Poor reporting riddles with so many factual inaccuracies. They found one sad-looking person full of communist ideology and the entire narrative is based on his own feelings about India. This report is no different from the Freedom Index or V-dem report on India which ranks Afghanistan and Pakistan higher than India in certain categories. Propaganda at its peak. No wonder the external affairs Minister of India Dr. Jaishankar accused the western media of biases
That was common to muslim to build on top of other religious buildings to show the superiority of islamic colonialism. Maldives allow only muslims to live there and the media don't care about islamic countries under sharia, but they get offended about Hindu countries .
it technically is because the Vatican is older than the current temple and its vision. The ancient temple was not the center of Hinduism unlike the current plan for Ayodhya to be the capital of hindusim.
@@covfefe1787it is not .. technically or otherwise . Vatican was apolitical set up with no spiritual significance other than the fact that Christians did not have access to the lands on which Christ lived . This is actually the birthplace of Ram - with a temple which was destroyed and a mosque built to humiliate the locals . You should know history and faith before drawing parallels which make no sense .
Why do all western media conveniently not mention that Supreme Court gave the 2.7 acre disputed land to Hindus to build their temple and the same ruling also gave a prominent 5 acre land to Muslims to build their mosque. Temple main building is done but will take another 2 years to complete. Meanwhile even the mosque in Ayodya called the Mohammad bin Abdullah mosque will complete as well. It will be the biggest mosque in India n will hold the largest Quran in the world. Imam of Mecca will be coming to do the first prayers. If this is not secularism then what is?? Can you imagine a temple or a mosque being built in Vatican holy city or a church or temple being built in the holy city of Mecca?? Only Hindus will accept this because they are just happy that the supreme court gave them the 2.7acre holy site back!
Fr how stupid do they gotta be to be thinking that a government would build a religious institution with tax-payer money from a secular country. WSJ is not a reliable source at all 👎
@MISHA_NARANG_SHARMAdesh sahi line mein hain , so please stop your propaganda , World bank ,IMF , S&P and other world institutions indian nhi aur na hi India ke influence mein data release karte hain aur unke prediction postive hain india ke future ko le ke so , 1000 problems hain india mein aur ham Indian usko solve kar lenge ,tum waha hindu , Muslims kar rahe ho baised tareeke se , jo Hindus ke against hue hain West Bengal mein usko nahi bol skte , jo muslims stone pelting karte hain , CAA anti-seculer hain but UCC anti-seculer hadd hoti hain dogalepana ki , Bangladesh, afganistan aur Pakistan ke minority ko citizenship dena national security ko khatra hain magar Rohingyas ko flat dena deshhit mein , so apne propoganda ko batti banao aur gaal lo
@MISHA_NARANG_SHARMAमुझे लगता है या तो आप दीमगा से खाली है या आप पक्का रवीश कुमार या ध्रुव राठी को सुनती है। दीदी असल में वही लोग आप जैसें लोगो का brain wash कर रहे हैं। वे लोग वामपंथी हैं और वे आप को डरा कर ही अपना अस्तित्व बचाते हैं।
jokes on them... kids belonging to some years old religiion teach about wht is good and whts is not...on other hand they kill people in name of religion...
Clever. But whatever the name, the largest democracy in the world standing for a religion is troubling. Secular republic is more of a text book topic than a reality
As an Indian I’m proud of this project as it will strengthen the belief of our people in our culture which will translate into having citizens who are proud of their nation and are willing to sacrifice to take it forward. The west’s ‘secular meltdown ‘ at a project that will strengthen Bharat is thus understandable.
India..with 85% hindus..during freedom...was made secular.. till now its secular. Pakistan with 85% muslims...was declared an islamic nation. Thats the difference. Islam wasnt born in pakistan..but pakistan is rightfully islamic nation. Hinduism was born in India..but India cannot built its own hindu temple which was demolished during islamic invasion! Wow. Hypocrisy at its peak
Islam Started Education!! Now Everyone importance of Edu. Arab oil rich countries changed the economy of all Asian countries!! That’s Gift of God Almighty!! Open Phenomenon!! Not Mysterious World!! Science unfolding many Facts!! No Divinity in Nature!! God Almighty Tests Mankind To Discover Unseen Allah/God. God Giver of all blessings!! Signs of God is everywhere!
This is the superiority complex west has on east. Until they reached to loot India West did not even know to wear clothes, and these people have so much of supremacy complex on Africa and East Asians, who taught them how to live.
The Angkor temple in Cambodia is more magnificent than any temples in India with gods of Indian mythology. All primitive cultures had their gods based on mythological beliefs represented in the form of idols with names and attributes. The Aztecs, Mayas, Egyptians , Greek , Mesopotamia , Siam, Polynesia and Easter islands etc. What is the difference between those idols and the idols worshiped by Indian Hindus? Will the Indian Hindus living in those countries worship those local idols? What is the difference between those idols and the idols of Hindus?
@@atharvatar what I understand the original post to be saying is that it’s strange that Mecca is not controversial but Ayodhya is. Am I understanding the original post incorrectly?
•First, If Muslim don't follow secular credentials than why Hindu follow secularism ! •Second, During Islamic invasion of India many ancient temples were demolished and built arabic structures (mosque) on razed Hindu sits. Now Hindus are Reclaimed thier land from illegal occupation by legal system (court). •Third, Ayodhya is not Hindu vactican or Muslim makka or madina. Still u can find 170 mosques in Ayodhya & Court give separate land for new mosque construction as well. This is show highly tolerance in Hinduism & ancient Indian spirituality.
Ayodhya is a part of our culture, a base of our beliefs and holds a great place in our history. It is an emotion and much more than a Hindu Vatican. You're right.
1) you should always be the best example yourself rather than looking at others and then lowering yourself to their level 2) The Islamic conquest of India was so long ago. If every country were adjusting their borders or religions based on something that happened 500 years ago the world would be in a constant war. You really need to just let go, deal with history and just leave things as they are, rather than creating problems out of thin air. 3) if there were so much tolerance then there wouldn't be any anti-muslim riots we've seen so many times.
@@bartelgrant you know what , just stay out of our internal matters,, inda is democracy we decide what we do ,, dont tell us about history ,, Westners lecturing indians on history is a joke ,, in ancient karma theory ,, every action has an equal and opposite reaction wether that action must have been done 1000 years ago ,, nature and god does not forget anything,, you have to pay what you have done ,, in this life or next life , u cant escape karma ,, what ever u see in present is the result of past ,, it is our responsibility to cure the historical problems so that our next generation will not suffer,, i hope u will understand.
@@ankitverma995 The crime of desecrating one holy place does not justify the crime of desecrating another. Desecrating the former mosque to build a hindu temple is just as bad as the Mughals desecrating the temple that stood there 300 something years ago to build a mosque. Both are heinous crimes and neither is validated.
there were thousands of temples which were demolished to make a mosque but it is still a mosque but this place was the birthplace of Lord Ram, just as Kaaba is for Muslims, similarly it is for us it's just not a temple first of all
@@Aniket2712 my comment doesn’t reflect just this video ….even when India succeeded in its moon mission to space ..this same channel reported saying …they can’t feed their poor but got money for space missions..again you would probably reply with stupid mission….and when it comes to Ram temple …anyone with common sense …will realise that economic boost(tourism , travel, hotels , restaurants, infra to accommodate it etc) the city of Ayodhya will get in short span of time …. The live example of it …was city of Tirupati…..the Balaji temple in Tirupati made it world class religious tourism destination….the infrastructure in Tirupati was world class compared with similar cities in AP …the important fact here was the infrastructure was developed (in Tirupati) using temple revenue…you can google it …so its basic common sense ….anyway y would you see all these cascading effects when your eyes are blinded with religious hate🤦🏾
As the video made clear, the govt invested money in infrastructure which will be made up with tax revenue. As a westerner and massive fan of incredible India, this comment section is disappointing. Its illogical ranting, conspiratorial lunacy, ahistorical victim mentality, nationalistic craziness. From Kashmir to Nagaland you guys all have to get along and not urinate in fear every time a foreign media reports on something. India has such a great spirit, but this victim mentality, crab mentality, nationalistic and sectarian mentality is holding back the positive energy and capability of its people.
@@rvind000 So we can't choose to own it? What's the problem with that? I think it's great that the land is the basis of civilizational identity - for all indigenous Dharmic philosophies to identify with the name of the land, in harmony. No?
As a KashmirI, we don't want to be Muslim or Hindu. We want freedom and independence. We don't want to be part of India or Pakistan. When India moved a million soldiers into Kashmir in 2019, there were many women and young girls in my village alone who were r@ped by the occupying Indian soldiers. We have heard similar things happening in neighboring villages and towns. I hope one day there will be justice, but India is so shamelessly imperialistic I doubt it will ever happen 😢 #FreeKashmir 🕊️
Where is archaeological evidence submitted by Archaeological survey of India in supreme court?? Did u mention about pillars and temple remains found in excavation? Another thing, Temple was funded by public through door to door collection and via online payments from all over India. No Govt money has been invested in it. Despite knowing It was place of temple and mosque was built on demolition of temple... Still we gave Muslims 5 acre of land in same City to built mosque. Ask them are they doing the same in Pakistan, Bangladesh or Afghanistan??
Valmiki Wrote Story Ram as Hero !!! What’s Historic fact!! Many Philosophies People Believe, Islam Started Education, Now Science Unfolding Facts !! Greatness of Allah/God Almighty !! World & Universe Mind Boggling Facts Science Unfolding!! Signs of God Everywhere!! On Earth Tiny Earth Planet God Tests Mankind To Discover Unseen Allah/God Almighty.. Creature like Humans Enjoying & Thrilling Experiences Discovering God.
@@osmanmohammed6304its a fact that the temple existed before Babar demolished it.. I m atheist, Ram is fictional but it plays an important role in Indian civilization and tourism.. & India was never a secular country.. Its a Muslim country gives all the preference by religion, which is antithesis f secularism.
@@AnjaliD-nb7cr In 2014, our Prime Minister said the fact Karan was born from Kunti’s ear is proof that genetic science was known at the time. He added the fact Ganesh has an elephant head is proof there were plastic surgeons in those days.
Nobody in the west cares about India or is jealous of India 🤣. Also, your icon is of Bill Gates, so you think about the west far more than the west thinks for you.
Before Ram mandir, Modi govt built 262 medical colleges, 15 AIIMS, 6 IIT, 16 IIIT, 7 IIM, 4 crores houses for poor, free treatment for 6 crores poor, 11 crores tap connections, metro in 11 cities, 60000 km highways, 37000 km railway lines, 75 Airports & 10000 Jan Aushadhi Kendra
@@isleephungryfun fact no West will tell u that ! Muslim people's got bigger double the size of LANd in Same region to build there own new mosque ! Hindu's collected successfully over 200 million $ ! Also money from Hindu group donated son share to Muslim mosque ! WORk mosque going on ! From saudi Some imams got invited and first brick of that mosque is imported from mecca but hey this all do not suit western narrative😂 so u will not see all this in news 😂
@@RandomExplorationsIN No you don't know, you "just believe", doubt whether you actually believe; It is only because of Muslim hatred that you are happy with this act. You know I know!
@@RandomExplorationsIN We were talking about Babri Masjid; Gnanabapi can be discussed another day. State where the Supreme Court judgment refers to "credible evidence" instead of "belief". Nowhere; Then it is nothing but foolishness to continue discussing with you.
Being Indian, why is this anti-Indian. The temple is built, but the Hindutva movement is not done as yet and we do not know whether it will breed an attitude of intolerance (like Pakistan is today) or simply be uniting Hindus and remaking their religious practices common to all Hindus. The latter is welcome, the former is not.
I am not a HINDU but i want ask you about something....When Vivek Ramaswamy was asked about his Religion in Media and People were discussing not to vote him because he is not Christian and he should be converted to get votes....and we all know why he lost...How beautiful and secular was that and these people are talking about secularism 😂😂😂😂 Hypocrisy ki bhi seema hoti h...par western media ke propoganda ki toh seema, rekha, jaya aur sushma bhi hoti hai 😜😜😜😜
@@Wcheqkxieqqceeqaewruwabecauuse they dont vote or join any national party and also we have dynastic Gandhi family and they continue to lunch theirs family members
What about other people who don't follow Hinduism. India is a secular country.not Hindu nor any religious. these toxic thoughts in your mind is the victory of BJP where religion is used to gain the majority support from people and rule (destroy) our country. Just like the British did in past days
@@hitchcock8653: India was is and will always be birth place of sanatan. All the 4 dharmic religions were born here. Indira Gandhi under emergency added the word secular in our constitution. If India is secular first bring UCC. Also secular doesn't mean destroying the heritage of the land. Abrahamic religion don't belong to Indian subcontinent, they came from outside. Constitution has given all citizens the freedom to follow any religion, that doesn't mean roots and civilization of India will be destroyed. Just like Vatican, Bethlehem, mecca madina exist as birth place of those religion, India exist as birth place of all dharmic religions.
Hindus don’t just claim that there was a temple at the site of mosque but abundantly proved that there was a temple dedicated to Bhagwan Ram. Stop this biased bull sh’ t.
@@googleGuy44 doesn't matter let others learn about indian terms.. have you ever seen you mentioning "Bible is a GITA of Christians ' no right. So Even for your regular use we used to follow British. Start using something of your own ler others know about you. Then they will respect you.
That isn't what's wrong here. The BJP is just pushing out all other religions, and putting Hinduism in the forefront. Other religious minorities also exist and have existed for thousands of years.
@@Anilsharma12364 Hinduism is in the majority, fine. But it doesn't mean that it should be treated like the state religion! Other religions are as important as hinduism. And India is for all. Not just Hindus
Why do all western media conveniently not mention that Supreme Court gave the 2.7 acre disputed land to Hindus to build their temple and the same ruling also gave a prominent 5 acre land to Muslims to build their mosque. Temple main building is done but will take another 2 years to complete. Meanwhile even the mosque in Ayodya called the Mohammad bin Abdullah mosque will complete as well. It will be the biggest mosque in India n will hold the largest Quran in the world. Imam of Mecca will be coming to do the first prayers. If this is not secularism then what is?? Can you imagine a temple or a mosque being built in Vatican holy city or a church or temple being built in the holy city of Mecca?? Only Hindus will accept this because they are just happy that the Supreme Court gave them the 2.7acre holy site back based on archeological evidence and ancient traveller documents.
For Christian Vatican is OK For Muslim Mekkah is OK But for us Hindus Ayodhya is controversial 😂😂😂😂😂😂 Who the fukc give u permission to make a video about our Holy Place Ayodhya #JoyShreeRam 🙏🙏
For this biased media 📰: It's acceptable that Muslim Mecca stands, despite the site originally being an ancient polytheistic temple that was razed and demolished by Muhammad, who then built a mosque over it. Yet, they don't point out any controversy or unfairness here.However, they don't have the guts to raise any questions about it, knowing well that they could face severe repercussions, including blasphemy accusations, the very next day. On the other hand, when Hindus reclaimed their temple site, where the Babri Mosque had been constructed by demolishing one of the most sacred Hindu temples by the Mughal Terrorist Babur, it is suddenly deemed controversial. Wow! What type of journalism is this LOL
It's called freedom of speech, much like how you can associate Vatican for Christianity, Vatican is only for Catholics, the other Christian sects have different central places of worship. You're wrong, but you're free to talk BS. You also have to remember WSJ has liberal western values, us in Asia are generally more conservative, so having religion as part of our culture, and politics, isn't exactly as frowned upon, as it is over in the West.
What video is about : Modi Poltics Babri masjid Temple construction And politics What they didn't tell you Archeological survey Historical facts Hindus struggle for the temple Supreme court judgement on The basis of archeological excavations . EXCEPTIONAL JOURNALISM 👏👏
Thank you so much for letting us all know about your subscription changes. Please do keep us updated of any future changes to your viewing settings, as such information is downright CRUCIAL to us.
@@kenster8270fun fact no West will tell u that ! Muslim people's got bigger double the size of LANd in Same region to build there own new mosque ! Hindu's collected successfully over 200 million $ ! Also money from Hindu group donated son share to Muslim mosque ! WORk mosque going on ! From saudi Some imams got invited and first brick of that mosque is imported from mecca but hey this all do not suit western narrative😂 so u will not see all this in news 😂
-It was #RamJanmbhoomi -There was a #RamMandir at that place -Mughals demolished it & built a mosque over the same pillars -Hindus demolished it & RECLAIMED the Janmabhoomi -We built a grand Mandir at that place Now you call it Hindu supremacy, communalism, anti democracy, Lahsoon or whatever you want to, the temple has been built & nobody can touch it now.. The cycle is complete here & now it's time for Krishna Janmabhoomi & Gyanvapi...
@@notKhalid It has been narrated that [Imam] Ja`far Ibn Muhamad said: “Prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h) used to put his face between the breasts of [his daughter] Fatimah (as) before going to sleep." (Bihaar al-Anwar, vol. 43, p. 78).
It's like giving lands in return to those who attacked and occupied your own house. Court shouldn't give land to muslims to build mosque because they captured our Mandir's land at first.
@@f5rwallI don't see the issue with the second? If a prophet is a human then a prophet can be born to anyone. God isn't human so God can't be born to a human
@@yasink331 well in our scriptures it is mentioned that bhagwan or god as you say, can take birth, only after they manifest themselves in the form of human, and if the logic suggest that gods can create human, why it is not possible for god , to be born as a human, why god cannot transform itself, from nirguna to saguna, why human today constrain themselves to a closed and monotheistic thinking I can't understand
Muslim refusal to return Hindus destroyed sacred sites didn’t destroy the idea of India But a saffron flag in your residential society didThen good riddance to that idea of India
@@endofworld200clearly you haven’t been educated. It was built on a temple as deduced by various archeological evidences presented by KK muhammmad. The SC said, I quote “ it has been built on a site ( temple).” Ayodhya’s history has been painted by birth of this Hindu god. Stop lying here, nobody believes you.
@@endofworld200 read the full verdict of Supreme Court..... Five judges of the Supreme Court on Saturday ruled in favour of Ram Lalla, which represents the child deity and held that a temple should be built at the Ayodhya site by a government-run trust. The 929-page unanimous judgment, which analysed the claims in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute case, held title cannot be established on the basis of faith and belief.
@@manishgurav2369 On page 215 the ruling says, “It is true that in matters of faith and belief, the absence of evidence may not be an evidence of absence.” This means that irrespective of whether there is an evidence or not, matters of faith have to be upheld. By implication, the court has ruled that matters of faith can prevail over other concerns, even more strongly if aggressive public opinion supports it...
Unlike Western countries, India is a civilizational state. Preserving and re-establishing the monuments of this ancient civilization is important for all Indians who don't identify with external invaders
As a KashmirI, we don't want to be Muslim or Hindu. We want freedom and independence. We don't want to be part of India or Pakistan. When India moved a million soldiers into Kashmir in 2019, there were many women and young girls in my village alone who were r@ped by the occupying Indian soldiers. We have heard similar things happening in neighboring villages and towns. I hope one day there will be justice, but India is so shamelessly imperialistic I doubt it will ever happen 😢 #FreeKashmir 🕊️
Wall street journal don’t question 30+ islamic state that have islam as a state religion but question a hindu nation which is not even decalared a hindu nation
@@nazeerpasha2075"One of the wives of Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) joined him in I`tikaf and she noticed blood and yellowish discharge (from her private parts) and put a dish under her when she prayed." - Sahih al-Bukhari 310 Mohammad could only afford one Undergarment for all his wife they used to apply spit to clean and wear it that's why they suffered from various sexual diseases & had yellow discharge from their private parts. Wonder why marry so many when you can't afford to dress them. Can you answer me ?
Don't compare it to Vatican, there are many Vaticans in India which are much older than Vatican. We have built this through our 500 years of hard work; the government has not spent any money on it.
They don't know about a new mosque which is being built in Ayodhya to compensate for the demolition of the babri masjid. But it is facing difficulties because no one is donating money for building it. And of all the donations received 80 percent was donated by hindus only.
That is because mentioning about the settlement weakens their anti-India narrative. They conveniently omitted it. Many in America are also disgusted by this channel / newspaper for their heavy ideological bias.
You have to understand that a country with 85% hindus waited years for court final decision. Can you imagine any other country with 85% people waited patiently for court decisions before building temple
Indian govt take millions of rupees from only the Hindu temples. In India only Hindu temples pay taxes others don't. So it should be Govt first priority to develop and beautify our Hindu temples, cities and places. Bcz only Hindu temples are paying taxes. Other's not.
It's like the mosque built on top of the ancient Jewish temple in Jerusalem, or the transformation of the Hagia Sophia into a mosque, then a museum, and now a mosque once again. Lots of mosques and churches were buillt by colonial empires on the sites of pre-Islamic and pre-Christian places of worship. The Mughals and the Ottomans as well as the Portuguese and the Spanish were particularly fervent in this endeavour.
Babri mosque was not built on ruins of ancient temple, but it was built by demolishing it and this is just one such case of out of thousands in Indian sub-continent.
India’s economic boom faces an urgent pitfall: sharing the wealth: on.wsj.com/3UPLhdC
How many CCP money has been gobbled up under project 1376 ?
BJP 400+
Jai shree ram🙏❤
Poor reporting riddles with so many factual inaccuracies. They found one sad-looking person full of communist ideology and the entire narrative is based on his own feelings about India. This report is no different from the Freedom Index or V-dem report on India which ranks Afghanistan and Pakistan higher than India in certain categories. Propaganda at its peak. No wonder the external affairs Minister of India Dr. Jaishankar accused the western media of biases
@@TenTimesSun don't come crying for visas
@@404.ErrorM asaram Ramdev rampal ramrahim sadhguru?🤣🤣🤣
Mosque was not built on ruins rather it was built by demolishing the temple.
Left it's pillars & foundation intact & used it for the mosque
They can't tell that,,, Western hypocrisy...
That was common to muslim to build on top of other religious buildings to show the superiority of islamic colonialism. Maldives allow only muslims to live there and the media don't care about islamic countries under sharia, but they get offended about Hindu countries .
That was for political purpose just like now
They have to run their propaganda, right?
Ayodhya is not Hindu Vatican, just like how Vatican is not Christian Ayodhya.
👍🏼
it technically is because the Vatican is older than the current temple and its vision. The ancient temple was not the center of Hinduism unlike the current plan for Ayodhya to be the capital of hindusim.
Based
@@covfefe1787it is not .. technically or otherwise . Vatican was apolitical set up with no spiritual significance other than the fact that Christians did not have access to the lands on which Christ lived . This is actually the birthplace of Ram - with a temple which was destroyed and a mosque built to humiliate the locals . You should know history and faith before drawing parallels which make no sense .
Why do all western media conveniently not mention that Supreme Court gave the 2.7 acre disputed land to Hindus to build their temple and the same ruling also gave a prominent 5 acre land to Muslims to build their mosque. Temple main building is done but will take another 2 years to complete. Meanwhile even the mosque in Ayodya called the Mohammad bin Abdullah mosque will complete as well. It will be the biggest mosque in India n will hold the largest Quran in the world. Imam of Mecca will be coming to do the first prayers.
If this is not secularism then what is?? Can you imagine a temple or a mosque being built in Vatican holy city or a church or temple being built in the holy city of Mecca??
Only Hindus will accept this because they are just happy that the supreme court gave them the 2.7acre holy site back!
Govt. didn't paid for the temple, we made it via our donations😅
No, the hundreds of engineers and architects did. The donors only provided the money
Fr how stupid do they gotta be to be thinking that a government would build a religious institution with tax-payer money from a secular country. WSJ is not a reliable source at all 👎
Its possible because of PM Modi
@@googleGuy44without the money would they do it ?
@@googleGuy44Their job is to build, they are doing their job. And they get paid for it, from donation money. Is that hard to understand?
When Supreme court of India gave clear Judgment, who are you to call it, Controversial ?
@elonmusk:"Indian nationalist bots are at work!
@@BrunoDias1234Do we have to be worried about opinion of CCP members using VPN
Gov didn't spend a single penny.
We donate for our temple.
Why in North India?
@@nazeerpasha2075 Because Ram was born in North India.
@@nazeerpasha2075 because it's birth place for lord Rama
Brother I think 1 rs is donated by government ❤❤❤❤❤
@cla782 yes, I know
‘Kauravas were test tube babies and Ravana had 24 types of aircrafts,’
Modi didn't built it, we the Hindu people built it with our donation 🙂
They need to hide that
Yeah they said that in the video at 4:01
@MISHA_NARANG_SHARMAdesh sahi line mein hain , so please stop your propaganda , World bank ,IMF , S&P and other world institutions indian nhi aur na hi India ke influence mein data release karte hain aur unke prediction postive hain india ke future ko le ke so , 1000 problems hain india mein aur ham Indian usko solve kar lenge ,tum waha hindu , Muslims kar rahe ho baised tareeke se , jo Hindus ke against hue hain West Bengal mein usko nahi bol skte , jo muslims stone pelting karte hain , CAA anti-seculer hain but UCC anti-seculer hadd hoti hain dogalepana ki , Bangladesh, afganistan aur Pakistan ke minority ko citizenship dena national security ko khatra hain magar Rohingyas ko flat dena deshhit mein , so apne propoganda ko batti banao aur gaal lo
@MISHA_NARANG_SHARMAमुझे लगता है या तो आप दीमगा से खाली है या आप पक्का रवीश कुमार या ध्रुव राठी को सुनती है।
दीदी असल में वही लोग आप जैसें लोगो का brain wash कर रहे हैं।
वे लोग वामपंथी हैं और वे आप को डरा कर ही अपना अस्तित्व बचाते हैं।
@@badluck5647No, 3 billion dollars are infra project's temple donation are different
Ayodhya is older than Vatican. Hinduism is older than Christianity. But it is Hindu Vatican Project.
Well said brother!
jokes on them... kids belonging to some years old religiion teach about wht is good and whts is not...on other hand they kill people in name of religion...
This is how the west tries to control us culturally
Western media - time started from A.D.
For Hindus, civilization is several millennium old.
Clever. But whatever the name, the largest democracy in the world standing for a religion is troubling. Secular republic is more of a text book topic than a reality
As an Indian I’m proud of this project as it will strengthen the belief of our people in our culture which will translate into having citizens who are proud of their nation and are willing to sacrifice to take it forward. The west’s ‘secular meltdown ‘ at a project that will strengthen Bharat is thus understandable.
India..with 85% hindus..during freedom...was made secular.. till now its secular. Pakistan with 85% muslims...was declared an islamic nation. Thats the difference. Islam wasnt born in pakistan..but pakistan is rightfully islamic nation. Hinduism was born in India..but India cannot built its own hindu temple which was demolished during islamic invasion! Wow. Hypocrisy at its peak
Islam Started Education!! Now Everyone importance of Edu. Arab oil rich countries changed the economy of all Asian countries!! That’s Gift of God Almighty!! Open Phenomenon!! Not Mysterious World!! Science unfolding many Facts!! No Divinity in Nature!! God Almighty Tests Mankind To Discover Unseen Allah/God. God Giver of all blessings!! Signs of God is everywhere!
@@osmanmohammed6304yaa we know what your education teaches to create hamas isis alqaeda Taliban
@@osmanmohammed6304 ur reply shows u dont have education. See indias history. When education started in india!!! Come on...this much of ignorance?!
@@osmanmohammed6304 you r blinded by religion.
Very Good Point.
AYODHYA IS NOT VATICAN -- AYODHYA IS AYODHYA
This is the superiority complex west has on east. Until they reached to loot India West did not even know to wear clothes, and these people have so much of supremacy complex on Africa and East Asians, who taught them how to live.
Infact Vatican is christian ayodhya.
@@pandurangasettyvenu7897Atluntadi manatoni 💪
The Angkor temple in Cambodia is more magnificent than any temples in India with gods of Indian mythology.
All primitive cultures had their gods based on mythological beliefs represented in the form of idols with names and attributes. The Aztecs, Mayas, Egyptians , Greek , Mesopotamia , Siam, Polynesia and Easter islands etc. What is the difference between those idols and the idols worshiped by Indian Hindus? Will the Indian Hindus living in those countries worship those local idols?
What is the difference between those idols and the idols of Hindus?
At least jews will feel safe in India compared to America.
Apart from cows no one is safe in India😂
@@isleephungry your mom would be safe as well :)
@@isleephungryabdul from beggarstan 🇵🇰🥣
@@isleephungrygoats are safe too Abdul, do not panic
@@isleephungry Allah ❌ Hoor supplier ✔️ Mohammad Rasulullah ❌ Baccha Baz ✔️
Vatican City got nothing with Jesus Christ. But Lord Ram was born on Ayodhya.
You don't have to insult other people's religion in order to validate yours.
@@ashashraa6579 I didn’t insult anyone. Point out exactly where? Just saying facts
"But lord Ram was born" so ram Human or God ???
@@baroguesirohige1202he was an avatar of vishnu. He was born as a human to kill Ravan
@@baroguesirohige1202 The avathar Ram was born as a human.
Mecca - Not controversial
Ayodhya - Controversial
Yes because India is a democracy, unlike Saudi Arabia which is an autocratic state.
@@JacobMoretti-NotABot that is such a dumb reason. It can be controversial for the opposition parties, but third parties should be neutral.
@@atharvatar it’s super interesting to watch the dynamics in the comments section lol
@@JacobMoretti-NotABotthe place of religious worship is not secular by definition genius 😂.
@@atharvatar what I understand the original post to be saying is that it’s strange that Mecca is not controversial but Ayodhya is. Am I understanding the original post incorrectly?
A Vatican or Mecca can exist, but Ayodhya is controversial 😅
So true 🤣🤪
Are sab paise ka khel hai Babu bhaiya 😂😂😂
Made controversial by mugals and present day mugals
Ayodhya and Dome of the Rock are controversial for building on top of another's holy site. The Vatican and Mecca don't do that.
@@badluck5647 Meanwhile Muhammad after breaking 365 idols of Mecca : We Are Peacefool Riligion Saaarrr
•First, If Muslim don't follow secular credentials than why Hindu follow secularism !
•Second, During Islamic invasion of India many ancient temples were demolished and built arabic structures (mosque) on razed Hindu sits. Now Hindus are Reclaimed thier land from illegal occupation by legal system (court).
•Third, Ayodhya is not Hindu vactican or Muslim makka or madina. Still u can find 170 mosques in Ayodhya & Court give separate land for new mosque construction as well. This is show highly tolerance in Hinduism & ancient Indian spirituality.
❤❤❤❤❤❤
Ayodhya is a part of our culture, a base of our beliefs and holds a great place in our history. It is an emotion and much more than a Hindu Vatican. You're right.
Good to hear
1) you should always be the best example yourself rather than looking at others and then lowering yourself to their level
2) The Islamic conquest of India was so long ago. If every country were adjusting their borders or religions based on something that happened 500 years ago the world would be in a constant war. You really need to just let go, deal with history and just leave things as they are, rather than creating problems out of thin air.
3) if there were so much tolerance then there wouldn't be any anti-muslim riots we've seen so many times.
@@bartelgrant you know what , just stay out of our internal matters,, inda is democracy we decide what we do ,, dont tell us about history ,, Westners lecturing indians on history is a joke ,, in ancient karma theory ,, every action has an equal and opposite reaction wether that action must have been done 1000 years ago ,, nature and god does not forget anything,, you have to pay what you have done ,, in this life or next life , u cant escape karma ,, what ever u see in present is the result of past ,, it is our responsibility to cure the historical problems so that our next generation will not suffer,, i hope u will understand.
Initially Temple was demolished and mosque was built
Past crimes offer no justification for future ones.
@@CPTE5069 first of all what is the definition of crime for you and what is the crime over there
@@ankitverma995 The crime of desecrating one holy place does not justify the crime of desecrating another. Desecrating the former mosque to build a hindu temple is just as bad as the Mughals desecrating the temple that stood there 300 something years ago to build a mosque. Both are heinous crimes and neither is validated.
there were thousands of temples which were demolished to make a mosque but it is still a mosque but this place was the birthplace of Lord Ram, just as Kaaba is for Muslims, similarly it is for us it's just not a temple first of all
@@CPTE5069 there were thousand temples which were demolished to make a mosque in Mughal era but all of them are still a mosque
Cry Western Media! Cry
😂🤣🤣😂exactly
@@stereomachine ohh don't be sad child 😂😂
@@stereomachinethis video shows that your kind is screaming.
@@3limabeanplease dont come
@@3limabeanhaha ok NAMAZI pappu
Man …Western media really can’t tolerate India developing and prospering 😅…
Bruh what?
Their mind is Bhot ajib I cant explain its like dunia mc thi hai aur rahegi they think what they are thinking is only correct
True
you saying this ... makes you as worst as western media
also, you call this development? a stupid temple?
@@Aniket2712 my comment doesn’t reflect just this video ….even when India succeeded in its moon mission to space ..this same channel reported saying …they can’t feed their poor but got money for space missions..again you would probably reply with stupid mission….and when it comes to Ram temple …anyone with common sense …will realise that economic boost(tourism , travel, hotels , restaurants, infra to accommodate it etc) the city of Ayodhya will get in short span of time …. The live example of it …was city of Tirupati…..the Balaji temple in Tirupati made it world class religious tourism destination….the infrastructure in Tirupati was world class compared with similar cities in AP …the important fact here was the infrastructure was developed (in Tirupati) using temple revenue…you can google it …so its basic common sense ….anyway y would you see all these cascading effects when your eyes are blinded with religious hate🤦🏾
Typical western commentary
without mentioning archaeological evidences.
What's your problem if we are developing a city to a advance stage
@@Bittuji-oi3xeI guess you meant this comment to be for the video
They didn't lie tho
@@ripsanskrit3609but hid crucial perception creating facts.
@@ripsanskrit3609 but they hide the truth also. It's called half truth and cherry picking to propagate your idea.
We Hindu donated the money, government did not spent a single rupee.
As the video made clear, the govt invested money in infrastructure which will be made up with tax revenue. As a westerner and massive fan of incredible India, this comment section is disappointing. Its illogical ranting, conspiratorial lunacy, ahistorical victim mentality, nationalistic craziness. From Kashmir to Nagaland you guys all have to get along and not urinate in fear every time a foreign media reports on something. India has such a great spirit, but this victim mentality, crab mentality, nationalistic and sectarian mentality is holding back the positive energy and capability of its people.
India didn't become secular in 1947. The word "secular" was forced into Constitution in 1973 by Congress govt for pleasing Muslims for votes.
Proud to be ur brother
Indira Gandhi is one of the worst PMs India had.
yes even our original constituion has ram ji's pic on it's front page
#AndhaBhagat
@@testprofile1840does your book have stone pelt ers pictures
Christian - Vatican, Jews - Jerusalem, Muslims - Mecca
Hindu - Oh, we are SECULAR, if we build our Temple, "Minorities" will get Offended 🤗
only catholics are to vatican
Al Jazeera, WSJ, BBC s not Muslims
Because there is no controversy on holy sites in Jerusalem?
@@ntarctica They still follow the ji hadi thought
@@y57575 lol jokes on palestinian who kicked out from jerusalem..
India cannot be a Hindu nation but Kashmir can be a Muslim territory. There is no problem in that contradictions
Even tho 'Hindu' itself orignally is a geographically term used by persians & beyond, originating from 'Sapt Sindhu', land of the 7 rivers.
@@rvind000 So we can't choose to own it? What's the problem with that? I think it's great that the land is the basis of civilizational identity - for all indigenous Dharmic philosophies to identify with the name of the land, in harmony. No?
@rvind000 The term is not Persian. It's a corrupted Sanskrit term. Sapta Sindhu is also a Sanskrit term.
As a KashmirI, we don't want to be Muslim or Hindu.
We want freedom and independence. We don't want to be part of India or Pakistan.
When India moved a million soldiers into Kashmir in 2019, there were many women and young girls in my village alone who were r@ped by the occupying Indian soldiers. We have heard similar things happening in neighboring villages and towns. I hope one day there will be justice, but India is so shamelessly imperialistic I doubt it will ever happen 😢
#FreeKashmir 🕊️
@@rvind000Persia was not muslim back then
Where is archaeological evidence submitted by Archaeological survey of India in supreme court?? Did u mention about pillars and temple remains found in excavation? Another thing, Temple was funded by public through door to door collection and via online payments from all over India. No Govt money has been invested in it. Despite knowing It was place of temple and mosque was built on demolition of temple... Still we gave Muslims 5 acre of land in same City to built mosque. Ask them are they doing the same in Pakistan, Bangladesh or Afghanistan??
Half of the mosque money is also being donated by Hindu Devotees
It is not belief. It is fact that kings in 1500 demolished ram temple. Don't play it down please.
Valmiki Wrote Story Ram as Hero !!! What’s Historic fact!! Many Philosophies People Believe, Islam Started Education, Now Science Unfolding Facts !! Greatness of Allah/God Almighty !! World & Universe Mind Boggling Facts Science Unfolding!! Signs of God Everywhere!! On Earth Tiny Earth Planet God Tests Mankind To Discover Unseen Allah/God Almighty.. Creature like Humans Enjoying & Thrilling Experiences Discovering God.
@@osmanmohammed6304its a fact that the temple existed before Babar demolished it.. I m atheist, Ram is fictional but it plays an important role in Indian civilization and tourism.. & India was never a secular country.. Its a Muslim country gives all the preference by religion, which is antithesis f secularism.
@@osmanmohammed6304Roses are red and sky is blue she was 9 while he was 52
@@osmanmohammed6304sun revolves around earth , earth is flat .
@@AnjaliD-nb7cr In 2014, our Prime Minister said the fact Karan was born from Kunti’s ear is proof that genetic science was known at the time. He added the fact Ganesh has an elephant head is proof there were plastic surgeons in those days.
Western Propoganda & Jealousy 🤡
Yeah sure. We are so jealous of your slums.
@@usaanthems1295western hypocrisy
@@usaanthems1295 at least our house is not made up of material which can break easily
on punching
@@usaanthems1295 20 year old propaganda is still on your mind. do your country have UPI
Nobody in the west cares about India or is jealous of India 🤣. Also, your icon is of Bill Gates, so you think about the west far more than the west thinks for you.
We built it with our own contribution not govt 😂
No Ambani's lapdog Modi used tax payers money
This is not controversial.....its our history ...jai shree ram
This is the result of political history to divide the society
Before Ram mandir, Modi govt built 262 medical colleges, 15 AIIMS, 6 IIT, 16 IIIT, 7 IIM, 4 crores houses for poor, free treatment for 6 crores poor, 11 crores tap connections, metro in 11 cities, 60000 km highways, 37000 km railway lines, 75 Airports & 10000 Jan Aushadhi Kendra
and gives 5 kilos of free monthly rations for the poor😂
@@isleephungry of course it's necessary to support population whom coming out of poverty.
@@isleephungry 80 crore people get free ration, hindi, muslim, all religion without discrimination.
But NOT VISIBLE to WSJ and its STOOGES
@@isleephungryfun fact no West will tell u that ! Muslim people's got bigger double the size of LANd in Same region to build there own new mosque ! Hindu's collected successfully over 200 million $ ! Also money from Hindu group donated son share to Muslim mosque ! WORk mosque going on ! From saudi Some imams got invited and first brick of that mosque is imported from mecca but hey this all do not suit western narrative😂 so u will not see all this in news 😂
We Indians hate appeasement secularism..
@NotAbhaiiibyeeeeveryone hates that here
👍
@NotAbhaiiibyeee We do too. A lot of people wouldn't say it on your face but will show you when the election results are out.
Only hindu rastra
@NotAbhaiiibyeee yes we make in your home also🤣
vatican - Ayodhya for christians
mecca - Mathura for muslims
china - Kashi for atheists
brainrot
😂😂😂
Don't compare Vatican to something 😡
@@prathameshsur6806 Bro when did Jesus said hallelujah 😅.
@@prathameshsur6806 isn't he the one who left a pregnant woman in the forest. 🥲
Hinduism Sanatan and India 🇮🇳 Grows Together
Mosque was not built on ruins of temple. But on a intact temple.
Supreme Court Don’t believe so.
@@Mr.-AJ we all know the truth.
@@RandomExplorationsIN No you don't know, you "just believe", doubt whether you actually believe; It is only because of Muslim hatred that you are happy with this act. You know I know!
@@Mr.-AJ there is no muslim hatred. Is gyanwapi built on temple ruins and one might wonder why would u build a mosque on temple pillars right?
@@RandomExplorationsIN We were talking about Babri Masjid; Gnanabapi can be discussed another day. State where the Supreme Court judgment refers to "credible evidence" instead of "belief". Nowhere; Then it is nothing but foolishness to continue discussing with you.
I miss those days where dislike count of youtube video is visible
Me tooo😅
3,3k likes, 5,2k dislikes. You're welcome.
@@ramirosotto thanks mate
you can download an extention
3.8 Likes, 6 Million Dislikes
Anti-India Propaganda showing its color
Being Indian, why is this anti-Indian. The temple is built, but the Hindutva movement is not done as yet and we do not know whether it will breed an attitude of intolerance (like Pakistan is today) or simply be uniting Hindus and remaking their religious practices common to all Hindus. The latter is welcome, the former is not.
@@sowmitriswamy6718 Hindutva stands for casteless society and uniting all Hindus!
@@sowmitriswamy6718both sides claim outrage.
@@sowmitriswamy6718Easy, he is a Modi fanboy!!
They are just crying of jealousy 😭
America is a third world country with a lot of money.😂
- someone
I am not a HINDU but i want ask you about something....When Vivek Ramaswamy was asked about his Religion in Media and People were discussing not to vote him because he is not Christian and he should be converted to get votes....and we all know why he lost...How beautiful and secular was that and these people are talking about secularism 😂😂😂😂 Hypocrisy ki bhi seema hoti h...par western media ke propoganda ki toh seema, rekha, jaya aur sushma bhi hoti hai 😜😜😜😜
Oh yaa because he was hindu thats y he lost ofc
USA is doomed anyway.
They think Our Agenda our agenda your agenda is Against human rights
@@Wcheqkxieqqceeqaewruwabecauuse they dont vote or join any national party and also we have dynastic Gandhi family and they continue to lunch theirs family members
@@Wcheqkxieqqceeqaewruwa wait for your carasmatic leader shri annamalai in next 20 years will definitely be the prime minister
You don't have any mind to call ayodhya as hindu Vatican
Oh sry, Hindu Vatican over Babar musjid over Hindu temple over dead fossils over something more over earth
that's what you call a colonized mind
Cope
@@unitycatalog sorry no one copes to propaganda XD
@@avinashg4974 Atheism is welcomed in Hinduism as well btw. So don't think it will irk anyone here.
Its our land... Not your ... We gave muslims two part of our land... Pakistan and Bangladesh. India is Hindu. Our land our culture our temples.
What do you mean by being a Hindu?
@@nazeerpasha2075 Sanatani.
What about other people who don't follow Hinduism. India is a secular country.not Hindu nor any religious. these toxic thoughts in your mind is the victory of BJP where religion is used to gain the majority support from people and rule (destroy) our country. Just like the British did in past days
@@hitchcock8653: India was is and will always be birth place of sanatan. All the 4 dharmic religions were born here. Indira Gandhi under emergency added the word secular in our constitution. If India is secular first bring UCC. Also secular doesn't mean destroying the heritage of the land. Abrahamic religion don't belong to Indian subcontinent, they came from outside. Constitution has given all citizens the freedom to follow any religion, that doesn't mean roots and civilization of India will be destroyed. Just like Vatican, Bethlehem, mecca madina exist as birth place of those religion, India exist as birth place of all dharmic religions.
@@hitchcock8653 india is secular bcoz Hindus are secular, you should go to your Pakistan & Bangladesh if you have problem
Hindus don’t just claim that there was a temple at the site of mosque but abundantly proved that there was a temple dedicated to Bhagwan Ram. Stop this biased bull sh’ t.
Beta Ayodhya is centuries older than Vatican..
well said
The City of Rome was founded thousands of years ago.
Historical proof or just a myth?
So, what? The use of "Vatican" was only meant to make non-indian audience relate to the significance of Ayodhya.
@@googleGuy44 doesn't matter let others learn about indian terms.. have you ever seen you mentioning "Bible is a GITA of Christians ' no right. So Even for your regular use we used to follow British. Start using something of your own ler others know about you. Then they will respect you.
Its not Indias vatican, vatican is theirs ayodhya.😎
Ge baat 😏💪
Western Media crying. Ram Mandir is helping Indian economy. Average daily visitors is 100000 to 150000.
@adolft_officialproud of mecca build by Chinese cranes and the walls of masjid al haram 😂
You said same when the question was asked about the reason for building a ₹3000 cr. Statue of Sardar Vallabh bhai Patel.😂
Religion is not helping the economy. Religion is stupid.
@@mohammedfurniturewala2950are you from BHIKARISTAN or PORKISTAN
That’s how the international market works
What about 100 of hindu temple demolished in pakastan and Bangladesh no one will speak word about it 🥵🤬🤬🤬
pathetic to see WSJ's biased and racist journalism
Please make US and Britain secular , only 2% of your population comprises of minority religions
How is it biased?
@@JacobMoretti-NotABot WSJ is all about ROI.
How is it racist can you explain Lindu?
@@NEPALI-NINJA asli ID se aa abdullah
Why is it controversial for a Hindu Country to have a strong Hindu presence? I think this is racism to suggest we can’t have anything good.
That isn't what's wrong here. The BJP is just pushing out all other religions, and putting Hinduism in the forefront. Other religious minorities also exist and have existed for thousands of years.
@@neodenzI see nothing wrong with Hinduism being prominent in India as of not India, where will hindusm be prominent?
Secular country *
@@alphacompany4837 as mandated by who?
@@Anilsharma12364 Hinduism is in the majority, fine. But it doesn't mean that it should be treated like the state religion! Other religions are as important as hinduism. And India is for all. Not just Hindus
Why do all western media conveniently not mention that Supreme Court gave the 2.7 acre disputed land to Hindus to build their temple and the same ruling also gave a prominent 5 acre land to Muslims to build their mosque. Temple main building is done but will take another 2 years to complete. Meanwhile even the mosque in Ayodya called the Mohammad bin Abdullah mosque will complete as well. It will be the biggest mosque in India n will hold the largest Quran in the world. Imam of Mecca will be coming to do the first prayers.
If this is not secularism then what is?? Can you imagine a temple or a mosque being built in Vatican holy city or a church or temple being built in the holy city of Mecca??
Only Hindus will accept this because they are just happy that the Supreme Court gave them the 2.7acre holy site back based on archeological evidence and ancient traveller documents.
One side story and purely baised and hate against Hindu
Modi didn't put any money. It was the donation from us Hindus
For Christian Vatican is OK
For Muslim Mekkah is OK
But for us Hindus Ayodhya is controversial 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Who the fukc give u permission to make a video about our Holy Place Ayodhya
#JoyShreeRam 🙏🙏
For this biased media 📰:
It's acceptable that Muslim Mecca stands, despite the site originally being an ancient polytheistic temple that was razed and demolished by Muhammad, who then built a mosque over it. Yet, they don't point out any controversy or unfairness here.However, they don't have the guts to raise any questions about it, knowing well that they could face severe repercussions, including blasphemy accusations, the very next day.
On the other hand, when Hindus reclaimed their temple site, where the Babri Mosque had been constructed by demolishing one of the most sacred Hindu temples by the Mughal Terrorist Babur, it is suddenly deemed controversial. Wow! What type of journalism is this LOL
Ram isn't going to give us jobs. He is as real as superman, as real as Spiderman. Also, ram left his wife Sita after he won the fight against ravana
It's called freedom of speech, much like how you can associate Vatican for Christianity, Vatican is only for Catholics, the other Christian sects have different central places of worship. You're wrong, but you're free to talk BS. You also have to remember WSJ has liberal western values, us in Asia are generally more conservative, so having religion as part of our culture, and politics, isn't exactly as frowned upon, as it is over in the West.
@@jameschristophercirujano6650 rice bag rant
@@jameschristophercirujano6650leave these opiod addicts alone
What video is about :
Modi
Poltics
Babri masjid
Temple construction
And politics
What they didn't tell you
Archeological survey
Historical facts
Hindus struggle for the temple
Supreme court judgement on
The basis of archeological excavations .
EXCEPTIONAL JOURNALISM 👏👏
just want to spread their propoganda... we should report them ...
Short and sweet 👍
*This comment must be most liked!*
the journalists are third rate! what can you expect out of them? third rate journalism
Modi havent pour money in it, devotee donated money for temple
LOL 🤣😂 someone sitting in USA is educating world about Ayodhya. Using some India expert nobody knows about.
These yt imperialists still continuing the British propaganda tradition
Typical reaction of Modi fanboys who are so insecure, they can't stand any criticism to their god like leader!! Modi is a Hindu supremacist!!
He is known communist known all over Indian circle.
Mythology getting debunked.
Unboxing when ?@@nazeerpasha2075
I'm cancelling my WSJ subscription. They're not what they used to be. Poor woke journalism, what a shame.
Thank you so much for letting us all know about your subscription changes. Please do keep us updated of any future changes to your viewing settings, as such information is downright CRUCIAL to us.
@@kenster8270
Are you from WSJ?
Then why triggered ???? 😅😂
@@kenster8270fun fact no West will tell u that ! Muslim people's got bigger double the size of LANd in Same region to build there own new mosque ! Hindu's collected successfully over 200 million $ ! Also money from Hindu group donated son share to Muslim mosque ! WORk mosque going on ! From saudi Some imams got invited and first brick of that mosque is imported from mecca but hey this all do not suit western narrative😂 so u will not see all this in news 😂
@@kenster8270 Womp womp
I'm not a fan of woke stuff, but if your going to state that then attach a time index showing where wokeness is being promoted
Western media has no idea
After reading Comments box ☑️🎁 "Mera desh Badal raha hai". India 🇮🇳 is capable for giving best reply to Western Propagandist.
uneducated journalism at its best.
I agree. I have reported the video under misleading/ misinformation.
Uneducated? They are speaking straight facts. Get your minds out of the propoganda lake
Bro from where it isnt showing the option to report anywhere@@nileshparab8135
WSJ the gang of propoganda 😂
You can call them 'presstitutes'.😂
Don’t lie modi is not throwing money. It is money that people donated
Colonizers of America is giving lectures to other countries 😅😂
yeah pagans
@@amineboum9493 yeah barbaric abrahmic cults
@@vampyrexxxit’s not pain. He is showing you the mirror
British settlers became Americans and continued their colonisation, finished the Red Indian population
Americans are not even from America 😅.
westerners still telling us how we should live in our own country.
Ayodhya is older than Vatican! JAI SHRI RAM! JAI HIND! JAI BHARAT!
Its much much older than vatican ... Jai Shree Ram
Why does Ramayana have different versions? Which version is authentic?
@@nazeerpasha2075because there are multiverses in which ramayana happened by different means in different time only kakbhasundi seen all of that
ayodhya is 3 billion years old
@@nazeerpasha2075valmiki ramayan
Turkey did it same thing why isn't that a big issue 😂
Probably because the biased WSJ reporters producing this video has a Turkish spouse 🙂
@@agilephilosopheralso super woke
They didn't did the same thing . We fight 500 years for it we fought in COURT . .. they never did it ..
What about pro Palestine protest in US universities? You have enough time to understand the reality of peace community 😂
Govt takes million of dollars fees from temples. But if it spend only a few on temples. Everyone loses their mind. 🙏🏼
-It was #RamJanmbhoomi
-There was a #RamMandir at that place
-Mughals demolished it & built a mosque over the same pillars
-Hindus demolished it & RECLAIMED the Janmabhoomi
-We built a grand Mandir at that place
Now you call it Hindu supremacy, communalism, anti democracy, Lahsoon or whatever you want to, the temple has been built & nobody can touch it now..
The cycle is complete here & now it's time for Krishna Janmabhoomi & Gyanvapi...
😂here they come
@@notKhalidcry
@@notKhalid Madrasachap
@@notKhalid It has been narrated that [Imam] Ja`far Ibn Muhamad said: “Prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h) used to put his face between the breasts of [his daughter] Fatimah (as) before going to sleep." (Bihaar al-Anwar, vol. 43, p. 78).
This is exactly what the video said. . .
Wait for Kashi and Mathura 😂😂😂.
vote karo sab. bjo ko aana bahot zaroori hai
Very conveniently you didn't mention the fact that there was double the land given to Muslims to build a even bigger mosque.
It's like giving lands in return to those who attacked and occupied your own house.
Court shouldn't give land to muslims to build mosque because they captured our Mandir's land at first.
That too 50% donated by Hindu devotee
Jay Shree Ram from Ayodhya 🚩
Of course Hindus building a temple where their lord was born, on land that the supreme court gave them is indeed very controversial.
How can God be born?
@@anujsethi7845 If Gods son can be born to a virgin or a prophet born out of a camel trader, why can't God be born?
@@f5rwallI don't see the issue with the second? If a prophet is a human then a prophet can be born to anyone. God isn't human so God can't be born to a human
@@yasink331God just made their incarnation, or in easier terms took human form due to various reasons and multiple times.
@@yasink331 well in our scriptures it is mentioned that bhagwan or god as you say, can take birth, only after they manifest themselves in the form of human, and if the logic suggest that gods can create human, why it is not possible for god , to be born as a human, why god cannot transform itself, from nirguna to saguna, why human today constrain themselves to a closed and monotheistic thinking I can't understand
I'm unsubscribing this Anti Hindu and anti India propoganda machine. 😡😡😡😡😡😡😡
🤣 truth is bitter
🤣🤣🤣
@@batosato tell me the truth, then
If possible please tweet this mentioning @NilanjanUdwin
@@batosato Without lust Islam is dust. More like it
Muslim refusal to return Hindus destroyed sacred sites
didn’t destroy the idea of India
But a saffron flag in your residential society didThen good riddance to that idea of India
In Court it dnt prove it was hindu temple
@@endofworld200clearly you haven’t been educated. It was built on a temple as deduced by various archeological evidences presented by KK muhammmad.
The SC said, I quote “ it has been built on a site ( temple).”
Ayodhya’s history has been painted by birth of this Hindu god.
Stop lying here, nobody believes you.
@@endofworld200what a bigot are you read the supreme court judgement and the enclosed proofs of Ram temple by asi .
@@endofworld200 read the full verdict of Supreme Court..... Five judges of the Supreme Court on Saturday ruled in favour of Ram Lalla, which represents the child deity and held that a temple should be built at the Ayodhya site by a government-run trust. The 929-page unanimous judgment, which analysed the claims in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute case, held title cannot be established on the basis of faith and belief.
@@manishgurav2369 On page 215 the ruling says, “It is true that in matters of faith and belief, the absence of evidence may not be an evidence of absence.” This means that irrespective of whether there is an evidence or not, matters of faith have to be upheld. By implication, the court has ruled that matters of faith can prevail over other concerns, even more strongly if aggressive public opinion supports it...
America itself is controversial country
Ayodhya existed long before the said comparable city was ever conceived.
Myth or Reality ?
@@nazeerpasha2075 reality we r not Allah follower who doesn't have shape
7 min video and not a single mention of asi survey and temple remains found there.good way of portraying things one sided
WSJ doesn't care about facts.. they talk for whoever gives them money
Because mentioning the survey doesn't fit their narrative.
Unlike Western countries, India is a civilizational state. Preserving and re-establishing the monuments of this ancient civilization is important for all Indians who don't identify with external invaders
At some point in history the Hindus themselves were the invaders of what is now India.
As a KashmirI, we don't want to be Muslim or Hindu.
We want freedom and independence. We don't want to be part of India or Pakistan.
When India moved a million soldiers into Kashmir in 2019, there were many women and young girls in my village alone who were r@ped by the occupying Indian soldiers. We have heard similar things happening in neighboring villages and towns. I hope one day there will be justice, but India is so shamelessly imperialistic I doubt it will ever happen 😢
#FreeKashmir 🕊️
KASHMIR IS INDIA STOP CRYING@@darthvadeth6290
@@darthvadeth6290 what's the context here of your message?
@darthvadeth6290 झूठ। आपने घाटी के सभी हिंदुओं पर अत्याचार किया।
Please remember more than 1/3rd of India was divided and given to Pakistan for muslim nation.
Wallstreet Jornal ❌
Wallstreet Presstitute ✅
Wall street journal don’t question 30+ islamic state that have islam as a state religion but question a hindu nation which is not even decalared a hindu nation
Because no one can define Hinduism. And no one knows what is meant by being a Hindu.
@nazeerpasha2075 Dharma
@@nazeerpasha2075 we will define that don't worry and declare India a Hindu country.
@@nazeerpasha2075; says a Muslim 😅😂
@@nazeerpasha2075"One of the wives of Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) joined him in I`tikaf and she noticed blood and yellowish discharge (from her private parts) and put a dish under her when she prayed." - Sahih al-Bukhari 310
Mohammad could only afford one Undergarment for all his wife they used to apply spit to clean and wear it that's why they suffered from various sexual diseases & had yellow discharge from their private parts. Wonder why marry so many when you can't afford to dress them. Can you answer me ?
Don't compare it to Vatican, there are many Vaticans in India which are much older than Vatican. We have built this through our 500 years of hard work; the government has not spent any money on it.
They don't know about a new mosque which is being built in Ayodhya to compensate for the demolition of the babri masjid. But it is facing difficulties because no one is donating money for building it. And of all the donations received 80 percent was donated by hindus only.
Why WSJ didn't mentioned that Muslims were given 360 million to build a new mosque near the Ram Temple in Ayodhya.
That is because mentioning about the settlement weakens their anti-India narrative. They conveniently omitted it. Many in America are also disgusted by this channel / newspaper for their heavy ideological bias.
It was built with 3000 crores ie. ~500 million$. With devotees donations.
What a shoddy research 🤦♂️
You have to understand that a country with 85% hindus waited years for court final decision. Can you imagine any other country with 85% people waited patiently for court decisions before building temple
yes I can
80 not 85
@@bartelgrant Whole secular Turkey keeps converting churches into mosques but WSJ isn't concerned.
Very true look at what the 'liberal' Turkish did to the Hagia Sofia and these clowns have the guts to lecture us.😂😂
We Indian Hindu are proud to be a Hindu any problem to Abrahamic religion😮
The Indian government is not building it. A private trust is building it with donations from Hindu devotees.
Indian govt take millions of rupees from only the Hindu temples. In India only Hindu temples pay taxes others don't. So it should be Govt first priority to develop and beautify our Hindu temples, cities and places. Bcz only Hindu temples are paying taxes. Other's not.
Not a claim that a temple stood there before , archeological proof is there to substantiate the claim. Supreme Court has agreed to it as well
It's like the mosque built on top of the ancient Jewish temple in Jerusalem, or the transformation of the Hagia Sophia into a mosque, then a museum, and now a mosque once again.
Lots of mosques and churches were buillt by colonial empires on the sites of pre-Islamic and pre-Christian places of worship. The Mughals and the Ottomans as well as the Portuguese and the Spanish were particularly fervent in this endeavour.
@kenster8270 that's the problem Babar & Humayun had G hadi mentality, rest of Mughal were half Indian & grew up here along side the culture.
This is the example of US interfering in Indian Elections.
Very very very poor journalism
@MISHA_NARANG_SHARMA Gian ho aap
😂@@warpdrive9229
I am proud Indian Hindu. WSJ is telling me how India should be run. I am amazed.
Babri mosque was not built on ruins of ancient temple, but it was built by demolishing it and this is just one such case of out of thousands in Indian sub-continent.
As a Indian we are very concern about mass shooting of poor children in to be 3rd world country USA. 😔 😔
"So in the end 2000 people mostly Muslims were killed " ... 😂😂😂😂 Hypocrisy ki bhi ek seema hoti hain
😂😂😂
These Western don't have same.
Western media don't have shame.always full of propoganda and then they say "we are unbiased and free media" 😂😂 Indians media is not free what a joke
Ayodhya is Ayodhya not Vatican.
vetican is europe ayodhya
And before the mosque there was a Hindu temple, identified by the Archeological survey of India headed by a Muslim.
So obvious that Christianity and Islam (both abrahamic) has an envy towards Dharma.
I feel like the speaker have venom instead of blood in her body
2.8k like and 4.4k dislike what a journalism 😂😂
There's no dislike option. Whom u kidding?
@@ashwinpawar5325 come to VANCE bro 😁😁
@@ashwinpawar5325 You can use return youtube dislike extension buddy
There is what r u seeing. 5.5k dislikes now..@@ashwinpawar5325
Still you can know@@ashwinpawar5325
If Christians have Vatican, Muslims have Mecca and Madina as sacred places of worship why not the Hindus have Ram temple in Ayodya?