Richard D or u just play warlock xD tbh warrior/warlock/druide got sooooo strong anti aggro cards its okey if aggro got some chance ^^' priest on the other hand gets cucked
Because the bigger the deck, the better the chance of getting married? And Kibler usually has a bigger deck than his aggro-opponents. But not as big as Trump with his dead man´s hand making it bigger.
Dude Paladin is insanely grindy, especially if you build it extra-greedy like Kibler's opponent did here. I think a lot of people mistakenly think it's an aggro deck; it's not. It's a value-heavy midrange deck, much like Spiteful Priest, it's just that it also has access to broken OP cards like Call to Arms which allow it to make fast tempo plays a deck with that much value shouldn't really be able to.
If argent squire is so good, why doesn't every deck run it? Personally, I'd rather have a 3/3 1 drop than a 1/1 divine shield to hit my opponent in the face. Plus, argent squire can only be buffed to a 2/2 or a 3/2 with wolf, murlocs can easily hit 4-6 attack with other murloc cards.
Lol, I don't know where you get the idea that you can have a 3/3 1 drop on turn 1. I'm talking about Righteous Protector and Lost in the Jungle. If you think righteous protector is the same as argent squire, think again. People don't run argent because it's useless in the mid-late game. Righteous protector on the other hand protects important cards such as knife juggler and steward to allow paladin to snowball completely out of control. Yeh, murlocs can snowball out of control too, but they are too reliant on the two major cards (tide caller and war leader). It's very easy to disable a murloc army. Hence why you see way more dude paladin, than murloc paladin.
Hero power before playing Crystal Lion. Hit with Vine Cleaver, Hero power for 2 mana, Level up for 5 mana. Crystal Lion costs one less (3) for a total of 10 mana and enemy gets three 3/3 taunts. He still wouldn't have been able to go through the taunts though.
El Bandito I hate cards that punish you for playing the game a certain way. Don’t play a deck that just throws out a bunch out crap? Well then here’s a card that refills your opponents hand for doing so
El Bandito Divine Favour really isn't broken, it can be played around and it can suck a lot too. The game absolutely should have cards that punish different play styles to encourage deck diversity. Now Call to Arms, that card is busted and good pretty much all the time against any deck and in any paladin deck.
The Chair Consec and Wrathammer do completely different things though, HoW is just a 4 mana Frostbolt while Consec clears the board combos with Pyro if you have to
I think he is refering to the 1 hp thing. If consec is good for when your opponent is at 1 hp, hammer of wrath does even more burst. Except that is not how the game works which is the point of the analogy. The reason why consecration works for you is in no way showcased in this game, since it is to counter aggro decks, not control/combo decks. therefore... This is not why every Paladin should run consecration.
On the Wing that's what I thought. I was tempted to play Gather into hopefully Dragonlord, swing with Razor and then execute Dragonlord for double sleepy Dragon. But that would have been a 1/4 Ysera which would also lose the game.
nani? what do you do when they refuse to follow your orders then? Ask them nicely to go and die for you? You need a way to make clear examples of desserters.
Legend Stuff and plays like a very fun deck. Especially when you pull victories out of your ass by recruiting grom/charged devilsaurs + inner rage+ sudden genesis.
Opponent misplays at 5:34 He should have traded in the stegodon instead of the plant, since he was gonna tarim afterwards anyhow. That costed him 2 damage, and since kibler was at 1hp for a long time, probably also the game. Edit: I was completely wrong, it wouldnt have mattered :')
To add a bit of history to it, it comes from Artosis, an early hearthstone player and caster, who would reference the paladin hero power as summoning a dude or putting a dude on the board. Since he casted a good amount of the beginning hearthstone events it was wide spread amongst the early hearthstone community to refer to the silver hand recruits as "dudes" and any deck that specialized in putting a lot of them on the field and/or buffing them has been referred to as a dude deck. Where as a zoo deck is from mtg where playing a lot of cheap efficient minions was referred to as a zoo deck.
yep so you make dudes with lost in the jungle, upgraded hero power, vine cleaver. Literally there need to be one more dude maker in the new set to replace stand against darkness
Ngọc Lê Viết weak? Did you not see the constant flooding that paladin did on the board? Or the fact hes able to draw 4+ cards from a 3 cost card? AND flood the board again after that card draw
Lmao kibler shouldnt have won that game, so many misplays and one teched in equality/consecration or even poison adapt or leeroy would've costed the game
Lmao kibler shouldnt have won that game, so many misplays and one teched in equality/consecration or even poison adapt or leeroy would've costed the game
It's crazy how the Paladin can just flood the board every turn. The amount of AOE removal you need to compete with that deck is ridiculous.
Richard D or u just play warlock xD tbh warrior/warlock/druide got sooooo strong anti aggro cards its okey if aggro got some chance ^^' priest on the other hand gets cucked
Imagine how epic this match would look if it wasn't a card game - just waves after waves of soldiers trying to battle the huge beasts.
axelwarriorvs does that make thee paladin the good guy in this fight?
jsamue12 id see it as more the dragons defending their territory against the recruits
Send wave after wave of your own men at them.
gimmethegepgun Was that a Futurama reference?
It would be in true spirit of warcraft - no good guys or bad guys, just different interests
Dude, I really love your big and massive *DECK*
Kibler does have a legendary *DECK*
Why do you think he's married
what does that have to do with the conversation. we're talking about a deck here.
Because the bigger the deck, the better the chance of getting married?
And Kibler usually has a bigger deck than his aggro-opponents. But not as big as Trump with his dead man´s hand making it bigger.
Scary that the Paladin deck almost won even though the game lasted so long...
Dude Paladin is insanely grindy, especially if you build it extra-greedy like Kibler's opponent did here. I think a lot of people mistakenly think it's an aggro deck; it's not. It's a value-heavy midrange deck, much like Spiteful Priest, it's just that it also has access to broken OP cards like Call to Arms which allow it to make fast tempo plays a deck with that much value shouldn't really be able to.
That's the whole point of dude paladin, you give up early game power (compared to murlocs) but you gain a lot more reload.
+Dlesar Except you don't with 2 of the best 1 drops in the game.
If argent squire is so good, why doesn't every deck run it?
Personally, I'd rather have a 3/3 1 drop than a 1/1 divine shield to hit my opponent in the face. Plus, argent squire can only be buffed to a 2/2 or a 3/2 with wolf, murlocs can easily hit 4-6 attack with other murloc cards.
Lol, I don't know where you get the idea that you can have a 3/3 1 drop on turn 1. I'm talking about Righteous Protector and Lost in the Jungle. If you think righteous protector is the same as argent squire, think again. People don't run argent because it's useless in the mid-late game. Righteous protector on the other hand protects important cards such as knife juggler and steward to allow paladin to snowball completely out of control.
Yeh, murlocs can snowball out of control too, but they are too reliant on the two major cards (tide caller and war leader). It's very easy to disable a murloc army. Hence why you see way more dude paladin, than murloc paladin.
7:10 missplay, enemy could have had 1 3/3 taunt more
level up left him with 1 mana, hero power costs 2, he couldn't
Hero power before playing Crystal Lion. Hit with Vine Cleaver, Hero power for 2 mana, Level up for 5 mana. Crystal Lion costs one less (3) for a total of 10 mana and enemy gets three 3/3 taunts.
He still wouldn't have been able to go through the taunts though.
Howel Bane 4 - 1 = 4 🤔 hmmm
Words cannot express how broken Divine Favor is.
El Bandito I hate cards that punish you for playing the game a certain way. Don’t play a deck that just throws out a bunch out crap? Well then here’s a card that refills your opponents hand for doing so
Except if you survive their crap they die in fatigue 18 turns faster
Call to Arms can.
El Bandito Divine Favour really isn't broken, it can be played around and it can suck a lot too. The game absolutely should have cards that punish different play styles to encourage deck diversity. Now Call to Arms, that card is busted and good pretty much all the time against any deck and in any paladin deck.
They can. Team 5 hasn't bothered to nerf it for years now.
Was lowkey expecting a consecration from that guy tbh
I was expecting equality from out of nowhere lmao
This is why every paladin should always run consecration
squalltheonly I teched in Consec into my dude pally just for the sake of aggro matchups and it has worked wonders
The Chair Consec and Wrathammer do completely different things though, HoW is just a 4 mana Frostbolt while Consec clears the board combos with Pyro if you have to
I think he is refering to the 1 hp thing. If consec is good for when your opponent is at 1 hp, hammer of wrath does even more burst. Except that is not how the game works which is the point of the analogy. The reason why consecration works for you is in no way showcased in this game, since it is to counter aggro decks, not control/combo decks.
therefore... This is not why every Paladin should run consecration.
The Lich King Ohhhh okay, I was thinking he meant consec in general
His reaction in the end is the same as mine every time I fight a paladin
Lucky he didn't have a spellbreaker for the taunts
On the Wing that's what I thought. I was tempted to play Gather into hopefully Dragonlord, swing with Razor and then execute Dragonlord for double sleepy Dragon. But that would have been a 1/4 Ysera which would also lose the game.
+What would BoJack do you can't Execute your own minions
nani?
what do you do when they refuse to follow your orders then?
Ask them nicely to go and die for you?
You need a way to make clear examples of desserters.
On the Wing o
That Execute decision at the end is why Kibler is better than I am.
What background song? Sounds quite nice!
_I'M STAAAYYYYYING ALIIIIIVEEEEEEE_ - Kibler, Brian (2018)
why not primordial (or even sleepy dragon) instead of brawl when deathwing was out??
Love your vids can’t stop watching them!!! Killer could you tell me at what time you stream that would be nice! Thanks!
Recruit warrior looks like a very fun deck
Legend Stuff You know what would make it even better? RAFAAM, THE SUPREME ARCHAEOLOGIST!
Wait, no he wouldn’t
Rafaam would be fun if it was "Recruit a minion and trigger it's battle cry" but that would be completely broken
Legend Stuff and plays like a very fun deck. Especially when you pull victories out of your ass by recruiting grom/charged devilsaurs + inner rage+ sudden genesis.
So satisfying to beat tempo mages... I make sure to bm all the time with this deck
best hearthstone youtuber/streamer ever
Opponent misplays at 5:34 He should have traded in the stegodon instead of the plant, since he was gonna tarim afterwards anyhow. That costed him 2 damage, and since kibler was at 1hp for a long time, probably also the game.
Edit: I was completely wrong, it wouldnt have mattered :')
kamikazekoenful how would that change anything ?
It doesn’t matter what he trades, the result is the same
Dig that rounders reference
Stayin' alive like the Bee Gees.
what tracker is he using? does somebody know?
For some reason the maximum quality is only 720p guys.
Kibler we love you so much! Maybe we'll see someday something else than Hearthstone? Other than that amazing work
Wow thats was amazing game play
Idk why but it sound like something is wrong with the audio
True, it is possible that Natalie messed something while editing
Being drunk while working, what could go wrong?!
Being a jerk while living, what could go wrong?
Amusingly enough i'm accompanied with beer quite often when i code. No gf btw }:
This music reminds me of tales of Symphonia
Just clean! dude
why is it that warlock decks with many little minions is called "zoo warlock" but in paladin its "dude paladin"
Lara İpek silver hand recruits are called dudes often, so when you play cards that summon many of them its a dude deck
To add a bit of history to it, it comes from Artosis, an early hearthstone player and caster, who would reference the paladin hero power as summoning a dude or putting a dude on the board. Since he casted a good amount of the beginning hearthstone events it was wide spread amongst the early hearthstone community to refer to the silver hand recruits as "dudes" and any deck that specialized in putting a lot of them on the field and/or buffing them has been referred to as a dude deck. Where as a zoo deck is from mtg where playing a lot of cheap efficient minions was referred to as a zoo deck.
The more you know! Thanks for the info :D
Michael Izquierdo thanks Michael!
At 3:34 Kibler definitely would've been in a better spot if he played woecleaver and attacked, instead of playing gather your party + armor up.
1 HP win...WOW!
Kibler! Llanowar Elves is getting a reprint! Glorybringer is a good dragon! Please come home!
First time around: 3 mana, draw five.
Second time around: 3 mana, draw four.
Seems balanced.
how did kibler get so lucky that the paladin had neither equality OR spellbreaker lol, he needed one of either to just straight up win.
If that one goblin had not die, you wouta lose.
Keep the eggplants coming
It's times like this where I wish Paladin had an Aoe Buff that wasn't Tarim, like mark of the lotus.
level up
kaifeiyu that doesn't affect minions other than recruits.
yep so you make dudes with lost in the jungle, upgraded hero power, vine cleaver. Literally there need to be one more dude maker in the new set to replace stand against darkness
Holy crap you're /already/ legend? :OOOO
yeah him and 5k others =P, not as bad with the new rank system you don't get pushed back to rank 15
The game audio is just non existent now
I almost stop breathing...
Cancer Dudepala is real.
Seemed to me like maybe he should have played sleepy dragon after deathwing instead of the brawl
For khaz modan
What is with the deal with all the eggplants @_@
dalton barries
Its a metaphor for Brian’s big, MASSIVE, *deck* by the editor (his wife)
These plays..... I like kibler but these plays 😂
#ClutchKibler
"recruit paladin?" I don't think he even played call to arms that game...
Patrick Keeley Silver Hand Recruits
notification squaaaaad
Pre 1080p squad
They run consencrate
i farted
Number 8
Damn, that paladin was bad... some legend-tier misplays there
Hello there
Notif squad! :)
Look Blizzard, DudePala is so weak. Give him more heal, more clear, more draw, or anything allow him defeat Control warrior.
control warrior? that deck was recruit warrior...
Ngọc Lê Viết weak? Did you not see the constant flooding that paladin did on the board? Or the fact hes able to draw 4+ cards from a 3 cost card? AND flood the board again after that card draw
+DaBalugi you can't tell when people are sarcastic, don't you? here, let me help you - he was sarcastic.
You got me, thank you =))
So many missplays lmao
Second 🌚
Lmao kibler shouldnt have won that game, so many misplays and one teched in equality/consecration or even poison adapt or leeroy would've costed the game
First!!!
Woke lever
Are you colour blind brian?
yes, he is
he said that in one of videos where he played kazakus deck of some kind
Hi Kibs
Lmao kibler shouldnt have won that game, so many misplays and one teched in equality/consecration or even poison adapt or leeroy would've costed the game
spellbreaker