@@gameaddictgonewild777 dude they were just making a joke about waiting for a 'sequel' to the bible, how did you figure that means they're a JW? 1. you're assuming they meant it seriously and 2. it could apply just as well to Mormonism or Islam.
*Tier 1: Many people have heard something about this* 0:20 Catholicism, Orthodoxy, and Protestantism. 1:52 The Trinity. 2:46 Christmas Nativity. 3:19 Jesus Embodies Divine Love. 3:48 Anglicanism. 4:29 Evangelism. 5:01 The Shroud of Turin. 5:55 Comparing The Trinity to Water. 6:17 Satan. 6:42 Jesus 6:59 Jesus is The Son of God. 7:13 Christianity is Correct. 7:20 Adam and Eve. 8:20 Humans Are Good. 8:54 The Creation of The World. 9:17 Gehenna. 10:00 Satan in Hell. *Tier 2* 10:25 Plymouth Brethren 11:53 The Baptists and Believer's Baptism. 12:38 The Mark of The Beast. 666. 13:24 The World is ???? Years Old. 13:53 The World is Flat? 14:18 Jesus was Jewish. 14:48 Jehovah. 15:27 The First Council of Nicea addressing The Arian Controversy. 16:18 The Nicene Creed. 16:41 INRI "Jesus of Nazareth: King of The Jews." 17:23 What is Hell like? What is Gehenna? A Lake of Fire. 17:59 Saul/Paul, The Apostle. 19:04 The Dead Sea Scrolls, discovered between 1947-1956. 20:04 Gnosticism. 21:15 Jesus was buried on Friday. 21:52 Who Wrote The Gospels? *Tier 3* 22:28 The World is Square? 22:58 Genesis is Mythological 23:28 Abram/Abraham. Genesis 12. 25:36 King David. 26:28 Mathusala, 969 Year Old Person. 27:03 The Book of Enoch. 28:09 Satan is a Fallen Archangel. 29:01 Saul. 29:52 Jesus Born in March? 30:28 Gopher Wood Ark. 31:06 Flavius Josephus. 31:53 _The Antiquities of The Jews_ 32:28 The Number of Man. The Number of The Beast. 32:59 Mana. 33:52 The Ark of The Covenant in Ethiopia? 34:29 34:52 Melchizedek = Shem? *Tier 4* 35:51 Thrones of Angels. 36:41 Christianity is Polytheistic? No. 36:58 The Ark of The Covenant found? 37:28 Jesus did not exist? It's nearly wholly agreed upon a man named Jesus existed. 37:44 Shellfish = Sin? 38:35 No Rain before The Flood? 39:02 The Flood was local? 39:27 The Bible isn't the same as the original? 39:56 Jesus was buried on Thursday? 40:43 Heber and Hebrew. 41:18 Ichthus 41:40 Moses' Sin. *Tier 5* 42:19 Biblically Accurate Angels. 42:46 Revelation is Metaphorical. 43:29 The Disciples Wrote The Bible? 43:50 Jesus never said He was God? 44:47 200 - 400 AD. The Beginning of The Early Christian Church. 45:27 Ahmenotep II, III, IV Akanatan. 46:23 Samson was not good? 47:22 Number of God. 3, 7, 12, 40. 777. 47:50 Moses was not a real historical figure? 48:46 2nd Esdras? Apocalyptic Text? 50:20 The Lost Tribes of Israel. 51:20 Abraham's Bosom. A Place of Rest for The Righteous. 51:54 7 Days of Creation. 52:24 Noah = Gilgamesh? 53:04 Carrying Chairs to impress the ladies. *Tier 6* 53:18 Satan is Beautiful? 53:46 Pyramids before The Flood? 54:23 Jesus in The Old Testament? Foreshadowing. 55:27 Isaiah Chapter 53. 56:24 Q? 57:04 The Cross was a T. 57:33 Jesus Christ is Historical Fact. 58:10 The Forbidden Fruit is not specified. 58:41 Adam and Eve did not have a Belly Button? 59:10 Israelite Slaves 112 59:45 Faith and Works? Sola Fide? 1:00:27 Demons and Mental Health Problems? 1:00:45 Mary The Mother of God remained a Virgin throughout her life. 1:01:34 Satan goes to Hell. 1:01:59 Gilgamesh copied Noah? *Tier 7* 1:02:37 The World is Round. 1:02:50 Jesus "Yeshua" 1:03:29 Satan was a Seraphim? 1:04:38 Jesus said He was God. 1:05:09 Paul Created Christianity? No, he was a key figure, but not the creator of Christianity. 1:05:44 The Curse of Jechoniah. 1:06:39 Old Testament Prophecies tell of the coming of a Messiah. 1:07:18 All Humans = Evil? Capacity to do Evil things? 1:07:32 Joseph had a foster father? 1:08:25 Baal = Demon? 1:08:51 Pyramids after Flood. 1:09:04 7 Pairs? 1:09:49 The Witch of Endor? 1:11:02 Matthew 10:34-36. *Tier 8* 1:11:53 The Tesseracht Analogy. 1:12:23 The Book of Revelation. 1:12:52 Living In The End Times. 1:13:26 Revelation is Literal? 1:14:44 Sodom and Gomorrah destroyed by Fire and Brimstone. 1:15:41 Lilith. 1:16:42 Monotheistic. 1:16:55 Other gods are Demons. 1:17:14 Enoch never died? Enoch taken directly into Heaven. 1:18:02 Judah and Israel. 1:19:43 Jesus had a brother? Jesus had cousins? Jesus had step siblings? 1:20:23 Jesus was buried on a Wednesday? 1:20:56 Hell is Dark and Hell is Separation from God. 1:21:41 Melchizedek, Priest of The Most High God. *Tier 9* 1:23:03 1:23:56 Genesis is multiple books squished together? 1:25:15 Unicorn = Rhino? 1:26:04 Tower of Babel = Ziggurat? 1:26:56 Enoch = Metatron? 1:27:51 Jesus Christ's Last Words? 1:28:44 The Behemoth? 1:29:22 13 Tribes? 1:30:14 Mark 6:14-26 1:31:35 Rainbow = God's Bow, a Symbol of Peace, Reconciliation, Protection. 1:31:57 Joseph the Israelite. 1:32:45 Revelation is currently happening? 1:33:03 Neon Genesis Evangelion? 1:33:29 St. Peter Crucified upside down. 1:34:09 Matthew 6:5, Sermon on The Mount. *Tier 10* 1:34:50 Revelation has already happened? 1:35:25 200 Foreskins? 1:36:08 Earth's Age doesn't matter. 1:36:25 "It Is Finished." 1:37:09 James tried to kill Paul? 1:37:53 "Before Abraham was I am." 1:38:26 Demons are Real. 1:38:55 Numbers 22:22-35. 1:39:50 Blasphemy against The Holy Spirit. 1:40:49 Christophany in The Old Testament. 1:41:58 Free Will. 1:42:59 John Calvin Absolute Sovereignty. 1:43:15 Revelation 12. 1:44:13 Jesus and The Barren Fig Tree. Withering, failing to bear The Fruit of Righteousness. Ingeniousness. 1:45:13 Reverence for God. 1:45:55 End of The Video. 1:46:16 Joseph of Arimathea.
Joseph didn’t have a foster father. If these things aren’t mentioned in the Bible, then they’re not true. It’s like how people say that Adam and Eve had daughters, they didn’t. They had children: Abel, Cain and Seth. Just clarifying in case anyone’s confused.
@@theoriginaltoba you are not the litmus of truth that determines what did or didn't happen. The Bible itself says that there is more that has not been written.
@ISLAM_IS_THE_RIGHT_PATH1Jesus Christ is no messenger. He is God. None ever claim to be the way, the truth, and the life. None ever accepted reverence that belongs to God, but He did. None ever claimed to forgive sin, but He forgave sin. None has died and resurrected, but He did. Jesus Christ is the right path, and only though Him will you have salvation.
@ISLAM_IS_THE_RIGHT_PATH1 Such is the mystery of Christ. Regardless of Biblical explanation , you do not believe in it. The gospels and the letters of Paul emphasize on the divinity of Christ. There is not other gods beside the one true God. Jesus is known as The Son of Man, and the Son of God. He was fully human , but also fully divine. I believe in the Trinity. Such is the nature of The Father , that He is the only one that knows the hour. In the Old Testament God made it clear that they’re things he keeps from us , because He wishes to. The mystery of Divinity of Christ and also the Godhead (The Trinity) is not something man can entirely explain. You are a man, and you think you can understand the nature of God? None but Him , can understand h the extent of His nature and divinity. You are wise to consider that Christ welcomed and accepted the Honor and Glory that only belongs to God. No prophet or disciple , was ever found guilty of such heresy because only Jesus dared - because Jesus IS God.
@ISLAM_IS_THE_RIGHT_PATH1It's already been explained to you before but you don't listen: Jesus while on earth willingly gave up some form of His omniscience so He could truly live as human. Allah is too weak to do such a thing, even if he could he would be too afraid to even temporarily give up that power. But considering Jesus raised Himself from the grave, we know that His willful lack of omniscience on earth was temporary (and again, willful). When has Allah ever done anything at his own expense for you? Never. He's a spoiled brat of a pagan deity, that's why you circle and worship a rock, and why the one true God, YHWH 3 in 1, allows so many of you to be trampled in your own celebrations, or crushed by falling cranes in mecca.
@ISLAM_IS_THE_RIGHT_PATH1 sorry, all of that is a children’s fairytale too. You’re both idiots for confusing some stupid fantasy series for non-fiction
I really enjoyed how well researched and presented this video was, I just wish the Iceberg was more "out there" as even the deeper tiers weren't too out of beaten path
May I recommend Umberto Eco’s The name of the rose and Focault’s pendulum for something that will scratch that itch like nothing else
4 місяці тому+90
@2:16 Eastern Churches celebrate Christmas on December 25th aswell! However, Eastern Churches use Julian calendar and convertimg from Julian to Gregorian calendar results in Christmas being celebrated on January 7th. But if you ask an Orthodox christian what date it is on Christmas they will say December 25th according to old calendar(Julian).
@@Blue_SquidI’m an orthodox Christian and there are 2 different calendars used and it’s about half and half the amount that use each respectively. The Julian calendar and the revised Julian calendar. For those on the Julian calendar Christmas is January 7th and for those on the revised it’s December 25th we have the same calendar every year when it comes to pascha (Easter) because it changes every year unlike the Gregorian.
at 42:16 to give more context to Abrahams sin, he said something along the lines of “have WE not done enough for you” (implying that he is not a servant of God but rather an equal) which is what caused Abraham to not lead the israelite’s into the promise land
I want to believe the references to unicorns in the Bible are literal unicorns. The way it describes their strength and might makes me think of a crazy roided up white horse and that’s a really funny mental image.
I haven't watched the video yet, but I want to say it is indeed a rhino. But I have a feeling he mentions this in the video. If so, disregard this please!
@@ColddirectorThis actually makes me curious in regards to Rhino's physiology over the centuries. Perhaps they weren't as wide and fat as we know them now. Just food for thought to keep that belief in you going! I'm probably wrong, but look at how we've been shrunken over time through all the gunk in our food and cramped up living spaces.
@@DooDoo-f4v In all seriousness it probably just is a matter of linguistics and words changing meaning over time, but medieval European bestiaries are quite famously wildly inaccurate because they're working off second/third-hand accounts of what these animals looked like. It could also be a similar telephone game that turned what was likely an ox or an auroch to a unicorn.
@@gaelbrah1419there aren’t any differences/distinctions. Except human flesh. The Holy Spirit is of the Father and is the Father. Jesus is the word of the Father in flesh, but existed before his earthly conception so of the Father and is His literal image. The Father author of both, the beginning of thought, those above who he works through literally by scripture. (Edit) Modalism is NOT true (I don’t agree with the three masks idea, he can be in spirit and in flesh at the same time, he’s God) so Oneness belief I relate more to and not in breaking of the 1st and 2nd command by making them three distinct but co equal beings/deities like the Trinitarians or Unitarians. Instead of just a ONE TRUE God.
The Jesus in the Old Testament section is referring to Jesus being in the Old Testament in person. There is an angel of god a lot of people believe to be Jesus before his incarnation in human form as well as him being the one in the garden of Eden, the one that walked with Abraham, the one that wrestled Jacob. I’m sure there are more but those just the ones off the top of my head
Yeah I tried to separate it a bit but there was an entry titled christophany on the last tier so I tried to focus the first entry just on like prophecies and the like
He isn't making things up, the angel of the lord is constantly referred to as God and as one that holds all the power. Have you ever read an exegesis of theophanies?@@LoveAndBoxingWW
@@LoveAndBoxingWWdid you know that the bible doesnt mansion a trinity, so technically the angel of the Lord could be seen as the forth person of the trinity
hey jewish person here, just wanted to clarify we did not ban Daniel 53 and it is not forbidden to be read im not sure were that misconseption came from
BREAKING NEWS: Jesus said that referring to him as the Christ Is the DECEPTION Matthew 24:4-4 For many will come in my name, saying, ‘I am the Christ,’ and they will lead many astray. Why? Because the LORD is the devil John 8:44
@@Imahuckleberryerm no he said people will come in his name not that he himself is a deception and you should read John in context rather than Chery picking one verse and trying to make it say whatever you want, John never made the claim you say it does
@@Imahuckleberry So much is wrong with this comment. 1. Jesus says to be aware of OTHER people who claim divinity, not him. There are so many verses in the Bible where Jesus claims divinity. (John 1:1, John 14:9, John 10:30, Isaiah 9:6, John 8:58, the list goes on) 2. If you read the rest of John 8 for context of this verse, it shows Jesus talking to people who call themselves Children of God but are actually sinners. John 8:44 mentions a father, but if you read the rest of John 8 (something you clearly didn't do), it shows that the father in question is Satan. When it mentions God the Father in the rest of John 8, it is indicated with a capital F. In John 8:44, Jesus calls the fake Jews children of Satan, for Satan is a liar and murderer from the beginning. I usually ignore these comments, but this one is just THAT dumb.
Something, I’ve heard or begun to understand, is that God is and forever will be outside of our comprehension, but he has given us a guide via the Bible
22:20 correct me if I'm mistaken, but Mark and Luke were indeed not eyewitnesses, being secretaries of apostles and writing the Gospels based on the testimony of the apostles and other eye witnesses
Jeconiah's curse only applied to his direct offspring, his grandson Zerubbabel is given ruling authority once again Haggai 2:23. The verse that explains the curse, Jeremiah 22:30, states its to his offspring and specifically in Jeconiah's days.
Great video! About the polytheism entry, I think what it's trying to say is the scholarly theory of how Judaism was initially monolatrious; i.e. the ancient Israelites worshipped only one God, but believed there existed other lesser gods belonging to other nations. There are a number of passages that seem to imply this. To give the two examples I remember (of the top of my head, so don't take this as at all authoritative): - in the Hebrew text of Genesis, God is sometimes referred to as "Elohim", which is the plural form of "El", the word for god - when Moses and Aaron confront Pharaoh, Aaron's staff turns into a snake, but so do the two staffs of the Egyptian priests, suggesting that their gods are also at work there (the Aaron snake devours the Egyptian snakes, so the emphasis is placed on how Yahweh is more powerful than the Egyptian gods, and not necessarily on the fact that He's the only God) Of course, there are counter-arguments to this theory. With regards to the two examples above, the plural "Elohim" could've just been a more respectful honorific title, and the Egyptian priests could've been using some illusory tricks. The other thing that the iceberg entry might be trying to say is that (from what I recall) some Protestants criticize Catholics for their veneration of the Virgin Mary and the saints, which to those Protestants might appear as bordering on worship of other deities idk guy should've done a better job clarifying his iceberg entries
The Church of the East(Nestorians) would definitely not agree to your claim that they're proto protestants. They tend not to use icons, but that was not always the case. They have just been surrounded by Islam for too long. They believe in the intercession of saints and have an ecclesiastical polity (which some protestants do have) And though I'm not protestant, trust, you guys don't want to be related to the Cathars. Eastern orthodox Christmas is on the 25th December on the Julian Calendar. The water, ice and vapour analogy is an excellent way to fall into modalism and the clover is partialism.
I think the reason why NathanH83 is there, is because he is known for being a huge Christian apologetic, and usually has bad faith arguments against scientific theories (such as evolution), and atheist reasoning. He also has a sketchy past, if i remember correctly.
Actually, in the NLT Lilith is mentioned 1 time. The footnote of the verse says she may have been some type of reference to an old demon creature or something along those lines. Its in the Book of Isaiah. Isaiah 34:14 (ESV) the words "night bird" are rendered as "Lilith" in some translations.
6:43 there’s the biblical description, but also that given where he lived geographically it makes the most sense that he would have dark skin. He was middle eastern.
Not trying to criticize anyone, I have many friends who are Protestants. But sola scriptura fundamentally makes no sense to me. They say that "scripture alone" is authoritative... but the scripture they use was compiled by the Church. They don't use the Gospel of Thomas, or the Gospel of Judas, or other scripture out there that was left out of the Bible... No, they specifically use the scripture that the Church said "This is authoritative" about. So it seems to me they are (without realizing it) acknowledging the Church has some authority, or at least used to... Then, there's the one footnote to all this -- the Protestants don't use _exactly_ the same Old Testament as the Catholics (same New Testament though). They exclude the Deuterocanon -- the books of Tobit, Judith, Baruch, Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, and the two Maccabees. Debatable why they do that though and different Protestant denominations have different views on those books.
56:09 this was NOT removed from the tanakh, I have a copy of the 1985 JPS translation and it's still in there, that's a common misconception among a lot of christians
36:57 I think this entry refers to a video that had that exact title and it was kind of a found footage, i remember seeing the thumbnail that consisted of the ark buried in a cave wall, I tried looking for it but I was surprised I didn't found anything
Little tip to take your videos to the next level: if you see an entry on the list that is identical to a previous entry, just omit it from the script 🙏
0:44 Yes both will say that, but if you look at the old church and compare theological and doctrinal differences you will see that there are none between Eastern Orthodoxy and the old church. *Roman* Catholicism very often contradicts itself and is nowhere near like the church 2000 yeara ago. I dont even know how they can claim that with confidence
@@jeannebouwman1970 Of course he doesn't. His profile picture is a Z with a Russian flag. If he believes Russian propaganda with zero evidence, then it's not likely he'll have any evidence for claims about religion either.
The Russian orthodox church directly contradicts the sixth commandment of "do not kill" since the Patriarch of Moscow has declared Putin's murder of Ukrainians as a "holy war". Your entire religion is just a puppet for the Russian government and has zero validity.
If you read the part of the Old Testament, where Abraham is to sacrifice his son, Isaac isn't old enough to be speaking in the way that the Bible story is told it most definitely would have been Ishmael. That was going to be sacrificed because he would have been about 13, where Isaac would have been about 2 or 3.
I think I heard this somewhere else that the number 7 in the ancient world often meant "fullness" or "completeness" or "to the max" and wasn't literal. Such as the phrase sevenfold
I feel like in tier 5 there should be some sort of mention how nearly everybody will say: "Jesus Christ" in response to something bad or surprising happening even if they don't believe in Christ. Like some sort of religious fabric that has a stranglehold over people.
I think Jesus Christ as a curse word is really prevalent because it is a curse word that is not necessarily a bad thing, things like fuck or goddammit are provocative but Jesus Christ is a name, so it's not. Of course people should take care using His name, to only use it reverently
@@jeannebouwman1970 I'm not too sure about that one. Whenever I get REALLY rattled by something I'd cry out: "Christ!" looking for the nearest comfort. To consider something a curse you need to consider the context of what exactly a curse is I think. I'd suggest you'd look up the Bible's "naughty words", you'll find these words are typically directed in a negative manner towards someone you dislike in the hopes something bad happens to them.
@MisterManTheBestMan I dunno, using a word just because you want to express disappointment/shock doesn't really do the word favour, for me it's in one way the actual meaning, but also the intention when you say it. If you say Jesus when you might have said fuck it's in my estimation not a good way to use the name
@@jeannebouwman1970 I don't know how you insist you care about the connotation and diction of a word and then present a point of view that completely ignores the two. From what I understand about your view, it is just as bad to say Christ, cry out of fear, or say an expletive whenever you are spooked because in your estimations a person would always intend to say that expletive. As a result, you throw out the baby with the bathwater while insisting you care about the baby. Please refer to Ecclesiastes 5:6. if a man should call on Christ in his moments of anxiety, I certainly won't be the first to beat his brow and tell him to keep Christ out of his mouth. I know that for sure. Romans 10:13
Interesting thing with no rains before the flood really come out when you look into how having two giant ice caps with a habitable zone in between affects the way weather works. Though there was still rain, it was much rarer, and it's understandable people at the time would take heavy rain as a surprising thing.
6:15 - That's not the trinity. The father isn't the son who isn't the holy spirit, they aren't the same but just in different modes, or using different titles. They are different people (who they are), but they all share the same nature (what they are) To understand how one can be a different number of who and whats you need to first understand the hipostatic union. Which is the fact that Jesus is fully God and fully man, so the same person (Jesus) is 1 who, but he has 2 whats, one is human, and the other is God.
Please don’t use the water and clover analogy for the trinity. The water analogy describes Modalistic heresy, while the clover analogy describes Partialistic heresy
It is not the truth but it is a way you can use to warp your head around Trinity You take the example of water Understand why they used water to explain Trinity Understand why some Christians disagree with that example Now you have a rough idea of Trinity as we can never comprehend it in this life
@@vsr5557 My friend holds to this thought and we were talking about it the other day. I understand the sentiment but I don’t believe you should introduce people to correct doctrine by using heresies. What if they picture that for the rest of their lives? Then they’re lifelong Trinitarian heretics. I think the Triangle is simple enough
@ISLAM_IS_THE_RIGHT_PATH1 “I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel- not that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed.” Galatians 1:6-9 Jesus says put your faith in his death and resurrection for the forgiveness of his sins. This is only possible because He who knew no sin took the wrath that we deserve for our sins on the cross. That passage is simply incorrect, we do not believe that God spawned Jesus or that Jesus was created. Jesus Christ is the one true God, he is the Word, he is the truth, in him is eternal life “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made.” John 1:1-3 “So the Jews said to him, “You are not yet fifty years old, and have you seen Abraham?” Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.”” John 8:57-58 “For to us a child is born, to us a son is given; and the government shall be upon his shoulder, and his name shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.” Isaiah 9:6 At least understand what we believe before you start challenging me on things I DO NOT BELIEVE
36:30 He got this part wrong There referencing the fact that there are scriptures that say though shall not worship any other gods before me There's a few scriptures that show that there are other little g gods out there, which in most cases are demons or nephalim tricking people into worshiping them
28:30: The thing with Lucifer in Isaiah 14:12-15 is that it was a mistranslation of a name for the Planet Venus (morningstar) by early Christians, which descended in the sky as a bad omen. No Jewish scholar ever believed in or told of Satan being a fallen angel. It is completely atypical for the Old-Testament narrative of Satan. We should listen to the Jewish scholars in this case, since 1. they literally wrote Isaiah and 2. understand the original Hebrew version way better than us.
Revelation 12:1-5 is actually about the alignment of stars the evening Jesus was born. Dr Michael Heiser does a 10minute video about it titled What do the magi and dead sea scrolls have in common. Most people will probably be shocked by his real date of birth.
@@MatejaMicic No, it wasn't. In the early days, it was merely a sect of Judaism. It wasn't until much later that it became it's own religion separate from Judaism.
The lack of the Eucharist and other Catholic traditions and concepts in this was so disappointing to me. All that talk about revelation and nothing about how Mary is mentioned directly?
ive heard by many that rabbis often try to either hide the chapter as a whole or never go into detail about it, with some jewish people not even knowing about its existence as a result
I thought that 2 Esdras is just Nehemiah. I also own a Catholic Bible and there is no 2 Esdras 1:30, it goes up to 11 verses like Nehemiah in the Protestant Bible. Am I missing something?
1 and 2 Esdras are different than 1 Esdras (Ezra) and 2 Esdras (Nehemiah) in Catholic Bibles. Greek 1 Esdras is 3 Esdras in the Vulgate and I dont believe Greek 2 Esdras is in the Vulgate.
@@DANtheMANofSIPAthis is true I’m an orthodox and in our Bible it goes 1 Esdras 2 Esdras Nehemiah in that order 2 Esdras is Nehemiah in the Catholic canon same as sirach being wisdom in the Catholic Bible, same book different name
That Josephus writing about Jesus was likely doctored by early Christians. It is unlikely he would proclaim Jesus as Christ. But it is still a good historical reference.
@@Blue_Squid I would like it to be true, for sure. Nevertheless, he did write about Jesus. The fraudsters only added some parts. So, in the least, it's further proof of Jesus's existence.
He did write about Jesus and described what his followers believed (we have a pre-edit version in Arabic) but didn't proclaim him Christ or anything like that.
@@forTehMemes not branch. We are Christians united by Scripture, 1 Corinthians 1:10-13 "Now I plead with you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment." and 2 Timothy 2:14 "Use God's authority and warn them not to quarrel about words. To quarrel about little things does not help anyone. Instead, it destroys those people who listen."
I haven’t watched it yet, but if the Methodist schism is not on this, I’m crashing out and how many people actually knew about the Methodist schism in the infighting
I think "humans are good/evil" entries might be renaissance humanist outlook on humans (made in image of god means inheriting Lord's dignitas and all that entails) vs medieval church view (wretched thing of sin ever bearing the burden of Adam's disobedience)
It’s funny some heresies are on the iceberg. The water, ice, steam one is a form of heresy called modalism. It’s heresy because God doesn’t just change into different forms of the trinity.
The irony of the Catholic Church, the Protestant Church and the Orthodoxy Church is, while they may defer in certain traditions and teachings, they all believe the same false gospel… saved by works. “Repent of your sins to be saved” aka “obey the Law to be saved,” which is works of the Law, which only condemns. Another false teaching/gospel is “Works are evidence/proof of faith, so if you don’t have works, you don’t have faith,” which fundamentally contradicts God’s Word, as clearly seen in Romans 11:6 and Ephesians 2:8-9, as well as John 3:16-18, which is probably the most famous Bible passage, especially verse 16.
James 2:14-17 "What does it profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith save him? If a brother or sister is naked and destitute of daily food, and one of you says to them, 'Depart in peace, be warmed and filled,' but you do not give them the things which are needed for the body, what does it profit? Thus also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead."
You literally paraphrased a verse in James (therefore scripture) and then said that this idea contradicted scripture. How can scripture contradict itself?
@@SanctusPaulus1962 How do you quote James 2:14-17, and still get it wrong? You see a contradiction because you don’t understand James 2. Nothing I said contradicts James 2, and “works are evidence/proof of faith” is nowhere near what James 2 is talking about, nor is it implied or inferred whatsoever. Do you even know what the word “dead” means in the Greek? Clearly not. Start there, then come talk to me.
@@Nighhhts "You're not educated enough to understand it" is not a valid argument. I'd love to hear your protestant mental gymnastics of how that verse in James apparently does not actually mean what it clearly says... enlighten me.
Jesus says he is the great I am in John 13:19 "I am telling you this now so you believe that I am who I am." And Matthew 12:8, Mark 2:28, and Luke 6:5 which all say plainly "For the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath." When I see Jesus' great I am and his very obvious deity claims ignored it really strikes a nerve. Hopefully you can share Jesus' more rare but still extremely obvious deistic claims in verses that guys like Cliffe Knechtle will ignore. PLEASE SHARE THESE
The water explanation of the trinity is a heresy called modalism. Water can exist in three forms, but not at the same time. This implies that God exists in different modes at different times. In fact, any illustration of the Trinity falls short and is heresy. The correct explanation is that God exists as one essence in three persons, separate and unique yet fully combined. The term is perichoresis. The safest way to think about the Trinity is that it is a relationship we can never truly understand, but we can truly know.
All of tarses who became Paul should never have been considered an apostle. He never met Jesus, he wasn't his follower. He was one who persecuted early Christians. I believe he had heat stroke or suffered a stroke on the road to Damascus and that he just tried to cash in on the new wave of popularity with the Christian religion, and he pretended to convert to stay in power because under Judaism, he was a pharisee. Also, Jesus probably was born in March because it was at the time of the census, which puts it around the time that he was also crucified. He probably wasn't born in what we call year one, but probably 4 years before that.
Christians were being persecuted in the Roman Empire at that time. It would make no sense whatsoever for Paul to have converted to Christianity in order to gain any power. He already had power as a Pharisee. Why would be fake convert to Christianity and then die by the hands of the Romans while defending Christianity to his last breath? People don't willingly die for things they don't believe in.
As a Jehovah’s Witness I can say that we do not believe anything close to Jesus being related to satan other then being a type of angle god created and we believe that Jesus is gods first creation, his first angel who was with god as he created everything. We don’t believe in the trinity (that word has never been mentioned in the bible) and jehovahs name is the original translation of gods name (Yahweh) in to English and it is said in the bible to use and say his name. At some point Yahweh was replaced with “the lord” and “god” as humans saw his name as too holy or summin.
Concerning Adam and Eve having belly buttons or not: While on the surface it does seem like a pretty nonsensical and just fun thought experiment, there is an interpretation of Genesis 1-11 that states when the Bible says God “made” the world in the seven days it is actually an account of God making “order” of the world out of chaos, and Adam and Eve being drawn from out of the chaos and into the garden of eden, foreshadowing the notion of God’s election of people, and them being the first “set aside” as God’s chosen people. This is not in contradiction to later in the Bible where it is explicitly stated that all things come from God and by Him all things were made, rather it is a different interpretation of the creation account and fall narrative. InspiringPhilosophy has a great video lecture series on this. And it amounts to the idea that yeah, Adam and Eve might have had belly buttons 🤷♂️ and whether or not they did might have larger implications about what we know and widely accept as the creation story. Which doesn’t do much to affect sanctification or justification, just is a fun thought experiment, with a little more depth
Spoilers for those that have not caught up on the bible
I'm waiting for the sequel to binge read it
@@Wherrimy There is always atleast 1 jw hating on the Holy Bible.
Get outta here, you are banished for the 1031 time now
I recommend the Book of Mormon, it's my favorite extended universe fan fiction.
The sequel has been out a while. It's called the Quran.
@@gameaddictgonewild777 dude they were just making a joke about waiting for a 'sequel' to the bible, how did you figure that means they're a JW? 1. you're assuming they meant it seriously and 2. it could apply just as well to Mormonism or Islam.
*Tier 1: Many people have heard something about this*
0:20 Catholicism, Orthodoxy, and Protestantism.
1:52 The Trinity.
2:46 Christmas Nativity.
3:19 Jesus Embodies Divine Love.
3:48 Anglicanism.
4:29 Evangelism.
5:01 The Shroud of Turin.
5:55 Comparing The Trinity to Water.
6:17 Satan.
6:42 Jesus
6:59 Jesus is The Son of God.
7:13 Christianity is Correct.
7:20 Adam and Eve.
8:20 Humans Are Good.
8:54 The Creation of The World.
9:17 Gehenna. 10:00 Satan in Hell.
*Tier 2*
10:25 Plymouth Brethren
11:53 The Baptists and Believer's Baptism.
12:38 The Mark of The Beast. 666.
13:24 The World is ???? Years Old.
13:53 The World is Flat?
14:18 Jesus was Jewish.
14:48 Jehovah.
15:27 The First Council of Nicea addressing The Arian Controversy.
16:18 The Nicene Creed.
16:41 INRI "Jesus of Nazareth: King of The Jews."
17:23 What is Hell like? What is Gehenna? A Lake of Fire.
17:59 Saul/Paul, The Apostle.
19:04 The Dead Sea Scrolls, discovered between 1947-1956.
20:04 Gnosticism.
21:15 Jesus was buried on Friday.
21:52 Who Wrote The Gospels?
*Tier 3*
22:28 The World is Square?
22:58 Genesis is Mythological
23:28 Abram/Abraham. Genesis 12.
25:36 King David.
26:28 Mathusala, 969 Year Old Person.
27:03 The Book of Enoch.
28:09 Satan is a Fallen Archangel.
29:01 Saul.
29:52 Jesus Born in March?
30:28 Gopher Wood Ark.
31:06 Flavius Josephus. 31:53 _The Antiquities of The Jews_
32:28 The Number of Man. The Number of The Beast.
32:59 Mana.
33:52 The Ark of The Covenant in Ethiopia? 34:29
34:52 Melchizedek = Shem?
*Tier 4*
35:51 Thrones of Angels.
36:41 Christianity is Polytheistic? No.
36:58 The Ark of The Covenant found?
37:28 Jesus did not exist? It's nearly wholly agreed upon a man named Jesus existed.
37:44 Shellfish = Sin?
38:35 No Rain before The Flood?
39:02 The Flood was local?
39:27 The Bible isn't the same as the original?
39:56 Jesus was buried on Thursday?
40:43 Heber and Hebrew.
41:18 Ichthus
41:40 Moses' Sin.
*Tier 5*
42:19 Biblically Accurate Angels.
42:46 Revelation is Metaphorical.
43:29 The Disciples Wrote The Bible?
43:50 Jesus never said He was God?
44:47 200 - 400 AD. The Beginning of The Early Christian Church.
45:27 Ahmenotep II, III, IV Akanatan.
46:23 Samson was not good?
47:22 Number of God. 3, 7, 12, 40. 777.
47:50 Moses was not a real historical figure?
48:46 2nd Esdras? Apocalyptic Text?
50:20 The Lost Tribes of Israel.
51:20 Abraham's Bosom. A Place of Rest for The Righteous.
51:54 7 Days of Creation.
52:24 Noah = Gilgamesh?
53:04 Carrying Chairs to impress the ladies.
*Tier 6*
53:18 Satan is Beautiful?
53:46 Pyramids before The Flood?
54:23 Jesus in The Old Testament? Foreshadowing.
55:27 Isaiah Chapter 53.
56:24 Q?
57:04 The Cross was a T.
57:33 Jesus Christ is Historical Fact.
58:10 The Forbidden Fruit is not specified.
58:41 Adam and Eve did not have a Belly Button?
59:10 Israelite Slaves 112
59:45 Faith and Works? Sola Fide?
1:00:27 Demons and Mental Health Problems?
1:00:45 Mary The Mother of God remained a Virgin throughout her life.
1:01:34 Satan goes to Hell.
1:01:59 Gilgamesh copied Noah?
*Tier 7*
1:02:37 The World is Round.
1:02:50 Jesus "Yeshua"
1:03:29 Satan was a Seraphim?
1:04:38 Jesus said He was God.
1:05:09 Paul Created Christianity? No, he was a key figure, but not the creator of Christianity.
1:05:44 The Curse of Jechoniah.
1:06:39 Old Testament Prophecies tell of the coming of a Messiah.
1:07:18 All Humans = Evil? Capacity to do Evil things?
1:07:32 Joseph had a foster father?
1:08:25 Baal = Demon?
1:08:51 Pyramids after Flood.
1:09:04 7 Pairs?
1:09:49 The Witch of Endor?
1:11:02 Matthew 10:34-36.
*Tier 8*
1:11:53 The Tesseracht Analogy.
1:12:23 The Book of Revelation.
1:12:52 Living In The End Times.
1:13:26 Revelation is Literal?
1:14:44 Sodom and Gomorrah destroyed by Fire and Brimstone.
1:15:41 Lilith.
1:16:42 Monotheistic.
1:16:55 Other gods are Demons.
1:17:14 Enoch never died? Enoch taken directly into Heaven.
1:18:02 Judah and Israel.
1:19:43 Jesus had a brother? Jesus had cousins? Jesus had step siblings?
1:20:23 Jesus was buried on a Wednesday?
1:20:56 Hell is Dark and Hell is Separation from God.
1:21:41 Melchizedek, Priest of The Most High God.
*Tier 9*
1:23:03
1:23:56 Genesis is multiple books squished together?
1:25:15 Unicorn = Rhino?
1:26:04 Tower of Babel = Ziggurat?
1:26:56 Enoch = Metatron?
1:27:51 Jesus Christ's Last Words?
1:28:44 The Behemoth?
1:29:22 13 Tribes?
1:30:14 Mark 6:14-26
1:31:35 Rainbow = God's Bow, a Symbol of Peace, Reconciliation, Protection.
1:31:57 Joseph the Israelite.
1:32:45 Revelation is currently happening?
1:33:03 Neon Genesis Evangelion?
1:33:29 St. Peter Crucified upside down.
1:34:09 Matthew 6:5, Sermon on The Mount.
*Tier 10*
1:34:50 Revelation has already happened?
1:35:25 200 Foreskins?
1:36:08 Earth's Age doesn't matter.
1:36:25 "It Is Finished."
1:37:09 James tried to kill Paul?
1:37:53 "Before Abraham was I am."
1:38:26 Demons are Real.
1:38:55 Numbers 22:22-35.
1:39:50 Blasphemy against The Holy Spirit.
1:40:49 Christophany in The Old Testament.
1:41:58 Free Will.
1:42:59 John Calvin Absolute Sovereignty.
1:43:15 Revelation 12.
1:44:13 Jesus and The Barren Fig Tree. Withering, failing to bear The Fruit of Righteousness. Ingeniousness.
1:45:13 Reverence for God.
1:45:55 End of The Video.
1:46:16 Joseph of Arimathea.
Absolutely goated from you bro
Thank you!
Joseph didn’t have a foster father. If these things aren’t mentioned in the Bible, then they’re not true. It’s like how people say that Adam and Eve had daughters, they didn’t. They had children: Abel, Cain and Seth. Just clarifying in case anyone’s confused.
@@theoriginaltoba you are not the litmus of truth that determines what did or didn't happen. The Bible itself says that there is more that has not been written.
@@theoriginaltoba classic protestant following 16th century theology that was never taught by the church
massive cajones to make an iceberg vid on Christianity, given all the complexities and misunderstandings. respect
He just went into brief descriptions not anything complex or misunderstood
Things don’t always have to be complex to be misunderstood.
Didn't expect wendigoon to get mentioned here
lol just in reference to his angels video he did explaining them
Yo let’s go! Can’t wait to get that cryptid hunter jacket.
Ah, finally. A long and interesting video for me to play in the background while playing minecraft.
Literally me
While making life-changing decisions 😂
These are always an instant watch for me. Watched all your content multiple times now and always learn something new. Thanks brother.
Thank you so much!
@@Blue_Squid btw can you enable supers or something? I wanna support your work lol
Maybe in the future but I don’t wanna take anyone’s money, it’s just for fun. I truly appreciate it though
@@Blue_Squid I wish u the best bro you seem like an awesome guy
@@Blue_Squid legend
Jesus Christ is somebody you always have a room for. You never know who coming over for dinner but Jesus Christ is always coming over. ❤
Well I hope he like pasketti, cause we’re having pasketti tonight.
We're having science for dinner
@@joshcastro739 The people once called it mana 😂 but a gift is a blessing and I hope you aren't missing the point.
Im having sleep for dinner. I hope Jesus bought an extra pillow and cover 😢
@@biancadukes5311 you should give him the bed but your to good for that right?
Did I just see "Neon Genesis Evangelion is Canon" lmfaooo
If you're not Christian, I am surprised with your understanding. Well done.
"It is finished" also signifies the end of the passover meal that Jesus started on Holy Thursday
@ISLAM_IS_THE_RIGHT_PATH1Jesus Christ is no messenger. He is God. None ever claim to be the way, the truth, and the life. None ever accepted reverence that belongs to God, but He did. None ever claimed to forgive sin, but He forgave sin. None has died and resurrected, but He did.
Jesus Christ is the right path, and only though Him will you have salvation.
@ISLAM_IS_THE_RIGHT_PATH1 Such is the mystery of Christ. Regardless of Biblical explanation , you do not believe in it. The gospels and the letters of Paul emphasize on the divinity of Christ. There is not other gods beside the one true God. Jesus is known as The Son of Man, and the Son of God. He was fully human , but also fully divine.
I believe in the Trinity. Such is the nature of The Father , that He is the only one that knows the hour. In the Old Testament God made it clear that they’re things he keeps from us , because He wishes to. The mystery of Divinity of Christ and also the Godhead (The Trinity) is not something man can entirely explain.
You are a man, and you think you can understand the nature of God? None but Him , can understand h the extent of His nature and divinity. You are wise to consider that Christ welcomed and accepted the Honor and Glory that only belongs to God. No prophet or disciple , was ever found guilty of such heresy because only Jesus dared - because Jesus IS God.
Christ God has two natures. He is fully human and fully God. “God became man so that man might become god." - St. Athanasious
@ISLAM_IS_THE_RIGHT_PATH1It's already been explained to you before but you don't listen: Jesus while on earth willingly gave up some form of His omniscience so He could truly live as human. Allah is too weak to do such a thing, even if he could he would be too afraid to even temporarily give up that power. But considering Jesus raised Himself from the grave, we know that His willful lack of omniscience on earth was temporary (and again, willful).
When has Allah ever done anything at his own expense for you? Never. He's a spoiled brat of a pagan deity, that's why you circle and worship a rock, and why the one true God, YHWH 3 in 1, allows so many of you to be trampled in your own celebrations, or crushed by falling cranes in mecca.
Are you referring to the porphura?
He is the way, the truth and life.
Amén.
@ISLAM_IS_THE_RIGHT_PATH1 Allah is just another scam from satan. Yaweh is God
He isn’t
And he’s been dead for a super long time
Wake up ya dummy.
Wait till you hear about Santa Claus…
@ISLAM_IS_THE_RIGHT_PATH1 your religion comes 600 years later with no eye witnesess of christ and claims he isnt god
@ISLAM_IS_THE_RIGHT_PATH1 sorry, all of that is a children’s fairytale too.
You’re both idiots for confusing some stupid fantasy series for non-fiction
This video helped me regain my fire for reading the Bible, very edifying and informative thank you 🙏
Wow im Catholic myself and im surprised how well and factual you presented this 👏
I really enjoyed how well researched and presented this video was, I just wish the Iceberg was more "out there" as even the deeper tiers weren't too out of beaten path
Thank you!! And Yeah true I love those entries
May I recommend Umberto Eco’s The name of the rose and Focault’s pendulum for something that will scratch that itch like nothing else
@2:16 Eastern Churches celebrate Christmas on December 25th aswell! However, Eastern Churches use Julian calendar and convertimg from Julian to Gregorian calendar results in Christmas being celebrated on January 7th. But if you ask an Orthodox christian what date it is on Christmas they will say December 25th according to old calendar(Julian).
Ah thank you for clarifying that!
yes it is true i am Conservative Orthodox Christian
@@Blue_SquidI’m an orthodox Christian and there are 2 different calendars used and it’s about half and half the amount that use each respectively. The Julian calendar and the revised Julian calendar. For those on the Julian calendar Christmas is January 7th and for those on the revised it’s December 25th we have the same calendar every year when it comes to pascha (Easter) because it changes every year unlike the Gregorian.
The eastern churches are just a split from the original apostate church that mixed paganism into it.
@@joshportie No, what you just wrote is wrong on so many levels.
at 42:16 to give more context to Abrahams sin, he said something along the lines of “have WE not done enough for you” (implying that he is not a servant of God but rather an equal) which is what caused Abraham to not lead the israelite’s into the promise land
I want to believe the references to unicorns in the Bible are literal unicorns. The way it describes their strength and might makes me think of a crazy roided up white horse and that’s a really funny mental image.
That’d be awesome
I haven't watched the video yet, but I want to say it is indeed a rhino. But I have a feeling he mentions this in the video. If so, disregard this please!
@@PrototypeScope Yeah he does mention it, but it will always be an angry roided horse in my heart.
@@ColddirectorThis actually makes me curious in regards to Rhino's physiology over the centuries. Perhaps they weren't as wide and fat as we know them now. Just food for thought to keep that belief in you going! I'm probably wrong, but look at how we've been shrunken over time through all the gunk in our food and cramped up living spaces.
@@DooDoo-f4v In all seriousness it probably just is a matter of linguistics and words changing meaning over time, but medieval European bestiaries are quite famously wildly inaccurate because they're working off second/third-hand accounts of what these animals looked like. It could also be a similar telephone game that turned what was likely an ox or an auroch to a unicorn.
5:57 "That's modalism, Patrick!"
“That’s heresy, excommunicate him!”
Trash meme, that ruined how we see the trinity in examples.
@@Jiujitsuspecialist heresy is heresy
@@insertnamehere_262that’s not what the heresy is tho. The heresy of modalism is to say that there aren’t personal differences between the 3 persons
@@gaelbrah1419there aren’t any differences/distinctions. Except human flesh.
The Holy Spirit is of the Father and is the Father.
Jesus is the word of the Father in flesh, but existed before his earthly conception so of the Father and is His literal image.
The Father author of both, the beginning of thought, those above who he works through literally by scripture.
(Edit) Modalism is NOT true (I don’t agree with the three masks idea, he can be in spirit and in flesh at the same time, he’s God) so Oneness belief I relate more to and not in breaking of the 1st and 2nd command by making them three distinct but co equal beings/deities like the Trinitarians or Unitarians. Instead of just a ONE TRUE God.
Loved it. Another please!
The Jesus in the Old Testament section is referring to Jesus being in the Old Testament in person. There is an angel of god a lot of people believe to be Jesus before his incarnation in human form as well as him being the one in the garden of Eden, the one that walked with Abraham, the one that wrestled Jacob. I’m sure there are more but those just the ones off the top of my head
Yeah I tried to separate it a bit but there was an entry titled christophany on the last tier so I tried to focus the first entry just on like prophecies and the like
The Bible doesn’t say so best to make no assumptions, if it’s in the Bible then you can interpret but if it’s not then don’t try to make things up
He isn't making things up, the angel of the lord is constantly referred to as God and as one that holds all the power. Have you ever read an exegesis of theophanies?@@LoveAndBoxingWW
That one time david saw the angel of the Lord, and reffered to him as God
@@LoveAndBoxingWWdid you know that the bible doesnt mansion a trinity, so technically the angel of the Lord could be seen as the forth person of the trinity
Hey this video is really cool , thanks for covering this iceberg
hey jewish person here, just wanted to clarify we did not ban Daniel 53 and it is not forbidden to be read im not sure were that misconseption came from
30:51 i love wood resistant wood (amazing video man i love these formates!)
Christ is king
Amen and always will be
good goyim worship the jew
Christ is king
Shellfish is sin
@@BKalldayization of… what? You know he’s been dead for 2k years and even when he was alive, he wasn’t the king of anything.
Just a Palestinian hippie
Christianity is the only Truth✝️✝️✝️
The Lord Jesus Christ is God✝️✝️✝️
God is real✝️✝️✝️
BREAKING NEWS:
Jesus said that referring to him as the Christ Is the DECEPTION
Matthew 24:4-4
For many will come in my name, saying, ‘I am the Christ,’ and they will lead many astray.
Why? Because the LORD is the devil
John 8:44
@@Imahuckleberryerm no he said people will come in his name not that he himself is a deception and you should read John in context rather than Chery picking one verse and trying to make it say whatever you want, John never made the claim you say it does
Facts ✝✝✝
@@Imahuckleberry So much is wrong with this comment.
1. Jesus says to be aware of OTHER people who claim divinity, not him. There are so many verses in the Bible where Jesus claims divinity. (John 1:1, John 14:9, John 10:30, Isaiah 9:6, John 8:58, the list goes on)
2. If you read the rest of John 8 for context of this verse, it shows Jesus talking to people who call themselves Children of God but are actually sinners. John 8:44 mentions a father, but if you read the rest of John 8 (something you clearly didn't do), it shows that the father in question is Satan. When it mentions God the Father in the rest of John 8, it is indicated with a capital F. In John 8:44, Jesus calls the fake Jews children of Satan, for Satan is a liar and murderer from the beginning.
I usually ignore these comments, but this one is just THAT dumb.
@@ImahuckleberryThere are literally verses where people talk about “The Christ” and He outright says “I am He.”
Something, I’ve heard or begun to understand, is that God is and forever will be outside of our comprehension, but he has given us a guide via the Bible
22:20 correct me if I'm mistaken, but Mark and Luke were indeed not eyewitnesses, being secretaries of apostles and writing the Gospels based on the testimony of the apostles and other eye witnesses
Imagine a the church schisming over the argument on if Adam and Eve had belly buttons.
that would require an umbilical cord plenty of people dont have belly buttons like veggie tales....my wrestling coach did not have a belly button irl
I loved your Abrahamic religion videos. This deserves more views! Great work 👏
Did he explain there's only one Abrahamic religion? The bible.
Jeconiah's curse only applied to his direct offspring, his grandson Zerubbabel is given ruling authority once again Haggai 2:23. The verse that explains the curse, Jeremiah 22:30, states its to his offspring and specifically in Jeconiah's days.
Great video!
About the polytheism entry, I think what it's trying to say is the scholarly theory of how Judaism was initially monolatrious; i.e. the ancient Israelites worshipped only one God, but believed there existed other lesser gods belonging to other nations.
There are a number of passages that seem to imply this. To give the two examples I remember (of the top of my head, so don't take this as at all authoritative):
- in the Hebrew text of Genesis, God is sometimes referred to as "Elohim", which is the plural form of "El", the word for god
- when Moses and Aaron confront Pharaoh, Aaron's staff turns into a snake, but so do the two staffs of the Egyptian priests, suggesting that their gods are also at work there (the Aaron snake devours the Egyptian snakes, so the emphasis is placed on how Yahweh is more powerful than the Egyptian gods, and not necessarily on the fact that He's the only God)
Of course, there are counter-arguments to this theory. With regards to the two examples above, the plural "Elohim" could've just been a more respectful honorific title, and the Egyptian priests could've been using some illusory tricks.
The other thing that the iceberg entry might be trying to say is that (from what I recall) some Protestants criticize Catholics for their veneration of the Virgin Mary and the saints, which to those Protestants might appear as bordering on worship of other deities
idk guy should've done a better job clarifying his iceberg entries
As an atheist interested in theology I totally appreciate this! I find religion and how society is affected by it interesting
The Church of the East(Nestorians) would definitely not agree to your claim that they're proto protestants. They tend not to use icons, but that was not always the case. They have just been surrounded by Islam for too long. They believe in the intercession of saints and have an ecclesiastical polity (which some protestants do have) And though I'm not protestant, trust, you guys don't want to be related to the Cathars.
Eastern orthodox Christmas is on the 25th December on the Julian Calendar.
The water, ice and vapour analogy is an excellent way to fall into modalism and the clover is partialism.
really clear and fair informative video. as a catholic, i approve
I think the reason why NathanH83 is there, is because he is known for being a huge Christian apologetic, and usually has bad faith arguments against scientific theories (such as evolution), and atheist reasoning. He also has a sketchy past, if i remember correctly.
Actually, in the NLT Lilith is mentioned 1 time.
The footnote of the verse says she may have been some type of reference to an old demon creature or something along those lines.
Its in the Book of Isaiah.
Isaiah 34:14 (ESV) the words "night bird" are rendered as "Lilith" in some translations.
Lilith is Ishtar
@@TheFreeThought no.
16:55 they even marked the long vowels in Latin, so nice of them!😮
Just finished neon genesis evangelion and came across this video, can confirm, definitely biblical canon
I'm 20secs in and I see "carry chairs to impress" this is gonna be a great video
1:00:00
Marry had other kids Jesus mentions his brothers a few times and Greek is very clear that use of brother means sibling
That's literally the opposite of the truth. The Greek word for "brother" can also mean "cousin" or simply "friend"
6:43 there’s the biblical description, but also that given where he lived geographically it makes the most sense that he would have dark skin. He was middle eastern.
Except middle eastern people do not have dark skin. At best, their skin tone is tanned. Does Assad look black to you? Or the Ayatollah of Iran?
Not trying to criticize anyone, I have many friends who are Protestants. But sola scriptura fundamentally makes no sense to me. They say that "scripture alone" is authoritative... but the scripture they use was compiled by the Church. They don't use the Gospel of Thomas, or the Gospel of Judas, or other scripture out there that was left out of the Bible... No, they specifically use the scripture that the Church said "This is authoritative" about. So it seems to me they are (without realizing it) acknowledging the Church has some authority, or at least used to...
Then, there's the one footnote to all this -- the Protestants don't use _exactly_ the same Old Testament as the Catholics (same New Testament though). They exclude the Deuterocanon -- the books of Tobit, Judith, Baruch, Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, and the two Maccabees. Debatable why they do that though and different Protestant denominations have different views on those books.
37:05 I heard from my theology teacher the ark was melted for gold, idk if it’s true, but thought I’d put that out there
This iceberg was absolutely MASSIVE...
56:09 this was NOT removed from the tanakh, I have a copy of the 1985 JPS translation and it's still in there, that's a common misconception among a lot of christians
36:57 I think this entry refers to a video that had that exact title and it was kind of a found footage, i remember seeing the thumbnail that consisted of the ark buried in a cave wall, I tried looking for it but I was surprised I didn't found anything
Little tip to take your videos to the next level: if you see an entry on the list that is identical to a previous entry, just omit it from the script 🙏
what religion are you?
God bless you man thanks for the vid ✝️👍💪🔥
0:44 Yes both will say that, but if you look at the old church and compare theological and doctrinal differences you will see that there are none between Eastern Orthodoxy and the old church. *Roman* Catholicism very often contradicts itself and is nowhere near like the church 2000 yeara ago. I dont even know how they can claim that with confidence
Do you have examples of this?
@@jeannebouwman1970 Of course he doesn't. His profile picture is a Z with a Russian flag. If he believes Russian propaganda with zero evidence, then it's not likely he'll have any evidence for claims about religion either.
The Russian orthodox church directly contradicts the sixth commandment of "do not kill" since the Patriarch of Moscow has declared Putin's murder of Ukrainians as a "holy war". Your entire religion is just a puppet for the Russian government and has zero validity.
If you read the part of the Old Testament, where Abraham is to sacrifice his son, Isaac isn't old enough to be speaking in the way that the Bible story is told it most definitely would have been Ishmael. That was going to be sacrificed because he would have been about 13, where Isaac would have been about 2 or 3.
I think I heard this somewhere else that the number 7 in the ancient world often meant "fullness" or "completeness" or "to the max" and wasn't literal. Such as the phrase sevenfold
Thats gotta be Religion for Breakfast video about that number
I feel like in tier 5 there should be some sort of mention how nearly everybody will say: "Jesus Christ" in response to something bad or surprising happening even if they don't believe in Christ. Like some sort of religious fabric that has a stranglehold over people.
wow i never thought of it like that
I think Jesus Christ as a curse word is really prevalent because it is a curse word that is not necessarily a bad thing, things like fuck or goddammit are provocative but Jesus Christ is a name, so it's not. Of course people should take care using His name, to only use it reverently
@@jeannebouwman1970 I'm not too sure about that one. Whenever I get REALLY rattled by something I'd cry out: "Christ!" looking for the nearest comfort. To consider something a curse you need to consider the context of what exactly a curse is I think. I'd suggest you'd look up the Bible's "naughty words", you'll find these words are typically directed in a negative manner towards someone you dislike in the hopes something bad happens to them.
@MisterManTheBestMan I dunno, using a word just because you want to express disappointment/shock doesn't really do the word favour, for me it's in one way the actual meaning, but also the intention when you say it. If you say Jesus when you might have said fuck it's in my estimation not a good way to use the name
@@jeannebouwman1970
I don't know how you insist you care about the connotation and diction of a word and then present a point of view that completely ignores the two. From what I understand about your view, it is just as bad to say Christ, cry out of fear, or say an expletive whenever you are spooked because in your estimations a person would always intend to say that expletive. As a result, you throw out the baby with the bathwater while insisting you care about the baby. Please refer to Ecclesiastes 5:6.
if a man should call on Christ in his moments of anxiety, I certainly won't be the first to beat his brow and tell him to keep Christ out of his mouth. I know that for sure. Romans 10:13
Interesting thing with no rains before the flood really come out when you look into how having two giant ice caps with a habitable zone in between affects the way weather works. Though there was still rain, it was much rarer, and it's understandable people at the time would take heavy rain as a surprising thing.
6:15 - That's not the trinity.
The father isn't the son who isn't the holy spirit, they aren't the same but just in different modes, or using different titles.
They are different people (who they are), but they all share the same nature (what they are)
To understand how one can be a different number of who and whats you need to first understand the hipostatic union.
Which is the fact that Jesus is fully God and fully man, so the same person (Jesus) is 1 who, but he has 2 whats, one is human, and the other is God.
Hey brotha Thankyou for making this video! Was wondering if you can share where you get all these pictures from they are beautiful
Mostly just from searching the topics up on Google images lol
Thank your so much for this video
Please don’t use the water and clover analogy for the trinity. The water analogy describes Modalistic heresy, while the clover analogy describes Partialistic heresy
It is not the truth but it is a way you can use to warp your head around Trinity
You take the example of water
Understand why they used water to explain Trinity
Understand why some Christians disagree with that example
Now you have a rough idea of Trinity as we can never comprehend it in this life
@@vsr5557 My friend holds to this thought and we were talking about it the other day. I understand the sentiment but I don’t believe you should introduce people to correct doctrine by using heresies. What if they picture that for the rest of their lives? Then they’re lifelong Trinitarian heretics. I think the Triangle is simple enough
@ISLAM_IS_THE_RIGHT_PATH1
“I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel- not that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed.”
Galatians 1:6-9
Jesus says put your faith in his death and resurrection for the forgiveness of his sins. This is only possible because He who knew no sin took the wrath that we deserve for our sins on the cross. That passage is simply incorrect, we do not believe that God spawned Jesus or that Jesus was created. Jesus Christ is the one true God, he is the Word, he is the truth, in him is eternal life
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made.”
John 1:1-3
“So the Jews said to him, “You are not yet fifty years old, and have you seen Abraham?” Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.””
John 8:57-58
“For to us a child is born, to us a son is given; and the government shall be upon his shoulder, and his name shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.”
Isaiah 9:6
At least understand what we believe before you start challenging me on things I DO NOT BELIEVE
@ISLAM_IS_THE_RIGHT_PATH1did you really think this was gonna convert people
Any analogy is a heresy of some kind, God is unlike anything that’s why he’s God
Psyched because Im bejng gifted a bible this Christmas, pdf just aint the same as a book
36:30
He got this part wrong
There referencing the fact that there are scriptures that say though shall not worship any other gods before me
There's a few scriptures that show that there are other little g gods out there, which in most cases are demons or nephalim tricking people into worshiping them
Great video
Thank you!
@18:46 dang that sounds so interesting, can’t wait to reach season 25 of the Bible
28:30: The thing with Lucifer in Isaiah 14:12-15 is that it was a mistranslation of a name for the Planet Venus (morningstar) by early Christians, which descended in the sky as a bad omen. No Jewish scholar ever believed in or told of Satan being a fallen angel. It is completely atypical for the Old-Testament narrative of Satan. We should listen to the Jewish scholars in this case, since 1. they literally wrote Isaiah and 2. understand the original Hebrew version way better than us.
Revelation 12:1-5 is actually about the alignment of stars the evening Jesus was born. Dr Michael Heiser does a 10minute video about it titled What do the magi and dead sea scrolls have in common. Most people will probably be shocked by his real date of birth.
I think by saying that Paul created Christianity they mean that he made it a religion while before was mostly a philosophical movement. 1:05:10
That makes no sense christianity was always a religion
@@MatejaMicic Sorry I meant in Jesus time
@@MatejaMicic No, it wasn't. In the early days, it was merely a sect of Judaism. It wasn't until much later that it became it's own religion separate from Judaism.
The lack of the Eucharist and other Catholic traditions and concepts in this was so disappointing to me. All that talk about revelation and nothing about how Mary is mentioned directly?
I'm surprised you didn't mention that the flood didn't happen until just after Methuselah died at 969 years old.
Great video!
Clarification: Isiah 53 was never taken out of the TaNaCh, and it is NOT forbidden for jews to read it
But they did remove Daniel from the prophets when he's THE prophet.
@@joshportie remove him from what?
@joshportie he's in the "Ch" section of TaNaCh
ive heard by many that rabbis often try to either hide the chapter as a whole or never go into detail about it, with some jewish people not even knowing about its existence as a result
@@KamilxdI think I read that this is due to the spiritual complexity of the book and that it may hinder those who are not ready
You're such a boss.
I thought that 2 Esdras is just Nehemiah. I also own a Catholic Bible and there is no 2 Esdras 1:30, it goes up to 11 verses like Nehemiah in the Protestant Bible. Am I missing something?
1 and 2 Esdras are different than 1 Esdras (Ezra) and 2 Esdras (Nehemiah) in Catholic Bibles. Greek 1 Esdras is 3 Esdras in the Vulgate and I dont believe Greek 2 Esdras is in the Vulgate.
@@DANtheMANofSIPAthis is true I’m an orthodox and in our Bible it goes 1 Esdras 2 Esdras Nehemiah in that order 2 Esdras is Nehemiah in the Catholic canon same as sirach being wisdom in the Catholic Bible, same book different name
British occultist Aleister Crowley's father was a Plymouth Brethren minister.
That Josephus writing about Jesus was likely doctored by early Christians. It is unlikely he would proclaim Jesus as Christ. But it is still a good historical reference.
I’ve heard about that, I’ve heard there were also rumors that he converted to Christianity but I think they come from the Middle Ages iirc
@@Blue_Squid I would like it to be true, for sure. Nevertheless, he did write about Jesus. The fraudsters only added some parts. So, in the least, it's further proof of Jesus's existence.
He did write about Jesus and described what his followers believed (we have a pre-edit version in Arabic) but didn't proclaim him Christ or anything like that.
@@joshuaparsons887 That's right
most scholars agree that Josephus's writings on Jesus were authentic, it was just edited later by Christians
Finally found a video that isn’t wendigoon
As a Christian I love this type of stuff. There's so much from Christ's time and of the Bible that we still dont know
We know what we need, and thats enough 🙏
Helps us learn more too from theories from different denominations. Will never know everything. But every branch has its place
@@whosflair3716Amen🙏
@@forTehMemes not branch. We are Christians united by Scripture, 1 Corinthians 1:10-13
"Now I plead with you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment." and 2 Timothy 2:14
"Use God's authority and warn them not to quarrel about words. To quarrel about little things does not help anyone. Instead, it destroys those people who listen."
I haven’t watched it yet, but if the Methodist schism is not on this, I’m crashing out and how many people actually knew about the Methodist schism in the infighting
This day is indeed very P O G
May the Lord God bless all of you.
I am not of Christian Faith but I love this video man keep it up Knowledge must Prevail ❤❤
Underrated fs
I think "humans are good/evil" entries might be renaissance humanist outlook on humans (made in image of god means inheriting Lord's dignitas and all that entails) vs medieval church view (wretched thing of sin ever bearing the burden of Adam's disobedience)
It’s funny some heresies are on the iceberg. The water, ice, steam one is a form of heresy called modalism. It’s heresy because God doesn’t just change into different forms of the trinity.
This stuff is incredible
6:05 still water 💀🙏 those who know
Fun fact: did you that a Jeroboam is a unit of measurement for a bottle of wine which is one bottle made up of four smaller bottles of wine.
What's the name of the music ?
It’s from castlevania iv, it’s the secret room song but an extended version
Christ is King
The irony of the Catholic Church, the Protestant Church and the Orthodoxy Church is, while they may defer in certain traditions and teachings, they all believe the same false gospel… saved by works. “Repent of your sins to be saved” aka “obey the Law to be saved,” which is works of the Law, which only condemns. Another false teaching/gospel is “Works are evidence/proof of faith, so if you don’t have works, you don’t have faith,” which fundamentally contradicts God’s Word, as clearly seen in Romans 11:6 and Ephesians 2:8-9, as well as John 3:16-18, which is probably the most famous Bible passage, especially verse 16.
James 2:14-17
"What does it profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith save him? If a brother or sister is naked and destitute of daily food, and one of you says to them, 'Depart in peace, be warmed and filled,' but you do not give them the things which are needed for the body, what does it profit? Thus also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead."
You literally paraphrased a verse in James (therefore scripture) and then said that this idea contradicted scripture. How can scripture contradict itself?
@@SanctusPaulus1962
Refrain from quoting James until you understand it… you’re welcome.
@@SanctusPaulus1962
How do you quote James 2:14-17, and still get it wrong? You see a contradiction because you don’t understand James 2. Nothing I said contradicts James 2, and “works are evidence/proof of faith” is nowhere near what James 2 is talking about, nor is it implied or inferred whatsoever. Do you even know what the word “dead” means in the Greek? Clearly not. Start there, then come talk to me.
@@Nighhhts "You're not educated enough to understand it" is not a valid argument. I'd love to hear your protestant mental gymnastics of how that verse in James apparently does not actually mean what it clearly says... enlighten me.
Is that castlevania 4 in the background?
Yes lmao
Is Mark 14:51-52 at the top of the iceberg?
Jesus says he is the great I am in John 13:19 "I am telling you this now so you believe that I am who I am." And Matthew 12:8, Mark 2:28, and Luke 6:5 which all say plainly "For the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath." When I see Jesus' great I am and his very obvious deity claims ignored it really strikes a nerve. Hopefully you can share Jesus' more rare but still extremely obvious deistic claims in verses that guys like Cliffe Knechtle will ignore. PLEASE SHARE THESE
lLucifer, a.k.a. Satan was a seraphim, not an archangel.
The water trinity thing is a Heresy and does not encapsulate the trinity.
Angelology and or Demonology next 👀
6:12 water isn’t a trinity. Plasma is also a form. Ionised gass. There goes the religion…
The water explanation of the trinity is a heresy called modalism.
Water can exist in three forms, but not at the same time. This implies that God exists in different modes at different times. In fact, any illustration of the Trinity falls short and is heresy. The correct explanation is that God exists as one essence in three persons, separate and unique yet fully combined. The term is perichoresis. The safest way to think about the Trinity is that it is a relationship we can never truly understand, but we can truly know.
Can’t understand it or know it. If you disagree it’s heresy. How convenient!!
All of tarses who became Paul should never have been considered an apostle. He never met Jesus, he wasn't his follower. He was one who persecuted early Christians. I believe he had heat stroke or suffered a stroke on the road to Damascus and that he just tried to cash in on the new wave of popularity with the Christian religion, and he pretended to convert to stay in power because under Judaism, he was a pharisee.
Also, Jesus probably was born in March because it was at the time of the census, which puts it around the time that he was also crucified.
He probably wasn't born in what we call year one, but probably 4 years before that.
Christians were being persecuted in the Roman Empire at that time. It would make no sense whatsoever for Paul to have converted to Christianity in order to gain any power. He already had power as a Pharisee. Why would be fake convert to Christianity and then die by the hands of the Romans while defending Christianity to his last breath? People don't willingly die for things they don't believe in.
I first heard about that Ethopian chapel that housed the ark from the show Ancient Aliens
As a Jehovah’s Witness I can say that we do not believe anything close to Jesus being related to satan other then being a type of angle god created and we believe that Jesus is gods first creation, his first angel who was with god as he created everything. We don’t believe in the trinity (that word has never been mentioned in the bible) and jehovahs name is the original translation of gods name (Yahweh) in to English and it is said in the bible to use and say his name. At some point Yahweh was replaced with “the lord” and “god” as humans saw his name as too holy or summin.
Concerning Adam and Eve having belly buttons or not:
While on the surface it does seem like a pretty nonsensical and just fun thought experiment, there is an interpretation of Genesis 1-11 that states when the Bible says God “made” the world in the seven days it is actually an account of God making “order” of the world out of chaos, and Adam and Eve being drawn from out of the chaos and into the garden of eden, foreshadowing the notion of God’s election of people, and them being the first “set aside” as God’s chosen people. This is not in contradiction to later in the Bible where it is explicitly stated that all things come from God and by Him all things were made, rather it is a different interpretation of the creation account and fall narrative. InspiringPhilosophy has a great video lecture series on this. And it amounts to the idea that yeah, Adam and Eve might have had belly buttons 🤷♂️ and whether or not they did might have larger implications about what we know and widely accept as the creation story. Which doesn’t do much to affect sanctification or justification, just is a fun thought experiment, with a little more depth
How are these icebergs, I knew a lot of them by just growing up and not going into a rabbit hole