Every time I see him fight or play hunter I just keep thinking back to him and others going "POOF HUNTER IS GONE BECAUSE OF THIS ONE CARD!" Hiiiilarious
If you mean pre UTH nerf, there was no way they could've predicted what type of cards they bring in the Naxxramas release so they weren't wrong. Back then Hunter was based mostly on the UTH combo. And I personally haven't heard anyone say that Hunter will die, because of the Buzzard nerf.
It actually makes me feel pretty good because it means that streamers can't dictate what the meta is. Hunter didn't stop being viable just because Trump declared it dead when buzzard was nerfed.
It's funny, because I have a similar, but much more aggressive deck. I'm sure I'm not the only one to have the idea. But, I was running it back right out of Naxxramas so I'm curious if I'm the first. A lot of the abnormal cards like Nourish I recognized from my own deck list. However, I would say this is more of a hybrid between what I call Deathdruid (Because you need a lot of Deathrattle) and your typical druid. My Deathdruid list has a lot less class minions in it because they just aren't durable enough for the main point of the deck. Either way, it's funny seeing parts of your own deck at a higher level. Though, despite the higher ranking I do feel his deck list needs improving since I like the more durable version I devolved.
aww, that poor paladin. Had chow nicely traded to knife jug, had all the board clear used and healed for 12. after all that still lose to hunter. ( mainly because he does not have board control tho. but still.. poor paladin.)
FYI Does trump know that hovering over the secret above his portrait shows what it is? Because he never did it and was saying he was "hoping" it was certain traps. Just saying could influence plays if he did know!!!
i have a question about unleash the hounds and shield slam when u have no armor/ur opponent has nothing on the board, the cards are outlined in green, as if u can use them, but what happens? Please answer
Palkdhk Hfgwiaukl Well it's sometimes usefull. You can activate a Pyro with that, Violet Teacher, Auctioneer, that kind of stuff. And i think you can still deal damages if you have some spell power minions but not sure.
Does Trump not know you can hover your secret to see what it is or does he just not care? For example when he said "I hope it's snake trap" after the Mad Scientist died, he could have just checked.
If I'm thinking of the same part you are, he was able to tell what trap it was because he had a secret in hand. If the secret in hand was still playable, it meant that it was a different secret. If it was the same secret, then the secret in hand would be unplayable and not have the blue border around it.
I think in situations like this where knowing which trap it is does not affect his decision making, he purposely avoids checking the trap because he doesn't want to give any info to the opponent about his deck. (The opponent might notice you checking the trap and make the conclusion that you run more than one type of trap in your deck)
I just figured that in situations where it doesn't matter what his secret is, he prefers to keep it a surprise for himself. However, I could see Trump not hovering over it for something as small as they'd see him hovering over the trap.
druid at 10:20 ish could have won, he missplayed he swiped the silverback and used all three minions to attack the face if he ahd swiped the face and used one of his 3damage minions to finnish the silverback he would have done 1 more damage to the face and that would have been lethal
Swiping on the face would still be 1 damage off. Cause Trump was at 15, swipe would leave him at 11, and using 3 on the silverback, would leave just 10 damage on the board including hero power.
4(Swipe)+4(Golem)+3(Ooze)+3(Face) still equals 14, either result he was 1 damage off lethal. In that case, hitting the Silverback with a minion would've been the worse play because the snakes from snake trap would trigger Knife Juggler which had a chance of killing 1 of the Oozes, if not 2 if RNG goes exactly the Hunter's way with the 3 knives.
No space. I play a similar deck and it's tuned up pretty tightly. There's a lot of variation but this version is damn good. If I were to replace anything, I would MAYBE replace Loatheb
Trump knows that he can hover over his own secret to see what it is, right? At one point he was like "hm, I hope it's freezing". Hm, well played anyway!
Stop lying to your self, Hearthstone has evolved and is now sentient. Even more crazy than that, it can now read minds. You people need to face the facts.
From watching Trump, it seems that if they nerfed Hunters damage output just a little bit it would make it more interesting as it's then riskier going for face... maybe, I dunno. Even when I played WoW I always hated Hunters, I was a Tank and they freaking run rings round me every time, made worse by my troll of an older brother playing one and having a pet that could insta-heal every few seconds, such bollox.
It kinda depends on the meta and the deck composition you're running, I think. Having Explosive Trap without Hunter's Mark vs. control is probably as bad as Snake Trap without taunts and/or Knife Juggler vs. aggro, and there's not much reason to run Hunter's Mark right now. Haven't seen a handlock in a while at Rank 3. It's also probably the easiest trap to play around, since you can still trade and keep the board clear without triggering it by hitting face.
why are ppl hating on hunter so much? they still require some skill to use since u need to think when to clear and when to face cause u need to max ur dmg since its either u fin them off fast or lose. also its not a "pay2win" deck that u guys always pretend to hate so at least be happy for that, gosh ppl are never happy ps i dont hate decks that use legendaries either
hunter is kind of a sucky class. i mean if you play hunter its basically indicated that you go rank 5 or higher, but you don't really do anything to get that high. i'm ashamed when i win with hunter because i don't deserve it, but with other classes like priest or paladin it's really hard to get to high ranks because of all these huntards everywhere :/ IT'S SO DIFFICULT !
He's not at first but he gets at least a little better as he plays more games. It's just because it is completely the opposite of his normal playstyle. I give him credit for going for it tho as playing outside of comfort control classes is how one evolves as a player. It does kinda suck to watch tho.
OMG THIS IS SO BORING! Srsly, this is like the most boring type of play I've ever seen, this is why I hate aggro decks! At least zoo has some strategy, here you just rush down like a bull...
Huck Funters, every time you play one a Pint Sized Summoner dies.
She's my wife.
I do. She's my arena love guru.
AlexmaxPL Coin Pint Sized into innervate Druid of the Claw. GG
That's adorable
Or into the Beast.
Как приятно проводить свободное время на работе, за просмотром видосиков Трампа:)
Thanks for the interesting video Trump! As always.
Every time I see him fight or play hunter I just keep thinking back to him and others going "POOF HUNTER IS GONE BECAUSE OF THIS ONE CARD!"
Hiiiilarious
If you mean pre UTH nerf, there was no way they could've predicted what type of cards they bring in the Naxxramas release so they weren't wrong. Back then Hunter was based mostly on the UTH combo. And I personally haven't heard anyone say that Hunter will die, because of the Buzzard nerf.
Yeah all the youtubers said the same thing, hunters were dead that was it. lol nope they were all wrong.
Benkkuful The buzzard nerf.
Benkkuful Trump said so himself that Hunter would die from the Buzzard nerf.
It actually makes me feel pretty good because it means that streamers can't dictate what the meta is. Hunter didn't stop being viable just because Trump declared it dead when buzzard was nerfed.
That druid deck was friggin awesome :D.
Soon, everyone will hate it because it got promoted by trump. So people will start copying this.
*****
Wtf seriously? Thats awesome.
It's funny, because I have a similar, but much more aggressive deck. I'm sure I'm not the only one to have the idea. But, I was running it back right out of Naxxramas so I'm curious if I'm the first. A lot of the abnormal cards like Nourish I recognized from my own deck list. However, I would say this is more of a hybrid between what I call Deathdruid (Because you need a lot of Deathrattle) and your typical druid. My Deathdruid list has a lot less class minions in it because they just aren't durable enough for the main point of the deck. Either way, it's funny seeing parts of your own deck at a higher level. Though, despite the higher ranking I do feel his deck list needs improving since I like the more durable version I devolved.
Trump's as edgy as a circle.
In the second druid game I was expecting a moonfire for finish trump off.
I play Hunter in WoW (and Warrior), but I feel ashamed that Hunters are so derp. THIS is the true Huntard.
"Ashkandi is a Hunter Weapon" Hunters will always be the true Huntards.
Gogito4 They aren't as bad as the Roguecraft days of retardation. Two buttons to win the game.
PitFighter Vanilla Fire Mages.
Pop all cooldowns. Hit Fireball. One shot everything until the cooldowns are down.
Skill.
benilh1 Tumblr alert!
I've never even been on Tumblr. Yeah... I'm a strange person.
aww, that poor paladin.
Had chow nicely traded to knife jug, had all the board clear used and healed for 12. after all that still lose to hunter.
( mainly because he does not have board control tho. but still.. poor paladin.)
Sick Mad Science effect, Jens.
Soul of the forest? Man this guy is my hero!
10:15 if the swipe was to the face he had lethal... well played :P
PS: snakes would be a problem tho but it was a play to win
Paladeins might become insane with GvG. That Watcher + Coghammer synergy.
Huck Funters, I loose cromossomes each time i see someone playing with them.
Cromossomes.. ? Yeah, you did lose plenty of chromosomes, downie.
Seems like you've lost way too many already.
I know right? Imagine what it'd be like to lose actual chromosomes!
OMG GRAMMAR NAZIS PLZ HELP SomoChromes
SilvaaFabio This is not a grammar rule, this is just spelling.
Anyone know what version of the token druid that is or was it a unique set-up? I'm trying to re-make it just not sure about the numbers of some cards!
"Оу!Это новый класс!" Трамп о паладине на четвёртом ранге)
I wan't that druid's decklist. Gonna try something similar.
FYI Does trump know that hovering over the secret above his portrait shows what it is? Because he never did it and was saying he was "hoping" it was certain traps. Just saying could influence plays if he did know!!!
That aggro druid is the kind I use. I made it from scratch before this.
i have a question about
unleash the hounds
and
shield slam
when u have no armor/ur opponent has nothing on the board, the cards are outlined in green, as if u can use them, but what happens?
Please answer
well u can use it on your own minions but u dont do any dmg
It does 0 damage(slam) or summons nothing (hounds), basically, it is a waste of mana.
Palkdhk Hfgwiaukl Well it's sometimes usefull. You can activate a Pyro with that, Violet Teacher, Auctioneer, that kind of stuff.
And i think you can still deal damages if you have some spell power minions but not sure.
They wont do any thing but they will count as a spell so they will trigger Pyro/Auctioneer
Hunter and Warrior dont run those things
really fun seeing something that edgy at rank 2
Awesome keep up with the good work
He misplayed when he went face with the undertaker in the first match
The title of this video reminded me of Prince Kael'thas from Warcraft 3 Frozen Throne. "I feel edgy."
Does Trump not know you can hover your secret to see what it is or does he just not care?
For example when he said "I hope it's snake trap" after the Mad Scientist died, he could have just checked.
If I'm thinking of the same part you are, he was able to tell what trap it was because he had a secret in hand. If the secret in hand was still playable, it meant that it was a different secret. If it was the same secret, then the secret in hand would be unplayable and not have the blue border around it.
I think in situations like this where knowing which trap it is does not affect his decision making, he purposely avoids checking the trap because he doesn't want to give any info to the opponent about his deck. (The opponent might notice you checking the trap and make the conclusion that you run more than one type of trap in your deck)
Santeri Kuusisto Does it even show you hover over your own secret? I have never seen that.
LordTails66 Yeah, if you hover over your own secret for a couple of seconds.
I just figured that in situations where it doesn't matter what his secret is, he prefers to keep it a surprise for himself. However, I could see Trump not hovering over it for something as small as they'd see him hovering over the trap.
That Druid Deck he played against was wierd.
Ah hunter, the cancer of hearthstone, nice games tho
edgy
At this point id say fuck the whole gasme.
druid at 10:20 ish could have won, he missplayed
he swiped the silverback and used all three minions to attack the face
if he ahd swiped the face and used one of his 3damage minions to finnish the silverback he would have done 1 more damage to the face and that would have been lethal
It is the same outcome
False, because swipe did 1 damage to face
Swiping on the face would still be 1 damage off.
Cause Trump was at 15, swipe would leave him at 11, and using 3 on the silverback, would leave just 10 damage on the board including hero power.
It would've spawned snakes and possibly killed his creeps anyway, besides the fact the same is the same.
4(Swipe)+4(Golem)+3(Ooze)+3(Face) still equals 14, either result he was 1 damage off lethal. In that case, hitting the Silverback with a minion would've been the worse play because the snakes from snake trap would trigger Knife Juggler which had a chance of killing 1 of the Oozes, if not 2 if RNG goes exactly the Hunter's way with the 3 knives.
Consider putting in a shade of naxramas? If not aoed down the can get extremely powerdul
No space. I play a similar deck and it's tuned up pretty tightly. There's a lot of variation but this version is damn good. If I were to replace anything, I would MAYBE replace Loatheb
no, no,no, a thousand no's. its way too slow
If opponents doesn't get aoes he'll probably die anyway.
poweeeerduuuul
Too slow, hunters don't have savage roar, it's not gonna be too good.
Trump knows that he can hover over his own secret to see what it is, right? At one point he was like "hm, I hope it's freezing". Hm, well played anyway!
What is his streaming schedule??
Why do people hate hunters so much, it's part of the game. If you want to win that bad just play handlock or antique healbots.
I still don't see the purpose of the 2x Snake Trap in his deck tbh. This whole playthrough he has not once gained anything from it iirc
This is absolutely vile to watch. Am disliking and clicking away just after watching that first disgusting victory.
2 new released cards! A weapon and something else
I vomited in my mouth. Disgusting.
has anyone else noticed than whenever you play animal companion after the big hunter nerf, i get the exact opposite of what i need
It's called RNG.
Its not, its rigged
Stop lying to yourself s
Connor Ryan The game can't read your mind and tell what outcome you want.
Stop lying to your self, Hearthstone has evolved and is now sentient. Even more crazy than that, it can now read minds. You people need to face the facts.
Connor Ryan Fuck you
The Druid just looked like a token type with nourish and soul of the forest thrown in. Still interesting though.
It' called ebola Druid on Hearthpwn.
EyeronOre No, ebola Druid is a different deck.
If only they allowed you to bring 4-5 different hunter decks to the tournaments.
From watching Trump, it seems that if they nerfed Hunters damage output just a little bit it would make it more interesting as it's then riskier going for face... maybe, I dunno. Even when I played WoW I always hated Hunters, I was a Tank and they freaking run rings round me every time, made worse by my troll of an older brother playing one and having a pet that could insta-heal every few seconds, such bollox.
On my personal experience playing against hunters I'd say there's about a 60 % chance to get a huffer from animal companion. U WOT M8!?
Why is explosive trap bad?
It kinda depends on the meta and the deck composition you're running, I think. Having Explosive Trap without Hunter's Mark vs. control is probably as bad as Snake Trap without taunts and/or Knife Juggler vs. aggro, and there's not much reason to run Hunter's Mark right now. Haven't seen a handlock in a while at Rank 3.
It's also probably the easiest trap to play around, since you can still trade and keep the board clear without triggering it by hitting face.
Razorfen Hunter or Harvest Golem??
Harvest
You are basically asking 2/3+1/1 OR 2/3+2/1.
Dexter Du Yeah.... Didn't think of that.....
what happend to your audio?
Is it odd that I watch trump while waiting for a battle on hearthstone?
No, i usually watch Trump while playing Hearthstone
EpicShroomie At least I'm not the only one :D
"play hunter requires lots of skill" trump 2014
Pls rewiev the goblins vs gnomes cards!
Two of that weird druid deck? Seems like a netdeck.
He played the same druid twice.
It was the same guy.
How could you 9:00 ??? Play something else than the 8 decks...every...single...Hearthstone player is playing? ..............I bow to you ScarWolf!
why are ppl hating on hunter so much? they still require some skill to use since u need to think when to clear and when to face cause u need to max ur dmg since its either u fin them off fast or lose. also its not a "pay2win" deck that u guys always pretend to hate so at least be happy for that, gosh ppl are never happy
ps i dont hate decks that use legendaries either
haters gona hate
what they hate doesn't matter and changes rapidly don't even bother questioning it cuz its a waste of time
Said the hunter user
Kayden Loos no i dont play hunter, i find it boring. i main shaman mainly but i play a lot of other stuff too like warrior and druid
Like for Trump
Comment for Amaz
Second game, the Druid could have won, if he would have swiped trumps face instead, and kill the patriarch with a ooze
27:04 Oh my god, that play is so awful
Trump please free to play hunter series
With the exception of loatheb and snake traps the deck is pretty much f2p already.
hunter is kind of a sucky class. i mean if you play hunter its basically indicated that you go rank 5 or higher, but you don't really do anything to get that high. i'm ashamed when i win with hunter because i don't deserve it, but with other classes like priest or paladin it's really hard to get to high ranks because of all these huntards everywhere :/ IT'S SO DIFFICULT !
that druid's deck is ebola druid
imastprotectdawild
Am I the only one who thinks Trump isn't very good at shithunter?
Agree with you specially vs the paladin when everyone knows equality is a bitch yet he keeps his 1/1 to hit his face with his 1 attack minions.....
Yeah he is too control focussed - he doesnt go for face
He's not at first but he gets at least a little better as he plays more games. It's just because it is completely the opposite of his normal playstyle. I give him credit for going for it tho as playing outside of comfort control classes is how one evolves as a player. It does kinda suck to watch tho.
hunters doing hunter things
Hi mom
I....must....not....press....like....ahhhh, i failed. Im switching to the dark side god save my soul D: .
grumble grumble..
Trump playing Hunter is surprisingly unfun to watch, and Trump isn't the one to blame here.
You're smart as fuck.
Seems legit
You monsters. There are hunterless decks in africa
nie
i hate hunter, every time i see u play thhis deck , i want u to lose
omg 1
3 veews
LOOL
OMG THIS IS SO BORING! Srsly, this is like the most boring type of play I've ever seen, this is why I hate aggro decks! At least zoo has some strategy, here you just rush down like a bull...
First
LOL!Dat was not even close one guy was 5 min before u here!