nice vid, i feel like soccer needs to catch up on throw in tactics. basketball for example has entire plays set up for this throw in situation where good teams actualy have an advantage instead of 50/50 balls. We saw what this team and what liverpool did a few years back with their throw in coach. I would love to see this evolve
I guess depending on the types of players on your team, it should impact where you want to make the throw ins. Like if you have a tricky winger or tall striker, you’d typically want in the attacking third. If you a technical midfield, you would want it in your own half so there is more space to build up the play.
Nice video. Honestly I never saw much importance for throw-ins until I saw the Indonesia NT get 2 big chances against Argentina in the recent friendly off of that. It’s interesting it’s never been considered much in the past.
the in-possession tactics look similar to the "relationist" football played by diniz's fluminense and malmo. haven't watched any of vallecano but will definitely be watching a few Bournemouth games this season
Yes it does! Although they tend to look a bit more rigid than your standard relationist team. It was something I noticed while watching some of their games too :)
Interesting video - meaningful question is what benefit does that bring. One benefit would be if you had Rory Delap in your team with the stoke team from 2010. That’s when this could be useful.
That's exactly what I was thinking while watching! I know Brentford are very effective at Throw-ins but having tactics focusing on getting throw-ins and then only focusing on that could be interesting if they had a throw-in specialist
nice vid, i feel like soccer needs to catch up on throw in tactics. basketball for example has entire plays set up for this throw in situation where good teams actualy have an advantage instead of 50/50 balls. We saw what this team and what liverpool did a few years back with their throw in coach. I would love to see this evolve
I guess depending on the types of players on your team, it should impact where you want to make the throw ins. Like if you have a tricky winger or tall striker, you’d typically want in the attacking third. If you a technical midfield, you would want it in your own half so there is more space to build up the play.
Nice video. Honestly I never saw much importance for throw-ins until I saw the Indonesia NT get 2 big chances against Argentina in the recent friendly off of that. It’s interesting it’s never been considered much in the past.
the in-possession tactics look similar to the "relationist" football played by diniz's fluminense and malmo. haven't watched any of vallecano but will definitely be watching a few Bournemouth games this season
Yes it does! Although they tend to look a bit more rigid than your standard relationist team. It was something I noticed while watching some of their games too :)
Interesting video - meaningful question is what benefit does that bring. One benefit would be if you had Rory Delap in your team with the stoke team from 2010. That’s when this could be useful.
That's exactly what I was thinking while watching! I know Brentford are very effective at Throw-ins but having tactics focusing on getting throw-ins and then only focusing on that could be interesting if they had a throw-in specialist
Good analysis make more!
but why does it matter that they dominate so many throw ins if theyre not actually good? just curious
It doesn’t matter at all lol, just kinda an analysis I did for fun
@@SpreadSheetSoccer oh ok gotcha
whats the point of having throw ins?
No point usually, this was just kinda an analysis for fun