Toast please answer one situation what will happen if you have iceblock and your opponent plays auchenai soulpriest + tree of life? Didn't find it in google and cannot test myself cause - well don't have cards.
Sertac Garipoğlu You can experiment with ideas and they usually have fun Tavern Brawls. It does seem kind of odd to play it because someone you like but don't hang out with plays the game. I'm just nitpicking, don't mind me
Barnes has to be drew before ysharaaj, and both can not be adjacent to each other. Also, ysharaaj can not be draw while barnes hasn't been plaued. So the odds that this combo works is ((7*12+21*22/2)*28!)/30!=21/58~36.2%
I'd like to try this in a Clockwork Card Dealer Tavern Brawl, when your biggest risk is getting Y'Shaarj in the opening hand, and you can reliably draw Barnes on turn 4.
Toast, you lied to me. I deranked from 15 and four stars to 19 and one star before I got a win with this. I knew I should have trusted the cereal bar instead.
A similar deck exists with hunter: You pack in Eaglehorn, traps, and everything which summons a minion+Barnes/Y'shaarj (obviously). Either you win with the Barnes combo or you destroy him with your bow/Call of the Win.
I'm really surpirsed nobody did the math on this but here it goes (This ignores mulligans and assumes you keep the coin to play Barnes. If you go second and you don't keep the coin, the odds of the combo go down significantly because you have to draw an extra card before you hit 4 mana, which means you have an extra chance to draw into Y'shaarj and ruin the combo) (The odds of pulling off the combo increases slightly, assuming you draw into Barnes, when you play druid because of cards like wild growth and innervate, however you will not be able to use gang up to get more copies of Y'shaarj) Barnes is the first card you draw (Odds of first card being Barnes, followed by each card you draw until you can play Barnes NOT being Y'shaarj): 1/30 x 28/29 x 27/28 x 26/27 x 25/26 x 24/25 x 23/24 = 23/870 = 2.6436781609195% Barnes is the second card you draw: 29/30 x 1/29 x 27/28 x 26/27 x 25/26 x 24/25 x 23/24 = 23/840 = 2.67380952380952% Barnes is the third card you draw: 29/30 x 28/29 x 1/28 x 27/28 x 26/27 x 25/26 x 24/25 = 23/810 = 2.8395061728395% Barnes is the fourth card you draw: 29/30 x 28/29 x 27/28 x 1/27 x 25/26 x 24/25 x 23/24 = 23/780 = 2.948717...% Barnes is the fifth card you draw: 29/30 x 28/29 x 27/28 x 26/27 x 1/26 x 24/25 x 23/24 = 23/750 = 3.06666...% Barnes is the sixth card you draw: 29/30 x 28/29 x 26/27 x 25/26 x 1/25 x 23/24 = 23/720 = 3.194444...% Barnes is the seventh card you draw: 29/30 x 28/29 x 27/28 x 26/27 x 25/26 x 24/25 x 1/24 = 23/690 = 3.3333...% Average chances of pulling off the combo: Not good. You would need to have a rouge deck that can win using only spells in order to actually climb ranks, and even then you might not. Sorry guys :/
If Barnes/Yogg doesn't work out you can win by Traps/Bow/Summoned-based-minions or by surviving until Call of the Wild. Playing Hunter works best for this type of deck...
Toast, I think you're doing one thing wrong. If your hand doesn't have y'shaarj in your starting hand, then why do you mulligan cards? That increases the chances of getting y'shaarj for every card u mulligan.
Vonflare but i dont think its worth the risk? the priority is to not have y'shaarj in your hand, because that instantly means that you lose. i only think its worth doing mulligan when barnes is not in your opening hand, because it is your win condition. am i wrong?
Well when you play this kind of deck you're not concerned with winrate and just losing on the spot, if anything you should be used to it. So the chances of getting a barnes, prep, eviscerate, shadow strike etc, is much more in your favour and worth it if you're playing an "All or Nothing" deck :D
The whole point of this is Y'shaarj. Barnes summons a copy of it and the copy summons the original one. Then the original one and the copy will summon the ones you added through gang up. He is basically the key monster. no replacements.
Yeah, this is a combo deck, and Y'shaarj is a key combo card. Replacing combo cards can only be done by cards with an (almost) identical effect. Since Y'shaarj is unique in it's kind of effect, especially in this deck, it is impossible to replace it.
I think this was an inspiration to the Barns/Yshaarj/spells hunter deck that is in the high tier these days , it was frequently used in recent tournaments !
So worst case scenario, no coin, Mulligan all 4, 12 draws total, 4/30 * 4/30 * 1/26 * 1/25 * 1/24 * 1/23 to draw Y'Shaarj Which is a 99.999995045% chance to not draw Y'Shaarj
Zillamon Animu At least learn some combinatorics before posting a comment about math. You computed the complement of not drawing to be drawing all Y’Ahaarj
Thing is boogiemonster is always worse than gruul... well except if you give him windfury but you still have to hit minions for him to grow so even then I'd say it is worse.
If there is a boogiemonster deck, I bet you that it contains faceless manipulators... Hmm I just thought of some funny combo in warrior: Barnes into Boogiemonster into charge+commanding shout. It doesn't seem to have any real viable meaning, but it's sort of a funny way to start his ramping up.
Karsh so like... 9 mana for a 3/1 boogiemonster? xD even if you count barnes stat it's like 9 mana 6/5... waow a 3 card combo that cost 1 mana more than boogiemonster and is worse than boogiemonster.... are you the guy that invented purify?
well, there is a 1 in 4 chance of getting a yshaarj in ur hand, but also 1 in 4 for barnes, after that 7 draw 2 or 3 more cards depending on your side, coin or no, which means you basically have a 30% chance of getting barnes and a 10% chance of getting ysharj... 30 - (10% of 30)= 27% ofc u dont have 30 cards anymore at that point so the chance of drawing them increases, but i dont want to do the math xD too much work. anyways, in the end you have a 26% to 29% chance of pulling it off on turn 3, after that u have a 50/50 chance of pulling it off, 50% of (100 - 27.5) = 36.25% 36.25 + 27.5% = 63.75%.... there is also a chance of your opponent having an answer soooo..... should be about 60% chance.... WAIT!?!? did you do the math already? your (what i assume is a guess) percentage is quite acurate... nice! sadly i need 600 dust more to get a yshaarj xD..... after unoacking 3 antonidas' cards in a row ffs!
I wondered about the pronunciation too, but the WOW wiki says, and I quote, "Pronounced YAH-Sha-Raj"...even though it should clearly be said, "Yuh-Shaarj". :s
Okay 4chan overlord, calling people "newfags". Plus maybe I was referring to how he spelled it in the beginning? why don't you approach someone more carefully to prevent your own point from being wrong.
i actually made this exact (almost) deck the other day, i was in such a rush to just make it and play with it and was quite excited to have the PERFECT hand of (barnes, prep, gang up, coin and a few others i dont remember) by turn three in my FIRST game! i know right? problem was, i played coin barnes, and was freaking out that i only noticed once i ended my turn and nothing was pulled by yshaarj that, in the rush of making the deck, i quickly grabbed yogg instead of yshaarj. actually ended up playing for a while, enough to actually get a yogg, shadowstep into yogg the next turn. still lost though, but was a fun experince of my everlasting stupidity.
I got both legendaries in golden from packs early on. I never realized they can be that fun. Thanks for sharing! I never used both for any deck seriously
I like your edits so much when you say something like "That would never happen". And guess what? It happens a second after you say it. Hahaha love u toast.
This deck can still operate (mostly) as planned if you draw Y'Shaarj before you play Barnes. Just Y'Shaarj, Preparation, Gang Up. And pray that you can keep the board clean for the first 9 turns (or 8 if you have the coin).
I'm surprised how many people have not realized by now that draws in Hearthstone are not entirely random. There is an algorithm in place that almost always puts your highest mana costing card in the top half of your deck. I say almost because there is a very small chance that your highest mana card(s) will be on bottom half. The algorithm also uses card rarity ratio to determine draw chance, as in there is a very high chance of getting a legendary in your starting hand/top half of deck that is even higher the more mana it cost and depends on the number of legendaries in deck as well. Therefor, at the part where you said you had 1 out of 23 chances of getting Y'shaarj was actually closer to 1 out of 8. You can test this algorithm out yourself. The chance of the 10 mana cost legendary card being in top half of deck is higher the bigger the gap is between the 10 cost card and the next lowest man cost. Anyone that has played Hearthstone long enough should of noticed this pattern of almost always getting your highest cost minion in either starting hand or at least in first half of deck. You aren't imagining things. It's an intentional part of the design.
Blake Stanley No, this was tested exstensively, which I was completely unaware of until one day I went searching, plus I noticed it in every Hearthstone streamer/UA-camr I've watched over the past couple years. And it's not rigged exactly because there is still a chance there. The algorithm is just conditional based on factors unseen by the player. I took this research farther and even talked to programmers that all say the same thing, that an algorithm cannot ever truly be random. It's impossible. Algorithms have to be carefully planned and setup based on certain criteria that depends on what the algorithm is for and what the programmer wants to do with it. All a programmer can do is try to give the illusion of randomness the best they can by setting these conditions/criteria that determine the behavior/output of the algorithm. They can create variables, but Hearthstone does not have that many variables to work with. Just card rarity, mana cost, card type, key words on the cards, and I think that's it. Computers cannot generate random numbers, but they can have so many variables that you can never tell it isn't random. Every function is based on an algorithm, and algorithms are never truly random. I've played TCGs/CCGs most of my life and I only noticed these patterns when I play an online TCG/CCG. I never notice them in physical TCG/CCG, which I now of course know why. Shuffling and drawing in a physical TCG/CCG is truly random.
There are a lot of misconceptions about how computer RNGs work in your explanation. First of all, a computer is not limited to the variables of the game to seed the RNG with. It can use the time. Furthermore, every hearthstone game is adjucated by a server. A server can actually produce truly random numbers if it has a built in hardware randomness source.
Disclaimer: Clips were shown in reverse.
Reversed clips were reversed again ;)
Toast can get untoasted confirmed
that explains everything
Toast please answer one situation what will happen if you have iceblock and your opponent plays auchenai soulpriest + tree of life? Didn't find it in google and cannot test myself cause - well don't have cards.
doing stuff like this so soon after getting out of blizzard jail
30% of the time, it works every time
Welcome to humor
this is a reference to anchorman dude
Yeah, I also heard that joke.
That does'nt make sense
Incorrect.
2.5 years later and this is still one of my favorite Toast vids. Also, stroll down memory lane before Toast showed his face.
You say 100% win rate but then that it works 30% of the time...
THAT'S 3000%!!!!!!!
lol
Did you say 300??! THIS IS SPARTA!!
Did you say SPARTA?? This is madness!
um, that's clearly wrong, it's 3000%
3000% actually
Seriously Toast is one of the reasons I play Hearthstone
*only
Only?
What a strange coincidence! Hearthstone is one of the reasons I eat toast!
Dezitron the Derp Lion why would i play broken and pay to win game other than that
Sertac Garipoğlu You can experiment with ideas and they usually have fun Tavern Brawls. It does seem kind of odd to play it because someone you like but don't hang out with plays the game.
I'm just nitpicking, don't mind me
If the clips were shown in reverse that means you went from rank 5 to rank 13 with that deck lol
Thank you Sherlock, you can go to home now.
Thanks. Now I heard the joke 2 times!
actually, it wasn't a 3 mana 73/74 it was a 5 mana 73/74
Which is totally unplayable, way to slow for the current meta. 5 Mana 73/74 pfff..
charge is missing
Still wrong. It was a (3) mana 74/75 Overload (2) per turn for (2) turns and discard (2) cards.
Still wrong. All of the above butt it was a discard two cards throughout two turns and put three y sharks in your deck (with the discard
I think mine is accurate enough without getting too technical. ^
*EVERYONE GET IN HERE.*
You're fucking everywhere
He's singed. That's his JOB.
+Troys50 He's a good roleplayer =D
A SALTY HATRED FILLED, RAGE-QUIT, FIGHT? EMBRACE ME IN!
(I don't know if that works)
Pile on.
Key Cards
Gang Up x2
Barnes X1
Y'Shaarj X1
Rogue spells X26
4:45 "What are the odds? ... 1 in 26 apparently ... I have a math degr--"
LOL
Barnes has to be drew before ysharaaj, and both can not be adjacent to each other. Also, ysharaaj can not be draw while barnes hasn't been plaued. So the odds that this combo works is ((7*12+21*22/2)*28!)/30!=21/58~36.2%
Sorry i did the wrong math, both actually can be adjacent. So the odds is (7*12+22*23/2)*28!/30!=337/870~38.7%
+Jia-Ho Jian 38,7% of the times, works every time. :D
+Jia-Ho Jian Damn you are smart :o
+Jia-Ho Jian sry m8 im really slow but where the fug are you getting these numbers lol
I'd like to try this in a Clockwork Card Dealer Tavern Brawl, when your biggest risk is getting Y'Shaarj in the opening hand, and you can reliably draw Barnes on turn 4.
Toast, you lied to me. I deranked from 15 and four stars to 19 and one star before I got a win with this. I knew I should have trusted the cereal bar instead.
The clips were reversed.. and it 30% of the time, it always works
same to me T T
you lyeing case ya can loose not star rank when 15 i know case i pley allot
this was berfore that update
4:42 Shame on you, forgot to prep the coin.
If I was to try this deck, Barnes would always be the last card
So wait what happens if you don't draw Barnes?
Prep sprint into shiv into another prep sprint (fan of blades is also there). You either get Barnes first (yay win) or Y'Shaarj (damnit, concede)
Press Alt+F4, then proceed to delete system 32.
You won't be able to bring out Y'Shaarj.
In such a case, just hope you don't draw Y'Shaarj before you get Barnes.
A
sup
A similar deck exists with hunter: You pack in Eaglehorn, traps, and everything which summons a minion+Barnes/Y'shaarj (obviously). Either you win with the Barnes combo or you destroy him with your bow/Call of the Win.
Did you know: If you win 100% of your games, you'll probably win a lot of games?
Franco Pulido The more you know!
not if you only play a few games, then you only win a few games
Rodrigo Amaro YOU MUST BE SOME KIND OF GENIOUS
I'm really surpirsed nobody did the math on this but here it goes (This ignores mulligans and assumes you keep the coin to play Barnes. If you go second and you don't keep the coin, the odds of the combo go down significantly because you have to draw an extra card before you hit 4 mana, which means you have an extra chance to draw into Y'shaarj and ruin the combo) (The odds of pulling off the combo increases slightly, assuming you draw into Barnes, when you play druid because of cards like wild growth and innervate, however you will not be able to use gang up to get more copies of Y'shaarj)
Barnes is the first card you draw (Odds of first card being Barnes, followed by each card you draw until you can play Barnes NOT being Y'shaarj):
1/30 x 28/29 x 27/28 x 26/27 x 25/26 x 24/25 x 23/24 = 23/870 = 2.6436781609195%
Barnes is the second card you draw:
29/30 x 1/29 x 27/28 x 26/27 x 25/26 x 24/25 x 23/24 = 23/840 = 2.67380952380952%
Barnes is the third card you draw:
29/30 x 28/29 x 1/28 x 27/28 x 26/27 x 25/26 x 24/25 = 23/810 = 2.8395061728395%
Barnes is the fourth card you draw:
29/30 x 28/29 x 27/28 x 1/27 x 25/26 x 24/25 x 23/24 = 23/780 = 2.948717...%
Barnes is the fifth card you draw:
29/30 x 28/29 x 27/28 x 26/27 x 1/26 x 24/25 x 23/24 = 23/750 = 3.06666...%
Barnes is the sixth card you draw:
29/30 x 28/29 x 26/27 x 25/26 x 1/25 x 23/24 = 23/720 = 3.194444...%
Barnes is the seventh card you draw:
29/30 x 28/29 x 27/28 x 26/27 x 25/26 x 24/25 x 1/24 = 23/690 = 3.3333...%
Average chances of pulling off the combo:
Not good. You would need to have a rouge deck that can win using only spells in order to actually climb ranks, and even then you might not. Sorry guys :/
tfw playing exodia
a shame you seemed a skilled man
Lain?
+Nuclear Bastion, Lain
definitely Lain. Seriously Serial Lain
Weird
Took me a while to realize his only monsters were Yaaj and Barnes.
I call him "Yuh Shardge."
Sup Abelhawk
How you doin'?
Good good. Just working on my next Warcraft 3 Easter egg video.
Sweet! I'm sure I'll enjoy watching it, as usual.
10/10 would watch again
Thanks! If all goes well it should be uploaded by tomorrow, or Saturday at the latest.
That would be great, I'm waiting then.
Be well my Easter God.
12:21 that moment when a piece of toast has music tastes like yours
seriously ? He jumped quickly from Rank 13 to Rank 5 with only this Deck
Clips were shown in reverse. It's a nice fun way to drop 8 ranks.
clips were shown in reverse.
There was a guy who got rank 100 legend playing a hunter variation of the same deck tho
Did he start at rank 1-99 legend?
If Barnes/Yogg doesn't work out you can win by Traps/Bow/Summoned-based-minions or by surviving until Call of the Wild. Playing Hunter works best for this type of deck...
I know im probably late, but toast what is your twitch. I would definitely sub to be a fellow toasterino
twitch.tv/disguisedtoast
It is in the main page of his chanel
www.twitch.tv/disguisedtoasths
Shouldn't you be working? There are Kripp parts I need to skip!
no way this is the realrino kripperino talking 😱
yeah it actually is, look at his sub count
Has Day9 played this deck? I think Day9 needs to play this deck.
But does day9 need to play this deck?
Day9 dropped his pen when he heard about the new Miracle Rogue so I think that's up next.
How many times will Day9 play this deck?
What is Day9 gonna do with this deck?
Y-Sha R J
"Worst case scenario hunters mark, unleash the hounds, I cry myself to sleep."
Toast, I think you're doing one thing wrong. If your hand doesn't have y'shaarj in your starting hand, then why do you mulligan cards? That increases the chances of getting y'shaarj for every card u mulligan.
because it also increases his chances of getting barnes, pep, shadowstep, and/or gang up
Vonflare but i dont think its worth the risk? the priority is to not have y'shaarj in your hand, because that instantly means that you lose. i only think its worth doing mulligan when barnes is not in your opening hand, because it is your win condition. am i wrong?
Well when you play this kind of deck you're not concerned with winrate and just losing on the spot, if anything you should be used to it. So the chances of getting a barnes, prep, eviscerate, shadow strike etc, is much more in your favour and worth it if you're playing an "All or Nothing" deck :D
the anchorman clip at the end alone was worth the watch XD
Why would you mulligan anything if you have the combo in hand? Just increasing your losing chances.
If they ever do a "discover a card from your deck" brawl...
Toast is all over that and a stick of butter.
#NotPay2Win
its just 2 legendaries LUL
And one of which is not even craftable but rather a reward from an adventure which you have to bu... wait to unlock.
Monkey D Luffy So you'd rather pay2win?
bought the expansion with gold, got barnes. Got y'shaarj from a free pack after winning a tavern brawl. Its not pay to win if youre good at the game;)
And have luck.
I came for memes and deck ideas, and got both. Awesome video as always Toast!
Hey Toast, I don't have Y'Shaarj. What can I use to replace him?
blood of the anciet one? rag?
Wisp
The whole point of this is Y'shaarj. Barnes summons a copy of it and the copy summons the original one. Then the original one and the copy will summon the ones you added through gang up. He is basically the key monster. no replacements.
Yeah, this is a combo deck, and Y'shaarj is a key combo card. Replacing combo cards can only be done by cards with an (almost) identical effect. Since Y'shaarj is unique in it's kind of effect, especially in this deck, it is impossible to replace it.
taking bait in 2016 LUL
I think this was an inspiration to the Barns/Yshaarj/spells hunter deck that is in the high tier these days , it was frequently used in recent tournaments !
we should have a new card that return a card from ur hand to the deck.
oh please yes, i've been running a version like this except it's with barnes+brann into blood of ancient one
That would actually be really cool. soemthing like
Name (2)
Battlecry: Choose a card in your hand and shuffle it into your deck.
1/2
If only he could get Dead Man's Hand
Make it a spell, duh o3o
2 mana
Disperse Spirit
Return the most high cost minion from your hand, heal as much as its cost.
I don't know about twitch, but when it comes to youtube, Toast flat out has the best Hearthstone content of anyone. No contest.
yo no rng included
It's like a grim patron only with 10/10's and it works at the end of the trurn.
100% = 30% WOW!!
It may not work often, but when it does it's *glorious*.
Are you feeling it now Mr Krabs HAHAHHAHA
You could name your hunter deck as Guy Ritchie's movie "Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels" as "Trap, Yogg and Two Smoking Bows".
Fun and Interactive
Jesus Christ, That’s Jason Barnes!
So worst case scenario, no coin, Mulligan all 4, 12 draws total, 4/30 * 4/30 * 1/26 * 1/25 * 1/24 * 1/23 to draw Y'Shaarj
Which is a 99.999995045% chance to not draw Y'Shaarj
Zillamon Animu At least learn some combinatorics before posting a comment about math. You computed the complement of not drawing to be drawing all Y’Ahaarj
I can't get enough of these clips.
Awesome Toast !
I WANT MOOOOOOOAAAARRR CLIPS.
Try boogiemonster deck.Think of one
Thing is boogiemonster is always worse than gruul... well except if you give him windfury but you still have to hit minions for him to grow so even then I'd say it is worse.
I got him from pack 3 times, one golden, i really NEED boogeymonster deck
If there is a boogiemonster deck, I bet you that it contains faceless manipulators...
Hmm I just thought of some funny combo in warrior:
Barnes into Boogiemonster into charge+commanding shout. It doesn't seem to have any real viable meaning, but it's sort of a funny way to start his ramping up.
Karsh
so like... 9 mana for a 3/1 boogiemonster? xD even if you count barnes stat it's like 9 mana 6/5... waow a 3 card combo that cost 1 mana more than boogiemonster and is worse than boogiemonster.... are you the guy that invented purify?
+Laezar he's theorizing and giving options.
While you are just placing walls between an idea and you.
I realized just now that you missed an interaction. if the bishop revives Medivh, he says "Games? I oh so love games!"
well, there is a 1 in 4 chance of getting a yshaarj in ur hand, but also 1 in 4 for barnes, after that 7 draw 2 or 3 more cards depending on your side, coin or no, which means you basically have a 30% chance of getting barnes and a 10% chance of getting ysharj... 30 - (10% of 30)= 27% ofc u dont have 30 cards anymore at that point so the chance of drawing them increases, but i dont want to do the math xD too much work. anyways, in the end you have a 26% to 29% chance of pulling it off on turn 3, after that u have a 50/50 chance of pulling it off, 50% of (100 - 27.5) = 36.25%
36.25 + 27.5% = 63.75%....
there is also a chance of your opponent having an answer soooo..... should be about 60% chance.... WAIT!?!? did you do the math already? your (what i assume is a guess) percentage is quite acurate... nice! sadly i need 600 dust more to get a yshaarj xD..... after unoacking 3 antonidas' cards in a row ffs!
You haven't included the chance of getting ysharj by turn 3 in your 36.25% calculation
+David Cox ik
+David Cox but thats one of the reasons i dropped tge 63 to 60
shiraishiii urararararararararaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
please switch body with me
2:22 are you feeling it now mr crabs 😂😂😂
100% Win Rate, 30% of the time. Seems legit.
I still rewatch the video in 2019 . Still gold comedy
But toast, it's Y'Shaarj, not Y'Sharaaj.
I wondered about the pronunciation too, but the WOW wiki says, and I quote, "Pronounced YAH-Sha-Raj"...even though it should clearly be said, "Yuh-Shaarj". :s
pretty sure its pronounced Why-Sh-Are-Jay
Okay 4chan overlord, calling people "newfags". Plus maybe I was referring to how he spelled it in the beginning? why don't you approach someone more carefully to prevent your own point from being wrong.
man this is by far the best video I've seen from you.
what I have a math degree
Dis guy is toast
dis guy like his own comment
lol
i actually made this exact (almost) deck the other day, i was in such a rush to just make it and play with it and was quite excited to have the PERFECT hand of (barnes, prep, gang up, coin and a few others i dont remember) by turn three in my FIRST game! i know right? problem was, i played coin barnes, and was freaking out that i only noticed once i ended my turn and nothing was pulled by yshaarj that, in the rush of making the deck, i quickly grabbed yogg instead of yshaarj. actually ended up playing for a while, enough to actually get a yogg, shadowstep into yogg the next turn. still lost though, but was a fun experince of my everlasting stupidity.
Where can I find a deck list?
.. and I'm also curious about the winrate.
www.hearthpwn.com/decks/634332-disguised-toasts-barnes-yshaarj-combo-100-win-rate
This is the story of a toast, slowly going insane as he just needs to not draw "Yah-Sharajjj"
Renounce Darkness-Barnes: www.twitch.tv/disguisedtoasths
willy
I prefer ragnoros plus shadowstep
"This game was won"
Disguised Toast
Do you ever play with normal decks?
Why would you do that, most normal decks are boring
we gonna make this combo happen again with the new rogue legendary and darkness bois
this guy sounds like amaz
John Doe fck the amaz hate that Guy sounds like Gay annoying af
You showed me this troll combo, just for this im subscribing to this channel
I love you
E-SHAARGE pliz
JASARAJJJJJ
us.battle.net/hearthstone/en/blog/20079873/whispers-of-the-old-gods-the-entourage-of-yshaarj-3-31-2016 yah-sha-raj
You are so into the Barnes theme
even Astral Druid seems more consistent than this.
How did he climb from rank 13 to rank 5 with this deck? O_O
thx topure skill :D
Im pretty sure he reversed the clips from when he dropped 8 ranks, not climbed.
it's not reverse look at the time in the left botom corner
The movie is Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy (2004)
I don't know if anyone noticed, but the guy in the video is in disguise, perhaps as a slice of epically mustached toast.
5:27 that ramped druid
1:17 when you finally get All A+ on your report card
I got both legendaries in golden from packs early on. I never realized they can be that fun. Thanks for sharing! I never used both for any deck seriously
I like your edits so much when you say something like "That would never happen". And guess what? It happens a second after you say it. Hahaha love u toast.
I love the Disguised Toast costume.
The anchorman ending was perfect
Holy shit Toast your comment about them being in reverse made me laugh so hard i started coughing.
Best Hearthstone video , enough said
Gratz !
You have just killed Hearthstone 😫
This is the most troll deck ive seen... FUCKING LOVE IT! And the toast mask
Blizzard: Hey, what if we make a card that can draw a high minion like this video but make it cost 6 mana to summon?
Birth of Madam Goya
The title is so perfect.
Toast has sum bagels under his sleeves
Toast, you are my favourite kind of bread
the anchor man clip at the end gave you the upvote. gg.
You forgot the "Hey, lights out" at the end ... again.
Hearthstone needs a brainstorm for these types of decks.
"Holy shit this tale is about to get more tragic"-disguised toast
And that's when HS begins to slowly turn into Magic the gathering
4:50 "I have a math degree" LMAO
Every time I play this deck, my opponent still has the answer by turn 4
This deck can still operate (mostly) as planned if you draw Y'Shaarj before you play Barnes. Just Y'Shaarj, Preparation, Gang Up. And pray that you can keep the board clean for the first 9 turns (or 8 if you have the coin).
I'm surprised how many people have not realized by now that draws in Hearthstone are not entirely random. There is an algorithm in place that almost always puts your highest mana costing card in the top half of your deck. I say almost because there is a very small chance that your highest mana card(s) will be on bottom half. The algorithm also uses card rarity ratio to determine draw chance, as in there is a very high chance of getting a legendary in your starting hand/top half of deck that is even higher the more mana it cost and depends on the number of legendaries in deck as well. Therefor, at the part where you said you had 1 out of 23 chances of getting Y'shaarj was actually closer to 1 out of 8. You can test this algorithm out yourself. The chance of the 10 mana cost legendary card being in top half of deck is higher the bigger the gap is between the 10 cost card and the next lowest man cost. Anyone that has played Hearthstone long enough should of noticed this pattern of almost always getting your highest cost minion in either starting hand or at least in first half of deck. You aren't imagining things. It's an intentional part of the design.
Blake Stanley
No, this was tested exstensively, which I was completely unaware of until one day I went searching, plus I noticed it in every Hearthstone streamer/UA-camr I've watched over the past couple years. And it's not rigged exactly because there is still a chance there. The algorithm is just conditional based on factors unseen by the player. I took this research farther and even talked to programmers that all say the same thing, that an algorithm cannot ever truly be random. It's impossible. Algorithms have to be carefully planned and setup based on certain criteria that depends on what the algorithm is for and what the programmer wants to do with it. All a programmer can do is try to give the illusion of randomness the best they can by setting these conditions/criteria that determine the behavior/output of the algorithm. They can create variables, but Hearthstone does not have that many variables to work with. Just card rarity, mana cost, card type, key words on the cards, and I think that's it. Computers cannot generate random numbers, but they can have so many variables that you can never tell it isn't random. Every function is based on an algorithm, and algorithms are never truly random. I've played TCGs/CCGs most of my life and I only noticed these patterns when I play an online TCG/CCG. I never notice them in physical TCG/CCG, which I now of course know why. Shuffling and drawing in a physical TCG/CCG is truly random.
There are a lot of misconceptions about how computer RNGs work in your explanation. First of all, a computer is not limited to the variables of the game to seed the RNG with. It can use the time. Furthermore, every hearthstone game is adjucated by a server. A server can actually produce truly random numbers if it has a built in hardware randomness source.
the anchor man at the end was tge best
This man/toast deserves a medal
if only i could like a video more than once
I just tried this deck recently.. I was able to pull off the mega 7 Y'Shaarj combo on my 5th try!! I'm so hype right now
Dat meme at the end got me so hard.... I ment laughing, not what she said.
6:34 lore accurate 🌚
The title is like some spinoff of Anchorman
don't think he can be like this without his toast alter ego.
That was a very nice meme deck.
YOU BROKE THE GAME