Raptor 3 engine looked so good when I saw it and looked back at the other one. I was like, it looks too complicated, and it has too many parts and pipes and stuff
@@KiRiTO72987 It's not simplified. All of the same parts are still there, they're just buried within the internal structure of the engine so you can't see them. It like burying power lines under ground. They're still there, you just can't see them.
We're not saying bye to the Atlas 5 quite yet, just its last NSSF NROL type launch. I believe there's about 15 Atlas 5 launches left. Various roles. Biggest news of the week is actually the FLAME TRENCH for OLM2! For me at least...
Omitting the TVC to make it look cleaner is a little cheaty, but hey, the majority of the engines on the ship don't have TVC either. Best part is no part!
I assume they would split off star link first and take it public prior to if/when SpaceX goes public. In a few years each entity would probably be in top 5 most valuable companies.
They aren’t going to launch until the Crane finishes lifting all the pieces of the stack. Crane is too valuable and the construction needs to be wrapped up by mid-late August.
While raptor has been getting more clean and modern, I agree with Tory. There is no clear FADEC/ECU on the engine, and it lacks any wiring at all. SpaceX hasn’t somehow magically made a fully mechanical engine that needs no electronics. Especially not for something as autonomous as Starship. They just didn’t put any electronics on it. The picture of it on the test stand shows no electronics on it that are required to run the engine. Likely they got it to the test stand and then put it on the engine after taking the photo. this is like if you took the entire wiring harness out of your engine bay and the showed it off to people as a “Minimalist” design. Once you get to the dyno, and all eyes are off you, you can put the harness on and actually run it:
I think the wiring/elwctronics may have been integrated in some way, think thicker walls and electronics run inside them, since they want to ditch heatshielding and want no reentry burn on booster, that way they could potentially use the engine as the heatshielding to the more delicate parts. But this is just me guessing.This way it's like a circuit board, the meters of wire are there but hidden in the structure. Don't see how they would benefit from not showing something that everyone knows should be there. but no heat shielding will mean that we will see the engines at somepoint on a booster and we will see what they have to add back for it to work and be reliable.
@@U_Geek Yeah I agree that this is probably the case. There's no real reason why they couldn't bury the electronics in the walls of the plumbing. It would make everything look way simpler than it actually is, but that may be part of the appeal.
I think sensors and valves are moved out of dangerous zones to powerhead. There is not much what is necessary near combustion chamber. All valves also are on input area. Pressure from pumps can be measured on lines for pressurisation of tanks. This is what is behind this idea. Minimise weak points in areas that can be damaged by exhaust
Can't they send spaceX to just give this satellite a good shove? What's the worst that can happen? You break it? It's going to die anyway. It sounds like it would be a shame to just let it die without trying to boost it.
Not at all. All pipes that were on previous versions are still there. Just instead as separate pipes, they are present as channels inside corpus. All valves are on the top of powerhead inside that barrel or under those round covers. Imagine making prototype of electronic using universal plate. All wires are visible making visual mess. But in production you will make dedicated plate with printed wires. Same principle.
tory B posts..lol..ULA and Sue Origin are team now..sue to space team. now as Be-4 seem to be lacking and sue Origin not yet space launch company..hint jeff sue..need to reach space first..learn from ULA they must..but..learn what..not reuse..
Raptor 3 engine looked so good when I saw it and looked back at the other one. I was like, it looks too complicated, and it has too many parts and pipes and stuff
NGL when I first saw the one pic of raptor 3 I couldn't believe how simplified it was
@KiRiTO72987 ik, I think it looks way better with color and how simple it is.
@@Space_gravy1 IK I think it's awesome I just had to do a double take the first time o saw it
@@KiRiTO72987 yea
@@KiRiTO72987 It's not simplified. All of the same parts are still there, they're just buried within the internal structure of the engine so you can't see them. It like burying power lines under ground. They're still there, you just can't see them.
It's wild that the engins are already v3, and the ships are about to be v2, and it is not even done with prototyping
Space this week: Helping space nerds survive Mondays, one episode at a time
if the new tower isn't called "launchpad Mcquak" , i'm gonna be pissed!
Same.
@@Elliott-Burton same
Iterative design on full display at SpaceX. Other Companies should take note
Works great if you've got the money to do it.
@@cornerpage6634 works even better when you don’t. really.
@@cornerpage6634Looking at how non-iterative design is working out for Boeing and ULA, I'd say cost isn't the critical factor.
Really cool batman like cutaway there...
Raptor 3 lookin' fly
Raptor 3 Rules!
I’m gonna miss the old style OLM. I think it looks cooler than a flam trench more standard approach
if you take "Northrop Grumman sending a resupply to the iss" out of context it sounds really bad
can we get more ready set slow gameplay i really enjoyed that vid
Loved the vid Matt would love a detailed video on SpaceX’s plans for the launch site seamed like there is a lot more going on
As usual an 11/10 video
Matt i hope you're doing good and i hope your tea is a good temperature for drinking 🤘also happy belated birthday again
Raptor 3 truly follows the Elon's philosophy of *"The best part is No Part"* perfectly.
We're not saying bye to the Atlas 5 quite yet, just its last NSSF NROL type launch. I believe there's about 15 Atlas 5 launches left. Various roles. Biggest news of the week is actually the FLAME TRENCH for OLM2! For me at least...
Well atleast its 6/10 of the video is just spacex instead of 8/10
Raptor 3 is straight out of ksp!
How about using ksp to present space this week? 😅
Raptor 3 at home:NK-9
Raptor 4 at home:AJ-10-37
Love you Matt
What if we started calling Twitter/X TwiX
Would it be left or right TwiX though?
Omitting the TVC to make it look cleaner is a little cheaty, but hey, the majority of the engines on the ship don't have TVC either. Best part is no part!
Well they aren't ommiting it.. It's not a part of the main engine assembly
will space x ever go public like with stocks?
Not unless Elon needs lots of money quickly.
you can invest in tesla instead. I doubt spacex will ever go public.
I assume they would split off star link first and take it public prior to if/when SpaceX goes public. In a few years each entity would probably be in top 5 most valuable companies.
@@knowledgeisgood9645 so next Year
They aren’t going to launch until the Crane finishes lifting all the pieces of the stack. Crane is too valuable and the construction needs to be wrapped up by mid-late August.
Let me test this fancy engine. I wanna hopp away from this freaking escavators.
Call it Ex-Twitter. Very intuitiv, no?
Tony Bruno needs to figure it out and quickly
Day 10 of asking you to play REAL SOLAR SYSTEM the KERBAL SPACE PROMGRAM 1 Mod
Hello
hi
Welcome
hi
It’s pronounced may-cee’s, not mace- eys
24 views in 1 minute in a 9 minute video...
Those numbers speak for themselves
ah yes, we are all watching at 9x speed
500 views 9 minutes in
Nobody cares
the dude has 500k subs, so that view count is to be expected
views are counted as soon as someone watches at least 7 seconds of a video
🚀
I LOVE YOU MATTTT
While raptor has been getting more clean and modern, I agree with Tory. There is no clear FADEC/ECU on the engine, and it lacks any wiring at all.
SpaceX hasn’t somehow magically made a fully mechanical engine that needs no electronics. Especially not for something as autonomous as Starship. They just didn’t put any electronics on it.
The picture of it on the test stand shows no electronics on it that are required to run the engine. Likely they got it to the test stand and then put it on the engine after taking the photo.
this is like if you took the entire wiring harness out of your engine bay and the showed it off to people as a “Minimalist” design. Once you get to the dyno, and all eyes are off you, you can put the harness on and actually run it:
I think the wiring/elwctronics may have been integrated in some way, think thicker walls and electronics run inside them, since they want to ditch heatshielding and want no reentry burn on booster, that way they could potentially use the engine as the heatshielding to the more delicate parts. But this is just me guessing.This way it's like a circuit board, the meters of wire are there but hidden in the structure. Don't see how they would benefit from not showing something that everyone knows should be there. but no heat shielding will mean that we will see the engines at somepoint on a booster and we will see what they have to add back for it to work and be reliable.
@@U_Geek Yeah I agree that this is probably the case. There's no real reason why they couldn't bury the electronics in the walls of the plumbing. It would make everything look way simpler than it actually is, but that may be part of the appeal.
It's also possible there is no electronics on the actual engine. It could be entirely mechanical. Physics says it's possible
I think sensors and valves are moved out of dangerous zones to powerhead. There is not much what is necessary near combustion chamber. All valves also are on input area. Pressure from pumps can be measured on lines for pressurisation of tanks.
This is what is behind this idea. Minimise weak points in areas that can be damaged by exhaust
Sorry friend but your wrong.. They fired her up and there's a picture of it. It looks exactly the same
Yay
mattt lowneeee
I bet it was Musk who forced the engineers not to build a trench.
Legit lol'd at 2:01 🦇👨
Between that and the "X" voiceover added to cover "Twitter", these are the reasons I love Matt's space coverage.
Why all the bots have a partner suddenly. Why the f*ck can bots get a partner but I can’t?
You are a bot
@@Shipwrecker97 hes not
Space grian
Elon Musk's right wing nonsense is really putting me off SpaceX and following the whole programme. It really sucks
Matt lowne you missed the Saturn 8 nova rocket in your Apollo program
Saturn C8 Nova was never actually made
I'm sorry matt, but the precap at the start of each episode is starting to get super long, I think it needs to be abbreviated a little more.
Maaaaaaatt
Can't they send spaceX to just give this satellite a good shove? What's the worst that can happen? You break it? It's going to die anyway. It sounds like it would be a shame to just let it die without trying to boost it.
Day 3 of asking for outer planets mod
29th
It was supposed to be jam packed, and yet I have no jam? Such a ripoff honestly (I want my money back)
Yo matt play some Juno new origins day4
You missed about the Indian astronauts going to the ISS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Ugga dugga?
There is something not kosher with that raptor 3 engine..... 👀....definitely photoshoped to a degree imho
Not at all. All pipes that were on previous versions are still there. Just instead as separate pipes, they are present as channels inside corpus. All valves are on the top of powerhead inside that barrel or under those round covers.
Imagine making prototype of electronic using universal plate. All wires are visible making visual mess.
But in production you will make dedicated plate with printed wires. Same principle.
@@just_archan cool 😎 👍
1st comment
shut up
@@kepler-q186 1st amendment so no
@@joerarey8496 dont know what kepler said, but damn i guess you didnt realize the internet exists in other countries.
@@uncleenk imao
tory B posts..lol..ULA and Sue Origin are team now..sue to space team. now as Be-4 seem to be lacking and sue Origin not yet space launch company..hint jeff sue..need to reach space first..learn from ULA they must..but..learn what..not reuse..
I'm hoping NASA will cancel starliner after this BS.
first
ain’t
Day 12 of asking you to play REAL SOLAR SYSTEM the KERBAL SPACE PROMGRAM 1 Mod
Day 13 of asking you to play REAL SOLAR SYSTEM the KERBAL SPACE PROMGRAM 1 Mod
Day 11 of asking you to play REAL SOLAR SYSTEM the KERBAL SPACE PROMGRAM 1 Mod