Hello Danceliners! Here's the Evolution of Sugarplum fairy (Mariinsky version). Since there are many others that are very interesting to watch we're gonna publish separate videos for them 🩰 Merry Christmas 🎄⛄
As a dancer I really hate how ballet and other styles of dance have become an extension/trick show. The first dance radiates with technique, grace and story telling techniques. Today, if you can’t do 10 perfect pirouettes and lift your leg past your head you simply aren’t good enough. Ballet is more than an acrobatic experience
I completely agree! I often feel like the musicality and storytelling are lacking. I am not a dancer, I was trained as a classical musician, and i often feel disappointed as the performance is more about how much powerful or flexible the movements are, rather than interpreting the music with your bodies.
@Hola well when you think about it, ballet is story telling. With out the sets and costumes, the dance moves and music convey the emotions and actions in the story. No narrator needed.
I’m not a dancer but the last two dancers were like too “perfect” that they looked stiff. The first dancer was graceful but still beautiful and perfect too.
Definitely. Some dancers look.more like gymnasts. A lot have lost the ability to have their own personality. I do love Nunez cos although wonderful technic has beautiful facial expressions and is her own person with lovely epaulment.
One thing about the sugar plum fairy that has always befuddled me was musicality. There are so many fun moments in the music and I couldn’t always clearly understand the connection between the choreo and it - until now. Efremova danced it the way I’ve always wanted to see it and really married the choreo and the music. And her bourrées… I just LOVE how she used them actually move across the stage and take up space!!!
You are so right. Her three little jumps in time with the characteristic three repeated notes in the music were so enchanting and 'right'. If there isn't the marriage between the music and its interpretation those little jumps can become just empty gestures. I've seen performances where they actually become grotesque and comical.
The way you always wanted to see it was a primitive idea of choreography where every note demands a corresponding step or gesture?? You woulda loved all the forgotten snoozefests from the 19th century
The first dancer is able to be so expressive with the aid of the slower tempo. I can't imagine why it's been speeded up over the years, to the obvious detriment of what the dancer can do within that tempo constraint.
I don’t think the tempo is actually slower. It seems slower because she uses more “hang time” to transition in and out of each movement, creating a real flow. The other dancers’ movements are more sudden.
And i know nothing about ballet but to me the face that the first girl is ever so slightly off beat makes it seem less rushed, the others are more on beat and makes it feel faster
Yes, she brings out the fairy like noone. Number 3 reminded me weirdly of swanlake. The arm movements are too fluid and not accentuated and abrupt enough to make it look as funny and cute as number 1.
With the first dancer everything makes absolute sense. I always thought this dance was messy; everytime I watched it, it felt like it was off beat. But not with that first ballerina. It just made sense.
Right! I think over time the song was sped up and it doesn’t make sense. I’ve always thought that it was weirdly off beat, but the first dancer made it make look great since she had more control and the tempo was slower
@@savanna2932 yes definitely. Especially when hearing the older ver then skipping to the newer ver it’s clearly sped up whereas the older ver is slower and takes on more grace and just fits better compared to now
Oh gosh finally I understand why Ballerina is always off beat and unsynchronized. I thought I am being rude and not open minded because I don't know much about Ballerina culture but after your explanation and watching the first ballerina, It does make sense.
I’m not a dancer, but I love seeing The Nutcracker every Christmas. It wasn’t until watching this video of the first dancer that I remembered that the Sugar Plum Fairy was supposed to be a toy. It was a much more interesting and magical performance from the first dancer with her precise, stiff, movements than the last one who was too smooth.
Exactly ! The first 2 dancers are like little toys, Christmas tree decorations. Such a wonderful impression! The last one is more like alive person. Beautiful too, but without this uncanny feeling of an alive doll. Probs modern day audience can’t get it and feel uncomfortable idk so sad that everything is focused on the visual side and glamour these days
Not a ballet dancer here but a physiotherapist. Efremova had more muscle mass in her lower extremities which allowed both the fluid movements & the power to “hold” her joints in various positions for longer lengths of time without tiring which enabled her to match the music better. The evolution is of the preferred, slimmer body “type” over one with more weight due to muscle mass.
For me Russian ballet is the best in the world. I would so love them to add in top professional physiotherapists and nutritionists to their ballet staff and watch their ballet dancers become much healthier and watch how their performances are taken to even more incredible heights.
Efremova was trained in the Soviet Ballet Schools. That is why their technique and artistry was the best. What I find interesting is if Efremova was thinner, she would still be a good contender for today's artists. That says a lot.
I am not a dancer but I was watching that thinking the same thing, her muscles make her moves more stable and precise. The other ones feel almost like paper or like a feather they don’t feel like a person exacting moves with their body. I almost feel like with each move your body grounds differently to the earth and it was like their bodies weren’t grounding during the moves with the last two women ❤ Ballet is so beautiful
Your comment makes the most sense to me. The first ballerina has the most “hang time” in her poses, and also in the transitions into and out of the poses, which makes the whole dance feel so much more organic and human. The other dancers were more robotic, like, fast-fast-POW! Fast, fast, POW! whereas the first dancer’s movements have a more “roly-poly” quality. In belly dancing, there is an idea that you should move like you’re in a ball of goo. Nothing should be sudden. You should spend as much time and energy and attention getting in and out of your poses as you spend in them. Plus, her stage presence was just captivating. It seems like she might be the more mature artist of the three.
googled the first ballerina to find more performances from her, but i also found out she recently passed in 2020...it appears she was also highly respected by many
Oh noo, I was hoping she's still alive and someone would read and translate for her all the lovely comments she got, because I think she deserves to know how much appreciated she is, also internationally, but I wanted to read more comments and saw yours. 😅 RIP, skilled ballerina. 💜
All three dancers performed beautifully but the first dance by Efremova was absolutely magical. Her fluid movements beautifully matched the music and it felt vibrant even on black and white film. I don't want to put down the following two dancers because they obviously worked hard and danced better than I ever could even in my wildest dreams. However, as time goes on they seemed progressively more mechanical and too perfect in their movements. It was like watching marionette puppets perform rather than a living doll like the sugar plum fairy is supposed to be. Both were undoubtedly well done on a technical aspect but they felt empty...
Interestingly Efremova, the first dancer had the best technique, more controlled, more graceful and more in time with the music. This is not an evolution but rather a comparison of different dancers.
Well said! I agree completely. Efremova had lovely legato and epaulement. The other two dancers were both good. The compilation is a comparison, not an evolution, which implies good to better or best.
I absolutely, completely agree. Sugarplum is hard to do. Very hard. I’ve seen so many videos and films of excellent ballerinas perform it and there were only a few who really nailed it. Lauren Cuthbertson being one of them. Maybe it’s because a Christmas ballet has to be magical and the fairy has to become real - even with difficult choreography. She has to be so delicate, soft, perfect and controlled. That is really hard. Also, there are hundreds of little girls watching and looking for this magical creature to be real - it’s the first ballet most children will see. I think that’s added pressure.
As someone who knows nothing about ballet and has never seen a live performance and only watched this out of boredom and mild curiosity- the first one is the best. She’s by far the most on beat and her tutu dances in sync with her. It’s so pretty and mesmerizing to watch.
The other two are technically very good but more staccato if that's a thing. Yes, the first was the best, her personality and acting shone through, she was more believable.
Not a dancer and didn't know much about ballet at all, but the first one, Efremova, left the biggest impression for me. I reallly love how she's really in tune with the music, and I dunno whether this was intentional or in choreo or not, but holy, in some parts, even her tutu fluttered in sync with the music, it's sooo pleasing 💕💕
This is how it was meant to be danced. It always looks messy and off beat to me, until I saw her perform. Now it looks like it actually goes with the music.
Yes, even the costuming was better. It was much simpler, yet made to move in such a way that it added to her beautiful, delicate, fairy-like performance.
The first dancer’s video reminds me of stop motion animation and truly feels like you’re watching a toy dancing across the stage. What impressive muscle control she had to express that!
Want to see a completely different performance of this is to watch Alicia Markova dancing it old footage with music added but my God how different it is. So much more too it and she is so light on her feet and although tiny is not like a stick insect. A lot of modern arrangements are far too stiff and correct for my liking. No.1 is the best for me, much more natural, if you can call any sugar plum natural😂.
I know nothing about ballet. But to me, the first performance was breathtaking. Slow pace, not rushed like the others. You can feel the emotion and passion she puts into her performance. Her pace is also more in tune with the music.
The music in new versions is sped up! Did you notice? It is visisble that other two dancers were trying to make it in time for the next move and the next one etc but because it's sepd up - they just rush and you can clearly see that, espcially when in comparison to the first dancer.
Not a dancer but musician, is incredible how the first dancer was following the music, her feet moves and body follows the music compass, her body express the music language, delicate notes delicate steps, strong notes more pirouettes and jumps. The first one is much better.
С каждым последующим видео, танец приобретает какую-то, все большую тяжеловесность. Первое же видео просто завораживает. Действительно, создаётся впечатление, будто перед нами фея, лёгкая, хрупкая.
В версии Вайнонена это партия Маши, а не феи. Здесь Светлана Ефремова из угловатой девочки расцветает в принцессу.☺ Обратите внимание. Партия начинается с мелких топотушек. В середине журчит время. И вот Маша пытается уже размашисто вышагивать от бедра.
Непонятно только, что этим видео хотели сказать. Классика во все времена остаётся классикой и видео танца балерины в 60-м г. , у нее более отточенные движения и большая лёгкость присутствует.
Я не балерина, но мне очень понравилась Ефремова! Как красиво она держит руки, каждый поворот головы, точно и грациозно выполняет все движения, не задирает ноги, выражение лица, как у феи, какая музыкальность каждого движения! Просто прелесть❤
Я бы даже сказала, что первая балерина танцует, а две следующие делают гимнастические упражнения под музыку: поднимают ноги, подпрыгивают... Возможно, они даже лучше ноги задирают и подпрыгивают, но пропадает ощущение волшебного танца. И в силу этого мне непонятно, почему это названо "эволюция"? Гимнастика, даже самая художественная, всё равно гимнастика.
Да, удивительная гармоничность, грация и элегантность, легкость. Она - единое целое с музыкой. Другие же две больше любуются собой, как мне показалось.
@@mariacyomi8355 Мне тоже так показалось. Последние, обладая большими физическими возможностями, напоминают больше механических куколок, в отличие от живой и чувственной Ефремовой.
Мне тоже больше всех советская балерина понравилась. Она как хрустальная кукла на серванте -- динь динь и замерла, очень четко передается это ощущение -- в этом же суть танца, это же всё новогодние игрушки.
Это партия Маши с 1934 года. И действительно девочки очень хрупкие, когда растут. Партия о взрослении девочки. Дети - рождественские игрушки родителей.
The first dancer maintained a straight line with her spine and only moved her head and arms…perfection!! Definitely think character and interpretation was lacking in the others!
Фея сахарной сливы в ,,щелкунчике" - фарфоровая статуэтка,по сути игрушка и двигаться должна ,как игрушка с подзаводом. Светлана Ефремова очень точно и технично передала в танце суть своей героини! Браво! У двух последующих балерин я этого образа не увидела.
А я всегда думала, это не игрушка а настоящая Фея, с шариками драже на ножках, которыми она, летая, постукивает по хрустальным бокалам с шампанским и вазочкам с пирожными, по фарфоровым тарелкам, по серебряным вилкам и ложкам на новогоднем столе, пока никто не видит, а услышав приближающихся людей быстренько убегает, и драже на ее ножках выбивают музыкальную дорожку отступления
Ничего не понимаю в балете, но первый танец завораживает, а другие два отставляют равнодушной. У первой балерины такое единение с музыкой и такие движения, хочется пересматривать снова и снова
@@professorpanchenkoи вращаться стали быстрее, и прыгать выше, и ноги выше поднимать, и гнуться, как в гимнастике. Не конкретно в этом танце, а вообще. Шакирова - чудесная балерина, но она ведь уже почти гимнастка.
@@BC-uj4nu, ноги выше/ да. Гнуться сильнее. А вращаться и бегать гораздо медленнее. Проверено на практике. Сами можете сравнить. И Цискаридзе подтверждает это. Сейчас все дети раскоординированны и , соответственно артисты тоже. Но и прогнуться и задрать ногу- тоже есть предел. Это конечная функция.
Efremova, the first one, is pure perfection. As in other comments, Sugarplum musicality is dificult and with many dancers it does not make sense and the whole thing ends up feeling akward to watch, kind of clumsy. Efremova perfect technique and musicality makes it a delight, if you don´t know ballet, itwill seem as if she is not doing much, but if you know ballet you know what she is doing is absolutely astonishing. In both cases you will feel mesmerised by this "little" dance.
Don't be ridiculous. I know nothing of ballet and yet I could tell her performance was leaps and bounds beyond that of the following two. You don't have to know ballet to be able to spot that.
@@AdeleiTeillana I don't know why you called me 'ridiculous'. Dancers are incredibly skilled at hiding any kind of injury, and are able to push on (inadvisably imo) through intense pain. I'm not even saying that she was injured, just asking, as I noticed she didn't fully come onto her left foot once or twice in the way she did with her right foot (and again I could be totally wrong). Jumping or hopping en pointe is very sore and there was a lot of that in this solo. My husband incidentally had the same reaction as I did, we were both a bit indifferent when we first watched Efremova, then coming back to her performance after seeing the other two, we were quite entranced and thought it was magical.
@@valgoldthorpe1377 I didn't previously call you ridiculous, though I will now, since you apparently have no idea how UA-cam comment sections work. I didn't @ you the first time around, therefore my comment wasn't directed at you. I also didn't fully read your response to me, because it was irrelevant since I wasn't talking to you in the first place.
Efremova is not dancing as the Sugar Plum Fairy. She looked like she IS the Sugar Plum Fairy ❤️. She seems utterly consumed in her art...not playing a part but she has internalized it so well and has such amazing technique to express this artistry. The way she played the Sugar Plum Fairy is more ethereal and magical because she doesn't look like shes trying to please people or perform. She looks like she just IS inherently magical and letting us see the magic and being herself. The other two looked like performers who were too conscious.
This the difference between the dancers of yesteryear who portrayed the role as they performed , o the dancers of todaywhoshow more athleticism to artistry.
Ефремова смотрит на каждый пальчик руки, провожая взглядом руки. Это волшебно. А так же чувство музыкальной фразы позволяет ей быть очень гармоничной. Безусловно две последующие балерины прекрасны, но мне почему-то не хватает этого волшебства Ефремовой.
@@irskri конечно, можно очень технично исполнять балетные партии, а вот если нет души в исполнении, а только техника, тогда можно и в гимнастику, например, податься, или в фигурное катание. Короче, спортом заняться - там техника приветствуется
That first dance was incredible. She was so delicate and graceful it felt so euphoric as she skipped and floated through a field of sugar plums. What extraordinary technique and skill she has. I especially enjoyed watching her retreat, her neck and limbs were so rigid yet appeared so natural. What an amazing artform. Mad respect
I agree that the first was the best embodiment of Sugarplum. All were beautiful, but the first was the epitome, not only in technique, but also in presence and true encompassing of all aspects of this role. I am assuming she was a little older than the other dancers, at this moment of performing, and that might explain some of it. But it makes me want to see what other videos of the first dancer are on UA-cam!!! She seemed to embody a rare gift, along with marvelous training. Thank you for posting!!
I didn't read the title properly, and just sat and watched all of these lovely dancers look ethereal. I understand now that it was meant to be a comparison but as a compilation I thought everyone danced wonderfully
Ikr, everybody is commenting about musicality and storytelling but they're all just dancing prettily and there doesn't seem to be much difference between them!
I love the first one. The grace, the control and most of all: simplisity of her movements made every second feel full. It was like she didn't follow the music, the music followed her. This is why the newer versions looks so messy, cause they have to kick higher, or spin faster to seem more impressive. But simplisity really is beautiful in ballet. It leaves room for so much more feeling and art instead of just tricks and gymnastics.
The first dancer! I could just see sugar and snowflakes flowing from her fingertips! That was the first time I've seen that choreography and not thought, wow, those hops must hurt. I just sat back and enjoyed the moment.
As someone who is really into costumes and did help the dance majors make their costumes one year in college, I also noticed the change in costume. The tutu became less & less straight out to form more or a bell shape by the 3rd rendition. Someone may have noted already as the comment section is full of interesting expertise. Thanks for showing us! I’m really excited to take ballet classes as an adult fairly soon. 👏🏻🩰
Wow... The dancer from the 60s has very refined and expressive dance. It's not even about technicity, it's more about pauses and meaningful phrases expressed through subtle dance movements. I'm not a big expert in ballet, but I either feel it or not. The first one was the best for me.
Обворожительная первая танцовщица (Ефремова) танцует душой. В ней всё балетное и танцевальное. Она фея из детской сказки. Фея! Недостижимая и загадочная, такая может исполнить любое детское мечтание! Она лучшая!
Все восхищаются балеринами. А я восхищаюсь Петром Ильичем Чайковским, создавшим такие нетленные музыкальные шедевры. Сколько бы я не слушала музыку Чайковского, всегда мурашки по коже.
Ефремова просто разлила магию по сцене....завораживающе, волшебно! Удивительно музыкально! Каждое движение пальчика и даже наверное дыхание в музыке и с музыкой...👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
The first, Efremova, is my favorite by far. There is a delicacy to her performance that fits the music and story. Her arm movements alone are graceful and captivating. Even her facial expression is part of the dance and story. Not really an evolution after her. Thanks for posting and happy holiday!
not a lot of people are talking about how the first one had great cinematography (started out on top, and had thought to framing rather than just put the camera in front), and great costumes (her tutu was puffier and less stiffer and every time she moved, it looked like she herself was a flower)
These are all very true, but not really impactful enough to skew the opinion. The dance overall is much more controlled when Efremova performed. Even the pace is better.
Efremova’s technique is rock solid. Her turns are like a metronome, with no finessing the final turn. Yet. I prefer the ethereal quality and bountiful bourrées of the following ballerina.
Same. Everything else about Evremova I was nodding going "looks strong" and then she'd start one of those turns as the music descends and it wouldn't quite line up
Wow Efremova was amazing. Never understood the connection between the dance and the choreography until now. Her controlled and slower movements really piece it together
@@katyabo1461 I have noticed that problem with a lot of the modern-day dancers. I think it's because ballet is viewed as more of a sport so they try to be as flamboyant as possible rather than making sure they're staying in time with the actual music.
@@rokelle_2012 agreed totally. Also the aesthetic requirement of very long legs has slowed down the overall performance tempo and the weird obsession with higher legs over épaulement and keeping turnout is kind of derailing the technical basis in the long run
I'm not a dancer and I don't watch ballet but seriously the first dancer mesmerized me. The way she moved its like she was the one creating the music. I was in awe....every move was fluid and graceful as if she's flooting in the air. There's ethereal and elegance in her performance. She looks like a visual manifestation of the very music being played. Unlike the other two who look like there is a check list that they need to meet at a certain section of the music. It felt rushed. But what do I know🤷. An ignorant on classical ballet but was captivated by the first dancer.....
Exactly! I was just telling my sister that the other two looked like they were told “You have to be at this spot at this part of the song, but you have to do so-and-so moves in between.” I loved Efremova’s rendition, she had such grace and control of her movements. I also noticed the other two dancers barely had much muscle mass to their legs, compared to Efremova. I hate what modern ballet has become.
I saw the Nutcracker performed at the Mariinsky in December 2021. It was simply magical: knowing that I was in the same building where the ballet had premiered under Tchaikovsky's conducting so long ago, it was like being transported into the past, even if the dances have changed slightly over the years. It's always the senior recital of the Vaganova Ballet Academy, and the dancers are simply unmatched.
The first dancer's choreography makes the most sense with the music imo, and I love how she brings the character to life. That's not to say I didn't appreciate the other two, because I did. They were both quite lovely in their own way, but I really enjoyed the choreography in the 1960 version.❤❤❤
Esfremova! Very contained, precise, and musical with no high legs to distract. And beautiful, fast turns. I don't see her weight as more than today's dancers as some of the comments say.
The other dancers should study carefully the absolute classical beauty and flawless technique of Efremova. These are truly lost elements in the art form today. Her eppaulement is just extraordinary. Happy Holidays everyone! ❤️
There is no fault with the dancers in my opinion. Just an interpretation of technique. I really appreciate the classical details and expression in Efremova's technique. It's her personal interpretation, especially in her eppaulement.
В первом танце больше событий происходит - каждое движение наполнено содержанием, завораживает не столько техника, сколько истории рассказанные в танце наклонами головы, улыбками, маленькими движениями, составляющими сюжет. В двух других отрывках мы смотрим на красивые движения, но в сюжет они не складываются, зрителю даже кажется, что сам танец короче, хотя он длится ровно столько же и укладывается в одну и ту же музыку.
Какая великолепная музыка. Каждая танцовщица прекрасна. У каждой свой танец, своя фея. Просто сказка! Спасибо за архивные записи. Мариинка - великая школа.
Former dancer here. It is encouraging to see how many people here recognize that Ms Efremova gave the most artistic and musical performance of the three. The two other dancers do represent represent changes in body type preference and an emphasis on athleticism over musicality and expression that is now in vogue in the ballet world and which unfortunately has fostered a loss of artistry. I hope that as the public can recognize this loss it will one day lead to the pendulum swinging back into the direction of artistry and elegance. Thank-you for posting this comparison. It is very informative.
I thought the same thing, OH yeah! This is supposed to be a fairy! She reminded me of that with her lovely, precise movements. And I enjoyed the rest of the dance watching the enchanting fairy, doing fairy things.
Svetlana Efremova ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️I am inspired most by her ❤️(Edited to include that her strength and technical abilities is evidence of what a true master she was, and who her professors and teachers were).
Hello Danceliners! Here's the Evolution of Sugarplum fairy (Mariinsky version). Since there are many others that are very interesting to watch we're gonna publish separate videos for them 🩰 Merry Christmas 🎄⛄
✨️💜✨️Thank you for sharing!! Merry Christmas 🎄❄️
That's what I thought as well.
@@susanelainesanner That puzzled me, too.
@@susanelainesanner Contraction of "going to".
would have been best if you had done a split screen with one dancer on one side. And the other dancer on the other side.
I dont think anyone really mentioned this but I love how much more the skirt bounces at that certain part of the song, its so fun to watch
The first girl’s skirt is so flouncy and fun
As a dancer I really hate how ballet and other styles of dance have become an extension/trick show. The first dance radiates with technique, grace and story telling techniques. Today, if you can’t do 10 perfect pirouettes and lift your leg past your head you simply aren’t good enough. Ballet is more than an acrobatic experience
I completely agree! I often feel like the musicality and storytelling are lacking. I am not a dancer, I was trained as a classical musician, and i often feel disappointed as the performance is more about how much powerful or flexible the movements are, rather than interpreting the music with your bodies.
I totally agree.
@Hola well when you think about it, ballet is story telling. With out the sets and costumes, the dance moves and music convey the emotions and actions in the story. No narrator needed.
I’m not a dancer but the last two dancers were like too “perfect” that they looked stiff. The first dancer was graceful but still beautiful and perfect too.
Definitely. Some dancers look.more like gymnasts. A lot have lost the ability to have their own personality. I do love Nunez cos although wonderful technic has beautiful facial expressions and is her own person with lovely epaulment.
One thing about the sugar plum fairy that has always befuddled me was musicality. There are so many fun moments in the music and I couldn’t always clearly understand the connection between the choreo and it - until now. Efremova danced it the way I’ve always wanted to see it and really married the choreo and the music. And her bourrées… I just LOVE how she used them actually move across the stage and take up space!!!
*one. IDK why it won’t let me edit that 😂
согласна, у меня так же - казалось, что танец и музыка не совпадают, но у Ефремовой всё в такт и в музыку, даже удивительно!
Couldn't agree more!
You are so right. Her three little jumps in time with the characteristic three repeated notes in the music were so enchanting and 'right'. If there isn't the marriage between the music and its interpretation those little jumps can become just empty gestures. I've seen performances where they actually become grotesque and comical.
The way you always wanted to see it was a primitive idea of choreography where every note demands a corresponding step or gesture?? You woulda loved all the forgotten snoozefests from the 19th century
The first dancer is able to be so expressive with the aid of the slower tempo. I can't imagine why it's been speeded up over the years, to the obvious detriment of what the dancer can do within that tempo constraint.
I don’t think the tempo is actually slower. It seems slower because she uses more “hang time” to transition in and out of each movement, creating a real flow. The other dancers’ movements are more sudden.
I preferred the second one from the 90s. A lot more grace especially in the hand gestures
I had a good listen and I don’t think it’s been sped up whatsoever- just a testament to how good the first girl is
And i know nothing about ballet but to me the face that the first girl is ever so slightly off beat makes it seem less rushed, the others are more on beat and makes it feel faster
Because it's become a competitive sport and it's awesome
Efremova really gave the impression of lightness and fairlyland. Wonderful.
You are a ballet fan, too? 😊. I love watching these videos, I took ballet lessons into my adult years and I miss being able to dance so much!
I thought the first ballerina was the best of the three shown. Her musicality, line, and shapes in negative space plus technique was perfect.
Agreed!
@@dawnlovescouture2644 heya girl! yes I am.
Yes, she brings out the fairy like noone. Number 3 reminded me weirdly of swanlake. The arm movements are too fluid and not accentuated and abrupt enough to make it look as funny and cute as number 1.
With the first dancer everything makes absolute sense. I always thought this dance was messy; everytime I watched it, it felt like it was off beat. But not with that first ballerina. It just made sense.
Right! I think over time the song was sped up and it doesn’t make sense. I’ve always thought that it was weirdly off beat, but the first dancer made it make look great since she had more control and the tempo was slower
@@savanna2932 yes definitely. Especially when hearing the older ver then skipping to the newer ver it’s clearly sped up whereas the older ver is slower and takes on more grace and just fits better compared to now
Oh gosh finally I understand why Ballerina is always off beat and unsynchronized. I thought I am being rude and not open minded because I don't know much about Ballerina culture but after your explanation and watching the first ballerina, It does make sense.
I completely agree
She was so light on her feet that she really looked like a fairy.
I’m not a dancer, but I love seeing The Nutcracker every Christmas. It wasn’t until watching this video of the first dancer that I remembered that the Sugar Plum Fairy was supposed to be a toy. It was a much more interesting and magical performance from the first dancer with her precise, stiff, movements than the last one who was too smooth.
yes!!! the first dancer channeled her as more of a toy which was better
Exactly ! The first 2 dancers are like little toys, Christmas tree decorations. Such a wonderful impression! The last one is more like alive person. Beautiful too, but without this uncanny feeling of an alive doll. Probs modern day audience can’t get it and feel uncomfortable idk
so sad that everything is focused on the visual side and glamour these days
I never knew she was supposed to be a toy even! With that knowledge, I d say the newer version are not really picking uo the tone
@@Luna-rs6rsthey are all toys except Clara. It's her dream
I agree!
Not a ballet dancer here but a physiotherapist. Efremova had more muscle mass in her lower extremities which allowed both the fluid movements & the power to “hold” her joints in various positions for longer lengths of time without tiring which enabled her to match the music better. The evolution is of the preferred, slimmer body “type” over one with more weight due to muscle mass.
For me Russian ballet is the best in the world. I would so love them to add in top professional physiotherapists and nutritionists to their ballet staff and watch their ballet dancers become much healthier and watch how their performances are taken to even more incredible heights.
Efremova was trained in the Soviet Ballet Schools. That is why their technique and artistry was the best. What I find interesting is if Efremova was thinner, she would still be a good contender for today's artists. That says a lot.
I am not a dancer but I was watching that thinking the same thing, her muscles make her moves more stable and precise. The other ones feel almost like paper or like a feather they don’t feel like a person exacting moves with their body. I almost feel like with each move your body grounds differently to the earth and it was like their bodies weren’t grounding during the moves with the last two women ❤ Ballet is so beautiful
Interestingly, I found the last dancer, though long and lithe, to be more leaden-footed.
Your comment makes the most sense to me. The first ballerina has the most “hang time” in her poses, and also in the transitions into and out of the poses, which makes the whole dance feel so much more organic and human.
The other dancers were more robotic, like, fast-fast-POW! Fast, fast, POW! whereas the first dancer’s movements have a more “roly-poly” quality.
In belly dancing, there is an idea that you should move like you’re in a ball of goo. Nothing should be sudden. You should spend as much time and energy and attention getting in and out of your poses as you spend in them.
Plus, her stage presence was just captivating. It seems like she might be the more mature artist of the three.
googled the first ballerina to find more performances from her, but i also found out she recently passed in 2020...it appears she was also highly respected by many
Oh noo, I was hoping she's still alive and someone would read and translate for her all the lovely comments she got, because I think she deserves to know how much appreciated she is, also internationally, but I wanted to read more comments and saw yours. 😅 RIP, skilled ballerina. 💜
Is she the one who made a final performance in her old age?
All three dancers performed beautifully but the first dance by Efremova was absolutely magical. Her fluid movements beautifully matched the music and it felt vibrant even on black and white film. I don't want to put down the following two dancers because they obviously worked hard and danced better than I ever could even in my wildest dreams. However, as time goes on they seemed progressively more mechanical and too perfect in their movements. It was like watching marionette puppets perform rather than a living doll like the sugar plum fairy is supposed to be. Both were undoubtedly well done on a technical aspect but they felt empty...
57 likes e nenhum comentário? deixe-me mudar isto!
Perfect explanation
I feel the same way after watching it like 3 times
Не сахарной сливы,а танец феи Драже!!!!!😅😅😅😅😅
❤
Interestingly Efremova, the first dancer had the best technique, more controlled, more graceful and more in time with the music. This is not an evolution but rather a comparison of different dancers.
Well said! I agree completely. Efremova had lovely legato and epaulement. The other two dancers were both good. The compilation is a comparison, not an evolution, which implies good to better or best.
I absolutely, completely agree. Sugarplum is hard to do. Very hard. I’ve seen so many videos and films of excellent ballerinas perform it and there were only a few who really nailed it. Lauren Cuthbertson being one of them. Maybe it’s because a Christmas ballet has to be magical and the fairy has to become real - even with difficult choreography. She has to be so delicate, soft, perfect and controlled. That is really hard. Also, there are hundreds of little girls watching and looking for this magical creature to be real - it’s the first ballet most children will see. I think that’s added pressure.
I completely agree with you. For me the most magical fairy is Nina Kaptsova, Bolshoi Theatre 2010, that's where evolution really is.
Agreed !
Agree completely!
As someone who knows nothing about ballet and has never seen a live performance and only watched this out of boredom and mild curiosity- the first one is the best. She’s by far the most on beat and her tutu dances in sync with her. It’s so pretty and mesmerizing to watch.
The other two are technically very good but more staccato if that's a thing. Yes, the first was the best, her personality and acting shone through, she was more believable.
First dancer's movements were so very controlled, and precise and it seems she could hold poses longer because she wasn't frail thin.
Indeed.
True
"Frail thin" when it's a slightly skinnier girl, yall are so weird
@@Hmmmnnhh ikr As if ballet dancers aren’t all muscular! They are far from “frail.” 😂
@@Hmmmnnhhdo not act like fatphobia and eating disorders are not a huge part of ballet in modern times
Светлана Ефремова❤ Как фарфоровая куколка, какие движения отточенные, легкая, хрупкая и музыкальная. Браво!!!
Not a dancer and didn't know much about ballet at all, but the first one, Efremova, left the biggest impression for me. I reallly love how she's really in tune with the music, and I dunno whether this was intentional or in choreo or not, but holy, in some parts, even her tutu fluttered in sync with the music, it's sooo pleasing 💕💕
her legs are stronger which gives her more control.
This is how it was meant to be danced. It always looks messy and off beat to me, until I saw her perform. Now it looks like it actually goes with the music.
@@cherrybomb921you are right
YES! like a flower opening every time she jumped. Well said.
Yes, even the costuming was better. It was much simpler, yet made to move in such a way that it added to her beautiful, delicate, fairy-like performance.
The first dancer’s video reminds me of stop motion animation and truly feels like you’re watching a toy dancing across the stage. What impressive muscle control she had to express that!
Want to see a completely different performance of this is to watch Alicia Markova dancing it old footage with music added but my God how different it is. So much more too it and she is so light on her feet and although tiny is not like a stick insect. A lot of modern arrangements are far too stiff and correct for my liking. No.1 is the best for me, much more natural, if you can call any sugar plum natural😂.
I know nothing about ballet. But to me, the first performance was breathtaking. Slow pace, not rushed like the others. You can feel the emotion and passion she puts into her performance. Her pace is also more in tune with the music.
The music in new versions is sped up! Did you notice? It is visisble that other two dancers were trying to make it in time for the next move and the next one etc but because it's sepd up - they just rush and you can clearly see that, espcially when in comparison to the first dancer.
just because one is performed slower doesn't automatically mean the others are rushed lol
Not a dancer but musician, is incredible how the first dancer was following the music, her feet moves and body follows the music compass, her body express the music language, delicate notes delicate steps, strong notes more pirouettes and jumps. The first one is much better.
Being a musician you should have noticed and noticed the tempo of the first one is significantly slower.
Noticed and noted*
Efremova's performance reminded me of hundred year old animation-fluttery and unreal and toylike. Felt like fiction and flights of fantasy. Magical!
С каждым последующим видео, танец приобретает какую-то, все большую тяжеловесность. Первое же видео просто завораживает. Действительно, создаётся впечатление, будто перед нами фея, лёгкая, хрупкая.
В версии Вайнонена это партия Маши, а не феи. Здесь Светлана Ефремова из угловатой девочки расцветает в принцессу.☺
Обратите внимание. Партия начинается с мелких топотушек. В середине журчит время. И вот Маша пытается уже размашисто вышагивать от бедра.
почему-то мне тоже так показалось
Непонятно только, что этим видео хотели сказать. Классика во все времена остаётся классикой и видео танца балерины в 60-м г. , у нее более отточенные движения и большая лёгкость присутствует.
и не только тяжеловесность, но и очевидное упрощение!
Ну вы даете...напротив же, с каждым последующим более выражена лёгкость и грация!
Я не балерина, но мне очень понравилась Ефремова! Как красиво она держит руки, каждый поворот головы, точно и грациозно выполняет все движения, не задирает ноги, выражение лица, как у феи, какая музыкальность каждого движения! Просто прелесть❤
Видна школа
Я бы даже сказала, что первая балерина танцует, а две следующие делают гимнастические упражнения под музыку: поднимают ноги, подпрыгивают... Возможно, они даже лучше ноги задирают и подпрыгивают, но пропадает ощущение волшебного танца. И в силу этого мне непонятно, почему это названо "эволюция"? Гимнастика, даже самая художественная, всё равно гимнастика.
@@SvetlanaShedо😢
All three dances are beautiful, but the bounce that the first one's skirt has really adds to the choreography imo, it's more delicate and flower like
Ефремова погрузила в это ощущение медитативности и таинственности, она и музыка были единым целым, ей удалось передать это завораживающее настроение.
Может быть это черно - белая картинка добавляет шарма и таинственности? Но мне тоже так показалось.
Да, удивительная гармоничность, грация и элегантность, легкость. Она - единое целое с музыкой. Другие же две больше любуются собой, как мне показалось.
@mariacyomi8355 Мне тоже так показалось. Ефремова и музыка - одно целое, она музыку и сказку танцует. Завораживает своим танцем.
@@mariacyomi8355 Мне тоже так показалось. Последние, обладая большими физическими возможностями, напоминают больше механических куколок, в отличие от живой и чувственной Ефремовой.
По моему, только Ефремова попадала в такт музыке, остальные только приблизительно
Мне тоже больше всех советская балерина понравилась. Она как хрустальная кукла на серванте -- динь динь и замерла, очень четко передается это ощущение -- в этом же суть танца, это же всё новогодние игрушки.
Это партия Маши с 1934 года. И действительно девочки очень хрупкие, когда растут. Партия о взрослении девочки. Дети - рождественские игрушки родителей.
@@santashmyakus8516фея Дражже и Мари - два разных персонажа балета...
@@Alexandra_Indina Еще раз. Это партия Маши с 1934 года. Фея Дрожже из балета выкинута. Хореография под Машу.
@@Alexandra_Indina😮
г
Efremova is by far the best one here, the movements are with the music, she floats as she dances, the tempo is perfectly right and matched
The first dancer maintained a straight line with her spine and only moved her head and arms…perfection!! Definitely think character and interpretation was lacking in the others!
Фея сахарной сливы в ,,щелкунчике" - фарфоровая статуэтка,по сути игрушка и двигаться должна ,как игрушка с подзаводом. Светлана Ефремова очень точно и технично передала в танце суть своей героини! Браво!
У двух последующих балерин я этого образа не увидела.
Да Светлана поразительно чувствует музыку.
Свободу Марии Москалевой!12 летнюю девочку Марию Москалеву забрали из семьи и заперли в приюте за антивоенный рисунок!😢
А я всегда думала, это не игрушка а настоящая Фея, с шариками драже на ножках, которыми она, летая, постукивает по хрустальным бокалам с шампанским и вазочкам с пирожными, по фарфоровым тарелкам, по серебряным вилкам и ложкам на новогоднем столе, пока никто не видит, а услышав приближающихся людей быстренько убегает, и драже на ее ножках выбивают музыкальную дорожку отступления
Фея Драже, никакой не сахарной сливы. В Великобритании в старину драже называли "sugar plum" из-за формы. К сливам это не имеет никакого отношения.
@@akunamatata777 сахарная слива-это вольный перевод дражже.
Ничего не понимаю в балете, но первый танец завораживает, а другие два отставляют равнодушной. У первой балерины такое единение с музыкой и такие движения, хочется пересматривать снова и снова
Первая лучше, да. А с тех пор ничего не изменилось в балете. Ну то есть, вращаться не стали быстрее, а прыгать выше. Даже наоборот.
@@professorpanchenkoи вращаться стали быстрее, и прыгать выше, и ноги выше поднимать, и гнуться, как в гимнастике. Не конкретно в этом танце, а вообще. Шакирова - чудесная балерина, но она ведь уже почти гимнастка.
@@BC-uj4nu, ноги выше/ да. Гнуться сильнее.
А вращаться и бегать гораздо медленнее. Проверено на практике. Сами можете сравнить. И Цискаридзе подтверждает это. Сейчас все дети раскоординированны и , соответственно артисты тоже.
Но и прогнуться и задрать ногу- тоже есть предел. Это конечная функция.
Ничего не понимаю в балете, но мне больше понравилась последняя, уж не знаю почему, она как-то легче что-ли...
@@BC-uj4nu А балет это все же не гимнастика.. смысл не в том, кто выше и дальше. Прыгают хорошо, ам души в танце нет. Все в технике
Efremova, the first one, is pure perfection. As in other comments, Sugarplum musicality is dificult and with many dancers it does not make sense and the whole thing ends up feeling akward to watch, kind of clumsy. Efremova perfect technique and musicality makes it a delight, if you don´t know ballet, itwill seem as if she is not doing much, but if you know ballet you know what she is doing is absolutely astonishing. In both cases you will feel mesmerised by this "little" dance.
I was wondering if her left foot looked as if it might be injured. Just asking your opinion. Very beautiful performance whatever.
idk a thing abt ballet, but her dance captivated me more. i didn’t even realize until the second dancer came on. both are beautiful, though
Don't be ridiculous. I know nothing of ballet and yet I could tell her performance was leaps and bounds beyond that of the following two. You don't have to know ballet to be able to spot that.
@@AdeleiTeillana I don't know why you called me 'ridiculous'. Dancers are incredibly skilled at hiding any kind of injury, and are able to push on (inadvisably imo) through intense pain. I'm not even saying that she was injured, just asking, as I noticed she didn't fully come onto her left foot once or twice in the way she did with her right foot (and again I could be totally wrong). Jumping or hopping en pointe is very sore and there was a lot of that in this solo. My husband incidentally had the same reaction as I did, we were both a bit indifferent when we first watched Efremova, then coming back to her performance after seeing the other two, we were quite entranced and thought it was magical.
@@valgoldthorpe1377 I didn't previously call you ridiculous, though I will now, since you apparently have no idea how UA-cam comment sections work. I didn't @ you the first time around, therefore my comment wasn't directed at you. I also didn't fully read your response to me, because it was irrelevant since I wasn't talking to you in the first place.
Efremova is not dancing as the Sugar Plum Fairy. She looked like she IS the Sugar Plum Fairy ❤️. She seems utterly consumed in her art...not playing a part but she has internalized it so well and has such amazing technique to express this artistry. The way she played the Sugar Plum Fairy is more ethereal and magical because she doesn't look like shes trying to please people or perform. She looks like she just IS inherently magical and letting us see the magic and being herself. The other two looked like performers who were too conscious.
Very well said!
This the difference between the dancers of yesteryear who portrayed the role as they performed , o the dancers of todaywhoshow more athleticism to artistry.
❤
Ефремова смотрит на каждый пальчик руки, провожая взглядом руки. Это волшебно. А так же чувство музыкальной фразы позволяет ей быть очень гармоничной. Безусловно две последующие балерины прекрасны, но мне почему-то не хватает этого волшебства Ефремовой.
Когда не хватает техники, приходится брать артистизмом, на пальчики смотреть.
@@irskri На пальчики смотреть это базовая техника, так-то. Балет это не только ного-руко дрыгание. Но и работа шеей.
@@irskri балет это не спорт. Это искусство. Одной техникой далеко не уедешь
@@irskri конечно, можно очень технично исполнять балетные партии, а вот если нет души в исполнении, а только техника, тогда можно и в гимнастику, например, податься, или в фигурное катание. Короче, спортом заняться - там техника приветствуется
Конечно же, Ефремова!!! И никакой зволюции. Просто мастерство - оно вне времени.
That first dance was incredible. She was so delicate and graceful it felt so euphoric as she skipped and floated through a field of sugar plums. What extraordinary technique and skill she has. I especially enjoyed watching her retreat, her neck and limbs were so rigid yet appeared so natural. What an amazing artform. Mad respect
The first one is beautiful and more moving to watch.
I agree that the first was the best embodiment of Sugarplum. All were beautiful, but the first was the epitome, not only in technique, but also in presence and true encompassing of all aspects of this role. I am assuming she was a little older than the other dancers, at this moment of performing, and that might explain some of it. But it makes me want to see what other videos of the first dancer are on UA-cam!!! She seemed to embody a rare gift, along with marvelous training. Thank you for posting!!
У Ефремовой танец лёгкий ,волшебный,глаз не оторвать !
I didn't read the title properly, and just sat and watched all of these lovely dancers look ethereal. I understand now that it was meant to be a comparison but as a compilation I thought everyone danced wonderfully
Ikr, everybody is commenting about musicality and storytelling but they're all just dancing prettily and there doesn't seem to be much difference between them!
Same thoughts here. They all look like the same choreography to me? I didn’t even pick up on the music being sped up. I even watched a second time!
I love the first one. The grace, the control and most of all: simplisity of her movements made every second feel full. It was like she didn't follow the music, the music followed her. This is why the newer versions looks so messy, cause they have to kick higher, or spin faster to seem more impressive. But simplisity really is beautiful in ballet. It leaves room for so much more feeling and art instead of just tricks and gymnastics.
Ефремова-вся воплощение музыки. Через неё я поняла этот танец) восхитительно.
The first dancer! I could just see sugar and snowflakes flowing from her fingertips! That was the first time I've seen that choreography and not thought, wow, those hops must hurt. I just sat back and enjoyed the moment.
Костюм проще, а техника исполнения лучше. Браво Ефремова. 🌹🌹🌹
As someone who is really into costumes and did help the dance majors make their costumes one year in college, I also noticed the change in costume. The tutu became less & less straight out to form more or a bell shape by the 3rd rendition. Someone may have noted already as the comment section is full of interesting expertise. Thanks for showing us! I’m really excited to take ballet classes as an adult fairly soon. 👏🏻🩰
Wow... The dancer from the 60s has very refined and expressive dance. It's not even about technicity, it's more about pauses and meaningful phrases expressed through subtle dance movements. I'm not a big expert in ballet, but I either feel it or not. The first one was the best for me.
И всё же Ефремова! У неё больше артистичности, она - Фея! Остальные хороши, но у них больше от гимнастики.
I'm actually suprised but I loved the first one. She was so much more controlled than the other 2
Обворожительная первая танцовщица (Ефремова) танцует душой. В ней всё балетное и танцевальное.
Она фея из детской сказки. Фея! Недостижимая и загадочная, такая может исполнить любое детское мечтание! Она лучшая!
Все восхищаются балеринами. А я восхищаюсь Петром Ильичем Чайковским, создавшим такие нетленные музыкальные шедевры. Сколько бы я не слушала музыку Чайковского, всегда мурашки по коже.
Have you ever heard his Hymn of the cherubim? I had not until last week. Look it up - absolutely amazing!
Svetlana Efremova from 1960 is the most enchanting. She has precision, grace and musicality that the later ballerinas don't even approach.
The first dancers perfect synchronization with the little dings of the song was beautiful!
у первой танцовщицы лучше всех получился танец, а не просто "упорядоченные движения". Связь с музыкой какая! Все выверено, все в такт!
В точку про "упорядоченные движения"!
1:03 blows me away. No one compares.
Да, Светлана Ефремова восхитительна! Аж дрожь в коленках! Несколько раз пересмотрела. 👍💐
the first one had this certain magic. The other two were just very good dancers.
Ефремова как эфир. Все восхитительно, даже ее платье понравилось больше. Оно какое-то мистическое. Супер. Спасибо, что показали такой шедевр.
Цискаридзе же сказал, что все что есть в балете сегодня это не тот уровень, что раньше.
@@fleshka5038 похоже, что так)
Ефремова просто разлила магию по сцене....завораживающе, волшебно! Удивительно музыкально! Каждое движение пальчика и даже наверное дыхание в музыке и с музыкой...👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
The first, Efremova, is my favorite by far. There is a delicacy to her performance that fits the music and story. Her arm movements alone are graceful and captivating. Even her facial expression is part of the dance and story. Not really an evolution after her.
Thanks for posting and happy holiday!
Delicacy is a perfect word for her. Being light on one's feet is not about body type or frame.
The first dancer was magical. Just perfect
not a lot of people are talking about how the first one had great cinematography (started out on top, and had thought to framing rather than just put the camera in front), and great costumes (her tutu was puffier and less stiffer and every time she moved, it looked like she herself was a flower)
These are all very true, but not really impactful enough to skew the opinion. The dance overall is much more controlled when Efremova performed. Even the pace is better.
и это тоже, НО ВАЖНО, КАКОВА ОНА САМА В ТАНЦЕ, А ОНА- ШЕДЕВР❤
The first dancer had charisma, had an energy and a charm that got my gaze focused on her dancing. She was a natural born ballet dancer
I know nothing about ballet technique, but the first ballerina's performance was so lovely, I could hardly watch the other two.
Прекрасны все балерины!!!!!это питерская балетная школа!!!!!! Сколько изящества,сколько женственности!!!!!браво!!!!!и всё-таки,Ефремова -лучшая!!!!!!
Efremova dances this magnificently, so light, so clear, fairy-like ; her stillness is like magic. Thank you for posting.
The leg strength on these women is incredible! But the first one was ABSOLUTE grace! It was just gorgeous!
Just in awe with Efremova, who perfectly and properly ends each movement and is in complete harmony with the music.
Lovely to see Efremova shown here who was so never seemed to get the recognition she deserved for her graceful poise and technical polish.
Efremova’s technique is rock solid. Her turns are like a metronome, with no finessing the final turn. Yet. I prefer the ethereal quality and bountiful bourrées of the following ballerina.
I really like the second one as well - she's bouncy and fairy-like and seems a little bit more in touch with the music.
Same. Everything else about Evremova I was nodding going "looks strong" and then she'd start one of those turns as the music descends and it wouldn't quite line up
She is supposed to be imitating a doll tho
Efremova was amazing in that piece. Her skill & timing were just breath taking & yet also a joy to watch.
Wow Efremova was amazing. Never understood the connection between the dance and the choreography until now. Her controlled and slower movements really piece it together
Ефремова очень понравилась-настоящая Фея !
I love the first one. Full with emotion. The last one is too perfect for me.
She can't be perfect, moving out of music!)
@@katyabo1461 I have noticed that problem with a lot of the modern-day dancers. I think it's because ballet is viewed as more of a sport so they try to be as flamboyant as possible rather than making sure they're staying in time with the actual music.
That being said, I honestly only noticed her being the tiniest bit fast, but still mostly keeping to the music.
you said it!! it’s all tricks!!! i love it when dancers maintain rhythm.
@@rokelle_2012 agreed totally. Also the aesthetic requirement of very long legs has slowed down the overall performance tempo and the weird obsession with higher legs over épaulement and keeping turnout is kind of derailing the technical basis in the long run
Первая лучше всех ! Прямо куколка !!!😍🌺🌺🌺💐
I'm not a dancer and I don't watch ballet but seriously the first dancer mesmerized me. The way she moved its like she was the one creating the music. I was in awe....every move was fluid and graceful as if she's flooting in the air. There's ethereal and elegance in her performance. She looks like a visual manifestation of the very music being played. Unlike the other two who look like there is a check list that they need to meet at a certain section of the music. It felt rushed. But what do I know🤷. An ignorant on classical ballet but was captivated by the first dancer.....
Exactly! I was just telling my sister that the other two looked like they were told “You have to be at this spot at this part of the song, but you have to do so-and-so moves in between.” I loved Efremova’s rendition, she had such grace and control of her movements. I also noticed the other two dancers barely had much muscle mass to their legs, compared to Efremova. I hate what modern ballet has become.
I saw the Nutcracker performed at the Mariinsky in December 2021. It was simply magical: knowing that I was in the same building where the ballet had premiered under Tchaikovsky's conducting so long ago, it was like being transported into the past, even if the dances have changed slightly over the years. It's always the senior recital of the Vaganova Ballet Academy, and the dancers are simply unmatched.
The first dancer's choreography makes the most sense with the music imo, and I love how she brings the character to life.
That's not to say I didn't appreciate the other two, because I did.
They were both quite lovely in their own way, but I really enjoyed the choreography in the 1960 version.❤❤❤
Esfremova! Very contained, precise, and musical with no high legs to distract. And beautiful, fast turns. I don't see her weight as more than today's dancers as some of the comments say.
The first lovely lady really takes her time and nails it because of this. She works WITH the music.
Wow! The forst ballerina is everything I wantwd to be when I was young and danced ballet. She's grace. Ballet was so magical!
The other dancers should study carefully the absolute classical beauty and flawless technique of Efremova. These are truly lost elements in the art form today. Her eppaulement is just extraordinary. Happy Holidays everyone! ❤️
I don't think it's the other dancers who are the problem. It's the choreographers and directors.
It's not the fault of the dancers how they are being taught and the different physical aspects they have to deal with now in ballet.
There is no fault with the dancers in my opinion. Just an interpretation of technique. I really appreciate the classical details and expression in Efremova's technique. It's her personal interpretation, especially in her eppaulement.
@@fleurdelis335 definitely epaulment!
Так лучше всего из 60х: самая музыкальное, чистое, изысканное исполнение. Чем больше по времени вперёд, тем более размазанное(((
Efremova Svetlana's dance is unparalleled. She moves as if breathing, so perfectly natural and harmonious. It is the highest degree of art.
В первом танце больше событий происходит - каждое движение наполнено содержанием, завораживает не столько техника, сколько истории рассказанные в танце наклонами головы, улыбками, маленькими движениями, составляющими сюжет. В двух других отрывках мы смотрим на красивые движения, но в сюжет они не складываются, зрителю даже кажется, что сам танец короче, хотя он длится ровно столько же и укладывается в одну и ту же музыку.
Efremova, the first dancer, is mesmerizing. She is dancing as the toy come to life, every step with the music. She is the one who makes it make sense.
Светлана просто чудо! Хочется пересматривать вновь и вновь!
Everybody's comments and replies are incredibly excellent. Brilliant, smart, knowledgable.
Какая великолепная музыка. Каждая танцовщица прекрасна. У каждой свой танец, своя фея. Просто сказка! Спасибо за архивные записи. Мариинка - великая школа.
Очень понравились все три! Прекрасные феи Драже!❤
I definitely feel Efremova was the best our of the 3. Perfect technique, graceful, most pleasing to watch.
Как три хрустальных куколки станцевали 🥹 Это было ВОЛШЕБНО 👏🥹🌷🌷🌷
Former dancer here. It is encouraging to see how many people here recognize that Ms Efremova gave the most artistic and musical performance of the three. The two other dancers do represent represent changes in body type preference and an emphasis on athleticism over musicality and expression that is now in vogue in the ballet world and which unfortunately has fostered a loss of artistry. I hope that as the public can recognize this loss it will one day lead to the pendulum swinging back into the direction of artistry and elegance. Thank-you for posting this comparison. It is very informative.
Да, у Ефремовой всё математически только, все жесты, движения идеальны. И одухотворены.
Все прекрасны! Но пересматривать хочется только Ефремову👍🦋
Можно найти и запись с Ириной Колпаковой.
Wow! After the first one, the dance of the sugarplum fairy finally makes sense!
I thought the same thing, OH yeah! This is supposed to be a fairy! She reminded me of that with her lovely, precise movements. And I enjoyed the rest of the dance watching the enchanting fairy, doing fairy things.
Svetlana Efremova ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️I am inspired most by her ❤️(Edited to include that her strength and technical abilities is evidence of what a true master she was, and who her professors and teachers were).
Noooo! They took out the first video, that was my favorite one 😢
I'm looking for it too! It was my favourite
Efremova was divine! I was mesmerized.
Светлана Ефремова - бесподобна! Жаль, не знала о ней раньше.
The 1st one is simply mesmerising, I mean, the others are really good too, but the fluency and the angelic of the 1st one is amazing and captivating 😍
The first dancer is my favorite soo beautiful !!! She looked like a real fairy with such a graceful delicate dance! 😍
The artistry in the 1960’s was just lovely.