Biggest Royal Family Secrets Of All Time

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @judithryle2113
    @judithryle2113 4 роки тому +106

    That spencer tiara she wore on her wedding day is the prettiest tiara I have ever seen. It just sparkled

    • @eladiogarth1926
      @eladiogarth1926 3 роки тому +9

      Every time I see it I agree more, and more, and more.....simply spectacular indeed

  • @rebekkariblet4500
    @rebekkariblet4500 5 років тому +976

    Camilla never was out of Charles life and that was a shame Diana was a beautiful princess my heart broke when we lost her to an evil mess

    • @alexeiromanov2250
      @alexeiromanov2250 5 років тому +16

      Camilla is one of the better looking british royas. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😱😱😱😱😱😱😱🤢🤮

    • @amandalierly1291
      @amandalierly1291 5 років тому +50

      @@vivihutson5285 look back in history Diana was more Royal than Prince Charles. She comes from the Tudors line, so actually when Prince Charles married Diana he married up in royal. They needed that marriage to work.

    • @gordonsmith8899
      @gordonsmith8899 5 років тому +7

      Remekka riblet
      Yes she most certainly was = she only met Charles when her husband Andrew was playing in the same polo matches. There are dozens of photographs of Camilla and Diana in one another's company.
      About time you dragged yourself into the present day - Diana Spencer's medical history is being discussed.

    • @waioratewini3690
      @waioratewini3690 5 років тому +13

      He’s just like the majority of disgraceful men and shit on a beautiful woman.and look wat he claimed.hag

    • @gordonsmith8899
      @gordonsmith8899 5 років тому +10

      @@waioratewini3690
      Just like the majority of disgraceful women you take to sexist gossip - the man has always got to be to blame - and loads of spiteful crap about another woman.
      Law courts across the world are full of women like you, blaming men for all buggered up marriages.
      Diana was not an angel and Camilla has proved to be a good wife, friend and companion to an much maligned Prince of Wales.

  • @Nan-fi2he
    @Nan-fi2he 5 років тому +131

    You can't blame her for wanting someone to love her!!!! especially since her own husband didn't... I find it amazing that after all this time we are still talking about this.. and we are still so protected over this amazing woman !!

    • @cpcolgate6903
      @cpcolgate6903 5 років тому +11

      I agree. Stop trying to copy Diana, Megan...it is sickening!

    • @louisekirk5718
      @louisekirk5718 5 років тому +11

      i have no idea why people idolise diana so much. people cannot know much about her because she was just as bad as charles she admitted her affairs she also admitted to having an eating disorder and throw herself down the stairs when pregnant with William all for attention...i know as brits we tend to look at people who have died with rose coloured glasses but people go way way over thr top with diana lets nit forget she used her kids for media attention she openly wanted to br thr best and favourite parent again using the media for that....honestly people for some reason totally forget that, yes she did stuff for charities but so did fergie infact fergie did ALOT for charity she doesnt get praise for it like diana bloody ridiculous the unrequited love affair people have for diana

    • @charleswatson1093
      @charleswatson1093 5 років тому +4

      @@louisekirk5718 Very well said, Louise. It's time that the Diana myth was put to bed.
      I find it hard to forgive thr lies that she told about Prince Charles, and the Royal Family in general.

    • @lilalienangel
      @lilalienangel 5 років тому +12

      Louise Kirk
      Fergie also never tried to live a normal life. Did you know Diana was working as a nanny and the lady who hired her had no clue untill she engaged Charles!! In fact she kept working there for awhile afterwards too. In that she is superior and closer to the people than any other royal..

    • @justmyopinion7434
      @justmyopinion7434 4 роки тому +5

      @@lilalienangel actually she was working at a kindy when she got engaged.

  • @annieannie110
    @annieannie110 5 років тому +254

    I'm British, and I just have to say this isn't accurate at all. Prince Charles has not changed the line of succession. When Prince William, and later Prince Harry, were born they immediately became 2nd and 3rd in succession behind Charles. Prince Andrew and his siblings were automatcially pushed down the line.

    • @janismarierawlins8805
      @janismarierawlins8805 5 років тому +17

      @Michelle Ferguson One can only hope that you are correct, just the thought of Charles & CowMilla sitting on the throne is just plan sickening!

    • @torinjones3221
      @torinjones3221 5 років тому +13

      This is true. Though I've always been a supported of elective monarchies like the pre Norman invasion English monarchy was. The Princess Royal would make a far superior monarch than Charles.

    • @sulaimarnwisit1445
      @sulaimarnwisit1445 5 років тому +1

      White

    • @WickedFelina
      @WickedFelina 5 років тому +7

      @@torinjones3221 I have always thought the same thing

    • @valerieaue7961
      @valerieaue7961 5 років тому +5

      I'm not British but even I know how it works!

  • @r.c.miller6161
    @r.c.miller6161 2 роки тому +35

    Charles was obviously the one at fault. Camilla was always present. During the courtship, at the wedding, on the honeymoon, and for ever after.

    • @glendastouffer1470
      @glendastouffer1470 2 роки тому +6

      Charles and Camilla did this together. It takes two to tango. Camilla could have been a "LADY" and stepped out. A "LADY" says "NO".

    • @r.c.miller6161
      @r.c.miller6161 2 роки тому +3

      @@glendastouffer1470 Absolutely!

    • @debbiemccandless1973
      @debbiemccandless1973 2 роки тому

      $===

  • @gailhitson6722
    @gailhitson6722 3 роки тому +49

    I'm most shocked by the way Charles and Camilla drug the royal family through heck and back by carrying on their affair with zero sense of discretion, decency, and honor. An affair may be common among some circles, but being the heir to the throne and being married to a lovingly dutiful and beautiful young woman makes it hard to understand why he had to brutally go public. Why they did it and then relentlessly threw it in Diana's face and before the nation is incomprehensible to many.

    • @r.c.miller6161
      @r.c.miller6161 2 роки тому +4

      Amen. Charles was always at fault and became vicious when Diana called him out. He. certainly does not deserve to be King.And Cowmilla is a joke.

    • @blahblahblah6898
      @blahblahblah6898 2 роки тому +3

      In the specific topic charles is just as much of a victim as Diana is and they are both at fault for having several affairs… People really eat everything the media says and since Diana is portrayed as perfect her husband, at the time, is viewed as the villain or some shit. According to the facts and the stories we know of both are victims and both are to blame.

    • @davidarundel6187
      @davidarundel6187 2 роки тому +2

      @@r.c.miller6161 Mountbatten should have minded his own buisness , & Charley , should have married Camilla , before he went into the Navy .

    • @r.c.miller6161
      @r.c.miller6161 2 роки тому

      @@davidarundel6187 But he didn’t. C&c then carried on publically like dogs in heat. They are immoral and have no shame.

    • @janismarierawlins8805
      @janismarierawlins8805 2 роки тому +1

      CowMilla is Charles, The Man Childs Mum, Nanny, Adviser and Everything in between! CowMilla has been working that Fool from the day she met him, Charles couldn’t see it, CowMilla placed herself in his path and began to get in his head making sure she had him just where she wanted and didn’t give a care about anyone but herself, she saw Charles as a viable Paycheck!!!!

  • @MasterMind468
    @MasterMind468 5 років тому +474

    As soon as Prince William was born he became 2nd in line ahead of Prince Andrew.... this is always how it has worked. Prince Charles didn’t change any rules. If you’re going to talk about the line of Succession, at least try to know what you are talking about. If not, just stick to the celebrity gossip. There are about 6000 people who are in line to the throne. I can explain more if you want

    • @louisekirk5718
      @louisekirk5718 5 років тому +49

      you can tell they arent British they have no idea that what they are talking about is utter bollox, they have so much if it wrong if you are going to make videos on certain subjects at least make yhr information correct it is not exactly rocket science. as soon as Charles became a dad to William then Andrew was knocked from the throne as William automatically becomes kind after Charles, then it is William's children then harry then Harry's children etc etc unless all these people die or abdicate then Andrew will never be king

    • @jynxie17
      @jynxie17 5 років тому +39

      Lol. I'm not British and even I know that they talking crap with that!

    • @NickCC23
      @NickCC23 5 років тому +20

      6000 people in line for the throne and I'm not one of them.

    • @lindamaemullins3086
      @lindamaemullins3086 5 років тому +4

      Doesn't anyone remember 1814?

    • @MasterMind468
      @MasterMind468 5 років тому +3

      @@lindamaemullins3086 what do u mean

  • @richardhoff1626
    @richardhoff1626 3 роки тому +15

    Princess Beatrice's boyfriend Paolo was convicted in Worcester, MA. after a fellow college student came to the aid of a woman that Paolo was verbally abusing. Paolo pushed him down the stairs and he the other student died. When Paolo was caught in Switzerland with the Beatrice and Fergie, he was in violation of his parole. Not a guy you want hanging out with your daughter.

  • @missladymo
    @missladymo 4 роки тому +65

    This was like a 5th graders history project. None of the royals are descended from Richard III. Not only did his only son die years before, the crown was taken by Henry VII in the Battle of Bosworth Hill during which Richard was killed.
    A little bit of research would’ve made this more interesting and, well, factual.

    • @kwek2243
      @kwek2243 2 роки тому +5

      You needed to read the history because Richard IV's daughter, Princess Elizabeth married Henry TUDOR. SO ALTHOUGH THEY DID NOT DESCEND ON RICHARD III'S SONS, THEY DESCENDED TO HIM THROUGH HIS niece, Elizabeth of Yolk.

    • @r.c.miller6161
      @r.c.miller6161 2 роки тому

      Oh good grief. They are all imposters to the throne. Of German bloodline.

    • @kamiemarie4684
      @kamiemarie4684 2 роки тому +1

      I agrée big time i read this too👍🏾

  • @Sinuri07
    @Sinuri07 3 роки тому +66

    Well prince Charles distancing himself from prince Andrew is one of the best things he has done

    • @benfabian1740
      @benfabian1740 3 роки тому

      I guess im randomly asking but does anybody know of a trick to log back into an instagram account??
      I was stupid forgot the password. I appreciate any assistance you can offer me!

    • @johnnybowen7714
      @johnnybowen7714 3 роки тому

      @Ben Fabian Instablaster :)

    • @sistarkenyasue2078
      @sistarkenyasue2078 2 роки тому

      However good friends with Jimi Savile & Uncle Mountbattan !!!!

  • @aliciacapiral9598
    @aliciacapiral9598 3 роки тому +84

    Queen Elizabeth 👑 is a well known popular and successful wealthy queen world wide 🌎. May God continue to bless you always our Queen 👑🙏

    • @reubensantos4674
      @reubensantos4674 3 роки тому +3

      You're right Queen Elizabeth 👑 is wealthy and successful, and very popular wide world 🌎
      Queen Elizabeth is wealthy and successful because she's an investor

    • @carolynhough9231
      @carolynhough9231 3 роки тому +3

      Successful people don't become that way overnight, what most people see at a glance wealth a great career purpose is the result of hard working and patient.
      I pray that anyone who reads this will be Successful in life 🙏

    • @peterkingsley9746
      @peterkingsley9746 3 роки тому

      Success seems to be connected with action, Successful people keep moving they make mistakes but they don't quit

    • @beverlyjackson8944
      @beverlyjackson8944 3 роки тому

      Success come with plenty efforts nobody becomes a millionaire or billionaire by working for others and depending on them
      good investment brings millions of dollars and consistency brings billions dollars

    • @lorebohn1672
      @lorebohn1672 3 роки тому

      Speaking of success and investment
      my advise to everyone is start Investing into Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITS), Stocks market, Cryptocurrency/BTC and Gold.
      Start investing now to save yourself from stress and poverty in the future

  • @margaretdesaubin4456
    @margaretdesaubin4456 3 роки тому +58

    Margaret was in no position to judge anyone else she was far from perfect herself

    • @Loobylooto2
      @Loobylooto2 2 роки тому +6

      Totally true

    • @kathymaeve
      @kathymaeve Рік тому

      @@Loobylooto2 But, she had great fun being herself!

  • @renae9365
    @renae9365 5 років тому +151

    Margarite was a wild child that didn’t follow the rules either, she can’t throw stones at Diana

    • @sharongailwilliams7333
      @sharongailwilliams7333 5 років тому +33

      Margaret was spoiled and thought she was the beautiful princess. Diana's upstaged her and got all the attention. There is no one in the kingdom as beautiful as Diana

    • @cjosborne9430
      @cjosborne9430 5 років тому

      @@sharongailwilliams7333 She had a huge nose and sticks for legs and her bulimia made her breathe reek. Oh, and she was stupid; couldn't get into a single

    • @georgia8592
      @georgia8592 4 роки тому +11

      Probably the reason she hated her😂

    • @ΕιρήνηΚυριαζη
      @ΕιρήνηΚυριαζη 3 роки тому

      As far as i know Diana had bulimia too... Margaret was perhaps Diana's only supporter at the beginning , according to what Diana kept on saying... even after Charles and Diana divorced she told Charles that she was determined to have a good relationship with his ex-wife... Everything changed after the "Panorama interview"...
      By the way why was she stupid?

    • @Ellie-y2b
      @Ellie-y2b Рік тому

      She was jealous of Diana

  • @priteshkaria9878
    @priteshkaria9878 4 роки тому +60

    For the record Richard the 3rd wasn't found in London. He was found in my home town of Leicester. Love how anyone outside of the UK think London is the only city here 😂😂😂

    • @msdaniellanutella
      @msdaniellanutella 4 роки тому

      That's not true 😊😊. Us Aussies know better. We are obsessed with the UK.... but this fact I don't know nothing about. Now I have to do my research....😀😀

    • @priteshkaria43
      @priteshkaria43 4 роки тому +1

      @@msdaniellanutella I'm sorry but....you don't live here therefore you don't know the truth! Don't presume to say you know better. I live 10 minutes from the carpark where he was found!

    • @msdaniellanutella
      @msdaniellanutella 4 роки тому +8

      Well thanks for the attitude but you obviously didn't read what I wrote!!! Don't be rude and attack other people. I don't care where you live.

    • @perrymorgan4720
      @perrymorgan4720 3 роки тому

      @@msdaniellanutella how are you doing?

    • @GimmeLeCat
      @GimmeLeCat 3 роки тому

      Sir,do you really think everyone in the world is stupid to that extent that they think London is the only city in the uk. Seems like you have never travelled anywhere.

  • @dr.c.c.1671
    @dr.c.c.1671 5 років тому +108

    How does needing a hug equal having mental illness? This is trash reporting.

  • @bettynolo23
    @bettynolo23 5 років тому +134

    Harry speaking publicly about his mental health struggles was a huge step forward for the royal family. It shows how much they've moved with the times.

    • @torinjones3221
      @torinjones3221 5 років тому +8

      It's boring. They're supposed to be see inspiring and other worldly

    • @lucybraun2963
      @lucybraun2963 5 років тому +4

      Harry's recent decision making is a huge indicator that mental challenges persist.

    • @patfondren6013
      @patfondren6013 5 років тому +6

      @@lucybraun2963 It shows what a crank he is.

    • @jen137
      @jen137 5 років тому +9

      Torin Jones - I believe it is inspirational that he came forward publicly with his battles. Everyone is human and everyone has their own battles....him hiding his would be far worse than coming forward with it. It makes him human, open, honest and down to earth sharing his story. Viewing his public admission as anything negative or bashing him for it would be a mistake on the public’s part....every move they make is scrutinized already so if we jumped on the bandwagon to berate him for sharing his battles would make us petty and disrespectful.

    • @cjosborne9430
      @cjosborne9430 5 років тому +3

      No, it shows that Harry thinks he qualifies for a "victim" status. His PRIVILEGED BUTT has never held a job in 35 years. Never taken a single college course. Never learned a skill or a craft. Never had an interest other than drinking and drugging to excess. He doesn't even clean up his own puke. (He has "aides" who are instructed to keep his "DNA strewn" vomit hidden from the public.) His time in the military was a giant cover up. He did NOTHING but play video games and play cards with his body guards.
      Oh, yes, Harry is a REAL CREDIT to the BRF. In fact, he is a vile character; with zero redeeming features. Charles should have ignored his mother and put Harry in his place 35 years ago.

  • @maestroclassico5801
    @maestroclassico5801 5 років тому +443

    You said King and Queen......You should have said the Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh.

    • @truenews3763
      @truenews3763 5 років тому +21

      Yes, so true. He DEFINITELY ISNT A KING AND IS ELIZABETHS 1ST COUSIN, EEEEEWWWWWWWWW. I CANT IMAGINE, YUCK !

    • @MAA77723
      @MAA77723 5 років тому +21

      white conservative patriot. 3rd cousin.

    • @truenews3763
      @truenews3763 5 років тому +8

      @@MAA77723 , really? I have always heard 1st cousin's........

    • @maestroclassico5801
      @maestroclassico5801 5 років тому +8

      @@truenews3763 No but Queen Victoria and Prince Albert were 1st Cousins and Mary, Queen of Scots and her husband Lord Darnley were "half" 1st Cousins. And oops (late edit), William (III) and Mary (II) were 1st cousins...buuuuut had no kids.....couldve had one monarch over the UK AND Netherlands if they had.

    • @supaflysye
      @supaflysye 5 років тому +12

      white conservative patriot. There not 1st cousins his mother and her father are 3rd cousins they are both 2x great grandchildren of queen Victoria her great grandfather was king Edward the 7th son of queen Victoria and the duke of Edinburgh’s great grandmother was princess alice daughter of queen Victoria

  • @angiealexis3717
    @angiealexis3717 4 роки тому +33

    Prince Harry has the identical voice of his father Prince Charles. Stop the damned rumors already!

    • @waynepatrick17
      @waynepatrick17 4 роки тому +2

      Who di you think is his father considering rothchilds have breading rites to the royals ,,,leave yourr answer

    • @bwoww_163
      @bwoww_163 4 роки тому

      Idiot

  • @peepkagirl1
    @peepkagirl1 5 років тому +134

    If it hadn't been for Charles and Camilla, Diana would never looked at any other man. As for Harry, take a look at Prince Phillip at Harry's age. They look like identical twins!!! Considering all the playboys the late Princess Margaret had, it is almost comical that she held a grudge against Diana!!! I remember Margaret on a yacht, in a bikini, with a cigarette in one hand and a drink in the other with Roddy Lewellyn hanging all over her. How regal!!!

    • @sylviayarrell8421
      @sylviayarrell8421 5 років тому +1

      Wasn't that Sarah Ferguson on the yacht in a bikini when Prince Andrew was away in service? Just asking

    • @peepkagirl1
      @peepkagirl1 5 років тому +12

      @@sylviayarrell8421 Yes, you're right. Sarah Ferguson WAS, but Margaret was the original party girl 20 years before Sarah even came along. This was in the 1970's.

    • @roxannajoseph325
      @roxannajoseph325 5 років тому +1

      @@peepkagirl1 You're so right. My mom told be all about her partying days!!

    • @IntellectualCuriosity
      @IntellectualCuriosity 5 років тому +8

      Pcss Margaret’s hypocritical attitude towards Pcss Diana was ridiculous. Mags was trashy AF but since she’s got royal blood she could do what she wanted. Diana was just a commoner...how dare she bring negative press to the royals. Hypocrites!

    • @bun04y
      @bun04y 5 років тому +4

      I think that Margaret was more upset with Diana going to the press than her affair. They royals have always been "jumping ship," the press just kept it mum until Diana brought it out in the open.

  • @darladahmen5413
    @darladahmen5413 5 років тому +61

    Diana’s brother has red hair. Harry looks like his paternal grandfather.

    • @lizh1988
      @lizh1988 4 роки тому +6

      He also looks like his father, has the close together eyes. He looks a lot like his Spencer grandfather, and also his aunt Sarah Spencer.

    • @lorrainetavares1753
      @lorrainetavares1753 4 роки тому +2

      HE IS: check out Janine's revelation on how PH was conceived & WHO his REAL biological father is: very shocking!!!

    • @tsunamieyes
      @tsunamieyes 3 роки тому +1

      Also from the Queen

    • @Snap-Cap
      @Snap-Cap 3 роки тому

      cuz they all made from incest

    • @tsunamieyes
      @tsunamieyes 3 роки тому

      @@Snap-Cap I’ve read that also.

  • @tigibucaro1368
    @tigibucaro1368 4 роки тому +135

    where’s your favorite son now, elizabeth? lololol 😂

  • @TheTibmeister
    @TheTibmeister 5 років тому +30

    I hope the kids hang onto their hair longer than their father did. It’s ironic how much they all look like Diana

    • @SuperTweezy5
      @SuperTweezy5 5 років тому +3

      It's not irony; it's genetics. Seeing as Diana was their mother, it stands to reason that they might look like her.

    • @eladiogarth1926
      @eladiogarth1926 3 роки тому +1

      I think Harry is the spitting image of his grand father Prince Phillip

  • @shaantoor3329
    @shaantoor3329 4 роки тому +25

    Prince Charles has eliminated his siblings from being in line for the crown HOW? He has children, the same as just about every other royal in history, not a new thing I think!

    • @abc-wv4in
      @abc-wv4in 3 роки тому +7

      The line of succession is set by law. Charles is rightfully the next in line, and then William after him.

    • @The_Real_Mier
      @The_Real_Mier 3 роки тому +3

      Maybe he did so before he had kids? After all: history shows quite the vicious ‘elimination to get the throne’-incidents.. 🙄

    • @glen7318
      @glen7318 2 роки тому +2

      @@The_Real_Mier nonsense, Charles cannot alter the succession

  • @lizzief4461
    @lizzief4461 4 роки тому +24

    Umm the reason the royal family isn’t the same a Richard 3 was because he was killed at war when he lost the crown and it continued to change in the war of the roses

    • @jasonb3935
      @jasonb3935 3 роки тому +2

      And the royal family are from germany changed name to winnser

    • @rhubarb4898
      @rhubarb4898 3 роки тому +1

      Lol. Good point

    • @kirajessiemoynihan
      @kirajessiemoynihan 3 роки тому +1

      @@jasonb3935 You clearly cannot spell and it's Windsor

  • @anneshields2010
    @anneshields2010 4 роки тому +8

    Diana was way too good for the royal family if she hadn’t married into them she’d be still with us today Diana was pure of heart kind caring and gentle okay we may have not have William or Harry or the cute grandkids but we’d still have Diana she was a angel RIP Diana

    • @dotevans9702
      @dotevans9702 2 роки тому

      Lack of a seat belt that took her life

  • @yevettebamber4273
    @yevettebamber4273 3 роки тому +13

    Prince Andrew always knew his kids would never be in line for the Crown. He's also the 3rd or 4th child, so the older sibilings and their children will keep pushing you and your kids farther down.

    • @corneliawissing7950
      @corneliawissing7950 3 роки тому +2

      Wasn't Andrew the one who insisted that his children be called princesses? Princess Ann, it seems, wasn't interested in having her children being recognised as 'royal'

    • @glen7318
      @glen7318 2 роки тому +1

      @@corneliawissing7950 Nonsnese. Anne's children could never be princes or princesses. Andrews were entitled to have a royal rank

    • @corneliawissing7950
      @corneliawissing7950 2 роки тому +1

      @@glen7318 , Please explain? As far as I know, he's only second-or-third-in-line-of-succession (if not further away), so as I understand, his children are constitutionally irrelevant. Have I got that all wrong? I'm willing to be taught.

  • @wendywardashley
    @wendywardashley 5 років тому +76

    Richard the thirds body was found under a car park.
    In Leicester not London .

    • @muffy491
      @muffy491 5 років тому +6

      I was just about to type this x quite a big difference between Leicester and London x

    • @torinjones3221
      @torinjones3221 5 років тому +5

      She's American. They think London is England and Scottish aren't British.

    • @FozzQuaker
      @FozzQuaker 5 років тому +2

      @@muffy491 Yeah, around 100 miles

    • @krisc7135
      @krisc7135 5 років тому +5

      @@torinjones3221 Please do not generalize. I realize that London and Leicester are miles apart, there are various towns and cities in the country....Middlesex, Gloucester, Brighton, Berwick-upon-Tweed, Reading, Manchester (from where many of my ancestors hailed), York, etc.and I am American. I also happen to realize that Scotland is a part of the UK, meaning that Scots are British (EDIT: as in part of Great Britain - not meaning to offend any Scots). Scotland became a part of England (not the UK at that time) at the beginning of James I and VI reign, Northern and Southern Ireland are divided on England, Wales is a separate country (EDIT: separate country from England, in case that wasn't clear) and more.... Not all Americans are so isolationist that we are unaware of basic history and geography. Some of us are very much Anglophiles because we realize that all of British History, before and after unification, is also our country's early history.
      EDIT: Also, not that it matters much...but.....I'm a Ricardian, so, i'm as pained by the glaring error as any in England and the rest of the United Kingdom.
      A lot of editing? Yes. I was an English major at University and can't help myself...

    • @Mel-zv1gf
      @Mel-zv1gf 5 років тому +4

      K C haha thanks for defending us! But the commenter isn’t really wrong. Most Americans don’t care enough to learn the differences. I only know a lot about the UK because I think their history is fascinating & I love the royal family.

  • @kymrawlins8099
    @kymrawlins8099 3 роки тому +15

    What new rules? It's a standard practise when an heir to the throne starts having their on children, those children will AUTOMATICALLY will move the heirs brothers and sisters further down the rankings.
    You really should start researching more before you post of how it work, and who is who.
    Currently doesnt have a King so its IMPOSSIBLE for the King to be the closest to Princess Anne.

  • @MsJinkerson
    @MsJinkerson 4 роки тому +47

    with that kind of money, they could feed the poor but they don't

  • @sandrastevens4418
    @sandrastevens4418 3 роки тому +7

    Richard the III was a plantegenet, then came the Tudors, the Stuarts, then the blood line goes German, during the regency, and then Queen Victoria Von Saxen Gotha. They changed their name to windsor before WWI.
    The DNA used to identity Richard was mitochondrial DNA given by Michael Ibsen and Wendy Duldig, the two living relatives, and Richard III all inherited their mitochondrial DNA type from Cecily Neville, Richard’s mother.
    Also in the DNA they found Richard to have blond hair and blue eyes.
    Richard III was found in a carpark in Leicester quite a ways from London.

  • @tmcrae2187
    @tmcrae2187 5 років тому +121

    Spencer’s have RED HAIR 😒

    • @mkuti-childress3625
      @mkuti-childress3625 5 років тому +5

      Tamara McRae But my understanding is that Diana has no Spencer blood. She was the product of an affair, so it all depends on her mother’s side of the family and whomever the father is.
      I could be wrong, but I read it somewhere... Which means don’t trust it!

    • @richiebcarric31
      @richiebcarric31 5 років тому +1

      So do the Hewitts

    • @elenikominos7404
      @elenikominos7404 5 років тому +2

      @@mkuti-childress3625 Your understanding is completely WRONG.

    • @elenikominos7404
      @elenikominos7404 5 років тому +6

      @@richiebcarric31 The notion that Captain James Hewitt is Prince Harrrys Father has been dispelled decades ago🙄

    • @cjosborne9430
      @cjosborne9430 5 років тому +2

      @@elenikominos7404 No, it was confirmed 35 years ago. It is now coming up again because crazy MM is trying to prove that Harry is WORTHY of the Throne and should replace William. So, you are on MM's side against the family.

  • @drpencil8321
    @drpencil8321 5 років тому +63

    Peter Townsend was not divorced when he was messing with the Princess. He was married with sons.

    • @gordonsmith8899
      @gordonsmith8899 5 років тому +1

      Dr Pencil
      Townsend was divorced you ugly liar.

    • @lovejoy7065
      @lovejoy7065 5 років тому +3

      @@gordonsmith8899
      He startf the affair before divorce.

    • @gordonsmith8899
      @gordonsmith8899 4 роки тому

      @Janette Webster
      I've done as you suggested and you are correct.

    • @sophiee.h
      @sophiee.h 3 роки тому

      @Dr Pencil! Do u watch the Crown, do u search stuff up?? I know that at the beginning he was married but when they started to think seriously about their relationship he was divorced

    • @drpencil8321
      @drpencil8321 3 роки тому +4

      @@sophiee.h "After the war, Margaret fell in love with Group Captain Peter Townsend. In 1952, her father died, her sister became queen, and Townsend divorced his wife, Rosemary. He proposed to Margaret early the following year. Many in the government believed that he would be an unsuitable husband for the Queen's 22-year-old sister, and the Church of England refused to countenance marriage to a divorced man. Margaret eventually abandoned her plans with Townsend and married photographer Antony Armstrong-Jones in 1960; the Queen made him Earl of Snowdon. The couple had a son, David, and a daughter, Sarah, before divorcing in 1978" It's sad that you think that the Crown is some sort of academic source for historic information. It's not even a documentary..

  • @worldonfire1539
    @worldonfire1539 5 років тому +218

    I have always thought that Prince Harry strongly resembles his grandfather, Prince Phillip. As far as I can see the only resemblance he has to James Hewitt is the color of his hair. If more people could see past that detail, they might agree.

    • @thebovineavenger
      @thebovineavenger 5 років тому +9

      @Gillian Walton I was just going to correct them and say the same thing. He looks like his Uncle. But you were on top of it.

    • @SHillFowler
      @SHillFowler 5 років тому +13

      The Prince is a ginger Spencer. He has a strong resemblance to his uncle. He also has a ginger maternal aunt.

    • @peepkagirl1
      @peepkagirl1 5 років тому +10

      You're absolutely right!!! A LOT of people just look at hair color and never think about facial features, bone structure, etc.

    • @katel7309
      @katel7309 5 років тому +9

      I saw a picture of a young Prince Philip somewhere and you could see Harry in him.

    • @IntellectualCuriosity
      @IntellectualCuriosity 5 років тому +11

      Agreed. He is the spitting image of a young Philip Mountbatten.
      Too many people refuse to open their eyes and really notice the similarities.

  • @robertabarboza6688
    @robertabarboza6688 4 роки тому +10

    Richard III and the Windsors are not from the same Royal House. Everyone knows that.

  • @leannerollingalong6342
    @leannerollingalong6342 3 роки тому +6

    The reason why King Richard III's body was found in a parking lot is because he was buried in side of a church which was common back then to bury people of high Royal blood in various parts of a church and since then the church was not down so anybody that was buried within that church would have remained on the grounds and then it became a parking lot so that's why he was found under a parking lot

  • @melvawages7143
    @melvawages7143 5 років тому +9

    King Richard died in the late 1400's. If you know anything about genealogy you would know- you inherit an random 50% from each parent which means it is not an even 25% from each grandparent. For example by my DNA I show I share more centigrams with my 2 cousins on my paternal grandfather's family than I do my paternal grandmother so I inherited more of his DNA from my father. It is the reverse for my eldest sister. By the time you get to 4th great grandparents, (5 generations from you,) there are some 4th great grandparents you share no DNA.. Plus Richard was NOT a direct ancestor. His niece marred Henry VII. and what was that 16-17 generations before Prince William? So it is not surprising Richard shares no DNA with today's Royal family.

  • @garrisonmallett1502
    @garrisonmallett1502 5 років тому +8

    I find the background music starting at the 16:55 mark thru the 20:10 mark very interesting and very royal but with an upbeat twist. I'm wondering if anyone would know what this music could be...

  • @matthew.wildsmith
    @matthew.wildsmith 5 років тому +12

    What respect does MM think she "deserves"??????..............exactly why she commands low public opinion

  • @patfondren6013
    @patfondren6013 5 років тому +23

    Of course, we don't mention that Meghan's maternity wardrobe cost more than 2 castles.

    • @vivianefay7410
      @vivianefay7410 5 років тому +5

      Pat Fondren for a pregnancy that did not exist

    • @robingoffinet3251
      @robingoffinet3251 5 років тому

      Pat Fondren She put that in her bank account. That way when meg leaves Harry she will be set.

    • @vivianefay7410
      @vivianefay7410 5 років тому +1

      Pat Fondren and if she is supposedly Expecting again we are going fork out all that again.....100 years ago she would have been thrown in the dungeon . Shame On her .

    • @MsAggie5
      @MsAggie5 5 років тому

      Pat Fondren let her spend more, royal family stole a lot from her gland,gland parents during slave trade.

    • @MsAggie5
      @MsAggie5 5 років тому

      I meant grand and grand parents we all know her mother is the grand daughter of slave ......spell mistake 👆👆👆👆

  • @amazonprime234
    @amazonprime234 5 років тому +18

    *If Prince Charles's half of the family keeps having children, well the monarchy will never get to princess Ann or prince Andrew...*

    • @poppeyp1083
      @poppeyp1083 5 років тому +3

      That's how it works, it's just down to pure luck when and where each of us are born with in the pecking order.

    • @cjosborne9430
      @cjosborne9430 5 років тому

      It's not SUPPOSED to get to "Princess ANNE" (spell her name correctly please); she is AFTER Andrew and Edward. And, it is supposed to GO THROUGH WILLIAM ALONE! The other children are to continue the line IF William could not have children, or if they died. If there were NO other children and William died without issue, the line would divert to the dukes (Kent or Gloucester) but are still WINDSORS.
      The monarchy is not a "round robin." Your sense of "everyone gets a turn" is pathetic public school nonsense. Think, please!

    • @lovejoy7065
      @lovejoy7065 5 років тому +1

      @@cjosborne9430
      Afteŕ William, isnt it to Harry and issues?

  • @mistyblue296
    @mistyblue296 5 років тому +35

    Harry takes after the Spencer side. Harry looks like his uncle.

  • @lucyosborne9239
    @lucyosborne9239 5 років тому +15

    You're right, most of this is speculation undeserving of the time it takes to watch the video. As for Prince Andrew, that's worth our time. The man just doesn't know right from wrong.

    • @virginiawallace87
      @virginiawallace87 5 років тому +2

      I agree. It is not worth discussing. The Andrew thing is something that’s hard to deal with for the family. I have to feel a little sorry for the girls. I think Fergie can weather the storm.

  • @CharlotteGothique
    @CharlotteGothique 5 років тому +13

    I'd love to see all the sources you got the information from :) Rumors are not fact

  • @t.raffel1199
    @t.raffel1199 3 роки тому +3

    Her: "People have had a particular obsession with the royal family"
    Me: Aren't you obsessed with the royal family?

  • @Katt_Geo
    @Katt_Geo 5 років тому +7

    Look at how Williiam is looking at Meghan @ 9:30 .. The word that comes to mind when I see that is "disapproval!!"

    • @lindawilliams578
      @lindawilliams578 5 років тому +2

      Kate should be concerned about how ole Willy boy looks at HER!!

  • @dennischallinor8497
    @dennischallinor8497 4 роки тому +14

    When I saw Charles standing vigil over his grandmother Queen Elizabeth you could see the utter devastation in his face. Queen Elizabeth raised Charles mostly because his parents were so busy with affairs of state, certainly no negligence on their part. I am one year older than Charles and if I were married to the person he is married to and at this age, I think I would abdicate in favour of William. It will be like Queen Victoria and Edward, he came to the throne at such an age his reign was short and not particularly distinguished. It's the way the Royal cookie crumbles!!!

    • @justmyopinion7434
      @justmyopinion7434 2 роки тому +2

      He will be a transitional king, which will help smooth the way when William becomes King. PC has waited a long time & trained to be king, but his reign will be short.

    • @dennischallinor8497
      @dennischallinor8497 2 роки тому +1

      @@justmyopinion7434 Like Edward VII - Mommie lasted too long! 😂

    • @justmyopinion7434
      @justmyopinion7434 2 роки тому +1

      @@dennischallinor8497 😄😄

  • @llsmcslllsmcsl4427
    @llsmcslllsmcsl4427 2 роки тому +5

    Margaret had NO right to put anyone else down. She nothing short of a wild woman. Has no one noticed that Harry looks a lot like Diana's brother and the rest of her family?

  • @marionwilson2521
    @marionwilson2521 3 роки тому +3

    We have always kept those poor children in prayers. I pray, they learn. I also pray they are family. Pray they can get past all of the petty things and be family. It is a shame all those children have been put through. If we have been through alot our hearts consider what those children have been through alot of pettiness.

  • @jikooklovechildxx2761
    @jikooklovechildxx2761 4 роки тому +9

    King Richards body wasn’t found in London, it was found in Leicester

  • @18gonma
    @18gonma 5 років тому +36

    I think Prince Henry looks like his paternal grandfather.

    • @missladymo
      @missladymo 4 роки тому +2

      Totally!!!!! The current Earl Spencer, Diana’s brother, even has red hair.

    • @trudydavis6168
      @trudydavis6168 3 роки тому +1

      Did you mean like his maternal grandfather, the Earl of Spencer?

    • @amandabrand4065
      @amandabrand4065 3 роки тому

      I'm pretty sure that you mean maternal grandfather.

  • @viviyohanan5528
    @viviyohanan5528 5 років тому +9

    Real Princess Diana!!♥️💚💛👑🌹

  • @chloeking9505
    @chloeking9505 4 роки тому +3

    "Spiritually, no person has dominion over any other person. God never gave one person power over another, even for good. Dominion is over your concept of another" (Joel S Goldsmith) The whole thing is a charade and the sooner we all wake up to it, the better for mankind and the planet.

  • @bres5010
    @bres5010 5 років тому +19

    I find it EXTREMELY curiousthat there is NO mention of Prince Edward save for in the begining when Prince Charles' shyness was mentioned! In fact so far ive yet to be able to find very much on him at all!

  • @KateBates22zabu
    @KateBates22zabu 5 років тому +8

    What happened with the arrest warrant for QE2 regarding disappearance of 10 Canadian children in October 1964.

    • @cjosborne9430
      @cjosborne9430 5 років тому

      That was a complete HOAX. Can you define HOAX? If you did the LEAST amount of actual research (you know, like we were taught in college so we would know how to (definitively) tell fact from fiction) you would KNOW that was the work of a SINGLE CRAZED INDIVIDUAL WHO HATES THE QUEEN AND PRINCE PHILIP!!!! There is NO SUCH GROUP. There is NO SUCH COURT. That was 100% LIES! Fantasy! Hatred! And a great way to show how GULLIBLE some people are; if you say something happened at the "7th Superior Court of Western Montana" some FOOL will repeat it as if it is real. Good grief, you really believe the earth is flat, don't you? Or that the sky is falling? READ and THINK for a change! And stop HATING THE QUEEN SO MUCH! You look like a fool!

  • @justanobodyonyoutube3580
    @justanobodyonyoutube3580 4 роки тому +8

    The British Royal family should have a reality show

  • @ryancreed2385
    @ryancreed2385 5 років тому +25

    If the recordings or public, why not play them in this video

    • @F-J.
      @F-J. 5 років тому

      We already heard them.

  • @KandeShack
    @KandeShack 3 роки тому +7

    One of the most well known families in the world and also the cattiest! All the made up rumors and the reporting of gossip is so detrimental!

  • @croctologist
    @croctologist 5 років тому +18

    The Royals themselves may not have ever been very fond of Diana, and they are obviously not a major fan of Meghan, but they are both loved by the public. They are more authentic and genuine than the rest of the lot.

    • @TheLordOfNothing
      @TheLordOfNothing 4 роки тому

      They think she needs to be prim and posh and so proper, yet people can make their own decisions, not the public.

    • @janetbenning2645
      @janetbenning2645 4 роки тому +2

      I don't think Meghan is loved by the public.

  • @eladiogarth1926
    @eladiogarth1926 3 роки тому +5

    Most of these rumours I already knew, but I found it interesting as they were brought back to memory.

  • @leifhorse8398
    @leifhorse8398 5 років тому +33

    I laugh at this video, because it ain't nothing compared to what's really going on...

    • @lilalienangel
      @lilalienangel 5 років тому +3

      Leif Horse
      Right!!

    • @priscillacoral2559
      @priscillacoral2559 4 роки тому +4

      I’m trying to find some videos with the real TRUTH and can’t find anything.

    • @tatjanajankovic9020
      @tatjanajankovic9020 4 роки тому +1

      @Leif Horse, Exactly!!

    • @tatjanajankovic9020
      @tatjanajankovic9020 4 роки тому +2

      @@priscillacoral2559 in case you are still looking for videos with real truth, you should really see this documentary (here on youtube): "The truth behind the British Royal House of Windsor". 👍🏻

    • @eladiogarth1926
      @eladiogarth1926 3 роки тому +1

      Spill the tea nuh man? I'm from Jamaica. Very curious

  • @WhatTheHellRachelle
    @WhatTheHellRachelle 5 років тому +9

    If there’s a castle fit for habitation for $200K, I’m in!

  • @Uplifting_sfbay
    @Uplifting_sfbay 5 років тому +8

    Baby No. 4? Ok Prince William, I really think it's time to invest in a television now for the bedroom lol.

    • @bdavis4075
      @bdavis4075 5 років тому +2

      😬😈😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂IKR...

    • @ladyshasha4117
      @ladyshasha4117 5 років тому +1

      Kate is preggo again?

  • @umabakshi5592
    @umabakshi5592 5 років тому +18

    what the hell. Richard III was distantly related to Henry VII, his successor. Obviously the Windsors won't be related to him! They're directly descended from Henry VII, NOT Richard III.

    • @YourGraceMyLady
      @YourGraceMyLady 5 років тому +2

      Uma Bakshi Richard the 3rd was Elizabeth of York’s uncle. A lot of ppl say that her father was illegitimate tho, that may be where the discrepancy is and the “royal” bloodline was lost.

    • @WickedFelina
      @WickedFelina 5 років тому +3

      @@YourGraceMyLady Did you see the video hosted by Tony Robinson called "Britain's Real Monarch?" They follow the true Royal line of succession till they come to the person who should be King right now.

  • @KerrBearrxo
    @KerrBearrxo 5 років тому +2

    "in the shadow of his brother" lol what a load of shit, no one wants to be king its a ballache they'd rather stay as princes, more freedom, something they've both admitted.

  • @superlemmybros2824
    @superlemmybros2824 4 роки тому +3

    Princess Diane's brother has red hair, Harry has red hair. Ding Ding, oh and there are some younger pictures of Prince Charles, him and Harry look like twins.

  • @darwinang3399
    @darwinang3399 5 років тому +19

    correct me if i am mistaken, this comment is lifted from the 2001 movie a knitght's tale by the late heath ledger, something about the royal being stolen or taken at the tip of a sword or knife

  • @avalavendar3497
    @avalavendar3497 5 років тому +10

    They may fly "commercial" but they don't fly economy!

  • @mkuti-childress3625
    @mkuti-childress3625 5 років тому +5

    Actually, King Richard III has a gene that causes blondness in childhood, but not necessarily in adulthood. People with that gene often go darker as adults, which is what I suspect happened here.

  • @funnygirl8210
    @funnygirl8210 4 роки тому +4

    To anyone who reads this good morning/night and remember to smile 😃 todayxx also a little education the most likely reason they do not have the same DNA as Richard the third is due to the fact that the monachy moved on to Henry 7th after the war of the roses (which Richard the third lost btw) and who is not a relative to Richard the third but there many other incidents as this one this is just an example since there have been so many royals since 1066 ever since William the conqueror who was not even english so there are many twists and turns in the history of our royal family just mentioned if anyone was interested xx have a good time everyone 😊 x

  • @pamdoyle4355
    @pamdoyle4355 4 роки тому +7

    What about the wedding gift Diana opened from Charles that was for camila. Why she went thru with the wedding, I’ll never know.

  • @Ambarthetravellingchef
    @Ambarthetravellingchef 5 років тому +141

    Harry looks like his grandfather

    • @StormyDay
      @StormyDay 5 років тому +6

      Yes, his maternal grandfather.

    • @mirandacarpenter2117
      @mirandacarpenter2117 5 років тому +1

      No he doesnt!

    • @StormyDay
      @StormyDay 5 років тому

      Miranda Carpenter 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @cjosborne9430
      @cjosborne9430 5 років тому +2

      @@StormyDay No, he does not! William looks MUCH MORE like Diana's bio-father, and NOTHING like the silly Johnny Spencer (who HATED Diana) and nothing like Charles the 9th Earl Spencer who ALSO despised Diana. (He refused to give her a room (when Althorp has MORE THAN 50 bedrooms and 25 cottages.) It is LARGER than Highclere Castle (Downton Abbey), but Charles refused to give her a square inch.

    • @caroloneile2780
      @caroloneile2780 5 років тому +2

      Poor harry

  • @lizh1988
    @lizh1988 4 роки тому +3

    Harry has his father's eyes and some other features, looks like his Spencer grandfather and also resembles his aunt Sarah Spencer. Look at his childhood pics and his aunt Sarah. I am not saying they are any closer related than aunt and nephew, he just looks like a Spencer. He also looked like the Duke of Windsor as a child.

  • @ohfourbaby
    @ohfourbaby 3 роки тому +7

    YESSS thank you for making this video even thought I’m a couple years late😂 I hate that people glorify these people🚶🏽

  • @cherylcallahan5402
    @cherylcallahan5402 3 роки тому

    The Things Celebrity appreciate your videos Listening from Mass USA TYVM ♥️ Kamila Gate

  • @abc-wv4in
    @abc-wv4in 4 роки тому +15

    I'd say Charles does well by distancing himself from Andrew.
    The order of succession was changed so that females are now in line just like males. Charles didn't take his brothers and sister out of the line. Charles' children would have always been next. Where did you get that it was any different? When #1 in line has children, they always become next ahead of their uncles.

    • @canterburytail2294
      @canterburytail2294 4 роки тому +2

      +1 It's a very simple equation and it's odd so many don't know how it works.

    • @abc-wv4in
      @abc-wv4in 4 роки тому

      @@canterburytail2294 Yes, and if one is unsure, it's very simple to google and find out.

    • @sistarkenyasue2078
      @sistarkenyasue2078 2 роки тому

      Good friends with Jimi Saville

  • @laurenreed7263
    @laurenreed7263 4 роки тому +6

    Kate Middleton is my favorite!

  • @kaiserwilhelmii671
    @kaiserwilhelmii671 5 років тому +50

    Kate: *breathes*
    Everybody: SHE IS PREGNANT GUYS

    • @WickedFelina
      @WickedFelina 5 років тому

      Is it an old photograph? I have seen more recent photos, she definitely is not pregnant.

    • @kaiserwilhelmii671
      @kaiserwilhelmii671 5 років тому

      @@WickedFelina
      Exactly, out of a sudden everyone keeps saying "oh she's pregnant".

    • @kaiserwilhelmii671
      @kaiserwilhelmii671 5 років тому

      @@cathy3613
      I understand. I ment to make fun of the people who keep saying she is pregnant.

    • @kaiserwilhelmii671
      @kaiserwilhelmii671 5 років тому

      @@cathy3613
      Ah, ok, my bad.

    • @cjosborne9430
      @cjosborne9430 5 років тому +2

      @@kaiserwilhelmii671 Leave humor to the comedians. When you don't know how to do it, you sound stupid.

  • @dlesher3101
    @dlesher3101 5 років тому +11

    Look at pics of Charles when he was about 3 or 4 years of age, from the side view. Harry is the spitting image of his father. Nasty rumors.

    • @peepkagirl1
      @peepkagirl1 5 років тому +2

      You're right! I've seen it too. Trouble is, most people just look at hair color and jump to conclusions instead of looking at other things like individual facial features and bone structure.

    • @peepkagirl1
      @peepkagirl1 5 років тому +1

      Harry also looks EXACTLY like Prince Phillip did when he was in his thirties. Same facial features, same bone structure, same eyes. EVERYTHING except for the red hair which comes from his mother's genes! Trouble is, people see the red hair and that's it! Other than the red hair, there is not one single feature Harry shares with James Hewitt. NOTHING. As you said, nasty rumors.

  • @mikelm222
    @mikelm222 5 років тому +9

    King Richard III remains were found in a car park in Leicester - Not London

    • @richiebcarric31
      @richiebcarric31 5 років тому +1

      Henry VII right of succession after the death of R3 at Bosworth in 1485,does not bear close scrutiny....

  • @poodee9395
    @poodee9395 3 роки тому

    Thanks for the upload. I love other people gossip.

  • @kameelaally5045
    @kameelaally5045 5 років тому +11

    DONT THROW STONES WHEN YOU HAVE GLASS WINDOWS

  • @Gloria-ro4vn
    @Gloria-ro4vn 5 років тому +7

    Didn't England import a German to be King when there were no heirs. Elizabeth the I didn't have any children either.

  • @phototristan
    @phototristan 5 років тому +9

    Why didn’t Prince Charles marry Camila in the very beginning instead of Diana?

    • @barbarabarbre969
      @barbarabarbre969 5 років тому +1

      prince Charles married Diana rather than Camilla as Prince Charles needed heirs and Camilla was too old for childbearing.

    • @phototristan
      @phototristan 5 років тому +1

      @@barbarabarbre969 Huh? She's younger than him by 6 years...

    • @randerson2525
      @randerson2525 5 років тому

      @@phototristan Camilla is actually OLDER than Charles...by one year.

    • @midwestslotgeeks1081
      @midwestslotgeeks1081 5 років тому

      Barbara Barbre wrong wasn’t Camilla Married before

    • @patriciashannon6631
      @patriciashannon6631 5 років тому

      She was not deemed suitable by RF

  • @jocelynpoesnecker5526
    @jocelynpoesnecker5526 5 років тому +10

    People need to love God together.

  • @ty7778
    @ty7778 3 роки тому +4

    Oh my gosh so many inaccuracies, this came up on my feed and I couldn’t even finish it because it “reads” like a cheap supermarket tabloid. No substance. Just wow.

  • @annchurchill2638
    @annchurchill2638 5 років тому +8

    I wish Willaim could become King next. But Kate might not like royal duties.

    • @sarahmackeprangesquell6660
      @sarahmackeprangesquell6660 5 років тому +1

      I agree with you, she might not like it but I think she'll be the perfect fit as William's Queen Consort.

    • @jeanclancy2279
      @jeanclancy2279 5 років тому

      No she would not but she loves the thought of be coming queen

  • @erinrd
    @erinrd 5 років тому +26

    Offeence taken we are not ‘COMMONERS’ we are just as important as royals

    • @overdozze1226
      @overdozze1226 5 років тому

      Are you a royal?

    • @erinrd
      @erinrd 5 років тому +1

      Lookfinder Gamelol that’s not funny

  • @cobyjames3606
    @cobyjames3606 4 роки тому +12

    Princess margaret was one of my favorite royals

  • @KC-qi7gn
    @KC-qi7gn 2 роки тому

    Is any of this in the Opera Winfrey (OWN) Documentary? Just curious I'm from USA 🇺🇸 😉 😀 but I never saw the documentary

  • @leswehman11
    @leswehman11 5 років тому

    Thank you for the video. ! 😘

    • @queenelizabeth7906
      @queenelizabeth7906 4 роки тому

      I'm always amazed when I hear an incredibly impactful message delivered in just a few words, I love these kinds,
      I'm very friendly and I love meeting new friends to learn and know more that was why I requested for your friendship. Hope we can be a good friends ?.

  • @__Jada__
    @__Jada__ 5 років тому +4

    could you do a video that focuses only on the entire family tree of the royal family?

    • @festivelady826
      @festivelady826 5 років тому +2

      Jada Coe - It would be very small - the tree has very few branches.

    • @__Jada__
      @__Jada__ 5 років тому +1

      @@festivelady826 its weird how they just always jump around tho
      or at least a video on the evolution of princess diana

    • @festivelady826
      @festivelady826 5 років тому +2

      @@__Jada__ - Yes, they do. I've been around since the days of the scandals of Princess Margaret, so I have lived through a lot of changes and have seen many marriages, divorces and deaths in the RF.

  • @sarahsinden6597
    @sarahsinden6597 4 роки тому +5

    Was really enjoying this until Hewitt was brought into it as “maybe Harry’s father”...god lord how stupid are some people!!! Try putting a photo of earl spencer next to harry,Diana’s brother...then it will be very clear...shit throwing is ridiculous to the extreme ...

  • @bridgetsaenz2774
    @bridgetsaenz2774 5 років тому +8

    Oh God leave her rest in peace

  • @dawnemyers8873
    @dawnemyers8873 3 роки тому +2

    From what I have read about Price Charles and Princess Diana , I think he was spoiled and was loved Camilla because she mothered him. He needed a lot of attention and couldn't stand the fact how the people loved Princess Diana. He was so insecure about it that he was cruel to his wife and pushed her toward suicide! I dont like Charles or Margret. Princess Diana was a wonderful person with a baby husband. Shame on both Charles and Camilla!

  • @kfmlee
    @kfmlee 2 роки тому +1

    Princess Catherine doesn’t have to steal the scene from anyone, she has the scene anytime she presents.

  • @narcisse999
    @narcisse999 5 років тому +5

    There was never a Princess Diana, she was called Princes of Wales or Lady Diana but never Princess Diana, I cant figure out why so many people call her wrongly Princess Diana, strangely if you want to call her by a name and not Princess of Wales, she should be called Princess Charles, strange but true.

    • @yevettebamber4273
      @yevettebamber4273 2 роки тому

      She was "Never" called Princess Diana? That is the name we used here in the "States", so you are wrong. Regardless of right or wrong that's what we called her (:.

  • @WeneedpeaceNlovefromJC777
    @WeneedpeaceNlovefromJC777 5 років тому +4

    Lady D has similar life story with queen Sisi of austria, both of their husbands has dated with their sisters and both of them died tragedly

  • @myopinion6092
    @myopinion6092 3 роки тому +4

    Always thought that Diana was too good and beautiful for such a dishonest family.

  • @iminichireneminich4740
    @iminichireneminich4740 5 років тому +1

    Harry and Meghan, it's not what label the royals put on your children, It's your love and caring that matters than titles. Its the title you yourself put on your children',"" my precious children"" would be the top of the list. Make them feel loved and you won't notice that the royals are trying to bring them down. As i said, "they don't deserve the title of royals"if they are going to treat their family as they are doing. If they want to put you out of their minds and lives, remember the door swings both ways.

  • @glenroberts9644
    @glenroberts9644 5 років тому +1

    I am a BRON Caribbean WOMAN and MY Father is a BORN ENGLISHMAN who is in LOVE with the Caribbean.He`s father is a French Military officer in the WAR in the 18 centry, He`s Mother is a born English woman.