Neptune Missile How it Works | Ukraine Missile Vs Russian Cruiser Moskva Ship

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 570

  • @Aitelly
    @Aitelly  Рік тому +56

    Please Subscribe and turn on Notification Bell

    • @Gryffoon
      @Gryffoon Рік тому +3

      Neptune missile is a soviet design

    • @SanjayKumar-Singh-o7v
      @SanjayKumar-Singh-o7v Рік тому +2

      I did this

    • @kikaev1980
      @kikaev1980 Рік тому +2

      No, the Neptune Missile was developed by the Ukrainian design bureau "Luch" in the period from 2014-2020. It was adopted in 2020.@@Gryffoon

    • @Gryffoon
      @Gryffoon Рік тому +2

      @@kikaev1980 no the neptune is mainly a copy of the soviet missile Kh-35. Kh-35 is a soviet design.

    • @VALMOX
      @VALMOX Рік тому +1

      Check it out my LEGO version of the Neptune❤

  • @The136th
    @The136th Рік тому +265

    I like to add some info from Chinese sources here. 1-2yrs before the Ukraine War, a Slava-class cruiser participated to a joint naval exercise with the Chinese Navy. The Chinese launched a UAV to simulate a sub sonic missile attack on the Russian cruiser, the cruiser's air defence failed twice. The UAV was eventually shot down, but I forgot if it was by the cruiser or by something else. The poor performance of the Moskava wasn't a surprise to the Chinese at all.

    • @Oles..
      @Oles.. Рік тому

      The Ukrainian Navy has never participated in any exercises with China. Where do these stupid myths come from?

    • @triadwarfare
      @triadwarfare Рік тому +1

      Was the results of the Chinese war games known to Ukraine and the western collective prior to the invasion?

    • @taktuscat4250
      @taktuscat4250 Рік тому +37

      @@triadwarfare definitely if a random guy knew about it

    • @spreddyreds9408
      @spreddyreds9408 Рік тому +1

      Chinese would have wondered if they supplied the defence to Russia.😂😂

    • @The136th
      @The136th Рік тому +13

      @@triadwarfare Western military probably know about it considering lots of Chinese speaking military watcher knew about it.

  • @marvinthemartian9584
    @marvinthemartian9584 Рік тому +173

    The reason that the Neptune missiles got through is because the Moskva was being held together by duct tape and wishful thinking. The main gun was down due to a hydraulic leak, five out of the six AK-630 ciws down and they were being used as spare parts for the one good one. The fire control radar for the sams was off because it interfered with the satellite radio. The main engines had been pushed well past their service life and could only manage a top speed of 12 knots. The rudders were partially jammed and could only turn a maximum of 20 degrees. Plus, due to rampant theft, all of the ships fire extinguishers were locked up and only the admiral had the keys.
    Other than that she was a fine ship and in perfect working order.

    • @garykong7597
      @garykong7597 Рік тому +22

      I like the last sentence lol

    • @hamilcar358
      @hamilcar358 Рік тому +9

      What is your source for this?

    • @jpx1508
      @jpx1508 Рік тому +10

      UPDATES/WEATHER: Russia's claimed stormy weather was bogus. US Navy reported WINDS CALM W/ NO WAVES. Video/photos confirm.
      UPDATES/OPTION 3: Moskva defensive systems were in poor repair and partially inoperative (per previous RF Navy audit of Moskva). Moskva sailors were conscripts distracted by an immediately-prior and ongoing attack by Byraktor drones. The conscripts miss-interpreted the incoming Neptune missiles as a part of the ongoing drone attack. 8 seconds later many of them were dead...

    • @piotrd.4850
      @piotrd.4850 Рік тому +5

      Radar turned off due to interference with sattelite radio? That's Sheffield excuse.

    • @danielhandika8767
      @danielhandika8767 Рік тому +1

      Wtf?

  • @jpx1508
    @jpx1508 Рік тому +33

    UPDATES/WEATHER: Russia's claimed stormy weather was bogus. US Navy reported WINDS CALM W/ NO WAVES. Video/photos confirm.
    UPDATES/OPTION 3: Moskva defensive systems were in poor repair and partially inoperative (per previous RF Navy audit of Moskva). Moskva sailors were conscripts distracted by an immediately-prior and ongoing attack by Byraktor drones. The conscripts miss-interpreted the incoming Neptune missiles as a part of the ongoing drone attack. 8 seconds later many of them were dead...

    • @eduardosaborio8239
      @eduardosaborio8239 Рік тому +6

      There was a report that said that they had to constantly disable the radar since it interfered with the communications systems. It wouldn't surprise me if it was the case

    • @Conserpov
      @Conserpov Рік тому

      Ukrainians found out about the fire on the Moskva from Russian state news.
      Cope and seethe.

    • @АлексАлекс-щ7ъ
      @АлексАлекс-щ7ъ Рік тому +3

      500 dead

  • @chrysllerryu4171
    @chrysllerryu4171 Рік тому +82

    SCENARIO 3. the crew never expect ukraine will attack them in such bad weather condition so they don't bother to man the radar at all

    • @Ybvvv
      @Ybvvv Рік тому +12

      Exactly! And some air defense systems were faulty due to insufficient technical training of the crew. This is russia

    • @josssun
      @josssun Рік тому +10

      If your crew doesn't expect to be attacked during war, it's a bad crew

    • @Ybvvv
      @Ybvvv Рік тому +3

      @@josssun maybe in your country. But it’s just a regular crew in russia

    • @MsVarush
      @MsVarush 10 місяців тому

      You just don't understand how warship works.

    • @mikhaileskola3581
      @mikhaileskola3581 10 місяців тому

      Погода была хорошая ,через два часа добрались спасатели ,по видео видно волны не было..

  • @Gushik
    @Gushik Рік тому +42

    Good job! The Neptune is amazing! rip moskva

    • @mskatia9940
      @mskatia9940 Рік тому

      Rip USA sponsors of wars around the world

    • @ayooo454
      @ayooo454 Рік тому +3

      @@mskatia9940 cry more

    • @mskatia9940
      @mskatia9940 Рік тому +1

      @@ayooo454 you will cry😌killer

    • @ayooo454
      @ayooo454 Рік тому

      @@mskatia9940 why did you delete your comment nazi?

    • @ayooo454
      @ayooo454 Рік тому

      @@mskatia9940 you are saying it for 9 years 🤣 the only people who cry are nazi killers that are your nationality) just as moskva sailors)))))

  • @ryanthompson5761
    @ryanthompson5761 Рік тому +57

    There was a report on the Moskva, and it was grime, the Russians put her to see with multiple problems.
    Which Include:
    There was only 1 out of 6 AK630 working the other was cannibalised for parts
    The Engines was well passed there service date, and was locked into half speed due to overheating and couldn't be used without the admiral permission.
    The Generators worked at random.
    The Fire Control Radar wasn't turned on as it interfered with comms and was turned off. And even when turned on had problems lacking onto targets.
    The Main gun couldn't be fired due to problem with hydraulics
    out of the 500 fire extinguishers on board there was 50, and they was locked up by the Admiral.
    So basically it was sailing (at half speed) into a warzone, blind, unable to defend themselves,

    • @timohelsing7372
      @timohelsing7372 Рік тому +1

      source?

    • @ryanthompson5761
      @ryanthompson5761 Рік тому

      @@timohelsing7372 Plenty online, Or you can watch Lazerpig moskva breakdown.

    • @espada_i_daga
      @espada_i_daga Рік тому

      Literally as a rest of ruzzian chmobics, blind and can't defend themselves in occupied territory

    • @henriqueferreira5165
      @henriqueferreira5165 Рік тому +1

      @@timohelsing7372 do your own research, but i do believe these claims way more than the Russian ones

    • @MissMan666
      @MissMan666 11 місяців тому +1

      Sounds the the average state of russian equipment.

  • @tretiakdev
    @tretiakdev Рік тому +50

    Glory to Ukraine 💙💛

  • @christianvik3400
    @christianvik3400 Рік тому +59

    Nice to know that Russias defence system are no better when German Matthias Rust landed his airplane at Red Sqare Moscow🤩.

  • @Pwn3dbyth3n00b
    @Pwn3dbyth3n00b Рік тому +114

    All of those counter measures and it got clapped easily by two missiles.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Рік тому +20

      The storm was the issue 🤔

    • @alexmason8557
      @alexmason8557 Рік тому +3

      @@Aitelly did the sailors survive?

    • @vojtakkojecky7765
      @vojtakkojecky7765 Рік тому

      yes they were evacuated later on by second ship@@alexmason8557

    • @voltaire229
      @voltaire229 Рік тому +10

      @@Aitelly In this case, bad captain. Should have retreated to safer spot if he knew radars cant work well in the storm.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Рік тому +15

      @@alexmason8557 yes all survived but one died

  • @STUDI0TK
    @STUDI0TK Рік тому +32

    There was no stormy weather that day. Moskva was just really badly maintained and basically no systems worked as intended. (For example only 1 of those automatic rotory guns worked).
    You can read this all in Moskvas maintenence report, that was made cuople of weeks before ukraine invasion.

  • @ggg-cf9zl
    @ggg-cf9zl Рік тому +35

    You've made some mistakes in the video. 8:13 Operational range of Neptune is actually up to 280 km and recent news that Neptune missiles were used to destroy Russian S-400 Triumph complexes in Crimea proves that. And speed isn't 300km/h but 900km/h.

    • @moshimoshi7785
      @moshimoshi7785 Рік тому +11

      It's worth noting that they say 300kph one minute, then 900 later in the video.
      The video also says 6 second engagement time on the AK's; but later they say 8 seconds.

    • @henriqueferreira5165
      @henriqueferreira5165 Рік тому

      with a speed of 900km/h and the AK's range of 1,6km. the moskva would have had 6 seconds reaction time with the AK's

  • @idiotic3925
    @idiotic3925 Рік тому +2

    Ohhhh goddddd ac 130 a biggest surprise thank you so much i desperately want that video thanks for that love from BHARAT 🇮🇳❤

  • @ridhobaihaqi144
    @ridhobaihaqi144 Рік тому +138

    Russia hyperfans gonna hate this, especially from indo. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Рік тому +51

      Its all about Engineering we are trying to be as Nuetral as Possible

    • @himanshugoswamii
      @himanshugoswamii Рік тому +9

      Not hyperfans dude it's just abt priorities for diff groups of people based on their past experiences.. indo.. people are only hyperfans of BHARAT (India ) .. 😊

    • @icemanzw
      @icemanzw Рік тому +1

      No one is going to hate this cause I war anything can happen unlike people like you who think otherwise

    • @spreddyreds9408
      @spreddyreds9408 Рік тому +7

      True, now go and help your PM beg for loan around the world.😂😂

    • @SenseiPandaa
      @SenseiPandaa Рік тому +2

      @@Aitelly then why don't you do this on russian kinzhal missile , ultra precise artillery system, eloctronic warfare systems ? Don't they have any kind of engineering theories?

  • @prashanthr1244
    @prashanthr1244 Рік тому +12

    Wow ...
    Wonderful engineering explaination

  • @jamesharris184
    @jamesharris184 Рік тому +22

    Well done. I had read elsewhere that the weather on the day of the missile strike wasn't too bad.

    • @smippycis6285
      @smippycis6285 Рік тому

      Lots of rampant misinformation during the war from both sides. Really gotta check sources now days.

    • @-oysterthief4444
      @-oysterthief4444 10 місяців тому

      There is a picture of it listing starboard the next morning

  • @clinton3098
    @clinton3098 Рік тому +1

    Thanks for your informative video. You also made a video, which I requested. Thanks for acknowledging my request. I am a student and I hope to make a bigger contribution next time.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Рік тому

      Thanks for your support financially.
      Your contribution helps us to produce better Video.

  • @mansoorulhassan515
    @mansoorulhassan515 Рік тому +7

    Its just strategized win all time

  • @user-ww4od4jl1f
    @user-ww4od4jl1f Рік тому +20

    *The Moscow cruiser had everything, the best synchronization, the best radar, missiles, one of which supposedly could have sunk a US aircraft carrier; and is now lying at the bottom of the sea. The best Russian technology.*

    • @rademare7286
      @rademare7286 Рік тому +1

      The ship could be that, but loss of good maintenance and modernization due to strong curruption in Russia (becouse what is know like 70% of ship equipment didnt work)+ crew mistakes lead to this outcome. But todays weapons are stronger than any most advanced ship no matter the nantion.

    • @user-ww4od4jl1f
      @user-ww4od4jl1f Рік тому +1

      @@rademare7286 *"todays weapons are stronger than any most advanced ship no matter the nantion." - what causes there are anti-missiles against missiles. As usual, the technologically superior country wins.*

    • @rademare7286
      @rademare7286 Рік тому

      @@user-ww4od4jl1f yes and I also said that 70% of equipment (SAMs, CIWS, damage control) was out of servise becouse of lack of maintenance due to corruption in Russia

    • @user-ww4od4jl1f
      @user-ww4od4jl1f Рік тому

      @@rademare7286 *That's exactly right.*

    • @uostap1
      @uostap1 Рік тому

      Friends, please do not belittle the merit of the intelligent Ukrainian military. It was the flagship of the Black Sea Fleet. And the Russian army is one of the strongest armies in the world.

  • @josephpacchetti5997
    @josephpacchetti5997 Рік тому +3

    Interesting Weapons & Systems, THX Ai Telly. 👊😎 🇺🇸

  • @lightsalt8279
    @lightsalt8279 Рік тому +6

    South East Asian here. Please make more informative video about naval warfare like this. Considering tension in South China Sea keep rising here.

    • @progman347
      @progman347 Рік тому

      So you think you can deter china military might using animation?

    • @lightsalt8279
      @lightsalt8279 Рік тому +1

      @@progman347 Don't worry, our country never lost any war. Even in cold war, we won against Communist, while US and allies lost in Vietnam and North Korea.
      But we might need more and more additional informations to reduce casualty as possible, if war will actually happen in 2027.

    • @lightsalt8279
      @lightsalt8279 Рік тому

      @@KingFreak-jd8qm They will invade Taiwan for sure. Xi Jinping already stated they must win the Taiwan by force or not in 2027. This statement is not a joke, and could be faster. And CIA director has confirmed this statement as warning and war prediction in 2027.
      About SEA, I'm not sure all SEA would join the fight. So far I only see Philippine and Indonesia, where Indonesian president said: "There's no negotiation for sovereignty".
      But Malaysian PM this week said: "we will continue to negotiate" 💀
      While Thailand still silence.
      Brunei is a passive country.
      Vietnam and Laos is still depending to China.
      And Junta Myanmar maybe be help China's supply.
      I can only add Singapore, they maybe calm but they are US allies (de-facto).

  • @jacoblahr
    @jacoblahr Рік тому +1

    Look at you... flexin on all of the youtube channels and what not. Keep doin yer thang playa

  • @gojoe47
    @gojoe47 6 місяців тому +1

    Kool video animation and explanation couldn't get better than that.

  • @JoeyBlogs007
    @JoeyBlogs007 Рік тому +8

    They could upgrade the Neptune just by adding some larger winglets to improve lift and range

  • @klimismistakidis1482
    @klimismistakidis1482 Рік тому +8

    Very impressive video and analysis. The Moskva although looks impressive is probably antiquated and no match for the Neptune missile.

  • @TundeEszlari
    @TundeEszlari Рік тому +7

    I love your videos, you are a very good UA-camr.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Рік тому +3

      Thanks we tried our best with this one.
      Next week another Video

    • @MaxPowerEditz
      @MaxPowerEditz Рік тому +2

      @@Aitelly Next video about HAL Prachand attack helicopter

    • @AAAAAAANKJJ
      @AAAAAAANKJJ Рік тому +1

      @@MaxPowerEditz Yah please make a video about HAL Prachand

  • @Sunscreen723
    @Sunscreen723 Рік тому +2

    animations are magnificent .Good job !

  • @FastMan10
    @FastMan10 Рік тому +14

    The minimum operational height of 25m isn't so accurate, since this ship was equipped with the newer version 5V55RM missile. It was useless either way.

    • @eemtech1606
      @eemtech1606 Рік тому

      What is the meaning of "is not so accurate" in your sentence?

    • @FastMan10
      @FastMan10 Рік тому +2

      @@eemtech1606 according to russian sources the minimum altitude to intercept an airborne target (aircraft or nsm) can vary between 10-25m in the latest variant (5V55RM) which is the one equipped in the moskva cruiser. Probably the ship was first spotted (geolocated) by a drone, then I can fire the missile without turning on the radar (knowing its position) so that the missile (neptune) can fly its first path using INS and the final stage active its own radar seeker to acquire the ship.

    • @lpdirv
      @lpdirv Рік тому +1

      Weather was calm, ship was not moving, ship systems were probably in shit shape. Believe there was a report about the state of repair of the ship systems and it wasn’t good. Now add in that russian training generally sucks and their leadership is terrible and you get the idea that the BSF is a joke. Still dangerous, like a monkey with a grenade or nuke.
      The Orcs almost shot down a Rivet Joint, let that sink in. The B2’s would have sunk every ship that the BSF still have in inventory. Its just crazy, russian crazy.

  • @bstange
    @bstange Рік тому +7

    R360 Neptune has a crusing speed of about 0.8 mach. Not 300km/h...

  • @БукерДеВитт-т3щ

    Дякую за випуск. Слава Україні. Дякую за увагу. Коментар в підтримку каналу

  • @artpost854
    @artpost854 Рік тому +2

    The combat range of Neptune missiles is 280 km with a 150 kg warhead against naval targets or 400 km with a 350 kg warhead against land targets. Flight speed 0.8 to 0.85 Mach. Idiologically, the missile is close to the X-35 and Harpoon, but differs from them in size and components.

  • @keithdrower9120
    @keithdrower9120 Рік тому +3

    Bravo. Great shot Ukraine......!

  • @EngineerAAJ
    @EngineerAAJ 11 місяців тому

    Man, your videos are just amazing.
    I hope UA-cam releases its dubbing AI for you soon so I can send to my friends that don't speak English.

  • @Onemancheeseburger
    @Onemancheeseburger Рік тому +4

    your videos are fire

  • @ausezpauser
    @ausezpauser 10 місяців тому

    Thanks you to @jpx1508, for doing the job you can't :
    UPDATES/OPTION 3: Moskva defensive systems were in poor repair and partially inoperative (per previous RF Navy audit of Moskva). Moskva sailors were conscripts distracted by an immediately-prior and ongoing attack by Byraktor drones. The conscripts miss-interpreted the incoming Neptune missiles as a part of the ongoing drone attack. 8 seconds later many of them were dead...

  • @MikusVilsons
    @MikusVilsons Рік тому +5

    Thank you for your very informative animations! Just a small adjustment - kilometres abbreviation is km, and not KMS 👍

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Рік тому +1

      Thanks for the info!

  • @ANUJYADAV-n8v
    @ANUJYADAV-n8v Рік тому +6

    Thanks for making So knowledgeable videos❤😂

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Рік тому +1

      Thanks to you 😁

  • @sebastiand152
    @sebastiand152 Рік тому +2

    How would a Neptun radar with 600 km range work? It seems not to be built high above the ground and the targeted ships are also not so elevated. At 600 km distance, they would be undetectable due to the curvature of the earth.
    Or do I miss anything?

    • @mikhaileskola3581
      @mikhaileskola3581 10 місяців тому

      На берегу за островом радары ,там расстояние 100 км..

  • @ic2e230
    @ic2e230 Рік тому +1

    Amazing video. I have commented on a recent video that it would be nice to see a neptune video and here it is❤.

  • @HMTOlympic5151
    @HMTOlympic5151 Рік тому +1

    Amazing Neptune missile video my friend ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @MaxPowerEditz
    @MaxPowerEditz Рік тому +2

    Please make a video about HAL Prachand attack helicopter

  • @RISHUS174
    @RISHUS174 Рік тому +8

    Очень интересно, спасибо за это пособие

    • @josssun
      @josssun Рік тому

      Jerk, this is open information 😂

  • @UnclePuzzled
    @UnclePuzzled Рік тому +6

    I wish your team inspiration! Your animations are always beautifully and clearly explained:)
    With regard to "Moscow", we can also add that they did not expect such audacity, otherwise they would not have come so close to the shore. It is the same story that the Russians underestimated Ukraine. By the way, an interesting fact: "Moscow" was built in Ukraine during the Soviet occupation :)

    • @No.Inkognito
      @No.Inkognito Рік тому +1

      The aftermath of the Soviet occupation of what? )) What are you talking about?

    • @UnclePuzzled
      @UnclePuzzled Рік тому +2

      @@No.Inkognito As a Russian, it must be unpleasant for you to hear such thoughts about your country. But you yourself understand that the Soviet Union was a violent structure - the occupation of "friendly republics." Therefore, in general, this is occupation in this case of Ukraine.

    • @No.Inkognito
      @No.Inkognito Рік тому +1

      @@UnclePuzzled Such words are not unpleasant to hear, but sad. In the West, they almost never tell details about the USSR. Ukraine could not have been occupied in any way if it had been part of Elina's country.😔 Pay attention. All parts of the Union were inside on the rights of republics and had some autonomy in decision-making. And this structure was laid down initially, unlike the united Russian Empire. Not only has Ukraine never been occupied, but, moreover, it was first separated from Russia in 1922 and, together with Belarus, formed the main core of the Soviet Union. ))
      And no, the Soviet Union was no more "cruel country" than all other democratic countries. And, most likely, a much freer country. Because it had a multi-level election system. All strata of society could be sure that their interests were represented by those whom they knew well and were confident in their decency. I could tell you a lot of details that you could confirm from Western sources. I was born and raised in the USSR.
      Today, among the remaining third of the former population of Ukraine, grandmothers are imprisoned for likes in Russian social networks.networks. (recently in Chernihiv) It is forbidden to treat Russians and Russia normally at the state level. And in school textbooks, 20 years ago they wrote that Russians are enemies and underdeveloped creatures. And no one (in the West) cares that this is not much different from "Nazism" and that Ukrainians were artificially made enemies for Russia. Literally every second Ukrainian has relatives in Russia. But it's hard for you to imagine such a monstrous farce...

    • @UnclePuzzled
      @UnclePuzzled Рік тому +1

      @@No.Inkognito On December 30, 1922, the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic concluded an agreement with the Ukrainian and Belarusian Soviet "Socialist Republics" on the formation of the Soviet Union. Before that, for many years (1918, for example), there were military operations against the forces of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic, which somehow ended up on the territory of Ukraine. Have you ever wondered what they were doing there?
      The entry of Ukrainian lands into the USSR was preceded by the establishment of communist authorities on this territory, which ruled the Holodomor in 1921-1923 (according to research, about half a million people died at that time!), which was not the result of drought alone, but was also a policy of "predistribution" , which exported an excessive amount of harvest from the territory of Ukraine.
      Why don't you mention the large-scale uprisings (due to dissatisfaction with the communist government) on the territory of Ukraine after 1922 and another famine of 1932-1933, which was also the policy of the "great" USSR (about 3 million people died in those years, and which was also not by chance, as the Russian side still writes).
      Regarding the second paragraph: either you are deliberately lying, or while living in the USSR you were still a child/did not notice what was happening around you.
      As I have already mentioned, famines and then repressions (for example, the Soviet political prisoner O. Solzhenitsyn gave the figures of 66 million repressed in the USSR (while Western historians write about 45-80 million), usually these were people "unpleasant" to the authorities, "spies", who were actually people who did their job poorly, for example, in the industry, and rebels who were against the Soviet government).
      Elections in the USSR were almost never transparent and usually the results were falsified in favor of certain candidates. The authorities were not interested in the lack of a large number of consumer goods, but weapons were produced in large quantities!
      The USSR was a totalitarian state, which cannot be "freer" than a democratic country, what are you talking about?!

    • @UnclePuzzled
      @UnclePuzzled Рік тому

      @@No.Inkognito First of all, the person from Chernigov, about whom you speak, worked as a "gunner" - for money he provided the "Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation" with military and civilian coordinates! objects, and then Russian missiles get there... This is called espionage for the benefit of the enemy. This is a common thing during any war on both sides of the conflict!
      Regarding your longer theses: Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014, killed civilians... During WW2 the British hated the Germans, they taught history in school explaining that Germany and its troops were to blame for starting the war. The German population mostly hated the British, and vice versa.
      Now Russia is conducting an information policy to convince the Western World that Ukrainians are Nazis.. However, I have not seen a single Nazi...! What are you talking about..
      Finally, at the end of the 10s, Ukrainian schools stopped teaching history with Russian narratives! This does not mean that the Russians are enemies! (though don't forget that more than 75% of Russians now support Russia's actions -- isn't that Nazism??!)
      The statement "that every second Ukrainian has relatives in Russia" is an audacious lie! There is indeed mixing in border areas, but these are only border areas.

  • @razvanciobotaru3089
    @razvanciobotaru3089 Рік тому +1

    Make a video about NASAMS System and one about IRIS-T, battery, launchers and etc.

  • @Sailingspeedat9kn
    @Sailingspeedat9kn Рік тому +2

    Could you please make a video on a artillery

  • @gansior4744
    @gansior4744 10 місяців тому +1

    Water was calm, with no waves. Missile didnt hide behind the waves, but just the radar wasn't working, as well as close range cannons. Basically, swimming wreck, so no wonder missiles got thru

  • @abirmahmud3809
    @abirmahmud3809 Рік тому +4

    Make A video on Chinese 055 Destroyer.....!!!

  • @dhannyhalim9892
    @dhannyhalim9892 Рік тому +1

    Ukraine,a country which their destroyer cant be destroy

  • @dr.fancyngandwe4129
    @dr.fancyngandwe4129 Рік тому +3

    No matter how advanced your counter systems are it all hinges down on how low can you limbo

  • @illiahapak501
    @illiahapak501 Рік тому +2

    To pros I'd add possibility to hit land targets (it hit S-400 Triumf recently).

  • @ericcheng3143
    @ericcheng3143 Рік тому +2

    Remember. A chain is as stronger as its weakest link. This battle cruise has a defensive weakness against low flying missile. If the Mokva had fully functional those vulcan type machine guns, they would have destroyed for sure one of the missile. None of them fired. Ukranians attacking with two missiles were correct! one is not enough. Best to attack this vessel with four instead of two to make sure.

  • @gino3286
    @gino3286 9 місяців тому

    Hi thank you for the very good video I have a trivial question
    I wonder if these highly advanced anti ship missiles are making warships of all kind obsolete
    Considering that a decent warship costs about half a billion what is the reason of spending such amount of money when a 5 millions missile can destroy it ? Am i missing something ?

  • @shoktroop
    @shoktroop Рік тому +1

    Well done!

  • @bandhanmondal4685
    @bandhanmondal4685 Рік тому

    I love this channel❤

  • @EzerReborn
    @EzerReborn Рік тому +2

    Ask Moskva. He knows better how it works 😂

  • @ASMM1981EGY
    @ASMM1981EGY Рік тому +1

    outstanding video

  • @2184u
    @2184u Рік тому +1

    Neptune was God of the sea in Kievan Rus. Neptune rocket is the best in the world.

  • @philipharris-smith5889
    @philipharris-smith5889 Рік тому

    So 2 out of 3 defence systems could not engage the Neptune. Both missiles hit, was the automated close defence offline or did Ukraine fire many missiles?

  • @dennyfpv1996
    @dennyfpv1996 Рік тому +2

    There are a lot of comments about how easily they were sunk, but in reality all the ships of both the USA and China are very easy to sink, because the reliability of all these protection systems is very low. Even if everything works well, two autocannons can be overloaded with the number of missiles.

  • @madanlalsharma1817
    @madanlalsharma1817 Рік тому

    Very very beautiful description I like it brilliant

  • @Galomortalbr
    @Galomortalbr Рік тому

    this video is so informative, thanks, i was tired of just hearing "Russian air defense doesn't work"

  • @Jakub1989YTb
    @Jakub1989YTb Рік тому +3

    From 5:19 you're showing the missile flying with the booster attached. Very big mistake and show's lack of "prrofreading". Fast content at all costs. I don't like that.

  • @MS-cr4hi
    @MS-cr4hi Рік тому

    Thank You!

  • @rashedulkabir6227
    @rashedulkabir6227 Рік тому +2

    Please make a video about Ukrainian cardboard drones and how those work.

  • @azertyazerty5347
    @azertyazerty5347 Рік тому

    Which program he is using in animation?

  • @Thewayofgrass35
    @Thewayofgrass35 Рік тому +7

    Hello

  • @tahasayed9341
    @tahasayed9341 Рік тому

    Name of the software used

  • @truthseeker3219
    @truthseeker3219 Рік тому +1

    Scenario number 3, the ship commander to much drinking vodka

  • @MohamedSalah-lb6ju
    @MohamedSalah-lb6ju Рік тому

    What about khinzal missles tell us how it took out patriot battery

    • @yaroslavbouchet
      @yaroslavbouchet Рік тому +2

      Who says that Кинжал took out a battery?

    • @timohelsing7372
      @timohelsing7372 Рік тому

      ​​@@yaroslavbouchetнаписано в похоронних повідомленнях матерям українських зенітників)

    • @xyesosso2869
      @xyesosso2869 Рік тому

      @@timohelsing7372Я написал от тебя похоронное письмо твоей матери,так что твоя мать сдохла инфа сотка

    • @xyesosso2869
      @xyesosso2869 Рік тому

      Ахахахахахахах

  • @yanreis5421
    @yanreis5421 Рік тому

    what is the source of data for the production of the video

  • @dominator3726
    @dominator3726 Рік тому

    inaccuracy is visible. "Osa" is not a vertical launch system. a launcher with two missiles extends from under the deck.

  • @Statueshop297
    @Statueshop297 2 місяці тому

    Only the S300 worked and 1 out of 8 AK CIWS guns at its last maintenance report. Not to mention the sensor issues and breakdowns that happened often.
    That ship never of been anywhere near a warzone.or even at sea.

  • @bo2web
    @bo2web 6 місяців тому

    1:29
    Think it's 0,8 Mach for the Neptune missile. > than 300 km/h

  • @alligatorpc
    @alligatorpc 14 днів тому

    It's highly unlikely for r360 to skim the water at a min flight height during stormy weather as the turbulent ground (combined with an assumed dense ew battlespace) would limit the performance of its own radar and could increase the interception envelope since the target sensors are higher than its flight profile.

  • @antonfilatov8140
    @antonfilatov8140 Рік тому

    Brilliant!

  • @JeromeIgnacio-d3h
    @JeromeIgnacio-d3h Рік тому

    Can't wait for the next content about the Angel of death gunship

  • @largol33t1
    @largol33t1 5 місяців тому

    It was clever how they programmed the missile to almost skim over the waves. Makes it extremely difficult for the CIWS on the Moskva to fire at a downwards angle to intercept it, if they worked at all...

  • @KelliEagle71
    @KelliEagle71 Рік тому +4

    Ukraine's underwater drones I can't wait to see them target the Russian navy targeting submarines as well as Russian frigate destroyers 👍
    Slava to Ukraine 🇺🇦

    • @begun65vdal5
      @begun65vdal5 Рік тому +1

      That could be difficult to attack a sub. I suggest that underwater drones like "Marichka" (thats the nice fat Ukrainian torpedo- like) are specially designed to attack Crimean bridge.

  • @roberthurley8366
    @roberthurley8366 4 місяці тому

    The weather was very calm on the day the ship was attacked, this is easily verified by pictures taken after the attack. There are known issues with the radar systems conflicting with each other and when the radars are used the communication systems cannot be used due to interference. Most of the close in weapon systems designed for point defense were not operational and had been scavenged for spare parts to keep the one operational unit operating even though it wasn't. The ship was a victim of poor maintenance and upkeep more than anything else because if it was maintained the attacking missiles would have been shot down. Condolences to the families of those lost and prayers that the lessons are learned from this incident and applied

  • @ДмитрийЧ-з3я
    @ДмитрийЧ-з3я Рік тому +1

    The Neptune missile is based on the Soviet X35, which is a clone of the American Harpoon. х35 has been completely redesigned (only the body and the layout diagram remain)
    The missile is equipped with a guidance system that captures a target at a distance of up to 50 km, resistant to radio-electronic warfare. Also at the time of the presentation, the developers claimed that these missiles can attack in a group. When attacking a group, missiles exchange information, independently choose a priority target, its hitting points(the system is able to determine the profile of the target), or distribute targets among themselves. At the moment, I found mention of such possibilities only in old Russian publications

  • @AdmiringOceanSunset-sy7ys
    @AdmiringOceanSunset-sy7ys 8 місяців тому

    Nice missile (rocket) but is it hypersonic??? Roa Aotearoa nui.

  • @cgmax7
    @cgmax7 Рік тому

    Please make a video on V-280 which is the Next-Generation Aircraft

  • @backpackingtony1779
    @backpackingtony1779 Рік тому

    Commenting to support the algorithm. 😂

  • @vasylmelnyk1362
    @vasylmelnyk1362 Рік тому +4

    Speed 900 km/h not 300 kn/h.

  • @shreyascprabhu90
    @shreyascprabhu90 Рік тому

    Make a video on mantis air defence system

  • @GG-gj3bp
    @GG-gj3bp 3 місяці тому

    Scenario 3 : U must have a lucky day 🤞

  • @tsb28
    @tsb28 Рік тому

    Make a video on the kornet anti tank missile

  • @Ozbird-72
    @Ozbird-72 Рік тому

    Why not take Kerch bridge down with those?

  • @kinai01
    @kinai01 6 місяців тому

    I think there's another Factor the does not get talked about a lot. Those that have ever served on a Russian naval vessel or have ever been on it. Will see that the displays and screens are very old. I don't really believe that it was a drone the distracted the crew theory. However I think operator fatigue is more likely. On a Russian naval vessel especially the Slava class, humans interpreting data and responding quickly in an appropriate time is the way these ships work there is no automated system. Considering that the ship was out at sea for several weeks at that time. I think it's more likely that the crew was fatigued and couldn't recognize the targets in time.

  • @patjr35234
    @patjr35234 Рік тому

    What happened with patria video? amazing video yeet again

  • @JustinTurnerman
    @JustinTurnerman 4 місяці тому

    Big paper tiger. Anyone can say anything. Actions speak louder than words.

  • @ANUJYADAV-n8v
    @ANUJYADAV-n8v Рік тому +3

    Wait for Ac 130 video 😅

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Рік тому

      Next week Friday/Saturday

  • @johnm8693
    @johnm8693 Рік тому +3

    I have really enjoyed your content for a long time. Unfortunately UA-cam's decision to demonetize Russel Brand over what are - at this point - mere allegations forces me to unsubscribe from every channel on UA-cam. I wish you the best of luck and thank you for the content.

    • @jaxonl7810
      @jaxonl7810 Рік тому +4

      .....that doesn't make any fucken sense

    • @buryitdeep
      @buryitdeep Рік тому

      I had the same thought. Once Rumble gets better I'm gone.

  • @chrisweber7460
    @chrisweber7460 8 місяців тому

    There was no stormy or bad wether conditions day when die Moskva was sunk! The s300 was disabled because the system interfered with the communication system. From 6 short defense guns was only one ready to work, the other 5 were used as spart parts for the one system. There exist a Russian navy report which was made two weeks before the invasion of the Ukraine.

  • @weecious
    @weecious 7 днів тому

    Neptune's speed isn't 300km/h.. it's 900km/h and at the biginning of war Neptune's range wasn't 200km.. it was 280km. Right now Neptune's range has been extended to 400km and it's been modified to hit ground targets as well. Ukrainians are working on extending its range even further to 1000km.

  • @visoroverwatch3247
    @visoroverwatch3247 Рік тому +4

    US Navy should be looking into this so they can learn from Moskva's Shortcomings.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Рік тому +3

      yes everone i heard is analysing this stategy during Stormy Weather

    • @muhacnt7988
      @muhacnt7988 Рік тому

      Who do you think is supervising the overall war over there if not nato generals and instructors

  • @EmarElutin
    @EmarElutin 2 місяці тому

    Ask the crew of Moskva how Neptune works.🤣🤣🤣

  • @KKRioApartments
    @KKRioApartments Рік тому +1

    Neptune's speed isn't 300km like the vid says - that'd be ridiculously super slow for a missile.
    I think whoever did your research confused the Neptune's *range*, which is actually 300km, with its speed.

    • @NilsMueller
      @NilsMueller Рік тому +4

      Yeah I thought that too. Later in the video they do say 900km/h.
      Must be a mistake

  • @Highendaudio1
    @Highendaudio1 9 місяців тому

    Wow. It's grown arms and legs. The belief that this missile is real astounds me, and there is no missile strike on this ship. The Neptune missile has existed for a while, but it has the S 4000 rocket motor and a range of 40 miles. The R-350 was a wood-beam design, but it has no motors because it comes from China. The development was intended to be part of a deal with the US to develop the weapon. That is why there is one video on the internet from a long time ago. if there are more, let me see them. The radar from this unit cannot detect the ship at 190 yards away, and at 190 miles away, this weapon would miss a moving target unless it received mid-flight updates. It is not a technology they claim to have protected and certainty no one else has.

  • @БакулинАлексей-т9г

    There was a public report on the attack of this flagship. Indeed there was a storm and the waves on the radar prevented us from seeing the missile. Bayraktar was also in the air and distracted the cruiser from the attack. Perhaps the ship was hunting the drone. But the report doesn’t say if he destroyed the ship’s radar or not.

    • @Coughinggonzalo
      @Coughinggonzalo Рік тому +2

      Regardless, a beautiful day for Ulraine and us all.

    • @sH-ed5yf
      @sH-ed5yf Рік тому +2

      When we saw pictures of the ship shortly after it was hit, the sea was calm.
      Waether networks confirm there was no storm.