Nitrogen is... ironic.

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
  • Unfortunately, I had to cut out the part that goes ‘What makes things worse is that humans have to use high temperature and pressure to break it open but some bacteria can just do it outside.’ So yes, we can get at it, but it’s not easy for us.
    Visit us on Instagram:
    / sannijuroku
    Three Twentysix Project Leader: Dr Andrew Robertson
    3D animations/production assistant: Es Hiranpakorn
    Graphic Design: Maria Sucianto
    This video was produced at Kyushu University and supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP21K02904. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Kyushu University, JSPS or MEXT.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 445

  • @jonasjaciunskis3170
    @jonasjaciunskis3170 8 місяців тому +2552

    iron must be the truly ironic element :)

    • @egay86292
      @egay86292 8 місяців тому +53

      you get my vote.

    • @kayakMike1000
      @kayakMike1000 8 місяців тому +31

      You best me to it.

    • @keithbromley6070
      @keithbromley6070 8 місяців тому +56

      Read the captions that appear while he’s talking. He wrote “Apart from Fe obviously”.

    • @DrDeuteron
      @DrDeuteron 8 місяців тому

      @@keithbromley6070well then, Steel.

    • @Mustafa_Shahzad
      @Mustafa_Shahzad 8 місяців тому +2

      +1

  • @kirstenkremer-yq6yc
    @kirstenkremer-yq6yc 8 місяців тому +91

    Hm, I just remember when you light a heap of magnesium powder, it will form a solid magnesia shell on the outside, so no fresh air can get inside. At some time the magnesium will have burned with all the oxygen inside, so it just continues reacting with the nitrogen.
    Oh, and if you burn magnesium inside a cube of dry ice, it will get the oxygen out of that and leave you with carbon.

    • @ThreeTwentysix
      @ThreeTwentysix  8 місяців тому +21

      I didn't know that so thank you for the comment. It led me to this fantastic (as always) video by Periodic Table of Elements that demonstrates exactly that effect: ua-cam.com/video/LclOOAT6pvA/v-deo.htmlsi=6mvXrN3j11uERkyP

    • @appsenence9244
      @appsenence9244 2 місяці тому +2

      Oxygen is quite ironic. Cuz theres so much of it in our crust. Only a small percentage is in the atmosphere

  • @funnyfish1982
    @funnyfish1982 2 місяці тому +3

    I think technetium, because it should've never been radioactive.

  • @baganatube
    @baganatube 8 місяців тому +2

    Well, if N2 wasn't that strong, it won't get its percentage in the atmosphere, because it would then be easily absorbed by living things.

  • @ChromiumFist
    @ChromiumFist 8 місяців тому +8

    I believe lightning also produces nitrogen that plants can use.

  • @seb612schuth
    @seb612schuth 8 місяців тому +3

    Nitrogen can create relatively stable covalent bonds with its vast electron clouds configuration. Valence electron are 3 and 5, but can also form bonds of multiple 2 and 4. That is versatile.

  • @blinkingmanchannel
    @blinkingmanchannel 5 місяців тому +2

    OUTSTANDING! In a few seconds you provide the "jist" of ... that I can use to see how to approach organic chemistry. Awesome!

  • @geroldy4546
    @geroldy4546 16 днів тому

    Nitrogen fixing has to be one of the coolest evolutionarily-created processes

  • @greenberrygk
    @greenberrygk 6 днів тому +1

    When you gotta pull out the vanadium just for a little nitrogen

  • @danmartens8855
    @danmartens8855 8 місяців тому +2

    Molybdenum and Vanadium are required just to get at elemental Nitrogen necessary for life? Wow! That is an amazing accidentally evolved enzyme.

  • @elgracko
    @elgracko 8 місяців тому +2

    Lightning also separetes atmospheric nitrogen, i think

  • @paulwary
    @paulwary 8 місяців тому +1

    Hydrogen is ironic because although it’s the simplest and most abundant in the universe, we don’t quite know where to put it in the periodic table.

  • @NoSignificantHarassment.
    @NoSignificantHarassment. Місяць тому

    "My stand, nitrogen molecule, has no weakness"

  • @newbie4789
    @newbie4789 6 днів тому

    The fact that nitrogenase uses Molybdenum and shit like that is CRAZY

  • @UziMan-Science-Math
    @UziMan-Science-Math Місяць тому

    "just nuke it"
    - that one friend

  • @walterbrink5391
    @walterbrink5391 2 місяці тому

    The iron in our blood cells used to make haemoglobin does not make our blood attracted to magnets. In fact, blood it slightly repulsed by magnets.

  • @aljazbrilj1698
    @aljazbrilj1698 29 днів тому +1

    If there's a challenge somebody is gonna crack it

  • @chrisrus1965
    @chrisrus1965 8 місяців тому

    The guy who made it available was simultaneously the best and worst people ever.

  • @gabrielmachado4795
    @gabrielmachado4795 2 місяці тому

    My work is precisely trying to activate this bond to make it useful for us

  • @KasimierLP
    @KasimierLP 9 днів тому

    The really ironic part here is the Iron catalyst in the Haber Bosch process.

  • @charanjitsingh7640
    @charanjitsingh7640 7 місяців тому

    Thats where lightening strikes comes in clutch.

  • @beatmasterbossy
    @beatmasterbossy 2 місяці тому

    That's why our brain loves those amine/amide groups.

  • @Raptorman0909
    @Raptorman0909 2 місяці тому

    Ironic could be the Noble Gasses, but ironic in a different way...

  • @Robert_McGarry_Poems
    @Robert_McGarry_Poems 8 місяців тому +4

    Phosphorus 5 bonds. And most of boron chemistry...

  • @tonymouannes
    @tonymouannes 8 місяців тому

    That's probably why 78% of our atmosphere is nitrogen. It's the only major gas that doesn't react much.

  • @chubeye1187
    @chubeye1187 8 місяців тому +1

    The oxygen from photosynthesis comes from the water molecule, not CO2

  • @jadonabuaqil2717
    @jadonabuaqil2717 Місяць тому

    Water is ironic because both hydrogen and oxygen are flammable, but water puts out flames

  • @astritkaja9028
    @astritkaja9028 7 днів тому

    Nitrogen + shugar = power explosion.

  • @jarekwrzosek2048
    @jarekwrzosek2048 7 місяців тому

    Oxygen is the most ironic IMHO. Alone, it makes things burn. But combine it with extremely volatile and flammable hydrogen, and it makes water, that can douse fire.

  • @rk-fb5hw
    @rk-fb5hw 2 місяці тому

    Of course I have heard of organic chemistry, but never ironic chemistry. I like the idea.

  • @RasneeshRasneesh
    @RasneeshRasneesh 23 дні тому

    Radon is "ironic", because it is a noble gas (nonreactive), but "radioactive" at the same time!

  • @DimiDzi
    @DimiDzi 2 місяці тому

    gold is truly ironic because despite being a metal it makes only acids and salts but no bases

  • @Cybrsk8r
    @Cybrsk8r 8 місяців тому

    All the lighter elements are more common than heavier elements because all the elements, up to iron, can be created in the cores of large stars. Elements above iron, however, are only created during super nova explosions. The gold in the ring on your finger, was created in a super nova.

  • @curufinwe741
    @curufinwe741 8 місяців тому +1

    So inert as N-2, so very much...not inert as N-3

  • @aabp2317
    @aabp2317 8 місяців тому

    Luckily for us, those bacteria came across that insanely complex enzyme by chance, knew how to use it, somehow put the recipe in their DNA and made life on earth possible for us.

  • @badburrito-ti5wr
    @badburrito-ti5wr 8 місяців тому

    Water is ironic. Separately oxygen and hydrogen are explosive, but together equals life.

    • @atlasz911
      @atlasz911 8 місяців тому

      Some Sodium and Chlorine makes it even better :-)

  • @kabirvariava4031
    @kabirvariava4031 2 місяці тому

    damn i would agree that those clusters are pretty... metal

  • @AloisMahdal
    @AloisMahdal 8 місяців тому

    Whatever the most ironic element is, it's not iron. That just would not be ironic enough.

  • @vivianmunroe717
    @vivianmunroe717 8 місяців тому

    We can supply sufficient pressure and heat to create diamond (extremely durable), but gold ( a pretty soft metal) still eludes us.

    • @lemons1559
      @lemons1559 8 місяців тому +2

      Transmuting elements is a much more difficult task than turning carbon into carbon.

  • @freespeechorgetsilenced
    @freespeechorgetsilenced Місяць тому

    nitrogen is #7 (a prime number)on the periodic table of elements. The way prime numbers work also reflects the way matter works. Seven is an anomoly of math.

  • @noway8233
    @noway8233 Місяць тому

    This dude must apear in Beaking Bad😅

  • @whatzause
    @whatzause 7 місяців тому

    This seems to imply we NEED to get at N. How badly do we need it? Is available N in short supply for certain uses? (Medicines, chemical compounds, or anything?)

  • @Jonasz314
    @Jonasz314 Місяць тому

    Yes I'll share a bit of ironic chemistry.
    The reaction 1/2 N2 + O2 -> NO2 is thermodynamically a total reaction. Given this, all the oxygen in the atmosphere should be consumed, and NO2 is a notoriously toxic gas (part of NOx, which are all known to be harmful to humans and pretty much any breathing organism).
    The only thing which prevents this from happening is chemical cinetic - the reaction actually takes forever and in practice, never happens. We have that to thank for being alive.

  • @blablablablablablablablablbla
    @blablablablablablablablablbla Місяць тому

    How do bean plants extract it from the air? Same process?

  • @Matok1
    @Matok1 8 місяців тому

    I remember seeing a video about a type of corn that produces this slime on these 'air roots' on its stalk, and the slime slowly drips onto the soil. What is going on there is that bacteria live in the slime and they get ahold of the N2 in the air, then when dropped on the ground they metabolize the N2 and it makes it into fertilizer for the corn, kind of wild that a plant figured out how to use N2 for its fertilizer.

  • @ozzieenkees
    @ozzieenkees 8 місяців тому

    The most suprising element obviously is Ah.

  • @hamzamotara4304
    @hamzamotara4304 Місяць тому

    "Apart from Fe, obviously."
    Guy knows his audience.

  • @Joey4rox
    @Joey4rox 8 місяців тому

    N also has a poorly understood geochemistry. There are few or no mineral reservoirs in the interior, but it does substitute at trace levels in diamond. There are a few nitrate minerals at the surface but none at high pressure. In highly reduced meteorites there are nitride minerals like osbornite (TiN) and sinoite (Si2N2O).

  • @daviddelaney363
    @daviddelaney363 8 місяців тому

    Sniffing nitrogen makes your hair messy.

  • @chesswithsomi7314
    @chesswithsomi7314 7 місяців тому

    Xenone making compounds is ironic for me

  • @lisamariefan
    @lisamariefan Місяць тому

    You think the high percentage in the atmosphere and the low bioavailiability are related?
    I mean, it's common because it's hard to break.

  • @Margoth195
    @Margoth195 8 місяців тому

    not so much ironic but cool: i love that the ore you typically refine tungsten from is wolframite which is where we get the "W" symbol, and that tungsten translates to "heavy rock," which, of course, wolframite is given the typical tungsten content and tungsten's relative density.

  • @marvinkurzmanowski5645
    @marvinkurzmanowski5645 Місяць тому

    Maybe no ironic but wierd. NileRed has turned vinyl gloves into nordihyrocapsaicin

  • @FrancisFjordCupola
    @FrancisFjordCupola 2 місяці тому

    I would label iron as the most ironic element. But okay.

  • @theRationalElement
    @theRationalElement 7 місяців тому

    And Fe. Fe works fine to crack N triple bond.

  • @froggyman9588
    @froggyman9588 Місяць тому

    Is biophysics the right degree to study if I want to figure out what's up with molybdenum in bacteria?

  • @sajidrafique375
    @sajidrafique375 Місяць тому

    Lightning breaks it down

  • @still1life
    @still1life Місяць тому

    i know what the most ironic metal is !
    Galvanised iron :)

  • @ernesthill4017
    @ernesthill4017 8 місяців тому

    I don't understand how nitrogen can be the oxidizing agent in explosives 😮 compounds

  • @malikbakt
    @malikbakt 2 місяці тому

    Barrel of electrons 🤟

  • @curtrochon2732
    @curtrochon2732 Місяць тому

    Because you can only see it during the day?

  • @joswin4206
    @joswin4206 29 днів тому

    can you do a video about ozone

  • @markdavis7397
    @markdavis7397 Місяць тому

    So then I suppose Lithium is not the most lithe, Boron is not the most boring, Flourine is not the most flourishing, Silicon is not the silliest, and so on.

  • @PK_1024
    @PK_1024 7 місяців тому

    How is it ironic? Exactly because it's so stable in N2 form the atmosphere is filled with it in its stable form

  • @GiddyThis
    @GiddyThis 8 місяців тому

    You can feel it when you hyperventilate 😅

  • @ezbody
    @ezbody 8 місяців тому

    Why are we attacking nitrogen, again?

  • @ashutoshsingh3833
    @ashutoshsingh3833 15 днів тому

    Ok I understand from all the subjects Chemistry is the biggest pain in the ass

  • @ocayaro
    @ocayaro 5 днів тому

    Definitely oxygen, for me. It supports life but speeds up dying and decay.

  • @user-Mac-e9e
    @user-Mac-e9e 2 місяці тому

    আমরা নিজেরাও নাইট্রোজেন চক্রের মাধ্যমে আমাদের শরীরে N2 পাই, এটা সত্যিই খুবই কমপ্লেক্স প্রসেস।

  • @marouanejoueurdo1963
    @marouanejoueurdo1963 8 місяців тому

    nobody claimed that, like never.

  • @babyoda1973
    @babyoda1973 8 місяців тому

    Wow if we crack that the implications 😮

  • @TanmaY_TalK
    @TanmaY_TalK 7 місяців тому

    Whole organic in ironic to me

  • @creepercraftytT99
    @creepercraftytT99 17 днів тому

    isn't it iron-ic?

  • @GigaBoost
    @GigaBoost 2 місяці тому

    What about Daytrogen

  • @kikyorose6888
    @kikyorose6888 8 місяців тому

    Love your explanation on any topic. It’s described adequately for my brain to understand it with what I would like to think is pretty close to optimal efficiency…. Of course this has probably been ran by some AI as far as this subject of learning is concerned in proving that humans are not that efficient at all without some sort of technological help, you have to be one of the best… wouldn’t be surprised if you were to be an professor….. Thank you so much….

  • @BIBLEbotP
    @BIBLEbotP 8 місяців тому

    God's design is amazing

  • @murph3292
    @murph3292 2 місяці тому

    magic.

  • @notconnected3815
    @notconnected3815 8 місяців тому

    What i also find ironic about nitrogen: When it is so hard to get out of the atmosphere, then why do some agricultural areas have a problem with over-fertilization with nitrates?

    • @j.f.fisher5318
      @j.f.fisher5318 8 місяців тому +2

      Usualky because humans made the nitrates and used them stupidly. Too much of anything is bad. Though bird poo can "doo" it too.

    • @ThreeTwentysix
      @ThreeTwentysix  8 місяців тому +1

      That's because farmers use too much nitrogen-containing fertilizer (originally made using a high energy industrial process).

  • @CristinxcxzzX
    @CristinxcxzzX 2 місяці тому

    what is the most sexy element?

  • @rogermeyts5033
    @rogermeyts5033 Місяць тому

    Unobtainium

  • @rickyhenfer
    @rickyhenfer 2 місяці тому

    Richard Hammond?

  • @shukfahid
    @shukfahid 8 місяців тому

    Ironic? More like ionic.

  • @Bjowolf2
    @Bjowolf2 8 місяців тому

    Unobtainium 😉

  • @fmdj
    @fmdj 8 місяців тому

    very interesting

  • @tiltedjack9946
    @tiltedjack9946 8 місяців тому

    U can get it under pressure while doing diving
    Or just pop the nos. Whip cream I mean
    😂😂

  • @killmimes
    @killmimes 8 місяців тому

    Moly be damned

  • @ChuckSherwood-h3s
    @ChuckSherwood-h3s 25 днів тому

    I found a slither glow rod under the dirt next to A highway during a early morning freeze... Very thin..a couple centimeters long 1 half milimeter thick.. * I ate them, ha ha ha.. molecules.. bacteria 🦠..

  • @goofyloofy293
    @goofyloofy293 2 місяці тому

    Fritz Haber:

  • @peterdefrankrijker
    @peterdefrankrijker 8 місяців тому

    Why, it’s Am of course (Alanismorissettium)

  • @UserName-cb6jz
    @UserName-cb6jz 2 місяці тому

    "So complex, we are still unravelling how it works." but we're 100% sure it couldn't have been an intelligent and mighty act of creation by God.

  • @bushelfoot
    @bushelfoot Місяць тому

    And FERTILIZER

  • @YEWCHENGYINMoe
    @YEWCHENGYINMoe 8 місяців тому

    knew it

  • @amgguy4319
    @amgguy4319 9 днів тому

    Ionic or Ironic

  • @debkamalsarkar1521
    @debkamalsarkar1521 2 місяці тому

    Ohkay... I AM SUBSCRIBING

  • @codahighland
    @codahighland 8 місяців тому +1148

    Nitrogen chemistry keeps going. Not only is N2 nearly impossible to do anything with, if you can manage to get nitrogen into a compound, it usually VERY MUCH wants to go back to being N2 and will destroy whatever it needs to in order to make it happen. N2 is one of the most stable molecules, made up of two of the most reactive atoms.

    • @timothy098-b4f
      @timothy098-b4f 8 місяців тому +182

      For the same reason, nitrogen is found in most high explosives. N2 is nitrogen’s lowest energy state. Explosives are usually complex nitrogen-containing molecules, and converting them back to N2 suddenly releases all that spare energy along with a lot of other gases.

    • @Margoth195
      @Margoth195 8 місяців тому +80

      @@timothy098-b4f, that's a dynamite explanation

    • @エルフェンリート-l3i
      @エルフェンリート-l3i 8 місяців тому +88

      ​@@timothy098-b4f So what you want to tell me is that dynamite is just a giant bunch of very horny nitrogen molecules waiting for the weekday to end.

    • @dubya5626
      @dubya5626 8 місяців тому

      ​@@エルフェンリート-l3iThey don't wait. They don't bother getting a room. They don't even make it to a closet...

    • @nanamacapagal8342
      @nanamacapagal8342 8 місяців тому

      Ah yes. Free radicals. Oops
      All that effort by a bacteria to crack it open only for it to snap back into N2 and cause chaos

  • @robjohnston1433
    @robjohnston1433 8 місяців тому +400

    It's also ironic because atmospheric N2 is extremely inert, yet Nitrogen in other compounds is the basis for most major explosives!

    • @nitramreniar
      @nitramreniar 8 місяців тому +77

      While that may sound surprising at first, those two aspects of the reactivity of nitrogen are actually just two sides of the same coin.
      The reason why nitrogen compounds are such good explosives is exactly *because* the N2 molecule is so incredibly stable - there is a great gap in the energy states of basically any nitrogen compound and N2, driving those explosive reactions.

    • @andrewg.carvill4596
      @andrewg.carvill4596 8 місяців тому +35

      Basically it will blast its way through anything to link up again with another N and become N2 again.

    • @aathisankar6432
      @aathisankar6432 2 місяці тому +6

      ​@@andrewg.carvill4596 which, ironically is the best analogy for love there is.

    • @lacucaracha111111
      @lacucaracha111111 Місяць тому +3

      I mean they are linked : Nitrogen wants to be that stable REALLY BAD!
      Even if that means a bang

    • @christopherg2347
      @christopherg2347 Місяць тому +2

      Nitrogen exists in two states:
      1. So stable, it is almost as inert as a noble gas.
      2. Explosion.

  • @janAlekantuwa
    @janAlekantuwa 8 місяців тому +419

    I'd say oxygen is also pretty ironic because we can't live without it, but it creates reactive oxygen species in our cells that contribute to aging and cancer. Also, the fact that the oxygen molecule exists as a double radical despite valence bond theory suggesting it should have a double bond is also trippy

    • @ThreeTwentysix
      @ThreeTwentysix  8 місяців тому +64

      Great point!

    • @yohanaf4325
      @yohanaf4325 8 місяців тому +18

      O2 doesn't have any radicals but a double bond..?

    • @ThreeTwentysix
      @ThreeTwentysix  8 місяців тому +29

      Well spotted! Sometimes editorial compromises have to be made.

    • @theyoutuber1200
      @theyoutuber1200 8 місяців тому +36

      @@yohanaf4325 Apparently according to a popular chemical theory called 'molecular orbital theory', Oxygen has two unpaired electrons that do not pair with each other... Hence it is a radical.

    • @geo3106
      @geo3106 8 місяців тому +27

      @@theyoutuber1200It is a proven theory. It’s just that we don’t need to always refer to it for certain purposes when it’s anyways more complex than the valency/lewis structure version.

  • @jdata
    @jdata 8 місяців тому +106

    The nitrogen cycle is so crazy. The fact that we have terrestrial and aquatic cycles of nitrogen let's you know just how important it is to life.
    Edit: I would love to see you do videos on the nitrogen cycle, I feel like A LOT of info is left out by many sources explaining it as well as contemporary science just not knowing everything about it.

    • @ThreeTwentysix
      @ThreeTwentysix  8 місяців тому +15

      Added to my list!

    • @jdata
      @jdata 8 місяців тому +3

      @@ThreeTwentysix you're the best, thank you! Your video topics are always congruent with a lot of my chemistry/physics day dreams. Odd/niche topics that just don't get covered, but they also require some requisite knowledge. It's all really enjoyable.

    • @ogi22
      @ogi22 8 місяців тому +1

      @@ThreeTwentysix I've said it before and I will say it again. I just LOVE your chemist perspective! I'm a physics nerd and it is amazing to see things from different angles. 💕

  • @bide2505
    @bide2505 8 місяців тому +47

    Iron being not the most ironic element is the real irony here 😮

    • @yonimaor1005
      @yonimaor1005 2 місяці тому +1

      ... So it is the most Ironic because it is not?!

    • @avadakedavra80
      @avadakedavra80 2 місяці тому +3

      He wrote in the first few frames:
      “Apart from fe obviously”

    • @shaibusezuo5560
      @shaibusezuo5560 Місяць тому

      ​@@yonimaor1005😂😂😂😂😂

  • @younscrafter7372
    @younscrafter7372 8 місяців тому +17

    Did a presentation on Haber Bosch recently. This took up two entire slides and a short video