Debunking the OM = mc² Myth Once and For All

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @TheWorldOfScienceHindi
    @TheWorldOfScienceHindi 3 дні тому +108

    Beautifully explained! 👌 These pseudoscientific claims and people peddling them must be called out!

    • @shivanshc01
      @shivanshc01 3 дні тому +9

      @@TheWorldOfScienceHindi आपका youtube channel भी बहुत अच्छा है। आप भी भारतीय समाज में scientific temperament को बढ़ा रहे हैं। 🙏🙏♥️♥️

    • @DhruvChaudhary-of4qr
      @DhruvChaudhary-of4qr 3 дні тому +2

      amazing and feel good to see UA-cam channels like you and Kshitij and others (bio shala, logical aayam ...)

    • @Gaurav-dv7sr
      @Gaurav-dv7sr 3 дні тому +3

      Another science loving channel ❤

    • @thelogicless9040
      @thelogicless9040 3 дні тому

      @@TheWorldOfScienceHindi maine indono ka channel pichle 3 din mai subscribe kia h youtube ne recommend Kiya tha

    • @astrokshitij3478
      @astrokshitij3478  3 дні тому +6

      Thanks a lot, also love your work

  • @rajdeeppatel9151
    @rajdeeppatel9151 3 дні тому +144

    Wait till F=ma-bhavani

  • @anilkumardash_123
    @anilkumardash_123 3 дні тому +76

    For Andhbhakts - Science एक कल्पना मात्र

    • @samnetam8177
      @samnetam8177 3 дні тому +1

      😂

    • @studywithrahul3764
      @studywithrahul3764 3 дні тому

      और सुधांशु त्रिवेदी के लिए साइंस मेरा नाना मात्र😂

  • @artisharma....
    @artisharma.... 3 дні тому +67

    Om=mc²❌
    Hyper quest=(MC)²✅

    • @Raj-ox2kx
      @Raj-ox2kx 3 дні тому +7

      Bro bas MC bolo

    • @artisharma....
      @artisharma.... 3 дні тому +5

      ​@@Raj-ox2kxNahi bhai vo (MC)×(MC) hai🤣

    • @Raj-ox2kx
      @Raj-ox2kx 3 дні тому +6

      @@artisharma.... sorry bhai aapka equation ka proof bhi ha 😁😁

    • @HumanistLogic
      @HumanistLogic 3 дні тому +4

      😂😂😂😂😂

    • @Truth_Jc007
      @Truth_Jc007 2 дні тому +4

      😂😂😂

  • @GranMetallik
    @GranMetallik 3 дні тому +62

    Nasa is the separate fan base of these andhbhakts😂

    • @tdj461
      @tdj461 3 дні тому +7

      Poor Nasa, the US government didn't fund them enough as they do for the military so Nasa couldn't buy a 15 k ₹ Vedic physics book from Amazon so they call our great great great..... [2000 years later] great Acharya Agnivrat, but our Acharya ji is patriotic so he rejected their offer. Now he will collaborate with ISRO and our nation will be going to develop an anti gravity vehicle soon 🤯🧠.

    • @shaktism_02
      @shaktism_02 3 дні тому +4

      Us government take Nasa name from nasadiya sukt of rigveda

    • @tdj461
      @tdj461 3 дні тому

      @@shaktism_02 ye sunke Nasa ko nashe karne ki adat ho gai 💀

    • @PremGamer-z1i
      @PremGamer-z1i 3 дні тому

      Haa wnko to or kam nehi hay 😂😂😂😂

    • @shaktism_02
      @shaktism_02 3 дні тому

      @@PremGamer-z1i we should put copyright strike on Nasa
      For copy the name of nasa from nasadiya sukt of rigveda .

  • @satishchoudhary9822
    @satishchoudhary9822 3 дні тому +72

    Ye formula dekhkar meri hasi nahi ruk rahi .. andbakt kitne chutiyen ho sakten h 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @quickSilverXMen
    @quickSilverXMen 3 дні тому +9

    Hey Kshitij I don't have words to describe your efforts, your courage, your calmness to address these utter pseudo science claims by these UA-camrs.
    I always wanted to make these kind of videos to debunk these clowns but since I didn't able to study Physics and further higher studies, becoz I entered in corporate world to support my family. Becoz to debunk these kind of sophistication pseudo science you need to have good understanding of the subject.
    Again I appreciate your wittines to address the issue without any gali galauj.
    Thank you.

  • @adityajoshi287
    @adityajoshi287 3 дні тому +23

    They say MC^2 represents non duality, and Om also represents non duality.
    So..... according to this analogy:
    LGBTQ+ represents non duality, and Om represents non duality.
    So according to their own logic, Om is same as LGBTQ+
    I'm sure they'll love this! xDD

    • @PiggyPets
      @PiggyPets 3 дні тому

    • @tdj461
      @tdj461 3 дні тому +5

      Your critique is good but the analogy is wrong. LGBTQ+ means more than 2 meanwhile non-dualism means only 1.

    • @suryashukla4036
      @suryashukla4036 3 дні тому +2

      @@tdj461 he is one of that lgbtq🤣🤣

    • @FreakGUY-007
      @FreakGUY-007 2 дні тому

      ​@@tdj461 LGBTQ means just one 😂.. Lol
      They made this term for this reason. Lesbian is just one specific gender. Not two..

    • @ffgnikhilgaming9621
      @ffgnikhilgaming9621 9 годин тому

      ​@@suryashukla4036 don't impose your gender on others😂

  • @pranav210591
    @pranav210591 3 дні тому +12

    To be honest, I see this as a bit of a failure from the scientific community. Science has become centered around these conversations by celebrity scientists or rich capitalists like Elon Musk etc. I have an engineering degree from an IIT and a master's from IISc and I can't wrap my head around a lot of these ideas. Most people in our country do not need knowledge of particle physics, let alone unproven ideas like string theory or multiverse theory. But pop-science is full of this. Religiopolitical groups can very easily exploit the vagueness around the terms in these areas and benefit from gullibility of masses.
    A lot of my colleagues and co-workers struggle with simple ideas like scientific method, logic, epistemology, falsifiability, design of experiments, statistical significance etc. These are the things which are of way more significance to the common man. Even if they do not provide employment directly, these things can help people develop a rational outlook and at the very least save their hard-earned money from scamsters.

    • @astrokshitij3478
      @astrokshitij3478  3 дні тому +2

      That’s so true and insightful

    • @S-tb4sc
      @S-tb4sc 3 дні тому +1

      Hello, Mr. Pranav.
      Please reply to my comment.
      I'm interested to have a talk with you. I'm a student of MIT .

    • @pranav210591
      @pranav210591 2 дні тому

      @@S-tb4sc Ok, I'm listening.

    • @blazedabizarre1876
      @blazedabizarre1876 День тому

      ​@@pranav210591that's obviously a bait

    • @epiphanicsoul9119
      @epiphanicsoul9119 7 годин тому

      The fear of disillusionment is compelling these propaganda machinery to devise a novel correlation between science and mythology and surprisingly in the crux of this propagation, they are saying that past civilisation was even more advanced and should be brought back to the current era. Ultimately, making a conservative back steps to the pasts which never existed the way it is visualised now.

  • @iamdharma14
    @iamdharma14 3 дні тому +12

    Yahi nhi Om =mc², Gravity, Pascal, HP, Acceleration, Speed, Atomic Bomb, Univers, AI , Multiverse 😂😂😂😅

  • @shruti4357
    @shruti4357 3 дні тому +9

    Religion and science should never be mixed. Im a religious person but that is something about my personal feelings and beliefs something that feels like a place of peace and hope to keep living. But just making all that nonsense claims ki hame to sb pata hai?
    As a student of physics Its so frustrating to look at people just taking the years of efforts and work a scientist is putting in coming up with great ideas and theories so lightly and stating ki hmare yaha to we knew this already.
    And as a hindu its embarassing as well
    Dharma is something which should be there to keep you going on the right track .
    Om = mc^2??? 😂😂 Its so funny to think ki koi itna creative soch raha hai
    And with such confidence
    I might read a 100 books over a topic and still not gef this amount of confidence on speaking something about it

    • @AlienBabUfo
      @AlienBabUfo 2 дні тому +2

      Choti - you are too young to understand about Vedas, Vedanta and Upanishads. All I can say right now study hard and understand the basic concepts once you are free take out time to study basic of Quantum Physic and then read Vedanta to begin with...then you will understand.
      Santhan Dharam has three major approaching angles.(no one ever will tell you this - people make million of dollars out of this)
      1. From religious point of view - when and where people do rituals and pray goddess and gods (mainly temples and astrology, kundali (horoscope), remedies, mantras jaap etc)
      2. As a way of life - following traditions and culture ( pitr sharadha, yoga, meditation, focusing on inner self that what you are describing " development of philosophies" not marrying in same gotra (due to blood fusion) preserving mother earth by using natural produce for eg...cow's milk, urine, cow dung, by planting trees, being kind to animals, birds etc)
      3. From quantum physic point of view - This is where things get spiced up 👻👻....here the gods & goddess are NOT gods & goddess as we are told or know - but taken as huge force fields spread across space - that's why we also know - brahma as the creator, vishnu - as the preserver and shiva - as the destroyer. besides like devi kali compared to black hole as symbolism of tongue that she licked blood of "rakth beez" where ever it feel - thus black hole - absorbs everything even light...see the "reference" this is just in a nutshell I am explaining.
      Problem is that Indians who are good in Vedic knowledge (Sanskirt) they are poor in Quantum Physic (English) and vice versa..that's why when vedic acharya try to explain they are unable to explain from "science" point of view and when quantum physicists try to explain they are unable to pin point the Vedic reference... so people think its "cherry picking" and they often laugh calling it pseudo science.

    • @kidseller177
      @kidseller177 День тому

      @@AlienBabUfo metaphors aint science lil bro and its right this is pseudoscience fuck those sanatan reveals and vigyan darshan

    • @ffgnikhilgaming9621
      @ffgnikhilgaming9621 9 годин тому

      ​@@AlienBabUfo Gawaar, your brain is not developed enough to understand science.

  • @theplatinumpoo4447
    @theplatinumpoo4447 3 дні тому +2

    1:52 it might sound dumb but AS BEST AS I UNDERSTAND motion and rest are relative to the subject. Is this somehow accounted for?

    • @tombombadil3953
      @tombombadil3953 2 дні тому

      There is nothing called "absolute rest" or "absolute motion". They are always told with respect to some reference frame.

  • @randombooklover-r2t
    @randombooklover-r2t 3 дні тому +5

    Bioshala of physics😮👍

  • @ParveshDishodia
    @ParveshDishodia 3 дні тому +1

    The way you explained what is the mass..is something extraordinary... keep it up..like to see more videos like this...

  • @curiosity_fan
    @curiosity_fan 3 дні тому +3

    Found your channel, probably because of the thumbnail and title. Very nicely explained and debunked. Great work.

  • @tombombadil3953
    @tombombadil3953 2 дні тому +1

    This video is increasing by curiosity in Physics. I left Physics after school, but it always amazes me. I want to learn it as a hobby someday 😊😊😇

  • @soch_924
    @soch_924 3 дні тому +1

    Mujhe pahli bar tumhara channel meri feed mein dikha, yaar Kitna achcha video banate Ho. Aur tujhe Maine subscribe bhi Kiya kyunki tera Gyan bahut kam ka hai.
    Thank You ! Bahut accha video banaya.

  • @AaravVerma247
    @AaravVerma247 22 хвилини тому

    Mera seedha sa sawal ye hai ki om = mc^2 bolna hi kyu hai bhai?
    E = mc^2 se kaam chal hi raha to continue rakho, ye ek saath 4 chize mix kyu kar rhe?

  • @satya6813
    @satya6813 3 дні тому +1

    Behtareen Explanation 👏

  • @vidhyacharanwathore
    @vidhyacharanwathore 2 дні тому +1

    wow what a explaination...only bcoz of you we can can explain properly infront of andhbhakt..thank you so much

  • @akhandtripathipyz9888
    @akhandtripathipyz9888 3 дні тому +3

    Great video
    The calming background music really helps too

  • @ChiragTripathi01
    @ChiragTripathi01 3 дні тому +2

    Actually you can put anything on left side of equation as long as you claim that it is having dimension of energy, replacing E by Om or any other symbol that represents the content of energy. Key idea is it must be some form of equivalence of energy. For example, let's say a mass defect gets converted to energy in a nuclear reaction which is equivalent to 20,000 TNTs then same equation can be written in terms of TNTs. Argument of relative motion also doesn't hold good, because frame of reference is arbitrary. This video is good explanation of E=mc2 but that's it.

    • @Yash-972
      @Yash-972 3 дні тому

      So are you saying that Om = MC² could be correct equation provided that Om is dimension of energy or equivalence of energy?

    • @ChiragTripathi01
      @ChiragTripathi01 3 дні тому

      @@Yash-972 I'm saying not just OM, you can replace it with anything having the same dimension and unit equivalence, that's how E has been put, it is supposed to show the total energy of the system, which itself needs the definition of being equivalent to something.

    • @Yash-972
      @Yash-972 2 дні тому

      @@ChiragTripathi01 ohh I get it, thanks for clarifying!

    • @VinitChaubey448
      @VinitChaubey448 2 дні тому

      ​​@@ChiragTripathi01 Mr. Chirag, as much as I know, every mathematically correct equation is dimensionally correct. But the reverse case is not true.
      You are claiming that anything which has same dimension as energy can be put in the equation in the place of energy. This will only ensure the dimensional correctness of the equation. Numerically the equation may be false.

    • @ChiragTripathi01
      @ChiragTripathi01 2 дні тому

      @VinitChaubey448 True, it may be false but then it is not the problem of representation but the choice of units. Units can always be chosen in such a way so that this equation can be written in the required form. That's what we are doing with E also, in physics we really don't understand energy, it is always taken as equivalent to something such as in calories equivalent or Joules equivalent. Now Om is taken as one of the fundamental vibration and depending on how we define the equivalence E can be represented in terms of Oms as well and of course by any other form of energy. It may sound ridiculous but that's the way it is, Kshitij's point is to be precise in terms of energy but what I want to convey is neither we understand energy nor we understand Om intuitively but a form of similar expression can always be achieved by any array of representation.

  • @AnalysisLegend
    @AnalysisLegend 3 дні тому +5

    wo sirf scientifically wrong nahi hindu spiritual philosophically bhi wrong hai to Jo hindu philosophy khojta hai use bhi research karni chahiye sirf Science guys ko nahi "Aum = mc²" na sirf science ke principles ke khilaaf hai, balki spirituality ke essence ko bhi distort karta hai. Aum ek spiritual aur universal concept hai, jo material boundaries se pare hai. Use ek physical formula mein bound karna na sirf uski anantta ko seemit karta hai, balki uske spiritual arth ka hani bhi karta hai. Science aur spirituality alag fields hain, unhe mix karna dono ki asli beauty ko kharaab karta hai. BTW mei ek Atheist hoon lekin tab bhi hindu philosophy acchi lagti hai isliye thodi knowledge acchi baat hai....

    • @AlienBabUfo
      @AlienBabUfo 2 дні тому

      Why brother why ??? AUM / OM is the "root mantra" do you even understand what does it mean ?
      1. Laws of energy has proven again and again everything in this universe is a wave or vibrating energy.
      2. Consciousness creates energy and energy creates mass
      3. Billion dollar question - Who controls the oscillatory movement in an atom so precise that if that movement is even slightly uneven....we all know neutrons, protons, electrons will collapse with the nucleus of that atom.
      Who is controlling that "movement" who started that "movement" now you got the lead where OM / AUM comes from after all its the "root mantra"
      Vedas Vedanta and Upanishads have three approach angle.
      1. Spiritual - Meditation, Mantra jaaps, Kundali jagran, etc
      2. A Way of life - Rituals, Havan, Celebration, Festivals, Yoga etc
      3. Quantum Physic - Theories of everything.
      First talk to some person dealing with Quantum Physic or Astro Physic before jumping into conclusion.

    • @semicolon6499
      @semicolon6499 2 дні тому

      Learn advait vedant

  • @hemantpatel4953
    @hemantpatel4953 3 дні тому +1

    Nice job bro india need these types of channel kyuki aaj kal koi bhi science aur dharm ke nam par kuch bhi bol deta hai internet par aur log use hi sach man lete hai

  • @AK-gm2ge
    @AK-gm2ge 3 дні тому

    Beautifully explained. Gave me the most brilliant expansion of the equation than ever. I hope the best for you.

  • @mojtube6739
    @mojtube6739 3 дні тому +2

    Very good work for humanity

  • @theadityasahu07
    @theadityasahu07 3 дні тому +1

    By the way E=mc^2 does not have any mathematical derivation prove it is formula to convert mass into energy given by Sir Albert Einstein

  • @NishanT_ACM
    @NishanT_ACM 2 дні тому +4

    To all the haters he might not be the right person to educate about hindu scriptures but hindu do try to find cause and reason behind every occurance
    Name a feild that Hindus hasnt wrote a book about
    From biology to universe to kinematics to history to economics to trigonometry to architecture to music to RITUALS GHOST everything
    Many were right many are proven wrong but at least they tried to do something better for the world than THE "KEYWORD WARRIORS" HERE

    • @MainHarshit
      @MainHarshit 5 годин тому

      TRUE! Hindus have scientific knowledge..

  • @shivanshc01
    @shivanshc01 3 дні тому +127

    अंधभक्त : Unseen planets, Galaxy, Black hole in center of galaxy, The sun is also revolving, Laws of motion, Big Bang theory, Theory of relativity, Nuclear weapons, यह सब हमारी धार्मिक किताब में है। 😂😂😂

    • @thelogicless9040
      @thelogicless9040 3 дні тому +50

      Aur ye sara gayn inko tab hi dikhta hai jab science mai koi nai discovery hoti hai. Usse pehle inhe kuch pata nahi hota

    • @shivanshc01
      @shivanshc01 3 дні тому

      @thelogicless9040 दो कौड़ी का वेद, विज्ञान के सामने कुछ भी नहीं है। कुछ धार्मिक चूतिए ही, विज्ञान के दौर में, आज भी धर्म और अंधविश्वास फैलाते हैं।

    • @aloneboy_0696
      @aloneboy_0696 3 дні тому +1

      😂

    • @abhijitsingh9571
      @abhijitsingh9571 3 дні тому +16

      ​​@@thelogicless9040bro aisa kuch hai bhi nhi , ye matphors ya symbolic meaning ko real scientific research se compare krte h directly😂, jaise hawa, dharti etc to space- time se .

    • @Wamanmeshramji
      @Wamanmeshramji 3 дні тому +19

      चलेगी तर्क की आंधी तो आएंगे कई धर्म लपेटे में, पाखंड किसी एक धर्म में थोड़ी ना है।
      पाखंड चर्म पर है (science Journey)देखो 🎉

  • @alihome512
    @alihome512 3 дні тому +1

    So aswome explanation........with rich scientific knowledge....
    Can u plz make a video about time and its scientific understanding

  • @vickysaksena9568
    @vickysaksena9568 3 дні тому +1

    SIR BAHUT HI SAHI KAAM KIYA HAI AAPNE 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 WELL DONE ❤

  • @parthhooda3713
    @parthhooda3713 День тому

    2:13 it does not "happen to be" that exact constant more accurately it is not square of speed of light but square of speed of causality it isn't a mere coincidence that E=mc^2 it's because information travels at maximum speed of c, it's because this speed is same in all reference frames not because it is speed of light but because it is speed of causality.
    2:18 again, it isn't that just because it fits in the units or dimension, so it works but because it works, it fits in the units. You could argue that E=mv^2 where v is velocity of object or that E=w(dI/dt) where w is angular velocity of object and dI/dt just represents rate of change in moment of inertia (I) because you can see that right- and left-hand side have same dimensions but obviously this is not true.

  • @dizzyblossom5968
    @dizzyblossom5968 2 дні тому

    Bahut he acha video tha jitna is video se samajh aaya utna ajtak nahi aaya tha

  • @hadifzargar
    @hadifzargar 3 дні тому +7

    1] i watch your videos
    2] i learn from u
    3] Then i create my own video 😂

  • @nixhnot5227
    @nixhnot5227 3 дні тому +1

    Bro make such type of more video , It is useful .।।। Great work❤

  • @bigwiener-fr8gm
    @bigwiener-fr8gm 2 дні тому +3

    Super needed video
    Thanks for the extensive research ☝🏻💪🏻☝🏻

    • @astrokshitij3478
      @astrokshitij3478  2 дні тому +1

      Glad you liked it!

    • @bigwiener-fr8gm
      @bigwiener-fr8gm День тому +1

      ​​@@astrokshitij3478 keep uploading bro ☝🏻☝🏻
      These antiquity pleaders
      Can't even interpret or make an antibiogram but still they claim, there is everything in Vedas 😌🤡

  • @Chemical_adda
    @Chemical_adda 23 години тому +1

    Great work 👏

  • @dhruvalparmar3166
    @dhruvalparmar3166 День тому

    Your explanations are simple and effective. Bhai you should start a new English channel to reach international audience.
    Creators like you, are really needed, not only in India but worldwide

  • @satishchoudhary9822
    @satishchoudhary9822 3 дні тому +6

    Ye sab kya dekhna pad raha h .. achha h main andha hun na ki andhbhakt 😂😂😂😂

  • @anirbanbhattacharjee8462
    @anirbanbhattacharjee8462 3 дні тому

    Apki explanation bahot achi thi
    Bas ek baat point out karna chahunga
    Aapne bola water me detergent milao mass energy conversion hoga
    Lekin wahan mass energy conversion nahi hoga kyu ki wahan law of conservation of mass follow hota hai
    Mass energy conversion sirf nuclear reaction me hoga jahan mass defect milta hai kyu ki ek nuclues dusre me convert ho jata hai

    • @astrokshitij3478
      @astrokshitij3478  3 дні тому

      That’s actually a misconception, even I use to think that way earlier but then I came across this paper “E=mc^2 and the weight of energy” by Fabiana (2018)
      Basically conservation of mass is our physical inability to measure the minimal reduced mass. That’s why even in my video I said that we cannot measure it practically. I guess there’s a simple explanation to this in one of the video of Fermilab (I don’t remember which one) but that has also covered this.
      Just to make it more intuitive, every reaction either exothermic or endothermic is one way or another playing role in mass energy or energy mass conversion.

    • @anirbanbhattacharjee8462
      @anirbanbhattacharjee8462 3 дні тому

      Thank you I got to know a completely new thing which I was totally unaware of even after having an M. Sc in physics

  • @manthansingh8036
    @manthansingh8036 3 дні тому

    Loved your explanation of the equation

  • @priteshkamble1962
    @priteshkamble1962 4 години тому

    Bro didn't disrespect any religion bro debunked misconceptions I am writing to show respect to my bro chad bro 🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿

  • @whimsicalvagabond6906
    @whimsicalvagabond6906 3 дні тому +2

    Excellent work.

  • @MainHarshit
    @MainHarshit 6 годин тому +1

    Nice !
    I would like if you also debunk that Quran Says the Earth is flat like carpet and Humans cannot pass the Earth's Orbit without Authority
    😊

  • @foku486
    @foku486 5 годин тому

    Dil Jeet Liya Bhai ❤

  • @DevangVyas-m5i
    @DevangVyas-m5i 3 дні тому +2

    Nice work Bro....!! ❤ . U have such an inspiring personality ❤❤

  • @TheCricketGuyOfficial
    @TheCricketGuyOfficial 2 дні тому

    BGM name pls ?????

  • @himanshusojitra1
    @himanshusojitra1 2 дні тому

    I am just interested in background music here 🎶 😀

  • @Truth_Jc007
    @Truth_Jc007 2 дні тому +2

    Great content ❤❤❤

  • @GREEDFORKNOWLEDGE-vb5fb
    @GREEDFORKNOWLEDGE-vb5fb 3 дні тому +1

    Bhaiya hum hazar bar inko debunk karenge Hazaro arguments dete rahenge phir bhi yeh lichar kabhi sudhrenge nahi. Kyuki inko dharm ka dhanda chalana hain.. Bhad mein jaye rationality, bhadd mein jaye science inko chahiye chuthiye Audience aur andha paisa.. sab kuch paisa or power ka hi lalach hainn. Sirf social media se kuch nahi hoga agar yeh sab bandh karna chahte hain toh pehele education system ko badalna padega.. Science, philosophy sabkuch shikhana padega.. lekin kash aisa hota. U know bhaiya hum yaha pe jitne bhi Rational log hain sabhi ne khudse apne Thinking ko aise develop kiya hain. Agar humare aspas ke teacher professors, parents sabhi log rational ban jaye tab sayad iye dikkat khatam ho sakta hain.. pata nahi yaar kab tak chalega yeh sab.. but. Anyways Good job Bhaiya... Aise hi aur videos late raho ..❤❤❤

    • @subhamsingh99998
      @subhamsingh99998 3 дні тому

      @@GREEDFORKNOWLEDGE-vb5fb true i agree
      Aapne philosophy ki baat Maine iska interpretation aise Kiya please correct me
      You are talking about Darshan and Upanishads and you want to teach them in school so people know the true ideology and philosophy of Vedic dharma that they have deep explanations in metaphysics and exploring reality

    • @subhamsingh99998
      @subhamsingh99998 3 дні тому

      @@GREEDFORKNOWLEDGE-vb5fb Or bhai aap ko mujhe batana tha ki
      Hyper quest ne om equal to mc2 kyu bola
      Usne yeh nhi bola ki yeh formula Rishi ka hai yeh modern science ki hi hai
      Bas baat yeh hai ki
      E matlb energy and om matlb bhi energy hota hai isliya interchangeable hai bass

    • @subhamsingh99998
      @subhamsingh99998 3 дні тому

      @@GREEDFORKNOWLEDGE-vb5fb Hyper quest bahut modern temperament ka aadmi hai
      Aap uski ved vs vigyan yeh athiest vs thiest debate dekho bahut hi acha hai na ki koi andhbhakt

  • @Ayush_Mallick
    @Ayush_Mallick День тому

    Bro proved that the website SAND is wrong 👍

  • @ashmOOd
    @ashmOOd День тому

    Great Video dude

  • @AyushKumar-xb5or
    @AyushKumar-xb5or 3 дні тому

    We want a video on nitrino

  • @sumitss6lite286
    @sumitss6lite286 3 дні тому +1

    How to make money being a scientist in present times?
    Propose a hypothesis which supports the agenda of everything came from our scriptures.
    Be good with tailoring the evidence.
    Write a research paper.
    Shout on social media and brag about our culture.

  • @nayankrishnatiwari7543
    @nayankrishnatiwari7543 3 дні тому +1

    आप चैनल के नाम में , क्षितिज को हिन्दी में क्यों नहीं लिख देते , खैर वीडियो बढ़िया था 👍 , विज्ञान को ऊंचे से ऊंचे स्थान भारत में दिलाना होगा

  • @atrevelop8088
    @atrevelop8088 3 дні тому +1

    Fundamentaly dekha jaye to ha ham om likh sakte hai om choro ham kuch bhi likh skte hai E ki jagh. E is just a representative of momentum nothing else

  • @kamaldeepsingh5397
    @kamaldeepsingh5397 3 дні тому

    Or electron ka mass k,ha se ata hai fr?

  • @aakashmondal7685
    @aakashmondal7685 3 дні тому

    Keep up the good work bro .

  • @Athiesm770
    @Athiesm770 3 дні тому

    Good work

  • @shilasarkar6003
    @shilasarkar6003 5 годин тому

    Thid myth even exists?
    O am flabbergasted RN

  • @thekitchen7275
    @thekitchen7275 2 дні тому +2

    Come in front me. I will teach you.
    Prof. Dr.Sakharkar

  • @SujataAthor
    @SujataAthor 2 дні тому +1

    Om mani padme hum. Find out where did om originally came from.

  • @ANDROIDPOSTMORTEM
    @ANDROIDPOSTMORTEM 2 дні тому +1

    Sqrt( Hyper Quest ) = MC 😂

  • @AvinashKumarChakrawarti
    @AvinashKumarChakrawarti 3 дні тому +1

    Nice video ❤

  • @kamaldeepsingh5397
    @kamaldeepsingh5397 3 дні тому

    Neutrino ki kra ke mass se question hai je

  • @thunderpokemon2456
    @thunderpokemon2456 2 дні тому

    Actuall, its
    E/c^2 = M
    Mass can be converted to pure energy thats were atomic bomb created.

  • @ytubeguruji863
    @ytubeguruji863 3 дні тому

    Why is the speed of light taken as a constant?

    • @ytubeguruji863
      @ytubeguruji863 3 дні тому

      Also why is energy confined within the realm of mass?

  • @knm19870
    @knm19870 3 дні тому +5

    Dear sir, its just not that they don't know science, but unfortunately they don't know Upanishad and vedanta for sure. Om or akhashar brahma or ultimate truth of Self (as described in kath Upanishad, conversation between jam and nachiketa). Vedant direct one to understand the self and inner libaration from all internal conflicts of mind to reach Self. But unfortunately these semi literates also tranishing the things we should be proud of. They don't understand about adhyatma. So they wanted reflected glory by manufacturing such pathetic pseudo science. Very sad.

    • @UnknownKing-ov7eh
      @UnknownKing-ov7eh 2 дні тому +1

      Are bhai thum sab sahi bol rha ho par ye samj nahi rahe ho ki om 🕉 hai na uska nam he hai energy aur thume ache se patha hai ki pura universe is made of energy and forms of energy yes or no?
      Thats why 🕉 is a pura universa ka all forms of energy.
      Therefore if you read upanishads from that we say that everything is om (energy) and the energy is god so god is everything and the energy is you because you also made up of energy thats why you are a energy (god) so you are god yourself. you(energy) were present everywhere.
      If i am wrong please reply and ask questions i hope you understand.
      E = mc² se mauje kuch be lena dena kuch nahi hai muje lina hai mass is a form of energy and energy is called 🕉 in Hinduism saying that everything is made by energy in upanishads
      Phele pado upanishads ko bad me Hinduism ke bare mae comment karna socho

    • @knm19870
      @knm19870 День тому

      @@UnknownKing-ov7eh ua-cam.com/video/Vs8PLfUBYoc/v-deo.htmlsi=PGVsUj2HDa95aOS3

    • @knm19870
      @knm19870 День тому

      ua-cam.com/video/8jsHGOWk1lg/v-deo.htmlsi=SnETcQH4QkW3M1O4

    • @knm19870
      @knm19870 День тому

      @@UnknownKing-ov7eh as per kathopanishad om is representation of akshar Brahma or atma. Please difine Brahma.
      Sarve veda jat padamamanmati sarvani cha jadbadanti/ jadichchhanto brahmacharjaranti tatte padam snghrahena brabimyomitetat.(1/2/15) etaddhebakhsharang Brahma etaddhebakhsharang param/ etaddhebakhsharang galntya Jo jadichchhati tasya tat.(1/2/16) from kathopanishad.

    • @knm19870
      @knm19870 День тому

      @@AlienBabUfo really!! Ooo soo inciteful🙈🙉🙊🤭😆😆😁. For your kind information, before giving such rats' fart, there are several translation works of vedas, Upanishads, Gitas available please go and check out first. Indeed there are three ways in hindu/sanatan dharma, gyan marg, karma marg and vakti marg, and first one is mandatory to follow last two properly. And one must have the key of vedanta (the main piller of Hinduism) to properly understand and decipher the meaning of all smriti sahitya. If anything in smriti sahitya contradicts veda and contradicts vedanta then it's to be discarded. For example astrology has no vedanta so it must be discarded.
      Have you ever tried to understand Nirvanastakam by Adi Shankaracharya? If not please go through and try to understand. It's one of the classic example of neti neti and charaiveti charaiveti of vedanta. And for your kind information all those scriptures teach about atma gyan .. to observe the self ruthlessly and to be liberated from all the bond of desire.. Maya.. (vidya). It has it's own glory. Whereas science deals with all the outer thing (jagat, which includes leaving body also) that can be termed as avidya. Astabakra gita defines self as 'Nahm deho na me deho bodhohmiti nishchaya..' (11/6, 2/22).

  • @andysaccount392
    @andysaccount392 3 дні тому

    22.00 best point

  • @agyaani36
    @agyaani36 3 дні тому

    Shi kiya bhai OM ko ek normal insaan ki equation jo true bhi h ya nhi usse relate kr rhe h
    Upanishad me toh diya h
    Om iti etad aksharam Edam sarvam
    Mandukya Upanishad 1st matra

  • @subhamsingh99998
    @subhamsingh99998 3 дні тому

    I know that you will not get exactly these THEORY in Hindu granth
    But keeping purana aside which are stories and examples of main granth
    The main granth is ved Upanishads or darshan
    And believe me those do not talk about rituals or things of worldly life
    They have deep THEORY philosophy and explanation that are mind blowing
    perspective
    I would suggest to just search or see an video about an darshan or Upanishads (not ved because they are not well interpreted but also it's starting chapter are rituals related that will bore you and later chapter of ved talks bout metaphysics and reality exploration)
    I can guarantee their philosophy will make you read them and they are so deep that when you will read you will get an different level of experience
    By the way sir what's your view on Upanishads or darshan

    • @okay.90
      @okay.90 3 дні тому

      @@subhamsingh99998 ved Upanishads are Philosophical not Science! And you will not get any Scientific theory in any of them!( Philosophy is amazing no doubt) But not Science!!

    • @astrokshitij3478
      @astrokshitij3478  3 дні тому +1

      I will definitely read them, as of now I don’t have any opinion since I lack the knowledge

    • @subhamsingh99998
      @subhamsingh99998 3 дні тому

      ​@@astrokshitij3478 sure sir I appreciated your reply
      I would expect a future video on those text 😊

    • @subhamsingh99998
      @subhamsingh99998 3 дні тому +1

      On the basis of logical temperament

    • @nahanah-x2g
      @nahanah-x2g 3 дні тому

      Ofc brother everyone know Indians philosophies are way something different, But there is huge difference between Technology Scientific formulaes and Our philosophies,But kattar hindu nowadays are just blah blah everyone was copying Hinduism sarrrr everyone is hindu sarr all scientific discoveries already in ved and Upanishads sarrr niggga really dont even read a single ved or Upanishads and claim anything abruptly wrong that is embarassing Hinduism itself, To all the kattar Hindus get a life bruh read your literature, Padhle bhai Internet par Kattar Hindu edit banane se akhand bharat nahi banega 🙏🏻

  • @subhamsingh99998
    @subhamsingh99998 3 дні тому

    You will bot get exact shlok for these modern science theory
    But philosophy of Upanishads and darshan or ved have something similar from my experience
    Like world is a illusion or adviya and our chit(mind) is shaping it.
    Isha Upanishad (1):
    > "That is whole, this is whole; from the whole, the whole becomes manifest.
    Taking away the whole from the whole,
    the whole remains."
    This resonates with quantum field theories and the concept of the universe as an interconnected whole
    Dont judge that this is not clearly explained because this is just one shlok and Upanishads exolore it nore deep in later shlok
    One more thing that is same
    Mundaka Upanishad (2.1.1):
    > "As from a well-blazing fire, sparks by the thousands arise,
    So from the Imperishable, diverse beings are born and return."
    This analogy aligns with the modern scientific concept of multiple universes emerging from a single origin.
    Taittiriya Upanishad (2.1.1):
    > "From Brahman arises space; from space, air;
    from air, fire; from fire, water;
    from water, earth; from earth, plants;
    from plants, food; from food, the body." This highlights an invisible force (Brahman) as the source of all visible matter and energy, similar to how dark energy and dark matter are believed to shape the cosmos.
    Vishnu Purana (1.3.1):
    > "From Vishnu's breath emerge countless universes,
    and with each exhale and inhale, they dissolve and are reborn." This aligns with speculative models where universes arise from quantum fluctuations or black holes
    Tye puran example is taken as metaphor because i am a Upanishads learner and think that puran are illustrative examples of principal of Upanishads and ved.
    Now from abive things i am not saying that modern science is nothing or vedic text are more or less than modern science.
    I am just stating that singke shlok sounds these resonating from scientific concept
    So the actual whole ved or Upanishads or darshan would be how logical temperament and exciting.

    • @subhamsingh99998
      @subhamsingh99998 3 дні тому

      In these I know various people who never have a idea about Upanishads will say that BRAHMAN is mentioned there this is castiem or this that
      The bhraman in Upanishads are not caste even not varna
      BRAHMAN is the reality from which all universes developed and the reality we are finding and Braham is the source of all cosmos.

    • @HarshitB-nt1fm
      @HarshitB-nt1fm 3 дні тому +1

      Where are mathematical equations and evidence in which they concluded this?

    • @subhamsingh99998
      @subhamsingh99998 3 дні тому

      ​@@HarshitB-nt1fm See brother it will be wrong seeing ancient Philosophy with the point of view of mathematics
      Because modern science finds mathematics relatively a better method for research.
      But those texts focus more on philosophy.
      But I agree that ved, Upanishads and darshan just state things but don't give proof yeah they say to measure this knowledge on your own logical reasoning level
      So the question or logical question arises how they knew these things yes they say by logical reasoning they found these things(by reading you will know)

    • @subhamsingh99998
      @subhamsingh99998 3 дні тому

      ​@@HarshitB-nt1fm But we can't forget that these texts are very relevant and doens't talk illogical things
      Just like science works on hypothesis then theory or law
      These texts also explore the same thing the universe by linking to self realisation and knowing the ultimate true knowledge of universe called BRAHMAN

    • @DMS_dms
      @DMS_dms 3 дні тому +1

      I am not seeing anything scientific here💀Energy can be measured now say can on be measured or energy can be transformed can on be💀And also This verses are more close to panthiesm rather than Energy and E only represents Energy not matter energy duality Idk What do you guys mean by Matter energy Duallity but at last tell me a single place where this is interpreted as E=mc^2 by your sooooo wiseee rishiii's😂

  • @ManojKumar-c5h8b
    @ManojKumar-c5h8b 3 дні тому +2

    Dukh iss baat ka hai iit se pada banada, aur phd kiye huye log aise illogical baate krte hai.

  • @AnilAnil-yf9sf
    @AnilAnil-yf9sf 2 дні тому

    सत्य ही परम धर्म है सच्चाई को सामने लाने के लिए धन्यवाद।

  • @S.Ansari0747
    @S.Ansari0747 3 дні тому +1

    dharmic log science manege nhi bt prove science se krenge

  • @36KACRE
    @36KACRE 3 дні тому +2

    Roght Wing and Left wing dono same hee hai
    Bas thoda tareeka dono ka alag h 😂

    • @tdj461
      @tdj461 3 дні тому

      Context?

    • @36KACRE
      @36KACRE 3 дні тому +1

      @tdj461
      Left wing and right wing both are Krishna bhakts both are ignorant
      Both get hurt when you don't believe with their ideology

    • @okay.90
      @okay.90 3 дні тому +1

      ​@@36KACRE who is Krishna?

    • @RationalAI-o4p
      @RationalAI-o4p 3 дні тому +4

      ​@@36KACRE video me left wing aur right wing ki baat hi nahi ho rahi
      Aur tum to wahi typical religious people ki tarah baat kar rahe ho
      Tum keh rahe ho
      Everyone is krishna's devotee
      Christians will say: Everyone is Jesus's child
      Muslims will say:
      Everyone is present here because of Allah
      Tumlogon me se kiski baat ko sahi mana jaye because all of you are saying these without any evidence and logic

  • @pradeepmverma786
    @pradeepmverma786 2 дні тому

    I hope sudhanshu ji ne ye sab padha hoga😊😊😊😊😊

  • @soch_924
    @soch_924 3 дні тому +2

    Aisa hi kuchh musalmanon mein bhi hai, Allah ne Chand per Talwar Mari aur Chand ke do tukde Ho Gaye😅 Mera dost mujhe bata raha tha😂

    • @asifdama4827
      @asifdama4827 3 дні тому

      Allah ne talwar nahi mari balke allah ke hukum se mere nabi hazrat Muhammad sallallahu alaihi wasallam ne ungli ke ishare se chand ke do tukde kiye. Yeh unho ne disbelievers ko yeh samjha ne ke liye kiya ke woh allah ke messenger hai taki woh log unki baat maane aur Allah ki ibadat kare. Aur yeh kaam mere nabi hazrat Muhammad sallallahu alaihi wasallam ne apni marzi ya hunar se nahin kiya balki allah ke hukum se kar paye.

    • @ClashKing-g6b
      @ClashKing-g6b День тому

      Fake story​@@asifdama4827

  • @Roaming_SID
    @Roaming_SID 3 дні тому

    Nice video very informative

  • @aloneboy_0696
    @aloneboy_0696 3 дні тому +1

    Great video more needed for developing a better+united nation ❤

  • @semicolon6499
    @semicolon6499 2 дні тому

    Himself Hindus upanishad says : " ॐ is not any energy, ॐ is a simply consciousness state . Like dream sleep , deep sleep and awakening . "
    🤣🤣 Our Hindu never read upanishads that's why thay menuplate the science .

  • @abhinav6941
    @abhinav6941 3 дні тому

    Great bro 👍

  • @fzhz
    @fzhz 2 дні тому

    Ab kuch logo ki bhavana ahat ho jayegi😂😂

  • @varunsharma3532
    @varunsharma3532 3 дні тому +1

    Krishna = kaali

  • @AshutoshRaghuwanshi
    @AshutoshRaghuwanshi 3 дні тому +1

    जो बेवकूफ़ ऐसी बातों को मानते हैं उन्हें समझाया नहीं जा सकता।

  • @SaurabhMotalkar
    @SaurabhMotalkar 3 дні тому +1

    Woowwwwww i mean absolutely brilliant

  • @fredyjon81
    @fredyjon81 День тому

    Babaji ki bhooti bhi hamari kitab mein hein😂

  • @08scout
    @08scout 3 години тому

    The main reason of misconception is lack of knowledge
    For proper study and understanding of what is actually written in all vedic texts and granths you have to go through immense education of each and every line , every mantra holds its own significane and a depper meaning . For instance lets take Hanuman chalisa , now there are many things that can be found in it but not get into that because its whole another topic . But most importantl fact is that we give our opinion without actually going through it and reading it
    No one here commenting and saying all the silly stuff has never ever read a single vedanta not even bhagvad gita and then they think that they can say what is right and wrong 😂😂
    This is the most hilarious aruguments you all are giving in comments . You all deny what Oppenheimer said , what dr kalam said but agree with what what leftist says ( not talking about this guy) . At the end of they you all are filled with darkness of western history and so called psedioliberals of our own nation .
    Well last thing to say , before debunking or saying that all this stuff is wrong is questionable.
    See i loved your knowledge of mass and other scientfic stuff but lacked in understanding Ohm .
    Its something even bharma the creator could not understand so how the heck we can
    No hate but just a recommendation that next time make sure you have a proper research for both sides as creating a nareative is very easy ❤
    So good luck man keep growing 💗
    And lastly dropping a mantra that is being chanted during havans and pooja from ancient time if you all can understand that then try finding out the concept of vedanta you will have a changed vision
    Then manta is
    ब्रह्मा मुरारिस्त्रिपुरान्तकारी
    भानुः शशी भूमिसुतो बुधश्च ।
    गुरुश्च शुक्रः शनिराहुकेतवः
    कुर्वन्तु सर्वे मम सुप्रभातम् ॥१॥
    Just reply here what it means ...

  • @s.p.nightking
    @s.p.nightking 2 дні тому +6

    Shudhanshu trivedi= mc^2+2 BC - condॐ

  • @tdj461
    @tdj461 3 дні тому +5

    I hope you pin this comment so the other side can understand their claim is not valid in their ground:
    1. Om itself does not mean non duality, it depends on which ideology it follows for example it only works for Advaita, not for Davita or Traita. Still I never saw any Advaiti to say Om represent that. If anyone wants to do that he should create a new symbol like cross (❌) on yin yang (☯️ ) which will mean it's not dual, non dual.
    2. Even if assuming the 1st condition then Om means the subject (Atma/Purush) and the object (Brahm/Prakrati) are the same which is not suggesting that energy and mass are same. But this fact he (Vishal) also knew, he said that because he thought both statments suggesting indirectly non duality which is true but as your (and mine too) perspective, it should not show that way because avarage knowledge of science and philosophy in India already is very low so this type of things spread more misinformation, to #HyperQuest aapko ye baat dhyan mai rakhni chahiye, rahi baat Sudhanshu chacha ki, to unse to koi umid nahi hai.

    • @PankajKumarACT
      @PankajKumarACT 3 дні тому

      Gazedi #hyperqyest se umeed hai aapko 😂😂

    • @tdj461
      @tdj461 3 дні тому

      Unlike others, he knows what he is saying. For example, here he didn't mean Om is energy or mass instead he said "representation", but still he is wrong because he added it to an equation which is a mistake which is far away from thinking that Atma is a type of energy. That's why I know he has basic knowledge to understand his mistakes, others don't.
      Also I have seen him discussing other influencers, on his mistake, so that is the reason why I think so.

  • @08scout
    @08scout 3 години тому

    I have a very simple question for all viewers
    What will make you all belive that sanatan dharma is purely scientific and rember i got a lot of things to prove ( and a lot means a lot ) you all which I won't cause you all can't understand that 😂
    And secondly the beauty of our culture is shown by u all as anyone can put up their views without hesitation but defaming the culture that is not accepted 😊
    So , come for a debate and give logical arguments i ll try to answer few 😂

  • @AndamanNicobar-g6b
    @AndamanNicobar-g6b 3 дні тому +1

    What the hell is OM ?? Energy?

    • @Ayush_Mallick
      @Ayush_Mallick 2 дні тому

      OM is the vibration of the universe

    • @AndamanNicobar-g6b
      @AndamanNicobar-g6b День тому

      @Ayush_Mallick Just because human feels vibration while enchanting OM, it has nothing to do with Univers.

    • @Ayush_Mallick
      @Ayush_Mallick День тому

      @@AndamanNicobar-g6b when you don't know nothing about vibration 👍
      go and study what is vibration.

    • @Ayush_Mallick
      @Ayush_Mallick День тому

      @@AndamanNicobar-g6b Einstein's theory of spacetime tells us that the real universe is not silent, but is actually alive with vibrating energy. 🤡🤡🤡 go and do some Google search buddy

    • @AndamanNicobar-g6b
      @AndamanNicobar-g6b День тому

      @@Ayush_Mallick I know about vibration. What OM is relevant to that?

  • @samajnepal
    @samajnepal 3 дні тому

    good

  • @suryashukla4036
    @suryashukla4036 3 дні тому +5

    BHAI YE SB KA KYA FAYDA LIVE DEBATE M TU HG DETA H🤣🤣🤣😂😂 waise gooo work

    • @ShivamSahu-w5x
      @ShivamSahu-w5x 3 дні тому +1

      😂😂😂😂😂

    • @nikhilsinha5864
      @nikhilsinha5864 3 дні тому +1

      Bhai unko ghar aake pta chalta hai ki jo research paper fake fake ke podcast me bata rahe the vo fake tha

  • @jaybhavani8416
    @jaybhavani8416 День тому

    🧘
    We expect discussion on
    Aadhidaivic - Adhyatmic
    gyaan - vigyaan - vidya
    &
    Tony Nadder , America
    🪔

  • @AcousticGalaxy
    @AcousticGalaxy 6 годин тому

    Science ko le ke itni chakbodia India mai ho hoti hai sirf 😂 dusre countries mai log naye naye researches kr rahe hai aur india mai OM=MC² 😂 bencho harr chiz mai spirituality ghusana hai yaha logo ko

  • @unknownx983
    @unknownx983 3 дні тому

    You can understand e=mc²
    If yiu just read 9th's NCERT physics and chemistry

  • @ArjunA-ln3ov
    @ArjunA-ln3ov 3 дні тому

    All of this should just be dismissed using basic common sense

  • @saurabhshukla6335
    @saurabhshukla6335 3 дні тому

    मैं आपस १०० % सहमत हु , कुछ pseudoscience वालो ने बहुत झूठे प्रचार किया है , मैं भी इनके झूठ को समझता हु, आप मुझसे बात जरूर करना भाई

  • @iRonSide_610
    @iRonSide_610 2 дні тому

    Aaj kal log kisi bhi mysterious happening ko yeh man lete h ki woh bhagwan ke wajah se h 😂😂
    Abe bhai hum kya h universe ke saamne,50-60 saal bad hum sb mr jayene, magar human civilization jb tak h inventions and discoveries hote rhenge, aur yeh myths debunked hote rhenge.
    Anything that's in discussion and you don't know the reason of that's just because we haven't been able to discover it yet, and surely will do in faaaar future. Tum abhi zinda ho iska mtlb yeh nhi tumhe maut se pehle sab kuch dikh jayega, saare mystery jaan loge.
    Toh sb kuch God ka daan maanna bndh kro. Bss bhagwan pe viswas rkho and koi galat kaam na kro.