Since my mom passed in 2015, I've become deeply steeped in astrology. I've found, western astrology need's more spiritual sides, and Vedic need's more western (mechanical) influences. When you put the 2 together, corrected, you get (fire) a sharp sharp astro analysis. Validating video guy's! Nice work! thank you! 👍✨ 😁
Hi jimmy, I notice you have a personal spark with astrology, please check out my favorite teacher of astrology simon vorster, he will give you the understandings you are looking for.
Love you guys. I am realizing that ultimately, it's not about science and us lay people testing things, but more on finding an enlightened teacher with a lineage. We will always argue over percentages and translations etc. because we are entrenched in the mind. There is a whole other layer we miss. That is the blessing of a guru and the initiation that can illuminate the truth. Astrology is just the tool, so of course they all work!! It's how you use the tool. I think spending an equal amount of time on yourself- the vessel - is just as important.
I’ve had several popular Sidereal Vedic astrologers read my chart. A few of them told me the same thing: that I can’t live outside my home country, especially once I enter a particular Mahadasha. I’ve entered that Mahadasha and here I am, still living outside my home country (I’ve lived outside my home country for a combined total of 20 years now). The Tropical chart has proven to be more accurate in my case.
This is so wonderfully open minded and adventurous. Each of these guys are experts with deep and wide complete knowledge and are willing to reconsider how to serve truth to and through humanity. While their far beyond my knowledge my take away is that Astrology will benefit from computerized collections of charts.
you probably dont give a damn but does anyone know of a trick to get back into an Instagram account?? I stupidly forgot the account password. I appreciate any tips you can give me
I just came here from KRS channel. He had mentioned Ernst Wilhelm in his video and I was searching for d60 explanations... This is a very interesting discussion and changes the way you look at charts.. I never gave much importance to rashi dashas before ,I have always looked at vimshotttari but yea now I will try with rashi centered ones.. Edited to add, no one's birth time is perfect it might be off by 20 or 30 minutes making a huge difference in divisional chart calculations and the true strength of the planets hence predicting all the events in one's life is not possible.1:17:22 yea I am at that point right now..The way you explained swadharma is so beautiful..
I personally found earnst's ideas and way of calculating the chart by mixing nakshtras and tropical zodiac really helpful. If it weren't for his chart calculator, I would've given up on astrology for not being the level of accuracy I want. Very excellent job mate. I seriously look forward to whatever you guys are upto in the field of astrology. Really appreciate earnst for standing his ground.
Hey Ryan, love your videos. Do you use the same Dasha calculations on the Tropical chart that you would for Vedic? Eg. in Vedic my Rahu Dasha began on Jan 4, 2020, would it be the same for the tropical chart even though my Rahu may be in a different house and/or sign?
Excellent interview! I knew, when I saw the intro, that I would be seeing my teacher's face! haha! Lot's of really good information here! Thanks for making this interview possible and sharing it!
Great video. Thanks for the fascinating discussion. There seems to be an underlying presupposition that astrology must be a science like physics or math and therefore only one zodiac an be the correct one. My own view, like that of Geoffrey Cornelius, is that astrology is a divinatory art and is an alternate way of knowing about the universe. It is not surprising, then, that a randomly chosen ayanamsa works as well as Lahiri with most astrological techniques. There also seems to be an Aristotelian presupposition that something cannot be and not be simultaneously. This belief caused scientists no end of difficulty in coming to terms with the fact that light can exist as both a wave and a particle. When they realized that light could both be and not be a wave or a particle, the path was opened for the development of quantum physics. My point is that the search for the "correct" zodiac is probably doomed to failure. What the tropical zodiac has going for it is that its starting point is universeally agreed upon. The Nakshatra wheel has a more ambiguous starting point, so there is a great deal of discretion in choosing where to begin the first Nakshatra, which will then produce different results in the various astrological techniques that depend on the Nakshatra frame of reference.
Thanks for this video. Shows how difficult it is for professionals to agree on the zodiac, even considering all the "research". I have been thinking: Can the sexual revelations/allegations that are coming out over the past month be seen as Saturn moving over the gandanta point in Scorpio (Sidereal).? I cannot seem to justify this using tropical astrology. Is there a way to justify this using Tropical zodiac?
It sounds like the real difference between "new" techniques and the "traditional" ones is the understanding of the degree to which astrology is predominantly a quantitative or qualitative method. The traditional astrologers and the technique they deploy rely more on instinct, judgment, art of synthesis etc that's not really quantifiable. But traditional astrologers can also be known to be extremely accurate with prediction etc but they don't really quantify the data. So it comes down to if you want to believe astrology is like the art of reading a person, or more like astronomical science in its post-scientific-revolution sense.
totally agree, it can't be both. My chart, and even planet conjunctions change between zodiacs, there's no way it's giving the sae reading between tropical+sidereaal/lahiri. (ex: in tropical I have sun-mercury-venus conjunct, and saturn-ketu are conjunct. In sidereal, only mercury/venus are conjunct, sun moved and is with mars now. Saturn moves away from ketu and is alone)
Garett E. Each method brings different, but not false results. Check out simon vorster youtube. He can show you how the entire zodiac interacts with you and why. :) thanks
Thank you guys for making vidoes on such a cintroversial topic. If people are true seekers they wouldn't be offended with different points of view. That being said it would have been great if you guys did a conparative analysis rather than simply saying everytinr Tropical worked better. Atleast one example on the number of children would convince us all. So right now its just your word. I TRUST that word because both of you are Gurus. But we need to see evidence before we come to a conclusion. That's how science works.
Among so many really interesting things, I just heard something that called my attention: "Dharma INSTINCTS". Each time I come to this video I hear something that strikes me (in a positive way I mean).
@Ernst Wilhelm Since you assign so much importance to the process of adopting a scientific methodology, why don't you publish your findings?If you haven't yet, then how is one supposed to examine your hypothesis that a tropical sign system works better than sidereal? And how is one supposed to trust your intention of making techniques work on both the Zodiacs?
Ray Natasha yes it does, any method of zodiac is true in its own way, If you wish to really understand yourself inside the zodiac, please check out my fav youtuber simonvorster
Here's some thoughts if you go into this more in the future, please consider them seriously. A big flaw in his original test, which even he says didn't prove much and the percentages were close, is accurate birth time and close lagnas. For this a human being as a check is quite useful, as well as the fact that it's impossible to read a chart without the D9 at an absolute bare minimum ( particularly when you speak of "sva dharma" like at the end of this talk). Random people off the internet giving their times, who knows what you'll get and anyone whose practiced astrology will know this. Also where is his original research? What are the exact percentages? Where is this research published? Or if he can predict height to a half inch, why not write up a paper on it showing it in both systems? This should be simple, so why has no one done it, yet you engage in constant debates based on ideas. If you put a fraction of the energy into showing an actual comparison, maybe this debate would move somewhere. There is a thing called peer review in proper research, not sure why this is glossed over so much here..Also, Ernst rips into a certain persons Jaimini version, yet note that the author he chooses not to mention ( obvious though if your well read enough) does not put all his knowledge in his books, so what do you expect? All the answers to be laid out in a pithy book? None of the ancient scriptures did this and many contain purposeful errors, yet continuously remind one that nothing can be had without a guru for a reason. However Ernst then goes off on his own tangent and "added rules" when comparing bodies with Ryan using the trimshamsha? Where's that rule coming from? And then he has some interesting interpretations of what the D60 is. Where's he come up with this stuff? Seriously, has Ernst ever had a living teacher for any significant amount of time? I'm not being cross here, but these are legitimate questions if you folks are claiming astrology is a "perfect" science. Is anything in creation prefect? Not here to say what I or what anyone else does is better than the other, but seriously not much here to go off of and I was really hoping for a serious talk about actual research. It's just more "i see my technique works better" or " it's too complicated to show you" like many other astrologers out there. I've been following this conversation for years with an open mind, but you folks have produced almost nothing substantial in the realm of any of this and this, and prefer banning people from your channel when they ask real questions. Here's someone with some actual research pedigree doing work in this realm if you want some ideas for more legitimate "science": www.keplerquiz.com/findings.html .
Ramani Bharatam hi there Frank. I actually interviewed Renay yesterday. Her video will be coming up in about two weeks. We reference that Kepler quiz paper too.
Naturally Amplified, seriously let me know if you want to put your Jyotish where your keyboard is and look at some charts, otherwise just more of the same from you as well. For the record I've listened/read to plenty of books/audio by both Ernst and Ryan over here, I've even seen some private readings from people who consulted with some of them - though I'll stop here on that point other than to say you've added little to moving this conversation forward and still waiting to see something more solid.
Neither you nor Ryan have addressed any of the legitimate questions I bring up here ( i.e. where's the actual research?). You'll have to forgive me, but if someone can't even pronounce Parashara or Jaimini correctly, what else are they missing? And I have had an open mind with all this, even tested it myself quite a bit for some years- and don't see it working. I've also engaged with a handful of people in this camp to show me techniques or explain their reasoning and it always falls quite flat, or I get kicked off some group, or I hear the same tired old debates and arguments keep coming up in conversations like these without any solid comparisons being shown. My chart is a perfect test chart too, as I have five planets moving from 6th house Aries to 7th house Taurus in tropical. It's basically night and day. Just based on our interchange do you think I have an exalted Moon/Venus in the 7th house or Sun exalted/Mars in the 6th? Seriously now. If you'd like to, I'd love to take it over to personal message and we can throw up some blind charts together to make some predictions and test things out. It should be pretty clear if your system is as accurate/profound as you claim it is. What do you say?
@Naturally Amplified: Do you mean to say that spending the last 20 years(bringing astrology to the 21st century) means that a person is on the right track and is presenting the actual facts??
@Naturally Amplified: Do you mean to say that spending the last 20 years(bringing astrology to the 21st century) means that a person is on the right track and is presenting the actual facts??
Astrology is as much a science as psychology is a science. Astronomy and mathematics are sciences. But astrology is much more than astronomy and maths. This does not make astrology (or even psychology) any less enjoyable (or even meaningful) but declarations of astrology being a science is irritating, nonsensical and counter productive.
To be technical, any form or method of understanding your reality is to be called science. And each one has its own truth. Siderial, vedic or evoulutionary atrology, they all tell a similar strory. I would stop serching for perfect exact meaning or equation and focus on your individual truth. That is what any zodiac is forl. UNDERSTANDING YOUR REALATIVE TRUTH.
Angela - The more valid question is - What do you know about science, the scientific method and notions of scientific rigour Interesting though flawed article - theconversation.com/some-people-think-astrology-is-a-science-heres-why-28642
Monica - Umm no. Science and the scientific method is well established and one cannot apply the term 'science' without observing the scientific rules. This is not to say astrology has no merit. There is much meaning in the insights gleaned through the astrological 'method'. But to say it is a science is a bridge too far. I have both of Ryan's books and enjoy them very much but I do wish he just named them 'The Art of Vedic Astrology' :)
m mtl I dont think so. You should define science before asking what is know about it. Known about what? You havent defined it. Science is a physical means of understanding the multiverse. The Wop and the Woof. All science is valid. If it is in fact SCIENCE. Any reality is true I believe.
m mtl iv done my best to give a good opinion. At this point the discussion could go any way. I suggest you simplify all that jazz you're talking about. science Is a way of understanding physical reality yes?
@@CarminaAmza research methodology is less to do about statistical testing and more about model and theory development. Since Ernst's personal bias to tropical, his research would not be even VALID because of lack of 3rd party or peer evaluation owing to subjectivity of his methods and tools in questionnaire responses.As far as I am concerned, Ernst is as floaty as Santos, only difference is he speaks and talks a lot about techniques but NOTHING IN ACTION!
Since my mom passed in 2015, I've become deeply steeped in astrology. I've found, western astrology need's more spiritual sides, and Vedic need's more western (mechanical) influences. When you put the 2 together, corrected, you get (fire) a sharp sharp astro analysis. Validating video guy's! Nice work! thank you! 👍✨ 😁
Hi jimmy, I notice you have a personal spark with astrology, please check out my favorite teacher of astrology simon vorster, he will give you the understandings you are looking for.
I know this is 2 years ago but where can I go to get a chart done that has Tropical and Vedic combined
A modern day Sage Ernst Wilhelm Great video
you are one more ignorant in your land of infinite ignorants!! Let Christ bless your ignorance by thrashing you with the karmic laws!!
Christ is an awareness that is one with all things ... Evolve
Two of my favourite astrologers ever! It's truly an honour to listen to you :)
; )
This is amazing and a utube clip for posterity. Genius in Action!
Thank you Ernst for speaking about this sensitive subject, and thank you Ryan for your active participation. Great material.
you are one more ignorant in your land of infinite ignorants!! Let Christ bless your ignorance by thrashing you with the karmic laws!!
Thank you for your perspective - I take into consideration every ones thoughts and opinions. Sending you blessings.
god bless you guys...thank you for working so hard for benefit of all :)
Love you guys. I am realizing that ultimately, it's not about science and us lay people testing things, but more on finding an enlightened teacher with a lineage. We will always argue over percentages and translations etc. because we are entrenched in the mind. There is a whole other layer we miss. That is the blessing of a guru and the initiation that can illuminate the truth. Astrology is just the tool, so of course they all work!! It's how you use the tool. I think spending an equal amount of time on yourself- the vessel - is just as important.
He's delved as deep as one could
Its a blessing to have him on the planet
I’ve had several popular Sidereal Vedic astrologers read my chart. A few of them told me the same thing: that I can’t live outside my home country, especially once I enter a particular Mahadasha. I’ve entered that Mahadasha and here I am, still living outside my home country (I’ve lived outside my home country for a combined total of 20 years now). The Tropical chart has proven to be more accurate in my case.
This is so wonderfully open minded and adventurous. Each of these guys are experts with deep and wide complete knowledge and are willing to reconsider how to serve truth to and through humanity.
While their far beyond my knowledge my take away is that Astrology will benefit from computerized collections of charts.
I've only recently started studying astrology (tropical). I found this so interesting - thank you! :)
you probably dont give a damn but does anyone know of a trick to get back into an Instagram account??
I stupidly forgot the account password. I appreciate any tips you can give me
@Baylor Jacob Instablaster :)
I just came here from KRS channel. He had mentioned Ernst Wilhelm in his video and I was searching for d60 explanations... This is a very interesting discussion and changes the way you look at charts.. I never gave much importance to rashi dashas before ,I have always looked at vimshotttari but yea now I will try with rashi centered ones.. Edited to add, no one's birth time is perfect it might be off by 20 or 30 minutes making a huge difference in divisional chart calculations and the true strength of the planets hence predicting all the events in one's life is not possible.1:17:22 yea I am at that point right now..The way you explained swadharma is so beautiful..
Great interview! Very objective and analytical. Go Ernst!
; )
I personally found earnst's ideas and way of calculating the chart by mixing nakshtras and tropical zodiac really helpful. If it weren't for his chart calculator, I would've given up on astrology for not being the level of accuracy I want. Very excellent job mate. I seriously look forward to whatever you guys are upto in the field of astrology. Really appreciate earnst for standing his ground.
Watching this video I hoped it will never end :)
It looks like a Charlie Chaplin movie with this filter. It is a Saturn thing, to like old, antique stuff ; )
Hey Ryan, love your videos. Do you use the same Dasha calculations on the Tropical chart that you would for Vedic? Eg. in Vedic my Rahu Dasha began on Jan 4, 2020, would it be the same for the tropical chart even though my Rahu may be in a different house and/or sign?
Excellent interview! I knew, when I saw the intro, that I would be seeing my teacher's face! haha! Lot's of really good information here! Thanks for making this interview possible and sharing it!
God is a Long con, too right lol. Excellent discussion, would love to know more about dharma yogas.
Ryan please change the name of the video, it's only when I opened it up that I realized that ernst and you are together talking on the subject.
Great video. Thanks for the fascinating discussion. There seems to be an underlying presupposition that astrology must be a science like physics or math and therefore only one zodiac an be the correct one. My own view, like that of Geoffrey Cornelius, is that astrology is a divinatory art and is an alternate way of knowing about the universe. It is not surprising, then, that a randomly chosen ayanamsa works as well as Lahiri with most astrological techniques. There also seems to be an Aristotelian presupposition that something cannot be and not be simultaneously. This belief caused scientists no end of difficulty in coming to terms with the fact that light can exist as both a wave and a particle. When they realized that light could both be and not be a wave or a particle, the path was opened for the development of quantum physics. My point is that the search for the "correct" zodiac is probably doomed to failure. What the tropical zodiac has going for it is that its starting point is universeally agreed upon. The Nakshatra wheel has a more ambiguous starting point, so there is a great deal of discretion in choosing where to begin the first Nakshatra, which will then produce different results in the various astrological techniques that depend on the Nakshatra frame of reference.
Wonderful.
Great Video! Thanks. Please, please do the video about Dharma, Kama, Artha and Moksha Yogas!
Ernst has those classes on astrology-videos.com :)
would love to know more about dharma / arta / kama / moksha yogas plz thx!
Join the apprenticeship program! We cover it at the end of year 2.
Thanks for this video. Shows how difficult it is for professionals to agree on the zodiac, even considering all the "research".
I have been thinking: Can the sexual revelations/allegations that are coming out over the past month be seen as Saturn moving over the gandanta point in Scorpio (Sidereal).? I cannot seem to justify this using tropical astrology. Is there a way to justify this using Tropical zodiac?
Can we test the Rasi of the Lagna also? Which is a good test I think
It sounds like the real difference between "new" techniques and the "traditional" ones is the understanding of the degree to which astrology is predominantly a quantitative or qualitative method. The traditional astrologers and the technique they deploy rely more on instinct, judgment, art of synthesis etc that's not really quantifiable. But traditional astrologers can also be known to be extremely accurate with prediction etc but they don't really quantify the data. So it comes down to if you want to believe astrology is like the art of reading a person, or more like astronomical science in its post-scientific-revolution sense.
Ryan: Would you like to talk about Techniques?
Ernst: YASSSSSSSSSS!!!
totally agree, it can't be both. My chart, and even planet conjunctions change between zodiacs, there's no way it's giving the sae reading between tropical+sidereaal/lahiri. (ex: in tropical I have sun-mercury-venus conjunct, and saturn-ketu are conjunct. In sidereal, only mercury/venus are conjunct, sun moved and is with mars now. Saturn moves away from ketu and is alone)
Garett E. Each method brings different, but not false results. Check out simon vorster youtube. He can show you how the entire zodiac interacts with you and why. :) thanks
Very intersting thank you so much!
Using astrology to direct each other to be optimally inner and inter dependent.
Thank you guys for making vidoes on such a cintroversial topic. If people are true seekers they wouldn't be offended with different points of view.
That being said it would have been great if you guys did a conparative analysis rather than simply saying everytinr Tropical worked better. Atleast one example on the number of children would convince us all.
So right now its just your word. I TRUST that word because both of you are Gurus. But we need to see evidence before we come to a conclusion. That's how science works.
Thanks.
Among so many really interesting things, I just heard something that called my attention: "Dharma INSTINCTS". Each time I come to this video I hear something that strikes me (in a positive way I mean).
Think what’s needed is we all need to pool resources and fund the right astrologers doing deep research. The jury is still out there it seems.
@Ernst Wilhelm Since you assign so much importance to the process of adopting a scientific methodology, why don't you publish your findings?If you haven't yet, then how is one supposed to examine your hypothesis that a tropical sign system works better than sidereal? And how is one supposed to trust your intention of making techniques work on both the Zodiacs?
Amazing
it would be cool to run the test again with todays technology
!
So did the test ever get run again ?
Gold.
Please post the link to Devaprashna????
More D60 please ..
What is d musical instrument that has been used in the beginning music?
Jaya Srivastava that would be an octave mandolin.
Ryan Kurczak have you played that?
Why he use the techiniques of vedic astrology in the tropical chart? does it make sense? I'm new here...
Ray Natasha yes it does, any method of zodiac is true in its own way, If you wish to really understand yourself inside the zodiac, please check out my fav youtuber simonvorster
This is the video where Ernst talks about Dharma Yogas: ua-cam.com/video/UOBOFdJ2bCM/v-deo.html
Amazinggg wow!!!
"I'll stop there" :)
You missed it. Jyotish is not just about "technics". It is all about realised knowledge or vijnana.
Here's some thoughts if you go into this more in the future, please consider them seriously. A big flaw in his original test, which even he says didn't prove much and the percentages were close, is accurate birth time and close lagnas. For this a human being as a check is quite useful, as well as the fact that it's impossible to read a chart without the D9 at an absolute bare minimum ( particularly when you speak of "sva dharma" like at the end of this talk). Random people off the internet giving their times, who knows what you'll get and anyone whose practiced astrology will know this. Also where is his original research? What are the exact percentages? Where is this research published? Or if he can predict height to a half inch, why not write up a paper on it showing it in both systems? This should be simple, so why has no one done it, yet you engage in constant debates based on ideas. If you put a fraction of the energy into showing an actual comparison, maybe this debate would move somewhere. There is a thing called peer review in proper research, not sure why this is glossed over so much here..Also, Ernst rips into a certain persons Jaimini version, yet note that the author he chooses not to mention ( obvious though if your well read enough) does not put all his knowledge in his books, so what do you expect? All the answers to be laid out in a pithy book? None of the ancient scriptures did this and many contain purposeful errors, yet continuously remind one that nothing can be had without a guru for a reason. However Ernst then goes off on his own tangent and "added rules" when comparing bodies with Ryan using the trimshamsha? Where's that rule coming from? And then he has some interesting interpretations of what the D60 is. Where's he come up with this stuff? Seriously, has Ernst ever had a living teacher for any significant amount of time? I'm not being cross here, but these are legitimate questions if you folks are claiming astrology is a "perfect" science. Is anything in creation prefect? Not here to say what I or what anyone else does is better than the other, but seriously not much here to go off of and I was really hoping for a serious talk about actual research. It's just more "i see my technique works better" or " it's too complicated to show you" like many other astrologers out there. I've been following this conversation for years with an open mind, but you folks have produced almost nothing substantial in the realm of any of this and this, and prefer banning people from your channel when they ask real questions. Here's someone with some actual research pedigree doing work in this realm if you want some ideas for more legitimate "science": www.keplerquiz.com/findings.html .
Ramani Bharatam hi there Frank. I actually interviewed Renay yesterday. Her video will be coming up in about two weeks. We reference that Kepler quiz paper too.
Naturally Amplified, seriously let me know if you want to put your Jyotish where your keyboard is and look at some charts, otherwise just more of the same from you as well. For the record I've listened/read to plenty of books/audio by both Ernst and Ryan over here, I've even seen some private readings from people who consulted with some of them - though I'll stop here on that point other than to say you've added little to moving this conversation forward and still waiting to see something more solid.
Neither you nor Ryan have addressed any of the legitimate questions I bring up here ( i.e. where's the actual research?). You'll have to forgive me, but if someone can't even pronounce Parashara or Jaimini correctly, what else are they missing? And I have had an open mind with all this, even tested it myself quite a bit for some years- and don't see it working. I've also engaged with a handful of people in this camp to show me techniques or explain their reasoning and it always falls quite flat, or I get kicked off some group, or I hear the same tired old debates and arguments keep coming up in conversations like these without any solid comparisons being shown. My chart is a perfect test chart too, as I have five planets moving from 6th house Aries to 7th house Taurus in tropical. It's basically night and day. Just based on our interchange do you think I have an exalted Moon/Venus in the 7th house or Sun exalted/Mars in the 6th? Seriously now. If you'd like to, I'd love to take it over to personal message and we can throw up some blind charts together to make some predictions and test things out. It should be pretty clear if your system is as accurate/profound as you claim it is. What do you say?
@Naturally Amplified: Do you mean to say that spending the last 20 years(bringing astrology to the 21st century) means that a person is on the right track and is presenting the actual facts??
@Naturally Amplified: Do you mean to say that spending the last 20 years(bringing astrology to the 21st century) means that a person is on the right track and is presenting the actual facts??
Virgos ... God help us!
Exactly.
bust up them paradigm's AVA
Twilight Zone Astrology
Astrology is as much a science as psychology is a science. Astronomy and mathematics are sciences. But astrology is much more than astronomy and maths. This does not make astrology (or even psychology) any less enjoyable (or even meaningful) but declarations of astrology being a science is irritating, nonsensical and counter productive.
To be technical, any form or method of understanding your reality is to be called science. And each one has its own truth. Siderial, vedic or evoulutionary atrology, they all tell a similar strory. I would stop serching for perfect exact meaning or equation and focus on your individual truth. That is what any zodiac is forl. UNDERSTANDING YOUR REALATIVE TRUTH.
Angela - The more valid question is - What do you know about science, the scientific method and notions of scientific rigour
Interesting though flawed article - theconversation.com/some-people-think-astrology-is-a-science-heres-why-28642
Monica - Umm no. Science and the scientific method is well established and one cannot apply the term 'science' without observing the scientific rules. This is not to say astrology has no merit. There is much meaning in the insights gleaned through the astrological 'method'. But to say it is a science is a bridge too far. I have both of Ryan's books and enjoy them very much but I do wish he just named them 'The Art of Vedic Astrology' :)
m mtl I dont think so. You should define science before asking what is know about it. Known about what? You havent defined it. Science is a physical means of understanding the multiverse. The Wop and the Woof. All science is valid. If it is in fact SCIENCE. Any reality is true I believe.
m mtl iv done my best to give a good opinion. At this point the discussion could go any way. I suggest you simplify all that jazz you're talking about. science Is a way of understanding physical reality yes?
Santos Bonacci has a better look at it ,,,
but does he have the statistical evidence to back it up?
@@CarminaAmza research methodology is less to do about statistical testing and more about model and theory development. Since Ernst's personal bias to tropical, his research would not be even VALID because of lack of 3rd party or peer evaluation owing to subjectivity of his methods and tools in questionnaire responses.As far as I am concerned, Ernst is as floaty as Santos, only difference is he speaks and talks a lot about techniques but NOTHING IN ACTION!
Both of these men are thoroughly confused.
ua-cam.com/video/ZQgYn23Xvck/v-deo.html
Led zepplin ay
Thanks ;)
sheer wastage of time!!