My mother visited Paris and the museum in the 60s. She said that the painting that is viewed to the public and what's in the museum is different she said that there is no photos of Moma Lisa . It's not allowed because fear of the photo flash would damage the painting. The original painting is not displayed in the museum to the public that it is in a volt. She also s tated that the MONA LISA SHE VIEWED There WAS NO BACKGROUND OF MOUNTAINS AND VALLEYS IN THE BACKGROUND.
3:30 I don't know if it's just me but the monalisa to the left was wearing a veil while the other isn't really wearing one just merely highlights it just to match the pic to the left
The character we see in the famous portrait at the Louvre is not that of Lisa del Giocondo or Mona Lisa, but that of Isabella of Aragon and Sforza, the daughter of the King of Naples Alfonso II of Aragon. Isabella married her cousin Gian Galeazzo Sforza, the heir to the Duchy of Milan, to strengthen ties between the Kingdom of Naples and the Duchy of Milan. Leonardo da Vinci was at that time in the service of Ludovico Sforza, Gian Galeazzo's uncle who was regent at the court of Milan. Isabella's young husband died prematurely at the age of 25 without having been able to exercise power, said to have been assassinated on his uncle's orders. The German historian Maike Vogt-Luerssen tells us that after her widowhood, Isabella and Leonardo formed a secret couple and had 5 children. So it is the portrait of his beloved that Leonardo da Vinci made, which explains why he took it to Amboise in France and kept it until the end of his life, as we keep a family photo nowadays. So there was an emotional bond with Isabella that did not exist with Lisa del Giocondo whose portrait was just a commission. The research I have done myself on the landscape indicates that it is based on an authentic place, which would confirm Maike Vogt-Luerssen's theory, as it probably pays tribute to Isabella of Aragon's family origins. It seems obvious to me that the identity of the character in this portrait has been confused between an order actually received, that of the silk merchant's wife, and the portrait of Leonardo's companion which is the one we see today at the Louvre. All of this is probably well known today to the so-called specialists of Leonardo da Vinci, who do not want to recognize the inconsistencies of the official version, because they have spent their whole life defending a version they know today is outdated. As Mark Twain said, "It's easier to fool people than to convince them they've been fooled".
Yes, and I own it. I found it back in January of 2018 in a Wealthy family estate, the previous owner died of old age. I bought it thru an antiques dealer in the UK. There were five master paintings in that collection that day in January of 2018. I bought the best one of the five paintings. It later turned out to be the most expensive painting in history. But alas Christie's So. Freemans etc.Auction houses all wont even give me the time of day to even consider it. I took it to the Antiques Roadshow fellow Sam Holden in Nashville Tennessee. He was blown away by it. Saying in his entire career This is the most important and expensive item hes ever seen. I have the second version of the master painting. possibly the first one made.
it's been proven the "faces"have excat same size and shape..don't know what you seeing...ua-cam.com/video/jMGlM_qbBd4/v-deo.html&ab_channel=CuriosityStreamBeta
But the one on right looks so fat face but original has a pale slender face with innocent look and colours are darker in background mona lisa face is not too white and fat broad forehead so obvious difference.
Love heart ashow Dream chartfilm on do Pass save drissling away Fan zoo to life moment Histore flight to leave Use know alive to map Zoo flow to deals funny Thick show no add but Do dream line to so Care do film live to know Then day roses life fly Haigh tend if right snow Mean if heart light to send Map word show stayle mint Luck do limt he's heart lovers mean feel to then Saying reading how search Away luck feed to low words . .
OMG!? This is obviously a fake. Right off Where is the vanishing point?? Inconsistent shadows. Eyes are wrong, nose is wrong. Hair is a joke. Maybe the sleeves were original and stopped painting once he was done with that study with someone(s) finishing the painting... At best.
Da Vinci in heaven be slapping his forehead listening to these people talk about this conspiracy.
😂
Lol
My mother visited Paris and the museum in the 60s. She said that the painting that is viewed to the public and what's in the museum is different she said that there is no photos of Moma Lisa . It's not allowed because fear of the photo flash would damage the painting. The original painting is not displayed in the museum to the public that it is in a volt. She also s
tated that the MONA LISA SHE VIEWED There WAS NO BACKGROUND OF MOUNTAINS AND VALLEYS IN THE BACKGROUND.
Yeah according to my research( more like info I gathered from the internet)on Leanardo Da Vinci he had a lot unfinshed projects and some went missing.
You are the chosen one the leader of earth I have a vision young lady
Blue Playz
Wut??
Is that supposed to mean?
ua-cam.com/video/Rj3L5clOwtM/v-deo.html
@@miracunini6078 ua-cam.com/video/Rj3L5clOwtM/v-deo.html
Adway Datta
0_0 huh!
I have a theory, what if, the 2nd one was drawn by a student of his.
Ö
3:30 I don't know if it's just me but the monalisa to the left was wearing a veil while the other isn't really wearing one just merely highlights it just to match the pic to the left
No you can see that she is wearing one too but its very subtle. Look at her left side of hair there is a covering over that hair
It wouldn't surprise me to learn Da Vinci played around with 3D.
Imagine if da Vinci just had a friend who liked the painting and wanted it so he made a copy of it
The character we see in the famous portrait at the Louvre is not that of Lisa del Giocondo or Mona Lisa, but that of Isabella of Aragon and Sforza, the daughter of the King of Naples Alfonso II of Aragon. Isabella married her cousin Gian Galeazzo Sforza, the heir to the Duchy of Milan, to strengthen ties between the Kingdom of Naples and the Duchy of Milan. Leonardo da Vinci was at that time in the service of Ludovico Sforza, Gian Galeazzo's uncle who was regent at the court of Milan. Isabella's young husband died prematurely at the age of 25 without having been able to exercise power, said to have been assassinated on his uncle's orders.
The German historian Maike Vogt-Luerssen tells us that after her widowhood, Isabella and Leonardo formed a secret couple and had 5 children. So it is the portrait of his beloved that Leonardo da Vinci made, which explains why he took it to Amboise in France and kept it until the end of his life, as we keep a family photo nowadays. So there was an emotional bond with Isabella that did not exist with Lisa del Giocondo whose portrait was just a commission. The research I have done myself on the landscape indicates that it is based on an authentic place, which would confirm Maike Vogt-Luerssen's theory, as it probably pays tribute to Isabella of Aragon's family origins.
It seems obvious to me that the identity of the character in this portrait has been confused between an order actually received, that of the silk merchant's wife, and the portrait of Leonardo's companion which is the one we see today at the Louvre. All of this is probably well known today to the so-called specialists of Leonardo da Vinci, who do not want to recognize the inconsistencies of the official version, because they have spent their whole life defending a version they know today is outdated.
As Mark Twain said, "It's easier to fool people than to convince them they've been fooled".
There are 3 mona Lisa's painted by da vinci at different times the 'famous one' in France is his preferred ver
I like the Isleworth, she looks real, the louvre plastic.
Wow
It is by him. They don’t want to de-value the original one that has been idolised for centuries. It’s always about money.
I think the second one is by Leonardo di Caprio
Yes, and I own it. I found it back in January of 2018 in a Wealthy family estate, the previous owner died of old age. I bought it thru an antiques dealer in the UK. There were five master paintings in that collection that day in January of 2018. I bought the best one of the five paintings. It later turned out to be the most expensive painting in history. But alas Christie's So. Freemans etc.Auction houses all wont even give me the time of day to even consider it. I took it to the Antiques Roadshow fellow Sam Holden in Nashville Tennessee. He was blown away by it. Saying in his entire career This is the most important and expensive item hes ever seen. I have the second version of the master painting. possibly the first one made.
art vibes
"This one doesn't have the changes" uuuh that is because it is said to be a second one, why would he keeo needing to change a copy?
This just freak me out
like, whats the point of copying it so closely but changing the background so drastically?
Jeffree Star Lady Gaga and Mona Lisa are the only people who look good without eyebrows
My daugther is drawing Mona Lisa
wow!
maybe the work of salai?
maybe a second version of the mona lisa from Davinci?
maybe a work of Fontainebleau ?
:D
Heart of Roxas the Salai theory seems interesting
😍😍😍😍🥰🥰🥰
Ye and it's in my house
what
Yes, definitely a second Mona Lisa, but hold on a minute, there's a third, and wouldn't you just know it, a fourth... Oh how we laughed!
The one in Paris is a picture of his Mother. Channeled info through Emmanuel McIntosh
Hi
This is an express not for 8 year for eyes
Is Leornado Davinci Leornado Dicaprio?
Waihong Tan moron
Yeap, he lives in LA
Did you not know that??
Second looks so funny fake rounded face so funny looking looks some body casual from road hahahahaOriginal best still .
it's been proven the "faces"have excat same size and shape..don't know what you seeing...ua-cam.com/video/jMGlM_qbBd4/v-deo.html&ab_channel=CuriosityStreamBeta
🤔
Haiiigh run to art ...
When cooler wet ĥot
do back to luck..too
dafaq
ua-cam.com/video/Rj3L5clOwtM/v-deo.html
Fake or Not. I think the one in question looks much better than the Known real one.
Guy2015 Nah
Absolutely 💯
Pshhhhhh it’s real!
ua-cam.com/video/Rj3L5clOwtM/v-deo.html
Lot of stolen art has been painted over
?😍😉
Doesn't look like a copy. Maybe a child or other relative.
Or the same woman when she was younger
It seems she used FaceApp 😂
@nah I work with the government you pay of the mona lisa, I want the mona lisa. We are not the same
What an annoying reporter. Try to speak normally.
There is a zportrait
True
Oulala
69th comment babyyyyy
U me be
She is not Mona Lisa. The real one is the handsome lady more gentle than the sun.
#Q #Qanon #FuckingEpic
But the one on right looks so fat face but original has a pale slender face with innocent look and colours are darker in background mona lisa face is not too white and fat broad forehead so obvious difference.
Love heart ashow
Dream chartfilm on do
Pass save drissling away
Fan zoo to life moment
Histore flight to leave
Use know alive to map
Zoo flow to deals funny
Thick show no add but
Do dream line to so
Care do film live to know
Then day roses life fly
Haigh tend if right snow
Mean if heart light to send
Map word show stayle mint
Luck do limt he's heart lovers mean feel to then
Saying reading how search
Away luck feed to low words . .
wut
AI?
The narrator is annoying.
Stopped watching at 1:06 when he days going to church to find answers.
Heeeheeee
Ze Bunker who cares what or when you did. Z-z-z-z
OMG!? This is obviously a fake. Right off Where is the vanishing point?? Inconsistent shadows. Eyes are wrong, nose is wrong. Hair is a joke. Maybe the sleeves were original and stopped painting once he was done with that study with someone(s) finishing the painting... At best.
Overrated painting, means nothing to me
roger scott and so you, too, are irrelevant.
@@hollygolightly8048 yes, we are