The Kalam, Molinism, and Personal Questions | Reasonable Faith Podcast
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
- Dr. Craig answers questions on the Kalam Argument, Molinism, the Atonement, and some personal questions about his current life and work.
For more resources visit: www.reasonable...
We welcome your comments in the Reasonable Faith forums:
www.reasonable...
Be sure to also visit Reasonable Faith's other channel which contains short clips: / drcraigvideos
Follow Reasonable Faith On Twitter: / rfupdates
Like the Reasonable Faith Facebook Fan Page: / reasonablefaithorg
Craig's Assessing the New Testament Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus is so underappreciated, I have the paperback! I think I want the new one too!
Im so ready for this systematic theology
Looking forward to your new Systematic Theology book Dr Craig!! God bless you!!!
I hope you keep making content for a long time Dr. Craig
Wow I can see Craig's Systematic Theology easily being 14 volumes long haha. Can't wait!
I'm expecting a 5 volume set, much like Geisler
@@th3ist nah, if he is already on Vol 3 and just now on Creation, we have a long way to go
Peter, Paul, Jesus, etc. used this aggressive tactic against PROFESSING followers of God, not against unbelievers.
Paul used logic, debate, and calm persuasion to reach unbelievers. Jesus used love, his example, and the authority of his speech.
I really like you Dr Craig, but you seriously give some nonsense advice here.
I had someone explain to me that pedophilia is just a sexual orientation and your concern is "be nice or we'll look bad."
We're facing absolute evil, being nice and tolerant has put our back to the cliff. You're a smart guy, but this advice will result in nothing but our conclusion.
Hope to see Dr Craig on Joe Rogan one day
Hi Dr. Craig. I saw you personally speak at Clemson University a couple years ago and absolutely loved it and have been reading your material for many years. I’ve recently been in a polite debate with a Jewish man, who absolutely refuses to accept any New Testament scholarship, and constantly tells me that Jesus was a man who strictly followed the Torah, and that we need no intercessor whatsoever. Is there any particular material or video that you would recommend I share with this man? Thank you for your time.
ua-cam.com/video/hL-zJzE5clA/v-deo.htmlsi=tTUclCkIO_98UvAP
- RF Admin
Thank you Dr. Craig for answering my question. 8:32
Stoked for that Philosophical Systematic Theology
Very much enjoye Dr. Craig's videos. However, the kalam argument doesn't seem wholly a strong evidence for God. Also, the argument that something cannot come from nothing still lacks something to make it 100% immune to doubt. Perhaps, someone more enlightened can provide logical evidences ?
"However, the kalam argument doesn't seem wholly a strong evidence for God" - what do you think it is lacking?
"Also, the argument that something cannot come from nothing still lacks something to make it 100% immune to doubt. " - The premises of an argument don't need to be 100% probable, that sets the bar way too high and would result in us rejecting pretty much every argument for anything.
The premises in an argument only need to be more plausibly true than false (>50% probable) for them to be accepted as true.
Does Dr. Craig plan to add to his fine tuning argument in his first premise the option of the simulation hypothesis? More and more physicists adhere to this position to explain the fine-tuning of the universe.
If by "simulation hypothesis" you mean the idea that the Universe is a simulation then that is already included in the first premise. That would fall under the "design" explanation.
@@jackplumbridge2704 Correct. What would be at stake now would be the probability of a designer vs simulated universe in the absence of arguments.
@@KudaIzka Well the burden would be on the defender of the simulation hypothesis to show that the universe is a simulation. In the absence of any good reasons to think we live in a simulation we should not believe that we do, we should believe that what we experience is real, a real physical universe. So unless the defender of the simulation hypothesis can present any credible evidence that we live in a simulation the "God hypothesis" comes out on top by default.