Mr Filmy should have just stayed out of the street. He then would have kept the focus on the other two clowns. He was winning, but couldn't control his emotions.
Phoenix Jones is a known domestic abuser and overall terrible human being, so I would actually really love to see a video about him from a legal perspective, especially from one of my favorite channels on UA-cam!
Although civil cases are very different from criminal ones and people have won cases they perhaps should not have won. But I think this would have gone nowhere.
@@dontknow3949 Real question is, why was this guy so concerned about being recorded? Was he planning on committing a crime even with his family right there? What did he have to hide? It's not like his sole focus was on recording them. They just happened to be within proximity to this guy. I don't see the point of coming up to him and talking such a big game if he had no intention of doing any of it. Instead he called the police in which case he never even needed to engage in any way. What a colossal waste of time.
@@bigkrazykag5428I am not necessarily defending the guy asking questions about the video, But it does strike me as odd that so many of you are defending him? As a father of 2 myself, I do find it a little strange that someone would want to just walk around and record me and my family (esp my children) I just think it's invasive and it's unnecessary. Also, fwiw - why Doesn't the narrator explain to us The difference between Stand Your Ground and mutual combat? They are two very different things so it's not as if the vlogger was illegal expert either right?
I do get it... It's not illegal to film in public, it's also not illegal to be a complete asshole...but it doesn't mean it's a great idea to go be one though, does it?
Several amendments to the U.S. Constitution provide a foundation for privacy rights, particularly through their interpretations by the courts. Here are the key amendments that help with privacy laws in the United States: 1. Fourth Amendment Text: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Privacy Protections: The Fourth Amendment is the primary constitutional provision protecting individuals' privacy. It establishes the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, requiring that any search or seizure be conducted with a warrant based on probable cause. This has been interpreted to mean that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their homes, personal belongings, and even their digital data. Key Cases: Katz v. United States (1967): Established the "reasonable expectation of privacy" standard. Riley v. California (2014): Required warrants to search cell phones during an arrest. Carpenter v. United States (2018): Required a warrant to access historical cell phone location data. 2. First Amendment Text: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." Privacy Protections: While the First Amendment is primarily known for protecting freedoms of speech, religion, and assembly, it also implicitly supports privacy. The right to free association, for example, has been interpreted to mean that people have the right to privacy in their associations and beliefs. The government cannot require disclosure of membership lists of groups or monitor lawful private activities without just cause. Key Cases: NAACP v. Alabama (1958): Protected the privacy of NAACP membership lists from state government scrutiny, supporting freedom of association. 3. Third Amendment Text: "No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law." Privacy Protections: Though rarely invoked in modern legal contexts, the Third Amendment reflects the constitutional commitment to the privacy of the home. It prohibits the government from placing soldiers in private homes without consent, underscoring the principle that individuals should be free from unwarranted government intrusion into their private lives and properties. Key Cases: The Third Amendment has not been the basis for major privacy litigation, but it has been cited in discussions about the right to privacy. 4. Fifth Amendment Text: "No person shall be...compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." Privacy Protections: The Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination ("pleading the Fifth") has been interpreted to support the right to privacy concerning personal information. The amendment prevents individuals from being forced to disclose personal information that could be used against them in criminal cases. The "due process" clause also provides a basis for arguing for privacy rights in legal proceedings. Key Cases: Miranda v. Arizona (1966): Strengthened the right against self-incrimination, contributing to privacy rights by requiring police to inform suspects of their rights, including the right to remain silent. 5. Ninth Amendment Text: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." Privacy Protections: The Ninth Amendment acknowledges that the people have rights beyond those explicitly listed in the Constitution. This has been interpreted by the courts to suggest a broad, general right to privacy that encompasses various aspects of personal autonomy and freedom from government intrusion. Key Cases: Griswold v. Connecticut (1965): Recognized a right to privacy in marital relations, stating that the specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights have "penumbras," or implied rights, that create zones of privacy. 6. Fourteenth Amendment Text: "No state shall...deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Privacy Protections: The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment has been used to extend the protection of privacy rights against state actions. The Supreme Court has interpreted this clause to protect various aspects of personal autonomy, including rights related to family, marriage, and reproductive decisions. Key Cases: Roe v. Wade (1973): Recognized a woman's right to privacy in making decisions about abortion. Lawrence v. Texas (2003): Struck down laws criminalizing private, consensual homosexual activity, recognizing privacy rights regarding intimate conduct. Obergefell v. Hodges (2015): Recognized the right to marry as a fundamental liberty under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses, reinforcing privacy in personal relationships. Conclusion These amendments form the constitutional basis for privacy rights in the United States. They reflect a commitment to protecting individuals' privacy and freedom from unwarranted governmental interference, a principle that continues to be interpreted and defined through judicial decisions.
I mean...sometimes your trying to eat or your waiting for a family member to meet you. I guess just accept society being a joke with no punchline and allow the mayhem 😂 I have accepted this aspect but...what a circus.
Just imagine if he hadn't been a "tough guy" right off the bat. "Hey man, I see you recording and that's cool. Any chance I could get you to blur my kids faces while you are editing? I'd appreciate it. What's your channel name? I wanna check it out."
@@Master_Yoda1990 § 22-404. DC. Assault or threatened assault in a menacing manner; stalking. (a)(1) Whoever unlawfully assaults, or threatens another in a menacing manner, shall be fined not more than the amount set forth in § 22-3571.01 or be imprisoned not more than 180 days, or both. (2) Whoever unlawfully assaults, or threatens another in a menacing manner, and intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly causes significant bodily injury to another shall be fined not more than the amount set forth in § 22-3571.01 or be imprisoned not more than 3 years, or both.
Its cute that americans believe they are "rights" They are privileges period. No such thing as rights because if they were rights this country would be the exact same as it was in 1880. Its not though because the government has been amending and completely taking rights away for centuries now. Rights can't be taken away. Yet thoussnds of americans have their rights taken away for simple drug crimes every day. Lol rights. You mean privileges
Second guy out of the car was hilarious. Trying to act tough with the LEST intimidating sounding voice ever 🤣. Sounding like he lives with SpongeBob. Then proceeding to do the same thing he has an issue with. Dude is gonna get hurt one day for sure.
@xXLogicXx Pretty wild that, in the centuries during which they have existed, SCotUS has not yet seen fit to strike pedestrian laws from the books. Go figure! ;)
The first thing these bozos say is there are kids in the car. Then they proceed to traumatize their kids by refusing to simply drive away. They never cared about the best interest of their kids. They were just responding violently to their bruised ego, kids be damned. SMH.
You see unstable irresponsible adults do that a lot. They proceed to start a physical altercation with someone based on the fact that their kids are with them when there’s no physical threat in the first place. And who the fuck cares is some stranger films you as you drive out of a park. Everyone has a camera in their pockets these days it’s nothing special lol.
This. I most likely would have punched the guy in the chin, throat, plexus, or ribs before he got that close and hope for the best. Probably stupid though because most people are pussies and this dude didn't want that smoke, he just wanted to make a scene for his ego.
@@loganthesaint ...or your knife is not a weapon, and you live in a civilized society, so there's no reason to hide it, and you never expected to use it as a weapon...
We should bring back HS education that actually teaches about your rights, and the things in life that will actually help you like managing your finances, gardening, trades, etc.
This dude obviously didn’t take his ccw class serious, you’re supposed to forget your ego, and avoid situations all together, you’re gun and knife is only to defend yourself. Not start a fight with someone!
@sheepdawwg It was way longer than 2 seconds. In fact, it was 25 seconds EXACTLY from when they 1st told him to get out of the street to the point that they cuffed him. Stop defending idiots like this "auditor". The cops were literally on his side until he decided to start being a dick and purposefully antagonizing the cops and giving them a legitimate reason to cuff him.
Anyone else finding it odd he even recorded a man with children in his car? While also wearing a mask? Sure no physical threat is present but it’s still highly suspect
Why do these yahoos keep expecting privacy out in public? Know the real reason why they were angry, scared they would be recorded hitting their meth pipe
It would be funny if it wasnt so moronic. If that thug would have looked around he would have seen cameras EVERYWHERE. You cant be in public without being recorded, so claiming a right to privacy inside a car with windows on a street or parking lot is beyond stupid.
@@bmanagement4657 the police could care less fashie,Biden is coercing companies,employers,and schools to mandate it..you lose,thanks for playing fashie
That guy must have gone through police training *menacingly approach innocent civilian *declare "I feel threatened" *threaten to assault innocent civilian and claim it would be self defense
You forgot a bullet... *actually assaults innocent civilians after threatening *innocent civilians get charged with crimes while officers looks for more victims.
Exactly, like I don't know how anybody is on that guy's side. He sounds like such a cornball using the word "disengage" to describe every action as if he's a fucking soldier or something. Like yeah, man it's legal for you to film in public, but do you think people are going to like being filmed by some random guy as they go about their day? Doesn't matter to this guy as long as the law told him he can do it. Guys like this are even dumber than the people they try to mock for not knowing laws. I do like when they expose stupid cops, but I also feel like 90% of the guys who do this are just looking for an argument because they have nothing better to do.
Please forgive my ignorance, but do you know what the guy is supposed to be auditing? Surely he isn't doing his job correctly unless he's supposed to be auditing random people on the street.
@@jeffalbillar7625 indeed, it appears to me that he the man in the hat politely asked him not to film, the male Karen soyboy immediately started screeching, interrupting the other man, who was speaking the entire time in a firm, but calm tone of voice. Fuck these frauditors.
@@everinghall8622 I wouldn't say that about all of them. They are doing something that should be done by a government office. But the idiot in this video is being a prick
"he walked up to my car and started recording my kids". "He got his camera all in my face." Dawg, you got out of your car. Left your children in danger , and walked up to this stranger and got confrontational. Wtf 🤣
Actually he asked him politely to not record him, then this guy who probably looks like the soy Jack meme immediately cut him off and yelled at him. Legal or not, that isn't the way we behave in polite society, and legally he should be totally fine with punching this guy in the face as soon as he pointed the pepper spray at him. The camera guy was looking for a fight this whole time.
What? How did he leave his children in danger? I think you should rewatch this the auditor or whatever was the one who got confrontational. This man initially asked very nicely. I think in the very least people should have to blur any children in footage where they do not have permission from the parents to post online. It's a reasonable exception to allow people's first amendment rights to stay intact and a valid way to address concerns of parents of strangers filming their children.
@Johannes Fiftyeight Why bother having state laws then? Driver's licences are issued by the state and administered state law. Why hasn't any sovtard won their case in court and allowed to driver without a licence?
Actually I do believe there are laws against filming underage kids without their Express consent. I remember when a film crew came to my school and we got a paper to sign saying whether or not we consented to being recorded
Auditor seemed disappointed cops were reasonably enforcing the law and deescalating the situation. As an "auditor," he should have been pleased with the outcome, but instead openly antagonized the officers for no reason.
for sum thts what it really is; there's the Real 1s who r Knights protectin us from the sherrif's of nuttingham, n they r doin it to make change n not just to start ish, but those r like 1 or 2 maybe rn. i thought one of these guys tht audits canadian cops was cool, but he ain't, it's not about rights n laws n makin the cops honour them, i guess, if yer not from his demographic, as i found him to be by some of his comments to me. told me i should close my blinds when i mentioned cops doing Absolutely nothing about someone flying n hovering a drone 3ft off my highrise balcony outside my living room window. it's an indictable offence, but the cops refused to properly investigate so i didn have an adress to send papers to for court. i was denied the right to due process of the law by cops n the guy didn think it a big deal n told me to "close my blinds" n "it's not illegal" i was stickin up for him on one of his other posts when someone was calling him a "frauditor"..... now i agree with the person. some of them r just the same as the wak jobs that cause trouble n do stupid pranx for clix n likes.
What happens in mutual combat if you choke someone out ,then continue to beat their uncocious body for 45 minutes straight?? Cause that would be my strategy
NC Tyrant Hunter practices is his first and second amendment right when he films. People that have a problem with him filming approach him very cautiously once they see what's on his side. ... J
Someone should probably arrest him for being a threat to the public, then, if he'd shoot someone for asking not to be recorded. You auditors aren't helping the community at all. You're harassers and abusers, far worse than the police.
US code 18 section 241/ 242 Deprivation of rights under the color of law ... You have all the right to photograph/ videotaping on and in PUBLIC property and BUILDINGS, even the right from public film into private property and buildings., filming in government buildings ( include staff and visitors and minors ) is include the 1st amendment -- freedom of press ... 4th amendment -- NO RAS/ NO probable cause of a CRIME = NO ID ... Nobody can TRESPASS/ DETAIN/ ID or ARREST you from/ on PUBLIC property whiteout RAS/ Probable cause of a CRIME … there is NO privacy in public ... IGNORANCE of the law is NO ex
The auditor needs to calm down. He won. Coos showed up and did exactly the correct thing. He could have stayed calm and let the police explain to the guys the law, thanked the officers and it would have been a great video. Instead he walked into the street and well... ya. Some guys do 1a audits much better than others.
Most of these auditors are jackasses that tarnish the names of their constituents. They tell the officers to act in a professional and cordial manner yet they do not practice what they preach.
@@KingZealotTactics I get it in some capacity. But your correct. Telling someone "be professional you piece of shit" never worked at any point in time with any person. I see a handful of auiditors that set the example though. Props to those people.
@@KingZealotTactics how wrong can you be. Nowhere in the constitution does it say that you have to be professional but an officer on the other hand is one he’s on the job in to he takes an oath to defend the law. Defending the law is respecting the law
Hey I'm winning the argument between the cops and the two attackers. This feels too satisfying... I'm gonna go stand in the street filming the cop car, and be as annoying as possible so the tables turn on me. 😐
@@tramarthomas6105 If you don't want to exercise your rights that's your prerogative, but you don't get to tell anyone else that they can't, regardless of how annoying you think they are.
@@proudboricuaclone9676 yeah. As ridiculous as that sounds. Colorado is a mandatory flight state. You're only allowed to use as much force as required to escape. It's stupid.
Only two states out of the entire United States have legalized mutual combat, namely Washington and Texas. Both require a police officer to oversee the fight to ensure no bystanders get hurt, and to break up the fight when an evident victor emerges.
“They may not be there to bail him out” He didn’t call them. He didn’t ask to be bailed out. The mutual combat coward and the knife twatwaffle are the ones who needed daddy to take care of their problems for them.
*You're analysis late in the video is very misguided. Not sure about that state but "pedestrian in the roadway" is usually a CIVIL INFRACTION at most if it's against the law at all. Typically those laws apply to pedestrians WALKING along the road and are typically required to walk along the shoulder, off the roadway and against the flow of traffic. Failure to do so is a NON-CRIMINAL infraction. As a retired LEO myself you can only go "HANDS ON" to affect and arrest (not happening here) OR for riot/crowd control. Outside of those instances if a LEO puts hands on and it's not to make an arrest, prevent someone from intentionally harming themselves or crowd control it falls in the category of ASSAULT & BATTERY because they didn't have a lawful reason to get physical. A who's legally parked along the edge of a roadway (like those cops) needs to get in/out of their vehicle meaning someone MUST walk into the roadway to get access. If the driver of said car can legally ingress/egress from a legally parked vehicle then by simple logic a regular pedestrian may also walk up to the driver's door of that vehicle to record the interior. The auditor can lawfully walk into the road to approach the driver's door no differently than the driver himself can walk into the road to access the vehicle. That right IS NOT exclusive to the vehicle driver but anyone. That act alone IS NOT in and of itself unlawful.*
Lil buddy that hopped out trying to act tough really made me laugh who did he think he was intimidating with his voice on the verge of cracking with every threat lmao
For real even the auditor is a douche 😂. He sounds like a failed law student that is dying to show off what he knows about the law. Then the other 2 were morons specially the dude leaving his kids unattended in the car.
They also misunderstand the locus of self-defense. Even without considering the knife in this situation, the two approaches are the initiators of the incident. This means that they are engaged in a crime and have thus forfeited their right to use self-defense as an affirmative defense. i.e. One robs a store. The teller pulls out a shotgun and the robber shoots the teller. The robber is charged with murder. In court, he pleads self-defense arguing that, because the teller threatened him with a gun he was in fear for his life. This plea will be dismissed because the robber was in the process of committing another crime and initiated the threatening situation, to begin with. It is the same with these guys. They initiated the incident, the auditor has the "right of way," so to speak, for the purposes of the self-defense claim.
Yeah, just by initiating first contact by approaching him. Is engaging a confrontation! Therefore no self defense case would apply, especially since they were together. Meaning unless he had a lethal weapon, they can't play victim as if they were in fear of their lives bcuz of mace! Especially when dudes holding a fucking camera!
Would have been hilarious if the camera guy said "Sure!" When asked to mutual combat and dude was up on him,then instantly emptied the bear spray in his face!!! 🤣
@@AndrewF321 Yes. I can agree with that. I'm open minded. Of course I'm sure you are open minded enough to see this? www.theonion.com/insecure-frustrated-bully-with-something-to-prove-cons-1819575405
The auditor channel Amagansett Press. When people walk up to him saying "don't film me". He asks them "If you don't want to be filmed why did you walk up to the camera?
IF it's MUTUAL consent... not a way for bullies to assault people and then claim "mutual combat!" Want mutual combat? Go to a gym and have your combat in a ring with refs.
We usually just ask “you wanna fight about it”? Then fight about it somewhere appropriate. Mutual combat lmao. Sounds like the woke version of mortal combat
Guys a troll. Tempting others to break the law so he can be a victim. Some will say he’s flexing his right to record in public. The guy is clearly looking for trouble, then mad when he finds it. 🤷♂️
The auditor did ok until the whole walking in the road thing. I can understand why the officers had an issue with that. They were doing a fair job with the guy who had the issue and as an auditor, he should be celebrating that and not just making drama for UA-cam videos to try and make out they were out of order
Tackling him? These police officers were extremely patient with this guy and there was no "tackling" that took place. 10/10 for the officer response. The auditor's performance 100% merited detainment after he walked on the street as if his camera gave him jackass super powers against the authority of the officers conducting their investigation.
I could never understand how people make claims of knowing something that they clearly did not study? How do you say "it's illegal to film me" when 1. You've never read this. 2. It's false. 3. The law clearly defines the legality of recording in public spaces It just makes no sense. It's almost like someone who has never read an iota about genetics trying to tell you that babies are born in the clouds when you've been reading about genetics all your life. It's really disturbing.
I FeEL ThReaTEnEd!! As he's waking closer to him. Lol
Lol fr tho smh
Must be a cop
He’s saying that so he can fight him
Isn't that what frauditors always say when someone gets close to them?
"My ego feels threatened..." there I fixed it!
He wasn't breaking a law until the idiot walked into the roadway
"mUtUaL cOmBaT" xDDDD. So glad the US is only in the US
Did y’all not hear the second guy say the N word like it was nothing?
Mr Filmy should have just stayed out of the street. He then would have kept the focus on the other two clowns. He was winning, but couldn't control his emotions.
Man film the cops all ya want but leave the liquor and weed stores alone man
Phoenix Jones is a known domestic abuser and overall terrible human being, so I would actually really love to see a video about him from a legal perspective, especially from one of my favorite channels on UA-cam!
"If you post this I can sue you." You can sue anybody. You just won't win.
😂 and will be broke.
Although civil cases are very different from criminal ones and people have won cases they perhaps should not have won. But I think this would have gone nowhere.
@@dontknow3949 Real question is, why was this guy so concerned about being recorded? Was he planning on committing a crime even with his family right there? What did he have to hide? It's not like his sole focus was on recording them. They just happened to be within proximity to this guy. I don't see the point of coming up to him and talking such a big game if he had no intention of doing any of it. Instead he called the police in which case he never even needed to engage in any way. What a colossal waste of time.
@@bigkrazykag5428I am not necessarily defending the guy asking questions about the video, But it does strike me as odd that so many of you are defending him? As a
father of 2 myself, I do find it a little strange that someone would want to just walk around and record me and my family (esp my children) I just think it's invasive and it's unnecessary.
Also, fwiw - why Doesn't the narrator explain to us The difference between Stand Your Ground and mutual combat? They are two very different things so it's not as if the vlogger was illegal expert either right?
I do get it... It's not illegal to film in public, it's also not illegal to be a complete asshole...but it doesn't mean it's a great idea to go be one though, does it?
‘Expectation of privacy in public’…..um no.
Several amendments to the U.S. Constitution provide a foundation for privacy rights, particularly through their interpretations by the courts. Here are the key amendments that help with privacy laws in the United States:
1. Fourth Amendment
Text: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Privacy Protections: The Fourth Amendment is the primary constitutional provision protecting individuals' privacy. It establishes the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, requiring that any search or seizure be conducted with a warrant based on probable cause. This has been interpreted to mean that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their homes, personal belongings, and even their digital data.
Key Cases:
Katz v. United States (1967): Established the "reasonable expectation of privacy" standard.
Riley v. California (2014): Required warrants to search cell phones during an arrest.
Carpenter v. United States (2018): Required a warrant to access historical cell phone location data.
2. First Amendment
Text: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Privacy Protections: While the First Amendment is primarily known for protecting freedoms of speech, religion, and assembly, it also implicitly supports privacy. The right to free association, for example, has been interpreted to mean that people have the right to privacy in their associations and beliefs. The government cannot require disclosure of membership lists of groups or monitor lawful private activities without just cause.
Key Cases:
NAACP v. Alabama (1958): Protected the privacy of NAACP membership lists from state government scrutiny, supporting freedom of association.
3. Third Amendment
Text: "No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law."
Privacy Protections: Though rarely invoked in modern legal contexts, the Third Amendment reflects the constitutional commitment to the privacy of the home. It prohibits the government from placing soldiers in private homes without consent, underscoring the principle that individuals should be free from unwarranted government intrusion into their private lives and properties.
Key Cases: The Third Amendment has not been the basis for major privacy litigation, but it has been cited in discussions about the right to privacy.
4. Fifth Amendment
Text: "No person shall be...compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
Privacy Protections: The Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination ("pleading the Fifth") has been interpreted to support the right to privacy concerning personal information. The amendment prevents individuals from being forced to disclose personal information that could be used against them in criminal cases. The "due process" clause also provides a basis for arguing for privacy rights in legal proceedings.
Key Cases:
Miranda v. Arizona (1966): Strengthened the right against self-incrimination, contributing to privacy rights by requiring police to inform suspects of their rights, including the right to remain silent.
5. Ninth Amendment
Text: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."
Privacy Protections: The Ninth Amendment acknowledges that the people have rights beyond those explicitly listed in the Constitution. This has been interpreted by the courts to suggest a broad, general right to privacy that encompasses various aspects of personal autonomy and freedom from government intrusion.
Key Cases:
Griswold v. Connecticut (1965): Recognized a right to privacy in marital relations, stating that the specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights have "penumbras," or implied rights, that create zones of privacy.
6. Fourteenth Amendment
Text: "No state shall...deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
Privacy Protections: The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment has been used to extend the protection of privacy rights against state actions. The Supreme Court has interpreted this clause to protect various aspects of personal autonomy, including rights related to family, marriage, and reproductive decisions.
Key Cases:
Roe v. Wade (1973): Recognized a woman's right to privacy in making decisions about abortion.
Lawrence v. Texas (2003): Struck down laws criminalizing private, consensual homosexual activity, recognizing privacy rights regarding intimate conduct.
Obergefell v. Hodges (2015): Recognized the right to marry as a fundamental liberty under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses, reinforcing privacy in personal relationships.
Conclusion
These amendments form the constitutional basis for privacy rights in the United States. They reflect a commitment to protecting individuals' privacy and freedom from unwarranted governmental interference, a principle that continues to be interpreted and defined through judicial decisions.
We're lucky if we're not being surveyed right now😂
“I feel threatened” as he steps towards the camera man 🤣🤡
"I swear to god dawg". Lol he walked up like a tough guy and sounded like a princess.
Little tike has to bark loud cus he’s so tiny.
When he got out of the car I knew he was a clown and he didn't make me a liar when he said dawg
I was looking for this comment because I didn't feel like posting something I already knew was mentioned
“On purpose dawg”
Man, the only thing missing was a voice crack
Let's not drive off. Let's get out and confront someone with a camera.
Oh Yes, "let's ". LOL
We have things to do in our life
I mean...sometimes your trying to eat or your waiting for a family member to meet you. I guess just accept society being a joke with no punchline and allow the mayhem 😂 I have accepted this aspect but...what a circus.
Just imagine if he hadn't been a "tough guy" right off the bat. "Hey man, I see you recording and that's cool. Any chance I could get you to blur my kids faces while you are editing? I'd appreciate it. What's your channel name? I wanna check it out."
@@brancast116 or they could ya know....not weirdly record people trying to get reactions 🤷♂️
People would be a lot more respectful of each other if Dueling was a thing again! lol
They can do that but cops need to be there and watch for a few states
I start the vote here 👊🏽
Normal folk didn't take part in duels. That was only aristocrats and politicians, normal people then just duked it out like today.
no people are too stupid to know what's bad for them
I wish you could just fight to settle an argument but 90% of the time the person who loses always calls the police
"I swear to god dog" Sounded like an NPC from GTA
🤣🤣🤣
dawg*
@@bofasofa9399 😂
Even looks like a NPC simp! LOL😅
Pmsl a white boy speaking ghetto lmmfao
"Stop filming me" proceeds to hog up the entire screen.
the average man-Karen overestimates his ability to whoop ass by 4000%
A male Karen is called daren, with a small D.
@@sandhanitizer15 lmao nice one
@@sandhanitizer15 never heard that before
They’re actually called Roy’s
Roughly....🤣
"I'm not in a public spot"
*is currently on public sidewalk.
Not intelligent.
😂😂😂
It seems like threatening to stab someone would be an assault crime.
Well threatening to stab isn't assault, but threatening violence is a crime in the same vein as calling for violence.
@@Master_Yoda1990It's actually Simple Assault.
@@ruse_d_news no it isn't, simple assault requires physical contact, verbal threat doesn't constitute assault of any kind.
@@Master_Yoda1990 § 22-404. DC. Assault or threatened assault in a menacing manner; stalking.
(a)(1) Whoever unlawfully assaults, or threatens another in a menacing manner, shall be fined not more than the amount set forth in § 22-3571.01 or be imprisoned not more than 180 days, or both.
(2) Whoever unlawfully assaults, or threatens another in a menacing manner, and intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly causes significant bodily injury to another shall be fined not more than the amount set forth in § 22-3571.01 or be imprisoned not more than 3 years, or both.
@@ruse_d_news and for which state is that?
Bring back duels and all stupidity stops
Free. Dumb.
@Sniggly Wiggly I can wear a mask that says I'm Xi Ping. Am I Xi Ping? Nope. But the mask says I am.
You know in dueling, even when it was legal ever, you have the right to refuse? :O
You can duel. Just go to the local MMA gym and sign a waiver.
Lol I'd love for mutual combat to be in the constitution.
It’s ironic that guy is wearing a shirt on the constitution but doesn’t know the rights reserved to Americans By the constitution 😂
People pick and choose what to follow based on their feelings.
@@mr.jackson01 I could hug you
Weird you don't know that rights aren't granted or reserved by the government.
Its cute that americans believe they are "rights"
They are privileges period. No such thing as rights because if they were rights this country would be the exact same as it was in 1880. Its not though because the government has been amending and completely taking rights away for centuries now. Rights can't be taken away. Yet thoussnds of americans have their rights taken away for simple drug crimes every day.
Lol rights. You mean privileges
@@3rdreichball525 yeah that’s true. America sucks lol
I love how he is not even parked in a spot he is blocking the exit of the parking lot..
Typical darren. ..
He's hiding behind his kids...
Yet there he is instigating "Mutual Kombat!" Right in front of those kids he's trying to protect...😂
I love how the filmer believes he can stand in the middle of the road to film because there no car headed towards him at the time 🤣🤣🤣
@@SafeEffective-ls2pl that never happened nor did he claim he could do so.
Second guy out of the car was hilarious. Trying to act tough with the LEST intimidating sounding voice ever 🤣. Sounding like he lives with SpongeBob. Then proceeding to do the same thing he has an issue with. Dude is gonna get hurt one day for sure.
Stunted intellect ; stunted in every way.
he’s from washington so it explains haha a lot of people from washington are like that. they get one taste of “hood” music
"LEST"? you mean least*?
Washington lol
"sware to gaaawd daaawg" the most un-intimidating walk up ever! =D
Dude literally sounds like a little boy 🤣 go figure hes the type to threaten to stab someone
My entire body cringed at that guy
Sounds like a 5th grader trying to sound cool to his friends lol
Toughest guy in WA
He's mad because he missed the melanin train.
That's the only problem is the dude will not shut up.
Walking into the street also isn't generally advisable.
@@GreyKnight7777 There wasn't any traffic, but it gave the cops an excuse to go hands on.
@@Razgriz85 Exactly. In most states there are rules about where you can be as a pedestrian, and often "the street" is not one of those places.
@xXLogicXx Pretty wild that, in the centuries during which they have existed, SCotUS has not yet seen fit to strike pedestrian laws from the books. Go figure! ;)
@@Razgriz85 the man was being annoying on purpose fuck him.
The first thing these bozos say is there are kids in the car. Then they proceed to traumatize their kids by refusing to simply drive away. They never cared about the best interest of their kids. They were just responding violently to their bruised ego, kids be damned. SMH.
That was the kid
People use kids as a human shield all the time. Americans are no different
Great take
You see unstable irresponsible adults do that a lot. They proceed to start a physical altercation with someone based on the fact that their kids are with them when there’s no physical threat in the first place. And who the fuck cares is some stranger films you as you drive out of a park. Everyone has a camera in their pockets these days it’s nothing special lol.
I was thinking the same thing
The irony of wearing a shirt saying we the people are pissed off, while being pissed about a man exercising his rights and threatening to assault him
He legit asked for a fair fight . Not the same
This is 90% of people identifying as Republican.
@@TimMcvay-t9tyou are missing the point.
principles go out the window when it comes to mild BS
@@TimMcvay-t9tand the other guy did not agree not the same 😜🖕
Poor fool thinks he has privacy in his car lol!
All these mfs are weirdos. Your weird foe saying that. It's really creepy
That made me laugh so hard
Soon as you leave your front door....
Privacy is gone...
Don't care how many kids you hide behind...
Don't take your kids out in public...😢
He does has freedom of speech to complain all he wants. 1A applies to everyone
@@SafeEffective-ls2pl Yes, everyone has a right to make a fool of themselves through their free speech.
They’re so scared of the camera that they decide to walk up straight to it.🤦🏻♂️
The irony of him wearing that shirt… I bet he’s got a thin blue line flag too 😂
Never let an aggressive, hostile person within 6 feet of you let alone arms length.
This. I most likely would have punched the guy in the chin, throat, plexus, or ribs before he got that close and hope for the best. Probably stupid though because most people are pussies and this dude didn't want that smoke, he just wanted to make a scene for his ego.
@@mucura1 6 lbs then you don't have to worry about him coming back 🤷
Nope. Allowing someone to close that distance is bad juju
Well said chael
I always think back to Chael saying “I can’t let you get close” to Vanderlei Silva on Ultimate Fighter.
"I swear to God dawg" with that baby ass voice is incredibly funny
Squeaky is difficult to take seriously.
All 140 lbs of him lol
The “I’ll pull out my knife guy” hit cringe level 💯 😬
He is looking for a quick murder charge. You may end a life, but your life after that will be forever change, especially after bubba met him.
The whole point of a knife is to hide the weapon and use it silently and quietly, not announce its presence.
@@loganthesaint ...or your knife is not a weapon, and you live in a civilized society, so there's no reason to hide it, and you never expected to use it as a weapon...
Every dude in this video was oozing with estrogen 😂
And telling someone to “disengage” like it’s COD isn’t cringe? The “auditor” has the social awareness of a dried shit.
imagine wearing two American flags on you, and trying to violate rights...
happen everyday my man by" peoples" with badge that say to serve and protect .
These two life partners are hilarious. Their children have LONG been forgotten. 7 to 3 their car isn't even locked.
Honestly, this is one of those things where everyone truly deserves each other.
Good point
Agreed.
💯
Yeah, the guy in the car's pretty hotheaded about it, but you'll never not be a creepy asshole for recording random people in public lol.
@@ColinAYB"creepy". Cry a river baby.
We should bring back HS education that actually teaches about your rights, and the things in life that will actually help you like managing your finances, gardening, trades, etc.
The department of education needs leadership! you got my vote!
I had a class that went over that we even went on field trips to the courthouse to watch proceedings.
I think they need a class on minding your own business
Of course the Republicans oppose all education.
Government ran schools aren't interested in people knowing their rights or being self sufficient
The cops were the only cool individuals in this situation!.
This dude obviously didn’t take his ccw class serious, you’re supposed to forget your ego, and avoid situations all together, you’re gun and knife is only to defend yourself. Not start a fight with someone!
It's people like him that make it hard for logical thinking people to get a concealed carry permit. At least in California anyway lol
@@thecolt45a it's people like him that make it so nobody should have one. That guy is completely nuts
@@18matts true he was absolutely nuts lol when he got his concealed carry permit he probably couldn't wait to shoot someone
Channelling his inner George Zimmerman... Who you know is this guy's hero...
@@18matts I'm going to have to stop you right there.
"I got my kids in the car" then proceeds to do a madness.
Process to leave his kids in his car.
For the first time im going To have to say He should’ve been cool with the cops they were literally on your side ! Smh
9:23 "Taking my licence plate"😂 what a crybaby 🍼🍼🍼🍼
I FEEL THREATENED.... as he keeps walking closer to his "threat"
That's not a valid excuse and shows how stupid you are. Fight or flight is real, some people run some people fight. Stay wrong, stay stupid
My sister threatened me once, I knocked her the f*** out! We all good! Shes more respectful towards me now :-)
@@Yukanhayt-Mhenow that or she’s just playing the long con and has been slowly poisoning you 🤣
His fragile ego was indeed threatened
And then tries challenging camera dude to mutual combat, because of how afraid and threatened his crybaby @zz is…..
“Please give me a command” he LITERALLY just told you to get out of the street
He’s literally looking for trouble doing what he’s doing, I can’t believe some of these kids lmao.
Yeah a lawful order to get out of the street two seconds later they cut him. Boot polish all over your lips.
He was blinded with law, didn’t even know what he was saying
@sheepdawwg It was way longer than 2 seconds. In fact, it was 25 seconds EXACTLY from when they 1st told him to get out of the street to the point that they cuffed him. Stop defending idiots like this "auditor". The cops were literally on his side until he decided to start being a dick and purposefully antagonizing the cops and giving them a legitimate reason to cuff him.
Anyone else finding it odd he even recorded a man with children in his car? While also wearing a mask? Sure no physical threat is present but it’s still highly suspect
Why do these yahoos keep expecting privacy out in public? Know the real reason why they were angry, scared they would be recorded hitting their meth pipe
I barely expect privacy in my own home.
Something. They were tripping lmao.
It would be funny if it wasnt so moronic. If that thug would have looked around he would have seen cameras EVERYWHERE. You cant be in public without being recorded, so claiming a right to privacy inside a car with windows on a street or parking lot is beyond stupid.
Let's definitely have duels at high noon. 😂
Officer discretion is about as authoritarian fascist as you can get.
I dunno,forcing people to get a experimental vax is pretty fascist
@@ryanm.3393 who do you think will be doing the forcing?
@@bmanagement4657 democrat fascist sympathizers
@@ryanm.3393 no, the police.
@@bmanagement4657 the police could care less fashie,Biden is coercing companies,employers,and schools to mandate it..you lose,thanks for playing fashie
That guy must have gone through police training
*menacingly approach innocent civilian
*declare "I feel threatened"
*threaten to assault innocent civilian and claim it would be self defense
The blue line hat says it all
Hat and shirt, he was probably fired for this same behavior
First rule of mutual combat...dont talk about mutual combat
You forgot a bullet...
*actually assaults innocent civilians after threatening
*innocent civilians get charged with crimes while officers looks for more victims.
@@mr.cardguy7635 if he was actually part of an American PD he would've been promoted qt least to Sargeant by now
Dude should of just chilled when the cops got there... never let anyone have the satisfaction of visibility changing your mood.
Especially guys…
Emotional men in general are so annoying.
Both parties in this video are just ignorant. The police actually didn’t do anything wrong in this video. 💯
they exist
@@bioodfox7805 who exist???
@@jasontodd9302 the police, lol, that's the wrongdoing
@@bioodfox7805 nah bro. Don’t be like that 😶
@@jasontodd9302 I will. Been on both sides. They don't serve their purpose anymore.
Most auditors are so cringe they're actually being counter-productive.
Amagansett press is the only real one
Exactly, like I don't know how anybody is on that guy's side. He sounds like such a cornball using the word "disengage" to describe every action as if he's a fucking soldier or something. Like yeah, man it's legal for you to film in public, but do you think people are going to like being filmed by some random guy as they go about their day? Doesn't matter to this guy as long as the law told him he can do it. Guys like this are even dumber than the people they try to mock for not knowing laws. I do like when they expose stupid cops, but I also feel like 90% of the guys who do this are just looking for an argument because they have nothing better to do.
Please forgive my ignorance, but do you know what the guy is supposed to be auditing?
Surely he isn't doing his job correctly unless he's supposed to be auditing random people on the street.
@@jeffalbillar7625 indeed, it appears to me that he the man in the hat politely asked him not to film, the male Karen soyboy immediately started screeching, interrupting the other man, who was speaking the entire time in a firm, but calm tone of voice.
Fuck these frauditors.
@@everinghall8622 I wouldn't say that about all of them.
They are doing something that should be done by a government office.
But the idiot in this video is being a prick
"he walked up to my car and started recording my kids". "He got his camera all in my face."
Dawg, you got out of your car. Left your children in danger , and walked up to this stranger and got confrontational. Wtf 🤣
Yeah they have never been punched in the face.
Actually he asked him politely to not record him, then this guy who probably looks like the soy Jack meme immediately cut him off and yelled at him.
Legal or not, that isn't the way we behave in polite society, and legally he should be totally fine with punching this guy in the face as soon as he pointed the pepper spray at him.
The camera guy was looking for a fight this whole time.
What? How did he leave his children in danger? I think you should rewatch this the auditor or whatever was the one who got confrontational. This man initially asked very nicely. I think in the very least people should have to blur any children in footage where they do not have permission from the parents to post online. It's a reasonable exception to allow people's first amendment rights to stay intact and a valid way to address concerns of parents of strangers filming their children.
Washington state is a two party consent state for recording
@Johannes Fiftyeight Why bother having state laws then? Driver's licences are issued by the state and administered state law. Why hasn't any sovtard won their case in court and allowed to driver without a licence?
That ‘ i swear to god dawg’ in that whiny nasally white guy voice just didn’t have the effect he was hoping for.
I'm White and I assure you my voice isn't "whiny" or "nasal".
"You cant film my children"
* publicly uploads photos of his children all over social media*
Like the waste of space you and him are
@@connorleyland8695 lay off the pipe pogchamp
Actually I do believe there are laws against filming underage kids without their Express consent. I remember when a film crew came to my school and we got a paper to sign saying whether or not we consented to being recorded
@@everinghall8622 that's a semi private setting even tho it's a public school the parents have the control over there kids still in that case
Auditor seemed disappointed cops were reasonably enforcing the law and deescalating the situation. As an "auditor," he should have been pleased with the outcome, but instead openly antagonized the officers for no reason.
But auditors are antagonizers.
@@franko8572 Some are and some aren't. LEO's have to act as professionals, citizens do not.
@@vids595 LEO’s don’t have to either, you’d like them to, but what law says they have to?
for sum thts what it really is; there's the Real 1s who r Knights protectin us from the sherrif's of nuttingham, n they r doin it to make change n not just to start ish, but those r like 1 or 2 maybe rn.
i thought one of these guys tht audits canadian cops was cool, but he ain't, it's not about rights n laws n makin the cops honour them, i guess, if yer not from his demographic, as i found him to be by some of his comments to me.
told me i should close my blinds when i mentioned cops doing Absolutely nothing about someone flying n hovering a drone 3ft off my highrise balcony outside my living room window.
it's an indictable offence, but the cops refused to properly investigate so i didn have an adress to send papers to for court. i was denied the right to due process of the law by cops n the guy didn think it a big deal n told me to "close my blinds" n "it's not illegal"
i was stickin up for him on one of his other posts when someone was calling him a "frauditor"..... now i agree with the person.
some of them r just the same as the wak jobs that cause trouble n do stupid pranx for clix n likes.
@@franko8572cool story 👢 licker
Mutual combat should be allowed.
Washington state is a mutual combat state as long as both people agree to the fight and a 3rd party referees the fight completely legal here
What happens in mutual combat if you choke someone out ,then continue to beat their uncocious body for 45 minutes straight?? Cause that would be my strategy
Go to your local MMA gym and sign a waiver.
@@coleykens3284 i do believe you are required to go to your local sheriffs office for mortal combat.
@@AlexxxPerales when one of the parties cant fight the fight is over
Gay mask
I'm definitely no boot licker however in this situation I thought the cops did a pretty good job.
I'm usually critiquing the cops a lot but they def handled that situation well and de escalated .
NC Tyrant Hunter practices is his first and second amendment right when he films. People that have a problem with him filming approach him very cautiously once they see what's on his side. ... J
Someone should probably arrest him for being a threat to the public, then, if he'd shoot someone for asking not to be recorded.
You auditors aren't helping the community at all. You're harassers and abusers, far worse than the police.
I for one would love to live in a world where a challenge to duel to the death is legal. Manners would come back over night.
Literally lol
Besides big D-Bo ass bullies.
Facts
If peoples pride and their worth was on the line and they cared about it.. yeah
Nah people would still have to consent nothing would change
US code 18 section 241/ 242 Deprivation of rights under the color of law ... You have all the right to photograph/ videotaping on and in PUBLIC property and BUILDINGS, even the right from public film into private property and buildings., filming in government buildings ( include staff and visitors and minors ) is include the 1st amendment -- freedom of press ... 4th amendment -- NO RAS/ NO probable cause of a CRIME = NO ID ... Nobody can TRESPASS/ DETAIN/ ID or ARREST you from/ on PUBLIC property whiteout RAS/ Probable cause of a CRIME … there is NO privacy in public ... IGNORANCE of the law is NO ex
The auditor needs to calm down. He won. Coos showed up and did exactly the correct thing. He could have stayed calm and let the police explain to the guys the law, thanked the officers and it would have been a great video. Instead he walked into the street and well... ya. Some guys do 1a audits much better than others.
Most of these auditors are jackasses that tarnish the names of their constituents. They tell the officers to act in a professional and cordial manner yet they do not practice what they preach.
@@KingZealotTactics I get it in some capacity. But your correct. Telling someone "be professional you piece of shit" never worked at any point in time with any person. I see a handful of auiditors that set the example though. Props to those people.
@@KingZealotTactics how wrong can you be. Nowhere in the constitution does it say that you have to be professional but an officer on the other hand is one he’s on the job in to he takes an oath to defend the law. Defending the law is respecting the law
@@sheepdawwg It doesn't have to be written down officially, it's called having manners, surely you have them?
@Sasquatch Ismydad No but I'm sure your mother and father taught you better.
Hey I'm winning the argument between the cops and the two attackers. This feels too satisfying... I'm gonna go stand in the street filming the cop car, and be as annoying as possible so the tables turn on me. 😐
In other words, how to go from right to wrong in less than 5 seconds. Total dumbasses, the lot of em
What's satisfying about being a nuisance. 'tables turned' the language you guys use as if it's a game to have the cops called
@@tramarthomas6105 If you don't want to exercise your rights that's your prerogative, but you don't get to tell anyone else that they can't, regardless of how annoying you think they are.
This dude is a straight up Karen, or Kenny or whatever.
What is he even auditing? Just standing there recording normal people for no reason?
@@everinghall8622 its called first amendment audit. You must be slow.
you can tell the punk with flag shirt is a wanna be cop
This is the adult equivalent to, "stop touching me!!" "I'm not touching you!!" "Stop touching me!"
I wouldn't call any of them adults.
In Colorado Mutual combat means you both get arrested regardless of who started it.
So in other words you have to let someone kick your ass
@@proudboricuaclone9676 yeah. As ridiculous as that sounds. Colorado is a mandatory flight state. You're only allowed to use as much force as required to escape. It's stupid.
In WA, two people can agree to mutual combat and the police can't do much about it.
@@4TheFellas I knew some guys here that got charged with "petty dueling" because they were fencing in the alley. Colorado sucks in a lot of ways.
@@blueunicornhere lmao. Imagine being hit with trumped up chargers of petty deuling.
Only two states out of the entire United States have legalized mutual combat, namely Washington and Texas. Both require a police officer to oversee the fight to ensure no bystanders get hurt, and to break up the fight when an evident victor emerges.
Yup. This video totally botched the legal aspect of this.
this auditor needs to chill a little.... the officers actually did a half way decent job. which is a good thing. they are learning.
Texas and Washington are the only two states where mutual combat is legal, as long as both parties consent. That guy was just scared, clearly.
To many people on earth, hell ya let mutual combat be a thing.
Lol that was the most stereotypical northwest interaction
“They may not be there to bail him out”
He didn’t call them. He didn’t ask to be bailed out. The mutual combat coward and the knife twatwaffle are the ones who needed daddy to take care of their problems for them.
@@digitalwarrior6731 boom
What the police meant was, if someone decided to shoot or stab him for not minding his own business. They'd be too late to bail him out.
He was screaming and harassing them. You're the twatwaffle, audit boy.
*You're analysis late in the video is very misguided. Not sure about that state but "pedestrian in the roadway" is usually a CIVIL INFRACTION at most if it's against the law at all. Typically those laws apply to pedestrians WALKING along the road and are typically required to walk along the shoulder, off the roadway and against the flow of traffic. Failure to do so is a NON-CRIMINAL infraction. As a retired LEO myself you can only go "HANDS ON" to affect and arrest (not happening here) OR for riot/crowd control. Outside of those instances if a LEO puts hands on and it's not to make an arrest, prevent someone from intentionally harming themselves or crowd control it falls in the category of ASSAULT & BATTERY because they didn't have a lawful reason to get physical. A who's legally parked along the edge of a roadway (like those cops) needs to get in/out of their vehicle meaning someone MUST walk into the roadway to get access. If the driver of said car can legally ingress/egress from a legally parked vehicle then by simple logic a regular pedestrian may also walk up to the driver's door of that vehicle to record the interior. The auditor can lawfully walk into the road to approach the driver's door no differently than the driver himself can walk into the road to access the vehicle. That right IS NOT exclusive to the vehicle driver but anyone. That act alone IS NOT in and of itself unlawful.*
Lil buddy that hopped out trying to act tough really made me laugh who did he think he was intimidating with his voice on the verge of cracking with every threat lmao
Lol same here cracking up
Everyone was a dumbass here except the cops. 😂😂😂
Yep
Thanks. The algo served me this video and I was feeling that vibe after the intro. Your confirmation helped me to dip in 15 seconds. TY
Auditor needs to recognize good cops and not take the progress backwards.
Exactly. I’m trying to understand why is he going around filming the public and why is that guy so pissed off about it.
For real even the auditor is a douche 😂. He sounds like a failed law student that is dying to show off what he knows about the law. Then the other 2 were morons specially the dude leaving his kids unattended in the car.
They also misunderstand the locus of self-defense. Even without considering the knife in this situation, the two approaches are the initiators of the incident. This means that they are engaged in a crime and have thus forfeited their right to use self-defense as an affirmative defense.
i.e. One robs a store. The teller pulls out a shotgun and the robber shoots the teller. The robber is charged with murder. In court, he pleads self-defense arguing that, because the teller threatened him with a gun he was in fear for his life. This plea will be dismissed because the robber was in the process of committing another crime and initiated the threatening situation, to begin with. It is the same with these guys. They initiated the incident, the auditor has the "right of way," so to speak, for the purposes of the self-defense claim.
Very well said !
Yeah, just by initiating first contact by approaching him. Is engaging a confrontation! Therefore no self defense case would apply, especially since they were together. Meaning unless he had a lethal weapon, they can't play victim as if they were in fear of their lives bcuz of mace! Especially when dudes holding a fucking camera!
Dude just left his kids in the car. More dangerous I'd say.
To challenge a stranger to a DUEL...
Right. He’s an irresponsible parent smh
Please duel me in front of my children who i have failed to supervise because i have been triggered.
"Youre making me abuse my kids"
Would have been hilarious if the camera guy said "Sure!" When asked to mutual combat and dude was up on him,then instantly emptied the bear spray in his face!!! 🤣
The dude with the camera is just annooooying though. He seems like his just trying ro provoke people so he can get some views or maybe even a lawsuit.
These two guys actually think they are lawyers
I just looked it up on Google lol he said that to the cop
So does the tool with the camera
@@AndrewF321 Well, did you notice the guy with the camera didn't get arrested?
@@saber005 and? He’s still being a wad. He’s basically those kids that put their finger up to your face and say “I’m not touching you”.
@@AndrewF321 Yes. I can agree with that. I'm open minded. Of course I'm sure you are open minded enough to see this? www.theonion.com/insecure-frustrated-bully-with-something-to-prove-cons-1819575405
“ I swear to god dog “ lol oh no please don’t
The auditor channel Amagansett Press. When people walk up to him saying "don't film me". He asks them "If you don't want to be filmed why did you walk up to the camera?
Mutual combat (fist de cuff, an unarmed fight between two consenting parties) should absolutely be legal.
IF it's MUTUAL consent... not a way for bullies to assault people and then claim "mutual combat!" Want mutual combat? Go to a gym and have your combat in a ring with refs.
Go to your local MMA gym and sign a waiver.
It is absolutely legal in Washington State. This video is incorrect in implying it isn’t.
Phoenix Jones fought with two cops watching. But I believe, like you said, can be 100% liable for Charges or civil lawsuit.
He did that was crazy
That's what i was thinking
Nope. Under Washington State mutual combat law, as long as a police officer observes the fight, it’s legal.
We usually just ask “you wanna fight about it”? Then fight about it somewhere appropriate. Mutual combat lmao. Sounds like the woke version of mortal combat
It's actually a law in Washington...it's kind of wonderful
What? That's what it's called...
not woke, but fucking awesome cause now I can mutually combat my friends in public
*see you at the bus stop after school punk*
This has been an unspoken rule since we were boys.
Guys a troll. Tempting others to break the law so he can be a victim. Some will say he’s flexing his right to record in public. The guy is clearly looking for trouble, then mad when he finds it. 🤷♂️
I’m glad someone realizes this!! I been watching all this guys videos and he literally does this to enrage and entrap people
How did you manage to use "his" where you should have used "he's" and "he's" where you should have used "his"
@@FiresAndFoxes oh thanks for pointing that out. I’ll fix it. Enjoy the rest of your day.
@@Nightwoodz poo poo pee pee
Washington is one of the two states where you can have mutual combat
The auditor did ok until the whole walking in the road thing. I can understand why the officers had an issue with that. They were doing a fair job with the guy who had the issue and as an auditor, he should be celebrating that and not just making drama for UA-cam videos to try and make out they were out of order
This is why Jerry Springer was more popular than Phil Donahue. It's the american way. Caos and conflict.
Dude: gets in camera guys face
Also dude: "I feel threatened. I'm going to assault you"
Knowing when to keep your mouth shut is a virtue.
Good grief people it’s a friggn camera and you’re taking the bait by giving him content!!!!
“I feel threatened right now”
*Continues to step towards “threat”
What a bunch of fools. The amount of times they caused trouble then accuse the cameraman of a crime
Tackling him? These police officers were extremely patient with this guy and there was no "tackling" that took place. 10/10 for the officer response. The auditor's performance 100% merited detainment after he walked on the street as if his camera gave him jackass super powers against the authority of the officers conducting their investigation.
At the very least I'm sure there is some form of citation for jaywalking or something he could have been cited for.
I just found your channel. I Liked, Subscribed and hit the Notification Bell!
11:00 from this point this guy was already winning the argument.
Someone once said, “When you’re already winning, shut up.”
Auditor loses this one! Those 2 clowns driving their dead grandma's Lexus are probably still laughing at this guy.
"Yea but if he puts it up on the internet, I can sue him right?"
"Yea I can dude I just Googled it"
BAWAHAHAHA
You can sue anybody for anything. Winning is another question
Seahawks fan says it all 😂probably likes pride rallies and joe Biden.
I could never understand how people make claims of knowing something that they clearly did not study? How do you say "it's illegal to film me" when 1. You've never read this. 2. It's false. 3. The law clearly defines the legality of recording in public spaces
It just makes no sense. It's almost like someone who has never read an iota about genetics trying to tell you that babies are born in the clouds when you've been reading about genetics all your life. It's really disturbing.
You mean an American is uneducated, yet an egotistical know-it-all? No. F**king. Way.
Mutual combat is the government saying we are not getting involved.
What do you think a boxing match is?
@@Iamrightyouarewrong overpaid full contact ballet
Actually, Washington mutual combat law requires a police officer to observe it for it to be valid.
I'm sorry but dude had the high ground until he walked out into the street.