Good info Billy! Personally I treat these guidelines more as suggestions than requirements. As long as you fly fairly safely and don't harass anyone with your drone then you'll be fine.
Excellent video because you were concerned about getting as much information out there in a quick amount of time without rambling, that’s very appreciated, I watch a lot of videos and some people just don’t know how to do it correctly, so thank you for that
If you flying a drone for recreational purpose only or just filming yourself and do not advertise/monetising it then you don't have to have the part 107 license. But if you do monetising it or you filming yourself with pepsi shirt then you have to take the part 107. Becouse i heard some "rumors" about FAA want to make some money out of it.
I've been on google and UA-cam looking for a answer. Maybe someone can help on here. What if I dont want to upload on youtube but instead Facebook and Instagram just to share my video for family and friends to see? Meaning I'm not interested in making money.
bruce don phone is optional in case you lose it somewhere. The FAA number must be either visible or easily accessible. So in the battery tray is okay so long as you dont need a screwdriver. You can use sticker or paint or whatever so long as its legible and can survive regular wear and tear
Billy, Is your interpretation of the FAA rules 100% correct? I mean, regarding the visual line of sight statement, you say that you have to be able to see the drone at all times. If so, then why is the verbage "line of sight" used at all? To me, "line of sight" means that you can see where the drone should be because there are no obstacles between you and the drone (such as a mountain, trees, or a building). In other words, the line would be from your eyeballs to the drone. So what if the drone is a half mile away or a mile away and still in my visual line of sight but not actually see it because it is too far away? Do you understand my point? When "line of sight" is used and not "in visual sight at all times", then I think this rule is open to interpretation.
Michael Wallitis it really is, but I'd err on side of caution and slow my roll when I get out that far. Other work around for maintaining line of sight is by having 1 or more Visual Observers on your crew, so long as at least one Observer has line of sight and you have reliable comms, the pilot has 'line of sight', so you can daisy chain VOs if youcre operating over a large distance.
@Michael Wallitis, I've been wondering a bit about this, as I've got time as a pilot years ago and recently became interested in drones. If I remember correctly, 'line-of-sight' had mostly to do with radio waves and their propagation. Low kHz (NDB, AM, etc.) are low frequency/long amplitude, can propagate between ground and ionosphere, and are able to "bend" around obstacles. Medium wave, like VOR and VHF, fall within the mHz range, have a stronger line of sight but are still able to bend somewhat around obstacles and the curvature of the earth. Higher frequencies used in the now-disappearing VOR/DME navigation radios, is very line-of-sight oriented. Those compass roses you see on some airfields in the sectional maps are where a VOR station is located; the beacon rotated 360°, you used one frequency to obtain that signal, and another to receive the DME (Distance Measuring Equipment) signal. Heading and distance to airfield were achieved this way. It's signal could be interrupted by terrain or other obstacles. The term was very common when I was going through ground school and initial training, always referred to radio and an imaginary line drawn from your aircraft to the signal source. When on cross country flights, you always needed to check the trig on mountain ranges to be certain of your needed altitude to obtain the signals clearly. Obviously, you could be many miles away from the source, not able to physically see it. What the FAA has in mind, drone-wise, I don't know, I guess add it to the list of presently vague terminology. If it's anything like FCMSR and DOT rules, we're in for a bumpy ride.
@@billykyle thank you for your reply! Just didn't know if I should except the dji message that said they won't be responsible for the aircraft after you accept altering the height requirements did you except that?
Colby If you’re flying for fun (recreationally) you don’t have to stay under 400 feet. If you’re flying under Part 107 you would have to stay under 400 feet even if you’re going over a mountain. It’s 400 feet “above ground level” not above sea level. So if the ground rises (like a mountain) then you can fly higher as long as you are within 400 feet from ground.
Hi Billy, I'm from Brazil and in April I will be in Orlando with my family, so in order to avoid any complication with the US authorities I've tried to register my mavic air on the FAA. However I'm not able to pay $5 because the zip code of my credit card billing failed validation. Do you know if only US citizen can register drones on the FAA or if I have an US credit card would work?
This is a very gray area. When I look at my state's state park laws they specifically say that you can not take off or land in the state park areas. I believe someone could actually take off outside the boundaries and fly over the state park. As long as they are not flying over people or dwellings, I think they may be okay. If you lose the drone and it lands in the park you are in trouble. At any rate, be prepared to get a lawyer if they come calling for you.
Hi People Marty here from Downunder In Aussie We can not fly at night. Can you guys legal ? Also we must stay 30m away from People, houses & buildings. Cars etc Same for USA ?
No night flights, we're allowed to fly in civil twilight with lights on. Cant fly over people and gotta keep safely away horizontally. We can fly near houses and buidlings, but people are allowed to complain at us, gotta be careful to not look like we're invading privacy even when we're just flying. We have to keep very far from buildings with wires. If we wreck anything its our ass
Roy Cornelis so long as other people are under roof or some kind of cover its okay, you are still liable for any damages you cause if somehow a car or power line gets hit. Good altitude is key, you're allowed an extra 400 ft clearance over buildings and you shouldn't/cant be near wires anyway without waivers or somesuch. Dont quote me though in case i missed something.
Good update on the rules Billy. I want everyone to fly safe and responsible. We don't need any cowboys ruining it for the rest of us. Are you going to DJI event tomorrow? Do you know if there live streaming it?
Billy.. a couple questions: AirMap app shows no fly zones around airports, stating you have to notify the controlling agency when flying as a hobbyist, but removes that requirement when flying as a 107 pilot. The B4UFly app does not make such distinctions.. also, I was at an event recently where a pilot was filming for the event. I talked to him briefly and he stated that he had his 107 certification as well as 333 exemptions. He was flying directly over a very large dense crowd of people (think outdoor concert). How was he able to legally do this?!
AV8R Tom if you fly 107 you have basically filed a flight plan when getting approved. Depending on requirements you may or may not have to call the tower. 333 was given out several years ago and is great to have but from what I understand is it is not available anymore and I think they will eventually expire. If you are an airplane pilot it’s a simple online test for your part 107 license.
AV8R--He can't fly directly over people without a waiver and as Billy stated only CNN has ever received such a waiver. In other words, the guy was flying illegally.
My question is, who is the advocate for the hobbyist? I'm new to flying, but I'm seriously thinking about giving it up because of all the restrictions. I believe that blanket restrictions are totally unfair. For example, here in Alabama I can't fly in State Parks. Ever. Wouldn't it be better to restrict specific activities that could harm, or annoy? Or even have designated flying days (or areas) so that people could avoid the parks on those days if they choose to. It's very discouraging. So much so that I may give it up. I don't want to, but what's the use with so many restrictions?
Say, I have question are there law's that protect us, (The Pilot) such as the angry guy in the park, people who shoot down are drones and throw things at it, false allegations like lady down the street that say we could spy on her while she's pool side, things like that?
Tank 62 a case has gone to court and they ruled 68’ is ok above private property. If your drone is registered through the FAA then it should be a federal offense if someone causes damage to it. If you are flying over someone you will both be getting in trouble ( can’t fly over people ) but if the run up to it to cause damage that is different.
Stan Bates Stan, thanks for your answer. And is anything been done to inform the public of are rights so we all can live peace because some people feel no matter what that Drone flying is up to know good.
Billy ... Why was my previous comment deleted from this video? Please dont censor unless bad language was used which it wasn't. Allow the freedom of speech. Thank you.
Because I think it is more of a behavior thing then a height thing. What I mean, is that there is a incredibly huge amount of air space up in the sky, it would take intent, luck and more luck to try and run into an airplane, especially in rural and non-airport areas. I know for a fact that some local airplanes fly below their 500ft at times... I dunno, I don't think there should be a limit in altitude as long as you are flying responsibly. I know the government has to have 'concrete' rules, but if one flies above 400ft at all and there is a nearby accident, I could see that just because you were above 400ft, you could be liable when drones keep logs and such. I dunno. I am ranting now...
Trubyd44 If you build your own drones or fly racing drones there are no logs or anything of that sort. Its really mostly just DJI and a few other photography drone companies that does that stuff. of course youd still be liable, itd just be unlikely youd ever get caught as long as you were responsible about it. personally i think 400ft is fine, Especially since its 400ft above structures, hills etc. That means you could fly 400ft over the top of a building (depending on the building) or even 400ft over the top of a hill or mountain. There are ways to stay under 400ft and still have fun with it. Especially if you are flying acro mode!!!
N'th DEGREE AERIAL PERSPECTIVES One of the challenges our society faces is: what is the interpretation of the word “responsibly”? Different people might interpret the meaning of that word as it applies to them and what they want to do, differently. Broad statements can leave much room for varying interpretations. Are you against the need to get a 107 license in order to use your drones for commercial purposes? Are you against any of the rules for hobbyist drone flying? America has ALWAYS struggled with seeking the line of demarcation re: what is retained as an individual’s right vs. a right to be restricted for the betterment (or perceived betterment) of society. George Washington described this struggle in a letter dated September 17, 1787: “It is obviously impracticable in the federal government of these states, to secure all rights of independent sovereignty to each, and yet provide for the interest and safety of all: Individuals entering into society, must give up a share of liberty to preserve the rest. The magnitude of the sacrifice must depend as well on situation and circumstance, as on the object to be obtained. It is at all times difficult to draw with precision the line between those rights which must be surrendered, and those which may be reserved;” avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/translet.asp
If you really want to know the FAA rules you should look them up yourself and not believe the first UA-cam video you watch. I have my Part 107 license. This information is mixing commercial rules with recreational rules. Do your research!!
Good information but not complete. I know it was meant to be quick and basic. I have my Part 107 certification and fly by the rules. I have also received certificate of waiver to fly in controlled airspace. The problem is, 90% or more of the people who have drones do not follow any or even know about the FAA rules and regulations. My neighbor purchased a DJI Mavic and I saw him flying it one night. Not only was he in a Class E restricted airspace, he was also flying it within 1,000 ft of a hospital with a helipad and current traffic and two hours after sunset. Plus he was drinking his third beer while he was flying. For a month before, I told him all of the FAA rules and regulations, so he was very aware of them. He chose to ignore them because he thought they were ridiculous. This is exactly why the FAA has made blanket rule and will enforce them. The FAA has also encouraged local law enforcement to cite persons who disobey the rules. Law enforcement can only cite you, not take your drone or arrest you. However, if they cite you, the FAA will follow up with a review. If you are found to be in violation, there is a fairly steep fine. Drone safe!
There are plenty of minuscule details left out, but as you stated I was trying to quickly lay out the general rules. The longer you fly the more rules you will pick up on
Billy, please don't take offense to my "not complete" comment. I love your channel! I have watched almost all of your post. You are very informative and helpful! I have just met a few amateur/hobby pilots that either disregard or blatantly ignore the rules and safe flying practices. They don't seem to have any common sense. Also, I may be wrong but I don't believe the 400 ft about a structure applies to amateur/hobby pilots. I have also talked to a few pilots that say, if you don't have your 107 or a 333, the chance of calling the tower and being approved to fly in controlled airspace are slim to non. Please keep posting! Thank you so much for your channel. Fly safe!
andrew scala Are you sure about that? ive heard the number is basically just to identify the pilot, not the drone itself. Its supposedly just 1 number for all of your drones. I've heard that dozens of times. You are the only person I've heard say otherwise.
Soon any uas will be required to pay for a on board transponder.been in this hobby for 41 years and everything was fine and fun until these redicuous and irresponsible people starting flying these stupid drones.now it has ruined the hobby for all ama members.....I guess I will be having a massive, massive rc estate sale soon!!!!!!!!!... yeh this sucks!!!!!!!!
You need to get facts straight if you want to put out a video “of rules and regulations you MUST follow”. The 400 foot rule applies only to 107 cert fliers. Same goes for flying over groups of people. Although it makes good sense in most cases to fly that way, the public law you cite in Sec. 336 as well as the FAA interpretation of the law are misrepresented in this VLOG. Fly safe at all times people, but if you want to know the actual rules, don’t listen to Kyle.
1. My name is Billy. 2. Flying above 400 feet is often unnecessary and irresponsible. Even though you might not NEED to follow the 400 foot rule, it should still be followed for the safety of you and those around you.
Billy Kyle I said that flying safe is paramount. But making up rules to suit your personal sense of safety is misrepresenting the facts. If you don’t know the difference, say nothing. I’ve been flying for over thirty years, so if you don’t know the facts, you confuse others and lose any credibility with those who actually know.
This video was geared towards both Part 107 holders and those who fly under Section 336. Like the title states, it was explained “as fast as possible” for those who are new to flying. I didn’t go into as much depth as usual so I could maintain the short video length.
You lose credibility when after stating something that is clearly inaccurate you don't just admit it and say sorry. I always liked your videos because you seemed so knowledgeable about the drones unlike many of the other drone video personalities.
Hobbyists are subject to the rules too. You can fly over 400ft as much as a 107 pilot can, the liscense proves you know you shouldn't without a waiver and its your ass if you get caught or if you cause an accident from a freak flyaway or whatever. You cannot hover over a populated area unless the people are part of your shoot. Clearing over a crowd is relatively accepted as safe though. The rules are being tweaked constantly and everyone is subject, license holders just get to make money for flying. Billy aint said nothing wrong, even if it's abbreviated
#SayNoToDrinkingAndDroning
This was very informative. Thanks for posting.
This was much needed Billy. Thank you for putting this together !
Good job Billy.... this is now posted on the SWARM (SAR) website page.....Again thanks...
Thanks Billy. I'm passing this on to a new user. It answers a lot of questions in a short time. Great delivery.
Good info Billy! Personally I treat these guidelines more as suggestions than requirements. As long as you fly fairly safely and don't harass anyone with your drone then you'll be fine.
Complete and succinct - very good vid. Thanks!
Hey Bill any suggestions of where to go to study for the part 107 certification?
Excellent video because you were concerned about getting as much information out there in a quick amount of time without rambling, that’s very appreciated, I watch a lot of videos and some people just don’t know how to do it correctly, so thank you for that
Hi Billy, At your High School or at a National park could you take off on a road and fly over the school or park??? Just wondering.
THANKS BROTHER BILLY NICE INFO ☺
Thanks Billy
Drone buddy is a great app as well!
Good stuff quick and to the point Billy! Are you a part 107 btw?
Thanks for the rules god bless
If you flying a drone for recreational purpose only or just filming yourself and do not advertise/monetising it then you don't have to have the part 107 license. But if you do monetising it or you filming yourself with pepsi shirt then you have to take the part 107. Becouse i heard some "rumors" about FAA want to make some money out of it.
I've been on google and UA-cam looking for a answer. Maybe someone can help on here. What if I dont want to upload on youtube but instead Facebook and Instagram just to share my video for family and friends to see? Meaning I'm not interested in making money.
How and where is the reg # to be placed on drone?do you also have to have a phone # on it somewhere?
bruce don phone is optional in case you lose it somewhere. The FAA number must be either visible or easily accessible. So in the battery tray is okay so long as you dont need a screwdriver. You can use sticker or paint or whatever so long as its legible and can survive regular wear and tear
thanks for making it quick!
Simple direct and accurate very well done sir
Can you fly over the parks if you do not take off inside the park?
Yeah. Just can’t take off, land, or operate from the park.
Billy, Is your interpretation of the FAA rules 100% correct? I mean, regarding the visual line of sight statement, you say that you have to be able to see the drone at all times. If so, then why is the verbage "line of sight" used at all? To me, "line of sight" means that you can see where the drone should be because there are no obstacles between you and the drone (such as a mountain, trees, or a building). In other words, the line would be from your eyeballs to the drone. So what if the drone is a half mile away or a mile away and still in my visual line of sight but not actually see it because it is too far away? Do you understand my point? When "line of sight" is used and not "in visual sight at all times", then I think this rule is open to interpretation.
Michael Wallitis it really is, but I'd err on side of caution and slow my roll when I get out that far. Other work around for maintaining line of sight is by having 1 or more Visual Observers on your crew, so long as at least one Observer has line of sight and you have reliable comms, the pilot has 'line of sight', so you can daisy chain VOs if youcre operating over a large distance.
@Michael Wallitis, I've been wondering a bit about this, as I've got time as a pilot years ago and recently became interested in drones. If I remember correctly, 'line-of-sight' had mostly to do with radio waves and their propagation. Low kHz (NDB, AM, etc.) are low frequency/long amplitude, can propagate between ground and ionosphere, and are able to "bend" around obstacles. Medium wave, like VOR and VHF, fall within the mHz range, have a stronger line of sight but are still able to bend somewhat around obstacles and the curvature of the earth. Higher frequencies used in the now-disappearing VOR/DME navigation radios, is very line-of-sight oriented. Those compass roses you see on some airfields in the sectional maps are where a VOR station is located; the beacon rotated 360°, you used one frequency to obtain that signal, and another to receive the DME (Distance Measuring Equipment) signal. Heading and distance to airfield were achieved this way. It's signal could be interrupted by terrain or other obstacles.
The term was very common when I was going through ground school and initial training, always referred to radio and an imaginary line drawn from your aircraft to the signal source. When on cross country flights, you always needed to check the trig on mountain ranges to be certain of your needed altitude to obtain the signals clearly. Obviously, you could be many miles away from the source, not able to physically see it. What the FAA has in mind, drone-wise, I don't know, I guess add it to the list of presently vague terminology. If it's anything like FCMSR and DOT rules, we're in for a bumpy ride.
You can keep a line of sight on the drone if your drone has a third person camera.
Troll logic.
Good job Billy thanks for all the info.
Does anyone know if you can take pictures and video of land marks without a part 107?
Walter Miles only for Hobby for free and if the landmark isnt in a no fly zone. Compensation for work is what you need the 107 for.
When you register the drone do you need to be a certain age
13 I believe to have a drone registered, 16 to take the part107 test
Can you fly above the 400 foot max if going up a mountain?
Yes
@@billykyle thank you for your reply! Just didn't know if I should except the dji message that said they won't be responsible for the aircraft after you accept altering the height requirements did you except that?
Colby If you’re flying for fun (recreationally) you don’t have to stay under 400 feet. If you’re flying under Part 107 you would have to stay under 400 feet even if you’re going over a mountain. It’s 400 feet “above ground level” not above sea level. So if the ground rises (like a mountain) then you can fly higher as long as you are within 400 feet from ground.
@@subtropicalsteph thank you very much.
do you have a 107 licence ?
Do I have to register a spark? Some people say yes and some people say no
Yes you do
Thank you for the very informative video update!
Great job billy, Go Eagles 🦅
Go birds! Big day today
So helpful! Thanks a lot man!!
don't have an opinion ....ok ...*cough* bull(BLEEP)!! LOL ...thank you WJK !!
Hi Billy, I'm from Brazil and in April I will be in Orlando with my family, so in order to avoid any complication with the US authorities I've tried to register my mavic air on the FAA. However I'm not able to pay $5 because the zip code of my credit card billing failed validation. Do you know if only US citizen can register drones on the FAA or if I have an US credit card would work?
Thanks Billy.
You cannot take off from Parks & schools & things of that nature but you can fly through and above them . They do not own the air.
As of now I don't believe there is any restrictions to fly on the premise of a public school. It's up to the advisors to decide this.
Land of the free home of the brave....
This is a very gray area. When I look at my state's state park laws they specifically say that you can not take off or land in the state park areas. I believe someone could actually take off outside the boundaries and fly over the state park. As long as they are not flying over people or dwellings, I think they may be okay. If you lose the drone and it lands in the park you are in trouble. At any rate, be prepared to get a lawyer if they come calling for you.
Schools are where I fly. No one has ever said anything, ever.
I shall continue.
Drones are *ARMS* and thus covered by the second ammendment. What next, registering for a permit to fire cannons? This is America!
Hi People
Marty here from Downunder
In Aussie
We can not fly at night. Can you guys legal ?
Also we must stay 30m away from
People, houses & buildings. Cars etc
Same for USA ?
No night flights, we're allowed to fly in civil twilight with lights on. Cant fly over people and gotta keep safely away horizontally. We can fly near houses and buidlings, but people are allowed to complain at us, gotta be careful to not look like we're invading privacy even when we're just flying. We have to keep very far from buildings with wires. If we wreck anything its our ass
Is it ok to cross road with traffic if you need to go from point A to B at a good altitude?
Roy Cornelis so long as other people are under roof or some kind of cover its okay, you are still liable for any damages you cause if somehow a car or power line gets hit. Good altitude is key, you're allowed an extra 400 ft clearance over buildings and you shouldn't/cant be near wires anyway without waivers or somesuch. Dont quote me though in case i missed something.
Thanks bruh!!
Can you register with the FAA before you get a drone so you can fly as soon as you get it?
Yea
You need the serial number of your drone though.
Good update on the rules Billy. I want everyone to fly safe and responsible. We don't need any cowboys ruining it for the rest of us. Are you going to DJI event tomorrow? Do you know if there live streaming it?
Billy.. a couple questions: AirMap app shows no fly zones around airports, stating you have to notify the controlling agency when flying as a hobbyist, but removes that requirement when flying as a 107 pilot. The B4UFly app does not make such distinctions.. also, I was at an event recently where a pilot was filming for the event. I talked to him briefly and he stated that he had his 107 certification as well as 333 exemptions. He was flying directly over a very large dense crowd of people (think outdoor concert). How was he able to legally do this?!
AV8R Tom if you fly 107 you have basically filed a flight plan when getting approved. Depending on requirements you may or may not have to call the tower. 333 was given out several years ago and is great to have but from what I understand is it is not available anymore and I think they will eventually expire. If you are an airplane pilot it’s a simple online test for your part 107 license.
AV8R--He can't fly directly over people without a waiver and as Billy stated only CNN has ever received such a waiver. In other words, the guy was flying illegally.
My question is, who is the advocate for the hobbyist? I'm new to flying, but I'm seriously thinking about giving it up because of all the restrictions. I believe that blanket restrictions are totally unfair. For example, here in Alabama I can't fly in State Parks. Ever. Wouldn't it be better to restrict specific activities that could harm, or annoy? Or even have designated flying days (or areas) so that people could avoid the parks on those days if they choose to. It's very discouraging. So much so that I may give it up. I don't want to, but what's the use with so many restrictions?
Thanks. What was the name of the app you referenced? Can’t find it in the App Store
“B4UFly”
Good info! I’m not seeing an app in the App Store called “before you fly” could it be called something else by chance?
It’s titled weird. “B4ufly”
Eric Tobias You can all try UAV Forecast, app
Say, I have question are there law's that protect us, (The Pilot) such as the angry guy in the park, people who shoot down are drones and throw things at it, false allegations like lady down the street that say we could spy on her while she's pool side, things like that?
Tank 62 a case has gone to court and they ruled 68’ is ok above private property. If your drone is registered through the FAA then it should be a federal offense if someone causes damage to it. If you are flying over someone you will both be getting in trouble ( can’t fly over people ) but if the run up to it to cause damage that is different.
Stan Bates Stan, thanks for your answer. And is anything been done to inform the public of are rights so we all can live peace because some people feel no matter what that Drone flying is up to know good.
The FAA's app B4UFLY has awful reviews in Play Store.
Billy ... Why was my previous comment deleted from this video? Please dont censor unless bad language was used which it wasn't. Allow the freedom of speech. Thank you.
400ft ceiling is stupid IMHO
Why do you say that?
Because I think it is more of a behavior thing then a height thing. What I mean, is that there is a incredibly huge amount of air space up in the sky, it would take intent, luck and more luck to try and run into an airplane, especially in rural and non-airport areas. I know for a fact that some local airplanes fly below their 500ft at times... I dunno, I don't think there should be a limit in altitude as long as you are flying responsibly. I know the government has to have 'concrete' rules, but if one flies above 400ft at all and there is a nearby accident, I could see that just because you were above 400ft, you could be liable when drones keep logs and such. I dunno. I am ranting now...
Trubyd44 If you build your own drones or fly racing drones there are no logs or anything of that sort. Its really mostly just DJI and a few other photography drone companies that does that stuff. of course youd still be liable, itd just be unlikely youd ever get caught as long as you were responsible about it. personally i think 400ft is fine, Especially since its 400ft above structures, hills etc. That means you could fly 400ft over the top of a building (depending on the building) or even 400ft over the top of a hill or mountain. There are ways to stay under 400ft and still have fun with it. Especially if you are flying acro mode!!!
Restrictive? Lol.. Flying in USA is paradise. U guys ever try flying in Canada? They take One more step in Canada and u won't be able to fly at all.
Free men don't need government permission to responsibly earn a living. (Mho)
N'th DEGREE AERIAL PERSPECTIVES One of the challenges our society faces is: what is the interpretation of the word “responsibly”? Different people might interpret the meaning of that word as it applies to them and what they want to do, differently.
Broad statements can leave much room for varying interpretations.
Are you against the need to get a 107 license in order to use your drones for commercial purposes?
Are you against any of the rules for hobbyist drone flying?
America has ALWAYS struggled with seeking the line of demarcation re: what is retained as an individual’s right vs. a right to be restricted for the betterment (or perceived betterment) of society.
George Washington described this struggle in a letter dated September 17, 1787:
“It is obviously impracticable in the federal government of these states, to secure all rights of independent sovereignty to each, and yet provide for the interest and safety of all: Individuals entering into society, must give up a share of liberty to preserve the rest. The magnitude of the sacrifice must depend as well on situation and circumstance, as on the object to be obtained. It is at all times difficult to draw with precision the line between those rights which must be surrendered, and those which may be reserved;”
avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/translet.asp
I found the B4UFLY really really slooow.
not cool blackout!
0:44 part of the video
If you really want to know the FAA rules you should look them up yourself and not believe the first UA-cam video you watch. I have my Part 107 license. This information is mixing commercial rules with recreational rules. Do your research!!
Steph do you need a 107 to fly like for say in my backyard for fun?
Ynwa Lfc No, you do not need your part 107 to fly for fun.
Good information but not complete. I know it was meant to be quick and basic. I have my Part 107 certification and fly by the rules. I have also received certificate of waiver to fly in controlled airspace. The problem is, 90% or more of the people who have drones do not follow any or even know about the FAA rules and regulations. My neighbor purchased a DJI Mavic and I saw him flying it one night. Not only was he in a Class E restricted airspace, he was also flying it within 1,000 ft of a hospital with a helipad and current traffic and two hours after sunset. Plus he was drinking his third beer while he was flying. For a month before, I told him all of the FAA rules and regulations, so he was very aware of them. He chose to ignore them because he thought they were ridiculous. This is exactly why the FAA has made blanket rule and will enforce them. The FAA has also encouraged local law enforcement to cite persons who disobey the rules. Law enforcement can only cite you, not take your drone or arrest you. However, if they cite you, the FAA will follow up with a review. If you are found to be in violation, there is a fairly steep fine. Drone safe!
There are plenty of minuscule details left out, but as you stated I was trying to quickly lay out the general rules. The longer you fly the more rules you will pick up on
Billy, please don't take offense to my "not complete" comment. I love your channel! I have watched almost all of your post. You are very informative and helpful! I have just met a few amateur/hobby pilots that either disregard or blatantly ignore the rules and safe flying practices. They don't seem to have any common sense. Also, I may be wrong but I don't believe the 400 ft about a structure applies to amateur/hobby pilots. I have also talked to a few pilots that say, if you don't have your 107 or a 333, the chance of calling the tower and being approved to fly in controlled airspace are slim to non. Please keep posting! Thank you so much for your channel. Fly safe!
No offense taken! Thank you for the comment Matt. These rules right now are honestly a mess. Making sense of them can be hard for anyone.
I flown my rc turbine F15 up 20 feet going 100mph no issue and no registration needed.
Flight Simulator 🤣
Different serial #s require separate registrations at $5 each... one number is not for all drones you own!!!
andrew scala Are you sure about that? ive heard the number is basically just to identify the pilot, not the drone itself. Its supposedly just 1 number for all of your drones. I've heard that dozens of times. You are the only person I've heard say otherwise.
One # is good for all your drones
You should add a link to the B4UFLY app. Searching for "Before you fly" gets you nothing. ;-)
Soon any uas will be required to pay for a on board transponder.been in this hobby for 41 years and everything was fine and fun until these redicuous and irresponsible people starting flying these stupid drones.now it has ruined the hobby for all ama members.....I guess I will be having a massive, massive rc estate sale soon!!!!!!!!!... yeh this sucks!!!!!!!!
Another UA-cam video mixing hobbyist and commercial rules.
Shame.
You need to get facts straight if you want to put out a video “of rules and regulations you MUST follow”. The 400 foot rule applies only to 107 cert fliers. Same goes for flying over groups of people. Although it makes good sense in most cases to fly that way, the public law you cite in Sec. 336 as well as the FAA interpretation of the law are misrepresented in this VLOG. Fly safe at all times people, but if you want to know the actual rules, don’t listen to Kyle.
1. My name is Billy.
2. Flying above 400 feet is often unnecessary and irresponsible. Even though you might not NEED to follow the 400 foot rule, it should still be followed for the safety of you and those around you.
Billy Kyle I said that flying safe is paramount. But making up rules to suit your personal sense of safety is misrepresenting the facts. If you don’t know the difference, say nothing. I’ve been flying for over thirty years, so if you don’t know the facts, you confuse others and lose any credibility with those who actually know.
This video was geared towards both Part 107 holders and those who fly under Section 336. Like the title states, it was explained “as fast as possible” for those who are new to flying. I didn’t go into as much depth as usual so I could maintain the short video length.
You lose credibility when after stating something that is clearly inaccurate you don't just admit it and say sorry. I always liked your videos because you seemed so knowledgeable about the drones unlike many of the other drone video personalities.
Hobbyists are subject to the rules too. You can fly over 400ft as much as a 107 pilot can, the liscense proves you know you shouldn't without a waiver and its your ass if you get caught or if you cause an accident from a freak flyaway or whatever. You cannot hover over a populated area unless the people are part of your shoot. Clearing over a crowd is relatively accepted as safe though. The rules are being tweaked constantly and everyone is subject, license holders just get to make money for flying. Billy aint said nothing wrong, even if it's abbreviated
Thanks Billy