I think I'd rolled my eyes 10 times by the time Crumption tripped up in the snow. But I fell in love with Amundsen at 'I hope you stay with me until you are terrified.'
Robert Crumption couldn't have appeared any more condescending, pompous, arrogant & wretchedly RUDE! What a S.O.B. His argument doesn't always cut the mustard. At 47 minutes he is shown to be gutted, which was a delightful end to part 1. 😊
William Shakespeare the actor was the son of illiterate parents and his children were also illiterate. There are only about six records of William Shakespeare's own handwriting, all his signatures which are terrible & it appears that he only learned to write his name. There is no record of William Shakespeare actually owning any books. It is probable that William Shakespeare the actor was also illiterate himself and could not possibly be the author of the works in his name.
Not a single thing you wrote is true, except the part about the books. We have no records of anything he owned besides the sword he left his friend and the bed he left his wife. His older daughter was definitely literate and his father was the town mayor and a justice of the peace. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. And his signatures (as well as three pages of a play in his handwriting which you forgot to mention) all look just fine if you can read 16th Century handwriting.
His daughter signed her name Susanna Hall in a neat secretary hand on two occasions years apart but in a similar way. Nothing like a barefaced lie to show conspiracy theorists for what they are. Also his brother Gilbert signed his name neatly as Gilbert Shakespere.
Verdi, the only composer to truly successfully write operas based on Shakespeare, had illiterate parents living centuries after Shakespeare. Illiteracy in a period where most people were illiterate is not a sign of stupidity. Writing comments like yours is
That young Red head dude is mad heated this gentleman knows something cool about shakespear he doesnt. Jealousy all over the face. A very good example of being educated and being wise.
@Reality Effect its the reality of today, you have dipshits that go to a ivy school to learn a watered down history than you have someone thats wise who has a open mind and studies 100 differnt materials on the subject. People that go to college are dumb. I went to college to. the teachers were fried, i knew more than them.
I love how Crumpton was using his phd as a driving credential over Amundsen and that Venus and Adonis was in his phd...yet he wasnt aware of such a unique and important picture as that in St Alban's!!
@@-jz5mm Crumpton is an English actor living in Spain. He's cast whenever they need an American CIA type for a Spanish movie or TV show. He has a fairly substantial social media presence, none of which mentions his doctorate. An actual Shakespeare PhD would have been able to answer the goofy things Amundsen was claiming.
@@sonjak8265 He also says typographical errors were rare in Early Modern printing, which is the exact opposite of the truth. Anyone writing a dissertation relating to Shakespeare would know this. Crumpton is following a script, and his academic credentials are nowhere to be found outside of this program. He is portraying an arrogant scholar so that when he can't answer Amundsen's challenge (as any actual scholar could), it will seem more of a victory. The footage of actual Shakespeare scholars is lifted from programs about Shakespeare. The 53s that seemingly show up coincidentally are staged. This show is a crock from beginning to end.
Who truly authored Shakespeare's works? Is William Shakespeare a pen name, and do we want to delve into the secrets and darker aspects of his past life? Do we wish to uncover the mysteries and shadowy aspects of William Shakespeare's life, or whether he was indeed a pseudonym?
In the Merry Wives of Windsor isn’t there an impetuous student named William who has a Welsh teacher? The place where Shakespeare went to school had a Welsh teacher (Jenkin). Some people miss the forest for the trees and like to see connections and codes in everything.
Don't be so hard on Robert, he's acting, teaching through acting, like what that one Rosicrucian expert said about Shakespeare, and I hated his tone but once I understood, I was tipping my hat.
I subscribe to the fundamentals of the Shakespeare Authorship Question - but these supposed “code breakers” can make anything translate to anything by converting from one code to another code to another number until they eventually find what they want to. Alexander Waugh has applied just as “logical”/“absurd” codes to the same texts show that it was actually Edward de Vere as the secret message
To me, this just shows that Shakespeare and Johnson were close to Bacon, nothing to do with writing his works. Maybe the rosicrutions originated from their friendship? Two of the greatest minds of the time, would it be surprising if they influenced one another?
The arrogance of that red hair guy common , you are not in kindergarten anymore, grow up ... This is soooo exiting , everything he say is interesting !I'm hooked
I wouldn't look at what is possible. Possibilities are endless. You have to get a feel for what precisely the man himself would think. A person's brain does a thing. It leads you places. Yours, mine, and Shakespeare. He had to learn everything piece by piece. He would repeat processes learned as time unfolds. You should not study Shakespeare as a static human being, but rather as an evolving human being. His codes should have improved over time. Maybe I'll spend some time on this myself.
Funny people believe in Shakespeare's seven steps to mercy and yet the Bible and Jesus are full of mercy and yet they're deemed as fairy tales. For that matter there's no proof that Shakespeare ever existed
St. Patrick's Day is also 173, 17th of March. Any connection there or just coincidence? Fr. Luke Wadding introduced St. Patrick's Day & he was a well educated friar who would I'm sure have been aware of the Rosicrucian's.
Just coincidence. Nobody numbered months until the 20th Century, and the new year started on March 25 (until 1752), so March wouldn't be the third month anyway.
No mention of Edward de Vere the most popular choice apparently. Right at the end of the series a dude says if you have an idea of what you want to see you ll see it. The degree of work required in covering up and revealing the identity of Shakespeare is just ridiculous. The project is trash tv.
This is the excact problem with the new generations. A person has an opposing opinion and the guy wants to do nothing but humiliate the other man without question. Absolute garbage opinion driven documentary.
@Reality Effect Its good to see your passion. Please don't apologise for passion. Shakespeare and his contempories were weavers of stories. ...for entertainment. Take care not to get caught in the web of deception. History, our roots, are a very different matter . All the best, 🤝🏾😊 Don't be blind, keep an open mind ❤
If I was an English person, I'd defend against this surmise with every fiber of my being. As an American who loves Shakespeare's works, I can only say that nothing positive can come from Mr. Amundsen's efforts. If false, he is a hack trying to rile up people enough to sell a few books. If true? A cause for sorrow. I wouldn't want to hear the like of a Lessing or a Faulkner was a fraud, and that their great works were done by someone else.
You love "Shakespeare"? What does that mean? There is little evidence to connect the Stratford man to the works. And you don't need to resort to "codes" to conclude that Oxford is the more likely author. Open your mind there kid.
Not all 33rd degree masons are super heroes. As a Mason i can tell you its a relatively easy thing to be. One need only be a master Mason and join the York right, then the knights Templar. It only takes about a year.
They didn't have 33rd degree Masons during Bacon's lifetime. In fact, Masonic guilds were made up of builders. Their "secrets" were mathematical formulae for building walls and arches. They didn't begin admitting non-builders ("Freemasons") until the middle of the 16th Century.
Aemilia Bassano has a connection, for who would know of Italian Court and the nature of the Mediterranean Jewry, in the quagmire of Elizabethan London?
@@thebrickton1947 I do love her memory. And Emilia Bassano never left England, either. He father's family were baptized Christians going back at least three generations. They were from Venice, which was tolerant of Jews, so the Bassano family had no need to pretend to be Christians of they were actually Jewish. Finally, Shakespeare didn't know about the Venitian Ghetto, and thought Shylock was the only Jew in Venice.
I'm not buying it. Your first example breaks its own rules, as the 'on' isn't vertical but horizontal; I am hoping the rest isn't so demonstrative of twisting facts to suit theories.
@@Jeffhowardmeade highly doubt it. Hes a stage actor not a screen actor and actual contempt and frustration is hard to fake. You could feel the tension at times between them.
@@Rob-vs8ye His film and TV credits are pretty easy to look up. Plus he doesn't have the PhD the character he is playing claims to have, and apparently doesn't know simple things about Early Modern printing practices that any Shakespeare scholar would know. It's a classic con. If the "expert" can be convinced, whatever is claimed must be true!
@@reginald_1458 The expert is a shill. They pretend it's just a coincidence that they take off from Gate 53. I don't think it's a psyop, I think it's a joke. The producers found this crackpot and decided to make a tongue-in-cheek "documentary" akin to the BBC's 1958 "news" report on the bad spaghetti harvest in Italy. Look that one up. It's a hoot. Like that one, I wouldn't be surprised if this one was originally broadcast on April 1.
You realize that host is synonymous with actor right? And yes he is narrating a script written after the fact but reactions are reactions. n@@Jeffhowardmeade
@@Rob-vs8ye Just as long as you understand that nothing in this program is true. If they had brought in an actual Shakespeare scholar and gotten his or her natural reactions, it would have been a much shorter program. The scholar would have explained the truth about 17th Century printing practices, and Petter's "discoveries" would have evaporated.
@@Rob-vs8ye Depends. Does every documentary hire actors to pretend to be experts and then make false claims? If so, then yes, all docs are fake. If, on the other hand, a doc on astrophysics is hosted by Neil DeGrasse Tyson, who is an actual astrophysicist, and he stating things which are factually correct, then that would not be fake. I don't think you're getting the part where Crumpton is not a Shakespeare PhD, and what he is saying is not true. If he were, he would know that Isaac Jaggard's print shop was using type cast in France, where the language has no W. Hence he used two Vs to make uppercase Ws and ran out of those, hence his use of lowercase Vs to make the rest of the Ws in the poem opposite the engraving of Shakespeare. He would not make the claim that printers circa 1623 rarely made typographical errors, when in fact they would make corrections mid print run, but would still use the misprints, which were too valuable to toss. Books printed in the early 17th Century are typically RIDDLED with errors, and were typeset by teams of compositors who often spelled words different ways. This whole program is faked, right down to Crumpton getting on his flight at Gate 53.
I think I'd rolled my eyes 10 times by the time Crumption tripped up in the snow. But I fell in love with Amundsen at 'I hope you stay with me until you are terrified.'
Bloke is definitely questioning himself. You can see it a few times. Gets a shock and goes all fingers in ears
Gets way to emotional about it and takes it almost like a personal attack on himself.
Robert Crumption couldn't have appeared any more condescending, pompous, arrogant & wretchedly RUDE! What a S.O.B. His argument doesn't always cut the mustard. At 47 minutes he is shown to be gutted, which was a delightful end to part 1. 😊
Then he did his job well, considering he's an actor following a script.
They set this redhead up something fierce. He is the perfect pompous pratt.
I'm sure he would be flattered, considering that he's an actor playing a perfect pompous pratt.
William Shakespeare the actor was the son of illiterate parents and his children were also illiterate.
There are only about six records of William Shakespeare's own handwriting, all his signatures which are terrible & it appears that he only learned to write his name.
There is no record of William Shakespeare actually owning any books.
It is probable that William Shakespeare the actor was also illiterate himself and could not possibly be the author of the works in his name.
Not a single thing you wrote is true, except the part about the books. We have no records of anything he owned besides the sword he left his friend and the bed he left his wife. His older daughter was definitely literate and his father was the town mayor and a justice of the peace. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
And his signatures (as well as three pages of a play in his handwriting which you forgot to mention) all look just fine if you can read 16th Century handwriting.
His daughter signed her name Susanna Hall in a neat secretary hand on two occasions years apart but in a similar way. Nothing like a barefaced lie to show conspiracy theorists for what they are. Also his brother Gilbert signed his name neatly as Gilbert Shakespere.
Verdi, the only composer to truly successfully write operas based on Shakespeare, had illiterate parents living centuries after Shakespeare. Illiteracy in a period where most people were illiterate is not a sign of stupidity. Writing comments like yours is
I find it difficult to believe just one man wrote so many plays without any help.so many codes in the work amazing
Other playwrights of the era were far more prolific than was Shakespeare. Two plays a year was nothing.
...I enjoyed watching the dudes ego getting utterly destroyed inch by inch, so much so that he just had to get away before he exploded 😂😂😂
That's why they included in in the script. This is cynical drama at its basest.
Less of a destroyed ego and more of his eyes were opened.
This is a great series. And I love how, once the redhead is past his truth trauma, he's able to enjoy the adventure. Thanks for sharing!
It's a very well crafted story. It's not real, but it is well crafted.
@@Jeffhowardmeade Thank you, oh wise one, for coming along and setting this ignorant child straight.
@@enlightenedhummingbird4764My pleasure.
That young Red head dude is mad heated this gentleman knows something cool about shakespear he doesnt. Jealousy all over the face. A very good example of being educated and being wise.
@Reality Effect its the reality of today, you have dipshits that go to a ivy school to learn a watered down history than you have someone thats wise who has a open mind and studies 100 differnt materials on the subject. People that go to college are dumb. I went to college to. the teachers were fried, i knew more than them.
@Reality Effect don’t worry about it, good speaking with you sir. Keep up the good fight.
I love how Crumpton was using his phd as a driving credential over Amundsen and that Venus and Adonis was in his phd...yet he wasnt aware of such a unique and important picture as that in St Alban's!!
What PhD? He's an actor, not an actual scholar.
Really?! @@Jeffhowardmeade
@@-jz5mm Crumpton is an English actor living in Spain. He's cast whenever they need an American CIA type for a Spanish movie or TV show. He has a fairly substantial social media presence, none of which mentions his doctorate.
An actual Shakespeare PhD would have been able to answer the goofy things Amundsen was claiming.
@@Jeffhowardmeade He says in the film that he is writing a Ph.D.
@@sonjak8265 He also says typographical errors were rare in Early Modern printing, which is the exact opposite of the truth. Anyone writing a dissertation relating to Shakespeare would know this. Crumpton is following a script, and his academic credentials are nowhere to be found outside of this program. He is portraying an arrogant scholar so that when he can't answer Amundsen's challenge (as any actual scholar could), it will seem more of a victory.
The footage of actual Shakespeare scholars is lifted from programs about Shakespeare. The 53s that seemingly show up coincidentally are staged. This show is a crock from beginning to end.
Nice contents. Interesting to watch. Keep up the good work. 👍
the "experts" think the truth stops at what they are taught
Who truly authored Shakespeare's works? Is William Shakespeare a pen name, and do we want to delve into the secrets and darker aspects of his past life?
Do we wish to uncover the mysteries and shadowy aspects of William Shakespeare's life, or whether he was indeed a pseudonym?
Only if there's evidence, and not hokey codes.
In the Merry Wives of Windsor isn’t there an impetuous student named William who has a Welsh teacher? The place where Shakespeare went to school had a Welsh teacher (Jenkin). Some people miss the forest for the trees and like to see connections and codes in everything.
Don't be so hard on Robert, he's acting, teaching through acting, like what that one Rosicrucian expert said about Shakespeare, and I hated his tone but once I understood, I was tipping my hat.
I subscribe to the fundamentals of the Shakespeare Authorship Question - but these supposed “code breakers” can make anything translate to anything by converting from one code to another code to another number until they eventually find what they want to.
Alexander Waugh has applied just as “logical”/“absurd” codes to the same texts show that it was actually Edward de Vere as the secret message
Far too many adverts. Impossible to watch… a pity
Edward De Vere Earl of oxford is the real William Shakespeare.
Wait... gate 53? That's insane.
That's in the script.
@@JeffhowardmeadeMr. Howard how do you know this
@@-jz5mmUh... the fact that they emphasized it? Have you ever seen a documentary where the gate number they're flying out of is mentioned twice?
To me, this just shows that Shakespeare and Johnson were close to Bacon, nothing to do with writing his works. Maybe the rosicrutions originated from their friendship? Two of the greatest minds of the time, would it be surprising if they influenced one another?
The arrogance of that red hair guy common , you are not in kindergarten anymore, grow up ... This is soooo exiting , everything he say is interesting !I'm hooked
I wouldn't look at what is possible. Possibilities are endless.
You have to get a feel for what precisely the man himself would think. A person's brain does a thing. It leads you places.
Yours, mine, and Shakespeare.
He had to learn everything piece by piece. He would repeat processes learned as time unfolds.
You should not study Shakespeare as a static human being, but rather as an evolving human being.
His codes should have improved over time.
Maybe I'll spend some time on this myself.
at 53 minutes I was Gobsmacked.......next episode I will be eagerly anticipating 106 minutes,where,oh where will this Divine Comedy lead us?
Where is Part 4?
Cognitive Dissonance seriously settles in at the 47 minute mark. It can be scary.
This is a game of “Six degrees of Francis Bacon”; one could start with any text and then be up at any famous figure
I love Lord Bacon.
There is clearly something here, there is evidence
Funny people believe in Shakespeare's seven steps to mercy and yet the Bible and Jesus are full of mercy and yet they're deemed as fairy tales. For that matter there's no proof that Shakespeare ever existed
Put enough letters on a page and you can interpret anything in any way.
Garbage in = garbage out.
You’re statement doesn’t reflect the consistency and accuracy of what you consider ‘random’ facts
Nope. It was Bacon and De Vere. The Earl of Oxford had the knowledge and the God given skill.
Bacon couldn't crack a joke to save his life, and Oxford was a terrible poet. Just read some of the poems he published under his own name.
@@JeffhowardmeadeDude……. Lord Bacon was the man….
@@richwhiteman2755 Just not the funny man. Shakespeare was a very funny man.
@Jeffhowardmeade you must have an obsession eh! I've seen you in every comment 😅
@@OntarioAtOrion Everyone needs a hobby.
They have way too much time on their hands in Norway.............
UA-cam made this impossible to watch.
34:40 Sadly, the majority of people have NO interest in being educated or getting educated but always want to be entertained 🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
St. Patrick's Day is also 173, 17th of March. Any connection there or just coincidence? Fr. Luke Wadding introduced St. Patrick's Day & he was a well educated friar who would I'm sure have been aware of the Rosicrucian's.
Just coincidence. Nobody numbered months until the 20th Century, and the new year started on March 25 (until 1752), so March wouldn't be the third month anyway.
I was thinking King John the V Shakespeare and was his pen name?
I'm not waiting two more years. One of those you had hacking me even said that's FAR too long.
its at least likely they were all in that RC group
There was no RC group in England at that time.
I thought it was Ed Sheeran narrating.
No mention of Edward de Vere the most popular choice apparently. Right at the end of the series a dude says if you have an idea of what you want to see you ll see it. The degree of work required in covering up and revealing the identity of Shakespeare is just ridiculous. The project is trash tv.
The music is too loud and distracting.
go TO page 22
This is the excact problem with the new generations. A person has an opposing opinion and the guy wants to do nothing but humiliate the other man without question. Absolute garbage opinion driven documentary.
Other than academic curiosity, who cares? Why is this "terrifying"?
So they take their SAS flight out of gate 53 and no one noticed?
Only the guy writing the script.
What difference does it make?
@Reality Effect fairy snuff
@Reality Effect Its good to see your passion. Please don't apologise for passion.
Shakespeare and his contempories were weavers of stories. ...for entertainment.
Take care not to get caught in the web of deception.
History, our roots, are a very different matter .
All the best, 🤝🏾😊
Don't be blind, keep an open mind ❤
@@nicolarollinson4381 says the person who said this was fairy stuff. As a Mason I can tell you its very accurate.
@@TSVTheHive I was replying to another comment. Fairy snuff- fair enough
GATE 53 😮 WhAaaaaat!?? That was odd eh!
If that doesn't tell you the whole thing is faked, what will?
If I was an English person, I'd defend against this surmise with every fiber of my being. As an American who loves Shakespeare's works, I can only say that nothing positive can come from Mr. Amundsen's efforts. If false, he is a hack trying to rile up people enough to sell a few books. If true? A cause for sorrow. I wouldn't want to hear the like of a Lessing or a Faulkner was a fraud, and that their great works were done by someone else.
Bible code done, Shakesphere done. What next , Cracking Confucius" Code? Good luck with that.
There was something by that DaVinci guy, but it never caught on.
You love "Shakespeare"? What does that mean? There is little evidence to connect the Stratford man to the works. And you don't need to resort to "codes" to conclude that Oxford is the more likely author. Open your mind there kid.
Little evidence? What idiot have you been listening to, and why did you believe it without looking at the mounds of evidence for yourself?
no such thing as coincidence.
Francis bacon wrote all of Shakespeare's work and the king james bible he was a 33 degree freemason 💯
Not all 33rd degree masons are super heroes. As a Mason i can tell you its a relatively easy thing to be. One need only be a master Mason and join the York right, then the knights Templar. It only takes about a year.
They didn't have 33rd degree Masons during Bacon's lifetime. In fact, Masonic guilds were made up of builders. Their "secrets" were mathematical formulae for building walls and arches. They didn't begin admitting non-builders ("Freemasons") until the middle of the 16th Century.
Aemilia Bassano has a connection, for who would know of Italian Court and the nature of the Mediterranean Jewry, in the quagmire of Elizabethan London?
If Shakespeare had some connection to Italy, he wouldn't have gotten everything wrong about the place.
@@Jeffhowardmeade By your avatare, I see you're invested, and love your mammy proportionately, good for her.
@@thebrickton1947 I do love her memory.
And Emilia Bassano never left England, either. He father's family were baptized Christians going back at least three generations. They were from Venice, which was tolerant of Jews, so the Bassano family had no need to pretend to be Christians of they were actually Jewish.
Finally, Shakespeare didn't know about the Venitian Ghetto, and thought Shylock was the only Jew in Venice.
This dude actually gets mad every time he's forced to open his mind a little.
He's just an actor. It's in the script.
This channel does come out with the most dire nonsense
😊
Well he has a Phd surely he cant be wrong😂
Since he doesn't actually have one, I suppose he can be a wrong as he wants to be.
I'm not buying it. Your first example breaks its own rules, as the 'on' isn't vertical but horizontal; I am hoping the rest isn't so demonstrative of twisting facts to suit theories.
It's amazing what you can find when you set the bar so low for what constitutes a "discovery".
the ginger is in hard cope
The ginger is an actor. He's acting.
@@Jeffhowardmeade highly doubt it. Hes a stage actor not a screen actor and actual contempt and frustration is hard to fake. You could feel the tension at times between them.
@@Rob-vs8ye His film and TV credits are pretty easy to look up. Plus he doesn't have the PhD the character he is playing claims to have, and apparently doesn't know simple things about Early Modern printing practices that any Shakespeare scholar would know.
It's a classic con. If the "expert" can be convinced, whatever is claimed must be true!
@@Jeffhowardmeade So this documentary is just a psyop? What's your opinion?
@@reginald_1458 The expert is a shill. They pretend it's just a coincidence that they take off from Gate 53. I don't think it's a psyop, I think it's a joke. The producers found this crackpot and decided to make a tongue-in-cheek "documentary" akin to the BBC's 1958 "news" report on the bad spaghetti harvest in Italy. Look that one up. It's a hoot. Like that one, I wouldn't be surprised if this one was originally broadcast on April 1.
Does this sound like a bunch of UFO Chasers looking to write a book and get rich off of it
worst host ever. just rude and in denial with overwhelming evidence to at least connect the two men. how many grains of sand make a mountain buddy?
He's an actor following a script. He's not an actual Shakespeare scholar. If you've got your panties in a bunch, it's because you were meant to.
You realize that host is synonymous with actor right? And yes he is narrating a script written after the fact but reactions are reactions. n@@Jeffhowardmeade
@@Rob-vs8ye Just as long as you understand that nothing in this program is true. If they had brought in an actual Shakespeare scholar and gotten his or her natural reactions, it would have been a much shorter program. The scholar would have explained the truth about 17th Century printing practices, and Petter's "discoveries" would have evaporated.
@@Jeffhowardmeadeand by your logic every documentary is fake.
@@Rob-vs8ye Depends. Does every documentary hire actors to pretend to be experts and then make false claims? If so, then yes, all docs are fake. If, on the other hand, a doc on astrophysics is hosted by Neil DeGrasse Tyson, who is an actual astrophysicist, and he stating things which are factually correct, then that would not be fake.
I don't think you're getting the part where Crumpton is not a Shakespeare PhD, and what he is saying is not true. If he were, he would know that Isaac Jaggard's print shop was using type cast in France, where the language has no W. Hence he used two Vs to make uppercase Ws and ran out of those, hence his use of lowercase Vs to make the rest of the Ws in the poem opposite the engraving of Shakespeare. He would not make the claim that printers circa 1623 rarely made typographical errors, when in fact they would make corrections mid print run, but would still use the misprints, which were too valuable to toss. Books printed in the early 17th Century are typically RIDDLED with errors, and were typeset by teams of compositors who often spelled words different ways.
This whole program is faked, right down to Crumpton getting on his flight at Gate 53.
what a load of rubbish
his phd is utterly worthless
Considering he doesn't actually have one and he's just an actor, I agree.
boring
This dudes ego and closed minded attitude are offensive
Complain to the director who told the actor to pretend to be closed-minded.