I have a question for John mirchheimer. If he was elected president would he be able to fight the Israel lobby or would he have to be pressured to do what they want also?
I will put it this way. if lran has those balistic buties in like hundreds of thousands then there is not way in hell "israel" or the USA have a chance but if they don't really have a good stock pile of those missiles then I hope Iran thinks more than 2 times before do anything. on the 1st of October we all saw how good thoese missiles are but the question is if all war breaks out how many they have and for how long they can fight, because if those missiles runout then good luck to lran
From my limited observation Iran is more honest and just , so I think beware they claim to have missiles more powerful than Nuclear, where did Russia get the Oreshnick from ?
@@carlscharenguivel2565 Maybe or maybe not. We are not talking about nuk3s and lets hope no one usese those weapons ever agian. However lran should have those balistic missiles in a very good amount of stocks. Lets be honest, on the 1st of October everyone around the world was impressed and shocked how good those missiles actully are. lran can easly win the fight by litrally just using those missiles but it all depends on how many they have.
All the professor’s predictions in the last year proved to be wrong, and now he is ignoring two basic facts: A. The religious factor. B. The tribal structure of the Muslim society.
It is an absolute nonsense that if Iran gets a nuclear weapon then others in the region will deploy a nuclear deterrent. Iran is being warred with for 45 years with at least economic sanctions. It is a historic Sovereign nation, Saudi Arabia is not. The Arabian Peninsula, if and when united into a one Arabia may wish to adopt a nuclear posture, but to imagine an Iraq pursuing one is conjecture like it is for Saudi Arabia . Turkey as part of NATO simply has no need to deploy a nuclear deterrent. The only nation in West Asia being threatened by other nuclear powers is Iran. For Iran it is not a choice, it is imperative. The fact that as yet it has not simply means that it cannot yet and any suggestion of the Khamenei Edict should be discarded as a factor somehow over ruling the imperative. The regime's Primary Directive is self preservation over everything and anything including guarding the Iranian interest for the entrapped population who are justifiably angry. The regime knows that actually making a useable nuclear bomb means marrying it to one or more of its missile systems - this takes time and leaves a footprint - during such a time, Iran will be assuredly attacked by the U.S in an effort to stop the process and the raining U.S missiles and sorties will signal a population at the end of its tether to rise and bring it down - THAT IS WHY IRAN has not deployed a nuclear deterrent. The U.S could attack now and expect the same population uprising, but then it knows that the Iranian Regime will destroy the oil facilities of the region before being ousted, and that will be self defeating.
Iran kept talking about the axis of resistance, I'm asking what are they resisting cause Israel have been wiping the floor with them whenever they want.
@@ottonormalo4638 And Iranian regime wouldn't be talking tough without the Russians help, even with that, you could see how the Israelis took them and theirs alies to the cleaners.
What rubbish. Palestinians are free of Hamas, Lebanese are free of Hezbollah while Syrians are overjoyed to be rid of the Assad 54 year dictatorship. Btw the Iranian people want their theocratic regime gone. Can we agree on that?
And the world wants to be free of the Zionazi Elders. Hamaz still rules Gasa, Syria is now in the hands if lSlS and Al Qaida and more than half of lranians approve of their government
Iran deserves respect for acting in a wise and pationt conduct.
So if Israel has nukes, its not scary. If Iran ALSO has the ability to defend themselves with nukes, then its scary. He showed his hand right there.
No dummy. What's scary is both having them. Plus the other countries.
@@fabiansandoval6132 I'm giving you both a thumbs up...but I think you miss cjview's valid point.
From Kissinger to Wolfawitz and beyond the infiltration is at the highest peak
States don't think, humans do.
Professor Brilliant
Thanks!
Very interesting thanks
As long as the Palestineans remain in these " extremely difficult conditions" lives would continue to be lost. It is unfortunate.
I have a question for John mirchheimer. If he was elected president would he be able to fight the Israel lobby or would he have to be pressured to do what they want also?
Can You even Believe this has happened ...
Americans,BAMBOOZLED BEHIND OUR BACKS
I think Iran is the only adult in this war game.
🇺🇦🐾🦘🐨🦘🐾🇵🇸
Go for eye for an eye.
man .iran said we dont want bomb.why dont you understand that?????
Us dont prefer israil to iran
iran is much imortant
I will put it this way. if lran has those balistic buties in like hundreds of thousands then there is not way in hell "israel" or the USA have a chance but if they don't really have a good stock pile of those missiles then I hope Iran thinks more than 2 times before do anything. on the 1st of October we all saw how good thoese missiles are but the question is if all war breaks out how many they have and for how long they can fight, because if those missiles runout then good luck to lran
From my limited observation Iran is more honest and just , so I think beware they claim to have missiles more powerful than Nuclear, where did Russia get the Oreshnick from ?
@@carlscharenguivel2565 Maybe or maybe not. We are not talking about nuk3s and lets hope no one usese those weapons ever agian. However lran should have those balistic missiles in a very good amount of stocks. Lets be honest, on the 1st of October everyone around the world was impressed and shocked how good those missiles actully are. lran can easly win the fight by litrally just using those missiles but it all depends on how many they have.
@@zabiarayyan7056 tey have more than 3000 ballistic search google
we dont know how much tey have but sure usa cant defeat iran in arab world fight
lran has the largest stock of missiles and drones in the middle east
We see hypocrisy in him.He hide it good.He one sided and truth not in him.
I see the majority of the world agrees with him, even in the U.S
Why is Iran in conflict with Israel to begin with?
Al aqsa mosque
All the professor’s predictions in the last year proved to be wrong, and now he is ignoring two basic facts: A. The religious factor. B. The tribal structure of the Muslim society.
Oh shut up .
Well, that’s an argument…@@BlueZola
"The tribal structure of the Muslim society" You making a blanket statement about a billion people. Absolute nonsense.
Almost two billion, spread across dozens of countries and cultures. Makes the point even more nonsensical.
Just more Isreal propaganda
Not true… btw
Zio bot hired to spread bs Isrealis being Isrealis Fake and liars
Oh stop… ! Stupid
It’s Israel that is daring Iran, not the other way around.
It is an absolute nonsense that if Iran gets a nuclear weapon then others in the region will deploy a nuclear deterrent. Iran is being warred with for 45 years with at least economic sanctions. It is a historic Sovereign nation, Saudi Arabia is not. The Arabian Peninsula, if and when united into a one Arabia may wish to adopt a nuclear posture, but to imagine an Iraq pursuing one is conjecture like it is for Saudi Arabia . Turkey as part of NATO simply has no need to deploy a nuclear deterrent. The only nation in West Asia being threatened by other nuclear powers is Iran. For Iran it is not a choice, it is imperative. The fact that as yet it has not simply means that it cannot yet and any suggestion of the Khamenei Edict should be discarded as a factor somehow over ruling the imperative. The regime's Primary Directive is self preservation over everything and anything including guarding the Iranian interest for the entrapped population who are justifiably angry. The regime knows that actually making a useable nuclear bomb means marrying it to one or more of its missile systems - this takes time and leaves a footprint - during such a time, Iran will be assuredly attacked by the U.S in an effort to stop the process and the raining U.S missiles and sorties will signal a population at the end of its tether to rise and bring it down - THAT IS WHY IRAN has not deployed a nuclear deterrent. The U.S could attack now and expect the same population uprising, but then it knows that the Iranian Regime will destroy the oil facilities of the region before being ousted, and that will be self defeating.
Iran kept talking about the axis of resistance, I'm asking what are they resisting cause Israel have been wiping the floor with them whenever they want.
Israel would not be anything without US help.
You talk rubbish.
@@ottonormalo4638
And Iranian regime wouldn't be talking tough without the Russians help, even with that, you could see how the Israelis took them and theirs alies to the cleaners.
This is deranged. Iran has lost in Gaza, Lebanon and Syria.
You are delusional. Iran is weak
What rubbish. Palestinians are free of Hamas, Lebanese are free of Hezbollah while Syrians are overjoyed to be rid of the Assad 54 year dictatorship. Btw the Iranian people want their theocratic regime gone. Can we agree on that?
And the world wants to be free of the Zionazi Elders.
Hamaz still rules Gasa, Syria is now in the hands if lSlS and Al Qaida and more than half of lranians approve of their government