As soon as he throws the 95% "consensus" on climate change being man made, he disingenuously used "reason" to justify ignoring the many names in science as well as other well-meaning individuals who question the validity of such premise. When 95% of scientists ( hard to prove this number) come to a conclusion, it takes one or two to debunk decades or centuries later and change the course of history. His reasons are also provisional. I hope he accepts that.
As soon as he throws the 95% "consensus" on climate change being man made, he disingenuously used "reason" to justify ignoring the many names in science as well as other well-meaning individuals who question the validity of such premise. When 95% of scientists ( hard to prove this number) come to a conclusion, it takes one or two to debunk decades or centuries later and change the course of history. His reasons are also provisional. I hope he accepts that.