MVRDV replaces Chanel store's traditional facade with glass bricks

Поділитися
Вставка

КОМЕНТАРІ • 31

  • @heroired3973
    @heroired3973 2 роки тому +1

    The final result is amazing!

  • @ralevdotcom
    @ralevdotcom 8 років тому +7

    Great idea and realisation! Looks stunning.

  • @mohammedsaleh5990
    @mohammedsaleh5990 4 роки тому +2

    Wooow.
    It's amazing

  • @ImNotPotus
    @ImNotPotus 8 років тому +10

    A pigeons wet dream!!!!!

  • @garycurtis7674
    @garycurtis7674 3 роки тому

    Thats revolving.

  • @Evphil
    @Evphil 8 років тому +2

    Details for the background music please?

    • @GuapLord5000
      @GuapLord5000 4 роки тому +7

      It's. Been. 3. Years. GIVE PHIL HIS DETAILS!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @ccprophets
      @ccprophets Місяць тому

      @@GuapLord5000 he looks old, its 8 years later.. hes probably dead.. i wonder if he ever found out ?

  • @sureshchatriya1848
    @sureshchatriya1848 Рік тому

    Are glass bricks stronger than concrete ones ❓I think powerful telescope lenses are made of glass through which we could explore our universe. Bullet proofs for cars are glass. We can't spend a day without looking a mirror atleast once. ❤❤❤

  • @sammyflorczak8800
    @sammyflorczak8800 4 роки тому +14

    So they destroyed an old building and replaced it with a modern clone?

    • @paulsehstedt6275
      @paulsehstedt6275 2 роки тому +5

      Yes, that's the way to incorporate modern architecture into boring old city centres. Many old buildings in AMS aren't worth to preserve or too expensive to restore.

    • @r.a.h7682
      @r.a.h7682 2 роки тому

      @@paulsehstedt6275 boring? so ironic because modern architecture lags any details making it very boring.

    • @paulsehstedt6275
      @paulsehstedt6275 2 роки тому

      @@r.a.h7682 yes, too much of a nice thing can become boring, too.

  • @ivpt
    @ivpt 3 роки тому +2

    So they just demolished a historic building?

    • @ccprophets
      @ccprophets Місяць тому

      feel free to go back to a hut

  • @Chavezoid
    @Chavezoid 7 років тому +10

    Nice... but....did they destroy a historic house to do that?

    • @Zoza15
      @Zoza15 7 років тому +4

      If that´s what your worried about then dont be surprised if you one day visit the Netherlands that most of the architecture here becomes rather modernized and improved..
      The Netherlands in the last years have been modernizing in its own fashion by colorful compact houses with different unique shapes..
      Because most of these older buildings simply wears out too and have to be demolished for new houses with the basic shapes of the older designs but improved and innovated..

    • @goatontheroad7692
      @goatontheroad7692 5 років тому +6

      I mean, compared to the simplicity of brutralism and cubism in architecture today, this actually looks and feels nicer

    • @RokuRG
      @RokuRG 4 роки тому +1

      Nova Verse Thats just not true... Most historical buildings are protected and can only be restored in a specific way. Unfortunately, sometimes people make shitty decisions and they let companies destroy perfectly good building, like in this video. But thats not a norm

    • @richardprice5978
      @richardprice5978 2 роки тому

      @@RokuRG still like the glass facade ideas, wonder if 1840-80's victorians with a big pocketbook would have done something like this in the period or not? aka historically correct? love pre-1920 architecture for the most part and if i get the chance im buying one and or cloning it with 2022 technology/convenience's

    • @richardprice5978
      @richardprice5978 2 роки тому

      @@RokuRG i know that in 1500-1800 uk 🇬🇧 or anywhere else besides maybe Venice Italy 🇮🇹 glass was $$$ and or impossible to buy and the knowledge was kept to the king's men/government so Venice or maybe middle eastern country's were the only known manufacturer's of glass but by 1890-ish most 1st world countries made glass and cheap enough to buy for every-man housing and by 1970's some houses had windows for every wall plus the roof.
      the 1500-expense is why i don't think it was used as a building materials but by 1790-up maybe? as it got cheap and easy to get

  • @RokuRG
    @RokuRG 4 роки тому +7

    Yay, you just destroyed a historical building and replaced it with something that wont last 30 year.

    • @keethkeith1989
      @keethkeith1989 4 роки тому +5

      you have no idea how long glass lasts

  • @cherrycoke8658
    @cherrycoke8658 4 роки тому

    shame

  • @wintertyme
    @wintertyme 6 років тому +4

    Very dramatic and dumb at the same time.