Oral Tracey appears to judge persons by their social class; what qualifications has to do with one's morals, common sense and integrity. That's why he can say that a dirt poor prime minister should never have any ambition to elevates his or her financial status. Our current prime minister has being a parliamentarian for more or close to 30 years now. The IC report did not conclude that Mr. Holness has any illegal funds or benefited from any government contract. Mr. Tracey seems to be someone who makes a judgment on opinion without facts or base on who the criticism is coming from rather then the evidence that is before him. Obviously he didn't read the report or Mr. Holness's concern. His only interest is that these persons or qualified so what they say is so, even though he appears not to read their findings. Go read the report as well as Mr. Holness concerns Mr. Tracey if you want to give an opinion on the report. What you are doing now is giving your personal feelings without reading the report.
@@WinstonTurner-j8v That is how Oral operates... Spread propaganda and misinformation with his BIG mouth! Perhaps he really can not read with understanding! Fi him time soon come!
Y u Mr Christie never certified the report and point out areas that need to be look into...base up u get a foreign fiance investigation firm which report to the ic of finding no wrong doing or illegal
Stop obfuscating the facts. These are not the references that Andrew Holness is seeking to have struck down. Nothing mentioned here points to unconstitutionality as purported by the prime minister. The concerns here speak to the need for clarity-unequivocal language, as it were.
Did the p.m in his affidavit state that the court strike down a section in the uc act ...or strike down the illicit enrichment against his name as it relates to section14.5..seeing that there was no illicit enrichment
Vegas what Dianne Jackson - Miller saying about the Prime Minister asking the Supreme court to struck out a number of clauses in the IC legislation among which Is to struck out the clause on enrichment. Is that true, have you seen a copy of the Prime Minister’s submission to the courts. Let me hear it from you.
Oral Tracy, you go one side and shut up.
So true
👍💯
GREG CHRISTIE YOU IS THE ONE WHO IS CONFUSE
Both of you always try to dis the pm but we know all of you and your agenda
👍👍👍
Them a try cover up dem shyte because them look bad. Wi nuh trust yuh.
Oral Tracey appears to judge persons by their social class; what qualifications has to do with one's morals, common sense and integrity. That's why he can say that a dirt poor prime minister should never have any ambition to elevates his or her financial status. Our current prime minister has being a parliamentarian for more or close to 30 years now. The IC report did not conclude that Mr. Holness has any illegal funds or benefited from any government contract. Mr. Tracey seems to be someone who makes a judgment on opinion without facts or base on who the criticism is coming from rather then the evidence that is before him. Obviously he didn't read the report or Mr. Holness's concern. His only interest is that these persons or qualified so what they say is so, even though he appears not to read their findings. Go read the report as well as Mr. Holness concerns Mr. Tracey if you want to give an opinion on the report. What you are doing now is giving your personal feelings without reading the report.
@@WinstonTurner-j8v That is how Oral operates... Spread propaganda and misinformation with his BIG mouth! Perhaps he really can not read with understanding! Fi him time soon come!
👍💯
How dem a try spin an obvious leak
If you put pearls before swine it will mud it up ,shut up you bias ,
Corruption at its highest level
Pnp is written all over u
all of them are pmp
Exactly! PNP wicked bunch!
Oral Tracy..You are one big mouth manipulator!
Big pnp toilet dat
The IC need to dissolve now!!!!!
Right now
Dionne..if you cudda lean towards PNP any further..Jah Jah help you!
She's a pnp fa sure and everytime she talks,prove it more
@@beckystephen3479👍💯
Y u Mr Christie never certified the report and point out areas that need to be look into...base up u get a foreign fiance investigation firm which report to the ic of finding no wrong doing or illegal
Oral need to apologize, think a fool him did a deal with but dis is how it's done present the argument with substance to back u claim
To be honest i am so confused with what greg christie is trying to say real confused
When will these 💩 house get out of our faces?
👍💯
Well it’s done, the relentless distraction, from what’s really going on, markyG,and global takeover of Jamaica.
Stop obfuscating the facts. These are not the references that Andrew Holness is seeking to have struck down. Nothing mentioned here points to unconstitutionality as purported by the prime minister. The concerns here speak to the need for clarity-unequivocal language, as it were.
So true
Henryroy. ORAL Stacy another MORAN.
Uno a dinosaurs uno must dismantle a tax payer money a pay uno. Uno a d one that is confuse and lie
I’m wondering if they calling out mikel phillips is a trick to the Jamaican people.
So why so many known persons pro pnp? Something wrong with jlp then!
Why is she on your programme.
Did the p.m in his affidavit state that the court strike down a section in the uc act ...or strike down the illicit enrichment against his name as it relates to section14.5..seeing that there was no illicit enrichment
They only spinning things to fit their agenda
Henryroy. Wat tha fuucc is greg Christie saying dam MORAN😢😢
Where is the PM using the word striking down?
Vegas what Dianne Jackson - Miller saying about the Prime Minister asking the Supreme
court to struck out a number of clauses in the IC legislation among which
Is to struck out the clause on enrichment. Is that true, have you seen a copy of the Prime
Minister’s submission to the courts. Let me hear it from you.
Mek your mouth so lean
Iie
Emily in the one orange underwear
Gn
Just look at his face real brother bulldzzg,full of shzzt
Exactly!
👍💯