Midway (2019) - Pearl Harbor Attack (just combat scenes)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 кві 2020
- Somewhat overlooked last year's movie despite of decent production value.
As much as I love the original Pearl Harbor movie and it's depiction of the Japanese
attack, I got to say I'm more impressed with this one. Then again, it is 20 Years later... - Фільми й анімація
Saw the movie in 4DX in the cinema, this scene was one of the most terrifying of the whole movie. It took my breath away.
I don't understand why is this movie so underrated, it holds its own against widely accepted Pearl Harbour from 2000.
@@ipman3358 there is no need to attack someone who has different opinion to yours. I happen to enjoy the cgi alone so much that I can forgive the rest. Not epic but decent movie, on par with pearl harbour 2001.
@@ipman3358 How you like that?
@@ipman3358 the heck you mean this is history
Except for the japanese AA
Terrifying??? This scene is pure love. Watching the right people beeing shot for once
Knew a few Pearl Harbor Veterans in 1990 when I lived on Oahu, they would tell me about the tapping you could hear all day and night by the men trapped in the battleships. Most of the tapping ended right before Christmas. 😔
Imagine being a relative to those trapped, so close but so far at the same time. And there is nothing you can do about it.
@@pibmovieclips , many with burn injuries. In total darkness. God Bless them. 😔
@@4700_Dk Definitely one of the worst ways to go. Stuff of nightmares for the people who witnessed that. Might we never see such horrors again.
Amen.
@@4700_Dk Oh, one more thing Tom, I would be highly interested of what you have to say about my video - Saving Private Ryan, movie that changed my life - it is hour long, but I would appreciate your feedback and I think it does deserve more exposure - if you would like to.
Yamamoto: WHAT DO YOU MEAN THE CARRIERS WEREN’T THERE?!??
@watcher_one one exactly…
Yes
@@lvlc6023congratulations, they brought 2 nuclear bombs to their home land XD
They had no choice after the U.S. oil embargo. Japan would have run out of oil for every car and ship and plane by early 1943 if they weren't able to get oil from the Dutch East Indies. Imagine if the tables were turned regarding oil and the USA was being cut off from oil and Japan has all the oil in the world so Japan could steal Hawaii, Alaska, and the Philippines. What the USA did by trying to kill the Japanese Empire via oil starvation was a hostile act of war. USA also was sinking German ships long before December 1941 and became WWII combatants the second the Lend Lease Act and Destroyers for Bases Act were passed. Germany and Japan were allies.
@@elbatrai418
where are native americans,
🪳🇺🇸🪳🇨🇳🪳🇷🇺🪳 broke some international laws,n🪳 🇺🇸🪳 made black history again of their short history.
The CGI may be more advanced than Pearl Harbor, but this looks more like a video game version of the attack. Give me Tora! Tora! Tora! any day of the week. The effects may be dated, but the film still makes a powerful impact, not to mention having a great score from Jerry Goldsmith.
The visuals in this movie looks like battlefield 5
Battlefield 5 looks this good :)?
the pacific theater in bf 5 actually caught my eye. But yeah bf5 doesn't look that good, but the saturation and the hue of this movie is kinda same with bf5.
Lot of realism. I love it!
@@pibmovieclips No, the movie looks this bad ))
i love how the litte girl disobeying her mother by not immediately coming to her is included as the description says "just combat scenes"
there is shown carnage in the background as the little girl is observing what is happening, those extra 4 seconds in between total are kept for more fluent transitions. Trust me, about 22min cut into about 5 instead even if its not that obvious.
Tbh that's one of my favorite shots in the whole movie. Really conveys how shocking the sudden onset of war was, and frankly how frightening the battle was for those in Oahu at the time, soldier and civilian. Watching the mother do a double take when she sees what's happening out on the water. She's so scared, but she needs to protect her girl. Chokes me up everytime.
1:56 when you log on to see that someone griefed your Minecraft world:
XD
Lol
Or when you log on to see someone has griefed your docks in World Warships
Or when you log on to see your base been raided in ark
It's 2021, we deserve a proper Pearl Harbor movie...
Tora! Tora! Tora!, albeit 51 years old, is still quite good, particularly the Japanese POV.
2001 Pearl Harbor depiction of the deaths of OK and AZ were top notch. Those scenes alone made that movie a damn good movie for me.
We deserve just ONE proper Spanish Armada movie, but I'm not holding my breath...
Funny how a movie from 2001 can look a 100 times better than a movie from 2019. You know why that is, Real sets, real explosion, real boats and practical FX combined with CGI. VS CGI only.
I was really torn on this one. I mean some parts - including the one in thumbnail - to me looked more convincing. But just the fact that there is nearly 20 years difference and I can't make up my mind speaks volumes about the 2001 version.
Well we have to remember there was a very limited to this one compared to the 2001 when bay was in it's hayday and had support from the mavy as well, a potentially good movie that fell short, i still consider tora tora tora the much better movie compared to the 2001 movie, but credit where is due, they did try their best to be more historically accurate and did felt like an older war movie
The thing is, special effects are often more expensive than CG. In a film like Pearl Harbour, that’s ok, because they only recreate, what, two battles? In Midway, though, they recreate a number of battles. It’s easier, safer, and less pricy to do it with CG.
Yeah, this looks more like a scene from World of Warships or something.
This was the only scene ik that has bad cgi
the special effects of aircrafts exploding is bad relative to the effect they managed to do in dunkirk with real planes and model planes. also, the over the top suicide dive bombing skills and how every single torpedo and free fall bomb would just meters off the target is giving audience unrealistic expectation on the difficulty of those bomb runs. over the top japanese AA fire (they only showed the twin 25mm type 96 but in reality those were for short range and japanese got large carlibra long range AA gun as well, tho japanese AA fire were very weak) also ruined the movie for me. But over all, very much true to history, and they got all the ships and planes models right, far better than Pear Harbor by michael Bay which blows up a bunch of modern missiles destroyers and showed us aircraft carriers with steam catapult in the pacific war
Thank you for this constructive feedback, I couldn't put it better myself, and I see it pretty much the same way. Except the Pearl Harbor part :D, I'm bit torn about which on is ultimately better, as the original one had more "cinematic" feel, and genuinely put more emotion into it. Which I appreciate.
Yeah I guess this movie was just going for a more cinematic feel in exchange for a more realistic one. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but if you're looking for ultra realism, this might not be the movie for you. I still do like the scene where they just show the massive size of the Japanese air force. You just see them slowly creep in and get larger in numbers as the camera zooms out, it's honestly a fantastically shot scene and it really goes to show the giant scale of things when it comes to war.
no movie is realistic,even the movies people consider to be realistic.so stop with that internet bullshit
@@bigben9056 yeah lol
Ya know how plane explode right?
Nothing can kill Bjorn Ironside
I didn't expect him to go this early either...
Except Katniss Everdeen
The Best movie i ever seen in 2019 👍
You're in a minority here mate just if you did like it, never mind calling it the best movie of 2019 :D.
That would be a long stretch to call it that for me as well.
There are a couple of movies that come to my mind as best of 2019 (that I have seen) - Joker (2019),The Gentlemen (2019),1917 (2019), Alita: Battle Angel (2019),The Highwaymen (2019),Triple Frontier (2019) and maybe even Avengers: Endgame (2019) could go on that list.
Each of those I would consider better than Midway - but Midway would be right after them and is in my opinion (as mentioned in description) a very good movie.
To name the best movie of 2019 out of those, I would have to struggle a lot and change my mind many times, but If I had to chose but one of them - I'll call The Gentlemen (2019) because I laughed a lot on that one. Super-fun.
My great grandpa was looking for wounded soldiers in the ships that got attack
Top 10 biggest "oof I will regret that" ever made
Please, elaborate. Do you mean that the producers should be ashamed that they did this? Is the movie such an embarrassment?
@@pibmovieclips I think he means the attack
@@thatsnomoon4221 that would make sense ;) and he would be most likely correct.
Imperial Japan: Hurr durr bomb America cuz they're weak
America: Say Hello to my little friend
My mothers uncle, so my great uncle was a survivor the day the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor. My grandfather on my dads side fought the Japanese during WW2 and my grandfather on my mothers side fought in the Korean War. I wish I could of met one of them. They died long before I was born. Their generation was full of honor, courage, and integrity. I’m currently serving in the Army and it’s an incredible honor.
Also, this is a bad ass movie.
Yes we salute them. I hope your proud of them
The real attack the Japanese wouldn't fly that close together.
But that wouldn't be so cinematic ;), audience demands entertainment!
Some dude inside Arizona was peeling potatoes
It feels like im watching some video game cutscenes
It was truly fortunate that that day, in Pearl Harbor, there were no aircraft carriers, which had gone out early in the morning to carry out an exercise. Yamamoto's real objective was not the fleet, but the aircraft carriers and fuel tanks in the port, so that he could destroy the main force of the American Pacific Fleet and take the United States out of the war before it even entered. That day, 9 battleships, 3 cruisers and 3 destroyers were sunk or destroyed, including the 2,500 casualties of the attack. The Americans, however, would have taken revenge by launching an air raid with 16 B25 bombers, led by Jimmy Doolittle, on Tokyo, although risky and which, due to the distance and the absence of the necessary fuel, would have landed on Chinese territory, (one landed in USSR), leading to the death of 7 people.
All three of the Pacific Fleet's active carriers were on their way back to Pearl Harbor, but not on an exercise, and they had in fact departed Pearl Harbor between days and weeks earlier. Enterprise and Lexington were returning from aircraft ferry missions (respectively to Wake Island and Midway). Enterprise was supposed to have been in port on the 6th but had been delayed by bad weather; she was 150 miles out on the morning of the 7th and immediately changed course to pursue (fruitlessly) the Japanese fleet. Saratoga was en route to Pearl Harbor from a maintenance layover at San Diego Naval Station and picking up a new airgroup at NAS North Island.
80th Anniversary
1941-2021......
RIP to Servicemen at Pearl Harbor
Very Intensifying, but interesting scene 🇺🇸🎖️
Fuck usa bitches colonial idiots go home what doing other countrys colonial bitches later time i hope usa go finish fuck bitches japan real soldats usa pussy
I gave you a like and subscribed, because of how much time/care you spend replying to every comment shows you must be a great person. God Bless
I like to exchange and share ideas about things that I'm passionate about. Thank you for your support and kind words! :)
お互いにごめんなさいだね
これからは同じ過ちを繰り返さないで
日本もアメリカも仲良しでいよう
どちらの国も亡くなった人のために平和で🕊
This was the day battleships became obsolete.
Oh, that was already clear before (Bismark sunk on its first voyage ultimately doomed by a Swordfish biplanes...) - but sure, this was the last nail into "battleships' coffin", since it didn't even matter as long as the carriers were safe. Everything was about the carriers after that.
Who needs a battleship, if ~6 planes could in theory take it down (even if suiciding), or cripple to the point of certain doom.
Machine guns made infantry obsolete, tanks machine guns,
planes - EVERYTHING :D
- until ICBM with nuclear warheads, that can't be used though at all to resolve anything anyway.
So technically, in conventional warfare - planes are on top of the food chain. That being said, all of the other pieces are still needed, it's just they stand no chance against the "top dog", should they be the unlucky target.
Numbers ultimately still rule, there is still a place for something that can have numbers - easy to make/have. Battleships sadly can't. The investment wouldn't make any sense.
It was great while it lasted!
RIP to Bismark, Yamato, Hood and Iowa class Battleships!
Problem with that is look at how no U.S. battleships came close to sinking after Pearl Harbor, when the sailors were at low readiness and even opened the doors to the hatches because it was not close to wartime readiness (Oklahoma capsized bc the hatch doors on one side only were all opened. California and West Virginia also sank so easily because they opened all the hatch doors because there was a fleetwide inspection check by admirals soon). Prince of Wales and Repulse were sunk by land based Judy bombers which were massive bombers like B-25s, not small carrier planes and the idiot British Vice Admiral didn't call for air support at all. The Judys carried much larger torpedoes than the Kates. If those were Kates only trying to sink Prince of Wales and Repulse without any surface ships and submarines finishing them off they would have been able to escape and survive easily. That being said the "battleships are dead" only works when talking about the British because their battleships sucked at dodging torpedoes and aerial bombs unlike the American battleships.
It turned out that the U.S. battleships had incredible turn radius quickness and nimbleness and could easily avoid torpedoes and aerial bombs due to how quickly they could spin in place and maneuver, especially the battleships from Colorado class going backwards to earlier BBs. That "battleships are dead" meme really only applied to the British, Germans, and Japanese. The U.S. battleships served exactly like how they were supposed to, as a Swiss army knife adaptable to change and not the laughable UK-style Tsushima and Jutland wannabe hero ships from decades ago. Best designed battleships ever were the American BBs and they helped to win WWII thanks to how none of them came close to sinking when actually in wartime mode despite so many torpedo hits, aerial bombs, shore artillery hits, and kamikaze hits on them.
No, that was on December 10th when HMS Prince of Wales and HMS Repulse were sunk by Japanese aircraft with minimal Japanese losses
@@nogoodnameleft I hate to break the news to you, but EVERY battleship designed or built before WWII (all of them) was intended to fight other battleships. They were relegated to offshore artillery platforms when axis battleships stopped coming out to fight, where Axis air superiority had been ended or reduced. I see no mention of Taranto here, where the Italian battleships were attacked by British Swordfish biplanes that sank 4. This was the action that cemented Admiral Yamamoto's plan for Pearl Harbor.
The movie visuals were made by DICE using the frostbite engine
Gracias por el video.
1:51-1:53
That was the scene of arizona attack
1:47
There's footage of the real explosion taken from a hospital ship, it's incredible. It's here on youtube if you search for it
Wars are so nice only in movies. Don't like to see another wars.
I think what you meant to say is: Wars are nice to look at in movies, but not in real life.
Comparing the same CGI scenario between Midway (2019) and Pearl Harbor (2001); Midway feels like a video game cinematic.
この攻撃のとき、空母部隊がいなかったのは、アメリカにとって最大の幸運だった。日本は奇襲で空母を叩けなかったことで、勝利への道を失った
What else can you say? Was the great kamikaze also on their side?)
The war might have seemed like it was going to last longer...right up to Nagasaki. The Manhattan Project would not have been delayed by worse setbacks in the Pacific...though delivery might have been through Alaska instead of Tinian. There was no "path to victory" for Japan; only the hope of one against a nation that eventually crushed multiple opponents on 2 wide fronts with a massive industrial base. Things would have been dicier on all fronts if Britain had fallen before Pearl Harbor but that didn't happen. Britain is a big, unsinkable aircraft carrier.
This movie is awesome. I love the action scenes and the drama in it
After a long time, a supporter ;)
Obviously you havent got a clue about the attack at pearl
@@raymonddianela4695 Please elaborate :)
@@raymonddianela4695 Really? This scene looks pretty historically accurate. They have Battleship Row, when the US put their Pacific Fleet in a row. It made the ships much easier to target. But I don't remember recalling the Japanese actually attacking the island of Oahu itself.
@@dat1_you need to review your Pearl Harbor history
As much as I love the historical accuracy of this scene, it really bugs me that they didn't show anyone of the native Hawaiians or non-white Americans reacting to the attack.
A lot of the Japanese American laborers living on Hawaii when Pearl Harbor happened would go on to join the 442nd Nisei, the most decorated U.S. infantry regiment of all time.
I found the "historical accuracy" of the Pearl Harbor scenes somewhat wanting. It's Hollywood, not history, but the Midway bombing scenes did not disappoint.
0:54 こんな高度から魚雷を落としません
Let’s see if you ask me:
“Tora! Tora! Tora!” >> that my friend is the real deal
“Pearl Harbor” >> well got real flying scenes but not so historically accurate
“Midway” >> I don’t know why they even bothered…
I think that is excessively harsh to Midway for god knows what reason.
I'm just glad anytime that we get a "decent" WW2 movie - instead of 1.2 IMDB rating money-grab scam staring one "star" (in the past - Bruce I'm looking at you) that there is a total plague of now.
Midway was more than watchable and I'm glad they made it in the first place - not like they could have expected box office hit with this one. They made it because somebody clearly wanted to do it.
But to convince investors, you need to do "questionable" decisions for the sake of it - you know how corporate operates.
2:23 You're hearing someone burning alive.
The second zero flying sound like a Formula 1 0:10
Thousands died but 3 hero’s were born A black man who disobeyed orders and instead man a machine gun the other 2 were 2 American pilots who shot down Japanese planss
And 2 of those 3 heroes served in the Doolittle Raid.
The black man should have disobeyed, having been disrespected, humiliated, and still treated as a third-class citizen throughout his life. Japanese soldiers would have let black people live if they surrendered and did not take arms for US. Shamefully, they made the wrong choice.
It was this moment that Japan knew he fu*** up
Exchange in Midway, yes. Technically Pearl Harbour too, no important target = carrier had been sunk, since they hadn't been there. Instead, in the following exchange at Midway they managed to lose 3of their own for a price of one.
@@pibmovieclips what us carrier was lost at midway?
@@genghiskahn1989 Yorktown?
Japan never thought about it, at least not in this early stage of the war.your just talking in a meme kind a way...tiktok kids..oh nonononono.
@@raymonddianela4695 yea i just found it on tiktok
Who did better job depicting the Japanese attack? The original Pearl Harbor (2001) movie, or this one?
@飛蛇流星X把路路飛砍頭 Oh, thanks for the correction.
This one
Midway
The 2001 movie over-exaggerated things like USS Arizona's explosion for example, plus there were scenes where there were modern day destroyers there which.... doesn't make sense
Like goddamn Michael Bay :P
@@CENsystem lol I didn't even notice that there was modern day destroyers, I have to go watch the movie again just to have a laugh. Last time I seen the movie was in the cinema when it came out, and I was a teenager that wouldn't spot such things yet. However, I must confess that I did enjoy a lot the original 2001 pear harbor movie. I would struggle to answer my own question. I like both movies, probably equally.
In both movies they got it wrong.
Yes
Bjorn ironside had his ship hit on the side
The digital effects are way to overblown, I wish they would go back to a more documentary-style cinematography. You dont feel anything. Its like on of these "World of Warships" video FMVs.
nice movie you hav to see him
🔥mind heck🔥 /rips🔥
Akagi is so proud
they paid in full thrice3 one head commander 2 cities 100kkkk? i dont know how many
The last music that comes up is from Fruity Loops 😍.
Do you know the name of the song ?
ua-cam.com/video/XcL7v0Fc6g8/v-deo.html
The Americans repaired and made the ships battle ready within months lol
1:47 USS Arizona is Exploded by the Japanese Bomber
This, and a couple seconds after is why I don't understand when people call this a crap CGI mess. To me it looked like a "well done" maybe even impressive looking CGI.
Nankin? Squad 731??? Where the movie about it?)
Ignoring the cgi I did enjoy this movie tbh
Are there only Pennsylvania class battleships in the row? (OK! You can see a hybrid battleship with cagemast next to Arizona, he he!)
Tell me more! I would love for someone who would be competent to analyze the movie in historical accuracy into detail. I love that stuff! :)
thats the suppose to be the west virginia but wrong model
@@pibmovieclips ua-cam.com/video/f6cz9gtMTeI/v-deo.html
This video is comprehensive enough to allow you to match up some of the shots and vessesl involved. It was a terrible attack, but visually, not like this scene at all.
@@theorncampbell4432 That is a fantastic video, thank you very much!
Another enemy is repeating this mistake
2:22 Wait why are the Swords & Sandals 1&2's screaming sounds used here 💀💀💀
Yes
Yeah LOLLL
互いに仲良くなりたい🤝
Ok the battleship towers and guns are all wrong but this scene is terrifying
Use headphones
esses são os sinais do fim dê tudo o quê nos perturbava!!!beijo emiliana do manejo.
80 anniversary attack on Pearl Harbor
4:39 OMG they killed Kenny!
Much better than the actual Pearl Harbour movie
I still give credit to the first one as well, there is 20 years between them after all.
@@pibmovieclips true but it is Michael bay with just explosions for the sake of looking cool
@@omarbaba9892 damn right, but I have no particular problem with that, as long as it is somewhat accurate :D
@@pibmovieclips the pearl harbour movie is hardly accurate
@@GaryJones69420 that depends how deep into details you want to go in. On the surface, the date is right and basic description of the events is also. It doesn't have to be 100% accurate in every minute detail. Just don't deceit or purpose with agenda. Small alternations that otherwise don't skew the general historical narrative for the purpose of better (or easier) cinematography are more than acceptable. In my opinion.
The pearl harbour scene was very disappointing. The rest of the film was actually kind of accurate minus some details here and there. But the pearl harbour scene looked rush, like amateurs did the research. Same angle of the arizona blowing up as Bay's Pearl Harbour. Plus the Japanese Kate Torpedo planes dropping their loads right in front of the battleship row and not from the side was a real dead give away of research put into this scene. You dont drop a torpedo at the stern, you hit a ships flank!
Another thing.....the Arizona just about sank instantly when it exploded. You even see it in the real footage. Her bow blows up and crumples into the mud....she does really list as shown in the film.
Anyway, I do hope pearl harbour gets a proper modern film made about it, cause other then tora tora tora (absolute masterpiece) their aint much that does it justice.
The attack scenes are shamefully unreal.like on battleship row...if your goin to make an epic.make sure its right.We owe it to our veterans.
The angle of attack of the first wave of the torpedo planes is truly the worst possible and quite the opposite to the real one (optimal). Second wave is coming at 90 degrees as it should. Something tells me that somewhere along the way of production, some of the backers really wanted flying planes along and in between the ships for a cinematic shot. 2001 version was also guilty of this although at least they started at 90 degrees.
Agreed. Why is it so hard for them to make realistic combat scenes? Watching this is just pathetic and disrespectful.
@@Zyfe Because average viewer would not spot it, and they wanted the most cinematic shots as possible for better "action". You know, it wouldn't be exciting enough when average action from Hollywood these days is about the main character escaping death by a second, every second for minutes in length (to keep us in our seats). Simply put, in this way it will make them more money, and that is a fact. I'm just glad that we still make WW2 movies.
imaby bc its a movie?
@@pibmovieclips That "first wave of torpedo bombers" were Zeros on strafing runs down BETWEEN the battleships. This is the part that makes even less sense to me. They were supposed to be overhead, watching for P-40's.
Lieutenant Roy Pearce KIA on December 7th 1941
That character is fictional, as far as I know.
Song at the end? 5:18
ua-cam.com/video/t8bbtcSC-t0/v-deo.html
Enjoy!
Why were the guys at the start just standing there watching???
shock. Obviously
They had never witnessed a torpedo attack before, especially on their own ship & with no declaration of war. Yes, shock.
I enjoyed most of this movie, especially the Midway dive bomber sequences, but this Pearl Harbor bit was fatally Hollywooded. I can't imagine the Zeros, meant to be top cover for the Japanese bombers, spending their time on strafing runs DOWN BETWEEN THE BATTLESHIPS IN BATTLESHIP ROW, where they'd be in the way of their own bombs. That was all cinema & ZERO history right there, & this clip starts with it.
0:54
Did that pilot just drop his bomb in the water?
That was 100% a torpedo. But to be honest, they would have dropped them way sooner at much lower altitude and certainly at perpendicular angle to their targets. So still not accurate - not even tiny bit. Looks good though, right?
@@pibmovieclips Ye
@watcher_one one yes they are, but they have to be dropped at a low altitude at a certain angle. Otherwise they wont be accurate
This movie was attack on pearl harbor
Edit: attack on pearl titanbor movie
Backsound?
Sadly, my mic must have been recording :/, me noob
It would be really interesting to do a fan edit of I BOMBED PEARL HARBOR/TORA!TORA! TORA!/PEARL HARBOR and the attack scenes in this movie.
I might do that, If I get some time. Quite a good idea.
@@pibmovieclips I tried editing TORA! and PEARL HARBOR on VHS. Worked out.
This the new World of Warships?
You wish.
more a test of the gods on how we humans all react on making war.
wow this movie must be old
If this is "old", how old could YOU possibly be?
Why did the movie pearl harbor movie from 2001 look better then this in 2019?
A lot larger budget aimed as AAA blockbuster with a lot of practical effects. This one was made as "straight for TV" 99% CGI.
But in my opinion they are on par with the visuals anyway (due to being 20y apart).
Shit, Dat is Bjorn Lothbrook
Habra una pelicula donde lanzan las dos bombas atomicas en japon 😅
June 1942......
零戦が対艦攻撃をしているなんておかしいぞ
To me the right word there is "absurd", not "strange". The Zeros were escorts, not ground attack aircraft. Flying BETWEEN the superstructures of the ships on Battleship Row? Ridiculous.
إسم الفيلم
Its not action drama like Bays Pearl Harbor
Destroying battleships with 2 machine guns
*What the f*^k*
And 2 canons but still XD
They were destroying the soldiers lol
I did like this movie but cgi can never compete with real sets and explosions etc. it’s also why LOTR looks SO much better than the hobbit, 3 years a pro production to build sets, costumes and perfect makeup for orks and others creatures
fair, but the petrol barrels explosions of Michael Bay are so unrealistic look of an actual explosions for that sake of theatrics, that it ruins it almost completely for me to the point of being equal to the CGIs.
fair, but the petrol barrels explosions of Michael Bay are so unrealistic look of an actual explosions for that sake of theatrics, that it ruins it almost completely for me to the point of being equal to the CGIs.
@@pibmovieclips thats true, unless an actual accelerant would be involved in real life, like it shows a gas station blowing up or a tanker truck or whatever I really would like to see more realistic explosions. more blast less rolling fireball
@@dothedewinme That was my point, it was obvious that the "fake" fireball did no structural damage to the ships at all, and it was pure theatrics. I wanted to see real pressure waves tearing stuff up and bending metal.
@@pibmovieclips Apart from the modern ships in 2001 Pearl Harbor I thought the CGI explosions looked better especially in battleship row. Might be just me though.
Siquiera Miller Se Cargó A Un Zero Antes De Morir
where is Ben Afleck?
1976 Midway better film, this wasn't bad!
Just trying to figure out how pearl harbor came out in 2001 and has better more realistic scenes than this movie
It has a shit ton of practical effects implemented in it, which always looks better than CGI only.
...If you ignore all the anachronistic guided missile frigates in the background, unnecessary love stories & such. They tried to do better than "Tora, Tora..." & were only a partial success.
@@pibmovieclips I try not to judge movies with historical content solely on their explosion effects. It helps to get the story right, too. Want realistic explosions? "Avatar" does that...
Roosevelt lo sabía, por eso zarparon los portaaviones
Apparently this movie is very historically accurate but I’ve seen more than one movie like this one or some kid is just staring with this blank expression on their face I can tell you if that was me at that age I would not have a blank expression on my face I’d be freaking out and running to my parents telling them what’s happening.
Events are accurate, combat is rather laughably inaccurate. The blank faces are likely though. Mind you, USA and Japan were not at war at that time. Most people didn't even know that there was any tension between the countries. The attack came "out of the blue" and most thought it must have been some kind a drill at first, before shit started to blow up.
i like war movie
GRRR this made me wanna smash my iPad!
O.O why?
The old movie pearl harbour looks better to me. 😢
But still not as good as Tora!Tora!Tora!
@@pibmovieclips what is tora?
@@baxterismyyoutubename5077 a movie: ua-cam.com/video/udT1M8Md4Yw/v-deo.html
@@pibmovieclips ok..
Thw CGi are way over the top
Well, just released Tora Tora Tora (1970) clip, that one is different level of Pearl Harbor with no CGIs.
😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢
Actually
They attacked the whole damn island
I'm sure they were contemplating showing ALL that, but the film would be another half hour longer. Perhaps it was the producers who told them no way. Its supposed to be about midway after all. Shame, this looked fantastic.
They didt attack the submarine base and the fuel tanks so the us navy would be up and running in the Atlantic soon
if japan had limited resources how did they build 353 planes?1 that doesnt make sence
They had limited fuel specifically, the US cut them off their fuel and their reaction was to take it instead.
They had colonial ambitions.
0:44 Sorry but this is too bad..
This short
USS ARIZONA destroyed on December 7th 1941
All those japanese pilots are gonna be on the naughty list for sure.
I Know Nukeman The 501s StormTrooper
Yes. And...?
Thanx you japan ❤
Is this video game 😂
Early 2000s war movies are way more better than all newly made movies