2min19 I'm not sure you would get a penalty of 12, because there is just a gap opening and no gap extension... If there were 2 consecutive gaps, you would indeed get a penalty of 12. But here isn't it just a -10 penalty?
It's -12, because it's a linear expression of the form -(a+bk), where a is the gap opening penalty, b is the gap extension penalty, and k is the number of consecutive gaps. In this particular case, a = 10, b = 2, k = 1. From the user manual: "Thus a gap of k residues receives a total score of -(a+bk); specifically, a gap of length 1 receives the score -(a+b)."
thank you ...this has been so much help
How the hell did you write all these from that side? That takes insane amount of work
you could always mirror the video in post ^^! does look super impressive tho
2min19
I'm not sure you would get a penalty of 12, because there is just a gap opening and no gap extension... If there were 2 consecutive gaps, you would indeed get a penalty of 12.
But here isn't it just a -10 penalty?
I am wondering about that too....
He seems to be counting it as the first insertion
It's -12, because it's a linear expression of the form -(a+bk), where a is the gap opening penalty, b is the gap extension penalty, and k is the number of consecutive gaps. In this particular case, a = 10, b = 2, k = 1. From the user manual: "Thus a gap of k residues receives a total score of -(a+bk); specifically, a gap of length 1 receives the score -(a+b)."