laura. How many shares do you own in the "renewables" industry?
PS - renewable energy infrastructure is renewable just like coal fired power stations.
No one wants to say the costs over the life cycle of solar panels or wind turbines, including the costs of disposal of end of life materials. The whole debate is a joke if you won't compare full term costs with those of thermal power stations for example. The Indians and Chinese must be laughing at us while continuing to buy our coal hand over fist. Oh, and buying our gas at bargain prices and re-selling it for a profit on the global market.
Australians don't deserve this country and the sooner it ends up in responsible adult hands the better. But do carry on with the kindergarten.
China deployed more renewable energy last year than the rest of the world combined.
Loving the paywall you have it stuck behind
I do wish someone would come up with an answer to my question of who is going to own the nuclear power stations when they are built. If it is private, then we will be in the same boat that we are in now. Rising costs. Any business that owns these nuclear stations are of course going to want to make huge profits, and the way that happens is to put power prices up. Also will that power be sold to overseas countries at cheaper prices than we have to pay. We are virtually subsidizing these other countries to our detriment. I would love and answer to my question.
We need to stop selling out (or giving everything away including money) and owning our own energy system.
Every means of generating energy is cheaper than renewables and net zero.
First priority will be to reverse the ban on Nuclear.
It’s a pity it was only on pay TV I would love to watch it
The fact you have to pay to view tells you whos behind it and why. The bright future portrayed 1950s Disneyland was rockets, space travel for all, flying cars... the Jetsons.
All promises are hypnosis while people wait till nothing happens.... Oops to late, agenda done... and so are you...😅😂🤣💀
The bigger pity is they beam Sky into regional areas on free to air. Gotta rot the brains of Nationals voters somehow.
Where is the link pls
Higher CO2 is of course the Greenest policy by far, it makes plants and crops grow faster.
Catch a private jet to eat some hamburgers in America - Make the world Green Again!
The chances of this eventuating is zero. It is physically impossible to achieve with current technology.
It's quite simple - Net Zero is impossible within the laws of physics, which not even Genius Bowen can overturn.
True, we should be looking at real zero not net zero which is propped up by accounting trickery.
If the government thinks we need or want this.
Put it to another referendum you sly government
Can't push the like button.
Frontier Economic’s report didn’t adjust for deflation as most reports do. That’s largely why they got 5x the cost by 2050.
Don’t be weak Ted come out strong and tell Australians we will burn our domestic natural resources like coal and gas until we get nuclear up and running. Don’t be a jellyfish mate. Grow a backbone and smash this ridiculous Net zero bs. Show some leadership Dutton. Stop half arseing around. Do what’s right for Australians instead of looking after your mates in big business.
We need a Trump.
If you don't care about carbon emissions then why would you even build nuclear?
Nuclear = safe and cheap
If they worked they would spell it labour. Even their name is deceptive
Trump's policies are spot on and will indeed make America profitable and powerful again. Australia must apply the same policies. Carbon captured clean coal, gas and eventually full nuclear.
This same crap is happening in the UK, Labour governments in UK and Australia come from the same shit hole,
Excellent program. But reason is wasted on children, imbeciles, and ideologues... That's what we're dealing with here...
WEF, UN, EU, Paris Accord & China.
come on Ted answer the question mate….. we know you’re right, but just answer the question
Sack black out Bowen he is a idiot if he fails he should pay the expenses back
Homer Simpson was hilarious on Monday when he took four attempts to claim he was misrepresented. And this is the best they can come up with. LOL
If they had any sense they would put Homer in witness protection. He is the Australian equivalent of Bobby Kennedy Jr.
Of course he would but may I remind you that when the CSIRO came out with nuclear estimate your side was quite scathing. So maybe this is too positive and maybe needs some further scrutiny. By the way, we still haven't seen the cost of nuclear. About time to come clean on that one.
CSIRO report was a scam, they had invited no experts present or had any real costings at a 2018 man cave meeting that deduced from the lack of interest present it was not viable, it was biased & not based on any scientific evidence, data, education, expert or professional input to the discussion, just a report to support funded agendas of a lobby group by a few guys sitting around having a beer, a failed pub test at best.
CSIRO is not what it used to be and not worth the funding.
AEMO is no better, they did a similar thing in giving a report to appease a funding lobby for renewables, the CEO of both organisations have made admissions to this recently in senate inquiries.
AEMO’s report was not based on how to get cheap electricity, it was based on how to get energy without using any of our abundant fossil fuels or nuclear products, meaning their hands were tied to designing a system based on replaceable technology, the most expensive, frail & dagerous of all energy systems, it was a farce to suit Labor & WEF agendas, nothing to do with what is best fit or cheaper for Australia.
Coal, gas, oil and nuclear are all cheaper, abundant, cleaner, reliable, energy dense and readily available options without requiring extra expensive & massive HV Grid infrastructure, millions of hectares of environmental destruction of forests, farmland and protected habitat areas of wildlife and plant species.
The renewables scams are deliberately destructive and hugely expensive WEF initiatives to benefit elites, we are the carbon they wish to remove, Marxist, Communist, Socialist, call it what you like, it is inhumane, evil and treason.
We need a complete govt reform, stop giving away our money, gas and resources, the corruption, donations, flooding immigration, renewables, WEF, UN, EU, WHO, Paris Accord, Climate Change Lies and unsustainable Net Zero & Woke Albo, Labor, Greens, Teals & Uni Party BS.
We have 15 coal fired power stations and Labor want to blow up 6 in the next 5 years, we emit 1% of global emissions while decimating forests and trees and Pretty Boy Albo wants to give Xi $1.8 Trillion Dollars a year because they are a developing nation, my arse.
China has 3100 and commissions 2 new coal power stations every week & emit 33% of global emissions, but at least are the biggest planters of trees than the rest of the planet put together.
Drill Baby Drill, Make Aussie Great Again, we need a Trump approach, fire up the coal & Free gas, we are a developing if not crippled nation heading into a 3rd world status by sinister and incompetent govt’s & ministers taking the piss out of us with their lies, deceit and greed.
Digital ID and MaD Bill is the beginning of the end if we dont get control back of these terrible politicians and their evil agendas.
Vote One Nation or People First Party and give them power to help block some of this nonsense in the senate or we are F**ked.
We should be a lucky country & a superpower, we need and deserve a better govt.
Green Voodoo
Really how about the real costings if there are any for the Coalitions nuclear power proposal or should we say concept
TED ..... dont beat around the bush.... try being honest
OK,stop subsidies and let the market decide .So you reckon Albanese and Labor have revealed the total cost of renewables !!Didn't we read the other day that they underestimated by over $ 500 billion?That's a hell of a long way to be out !!What do you reckon electricity will cost when that figure gets into the pricing ?Australia already has the most expensive electricity!!Shameful with our resources and there must be accountability!!
Am I still allowed to comment? 😏 or censoruum ultimatuum? ☺
❤ Angel Samael 🌹
black out bowen lies lies and more lies
LOL
This is an extremely ignorant and whith out genuine scientific imperial evidence of the stratosphere of the planet.
😂😂😂😂😂DOCO BY THE SKY/FOX/NO CREDIBILITY MAGA MEDIA 🤣🤣🤣🤣
It's Fair 🤣🤣🤣🤣& 😂😂😂Balanced 🤪
Watch it and do a deep dive fact check. Are you capable?
Yeah but Chris Uhlman came from the ABC.
@@jayhellyer5406😂😂😂😂 💯
Did you even watch it ?
Typical tactic of trying to discredit and shut down all information that contradicts your own thinking....
Didn't work very well in the USA did it ?
Sheep baa baa , whaa whaa whaa
The cost of nuclear is unknown and nuclear isn't even on the table.
Do you not see the contradiction and logic fail of your comment? 😂😂😂
Did you not listen to what he said? 🇦🇺
Are you serious right now
Wrong. Nuclear costing from construction to on-line is up-front costing and includes decommissioning. Chris Bowen will never tell you the real cost of renewables.
The cost is known, don’t you know there are nuclear stations in a lot of country’s in the world, we just have to ask them.🇦🇺
One Nation
Net zero Net bull SHIT
Everyone knows it’s a scam coal is king
Cheapest form of energy on the planet.
What has happened to Bowen's Base load "Gas fired Generator's" as they are critical to the reliability of system.
ROFL. I'm sure that as far as documentaries go, It's right up there with "This is Spinal Tap" or "Mermaids: The body found", Teddy.
;)
Watch it and give it a fact check.
@@tikkabrno Why would I waste my time on that. I've already looked up the facts and concluded that, based on the girlfanning of this mockumentary by these propagandists, this is purely a propaganda piece. Similar to that of "Triumph of the will". There's a "documentary" I'm sure you'll like.
;)
@trickyboy1517 ok bubble boy
@@tikkabrno Stones and glass houses, mate.
;)
@trickyboy1517 Lol... Talk about wilful ignorance...
Booomer nonsense
Yep, Labor's plan certainly is. That's probably why no other industrialised country would dream of putting all its eggs in the wind/solar basket?
Dumb comment,achieves nothing. Boomers fault,for a change,not Trump
@@awc900 Make hay whilst the sun shines, the other 18 hrs we can drink beer in the dark.