Excellent! Information regarding these Alexandrian texts was refuted long ago. We as Protestant Christians knew this, but became complacent in not teaching these truths to following generations. Not remembering our history and the true enemies who seek to dominate all once again. These enemies have always know that their enemy is the word of God, hence the fakes, which remove the divinity of Jesus, that He is the only way by which we may be saved and who reveals the true character of the Father. Thank you for your work brother, may God bless you richly as you continue expose these forgeries.
again, more amazing information that should be more widely known. in all my study of the Bible issue I never came across this stuff until now, but it's so powerful. just like you can't "prove" God to someone who doesn't want to believe, you can't "prove" we have a perfectly preserved Bible in the KJV, but we can prove there are major issues with the pillars and foundations of all modern textual criticism and all modern versions, that cannot be overcome or ignored except by willful blindness and ignoring the evidence itself. this changes everything, they can only pretend they never heard it and compartmentalize it away somewhere never to be considered again. hopefully people will have the intellectual honesty to think about the evidence and it's implications and question the reason for their unjustified bias.
Dear Brother David, Your love for the TRUTH is so much of a blessing! The BIBLE matters more than anything else in this life. Folks just need to see that AV 1611 as the uncorrectable TEXT of Psalms 12:6-7. The problem addressed in 1 Timothy 6:10 is illustrated so vividly by religious complex. We pray for you as a fellow brother in Christ Jesus. SW
David, I am so grateful for this video. I have been reading my KJV Bible for 3 months now, and the Lord used you in a profound way. I thank the Lord for showing you these truths. I too am now witnessing to others about the trustworthiness of the KJV. After 24 years of apologetics/textual critical studies, I became confused about which Bible to read. My library was so full of different versions that I couldn't decide which Bible to take to church on Sunday. The Lord had been speaking to me for years, but I became hardened by KJVO people and their rude behavior. The gentleness and respect that you have shown has been deciding point for me. The more I listened to your message and researched the issues you brought to light, the more convinced I became. I will never turn my back to the pure word of God ever again! Blessings to you David. In Jesus always, Pastor Brett
I started a personal research study for myself around 1 & a 1/2 to 2 years ago about what manuscripts & Bibles are behind the Traditional Text and the Critical text. It didn't take me very long to find out that the Critical text "scholars" (support modern translations) conveniently don't tell people the whole story about facts. But when I researched so many Traditional Text scholars (support the KJV), that's when I finally discovered all the facts for myself. For me, this video just proves one more time that at least most of the Critical text "scholars" have an agenda which doesn't include supporting any manuscripts, etc., that don't support their own agenda. Their agenda is more important to them than facts & integrity. It sickens me so! Thank you so much David Daniels for another one of your scholarly & evidential investigations proving the deliberate corruptions that form the foundation of the modern translations. Comparing the modern translations with the KJV, there are so many key places that prove the deliberate, corrupt changes in the modern translations. Thank you so much for all your research. God bless.
I so appreciate the research provided by David W. Daniels and Chick Tracts! There are many new believers who can make use of this information to grow spiritually, and I am sure the LORD will use the tracts and His truth in Scripture to solidly turn their hearts to the LORD and Savior, Jesus Christ, the Son of God, God incarnate. Praise the LORD! Hallelujah! Amen!
Thank you for this channel! I never took the KJV-only folks seriously, but I was unaware, until this and similar presenters, that underneath it is a mountain of strong evidence that the Majority greek texts are superior to the Critical texts trending in modern seminaries. I look forward to learning more 😃
Enjoyed the thrilling story telling very much. This sounded like a conclusion. Not that you have to stop. I just got that feeling. May our Lord bless and protect Chick Publications and their helpers.
The problem is, even ministers are not being told about the different texts. It is simply portrayed as modern language v archaic language. And I went to an evangelical college in england!
Have you heard of the Haak Bible in English (1645, 1657)? Or maybe the Statenvertaling Bible in Dutch (1630s)? Or maybe the Dort Study Bible (1657 : 2003)? Well this was a bible that was commissioned by the Synod of Dort to create a new Dutch bible. The Synod layed out rules and brought together the greatest scholars in the Western world (many who worked on the KJV and also other men like Diodati (the specialist on Waldensee bibles and scholar who worked under Beza). This bible also had notes and other annotations supporting its translation. It was translated from the original languages and endorsed the KJV textual choices and translations. This is an incredible confirmation of the KJV (and all Reformed translations and texts). Cromwell and the Westminster Divines commissioned Haak to make a translation of this new bible with all the annotations and notes. Haak's English version is now available online. I was looking up some of the usual passages like I John 5.7. I thought you might be interested.
I John 5.7 : Haak Bible (1657) : English Translation of Dutch Bible : Vol 1 & Vol 2 : FREE ONLINE ORIGINALS I John 5.7 : Heavenly Witnesses : Johannine Comma Reel position: Wing / 939:20 I John 5.6-8 6. He it is who came by water and blood, [The Apostle here hath respect to the water and blood which flowed out of the pierced side of Christ, of which John only maketh mention, John 19.34,35. and reherseth the same again here to shew that there is a mystery in it, namely, that from him floweth the water of the Holy Ghost, whereby we are ??cleansed?? and regenerated; and that by the shedding of his blood on the cross is procured for us, reconciliation with God and the forgiveness of our sins. And thereby was fulfilled that which was represented by the Ceremonies of the Old Testament, which consisted mostly in purifications by water, and shedding the blood of beasts which were sacrificed : so that this is the sense, seeing Christ being come hath actually fulfilled all that which was represented by the ceremonies of the Old Testament, that therefore this is a clear proof, that he is the true Messiah] (namely) Jesus the Christ : not by water only, but by water and blood, [that is, he came not only to bring about the benefit of regeneration, or of the cleansing of our corrupt nature, but together also the benefit of justification or reconciliation with God, by his spirit and blood : which two benefits are not separated one from another] and it is the Spirit that testifieth, [that is, the holy spirit testifieth in the hearts of believers. 2 Cor. 1.22 Ephes 1.13] that the Spirit is truth. [that is, the doctrine of the Gospel, that Jesus is the Christ : which doctrine is called Spirit. 2 Cor 3.6 See the annotat. there.] 7. For [This verse seeing it contains a very clear testimony of the holy Trinity, seems to have been left out of some copies by the Arrians, but is found in almost all Greek copies, and even by many ancient and worthy Teachers also, who lived before the times of the Arrians, brought out of them for proof of the holy Trinity : and the opposition of the witnesses upon earth ver. 8. sheweth clearly that this verse must be there; as appears also by the ninth verse, where is spoken of this testimony of God] there are three [namely, persons, and distinctive witnesses] who witness in heaven, [that, is of which may not be doubted of. See Matth. 3.16-17. and chap 17.5. John 3.31 Acts 2.1. &c] the Father, the Word, [that is the Son of God. See John 1.1.] and the Holy Ghost, and these three [namely, persons. See Matth. 3. ver. 16-17 and chap 28.19] are one. [namely, of essence and nature : who testifie of this thing all three together and the same thing. A very clear proof and testimony of the Trinity of persons in the unity of the divine essence. See John 10.30] 8. And there are three [That is, there are also three witnesses on earth, which testifie the same] which testifie upon earth, the Spirit and the water and the blood. [That is, the Spirit of adoption, which is given to believers in the Church here upon earth, and the water of regeneration, by which the faithfull are assured of their fellowship wiht the Father and the Son, and the blood of the New Testament, whereby they obtain forgiveness of their sins, and reconciliation with God, Others by the Spirit understand the doctrine of the Gospel, and by water, the Sacrament of baptism, and three means, the faithfull in the Church here on earth, as by three firm witnesses, are assured of the forgiveness of their sins by Christ, and of eternal life. See also the annotat. on ver. 6.] and they three (come) to one. [that of testimony thereof, namely, that Jesus is the Saviour and the Son of God, ver. 5.] == WorldCat Record: >>worldcat.org/oclc/606650775 Early English Books Link: >>eebo.chadwyck.com/search/full_rec?SOURCE=pgimages.cfg&ACTION=ByID&ID=V61806 Title: The Dutch annotations upon the whole Bible, or, All the holy canonical scriptures of the Old and New Testament together with, and according to their own translation of all the text, as both the one and the other were ordered and appointed by the Synod of Dort, 1618 and published by authority, 1618 and published by authority, 1637, now faithfully communicated to the use of Great Britain, in English : whereunto is prefixed an exact narrative touching the whole work, and this translation / by Theodore Haak ... Additional titles: Bible. Author: Haak, Theodore, 1605-1690. Imprint: London : Printed by Henry Hills, for John Rothwell, Joshua Kirton, and Richard Tomlins, 1657. Date: 1657 Bib name / number: Wing / H162 Physical description: [1918] p. Notes: Reproduction of original in University of Illinois Library. This is actually a translation of the Bible, not annotations. Copy from: University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign Campus) UMI Collection / reel number: Wing / 939:20 Subject: Bible -- Criticism, interpretation, etc. == Cromwell: >>godutch.com/newspaper/index.php?id=170 Dort Study Bible: >>frcna.org/messenger/item/9055-/9055- Statenvertaling Bible: >>statenvertaling.net/english.html
Alexander Lennox are you kidding me? James White teaches works, denies God preserved His word and leads people to hell. He also changes the bible. James has been doing that for years. If he were a child of God, God would have taken him home as chastisement by now.
bible4truth to be fair, Dr. White believes in sanctification after salvation, and that ‘good works’ are a representation of that. Mr. Daniels does not endorse ‘easy-believism or hyper grace, so I would have to assume that Mr. Daniels believes, as do I, that salvation and sanctification cause a person to die in Christ and as a result, exhibit a changed life. Not a perfect one, only God is perfect.
Re: 6:32 -- Kirsopp Lake, in 1910, was still married to his wife Helen. It was not till much later that he divorced her, and married Silva, a former student.
Just a question @ 18:38 is a tattered text, what text is this? I missed it even going back over it still uncertain; it could not be Siniaticus right as it was a pristine book page by page white or aged pages.
I first read the worst version ever of the Bible in my own language. When I jumped to the King James Bible, my doctrine didn't change at all but it got reaffirmed. All those other versions weaken the Word of God, but they cannot fool a Holy Spirit filled believer. They are trying to mock God but God cannot be mocked.
Christ said about blind teachers leading blinds...thank you for helping us to open our eyes to light...there is no worst blind than who that chooses darkness.....
There is a true text, the Textus Receptus, The Received Text. there is a false text, the alexandrinus texts. on judgment day, God won't be interested in modern scholars excuses and whining. Truth Act 5:32 And we are his witnesses of these things; and so is also the Holy Ghost, whom God hath given to them that obey him. Joh 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you. Joh 16:13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come. 1Co 2:10 But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God. 1Co 2:11 For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God. 1Co 2:12 Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God. 1Co 2:13 Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual. 1Co 2:14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. 1Co 12:7 But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal. 1Jn 2:27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him. Lies Pro 6:16 These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him: Pro 6:17 A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, Pro 6:18 An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief, Pro 6:19 A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren. Pro 12:22 Lying lips are abomination to the LORD: but they that deal truly are his delight Joh 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. Rev 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death. Scholars are all about their beloved alphabet soup after their names and all the recognition they can get, recognition/fame equals more money and high class life style., they will have all eternity to weep and wail over their worldly choices and where it got them in the end.
Keep up the good work David, These so called scholars hate the KJV and God will preserve his words. Lies and counterfeits is what they are good at. That is until they go under the microscope. Lord Bless You.
*Sacred Scriptures as Trash: Biblical Papyri from Oxyrhynchus* by AnneMarie Luijendijk Princeton University, Department of Religion, 1879 Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA *Abstract:* Most New Testament papyri with a known provenance were found at the site of the ancient Egyptian city of Oxyrhynchus, or more precisely: on that city’s rubbish mounds. The fact that sacred scriptures were discarded as garbage is surprising in view of the holiness of Christian biblical manuscripts, intrinsically and physically. Yet the trash aspect of provenance has never been adequately problematized or studied. Taking a social-historical and garbological approach, this article demonstrates that at Oxyrhynchus in antiquity entire manuscripts with biblical writings were deliberately discarded by Christians themselves, unrelated to persecution and issues of canonicity. *==* AnneMarie Luijendijk, "Sacred Scriptures as Trash:Biblical Papyri from Oxyrhynchus," Vigiliae Christianae 64.3 (2010): 217-254. >>drive.google.com/open?id=0B-bzizBlqdFmRVVRM1daREFwMnc
hi Daniel! I've just read your book "Babylon Religion" - totally loved it. And I've just found out only the KJV is the word of God. I feel like I need to make a lot of changes ie. Throw away my nice leather NIV bible which I loved, no longer visiting Catholic churches whenever I travelled to Europe, which I used to do all the time, lighting candles and prayed to the idols Jesus. THANKS for letting us know all these, keep up the good work:)
If it only has yahushua that it's true anything with Jesus would be a fake because the letter j was created 500 years ago and you can never change the anointed son's name it would all be fraud is the letter j does not exist in the Greek or Hebrew aeromic language
Hold the phone!!! Greek Codex 2427, 11:27 Okay. But wait. 11:29 What if they had found a really ancient manuscript 11:34 and copied it? Wouldn't that be the same 11:37 as if it was made in 1300? Isn't a copy 11:41 of an ancient copy of Mark just as good as an ancient copy?? We who are supporters of the KJV also rely on copies, as we are pretty sure no originals exist. Below are references courtesy of Dr. Gene Kim. The original 10 commandments were on the stone that God had prepared, well Moses in his anger broke them, so Moses had to hew new stone and God wrote them again with His finger, it was a copy of the original. Deu_17:18 And it shall be, when he sitteth upon the throne of his kingdom, that he shall write him a copy of this law in a book out of that which is before the priests the Levites: Jos_8:32 And he wrote there upon the stones a copy of the law of Moses, which he wrote in the presence of the children of Israel. Ezr_4:11 This is the copy of the letter that they sent unto him, even unto Artaxerxes the king; Thy servants the men on this side the river, and at such a time. Jer 36:22 Now the king sat in the winterhouse in the ninth month: and there was a fire on the hearth burning before him. Jer 36:23 And it came to pass, that when Jehudi had read three or four leaves, he cut it with the penknife, and cast it into the fire that was on the hearth, until all the roll was consumed in the fire that was on the hearth. Jer 36:27 Then the word of the LORD came to Jeremiah, after that the king had burned the roll, and the words which Baruch wrote at the mouth of Jeremiah, saying, Jer 36:28 Take thee again another roll, and write in it all the former words that were in the first roll, which Jehoiakim the king of Judah hath burned. Jer 36:32 Then took Jeremiah another roll, and gave it to Baruch the scribe, the son of Neriah; who wrote therein from the mouth of Jeremiah all the words of the book which Jehoiakim king of Judah had burned in the fire: and there were added besides unto them many like words. The first scroll was burned, so a second scroll was made a copy of the first scroll with all the same words and more like words added. Luk 4:17 And there was delivered unto him the book of the prophet Esaias. And when he had opened the book, he found the place where it was written, Luk 4:21 And he began to say unto them, This day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears. Act 8:27 And he arose and went: and, behold, a man of Ethiopia, an eunuch of great authority under Candace queen of the Ethiopians, who had the charge of all her treasure, and had come to Jerusalem for to worship, Act 8:28 Was returning, and sitting in his chariot read Esaias the prophet. Act 8:32 The place of the scripture which he read was this, He was led as a sheep to the slaughter; and like a lamb dumb before his shearer, so opened he not his mouth: 2Ti 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 2Ti 3:17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works. Jesus read from the book of Esaias and said This day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears. A eunuch of Ethiopia, was reading the book of Esaias, The place of the scripture, Both Jesus and the Ethiopian read from the book of Esaias and in both places it was called Scripture!!! At least on of those books had to be a copy, I looked and Isaiah was about 700 years before Jesus, while it might have been possible for the original book of Isaiah to last that long, if it was read a lot and it would have been read to pieces long before Jesus day, so that both books of Esaias were copies, copies that were called SCRIPTURE!!!
Where is book of genesis I only saw a few verses in codec sinacticus, is book of genesis in codec vulgate. But codex vaticanis you said not made till 1864 .Anyone know. And how old then is your king James version
WTF? You're completely confused and uninformed. No one cites authorship of vaticanus is as late as the 1860's - it is acknowledged by everyone that provenance runs to the 13th century when it was "discovered" at the Vatican. And if you're referring to Sinaiticus, the most frequently cited date range among those who claim it to be a latter day forgery is anywhere from 1839 to 1844. So....get your facts straight before you embarass yourself further.
David, I trust the source material for the KJV over anything from Rome. You believe that the translation was divinely inspired? If so could you please explain the word choice in the following verse. Act_12:4 And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people. Easter G3957 G3957 πάσχα pascha pas'-khah Of Chaldee origin (compare [H6453]); the Passover (the meal, the day, the festival or the special sacrifices connected with it): - Easter, Passover. Pascha is used 29 times, but only once is it Easter instead of Passover. Why? No Apostle ever observed Easter. Easter (Ishtar) was brought into Christianity by Rome.
Acts12:1 shows it's Herod (an Idumean pagan) Acts 12:3 says days of unleavened bread (which is after Passover in Leviticus 23) Pascha can mean both Easter and Passover, but because of verse 3, it has to mean Easter. Herod was waiting for the pagan festival to be done before he deals with Peter.
The washington codex adds more to mark than any other book but you dont mention it because it disproves your nervous rant. The syriac codex also leaves out the rising from the dead part but you want to stick to your believed version. We dont need fslse teachings, just present all sides. Dont jump to conclusions first and then bias the argument to your conclusions. That doesnt work any more.
Sorry to say This, But l think codex is mispelled(Kotex,) la the name for a piece of cloth that tries to cover blood!!!*****, O you can Not Cover the Blood of Christ Jesus, with a piece of papyrus,!!!*****, Fact is the Blood of Christ Jesus Covers all things in heaven, earth and all Sinners lniquity!!!*****, lf We Repent and endure to the End,!!!*****)
You are just proving to me more and more to not trust Marks gospel. Shoot I don’t trust Luke’s gospel nor any of Paul’s letters cause Paul continues to prove to be a liar and contradicting his own words. Plus Luke and Mark are Paul’s own disciples. So now you make me more to not trust it at all.
Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths. Proverbs 3:5,6
@@anonnnnnsh the Vatican corrupted the Bible and took out many books. You can do some research and see what the Romans did on your own time. You can also look at the first few pages of your Bible depending the translation. NIV states that 25% of written scriptural material are Missing. ESV is 50% missing written material. We are missing a lot of information. Yahuwah is still King there’s no denying that.
@@anonnnnnsh I know about the 1611 KJV and that is why I said the translations we have now we don’t have everything cause cause of missing material and missing books. The 1611 has the apocrypha in it which are historical books. And people wonder why there’s a gap between the Prophets and Matthew..? It’s because the Romans didn’t want the people to know their history especially what had happened with the Maccabean war. To the Hebrew Israelite, the Romans took away their culture and identity away and introduce them to pagan gods. learn about the so called Alexander the Great from the Greek Empire. And learn how the Romans took over the lands defeating Alexander.
Excellent! Information regarding these Alexandrian texts was refuted long ago. We as Protestant Christians knew this, but became complacent in not teaching these truths to following generations. Not remembering our history and the true enemies who seek to dominate all once again. These enemies have always know that their enemy is the word of God, hence the fakes, which remove the divinity of Jesus, that He is the only way by which we may be saved and who reveals the true character of the Father.
Thank you for your work brother, may God bless you richly as you continue expose these forgeries.
again, more amazing information that should be more widely known. in all my study of the Bible issue I never came across this stuff until now, but it's so powerful. just like you can't "prove" God to someone who doesn't want to believe, you can't "prove" we have a perfectly preserved Bible in the KJV, but we can prove there are major issues with the pillars and foundations of all modern textual criticism and all modern versions, that cannot be overcome or ignored except by willful blindness and ignoring the evidence itself. this changes everything, they can only pretend they never heard it and compartmentalize it away somewhere never to be considered again. hopefully people will have the intellectual honesty to think about the evidence and it's implications and question the reason for their unjustified bias.
Artcore103 when we have the kjv we can prove many things
Dear Brother David, Your love for the TRUTH is so much of a blessing! The BIBLE matters more than anything else in this life. Folks just need to see that AV 1611 as the uncorrectable TEXT of Psalms 12:6-7. The problem addressed in 1 Timothy 6:10 is illustrated so vividly by religious complex. We pray for you as a fellow brother in Christ Jesus. SW
David,
I am so grateful for this video. I have been reading my KJV Bible for 3 months now, and the Lord used you in a profound way. I thank the Lord for showing you these truths. I too am now witnessing to others about the trustworthiness of the KJV. After 24 years of apologetics/textual critical studies, I became confused about which Bible to read. My library was so full of different versions that I couldn't decide which Bible to take to church on Sunday. The Lord had been speaking to me for years, but I became hardened by KJVO people and their rude behavior. The gentleness and respect that you have shown has been deciding point for me. The more I listened to your message and researched the issues you brought to light, the more convinced I became. I will never turn my back to the pure word of God ever again! Blessings to you David.
In Jesus always,
Pastor Brett
Pastor Brett Praise Jesus!
I started a personal research study for myself around 1 & a 1/2 to 2 years ago about what manuscripts & Bibles are behind the Traditional Text and the Critical text. It didn't take me very long to find out that the Critical text "scholars" (support modern translations) conveniently don't tell people the whole story about facts. But when I researched so many Traditional Text scholars (support the KJV), that's when I finally discovered all the facts for myself.
For me, this video just proves one more time that at least most of the Critical text "scholars" have an agenda which doesn't include supporting any manuscripts, etc., that don't support their own agenda. Their agenda is more important to them than facts & integrity. It sickens me so!
Thank you so much David Daniels for another one of your scholarly & evidential investigations proving the deliberate corruptions that form the foundation of the modern translations. Comparing the modern translations with the KJV, there are so many key places that prove the deliberate, corrupt changes in the modern translations. Thank you so much for all your research. God bless.
I so appreciate the research provided by David W. Daniels and Chick Tracts! There are many new believers who can make use of this information to grow spiritually, and I am sure the LORD will use the tracts and His truth in Scripture to solidly turn their hearts to the LORD and Savior, Jesus Christ, the Son of God, God incarnate.
Praise the LORD! Hallelujah! Amen!
Thank you brother. long ago, when i got a RSV, i wondered why it had to replace the KJV. now, all these years later, i know.
Thank you for this channel! I never took the KJV-only folks seriously, but I was unaware, until this and similar presenters, that underneath it is a mountain of strong evidence that the Majority greek texts are superior to the Critical texts trending in modern seminaries.
I look forward to learning more 😃
Enjoyed the thrilling story telling very much. This sounded like a conclusion. Not that you have to stop. I just got that feeling. May our Lord bless and protect Chick Publications and their helpers.
The problem is, even ministers are not being told about the different texts. It is simply portrayed as modern language v archaic language. And I went to an evangelical college in england!
They are peer-pressured to agree with their teachers and "experts."
excellent detective work!!!
Brother,
I wanted to share this with you.
Courage and Godspeed
Have you heard of the Haak Bible in English (1645, 1657)?
Or maybe the Statenvertaling Bible in Dutch (1630s)?
Or maybe the Dort Study Bible (1657 : 2003)?
Well this was a bible that was commissioned by the Synod of Dort to create a new Dutch bible. The Synod layed out rules and brought together the greatest scholars in the Western world (many who worked on the KJV and also other men like Diodati (the specialist on Waldensee bibles and scholar who worked under Beza). This bible also had notes and other annotations supporting its translation. It was translated from the original languages and endorsed the KJV textual choices and translations. This is an incredible confirmation of the KJV (and all Reformed translations and texts). Cromwell and the Westminster Divines commissioned Haak to make a translation of this new bible with all the annotations and notes. Haak's English version is now available online. I was looking up some of the usual passages like I John 5.7. I thought you might be interested.
I John 5.7 : Haak Bible (1657) : English Translation of Dutch Bible : Vol 1 & Vol 2 : FREE ONLINE ORIGINALS
I John 5.7 : Heavenly Witnesses : Johannine Comma
Reel position: Wing / 939:20
I John 5.6-8
6. He it is who came by water and blood, [The Apostle here hath respect to the water and blood which flowed out of the pierced side of Christ, of which John only maketh mention, John 19.34,35. and reherseth the same again here to shew that there is a mystery in it, namely, that from him floweth the water of the Holy Ghost, whereby we are ??cleansed?? and regenerated; and that by the shedding of his blood on the cross is procured for us, reconciliation with God and the forgiveness of our sins. And thereby was fulfilled that which was represented by the Ceremonies of the Old Testament, which consisted mostly in purifications by water, and shedding the blood of beasts which were sacrificed : so that this is the sense, seeing Christ being come hath actually fulfilled all that which was represented by the ceremonies of the Old Testament, that therefore this is a clear proof, that he is the true Messiah] (namely) Jesus the Christ : not by water only, but by water and blood, [that is, he came not only to bring about the benefit of regeneration, or of the cleansing of our corrupt nature, but together also the benefit of justification or reconciliation with God, by his spirit and blood : which two benefits are not separated one from another] and it is the Spirit that testifieth, [that is, the holy spirit testifieth in the hearts of believers. 2 Cor. 1.22 Ephes 1.13] that the Spirit is truth. [that is, the doctrine of the Gospel, that Jesus is the Christ : which doctrine is called Spirit. 2 Cor 3.6 See the annotat. there.]
7. For [This verse seeing it contains a very clear testimony of the holy Trinity, seems to have been left out of some copies by the Arrians, but is found in almost all Greek copies, and even by many ancient and worthy Teachers also, who lived before the times of the Arrians, brought out of them for proof of the holy Trinity : and the opposition of the witnesses upon earth ver. 8. sheweth clearly that this verse must be there; as appears also by the ninth verse, where is spoken of this testimony of God] there are three [namely, persons, and distinctive witnesses] who witness in heaven, [that, is of which may not be doubted of. See Matth. 3.16-17. and chap 17.5. John 3.31 Acts 2.1. &c] the Father, the Word, [that is the Son of God. See John 1.1.] and the Holy Ghost, and these three [namely, persons. See Matth. 3. ver. 16-17 and chap 28.19] are one. [namely, of essence and nature : who testifie of this thing all three together and the same thing. A very clear proof and testimony of the Trinity of persons in the unity of the divine essence. See John 10.30]
8. And there are three [That is, there are also three witnesses on earth, which testifie the same] which testifie upon earth, the Spirit and the water and the blood. [That is, the Spirit of adoption, which is given to believers in the Church here upon earth, and the water of regeneration, by which the faithfull are assured of their fellowship wiht the Father and the Son, and the blood of the New Testament, whereby they obtain forgiveness of their sins, and reconciliation with God, Others by the Spirit understand the doctrine of the Gospel, and by water, the Sacrament of baptism, and three means, the faithfull in the Church here on earth, as by three firm witnesses, are assured of the forgiveness of their sins by Christ, and of eternal life. See also the annotat. on ver. 6.] and they three (come) to one. [that of testimony thereof, namely, that Jesus is the Saviour and the Son of God, ver. 5.]
==
WorldCat Record: >>worldcat.org/oclc/606650775
Early English Books Link: >>eebo.chadwyck.com/search/full_rec?SOURCE=pgimages.cfg&ACTION=ByID&ID=V61806
Title: The Dutch annotations upon the whole Bible, or, All the holy canonical scriptures of the Old and New Testament together with, and according to their own translation of all the text, as both the one and the other were ordered and appointed by the Synod of Dort, 1618 and published by authority, 1618 and published by authority, 1637, now faithfully communicated to the use of Great Britain, in English : whereunto is prefixed an exact narrative touching the whole work, and this translation / by Theodore Haak ...
Additional titles: Bible.
Author: Haak, Theodore, 1605-1690.
Imprint: London : Printed by Henry Hills, for John Rothwell, Joshua Kirton, and Richard Tomlins, 1657.
Date: 1657
Bib name / number: Wing / H162
Physical description: [1918] p.
Notes: Reproduction of original in University of Illinois Library.
This is actually a translation of the Bible, not annotations.
Copy from: University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign Campus)
UMI Collection / reel number: Wing / 939:20
Subject: Bible -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
==
Cromwell: >>godutch.com/newspaper/index.php?id=170
Dort Study Bible: >>frcna.org/messenger/item/9055-/9055-
Statenvertaling Bible: >>statenvertaling.net/english.html
Thank you bro., nice work!
Greg Cox wish we have more people within our ranks like this !
Yep! The devil has James White and God gave us Brother Daniels! Great stuff...thank you!
I just wish, that fake James White can debate brother Daniel
Alexander Lennox are you kidding me? James White teaches works, denies God preserved His word and leads people to hell. He also changes the bible. James has been doing that for years. If he were a child of God, God would have taken him home as chastisement by now.
bible4truth to be fair, Dr. White believes in sanctification after salvation, and that ‘good works’ are a representation of that. Mr. Daniels does not endorse ‘easy-believism or hyper grace, so I would have to assume that Mr. Daniels believes, as do I, that salvation and sanctification cause a person to die in Christ and as a result, exhibit a changed life. Not a perfect one, only God is perfect.
@@bible4truth
Yes. I know of someone personally - a pastor - that happened to. We should all be aware of this type of thing.
Great video. Glad to see someone seriously review and research the question of text.
Re: 6:32 -- Kirsopp Lake, in 1910, was still married to his wife Helen. It was not till much later that he divorced her, and married Silva, a former student.
Just a question @ 18:38 is a tattered text, what text is this? I missed it even going back over it still uncertain; it could not be Siniaticus right as it was a pristine book page by page white or aged pages.
Man, You've got my attention. The truth will find you out.
Re: 19:03 -- Who are these people who, you claim, stated that Tischendorf changed the MS and "aged it, to make it look older"??
I first read the worst version ever of the Bible in my own language. When I jumped to the King James Bible, my doctrine didn't change at all but it got reaffirmed. All those other versions weaken the Word of God, but they cannot fool a Holy Spirit filled believer. They are trying to mock God but God cannot be mocked.
Thank you so much. Another great video and so helpful for me personally.
In all Orthodox Churches we use the Majority text of New Testament and for the Old Testament most of the local churches use the Septuagint
4:12 Why does St Mark have an iPad in this image?
Christ said about blind teachers leading blinds...thank you for helping us to open our eyes to light...there is no worst blind than who that chooses darkness.....
Excellent series honestly!
There is a true text, the Textus Receptus, The Received Text. there is a false text, the alexandrinus texts. on judgment day, God won't be interested in modern scholars excuses and whining.
Truth
Act 5:32 And we are his witnesses of these things; and so is also the Holy Ghost, whom God hath given to them that obey him.
Joh 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
Joh 16:13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.
1Co 2:10 But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God.
1Co 2:11 For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.
1Co 2:12 Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God.
1Co 2:13 Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.
1Co 2:14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
1Co 12:7 But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal.
1Jn 2:27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.
Lies
Pro 6:16 These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:
Pro 6:17 A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,
Pro 6:18 An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief,
Pro 6:19 A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.
Pro 12:22 Lying lips are abomination to the LORD: but they that deal truly are his delight
Joh 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
Rev 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
Scholars are all about their beloved alphabet soup after their names and all the recognition they can get, recognition/fame equals more money and high class life style., they will have all eternity to weep and wail over their worldly choices and where it got them in the end.
Good comment.
Keep up the good work David, These so called scholars hate the KJV and God will preserve his words. Lies and counterfeits is what they are good at. That is until they go under the microscope.
Lord Bless You.
Hook line and sinker ! This is much better than an Agatha Christi Crime Novel
Just awesome David-keep 'em coming!!
In the Orthodox Church we have always used the Byzantine text NT.
Thank you brother Daniels for your hard work!
you went to fuller?
Outstanding work.
*Sacred Scriptures as Trash: Biblical Papyri from Oxyrhynchus* by AnneMarie Luijendijk
Princeton University, Department of Religion, 1879 Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
*Abstract:* Most New Testament papyri with a known provenance were found at the site of the ancient Egyptian city of Oxyrhynchus, or more precisely: on that city’s rubbish mounds. The fact that sacred scriptures were discarded as garbage is surprising in view of the holiness of Christian biblical manuscripts, intrinsically and physically. Yet the trash aspect of provenance has never been adequately problematized or studied. Taking a social-historical and garbological approach, this article demonstrates that at Oxyrhynchus in antiquity entire manuscripts with biblical writings were deliberately discarded by Christians themselves, unrelated to persecution and issues of canonicity.
*==*
AnneMarie Luijendijk, "Sacred Scriptures as Trash:Biblical Papyri from Oxyrhynchus," Vigiliae Christianae 64.3 (2010): 217-254.
>>drive.google.com/open?id=0B-bzizBlqdFmRVVRM1daREFwMnc
hi Daniel! I've just read your book "Babylon Religion" - totally loved it. And I've just found out only the KJV is the word of God. I feel like I need to make a lot of changes ie. Throw away my nice leather NIV bible which I loved, no longer visiting Catholic churches whenever I travelled to Europe, which I used to do all the time, lighting candles and prayed to the idols Jesus. THANKS for letting us know all these, keep up the good work:)
Well hopefully it said yahushua
If it only has yahushua that it's true anything with Jesus would be a fake because the letter j was created 500 years ago and you can never change the anointed son's name it would all be fraud is the letter j does not exist in the Greek or Hebrew aeromic language
Provenance is the keyword in this whole entire issue. A minister of the word of God should know where his text came from. Pros should know.
I love KJV. Thanks to Kent Hovind about fifteen years ago. Keep up the great work!
Hold the phone!!!
Greek Codex 2427,
11:27
Okay. But wait.
11:29
What if they had found a really ancient manuscript
11:34
and copied it? Wouldn't that be the same
11:37
as if it was made in 1300? Isn't a copy
11:41
of an ancient copy of Mark just as good as an ancient copy??
We who are supporters of the KJV also rely on copies, as we are pretty sure no originals exist.
Below are references courtesy of Dr. Gene Kim.
The original 10 commandments were on the stone that God had prepared, well Moses in his anger broke them, so Moses had to hew new stone and God wrote them again with His finger, it was a copy of the original.
Deu_17:18 And it shall be, when he sitteth upon the throne of his kingdom, that he shall write him a copy of this law in a book out of that which is before the priests the Levites:
Jos_8:32 And he wrote there upon the stones a copy of the law of Moses, which he wrote in the presence of the children of Israel.
Ezr_4:11 This is the copy of the letter that they sent unto him, even unto Artaxerxes the king; Thy servants the men on this side the river, and at such a time.
Jer 36:22 Now the king sat in the winterhouse in the ninth month: and there was a fire on the hearth burning before him.
Jer 36:23 And it came to pass, that when Jehudi had read three or four leaves, he cut it with the penknife, and cast it into the fire that was on the hearth, until all the roll was consumed in the fire that was on the hearth.
Jer 36:27 Then the word of the LORD came to Jeremiah, after that the king had burned the roll, and the words which Baruch wrote at the mouth of Jeremiah, saying,
Jer 36:28 Take thee again another roll, and write in it all the former words that were in the first roll, which Jehoiakim the king of Judah hath burned.
Jer 36:32 Then took Jeremiah another roll, and gave it to Baruch the scribe, the son of Neriah; who wrote therein from the mouth of Jeremiah all the words of the book which Jehoiakim king of Judah had burned in the fire: and there were added besides unto them many like words.
The first scroll was burned, so a second scroll was made a copy of the first scroll with all the same words and more like words added.
Luk 4:17 And there was delivered unto him the book of the prophet Esaias. And when he had opened the book, he found the place where it was written,
Luk 4:21 And he began to say unto them, This day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears.
Act 8:27 And he arose and went: and, behold, a man of Ethiopia, an eunuch of great authority under Candace queen of the Ethiopians, who had the charge of all her treasure, and had come to Jerusalem for to worship,
Act 8:28 Was returning, and sitting in his chariot read Esaias the prophet.
Act 8:32 The place of the scripture which he read was this, He was led as a sheep to the slaughter; and like a lamb dumb before his shearer, so opened he not his mouth:
2Ti 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
2Ti 3:17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.
Jesus read from the book of Esaias and said This day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears.
A eunuch of Ethiopia, was reading the book of Esaias, The place of the scripture,
Both Jesus and the Ethiopian read from the book of Esaias and in both places it was called Scripture!!!
At least on of those books had to be a copy, I looked and Isaiah was about 700 years before Jesus, while it might have been possible for the original book of Isaiah to last that long, if it was read a lot and it would have been read to pieces long before Jesus day, so that both books of Esaias were copies, copies that were called SCRIPTURE!!!
Good work!!.....Hope this ticks off the hairy ticks!!
7 dislikes from James White fans
Where is book of genesis I only saw a few verses in codec sinacticus, is book of genesis in codec vulgate. But codex vaticanis you said not made till 1864 .Anyone know. And how old then is your king James version
WTF? You're completely confused and uninformed. No one cites authorship of vaticanus is as late as the 1860's - it is acknowledged by everyone that provenance runs to the 13th century when it was "discovered" at the Vatican. And if you're referring to Sinaiticus, the most frequently cited date range among those who claim it to be a latter day forgery is anywhere from 1839 to 1844. So....get your facts straight before you embarass yourself further.
Part 12 or 16?
Wow! What a bomb, wow! Amazing.
2:40 Finally, "Hi, I'm David Daniels from Chick Publications."
Good research
A manuscript shouldn't be qualified as inspiration based solely on carbon dating / being an early writing.
God bless you. The Holy Spirit is telling me to read the KJV.
As soon as you said Jesuit I felt a chill.
David,
I trust the source material for the KJV over anything from Rome. You believe that the translation was divinely inspired? If so could you please explain the word choice in the following verse.
Act_12:4 And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people.
Easter G3957
G3957
πάσχα
pascha
pas'-khah
Of Chaldee origin (compare [H6453]); the Passover (the meal, the day, the festival or the special sacrifices connected with it): - Easter, Passover.
Pascha is used 29 times, but only once is it Easter instead of Passover. Why? No Apostle ever observed Easter. Easter (Ishtar) was brought into Christianity by Rome.
I wonder if it was due to Herod being a Roman puppet ruler who built roman pagan temples still seen in Israel today? Not sure though.
Acts12:1 shows it's Herod (an Idumean pagan)
Acts 12:3 says days of unleavened bread (which is after Passover in Leviticus 23)
Pascha can mean both Easter and Passover, but because of verse 3, it has to mean Easter. Herod was waiting for the pagan festival to be done before he deals with Peter.
Excellent!
Keep going.
The washington codex adds more to mark than any other book but you dont mention it because it disproves your nervous rant.
The syriac codex also leaves out the rising from the dead part but you want to stick to your believed version.
We dont need fslse teachings, just present all sides. Dont jump to conclusions first and then bias the argument to your conclusions. That doesnt work any more.
What part of Majority don't you understand?
Eddie a there’s no credibility with a 1 off codex that has no confirming witness codex!
ALL ROADS LEAD TO ROME.
great video thank God for the KJV.
Your KJV is based on manuscripts closer in age to today than to the original source.
Sorry to say This, But l think codex is mispelled(Kotex,) la the name for a piece of cloth that tries to cover blood!!!*****,
O you can Not Cover the Blood of Christ Jesus, with a piece of papyrus,!!!*****, Fact is the Blood of Christ Jesus Covers all things in heaven,
earth and all Sinners lniquity!!!*****, lf We Repent and endure to the End,!!!*****)
You are just proving to me more and more to not trust Marks gospel. Shoot I don’t trust Luke’s gospel nor any of Paul’s letters cause Paul continues to prove to be a liar and contradicting his own words. Plus Luke and Mark are Paul’s own disciples.
So now you make me more to not trust it at all.
Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.
In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths. Proverbs 3:5,6
@@anonnnnnsh the Vatican corrupted the Bible and took out many books. You can do some research and see what the Romans did on your own time. You can also look at the first few pages of your Bible depending the translation. NIV states that 25% of written scriptural material are Missing. ESV is 50% missing written material.
We are missing a lot of information.
Yahuwah is still King there’s no denying that.
@@anonnnnnsh I know about the 1611 KJV and that is why I said the translations we have now we don’t have everything cause cause of missing material and missing books.
The 1611 has the apocrypha in it which are historical books.
And people wonder why there’s a gap between the Prophets and Matthew..? It’s because the Romans didn’t want the people to know their history especially what had happened with the Maccabean war. To the Hebrew Israelite, the Romans took away their culture and identity away and introduce them to pagan gods. learn about the so called Alexander the Great from the Greek Empire. And learn how the Romans took over the lands defeating Alexander.
@@anonnnnnsh we still have 22 missing lost books mentioned in 1 and 2 Kings,
1 and 2 Chronicles.