How an Orphan Became Italy's Richest Man

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 чер 2024
  • To try everything Brilliant has to offer for free for a full 30 days, visit www.brilliant.org/howhistoryworks. You’ll also get 20% off an annual premium subscription.
    -------
    Sign up for my FREE newsletter! - www.compoundeddaily.com/
    ------
    #business #History #entrepreneur
    Link To Our Other Channel: / howmoneyworks
    Written By: Sam
    Video Created By:
    Svibe Multimedia Studio
    Editor: Cardan
    Media Gatherer: Andrea Rivas
    Footage Courtesy of: Getty Images
    Music Provided By: Epidemic Sound
    For sponsorship inquiries, please contact sponsors@worksmedia.group
    -----
    Leonardo Del Vecchio turned eyewear from archaic medical devices into a must-
    have fashion accessory.
    By the time he died at 87 years old, he’d created an entire monopoly through his
    parent company, Luxottica, and had accumulated a net worth of $21.9B. [1]
    And it all started with a tiny workshop in a quiet Italian town.
    He owned companies like Ray-Bans, licensing deals with Gucci, and health
    insurance infrastructure like EyeMed. [2]
    However, some say his market share is an optical illusion.
    Only 10% of global sales are from Luxottica. Apparently, his crossover with luxury
    brands is what makes us think he was a bigger player than he actually was.
    Then again, critics point to the mountain of evidence which suggests his vertically
    integrated conglomerate controlled the market on so many levels that they could
    get away with jacking up the prices.
    Not only was he the guy that made sunglasses cool, he was also the guy that made
    sunglasses expensive.
    Leonardo may have had skills to get hired, but he didn’t have their respect to get
    noticed.
    But he didn’t care so long as he got his pay check.
    300 Lira wasn’t enough to strike it out on his own, it was barely enough to get by,
    but by squirrelling it away he’d save enough to study engraving at the Brera
    Academy of Art.
    By the time he graduated with that diploma he was out of institutions and on his
    own.
    Thankfully he had everything he needed to stake his fortune: passion, skills, and
    hardship.
    All he needed now was a way to focus these onto a singular vision. So he set out to
    the North of Italy to find it.
    It’s time to learn how history works as we look into the life story of Leonard Del
    Vecchio.
    SOURCES
    1. www.forbes.com/profile/leonar...
    2. www.cascade.app/studies/luxot...
    3. www.lemonde.fr/en/obituaries/...
    vecchio-italian-billionaire-and-founder-of-luxottica-dies-at-
    87_5988644_15.html
    4. www.childrenshomes.org.uk/Mil...
    5. • Leonardo Del Vecchio: ...
    6. www.theguardian.com/news/2018...
    big-glasses-eyewear-industry-essilor-luxottica
    7. www.essilorluxottica.com/en/n...
    licensing-renewal-armani/
    8. www.essilorluxottica.com/en/n...
    licensing-renewal-armani/
    9. money.cnn.com/2001/02/22/deal...
    10. • Corporate Consolidatio...
    11. www.nytimes.com/2022/06/27/wo...
    dead.html

КОМЕНТАРІ • 39

  • @HowHistoryWorks
    @HowHistoryWorks  24 дні тому +3

    To try everything Brilliant has to offer for free for a full 30 days, visit www.brilliant.org/howhistoryworks. You’ll also get 20% off an annual premium subscription.

  • @H.LeonideSouza
    @H.LeonideSouza 24 дні тому +38

    Crazy, it is always cool to see history of people that actually became self made successful

    • @mwilamakwaya95
      @mwilamakwaya95 8 днів тому +2

      But we criticise our own (in our time)when they do the same.

    • @mjbaricua7403
      @mjbaricua7403 2 дні тому +1

      ​@@mwilamakwaya95our own "self-made" are liars who try to emulate the real ones

  • @Sythemn
    @Sythemn 23 дні тому +10

    Man, I think it's been 20 years since I saw Felix the Cat.

  • @user-wz9uz6uv8x
    @user-wz9uz6uv8x 23 дні тому +1

    Keep it up! Much appreciated content.

  • @lordlynkz
    @lordlynkz 23 дні тому +3

    This was actually more depressing than I was prepared for lol. It's like older generations were just absolutely awful to one another, sheesh. They trauma dump by taking it out on each other and future generations

  • @quasinfinity
    @quasinfinity 23 дні тому +5

    This is why I wear lame safety glasses. So glad I don't need prescriptions.

  • @kyootzee
    @kyootzee 23 дні тому +2

    He grew up in a world where people did not care about him, so he had no reason to care about people. Only way to get respect was to get wealthy, so that's what he did. If you can't afford glasses you need to see properly, not his problem.

  • @Hobnobble
    @Hobnobble 24 дні тому +12

    I just returned two pair of glasses to Costco of all places, because they were pealing after only a few months. For $20 & $25 each. I still own cheap sunglasses I bought in 2010. The industry is completely broken thanks to this one man. The only place left to get good sunglasses (that actually protect your eyes from the sun) for a decent price is to look at the safety glasses industry, but they you gotta get the super-bro wrap around style since they have a shatter/impact rating.

  • @firenter
    @firenter 23 дні тому +1

    Wow, that's a lot of puns per minute!

  • @giangargo669
    @giangargo669 23 дні тому +1

    kind of cool and kind of sad, still we are not forced to buy 800 dollars glasses

  • @gavinshickle1814
    @gavinshickle1814 23 дні тому +10

    At the end of the day no one was forced to pay $800 for sunglasses. People willingly payed that asking price. While I won't say he was a saint, it really falls on the consumer and the fact that enough people were willing to pay that asking price for something they don't actually need.

    • @philoslother4602
      @philoslother4602 23 дні тому +1

      Still a monopoly, a fashion brand monopoly is still a monopoly

    • @Dave-um7mw
      @Dave-um7mw 21 день тому

      My wife needed prescription glasses a while back. Sure, we weren't forced to pay almost $500 for them. We also had the option to pay almost $700 for them.

    • @gavinshickle1814
      @gavinshickle1814 21 день тому

      @@philoslother4602 Which doesn't change what I said because I didn't say they weren't engaged in monopolistic practices.

    • @gavinshickle1814
      @gavinshickle1814 21 день тому

      @@Dave-um7mw So you got screwed by other people who were willing to pay outrageous prices for something they didn't need.

    • @Dave-um7mw
      @Dave-um7mw 20 днів тому

      @@gavinshickle1814 you said Luxottica engages in monopolistic practices. The monopoly removes the choice, and therefore the responsibility from customers. We got screwed by the monopoly, not the others who also got screwed by it.

  • @Dave-um7mw
    @Dave-um7mw 21 день тому

    Imagine if Microsoft bought out Dell, Nvidia, and Intel. Now you have Luxottica.

  • @luchain771
    @luchain771 24 дні тому +3

    Why don't big tech multinationals vertically integrate by mining their own Silicon and rare earth metals, transport everything, bank for themselves and manufacture for themselves as well as having all the software for themselves which they would have on devices that they made almost completely by themselves?

    • @viewer-of-content
      @viewer-of-content 24 дні тому +8

      because many rare earth materials are super common, but toxic to process. liabilities often outweigh profits. shoving costs onto money loosing government subsidized shell companies is the go to strategy

    • @pif5023
      @pif5023 23 дні тому +3

      I am pretty sure Apple already thought about that

    • @antoniocampen
      @antoniocampen 23 дні тому +1

      The biggest production and deposits of both silicon and rare earth metals are in china. China is not about to let some american companies buy its most strategic resources. Chip production is more feasable but it takes decades to set up and its probably not worth it if you have to pay the workers an extremely high american salary. And then theres the fact that tech companies dont really want to get much bigger so the government doesnt break them up for being monopolies.

    • @georgerogers1166
      @georgerogers1166 23 дні тому

      Costs of vertical integration.

    • @Dave-um7mw
      @Dave-um7mw 21 день тому

      They will one day.

  • @MCorpReview
    @MCorpReview 20 днів тому

    They r like Louis Vuitton of glasses.😊

  • @sharma_anish
    @sharma_anish 24 дні тому +2

    Looking forward to a great video! - First?!

  • @taln0reich
    @taln0reich 24 дні тому

    well, I guess I'm third.

  • @deusexmachina4784
    @deusexmachina4784 24 дні тому +2

    amongst the first. Very cool

  • @gileswilliams3014
    @gileswilliams3014 24 дні тому

    Pioneer

  • @dkaoboy
    @dkaoboy 23 дні тому +1

    I rock a pair of Kirkland eyeglasses. and I'm worth 4 million dollars. So those who spend $200 on sunglasses, you're all losers. Unless you have more money than me, then... you do you.