Regarding FNAF 3, I think there's further proof to this because phone dude mentioned that he looked like he could fit in with their horror-themed attraction. Since he would be a decaying corpse, that checks out.
thing is the fnaf 3 guard has lungs, the breathing when the vents go out proves it. Michael has 0 organs nor bones. Hudson is the fnaf 3 guard as stated by frights.
I genuinely think the movie is going to have its own continuity from the games, which is kinda sad but interesting. Unless some of the scenes are over separate years.
It'd be really hard to make a movie based on the first game without changing it. The story is hidden in the background and the game keeps us entertained through its gameplay and the mystery that the audience has to figure out and that certainly wouldn't work for a 3-hour movie
Not only do Smith and Schmidt sound similar, they’re actually the same name. Schmidt is just the German counterpart of the English Smith, and they both mean the same thing.
When Scott was giving hints on his website about the lore (this was after FNaF 4 but before FNaF World and during a GTLive event) one of the hints to solve the story was simply "Four games, one story". This to me says that the original 4 games are about 1 character, Micheal Afton. Why else would he think that quote would be helpful to solve the entire story (at that time).
One of my favorite theories is that you only play as Michael in the custom night of fnaf 2, because it implies that Jeremy Fitzgerald wasn't actually there for a greater purpose, but he was just some random night guard who was unusually determined to stay 5 nights plus an extra night for overtime, despite the fact that not only are there killer murder-bots out to get him, but there was an actual child murderer on the site like 5 hours before he needed to start his shift(which he wasn't supposed to have anyways, it's overtime hours). And to top it all off, he only gets like a hundred dollars per week. This is next level motivation, and fitzgerald has earned my respect
I actually remember hearing a theory that the reason Jeremy was so determined to stay there was because he was a private investigator investigating William who at the time was working a day shift security guard and by night 6 he either got killed by William or Michael convinced Jeremy to drop his investigation or just bite of 87
@@JohnShepherd117 He never died because Phone Guy says in fnaf 1 that ''it's amazing how the human body can survive without the frontal lobe'' or something like that, and he's talking about the bite of 87
what makes alot of sense is that since the toy bots have a predator database, the reason they become activated at night and follow you is because youre Afton
To add on to FNaF 4, the entire game is pretty much a nightmarish reimagining of the first game. Bonnie and Chica both attack from their usual sides, and Chica occasionally enters the kitchen, something she only previously did in FNaF 1. Foxy's closet is a clear parallel to Pirate's Cove, but since there aren't any cameras in FNaF 4, the acts of checking what phase he's in and shutting the door on him have been rolled into one. Freddy's a bit of an outlier, but I think fending the Freddles off is loosely based on power management. Let the Freddles pile up for too long and Freddy will kill you, just like if you get careless with power usage. All this combined with the Phone Guy cameo you mentioned, I think it's clear that FNaF 4 being a twisted version of FNaF 1 isn't just true from a gameplay perspective, but from a story perspective as well. Mike's experiences working the night shift are causing him to have these nightmares, either during or shortly after FNaF 1. As for the hospital equipment by the bed, it's probably Mike's memories of visiting his brother in the hospital. Working at Freddy's is likely digging up unwanted memories, which is also why Fredbear shows up and he appears in the dreams as a child. In his head, not only is he fighting off his fears of the animatronics, but the guilt of what he did as well.
There's also the room and its contents. It looks nothing like Crying Child's and it holds a toy phone, fan, purple robot, caterpillar toy, and the Foxy Plush in the closet still has his head.
@@Takejiro24 Yeah, in hindsight, that really should've given it away. Especially with the Fredbear plush being nowhere in the room despite literally following the crying child everywhere.
yeah but fnaf 4 just being a dream deosn't work becouse first it was litarelly conformnt in sister location that the fnaf 4 bedromom and plushtrap's hallway are real locations litraelly implying that the events of fnaf 4 somewhat happened in real life and also secound if we play as michael then why are we in the height of a child becouse if you look at the fnaf 4 gameplay we can tell that we are at the height of a child which if fnaf 4 is after fnaf 1 then it woudn't make sense since by the time both fnaf 2 and fnaf 1 happen michael is already an adult so waht is with that?
yeah but fnaf 4 just being a dream deosn't work becouse first it was litarelly conformnt in sister location that the fnaf 4 bedroom and plushtrap's hallway are real locations litraelly implying that the events of fnaf 4 somewhat happened in real life and also secound if we play as michael then why are we in the height of a child becouse if you look at the fnaf 4 gameplay we can tell that we are at the height of a child which if fnaf 4 is after fnaf 1 then it woudn't make sense since by the time both fnaf 2 and fnaf 1 happen michael is already an adult so waht is with that?
One of Molten Freddy’s lines in pizza sun all but confirms its Micheal, as the “TOGETHER AGAIN!” Would perfectly reference how they were… yknow. Inside Micheal as robot spaghetti for a while.
Thinking of the gravestones in the hill, is Mike is purposefully using the names of his father’s victims as his aliases as the various restaurants? Fritz and Jeremy? Maybe the repeated names in the series aren’t just coincidental. This could be to honor their memory in an odd way, or to lure his father to him so he mistakes his son as a loose end to tie up.
Also! Another detail in UCN that suggests that it's William who we're playing as is that if you get to the red lake easter egg - the background sound is the reversed audio of his voice actor screaming the names of Henry and Mike. FNAF 4 confuses me, I think that's the game that got messed around the most bc of the fnaf narrative shift. Despite us not actually knowing too much about him, Michael is one of my favorite characters!
To add to Micheal being the protag of fnaf 3, In the book "Gumdrop Angel", we have a story called "What we found". This story is about a guy working the night shift at Fazbear's fright: The horror attraction". In this story, a new old animatronic is found and brought in: namely Springtrap. For the remainder of the book, the protagonist is getting hallucinations involving various fnaf characters (such as Chika, Bonnie, Foxy etc.) and it is made very clear that Springtrap is a stand in for the protagonist's step dad. The protagonist for example, remembers a time his abusive step-dad broke his arm, and then, Springtrap does so too. In the end, the protagonist admits to himself that he killed his step-dad by starting a fire at their family home. Now, this is ofc not a 1 to 1 retelling of fnaf 3 (The protagonist goes by the name Hudson, and has no previous connections to Freddy's. His step father also isn't a murderer, just some abusive guy. He also doesn't have any siblings i think), none of the stories in the fazbear frights are, however, they often hold close parrallelles with the games or explain certain things that happen in the games. The fact that this is the most obvious nod to a specific game in any of these books makes it a strong contestant for being a "hey, look into this one, it might be explaining some things you're missing" kind of story. And with the main character having set a fire to get rid of his father-figure, as well as the father figure of the nightgaurd in FF:THA literally being the embodyment of Springtrap, wouldn't make it too unlikely that this is a nod at the idea of the fnaf 3 nightgaurd being "Springtrap's son". And as Springtrap ofc is William, this would only really have Michael as an option.
My best guess for fnaf 4 is both. You play as cc/evan for nights 1-5 and you play as Michael on night 6 since that night (like most night 6's) are canon. To me it makes more sense if cc was the one experiencing night 5, its a 1 on 1 between him and the animatronic he seems to fear the most. In night 6 you play as Michael, someone who wasn't afraid of any of the animatronics but probably got traumatized after seeing one kill his brother in an event that was entirely his fault.
@@Zelkz01 Maybe a dream in Michael's case? It's never been hard confirmed whether the nightmare animatronics were dreams or the result of audio illusion disc, but we do know that both Michael and cc have both at least seen nightmare fredbear. So it could go either way. Thats just my best guess tho
also forgot to mention. The bedroom in fnaf 4 looks nothing like ccs bedroom in the mini-games. So that's more reason to believe something else is going on
So apparently on Universals website it actually states that Mike is “haunted by the unsolved disappearance of his younger brother more than a decade before” Now this could just be misleading us from what actually happens, much like how the same synopsis states that Matthew Lillard plays “Steve Raglan, Mike’s smug career counselor”, but if Mike and micheal do end up being separate, it’s still safe to assume there’s going to be a lot of parallels between both characters
Sister Location also heavily hints at Michael being the night guard in FNaF 3, if he's not the night guard in FNaF 3 that secret ending is practically pointless
@@burner555 we already knew he survived the fire because of the “it burns” newspaper clipping showing him in the background of that clipping after beating the game, we didn't need sister location to tell us William was still alive
fnaf 2 wouldnt be micheal as right before fnaf 2 is when afton started his reverse aliving spree, as described by the phone guy saying someone used a yellow suit in the back and none of the animatronics are actigin right. the spree and hauntings
i saw a theory that william put both his kids though the nightmare experiments, doing it to michael to punish him for defending his sibling, leading him to be a jerk to his sibling in the mini games in 4. also saw a video about one of the books, with the character being a michael stand in, where he wakes up in sister location and last recalled being in the nightmare experiments and thinking he was much younger or maybe even though he was the sibling.
The fnaf 4 situation is... very complicated. Do I think that, at least in some capacity, Michael is the protagonist of fnaf 4? Yes. The fnaf survival logbook all but confirms this. However, when you start getting into *why* Michael is fnaf 4's protagonist, things go out of control very quickly. I've seen a few theories floating around, and I'll try addressing them (in addition to providing my own take on the matter). It really does seem like fnaf 4 takes place during / after fnaf 1 because of the confusing layout of the house and the phone guy easter egg. Many have speculated that Michael is having nightmares between his shifts, which is a fair assumption. The logbook does talk about *recent* dreams after all. People have suggested that maybe Evan (CC)'s spirit is reaching out to Mike through his dreams. Again, I find that to be a nice narrative. The flashes of an IV, pills, and flowers certainly support this idea. There's just one tiny detail that calls the whole thing into question, needlessly complicating things as per usual with this series. If we assume that fnaf 4 is Michael's dream, or a shared dream with his brother, then the Nightmare animatronics' death lines from UCN make absolutely no sense. In UCN we play as William, obviously. In that game, there are some specific voice lines I'd like to call attention to. Nightmare Freddy says "I am given flesh to be your tormentor." Yeah, okay, fine. If he were a dream, he wouldn't be real, so he now "has flesh" whereas he didn't before. That's well and dandy, except for the fact that Nightmare Fredbear says to William "I assure you, I am very real," and "This time, there is more than an illusion to fear." Dream, illusion, it's all just lofty language that could be seen as interchangeable if you really squint at it. But, you have to keep in mind who these lines are directed toward. William is the one who created... I don't want to say it, but he made illusion discs. I know, it's a very controversial topic in this community. Anyway, the fact that Fredbear brings up illusions specifically seems like an oddly deliberate detail. Also, why the hell does Fredbear even say these things to William? He shouldn't really need to. That is, unless William has seen the nightmare animatronics before, and he *knows* that they aren't supposed to be real; merely illusions. Otherwise, why would William even need convincing that the nightmares in UCN are real? So, I present to you now three different possibilities (all of which involve William being responsible for the creation of the nightmare animatronics): 1) William gives Evan nightmares in 1983, and Evan transfers his experiences to Michael during / after fnaf 1 2) William gives Michael nightmares sometime between 1983 and fnaf 1 which he then re-experiences during / after fnaf 1 3) William gives both Evan *and* Michael the same nightmares in 1983, which Michael is now re-experiencing during / after fnaf 1 These all seem... somewhat plausible to me, but I'd like to go into detail about my reasoning for each. For the first possibility, the idea is that William, in his effort to keep his son away from the restaurants, makes him scared of animatronics using illusions. It's cut and dry, and it's supported by the easter eggs in fnaf sl that link it to fnaf 4. As for the second, the idea is also kinda straightforward. William needs to test out his illusion discs or something, perhaps he wants to take out his anger and grief for Evan on the one who got him killed, or maybe he's just torturing Michael cause he feels like it; we all know he'd do that. This prompts him to give Michael nightmares using the discs. Now, it's the third possibility that I find more interesting. This is the idea that I personally support. Why? Well, first I should probably explain why I even consider this to be a possibility, because on paper it seems to make no sense. My hypothesis is that the illusion discs aren't an exact science. What I mean by that is, while William may have intended to only give nightmares to Evan, the disc affects anyone who's in close proximity to it. That includes Michael. While that explains how this could be possible, it doesn't explain why I like this idea so much. The reason I like it has to do with character motivation. If these two are both experiencing nightmares in 1983, it not only explains why Evan is so scared of the restaurants, but it also explains why Michael is such a jerk. They're both afraid; they just express it in different ways. BUT HEY, THAT'S JUST A THEORY-
@@jhtoxic7870 Okay. If that is the case, I’m curious as to why he doodled nightmare fredbear in the survival logbook. And, I’m also wondering what exactly the character encyclopedia states that suggests he isn’t the protagonist, because I personally don’t own a copy.
@@452pokemaster well, we don’t have a concrete answer as to how Michael knew about Nightmare Fredbear it’s possible, he may have had visions of him brought upon by Golden Freddy, he has the ability to cause hallucinations and it’s theorized that he’s possessed by the crying child.
@@jhtoxic7870 I mean, even if we consider that to be the case, it doesn’t explain all the Fnaf 1 Easter eggs in Fnaf 4. Scott said himself in a post that he didn’t include any random Easter eggs in that game. Between the grandfather clock chimes in Fnaf 1, the suspiciously similar layout of the bed room and the Fnaf 1 office, and the phone guy calls from Fnaf 1, it seems like the Fnaf 1 and Fnaf 4 protagonists are actually the same person. If not Micheal, then who is the protagonist of the 4th game? Evan? If that’s what you think, then hear me out on this. What if Evan and Micheal are *both* the protagonists of the 4th game? And by that, I don’t mean something stupid like Evan being the mini games’ protagonist and Micheal being the main game’s protagonist. I mean that the nightmare animatronics are their shared experience, which was created by William. Wouldn’t you know it, I already suggested that in the comment you’ve been replying to. Maybe you want to reread it so I don’t have to explain it again?
@@jhtoxic7870 Don't take The Character Encyclopedia seriously, it's a cash grab written by a bunch of different ghost writers who knew next to nothing about the series
Just another detail I noticed, Mike **Schmitz** sounds like a low effort fake last name you'd think of on the spot. It's hilarious how cartoon it actually sounds. Like two kids in a trench coat going up to a cashier asking for alcohol, then when asked for their name they say something like "uhhh... Fritz... *Schmitz*-"
Fantastic first video, editing and information is great and well assembled in a approachable manner. Once the views come in you will definitely hit the big time. Very good vid 😊😊😊
It has been my personal belief for awhile now that we play as Mike during the nights and CC during the mini games. While it is easy to say it could be both during the nights-Scott isn't a stranger to complicated intricacies like that-I don't think so. Not only is it so needlessly complicated for no reason, but there is no actual evidence to suggest that we play as CC. Be it the Logbook, the room being different or the phone call, all signs point to it being Mike. As for the flower, pills and IV easter eggs, those are likely a guilty reminder to Mike as to what he did to his brother. Hell, if you're a believer in the two spirits in Golden Freddy theory, then the appearance of Nightmare and Fredbear could be a spin on two spirits (CC and Cassidy) haunting Mike in his dreams for what he did. This could be to parallel William's later living nightmare as seen in The Man in Room 1280. Specifically, Cassidy would be Fredbear because she seems to be the one in control of the Golden Freddy suit whilst CC would be Nightmare, made obvious by the human brain calling back to the injury that caused his untimely death. To be clear, I don't think this would literally be CC and Cassidy, but yet another aspect of Mike's nightmare influenced by what he's seen at the different Freddy's locations.
Well the hospital equipment wouldn’t be there if we were playing as Foxy bro Also there is absolutely no evidence we play as Foxybro during the night in Fnaf 4
@@yukinyx3983 okay maybe it was guilt. How about the player character being the size of a toddler compared to the bed and doors or the bedroom obviously being a child’s bedroom with purple phones and stuff Is that guilt too? Cause if the 1983 fredbite happened when Foxybro was about a teenager shouldn’t he at least seem like a teenager
Wasn't expecting to find another person who also has (somewhat) of the same theories as to which games Michael was the protagonist of, but here we are! Amazing video by the way ^^
Another thing to note about FNAF 4 is that the Crying Child's room in the minigames doesn't match up with his room in each night. C.C.'s room is completely empty, save for the plushies, a bed, and nightstand. The room also only has one door and does not connect to any other hallway, with the room also lacking a closet. This could be Michael's room, since we don't know what it looks like, but the problem is the Afton household has a completly different architecture in Midnight Motorist, so who knows anymore.
My theory regarding the FNAF 3 protag is that yes, it *is* Henry, the Phantoms somewhat torn state can be a metaphorical way to show how Henry feels about the animatronics; prisons of his own making, with the torn up states representing the damage he thought he'd done. And also, I don't think he intentionally caused Fazbear Frights to burn down, I think it actually *was* due to faulty wiring, upon seeing the damage done to William after this incident went down, that's what gave Henry the idea that fire is the weakness, and setting up the plan to burn all the monsters haunting the Fazbear Brand to ashes in FNAF 6.
This was really awesome! personally I still think Mike is alive, my idea is that as father and son Michael has to forcibly live forever until every bit of William, along with the rest of the agony is completely gone. Even though it's pretty much confirmed William is dead, we still have The Mimic that needs to be stopped. We may not see him currently, but I have a feeling our zombie hero is still alive and kicking doing stuff in the background.
Nah, It's hinted that Michael WANTED to die at the end of fnaf 6 judging by what Henry said in the connection termination speech. "There was a way planned out for you, but I don't think you would want that." Also his remnant probably burned in the fire (Because literally everyone else died).
@@ChrisTheCrap No no I'm saying Michael literally is forced to live, he does want to die but because of his remnant and agony it's keeping him alive. He's stuck in a state of reanimated torment until he gets rid of every bit of evil. I get what you mean with everyone dying in FNaF 6 so it's possible he might as well have passed on, but still it's just a fun idea to think about lol.
@@ChrisTheCrap Which is still a storytelling failure in my book. Micheal had no indication that opening the restaurant would set up a conclusion to his quest and depending on player input, he may not even follow up on the animatronics showing up. To me, it looks like he just wanted to do something with his future days and happened to stumble into Henry's trap by pure chance.
I am completely sure you play as Michael in all, with the exception of recent installments and fnaf world you play as Cassidy. Of course Michael is only the night guard for the last night of fnaf 2 but aside from that. I genuinely believe you play as Michael in all games.
To be honest, im pretty sure that the FNAF 4 location is a distorted child's bedroom, with slight hints of the FNAF 1 location, using the illusion disks to make everything look worse. The pills and such probably serve as reminders of what Michael caused.
@@fuckthisstupidasshandleshit no it doesn't. the minigames depict a child, but nowhere in the nights does it confirm that you play as one. Now to you, my friend, let me tell you why I think he's Michael. Firstly, the bedroom, and the house in general, are structured in a very abnormal way. 2 doors leading into separate hallways. This is reminiscent of the FNAF 1 location, showing 2 doors leading into separate hallways. Now what does this mean? Well, it's basically confirmed that Michael worked at the FNAF 1 location under a fake name. The paycheck lists him as "Mike Schmidt". This is also supported by the distorted phone call that can sometimes be heard. The logbook states that Michael has at least seen Nightmare Fredbear before, implying that he has been in a similar situation at the very least. As for the minigames, we all know that Michael put the child into Fredbear's mouth. Interestingly, they usually involve Michael doing something to him, like scaring him or locking him in a closet. I think these are traumatic memories of what happened on that day, coming back to haunt Michael. FNAF 4 happens after FNAF 1 and Michael is the protagonist.
@@enderslayer0848 "In this last chapter of the Five Nights at Freddy's original story, you must once again defend yourself against Freddy Fazbear, Chica, Bonnie, Foxy, and even worse things that lurk in the shadows. **Playing as a child whose role is yet unknown, you must safeguard yourself until 6am by watching the doors, as well as warding off unwanted creatures that may venture into your closet or onto the bed behind you.**" - FNAF 4 Steam Description. You are wrong. So what? That's not confirmation. Note that it's distorted. You'd never hear it in regular gameplay, even if you listened. Because Michael sees Nightmare Fredbear, he does the nights? Does that mean the game devs of FNAF AR did every single night? And your evidence? Wrong. FNAF 4's protagonist is the Crying Child, who died in 1983. FNAF 1 takes place in 2003.
@@fuckthisstupidasshandleshit first of all the steam descriptions are dubious at best, calling Freddy Fazbear "Freddybear" and such. Secondly, a Steam description is pretty shoddy evidence that you play as the crying child. For example, Dream Theory was likely the original ending. if we're going based on that, then yes, the crying child would be the protagonist, hence the description reflecting that. However, that was retconned, being very much non-canon, and now the protagonist is left ambiguous and the description being worthless. Thirdly, the phone call can happen randomly in your night. Sure, it's reversed, but why would it be there otherwise? FNAF doesn't do coincidences. They could have played a simple stock garbling sound, but they didn't. Michael has seen Nightmare Fredbear, and there's a good chance he saw the other nightmares as well. Especially considering that he is asked if he had nightmares before the image. Also, FNAF AR's characters are as non-canon as it gets. Using that as a source is pretty stupid, to be honest. Lastly, FNAF 1 takes place in 1993, evidenced by the paycheck. The "20 years" line is either an exaggeration, or Scott not thinking too far ahead. The animatronics are also very much inspired by animatronic mascots from the 90s. 2003 is not the year that FNAF 1 takes place in. Get your game theory ass outta here and come back with a solid theory.
9:01 id like to think that Glam Freddy is Michael or has his spirit in a way as he tells us that hes been at the FNaF6 pizzeria before and hes helping a kid who looks vaguely like his brother and wants to make amends in a way
Considering that FNaF history started in 1983 (FNaF 4) and ended in FNaF 6 (approx. 2026-2028) and that Michael was about 15 years old in FNaF 4, he concluded his history in the franchise between 58 and 60 years (more approx. 59 years old) The guy at least lived a long time, since he reached the elderly stage. If he didn't die in FNaF 6 as some theorize, by now he must be enjoying his retirement.
He probably didn't live a good life from what we can tell though, he lived with a serial killer father, he accidentally killed his younger brother, which might or might have not caused Afton to commit child murders, he got scooped by her dead little sister who was possessing an animatronic and then said sister and her friends live inside your skin, causing Michael to be a walking dead corpse, he feels guilty for what his father did again he thinks its his fault because of the bite of 83. He lived with that guilt for 40+ years, can't really blame him for wanting to be burned along with what is little left of his original family, Elizabeth and William (although they insane now) release the agony of those who died due to Afton's mental instability, these is why i think his 100% dead, who can live a normal life after all that happened? The only reason Michael probably continued living and didn't k*** himself was because of the guilt of what happened to his brother and trying to redeem himself, and end his fathers deadly legacy.
Apparently some things have been confirmed lately because of the new books: -fnaf 4 nightmares aren’t attached to illusion disks anymore, but to some kind of gas that makes you see and believe things ( it has also been confirmed to be Micheal who experiences those). -the events of fnaf 1 happen before sl, so now the motive of our firing as Michael afton (odor) isn’t because of body decay
@@animeman6599 Here's the thing, they are and aren't. Some STORIES are outright said to be canon, some are said to be connected as in they give hints at what happened, and others are outright stated to not be true.
I think in FNAF 4 1-5 we play as C.C but Night 6-8 we play as Michael. Those nightmares began after Mike accidentally killed his brother. The hospital references is The GUILT he feels And he experience this nightmares even when he is adult and this incredibly describes how much Michael misses his brother and how much guilt he feels. Even if he completes night 8, it is still not over. Those nightmares affected him so much that in FNAF 3 it transformed into hallucinations.
THIS WAS SO MUCH FUN AHHHHHH!!! I really enjoyed this, and there a lot of times I was like "yeah this makes sense actually!" and the one off with freddy being like "no, that's...yeah...freddy" LMAO. I never thought of that Frtiz Smith theory before, but it MAKES sense, unless they just got lazy and forgot to change the slip.
I say this on every third FNAF video, but my sister and I had a theory we play as the big brother in FNAF4’s bonus nights while the Crying Child’s dead/dying since it came out. It of course hit even harder once we started learning who these characters really were.
For the fnaf two on the night 7, I think it’s phone guy, considering how he said he’d take over the Night Shift the next day. Also, we didn’t get a phone call from him. The odor? Well, after night 6, Jeremy has the day shift, and that’s when the bite of ‘87 happened. Phone guy must’ve taken the body somewhere, making him have a bad odor.
Okay sorry if this upsets who ever reads this for bring this up but fnaf 4 is Michael experiencing the memories of children William kidnapped using circus babies and who under went the fear gas experiment explaining why the background keeps changing. Now the part that’s confusing is how could Michael experience someone else’s memories? Well that answer is that the scooper can receive and distribute remnant and after Michael had is guts ripped out he had those memories injected into him when the scooper stabbed him. Also the fnaf 4 house is on the security map.
Just want to point something out, odor doesn't really mean much, as Scott confirmed it's a joke, phone guy said it's from the aminitronics, and sister location is confirmed to happen after follow me (which is after fnaf 1) and 10 years after the bite of 83, also Mike is still helping William until fnaf ar. (Plus that midnight motorist joke is inaccurate now, since we have a confirmed conclusion for midnight motorist, since it's confirmed that it's Williams vicitm)
One thing you're not considering is that micheal was like 10 or 12 in 1983 before killing his brother, so if he would work in fnaf 2 pizzeria he would be like 14-18 years old, in fnaf 1 he would be 20-25, fnaf 1 could maybe be played as micheal but for me fnaf 2 is definitely not
For FNAF2 : I like to believe Jeremy is temporary guard who just had a bad week with haunted animatronics 😅😅 .. kind of like side characters in anime while one person is doing this , the other character is doing something else….. basically while Mike is at Fnaf 1 location messing with the animatronics Jeremy is having a bad week. Faz corp doesn’t care 🤷🏾♂️ Mike gets wind of this and goes to FNAF2 location on night 7 with a different Alias because he was just fired 😂😂
Nice video man, congratulations. But I would like to put my view about this topic: 𝙁𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙉𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩𝙨 𝙖𝙩 𝙁𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙙𝙮'𝙨 : Yes, Mike = Michael and it has references to Sister Location in the Survival Log Book just like you showed. Btw the dismissal for odor I find it hard to be because of Michael, I suppose it's the animatronics themselves because in the game's newspapers it is said that they stink (because of the rotten bodies inside them). 𝙁𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙉𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩𝙨 𝙖𝙩 𝙁𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙙𝙮'𝙨 𝟮 :No, because Michael didn't know about the possessed animatronics until FNaF 1 (in the Survival Log Book it is said that he started working there just because of the money and free Pizza), and FNaF 2 takes place before 1. 𝙁𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙉𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩𝙨 𝙖𝙩 𝙁𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙙𝙮'𝙨 𝟯 : No, in Pizzeria Simulator the Scraptrap says: "You may not recognize me at first, but I assure you, it's still me", so Michael cannot have witnessed FNaF 3. And btw, Phone Dude says on the first night: "Like, the attraction opens in like, a week, so we have to make sure everything works, and nothing catches on fire! [...] Some of this equipment is barely functional Yeah, I-I wasn't joking about the fire that's-that's-that's a real risk.", thus giving a foreshadow of the endgame. 𝙁𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙉𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩𝙨 𝙖𝙩 𝙁𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙙𝙮'𝙨 𝟰 : kinda yeah, the FNaF Encyclopedia says that the nights are C.C's nightmares after the bite, but apparently during the events of FNaF 1 C.C's soul tries to communicate via nightmares (?), or the Michael coincidentally had nightmares similar to C.C. 𝙁𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙉𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩𝙨 𝙖𝙩 𝙁𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙙𝙮'𝙨 : 𝙎𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙇𝙤𝙘𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 : "Father...It's me Michael..." 𝙁𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙉𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩𝙨 𝙖𝙩 𝙁𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙙𝙮'𝙨 : 𝙋𝙞𝙯𝙯𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙖 𝙎𝙞𝙢𝙪𝙡𝙖𝙩𝙤𝙧: Yes, and you already explained why.
@@Beellkax 1. Part of Fazbear Frights was based on the Log Book, it's something that existed way before FNaF 3. It doesn't mean that Michael participated in FNaF 3. 2. Phone Guy also likes Foxy, does that mean he was in FNAF 3? Please read the FNAF 3 part from my original comment
Imo Scraptrap's line means that Mike may not recognise William because his Scraptrap/Afton suit is different from the Springtrap/Springbonnie suit, which in my interpretation confirms Mike working at FNAF 3
Mike schmidt - fnaf Jeremy fitzgerald - fnaf 2 Fritz smith - fnaf 2 Hudson foster - fnaf 3 Young michael afton - fnaf 4 Michael afton - fnaf sister location Angsty Teen - fnaf sister location Eggs benedict - fnaf sister location Stanley - fnaf (Room for one more) Michael afton - fnaf pizzeria simulator And Gregory and cassie - fnaf security breach
@@william5356 If Scott hadn't made Sister Location and any of the games (and the logbook) afterwards, then yeah it would've been Evan but then it got changed to Michael.
I pretty much agree with everything said in this video however I do kinda wish you delved more into some of theories of who we could've been playing as in each game
what I find kind of funny about the thumbnail is that FNaF 1-4 and pizzeria simulator has their normal game icons/photos and then there's Sister location
5:10 I get it! Like, legit, I just solved it. The nightmares have been stated in UCN to be illusions, which, in this franchise, means illusion disks (yeah, those things). That means it’s entirely possible for Micheal Afton to have seen the Nightmare animatronics
As i heared the pink slip in fnad 1 and 2 at the end of custom night says tempering with the animatronics bacause at custom night youre the one whos changeing their AI from 1 to 20 so at custom nights jeremy and mike probably just did something to the animatronics unprofessionally to be able to change how agressive they are
Now if we sit crooked and speak correctly: 1- FNAF 3 If the night watchman sees animatronics from FNAF 1 and 2 as hallucinations. He must have worked in both places and must try to prevent the animatronics from harming him. This brings us directly to the FNAF 1-2-3 Night watchman as Micheal Afton. Because after the Michael SL incident, there is a walking corpse, since 1993-2023 is a long time, a normal person must either die or age, but Michael lives forever because of the residue. 2- We can play Nightmare BB Minigame in FNAF 4, which means that the person who survived the night is working in FNAF 2. 3- The behavior of the animatronics in FNAF 4 is very similar to game 1 and 2. As in FNAF 1, Bonnie comes from the left and Chica comes from the right. Chica's sound in FNAF 4 kitchen as in FNAF 1, Foxy's own private space like in FNAF 1 and disappearing like in FNAF 2. Freddy jumpscares at us from behind like in FNAF 1
something you forgot to mention is that michael in sister location explicitly tells his father he is going to go find him so yeah, he might be the FNAF 3 security guard
FNaF 1 - Def Michael, says his name and all FNaF 2 - Likely Michael on at least custom night but not for certain. The repeated use of the word ‘odour’ makes me believe it’s Mike. FNaF 3 - No proof but very likely. The fact they were working at the attraction after being a real FNaF night guard (hallucinates animatronics) and tried burning the place down tells me it’s Mike looking, finding and attempting to end his father. FNaF 4 is likely Mike again but could be about the crying child (CC). The guidebook hints at it being Mike in a nightmare. Phone guy in FNaF 1 says that “it’s amazing how someone can live without the frontal lobe” when talking about the ‘bite of 87’ so it’s very possible CC was hospitalised before dying, hence the hospital items that Mike sees. It makes sense that he’d feel guilty for hospitalising and killing his brother. Fredbear; CC’s murdered also appears in the game which says a lot. FNaF World: Yeah no Sister location: We know this is Mike due to the spring-trap cutscene at the end of the game. Pizzaria sim: Henry’s speech at the end of the game talks about the guard not wishing to leave and survive. This is Michael staying to make sure his father burns. UCN - It could be him but it’s very unlikely and a lot of the death voice lines wouldn’t make sense in this case. Help wanted and security breach - I don’t know enough about the lore post Pizzeria sim but Henry and Mike died so I doubt it’s him
I quite like the Michael is Glamrock freddy theory- because its almost as if he wanted to right his wrongs with his brother, or at least help another child through a scary thing that happened to them, almost like he saw Gregory as his own little brother during the events of security breach
Its 100% confirmed we play as michael in fnaf 3 as william and scrap baby, recognise him, elizabeth has only seen michael during sister location and William obviously saw him during fnaf 3, if baby is able to recognise him and scrap trap can as well, then michael is 100% the player of fnaf 3 no doubt abt it
The thing that makes Mike being Fritz Smith unlikely is that 1. Fritz taking up the night shift correlates up when phone guy says “I’ll probably take the night shift myself” 2. Phone guy died to the FNAF 1 animatronics so he can’t be Mike because he died from getting scooped; plus Mike and phone guy’s recordings coexist in FNAF 1 so I doubt Mike would be listening to prerecorded messages of himself eventually listening to his own death that didn’t even happen. It seems more likely to me that Sister Location and FNAF 2 occur at around the same time and Elizabeth Afton getting scooped is the “bite” victim instead-freeing up Jeremy Fitzgerald to be Mike instead. Of course this theory has the weird flaw of if Baby is the bitter why are the Toy Animatronics canned, but that can be maneuvered around by William making Fazbear Entertainment use only the core 4 to avoid future accidents from the more advanced toy and Funtime animatronics while also covering his tracks so no one learns of his involvement. It’s also entirely possible that due to the series retcons that FNAF 2 no longer matters to the lore outside of giving Phone Guy a backstory.
Fnaf 3's location is drawn in the logbook, and Fazbear's Frights "What we found" is about a nightguard named Hudson who works at Fazbears Frights and is imagining that Springtrap is his father, since that one isnt in Stotchline, that is just a parallel universe story so we can probably take mike as fnaf 3 guard since we know who Springtrap is and who his son is
There was a theory back in the day that I don't agree with but there is evidence for it. The theory is that we do play as Michael in UCN, the proof being is that William didn't interact with all of the animatronics in ucn, Micheal for the most part did (except for old man consequences), the line "the one you should not have killed" could be the crying child, and the crying child made this personal purgatory for Michael for his sin of killing his young brother. Now what I believe is that it is a personal hell for William Afton and it was made by the spirit haunting Golden Freddy, this spirit is more selfish and that's where the line the one you shouldn't have killed comes into play.
in ucn you are playing as a mike and here is why: 1. you see mike's nightmares 2. animatronics tell you the one you schouldn't have killed(it's evan if it's text to wiliam then that don't make any sens becouse wiliam schouldn't kill any of this kids) 3. susie(chica)talk with evan before mike kill him(susie is kid with toys in fnaf 4 compare her with susie in fruity maze) 4. you can escape ucn mike kill only his brother by a mistake evan is taking revenge on him(wiliam won't be able to escape he kill 16 kids and he know what he is doing if you can escape ucn then that isn't hell and there isn't william 5. baby in ucn after killing us say wanna see a scooping room(mike was only scooped person) 6. nightmares talk to us like we meet them before 7. Most of scrapbaby voicelines is to mike(some are about paragraf 4) And golden freddy is evan 1. Cassidy is one of 16 killed by wiliam kids he don't have reason to be special 2. William in logbook is asking golden freddy if he still have nightmares(evan was tortured by william in room from fnaf 4. William was creating hallutinations to kids in this room by gas) 3.it's me(golden freddy always say it to mike he is trying to tell mike that he is still there) 4. Golden freddy show himself I'm not trying to say that william is free he also have his ucn without nightmares springtrap scraptrap and without escape but that ucn we are playing is mike pure.scott left himself way to bring old characters back to life if scott make william alive in later games then all other characters will be alive becouse of agony.
I went to check your channel for more videos like this and was really surprised when i found out this is your first one (not including shorts) Really good video and great editing!
yeah in the encyclopedia it didn't mention the missing kids either well it need to cause the missing kids are important cause they missing dead & possessing 5 different animatronics & is literally part of the lore
fnaf world (and other non-troll games that scott claims aren't canon) i like to believe are dreams or coma experiences inside of one of the characters heads after being unconscious, not only does this reflect the concept of The Desolate Hope (you traverse these dream like simulations happening within the minds of various robots, filled with wacky little enemies, several of which appearing in freddy in space 1) but fnaf world's map is shaped like a brain and has fredbear as a constant companion (the fnaf 4 crying atari bite little brother kid), but ucn is also canonically william's hell, not only does UCN have direct code connections to Fnaf world such as the OMC trophy, but UCN is really similar to SLCN which i believe is michael after being scooped and worn (you wont die, but youll wish you did) as a bunch of assorted funtimes are there instead of the usual ennard, also a notable lack of circus baby which during the development of SL was originally not going to be a part of ennard at all, hinted by the lack of her suit in the scooping room and how she can be seen with an intact endo while ennard is fully intact behind her, with scott retconning this because it went over everyone's heads so he ended up making the argument thing in the teaser source code to make it look like baby was ejected.
Fnaf 4 is literally a mix of Michael's experiences: It has 2 doors as fnaf 1 and you light them as fnaf 2 vents In middle there's a closet resembling hallway since foxy is there and he seem to avoid light too. And plushtrap must be either springbonnie plushie or just a memory of springtrap. Also there are nightmare ballon boy, marionette and mangle wich are from fnaf 2. And we know Michael plays in fnaf 4 due to the fnaf 1 call that plays. So Michael is possibly the guard in fnaf 2 too. Also don't forget nightmare fredbear. His mouth resembles bite of 83 and his stomach resembles Elizabeth's death
I think Scott decided at the end of the series that he wanted afton to be the main villian and the main hero be his son, micheal, its a cool concept son vs father, so I think Scott made later games to imoly we always played as Mike until fnaf 6
8:00 actually some of the special voicelines imply that you play as multiple people. Most are as William though since it's his hell. But for certain exclusive 20 level options, the deaths sound less evil. Like for Old Man Consequences, the main character drowns himself leaving "him" to his fate. For that one, we most likely play as Henry. Since from his assumption, he avenged his daughter's death and had no reason to stay around anymore.
After watching the movie, you mention the pill bottles in FNAF 4, and well, Mike has pill bottles in the movie and it is seen very often. Perhaps it is something to look into?
I think we are playing as mike in ucn bc puppet says "I don't hate you but you should stay out of my way" and "The others are like animals but i am very aware" plus at the easter egg of the old man consequences it says "Leave the demons to his demons. Rest ur own soul. There is nothing else."
Fnaf 1: Definitely Michael with a fake surname. Fnaf 2: I don’t know actually. Fnaf 3: Makes sense for Mike wanting to kill William by setting the building on fire. But how he knew that the establishment found William is beyond me since Michael shouldn’t even know his location. Sister Location: We already know the answer to this. Pizzeria Simulator: Definitely
Mike could have probably been visiting every location related to Freddy's in some way hoping to see his father in one of them, or just was invested in the fact that they were revisiting old locations, hoping they would find him somewhere (Which they did)
People always talking about how Micheal could be glamrock freddy, but what if Henry possesses Freddy instead? After all he did say that he was remaining close to the inferno
I personally think that the FNAF 3 protagonist is some random nightguard, solely because it would be 2023 and no one would hire a corpse. Michael only got the FFPS job because Henry wouldn't care, probably.
Why would Springtrap care about one random guy and, if it is a random guy, who the hell would work MULTIPLE NIGHTS knowing there's a robot-zombie trying to reach them?
Micheal is immortal, you know that, right? And whos to say Henry didnt create the fazbear frights company to *especially* stop his deranged former business partner?
Unrelated to this video but I find it funny how people don't notice that in the fnaf 2 drawings it is shown that the kids have seen golden freddy themselves.
If fnaf 2 takes place in 1987, why would there be a reason for Michael to work there? Nonetheless, this is a really well made video. Keep up the good work!
@@hamcheese3532matpat himself said he cant quite solve that since micheal begins is journey in 1993 even though the fnaf 2 animatronics have since been scrapped since 1987
Michael probably just needs a job. Getting a job at a place his father has a connection to would probably be a good idea. He’d have to be 14 in 1983, so he could be 18 in 1987. Seems like he is a teenager when he gets his brother *nommed.* He also just works at the FNAF 1 location for the free pizza, iirc.
Actually in fnaf world if you get the clock ending its revealed you're playing as who we assume to be Charlotte emily or the crying child as they set up the fnaf 3 good ending minigames for Michael to find and complete.
i believe you play as Phone Guy in the 7th night in fnaf 2. in the night 6 call, phone guy told the night guard that he’ll work in the day shift and phone guy will work in the night shift tomorrow. well at least that’s what i think
I can see how that would work except for one thing: the night 7 night guard gets fired, and from different clues it seems Phone Guy had a pretty important job. I can't see why PH would do something to get fired like tampering with the animatronics. Another thing is in fnaf 1 PH mentions how he's worked in that office, and if he was the night 7 night guard in fnaf 2 and was fired, it would be unlikely he'd be reemployed by the company with the reason he was fired for in the first place. Overall I think your theory is pretty good besides that plot hole
Regarding FNAF 3, I think there's further proof to this because phone dude mentioned that he looked like he could fit in with their horror-themed attraction. Since he would be a decaying corpse, that checks out.
Exactly! Plus, the SL cutscene implies that both guards are connected i.e. Michael.
thing is the fnaf 3 guard has lungs, the breathing when the vents go out proves it. Michael has 0 organs nor bones. Hudson is the fnaf 3 guard as stated by frights.
@@res6696 Fazbear Frights isn't canon to the game universe.
@@res6696 michael isn’t just a sack of skin, if he was he’d just be dangling like golden freddy all day
@@nightshademasquerade4703so FNAF 3 didn't happen?
I genuinely think the movie is going to have its own continuity from the games, which is kinda sad but interesting. Unless some of the scenes are over separate years.
Why would that be sad? It be super confusing with so many plotholes if it was connected to the games.
@@Patrick-nq9ij I don’t know I just have a personal attachment to the original story, before all the steel wool bs
You don’t have to think it is, it’s pretty much confirmed it is
@@Patrick-nq9ijLike how the books are both a part of the games, and also not.
It'd be really hard to make a movie based on the first game without changing it. The story is hidden in the background and the game keeps us entertained through its gameplay and the mystery that the audience has to figure out and that certainly wouldn't work for a 3-hour movie
Not only do Smith and Schmidt sound similar, they’re actually the same name. Schmidt is just the German counterpart of the English Smith, and they both mean the same thing.
When Scott was giving hints on his website about the lore (this was after FNaF 4 but before FNaF World and during a GTLive event) one of the hints to solve the story was simply
"Four games, one story". This to me says that the original 4 games are about 1 character, Micheal Afton. Why else would he think that quote would be helpful to solve the entire story (at that time).
... It Just means that the 4 games together create 1 story...
Michael Afton as a concept didn't exist yet.
@@syweb2 at the time Scott was writing The Silver Eyes and working on Sister Location. The concept wasn't revealed but it did exist for Scott.
that was just a hint to dream theory being canon back when it was canon
No the story is the afton family, not just michael.
One of my favorite theories is that you only play as Michael in the custom night of fnaf 2, because it implies that Jeremy Fitzgerald wasn't actually there for a greater purpose, but he was just some random night guard who was unusually determined to stay 5 nights plus an extra night for overtime, despite the fact that not only are there killer murder-bots out to get him, but there was an actual child murderer on the site like 5 hours before he needed to start his shift(which he wasn't supposed to have anyways, it's overtime hours). And to top it all off, he only gets like a hundred dollars per week. This is next level motivation, and fitzgerald has earned my respect
I actually remember hearing a theory that the reason Jeremy was so determined to stay there was because he was a private investigator investigating William who at the time was working a day shift security guard and by night 6 he either got killed by William or Michael convinced Jeremy to drop his investigation or just bite of 87
@@JohnShepherd117That’s actually not too bad of a theory, him being an investigator.
@@JohnShepherd117 He never died because Phone Guy says in fnaf 1 that ''it's amazing how the human body can survive without the frontal lobe'' or something like that, and he's talking about the bite of 87
@@Nitsua-RN true but my comment was more to explain why Jeremy decided to stay when he had no reason too
what makes alot of sense is that since the toy bots have a predator database, the reason they become activated at night and follow you is because youre Afton
To add on to FNaF 4, the entire game is pretty much a nightmarish reimagining of the first game.
Bonnie and Chica both attack from their usual sides, and Chica occasionally enters the kitchen, something she only previously did in FNaF 1.
Foxy's closet is a clear parallel to Pirate's Cove, but since there aren't any cameras in FNaF 4, the acts of checking what phase he's in and shutting the door on him have been rolled into one.
Freddy's a bit of an outlier, but I think fending the Freddles off is loosely based on power management. Let the Freddles pile up for too long and Freddy will kill you, just like if you get careless with power usage.
All this combined with the Phone Guy cameo you mentioned, I think it's clear that FNaF 4 being a twisted version of FNaF 1 isn't just true from a gameplay perspective, but from a story perspective as well. Mike's experiences working the night shift are causing him to have these nightmares, either during or shortly after FNaF 1.
As for the hospital equipment by the bed, it's probably Mike's memories of visiting his brother in the hospital. Working at Freddy's is likely digging up unwanted memories, which is also why Fredbear shows up and he appears in the dreams as a child. In his head, not only is he fighting off his fears of the animatronics, but the guilt of what he did as well.
There's also the room and its contents. It looks nothing like Crying Child's and it holds a toy phone, fan, purple robot, caterpillar toy, and the Foxy Plush in the closet still has his head.
@@Takejiro24 Yeah, in hindsight, that really should've given it away. Especially with the Fredbear plush being nowhere in the room despite literally following the crying child everywhere.
@@Meagz_ I nearly forgot about the Fredbear Plush. ☠️
yeah but fnaf 4 just being a dream deosn't work becouse first it was litarelly conformnt in sister location that the fnaf 4 bedromom and plushtrap's hallway are real locations litraelly implying that the events of fnaf 4 somewhat happened in real life and also secound if we play as michael then why are we in the height of a child becouse if you look at the fnaf 4 gameplay we can tell that we are at the height of a child which if fnaf 4 is after fnaf 1 then it woudn't make sense since by the time both fnaf 2 and fnaf 1 happen michael is already an adult so waht is with that?
yeah but fnaf 4 just being a dream deosn't work becouse first it was litarelly conformnt in sister location that the fnaf 4 bedroom and plushtrap's hallway are real locations litraelly implying that the events of fnaf 4 somewhat happened in real life and also secound if we play as michael then why are we in the height of a child becouse if you look at the fnaf 4 gameplay we can tell that we are at the height of a child which if fnaf 4 is after fnaf 1 then it woudn't make sense since by the time both fnaf 2 and fnaf 1 happen michael is already an adult so waht is with that?
One of Molten Freddy’s lines in pizza sun all but confirms its Micheal, as the “TOGETHER AGAIN!” Would perfectly reference how they were… yknow. Inside Micheal as robot spaghetti for a while.
Smith and Schmidt sound familiar because they're literally different regional versions of the same last name
Thinking of the gravestones in the hill, is Mike is purposefully using the names of his father’s victims as his aliases as the various restaurants? Fritz and Jeremy? Maybe the repeated names in the series aren’t just coincidental. This could be to honor their memory in an odd way, or to lure his father to him so he mistakes his son as a loose end to tie up.
Also! Another detail in UCN that suggests that it's William who we're playing as is that if you get to the red lake easter egg - the background sound is the reversed audio of his voice actor screaming the names of Henry and Mike. FNAF 4 confuses me, I think that's the game that got messed around the most bc of the fnaf narrative shift. Despite us not actually knowing too much about him, Michael is one of my favorite characters!
To add to Micheal being the protag of fnaf 3, In the book "Gumdrop Angel", we have a story called "What we found". This story is about a guy working the night shift at Fazbear's fright: The horror attraction". In this story, a new old animatronic is found and brought in: namely Springtrap. For the remainder of the book, the protagonist is getting hallucinations involving various fnaf characters (such as Chika, Bonnie, Foxy etc.) and it is made very clear that Springtrap is a stand in for the protagonist's step dad. The protagonist for example, remembers a time his abusive step-dad broke his arm, and then, Springtrap does so too. In the end, the protagonist admits to himself that he killed his step-dad by starting a fire at their family home.
Now, this is ofc not a 1 to 1 retelling of fnaf 3 (The protagonist goes by the name Hudson, and has no previous connections to Freddy's. His step father also isn't a murderer, just some abusive guy. He also doesn't have any siblings i think), none of the stories in the fazbear frights are, however, they often hold close parrallelles with the games or explain certain things that happen in the games. The fact that this is the most obvious nod to a specific game in any of these books makes it a strong contestant for being a "hey, look into this one, it might be explaining some things you're missing" kind of story. And with the main character having set a fire to get rid of his father-figure, as well as the father figure of the nightgaurd in FF:THA literally being the embodyment of Springtrap, wouldn't make it too unlikely that this is a nod at the idea of the fnaf 3 nightgaurd being "Springtrap's son". And as Springtrap ofc is William, this would only really have Michael as an option.
My best guess for fnaf 4 is both. You play as cc/evan for nights 1-5 and you play as Michael on night 6 since that night (like most night 6's) are canon. To me it makes more sense if cc was the one experiencing night 5, its a 1 on 1 between him and the animatronic he seems to fear the most. In night 6 you play as Michael, someone who wasn't afraid of any of the animatronics but probably got traumatized after seeing one kill his brother in an event that was entirely his fault.
That's what I had thought too when thinking about the story
Yeah but if it is cc’s bedroom then why is Michael in there? I’m personally leaning more towards Michael
Throughout the game.
@@Zelkz01 Maybe a dream in Michael's case? It's never been hard confirmed whether the nightmare animatronics were dreams or the result of audio illusion disc, but we do know that both Michael and cc have both at least seen nightmare fredbear. So it could go either way. Thats just my best guess tho
also forgot to mention. The bedroom in fnaf 4 looks nothing like ccs bedroom in the mini-games. So that's more reason to believe something else is going on
This was just reconfirmed by the Dittophobia story in the new book. We play as Micheal in every night of FNAF 4
So apparently on Universals website it actually states that Mike is “haunted by the unsolved disappearance of his younger brother more than a decade before”
Now this could just be misleading us from what actually happens, much like how the same synopsis states that Matthew Lillard plays “Steve Raglan, Mike’s smug career counselor”, but if Mike and micheal do end up being separate, it’s still safe to assume there’s going to be a lot of parallels between both characters
Sister Location also heavily hints at Michael being the night guard in FNaF 3, if he's not the night guard in FNaF 3 that secret ending is practically pointless
The secret ending was meant as a teaser to the next game, to show that Springtrap survived the fire
@@burner555 we already knew he survived the fire because of the “it burns” newspaper clipping showing him in the background of that clipping after beating the game, we didn't need sister location to tell us William was still alive
if you are playing has Michael in FNAF 3 the jump scare makes sense William would just step closer because he would Recognize the player
'' HA GOT YOU NOW,YOU....wait you look familiar...... do i know you?....wait a minute...MICHAEL?''
fnaf 2 wouldnt be micheal as right before fnaf 2 is when afton started his reverse aliving spree, as described by the phone guy saying someone used a yellow suit in the back and none of the animatronics are actigin right. the spree and hauntings
That was his second wave of doing it. The first was in 1985. You play as michael after the bite of 87 so like night 5 or 6 i dont remember
i saw a theory that william put both his kids though the nightmare experiments, doing it to michael to punish him for defending his sibling, leading him to be a jerk to his sibling in the mini games in 4. also saw a video about one of the books, with the character being a michael stand in, where he wakes up in sister location and last recalled being in the nightmare experiments and thinking he was much younger or maybe even though he was the sibling.
The fnaf 4 situation is... very complicated. Do I think that, at least in some capacity, Michael is the protagonist of fnaf 4? Yes. The fnaf survival logbook all but confirms this. However, when you start getting into *why* Michael is fnaf 4's protagonist, things go out of control very quickly. I've seen a few theories floating around, and I'll try addressing them (in addition to providing my own take on the matter).
It really does seem like fnaf 4 takes place during / after fnaf 1 because of the confusing layout of the house and the phone guy easter egg. Many have speculated that Michael is having nightmares between his shifts, which is a fair assumption. The logbook does talk about *recent* dreams after all. People have suggested that maybe Evan (CC)'s spirit is reaching out to Mike through his dreams. Again, I find that to be a nice narrative. The flashes of an IV, pills, and flowers certainly support this idea. There's just one tiny detail that calls the whole thing into question, needlessly complicating things as per usual with this series. If we assume that fnaf 4 is Michael's dream, or a shared dream with his brother, then the Nightmare animatronics' death lines from UCN make absolutely no sense.
In UCN we play as William, obviously. In that game, there are some specific voice lines I'd like to call attention to. Nightmare Freddy says "I am given flesh to be your tormentor." Yeah, okay, fine. If he were a dream, he wouldn't be real, so he now "has flesh" whereas he didn't before. That's well and dandy, except for the fact that Nightmare Fredbear says to William "I assure you, I am very real," and "This time, there is more than an illusion to fear." Dream, illusion, it's all just lofty language that could be seen as interchangeable if you really squint at it. But, you have to keep in mind who these lines are directed toward.
William is the one who created... I don't want to say it, but he made illusion discs. I know, it's a very controversial topic in this community. Anyway, the fact that Fredbear brings up illusions specifically seems like an oddly deliberate detail. Also, why the hell does Fredbear even say these things to William? He shouldn't really need to. That is, unless William has seen the nightmare animatronics before, and he *knows* that they aren't supposed to be real; merely illusions. Otherwise, why would William even need convincing that the nightmares in UCN are real?
So, I present to you now three different possibilities (all of which involve William being responsible for the creation of the nightmare animatronics):
1) William gives Evan nightmares in 1983, and Evan transfers his experiences to Michael during / after fnaf 1
2) William gives Michael nightmares sometime between 1983 and fnaf 1 which he then re-experiences during / after fnaf 1
3) William gives both Evan *and* Michael the same nightmares in 1983, which Michael is now re-experiencing during / after fnaf 1
These all seem... somewhat plausible to me, but I'd like to go into detail about my reasoning for each. For the first possibility, the idea is that William, in his effort to keep his son away from the restaurants, makes him scared of animatronics using illusions. It's cut and dry, and it's supported by the easter eggs in fnaf sl that link it to fnaf 4. As for the second, the idea is also kinda straightforward. William needs to test out his illusion discs or something, perhaps he wants to take out his anger and grief for Evan on the one who got him killed, or maybe he's just torturing Michael cause he feels like it; we all know he'd do that. This prompts him to give Michael nightmares using the discs.
Now, it's the third possibility that I find more interesting. This is the idea that I personally support. Why? Well, first I should probably explain why I even consider this to be a possibility, because on paper it seems to make no sense. My hypothesis is that the illusion discs aren't an exact science. What I mean by that is, while William may have intended to only give nightmares to Evan, the disc affects anyone who's in close proximity to it. That includes Michael. While that explains how this could be possible, it doesn't explain why I like this idea so much. The reason I like it has to do with character motivation. If these two are both experiencing nightmares in 1983, it not only explains why Evan is so scared of the restaurants, but it also explains why Michael is such a jerk. They're both afraid; they just express it in different ways.
BUT HEY, THAT'S JUST A THEORY-
Michael is not the protagonist in the fourth game. The character encyclopedia confirms it
@@jhtoxic7870
Okay. If that is the case, I’m curious as to why he doodled nightmare fredbear in the survival logbook. And, I’m also wondering what exactly the character encyclopedia states that suggests he isn’t the protagonist, because I personally don’t own a copy.
@@452pokemaster well, we don’t have a concrete answer as to how Michael knew about Nightmare Fredbear it’s possible, he may have had visions of him brought upon by Golden Freddy, he has the ability to cause hallucinations and it’s theorized that he’s possessed by the crying child.
@@jhtoxic7870
I mean, even if we consider that to be the case, it doesn’t explain all the Fnaf 1 Easter eggs in Fnaf 4. Scott said himself in a post that he didn’t include any random Easter eggs in that game. Between the grandfather clock chimes in Fnaf 1, the suspiciously similar layout of the bed room and the Fnaf 1 office, and the phone guy calls from Fnaf 1, it seems like the Fnaf 1 and Fnaf 4 protagonists are actually the same person.
If not Micheal, then who is the protagonist of the 4th game? Evan? If that’s what you think, then hear me out on this. What if Evan and Micheal are *both* the protagonists of the 4th game? And by that, I don’t mean something stupid like Evan being the mini games’ protagonist and Micheal being the main game’s protagonist. I mean that the nightmare animatronics are their shared experience, which was created by William.
Wouldn’t you know it, I already suggested that in the comment you’ve been replying to. Maybe you want to reread it so I don’t have to explain it again?
@@jhtoxic7870 Don't take The Character Encyclopedia seriously, it's a cash grab written by a bunch of different ghost writers who knew next to nothing about the series
I love how your able to kind argue for UCN and FNAF4 that its Michael, but FNAF World is just straight up played as freddy.
I really love how this is edited! , you are deff gonna blow up sometime if you keep up these actually entertaining videos
Thank you! This means a lot!
@@lotodotshi
I agree
Just another detail I noticed, Mike **Schmitz** sounds like a low effort fake last name you'd think of on the spot. It's hilarious how cartoon it actually sounds. Like two kids in a trench coat going up to a cashier asking for alcohol, then when asked for their name they say something like "uhhh... Fritz... *Schmitz*-"
Schmidt is actually the German form of Smith, so they are the same name, but in different languages.
Fantastic first video, editing and information is great and well assembled in a approachable manner. Once the views come in you will definitely hit the big time. Very good vid 😊😊😊
It has been my personal belief for awhile now that we play as Mike during the nights and CC during the mini games. While it is easy to say it could be both during the nights-Scott isn't a stranger to complicated intricacies like that-I don't think so. Not only is it so needlessly complicated for no reason, but there is no actual evidence to suggest that we play as CC. Be it the Logbook, the room being different or the phone call, all signs point to it being Mike. As for the flower, pills and IV easter eggs, those are likely a guilty reminder to Mike as to what he did to his brother.
Hell, if you're a believer in the two spirits in Golden Freddy theory, then the appearance of Nightmare and Fredbear could be a spin on two spirits (CC and Cassidy) haunting Mike in his dreams for what he did. This could be to parallel William's later living nightmare as seen in The Man in Room 1280. Specifically, Cassidy would be Fredbear because she seems to be the one in control of the Golden Freddy suit whilst CC would be Nightmare, made obvious by the human brain calling back to the injury that caused his untimely death. To be clear, I don't think this would literally be CC and Cassidy, but yet another aspect of Mike's nightmare influenced by what he's seen at the different Freddy's locations.
Well the hospital equipment wouldn’t be there if we were playing as Foxy bro
Also there is absolutely no evidence we play as Foxybro during the night in Fnaf 4
@@Handlelesswithme The whole thing would be induced by guilt, so yes, the hospital stuff bring there does make sense.
@@yukinyx3983 okay maybe it was guilt. How about the player character being the size of a toddler compared to the bed and doors or the bedroom obviously being a child’s bedroom with purple phones and stuff
Is that guilt too? Cause if the 1983 fredbite happened when Foxybro was about a teenager shouldn’t he at least seem like a teenager
Wasn't expecting to find another person who also has (somewhat) of the same theories as to which games Michael was the protagonist of, but here we are! Amazing video by the way ^^
Another thing to note about FNAF 4 is that the Crying Child's room in the minigames doesn't match up with his room in each night. C.C.'s room is completely empty, save for the plushies, a bed, and nightstand. The room also only has one door and does not connect to any other hallway, with the room also lacking a closet. This could be Michael's room, since we don't know what it looks like, but the problem is the Afton household has a completly different architecture in Midnight Motorist, so who knows anymore.
My theory regarding the FNAF 3 protag is that yes, it *is* Henry, the Phantoms somewhat torn state can be a metaphorical way to show how Henry feels about the animatronics; prisons of his own making, with the torn up states representing the damage he thought he'd done.
And also, I don't think he intentionally caused Fazbear Frights to burn down, I think it actually *was* due to faulty wiring, upon seeing the damage done to William after this incident went down, that's what gave Henry the idea that fire is the weakness, and setting up the plan to burn all the monsters haunting the Fazbear Brand to ashes in FNAF 6.
Don't think so, but it makes sense
This was really awesome! personally I still think Mike is alive, my idea is that as father and son Michael has to forcibly live forever until every bit of William, along with the rest of the agony is completely gone. Even though it's pretty much confirmed William is dead, we still have The Mimic that needs to be stopped. We may not see him currently, but I have a feeling our zombie hero is still alive and kicking doing stuff in the background.
Nah, It's hinted that Michael WANTED to die at the end of fnaf 6 judging by what Henry said in the connection termination speech. "There was a way planned out for you, but I don't think you would want that." Also his remnant probably burned in the fire (Because literally everyone else died).
@@ChrisTheCrap No no I'm saying Michael literally is forced to live, he does want to die but because of his remnant and agony it's keeping him alive. He's stuck in a state of reanimated torment until he gets rid of every bit of evil. I get what you mean with everyone dying in FNaF 6 so it's possible he might as well have passed on, but still it's just a fun idea to think about lol.
@@ChrisTheCrap Which is still a storytelling failure in my book. Micheal had no indication that opening the restaurant would set up a conclusion to his quest and depending on player input, he may not even follow up on the animatronics showing up. To me, it looks like he just wanted to do something with his future days and happened to stumble into Henry's trap by pure chance.
I am completely sure you play as Michael in all, with the exception of recent installments and fnaf world you play as Cassidy. Of course Michael is only the night guard for the last night of fnaf 2 but aside from that. I genuinely believe you play as Michael in all games.
To be honest, im pretty sure that the FNAF 4 location is a distorted child's bedroom, with slight hints of the FNAF 1 location, using the illusion disks to make everything look worse. The pills and such probably serve as reminders of what Michael caused.
FNAF 4 specifically states that you play as a child during these events.
@@fuckthisstupidasshandleshit no it doesn't. the minigames depict a child, but nowhere in the nights does it confirm that you play as one.
Now to you, my friend, let me tell you why I think he's Michael.
Firstly, the bedroom, and the house in general, are structured in a very abnormal way. 2 doors leading into separate hallways. This is reminiscent of the FNAF 1 location, showing 2 doors leading into separate hallways.
Now what does this mean? Well, it's basically confirmed that Michael worked at the FNAF 1 location under a fake name. The paycheck lists him as "Mike Schmidt". This is also supported by the distorted phone call that can sometimes be heard. The logbook states that Michael has at least seen Nightmare Fredbear before, implying that he has been in a similar situation at the very least.
As for the minigames, we all know that Michael put the child into Fredbear's mouth. Interestingly, they usually involve Michael doing something to him, like scaring him or locking him in a closet.
I think these are traumatic memories of what happened on that day, coming back to haunt Michael.
FNAF 4 happens after FNAF 1 and Michael is the protagonist.
@@enderslayer0848 "In this last chapter of the Five Nights at Freddy's original story, you must once again defend yourself against Freddy Fazbear, Chica, Bonnie, Foxy, and even worse things that lurk in the shadows. **Playing as a child whose role is yet unknown, you must safeguard yourself until 6am by watching the doors, as well as warding off unwanted creatures that may venture into your closet or onto the bed behind you.**" - FNAF 4 Steam Description.
You are wrong.
So what?
That's not confirmation.
Note that it's distorted. You'd never hear it in regular gameplay, even if you listened.
Because Michael sees Nightmare Fredbear, he does the nights? Does that mean the game devs of FNAF AR did every single night?
And your evidence?
Wrong. FNAF 4's protagonist is the Crying Child, who died in 1983. FNAF 1 takes place in 2003.
@@fuckthisstupidasshandleshit first of all the steam descriptions are dubious at best, calling Freddy Fazbear "Freddybear" and such.
Secondly, a Steam description is pretty shoddy evidence that you play as the crying child.
For example, Dream Theory was likely the original ending. if we're going based on that, then yes, the crying child would be the protagonist, hence the description reflecting that. However, that was retconned, being very much non-canon, and now the protagonist is left ambiguous and the description being worthless.
Thirdly, the phone call can happen randomly in your night. Sure, it's reversed, but why would it be there otherwise? FNAF doesn't do coincidences. They could have played a simple stock garbling sound, but they didn't.
Michael has seen Nightmare Fredbear, and there's a good chance he saw the other nightmares as well. Especially considering that he is asked if he had nightmares before the image.
Also, FNAF AR's characters are as non-canon as it gets. Using that as a source is pretty stupid, to be honest.
Lastly, FNAF 1 takes place in 1993, evidenced by the paycheck. The "20 years" line is either an exaggeration, or Scott not thinking too far ahead. The animatronics are also very much inspired by animatronic mascots from the 90s. 2003 is not the year that FNAF 1 takes place in.
Get your game theory ass outta here and come back with a solid theory.
@@fuckthisstupidasshandleshit also it says fnaf 4 is the last chapter when it isnt lol
9:01 id like to think that Glam Freddy is Michael or has his spirit in a way as he tells us that hes been at the FNaF6 pizzeria before and hes helping a kid who looks vaguely like his brother and wants to make amends in a way
6:23 “fnaf world? no, we play as freddy. see? that’s freddy ☺️.”
Considering that FNaF history started in 1983 (FNaF 4) and ended in FNaF 6 (approx. 2026-2028) and that Michael was about 15 years old in FNaF 4, he concluded his history in the franchise between 58 and 60 years (more approx. 59 years old)
The guy at least lived a long time, since he reached the elderly stage. If he didn't die in FNaF 6 as some theorize, by now he must be enjoying his retirement.
He probably didn't live a good life from what we can tell though, he lived with a serial killer father, he accidentally killed his younger brother, which might or might have not caused Afton to commit child murders, he got scooped by her dead little sister who was possessing an animatronic and then said sister and her friends live inside your skin, causing Michael to be a walking dead corpse, he feels guilty for what his father did again he thinks its his fault because of the bite of 83. He lived with that guilt for 40+ years, can't really blame him for wanting to be burned along with what is little left of his original family, Elizabeth and William (although they insane now) release the agony of those who died due to Afton's mental instability, these is why i think his 100% dead, who can live a normal life after all that happened? The only reason Michael probably continued living and didn't k*** himself was because of the guilt of what happened to his brother and trying to redeem himself, and end his fathers deadly legacy.
Apparently some things have been confirmed lately because of the new books:
-fnaf 4 nightmares aren’t attached to illusion disks anymore, but to some kind of gas that makes you see and believe things ( it has also been confirmed to be Micheal who experiences those).
-the events of fnaf 1 happen before sl, so now the motive of our firing as Michael afton (odor) isn’t because of body decay
Prove that they've been confirmed by the books that have male pregnancies in them.
@@animeman6599 Here's the thing, they are and aren't. Some STORIES are outright said to be canon, some are said to be connected as in they give hints at what happened, and others are outright stated to not be true.
I think in FNAF 4 1-5 we play as C.C but Night 6-8 we play as Michael.
Those nightmares began after Mike accidentally killed his brother.
The hospital references is The GUILT he feels
And he experience this nightmares even when he is adult and this incredibly describes how much Michael misses his brother and how much guilt he feels.
Even if he completes night 8, it is still not over.
Those nightmares affected him so much that in FNAF 3 it transformed into hallucinations.
What if micheal is controlling freddy by playing the video game called "fnaf world"
And i sound like matpat trying to explain the fnaf lore
Yeah, you sound like that
THIS WAS SO MUCH FUN AHHHHHH!!! I really enjoyed this, and there a lot of times I was like "yeah this makes sense actually!" and the one off with freddy being like "no, that's...yeah...freddy" LMAO. I never thought of that Frtiz Smith theory before, but it MAKES sense, unless they just got lazy and forgot to change the slip.
So glad you enjoyed it!
@@lotodots You're gonna blow up (and no this is not a threat)
I say this on every third FNAF video, but my sister and I had a theory we play as the big brother in FNAF4’s bonus nights while the Crying Child’s dead/dying since it came out. It of course hit even harder once we started learning who these characters really were.
For the fnaf two on the night 7, I think it’s phone guy, considering how he said he’d take over the Night Shift the next day. Also, we didn’t get a phone call from him. The odor? Well, after night 6, Jeremy has the day shift, and that’s when the bite of ‘87 happened. Phone guy must’ve taken the body somewhere, making him have a bad odor.
Okay sorry if this upsets who ever reads this for bring this up but fnaf 4 is Michael experiencing the memories of children William kidnapped using circus babies and who under went the fear gas experiment explaining why the background keeps changing. Now the part that’s confusing is how could Michael experience someone else’s memories? Well that answer is that the scooper can receive and distribute remnant and after Michael had is guts ripped out he had those memories injected into him when the scooper stabbed him. Also the fnaf 4 house is on the security map.
Just want to point something out, odor doesn't really mean much, as Scott confirmed it's a joke, phone guy said it's from the aminitronics, and sister location is confirmed to happen after follow me (which is after fnaf 1) and 10 years after the bite of 83, also Mike is still helping William until fnaf ar.
(Plus that midnight motorist joke is inaccurate now, since we have a confirmed conclusion for midnight motorist, since it's confirmed that it's Williams vicitm)
Fnaf AR, what?
@@burner555 mike is trying to help the mimic (who everyone thought was willaim)
One thing you're not considering is that micheal was like 10 or 12 in 1983 before killing his brother, so if he would work in fnaf 2 pizzeria he would be like 14-18 years old, in fnaf 1 he would be 20-25, fnaf 1 could maybe be played as micheal but for me fnaf 2 is definitely not
Not confirmed.Michaels sprite in Fnaf 4 looks bulky.His character at that time seems to be intended as a teenager,like 14-16?Definitely not 10 though.
It the beginning of sister location it says Welcome Mr afton
I’m so happy this popped up in my recommended, criminally underrated
For FNAF2 : I like to believe Jeremy is temporary guard who just had a bad week with haunted animatronics 😅😅 .. kind of like side characters in anime while one person is doing this , the other character is doing something else….. basically while Mike is at Fnaf 1 location messing with the animatronics Jeremy is having a bad week. Faz corp doesn’t care 🤷🏾♂️ Mike gets wind of this and goes to FNAF2 location on night 7 with a different Alias because he was just fired 😂😂
Nah
FNAF 2 is in 1987
FNAF 1 clearly takes place sometime AFTER 1987
they could not be taking place at the same time
Technically ultimate custom night is supposed to be Williams own personal part of the underworld
I think michael afton is in fnaf 1 to fnaf 6
Not nights 1-5 of fnaf 2
@@D3ZB0T oh yea
He’s not in FNAF 4 either
@@thefnafdetective oh☹️
@@thefnafdetective yes he is. We’ve known since the security logbook and it pretty much has been confirmed with dittophobia
For a first video this is very well made, enjoyed it greatly
Nice video man, congratulations. But I would like to put my view about this topic:
𝙁𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙉𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩𝙨 𝙖𝙩 𝙁𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙙𝙮'𝙨 : Yes, Mike = Michael and it has references to Sister Location in the Survival Log Book just like you showed. Btw the dismissal for odor I find it hard to be because of Michael, I suppose it's the animatronics themselves because in the game's newspapers it is said that they stink (because of the rotten bodies inside them).
𝙁𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙉𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩𝙨 𝙖𝙩 𝙁𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙙𝙮'𝙨 𝟮 :No, because Michael didn't know about the possessed animatronics until FNaF 1 (in the Survival Log Book it is said that he started working there just because of the money and free Pizza), and FNaF 2 takes place before 1.
𝙁𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙉𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩𝙨 𝙖𝙩 𝙁𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙙𝙮'𝙨 𝟯 : No, in Pizzeria Simulator the Scraptrap says: "You may not recognize me at first, but I assure you, it's still me", so Michael cannot have witnessed FNaF 3. And btw, Phone Dude says on the first night: "Like, the attraction opens in like, a week, so we have to make sure everything works, and nothing catches on fire! [...] Some of this equipment is barely functional Yeah, I-I wasn't joking about the fire that's-that's-that's a real risk.", thus giving a foreshadow of the endgame.
𝙁𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙉𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩𝙨 𝙖𝙩 𝙁𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙙𝙮'𝙨 𝟰 : kinda yeah, the FNaF Encyclopedia says that the nights are C.C's nightmares after the bite, but apparently during the events of FNaF 1 C.C's soul tries to communicate via nightmares (?), or the Michael coincidentally had nightmares similar to C.C.
𝙁𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙉𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩𝙨 𝙖𝙩 𝙁𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙙𝙮'𝙨 : 𝙎𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙇𝙤𝙘𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 : "Father...It's me Michael..."
𝙁𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙉𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩𝙨 𝙖𝙩 𝙁𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙙𝙮'𝙨 : 𝙋𝙞𝙯𝙯𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙖 𝙎𝙞𝙢𝙪𝙡𝙖𝙩𝙤𝙧: Yes, and you already explained why.
U play as mike in 1,2,3,4,sl and 6
@@danaconstantin5142 no, Just FNAF 1,5 and 6.
What About In The Logbook Foxy Is In The FNaF 3 Office And Foxy is Mike's Favourite
@@Beellkax 1. Part of Fazbear Frights was based on the Log Book, it's something that existed way before FNaF 3. It doesn't mean that Michael participated in FNaF 3.
2. Phone Guy also likes Foxy, does that mean he was in FNAF 3?
Please read the FNAF 3 part from my original comment
Imo Scraptrap's line means that Mike may not recognise William because his Scraptrap/Afton suit is different from the Springtrap/Springbonnie suit, which in my interpretation confirms Mike working at FNAF 3
Mike schmidt - fnaf
Jeremy fitzgerald - fnaf 2
Fritz smith - fnaf 2
Hudson foster - fnaf 3
Young michael afton - fnaf 4
Michael afton - fnaf sister location
Angsty Teen - fnaf sister location
Eggs benedict - fnaf sister location
Stanley - fnaf (Room for one more)
Michael afton - fnaf pizzeria simulator
And
Gregory and cassie - fnaf security breach
Michael Afton is fnaf 4
@@cephlo4933 how do you know
@@william5356 Because there is mountains of irrefutable evidence which confirm it's Michael and not CC.
@@cephlo4933 so it's not evan afton anymore 😕
Just michael afton in fnaf 4 correct ✅️
@@william5356 If Scott hadn't made Sister Location and any of the games (and the logbook) afterwards, then yeah it would've been Evan but then it got changed to Michael.
I pretty much agree with everything said in this video however I do kinda wish you delved more into some of theories of who we could've been playing as in each game
3:07 Smith and Schmidt are the same. Schmidt is just the german word for Smith
Ok
what I find kind of funny about the thumbnail is that FNaF 1-4 and pizzeria simulator has their normal game icons/photos and then there's Sister location
absolutely love this video! something i always wonder about fnaf games, please make more content its fantastic 🥳
6:23 no? You clearly play as Mario, you can literally see him right there
my au: fnaf 4: crying child fnaf 2: Jeremy Fitzgerald fnaf 1: michael fnaf sister location: michael fnaf 3: michael fnaf pizzeria simulator: michael
How do you only have 1k subscribers!!! This video is amazing
5:10 I get it! Like, legit, I just solved it. The nightmares have been stated in UCN to be illusions, which, in this franchise, means illusion disks (yeah, those things). That means it’s entirely possible for Micheal Afton to have seen the Nightmare animatronics
kinda funny how i got an ad for the fnaf movie on this...
This video was great! Can’t wait to see more videos uploaded onto this channel
6. hes in 6 games:fnaf 1,fnaf 2,fnaf 3,fnaf 4,fnaf sl,fnaf pizzeria sim.
In my opinion
FNaF 1
FNaF 2 (nights 6-7 and the rest as Jeremy)
FNaF 3
FNaF 4 (The Fredbear/Nightmare nights and the Rest as CC)
FNaF SL
FNaF 6
All of them until any game after FNAF 6.
UCN=William HP=Vanny SB=Gregory and Cassie
As i heared the pink slip in fnad 1 and 2 at the end of custom night says tempering with the animatronics bacause at custom night youre the one whos changeing their AI from 1 to 20 so at custom nights jeremy and mike probably just did something to the animatronics unprofessionally to be able to change how agressive they are
Now if we sit crooked and speak correctly:
1- FNAF 3 If the night watchman sees animatronics from FNAF 1 and 2 as hallucinations. He must have worked in both places and must try to prevent the animatronics from harming him. This brings us directly to the FNAF 1-2-3 Night watchman as Micheal Afton. Because after the Michael SL incident, there is a walking corpse, since 1993-2023 is a long time, a normal person must either die or age, but Michael lives forever because of the residue.
2- We can play Nightmare BB Minigame in FNAF 4, which means that the person who survived the night is working in FNAF 2.
3- The behavior of the animatronics in FNAF 4 is very similar to game 1 and 2. As in FNAF 1, Bonnie comes from the left and Chica comes from the right. Chica's sound in FNAF 4 kitchen as in FNAF 1, Foxy's own private space like in FNAF 1 and disappearing like in FNAF 2. Freddy jumpscares at us from behind like in FNAF 1
fnaf 4 halloween animatronics arent canon
@@iamrightoutsideyourwindowhello Nightmare BB appears in both FNAF 4 versions.
something you forgot to mention is that michael in sister location explicitly tells his father he is going to go find him
so yeah, he might be the FNAF 3 security guard
FNaF 1 - Def Michael, says his name and all
FNaF 2 - Likely Michael on at least custom night but not for certain. The repeated use of the word ‘odour’ makes me believe it’s Mike.
FNaF 3 - No proof but very likely. The fact they were working at the attraction after being a real FNaF night guard (hallucinates animatronics) and tried burning the place down tells me it’s Mike looking, finding and attempting to end his father.
FNaF 4 is likely Mike again but could be about the crying child (CC). The guidebook hints at it being Mike in a nightmare. Phone guy in FNaF 1 says that “it’s amazing how someone can live without the frontal lobe” when talking about the ‘bite of 87’ so it’s very possible CC was hospitalised before dying, hence the hospital items that Mike sees. It makes sense that he’d feel guilty for hospitalising and killing his brother. Fredbear; CC’s murdered also appears in the game which says a lot.
FNaF World: Yeah no
Sister location: We know this is Mike due to the spring-trap cutscene at the end of the game.
Pizzaria sim: Henry’s speech at the end of the game talks about the guard not wishing to leave and survive. This is Michael staying to make sure his father burns.
UCN - It could be him but it’s very unlikely and a lot of the death voice lines wouldn’t make sense in this case.
Help wanted and security breach - I don’t know enough about the lore post Pizzeria sim but Henry and Mike died so I doubt it’s him
I quite like the Michael is Glamrock freddy theory- because its almost as if he wanted to right his wrongs with his brother, or at least help another child through a scary thing that happened to them, almost like he saw Gregory as his own little brother during the events of security breach
Its 100% confirmed we play as michael in fnaf 3 as william and scrap baby, recognise him, elizabeth has only seen michael during sister location and William obviously saw him during fnaf 3, if baby is able to recognise him and scrap trap can as well, then michael is 100% the player of fnaf 3 no doubt abt it
The thing that makes Mike being Fritz Smith unlikely is that
1. Fritz taking up the night shift correlates up when phone guy says “I’ll probably take the night shift myself”
2. Phone guy died to the FNAF 1 animatronics so he can’t be Mike because he died from getting scooped; plus Mike and phone guy’s recordings coexist in FNAF 1 so I doubt Mike would be listening to prerecorded messages of himself eventually listening to his own death that didn’t even happen.
It seems more likely to me that Sister Location and FNAF 2 occur at around the same time and Elizabeth Afton getting scooped is the “bite” victim instead-freeing up Jeremy Fitzgerald to be Mike instead. Of course this theory has the weird flaw of if Baby is the bitter why are the Toy Animatronics canned, but that can be maneuvered around by William making Fazbear Entertainment use only the core 4 to avoid future accidents from the more advanced toy and Funtime animatronics while also covering his tracks so no one learns of his involvement.
It’s also entirely possible that due to the series retcons that FNAF 2 no longer matters to the lore outside of giving Phone Guy a backstory.
Short answer, every game through FNAF 6 (except for nights 1-5 of FNAF 2)
Fnaf 3's location is drawn in the logbook, and Fazbear's Frights "What we found" is about a nightguard named Hudson who works at Fazbears Frights and is imagining that Springtrap is his father, since that one isnt in Stotchline, that is just a parallel universe story so we can probably take mike as fnaf 3 guard since we know who Springtrap is and who his son is
Smith and Schmidt are literally the same name. One in english and the other in old german. (today the job is called Schmied)
There was a theory back in the day that I don't agree with but there is evidence for it. The theory is that we do play as Michael in UCN, the proof being is that William didn't interact with all of the animatronics in ucn, Micheal for the most part did (except for old man consequences), the line "the one you should not have killed" could be the crying child, and the crying child made this personal purgatory for Michael for his sin of killing his young brother.
Now what I believe is that it is a personal hell for William Afton and it was made by the spirit haunting Golden Freddy, this spirit is more selfish and that's where the line the one you shouldn't have killed comes into play.
This was a really good video keep it up!
in ucn you are playing as a mike and here is why:
1. you see mike's nightmares
2. animatronics tell you the one you schouldn't have killed(it's evan if it's text to wiliam then that don't make any sens becouse wiliam schouldn't kill any of this kids)
3. susie(chica)talk with evan before mike kill him(susie is kid with toys in fnaf 4 compare her with susie in fruity maze)
4. you can escape ucn mike kill only his brother by a mistake evan is taking revenge on him(wiliam won't be able to escape he kill 16 kids and he know what he is doing if you can escape ucn then that isn't hell and there isn't william
5. baby in ucn after killing us say wanna see a scooping room(mike was only scooped person)
6. nightmares talk to us like we meet them before
7. Most of scrapbaby voicelines is to mike(some are about paragraf 4)
And golden freddy is evan
1. Cassidy is one of 16 killed by wiliam kids he don't have reason to be special
2. William in logbook is asking golden freddy if he still have nightmares(evan was tortured by william in room from fnaf 4. William was creating hallutinations to kids in this room by gas)
3.it's me(golden freddy always say it to mike he is trying to tell mike that he is still there)
4. Golden freddy show himself
I'm not trying to say that william is free he also have his ucn without nightmares springtrap scraptrap and without escape but that ucn we are playing is mike pure.scott left himself way to bring old characters back to life if scott make william alive in later games then all other characters will be alive becouse of agony.
I went to check your channel for more videos like this and was really surprised when i found out this is your first one (not including shorts) Really good video and great editing!
Really keep up the nice work! I really enjoyed and i kinda never thought about in how many fnaf games you play as Micheal Afton lol
yeah in the encyclopedia it didn't mention the missing kids either well it need to cause the missing kids are important cause they missing dead & possessing 5 different animatronics & is literally part of the lore
I’ve always thought you’ve played fnaf 3 as Henry.
fnaf world (and other non-troll games that scott claims aren't canon) i like to believe are dreams or coma experiences inside of one of the characters heads after being unconscious, not only does this reflect the concept of The Desolate Hope (you traverse these dream like simulations happening within the minds of various robots, filled with wacky little enemies, several of which appearing in freddy in space 1) but fnaf world's map is shaped like a brain and has fredbear as a constant companion (the fnaf 4 crying atari bite little brother kid), but ucn is also canonically william's hell, not only does UCN have direct code connections to Fnaf world such as the OMC trophy, but UCN is really similar to SLCN which i believe is michael after being scooped and worn (you wont die, but youll wish you did) as a bunch of assorted funtimes are there instead of the usual ennard, also a notable lack of circus baby which during the development of SL was originally not going to be a part of ennard at all, hinted by the lack of her suit in the scooping room and how she can be seen with an intact endo while ennard is fully intact behind her, with scott retconning this because it went over everyone's heads so he ended up making the argument thing in the teaser source code to make it look like baby was ejected.
My thoery about the fnaf 4 one
Is that we play as michael in the mode where we only face nightmare and nightmare fredbear, because of his guilt
Michael afton ? Five night freddy
Amazing video!!! I fully believe we play as Mike through FNAF 1-6
Everybody gangsta with Mike in the first movie until Sister Location Movie's end comes out
Fnaf 4 is literally a mix of Michael's experiences:
It has 2 doors as fnaf 1 and you light them as fnaf 2 vents
In middle there's a closet resembling hallway since foxy is there and he seem to avoid light too.
And plushtrap must be either springbonnie plushie or just a memory of springtrap.
Also there are nightmare ballon boy, marionette and mangle wich are from fnaf 2. And we know Michael plays in fnaf 4 due to the fnaf 1 call that plays. So Michael is possibly the guard in fnaf 2 too.
Also don't forget nightmare fredbear. His mouth resembles bite of 83 and his stomach resembles Elizabeth's death
I think Scott decided at the end of the series that he wanted afton to be the main villian and the main hero be his son, micheal, its a cool concept son vs father, so I think Scott made later games to imoly we always played as Mike until fnaf 6
6:24
I was prepared for a somewhat in depth explanation of FNaF World, but nope.
He seemed very proud of himself to say we play as Freddy though.
8:00 actually some of the special voicelines imply that you play as multiple people.
Most are as William though since it's his hell.
But for certain exclusive 20 level options, the deaths sound less evil.
Like for Old Man Consequences, the main character drowns himself leaving "him" to his fate.
For that one, we most likely play as Henry. Since from his assumption, he avenged his daughter's death and had no reason to stay around anymore.
After watching the movie, you mention the pill bottles in FNAF 4, and well, Mike has pill bottles in the movie and it is seen very often. Perhaps it is something to look into?
I think we are playing as mike in ucn bc puppet says "I don't hate you but you should stay out of my way" and "The others are like animals but i am very aware" plus at the easter egg of the old man consequences it says "Leave the demons to his demons. Rest ur own soul. There is nothing else."
No it’s confirmed William
8:05 UCNis not his hell it' s his purgatory
The hospital equipment could be mike remembering that at the side of his brothers hospital bed
Fnaf 1: Definitely Michael with a fake surname.
Fnaf 2: I don’t know actually.
Fnaf 3: Makes sense for Mike wanting to kill William by setting the building on fire. But how he knew that the establishment found William is beyond me since Michael shouldn’t even know his location.
Sister Location: We already know the answer to this.
Pizzeria Simulator: Definitely
Mike could have probably been visiting every location related to Freddy's in some way hoping to see his father in one of them, or just was invested in the fact that they were revisiting old locations, hoping they would find him somewhere (Which they did)
@@mrult28this makes the most sense considering that in fnaf 1 William isn’t there and fnaf 2 he’s already gone by the time Michael gets there.
Mike could be Fritz Smith in Fnaf 2 tho,
Fritz gets fired for the same reason Mike does in fnaf 1
People always talking about how Micheal could be glamrock freddy, but what if Henry possesses Freddy instead? After all he did say that he was remaining close to the inferno
I personally think that the FNAF 3 protagonist is some random nightguard, solely because it would be 2023 and no one would hire a corpse. Michael only got the FFPS job because Henry wouldn't care, probably.
Truthfully I like this theory .
Why would Springtrap care about one random guy and, if it is a random guy, who the hell would work MULTIPLE NIGHTS knowing there's a robot-zombie trying to reach them?
Micheal is immortal, you know that, right? And whos to say Henry didnt create the fazbear frights company to *especially* stop his deranged former business partner?
Unrelated to this video but I find it funny how people don't notice that in the fnaf 2 drawings it is shown that the kids have seen golden freddy themselves.
Imagine if the kid intended it to be regular Freddy but run out of brown crayons
@@burner555 that would be very funny honestly XD
Nice vid man
If fnaf 2 takes place in 1987, why would there be a reason for Michael to work there? Nonetheless, this is a really well made video. Keep up the good work!
Watch matpats timeline
@@hamcheese3532matpat himself said he cant quite solve that since micheal begins is journey in 1993 even though the fnaf 2 animatronics have since been scrapped since 1987
@@doobyv3688 actually I'm pretty sure matpat had a theory that fnaf 2 never happened because the toy animatronic toys were seen on the floor in fnaf 4
Micheal wouldve been like 13 or 14 by the time fnaf 2 takes place probably
Michael probably just needs a job. Getting a job at a place his father has a connection to would probably be a good idea. He’d have to be 14 in 1983, so he could be 18 in 1987. Seems like he is a teenager when he gets his brother *nommed.* He also just works at the FNAF 1 location for the free pizza, iirc.
Actually in fnaf world if you get the clock ending its revealed you're playing as who we assume to be Charlotte emily or the crying child as they set up the fnaf 3 good ending minigames for Michael to find and complete.
i believe you play as Phone Guy in the 7th night in fnaf 2. in the night 6 call, phone guy told the night guard that he’ll work in the day shift and phone guy will work in the night shift tomorrow. well at least that’s what i think
I can see how that would work except for one thing: the night 7 night guard gets fired, and from different clues it seems Phone Guy had a pretty important job. I can't see why PH would do something to get fired like tampering with the animatronics.
Another thing is in fnaf 1 PH mentions how he's worked in that office, and if he was the night 7 night guard in fnaf 2 and was fired, it would be unlikely he'd be reemployed by the company with the reason he was fired for in the first place.
Overall I think your theory is pretty good besides that plot hole