thanks u maaateee 🥲🥲🥲🥲i'm havin class dedicated to performatives tomorrow(2day)!!! your video really helps me!!! Vika and Alexandra, I hope u're seein this comment 🤓🤓🤓😎🥸🤫
Wow. It took me 15 minutes to be prepared for my 15 mark question. I love this! Now I'll read the full book because I can listen to you side by side and then finally make some sense out of it. Thank youuuuu!!!
I had to read the first two lectures of his book and do an essay about it but when I didn't understand what J. L. Austin was trying to explain. I tried to read the English version because I noticed some parts weren't accurately translated, but (again) I didn't feel as I really understand. Now, I just saw this video and I get better his ideas. I am very thankful! The explanation wasn't difficult to follow and I enjoyed the examples haha. Keep doing good videos(:
Thank you for this. I had big issues with understanding the text while I was reading it but this made it much more understandable for me who doesn't have english as mother tongue.
i guess im asking randomly but does anybody know a method to get back into an Instagram account..? I stupidly lost the login password. I would appreciate any tricks you can offer me
Trying to use this in criticizing speech act theory in Securitisation, very interesting stuff. Thanks for the upload, pretty easy to understand and fun to think about.
Oh, pardon me, I meant Securitisation in the political realm. The Copenhagen theorists predicate their Securitisation on language theory, I think it's interesting to attempt to deconstruct their claims and try to understand how they intended to utilize the Speech Act in their discourse of analysis.
@@NikitsuLaw Well, that sounds fascinating too. Looks like one service you could provide is to update the Wikipedia entry, which is rather vague on the topic: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copenhagen_School_(international_relations)#Securitization
Its so interesting Austin's work. Its the type of text perfect to subvert by Lacan`s thought. Austin totally misses the thing by not knowing anything about the unconcious. Saying it in other words, all the acts of speaking are performatives, because at least when we speak we are implying that someone will listen (either its there in reality or not). Great video Ill continue watching!
@@thenatureofwriting9222 It is so nice of you to answer, thanks! I just need to figure out a way to achieve a similar feel to my lectures/ presentations with my existing set-up, because I really feel students will respond better. My laptop is not a surface one and I think those apps are probably iOS, I will check them out and have a think on it.
Hi - a question about the production rather than the content - can you tell me what software you used to prepare the presentation? I love the way you hand-annotated the slides - something I'd like to use in my own teaching.
Since I get this question more often, here’s a quick tutorial on how I create my videos. I use basically the same approach as the folks at the Khan Academy, which you may be familiar with. These are the tools I use: 1. My laptop is a Microsoft Surface, which comes with an excellent stylus. 2. I use a program called Camtasia to record what's on my screen. For the drawing program I use Sketchbook (sketchbook.com/) 3. My mic is an AKG (I think it's the P420). I used to have a Yeti microphone, which was okay too. 4. I use an arm stand and pop filter to reduce extra noises and vibration. 5. The interface between the mic and the laptop is a FocusRite Scarlett Solo. 6. You'll need some kind of headset to check the sound quality after you record. Nothing fancy required. However, you do have to make sure that in Camtasia you change the sound quality from mono to stereo so that the sound comes through both ears. 7. You need a very quiet room, esp. if your mic is a good one and picks up every last little sound. There are many other ways to make educational videos, so best of luck if you're heading down this road! (I've copied and pasted this from the community tab section of my channel)
The problem with the third (nonsense) statement is that fundamentally a piano isnt a thing that exists. By applying values to the piano one can sensibly say that this thing is more piano like, but to suppose a piano is something that can have other values or attributes applied to it is impossible. It is a thing that is a piano, and a thing can not directly adopt the organic qualities so commonly attributed by humans to other human actions (ex: the piano is thirsty, the paper flew away, the wheel is racing down the street). These are human effectors, a human cause, a human choice to influence the perception of something. Those who study language forget often that they themselves are the ones who invented language. This is just another case of amnesia, the only sensible application of such an idea is as rhetoric or comedy. It simply isn't factual or even probable that a "piano has been drinking heavily" and shouldn't be interpreted as such. What a non-problem. 👏👏👏👏👏 FURTHERMORE "piano" exists at the level of experience and association. I grew up in a house where a TV remote was called a whipper. Having it be a whipper does not make it any less a tv remote, but if I were at a friends house and ask them to pass me the whipper, in their experience governed by their association of what a whipper is, they would be unable to find relative coordinates regarding "whipper", to which they would present confusion or befuddlement. They could be taught this thing is a whipper, and then they could form a rational association between whipper and tv remote, but the expectation of this as intuitive is entirely cultural. So the next time i ask them to pass me the whipper, they can make a decision regarding my request.
thanks u maaateee 🥲🥲🥲🥲i'm havin class dedicated to performatives tomorrow(2day)!!! your video really helps me!!! Vika and Alexandra, I hope u're seein this comment 🤓🤓🤓😎🥸🤫
Fr dude, we owe you our lives🥲🙏 Blessings be upon you
Wow. It took me 15 minutes to be prepared for my 15 mark question. I love this! Now I'll read the full book because I can listen to you side by side and then finally make some sense out of it. Thank youuuuu!!!
Great to hear. Best wishes with your studies.
hey you studied at iit Kharagpur
I enjoyed the explanation, very good and clear. Thank for your work. I much appreciate it!
Thanks for your kind words!
Thank you so much for this video, I just read these two chapters and you definitely clarified it much better
Thankyou so much for the explanation and your voice is really nice and attractive.
I had to read the first two lectures of his book and do an essay about it but when I didn't understand what J. L. Austin was trying to explain. I tried to read the English version because I noticed some parts weren't accurately translated, but (again) I didn't feel as I really understand. Now, I just saw this video and I get better his ideas. I am very thankful! The explanation wasn't difficult to follow and I enjoyed the examples haha. Keep doing good videos(:
Thanks, Franz!
Thank you for this. I had big issues with understanding the text while I was reading it but this made it much more understandable for me who doesn't have english as mother tongue.
That's great to hear!
thank you from the heart for the clear explanation
You're welcome!
Hey there, thanks a lot for making this series! :) it helps me cause I'm now working on my thesis about speech act ☺
Great to hear. Best wishes with the thesis!
i guess im asking randomly but does anybody know a method to get back into an Instagram account..?
I stupidly lost the login password. I would appreciate any tricks you can offer me
Nice, very clear explanation. I used it while preparing this text for my entrance exam for philosophy. Thanx for helping!
Thanks. That sounds like a challenging exam!
Trying to use this in criticizing speech act theory in Securitisation, very interesting stuff. Thanks for the upload, pretty easy to understand and fun to think about.
Sounds like an interesting topic. I'm sure there are plenty of speech acts in the world of banking!
Oh, pardon me, I meant Securitisation in the political realm. The Copenhagen theorists predicate their Securitisation on language theory, I think it's interesting to attempt to deconstruct their claims and try to understand how they intended to utilize the Speech Act in their discourse of analysis.
@@NikitsuLaw Well, that sounds fascinating too. Looks like one service you could provide is to update the Wikipedia entry, which is rather vague on the topic: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copenhagen_School_(international_relations)#Securitization
Oh wow, this needs quite a bit of editing. I'll see what I can do there. Thanks for pointing that out. Cheers!
I've recently written an essay on the topic for my course, providing critique for the Speech Act. That isn't even mentioned in the Criticism section!
Very fine and student friendly description...thanks...
Thanks!
Your content is so touching
Its so interesting Austin's work. Its the type of text perfect to subvert by Lacan`s thought. Austin totally misses the thing by not knowing anything about the unconcious. Saying it in other words, all the acts of speaking are performatives, because at least when we speak we are implying that someone will listen (either its there in reality or not).
Great video Ill continue watching!
Great to hear you're finding interesting connections. Enjoy the other videos!
Hi, I loved the presentations. I really wanted to ask how you annotate the slides. Cheers
Thanks! I use the free app SketchBook and then record it using Camtasia (both on my Surface laptop). Hope that helps.
@@thenatureofwriting9222 It is so nice of you to answer, thanks! I just need to figure out a way to achieve a similar feel to my lectures/ presentations with my existing set-up, because I really feel students will respond better. My laptop is not a surface one and I think those apps are probably iOS, I will check them out and have a think on it.
@@ПолинаПеткова-я7о Camtasia and Sketchbook can be used on both Apple products and Microsoft products. Hope you find a good solution!
Hi - a question about the production rather than the content - can you tell me what software you used to prepare the presentation? I love the way you hand-annotated the slides - something I'd like to use in my own teaching.
Since I get this question more often, here’s a quick tutorial on how I create my videos. I use basically the same approach as the folks at the Khan Academy, which you may be familiar with. These are the tools I use:
1. My laptop is a Microsoft Surface, which comes with an excellent stylus.
2. I use a program called Camtasia to record what's on my screen. For the drawing program I use Sketchbook (sketchbook.com/)
3. My mic is an AKG (I think it's the P420). I used to have a Yeti microphone, which was okay too.
4. I use an arm stand and pop filter to reduce extra noises and vibration.
5. The interface between the mic and the laptop is a FocusRite Scarlett Solo.
6. You'll need some kind of headset to check the sound quality after you record. Nothing fancy required. However, you do have to make sure that in Camtasia you change the sound quality from mono to stereo so that the sound comes through both ears.
7. You need a very quiet room, esp. if your mic is a good one and picks up every last little sound.
There are many other ways to make educational videos, so best of luck if you're heading down this road!
(I've copied and pasted this from the community tab section of my channel)
Lovely, thanks.
You're welcome!
Is "The piano has been drinking" from the book? 'Coz it's the refrain of a Tom Waits song.
It's not in the book, so maybe it's an allusion to Tom Waits. You can decide. :)
Hi there! Thanks for the explanation, it was very useful! Btw, can you tell me which program did you use for makig the video?
Thanks in advance!
Hi Federico, I use Camtasia and Sketchbook. See the Community tab on the channel for more information!
@@thenatureofwriting9222 Thanks a lot!
You try to give the video more brightness it will be great if you do
Thanks for the feedback!
thanks!!
You're welcome!
My necktie is asleep and the carpet needs a haircut.
The problem with the third (nonsense) statement is that fundamentally a piano isnt a thing that exists. By applying values to the piano one can sensibly say that this thing is more piano like, but to suppose a piano is something that can have other values or attributes applied to it is impossible. It is a thing that is a piano, and a thing can not directly adopt the organic qualities so commonly attributed by humans to other human actions (ex: the piano is thirsty, the paper flew away, the wheel is racing down the street). These are human effectors, a human cause, a human choice to influence the perception of something. Those who study language forget often that they themselves are the ones who invented language. This is just another case of amnesia, the only sensible application of such an idea is as rhetoric or comedy. It simply isn't factual or even probable that a "piano has been drinking heavily" and shouldn't be interpreted as such. What a non-problem. 👏👏👏👏👏
FURTHERMORE "piano" exists at the level of experience and association. I grew up in a house where a TV remote was called a whipper. Having it be a whipper does not make it any less a tv remote, but if I were at a friends house and ask them to pass me the whipper, in their experience governed by their association of what a whipper is, they would be unable to find relative coordinates regarding "whipper", to which they would present confusion or befuddlement. They could be taught this thing is a whipper, and then they could form a rational association between whipper and tv remote, but the expectation of this as intuitive is entirely cultural.
So the next time i ask them to pass me the whipper, they can make a decision regarding my request.
John Langshaw Austin 😅 😂😂 il faut rectifier le prénom Monsieur
Nyatakan matlamat dan perlukan wang
I think you should be able to baptize cows if you wanted to