A-10 Warthog At D-Day 😳 | War Thunder

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 31 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,7 тис.

  • @TheMilitaryTok
    @TheMilitaryTok  Рік тому +551

    I’m doing a War Thunder pack giveaway right now in my discord! Link is in the community tab on my page! 🙂

    • @Wuddahellll
      @Wuddahellll Рік тому +12

      Pure American freedom 🗿🇺🇸🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅

    • @jeremymorse1123
      @jeremymorse1123 Рік тому +5

      "Pure America Freedom" 🤣

    • @jeremymorse1123
      @jeremymorse1123 Рік тому +4

      Would a flack .88 cause heavy damage?

    • @seanschisler4287
      @seanschisler4287 Рік тому +2

      Just a few questions.
      Fuel? Jet fuel wasn't even made yet in America.
      Next would be replacing ammo.
      You only had 1 aircraft.
      So that's like what 3 or 4 passes the aircraft becomes useless.

    • @goffyguy-rw9gd
      @goffyguy-rw9gd Рік тому +3

      Now give germany a mig 29 during d-day

  • @lsjaguar3190
    @lsjaguar3190 Рік тому +949

    Having creative mode would have significantly helped the allied forces in dropping the atomic bomb

    • @zathary564
      @zathary564 Рік тому +13

      I would spawn in 10

    • @mark5650
      @mark5650 Рік тому

      We wouldn’t have needed the bomb if we had the A10 back then. After the first attack the entire Axis would probably surrender and probably some of the Allies too. There may not have been a Cold War because the Soviets would likely not want anything to do with the U.S.

    • @lsjaguar3190
      @lsjaguar3190 10 місяців тому +12

      @@zathary564 /summon freedom:atomic_bomb

    • @charlesm9929
      @charlesm9929 10 місяців тому +5

      If we had weaponry like the A-10 back then there would've been no need to drop atomic bombs.

    • @charlesstein9368
      @charlesstein9368 10 місяців тому +2

      If we had access to advance weapons of the future in WWII, our adversaries would also have access to advance weapons.
      Ever more effective and lethal weapon systems are continually being developed.
      We should simply be content in having participated and successfully winning WWII.
      Also, we should work to remain the dominant military power which will deter any potential adversaries from seriously considering military action against our great country.

  • @Shanzo-X
    @Shanzo-X 10 місяців тому +418

    Fun Fact:Due to the Heavy Load the A-10 is one Slow bird even a P-51 Mustang could outran it so the A-10 would be very much be Vulnerable to German Air Defenses

    • @300SRT.
      @300SRT. 9 місяців тому +17

      It cant outrun an Aim 9 sidewinder though

    • @90.the.music.guy.06
      @90.the.music.guy.06 9 місяців тому +16

      The AA/AAA guns can’t penetrate its armor.

    • @jlcordry6440
      @jlcordry6440 8 місяців тому +57

      ​@@90.the.music.guy.06the flak 88 : 🤨

    • @maximusflodin247
      @maximusflodin247 8 місяців тому +31

      @@jlcordry6440flak 88 used proximity fuse rounds which don’t need to hit the target. This means that the A-10 could probably survive an AA/AAA gun barrage

    • @Thenextjustintucker
      @Thenextjustintucker 8 місяців тому +4

      That’s why escorts exist to protect the main game

  • @flightstatic4662
    @flightstatic4662 Рік тому +2703

    bros dropping flares in the 1940s lmao

    • @jiyuhong5853
      @jiyuhong5853 Рік тому +95

      flares existed back then. how do you think ground troops called in ground strike fighters like the typhoon

    • @danielholtham532
      @danielholtham532 Рік тому

      @@jiyuhong5853You bozo he meant plane flares that disrupt missiles lock on systems

    • @flightstatic4662
      @flightstatic4662 Рік тому +176

      hint: the first heat seeking missiles (think aim9) were created in the 50s

    • @jeremytheexplorer4689
      @jeremytheexplorer4689 Рік тому +88

      Maybe the pilot just got that Muscle memory activated.. Thingking a stinger will catch him 😂

    • @Zero-jr7ke
      @Zero-jr7ke Рік тому +59

      Nah I think it’s just to scare the fuck out of the Germans. Imagine a line of flairs going through the sky and then you hear burrrrrrrtttt and the bunker next over is gone

  • @chicken
    @chicken 5 місяців тому +41

    The A-10 would have faced challenges in WWII due to its slow speed and vulnerability.

    • @svd2129
      @svd2129 5 місяців тому

      @@chicken 👍🏻

    • @EagleEdits100
      @EagleEdits100 4 місяці тому +2

      Cap, it would be faster than most other planes in 1944. The Nazis can’t compete.

    • @FriendlyneighbourhoodA
      @FriendlyneighbourhoodA 3 місяці тому

      ​@@EagleEdits100 their Me-262 would outspeed it but would be more vulnerable to missiles

    • @hyperion447
      @hyperion447 4 дні тому

      The me262 was faster than the A10

  • @NotAverageBritishKid
    @NotAverageBritishKid Рік тому +553

    "dispense pure american freedom" 🤣

    • @AnshumaanRamesh
      @AnshumaanRamesh Рік тому +14

      Came to the comments right after I heard that 😭

    • @vishalrotti9030
      @vishalrotti9030 11 місяців тому +5

      😂😂

    • @logiccuber8703
      @logiccuber8703 11 місяців тому +6

      Takes me out every time🤣🤣🤣

    • @Wolfgodmak
      @Wolfgodmak 11 місяців тому +7

      Lmaooo theres no other way to describe this flying gun

    • @xpwn3rx
      @xpwn3rx 11 місяців тому +2

      'Merica Fuck Yeah!

  • @ZancoIntel
    @ZancoIntel 11 місяців тому +146

    Imagine if they shot it down, researched it, and reverse engineered it.

    • @gmg6863
      @gmg6863 9 місяців тому +20

      they wouldn't have the resources to make one

    • @keshavbeatz9646
      @keshavbeatz9646 8 місяців тому +2

      they literally had
      you don't know Nazis

    • @gmg6863
      @gmg6863 8 місяців тому +15

      @@keshavbeatz9646 they wouldnt have fuel for it atleast ,

    • @keshavbeatz9646
      @keshavbeatz9646 8 місяців тому

      @@gmg6863 we can consider that
      But still waht if they had ?

    • @gmg6863
      @gmg6863 8 місяців тому +8

      @@keshavbeatz9646 they didnt have enough fuell for their vehicles back then , ofc they would have it for the A-10 but it would starve way more planes than its worth ,

  • @ahuman7199
    @ahuman7199 Рік тому +523

    The 8.8cm flak gun seeing the 350 pound brick in the sky 🗿🗿

    • @useless8695
      @useless8695 11 місяців тому +15

      that one biscuit tin armed with 2cm Flak 38 cannons as soon as there is anything not german in the sky

    • @MOST_RANDOM_OF_THEM_ALL
      @MOST_RANDOM_OF_THEM_ALL 11 місяців тому +5

      Its much heaver than that

    • @The_Simple_Dogfighter
      @The_Simple_Dogfighter 11 місяців тому +2

      The GBU-12 😮‍💨

    • @balla_icee8145
      @balla_icee8145 11 місяців тому +2

      @@MOST_RANDOM_OF_THEM_ALLjoke dude

    • @Snailman3516
      @Snailman3516 10 місяців тому +7

      The flak guns wouldn't stand a chance. Most AA weapons that were effective against piston engine aircraft would be almost if not entirely useless against jet aircraft due to their speed.

  • @michaelmartin5869
    @michaelmartin5869 Рік тому +125

    I was a loader and instructor on the A10 for 4 yrs and not once did we ever load or even keep the hellfire missile in our list of munitions to be loaded.

    • @jamesjoseph5707
      @jamesjoseph5707 11 місяців тому +10

      Yeah really. That's Apache ammo. Lol.

    • @Slim1423
      @Slim1423 11 місяців тому +3

      Is the A-10 worth keeping in service in this day and time?

    • @andrewdanvers308
      @andrewdanvers308 10 місяців тому +13

      ​@@Slim1423yup best loitering flying cannon and bomb dispenser.

    • @Slim1423
      @Slim1423 10 місяців тому +6

      @@andrewdanvers308 Yeah, from how people speak of the A10, it doesn't seem like much can take that jet down! I guess if you have to fly into war, you need a plane that can bring you back in one piece, and i think that is what the A10 seems to do.

    • @andrewdanvers308
      @andrewdanvers308 10 місяців тому +2

      @@Slim1423 it's not in a hurry and can really dish out the pain!

  • @Mymn_0
    @Mymn_0 Рік тому +544

    the gunrun would be so satisfying

    • @PNguyenMorningstar
      @PNguyenMorningstar Рік тому +3

      69 likes

    • @TysiekFox
      @TysiekFox Рік тому

      that sounds like old man farting. i hate that pfffffffffffrt anoying shit

    • @sponduli
      @sponduli Рік тому +3

      Right the junker's got nothing on the sound of the gau

    • @mar3869
      @mar3869 11 місяців тому +1

      I know right? Just strafe the beach and landing ships a few times.

    • @MyMoney76
      @MyMoney76 11 місяців тому +1

      @@mar3869wait what?

  • @johndanskin2261
    @johndanskin2261 11 місяців тому +30

    One fully-equipped A10 would have a moderate yet limited impact on the invasion as a whole. However, the gun's ammo supply is spent exceedingly rapid and once all the bombs and missiles are released...the plane becomes essentially ineffective in combat. Unless there was an efficient method for replenishment, logistics, or repairs (assuming some minor damage), its effectiveness will be significantly diminished.

    • @johnl.8616
      @johnl.8616 10 місяців тому +6

      Thanks Captain Obvious.

    • @spuds416
      @spuds416 10 місяців тому +2

      English coast to Normandy 92 miles. The A10 can be quickly "TURNED" to return to Combat

    • @wannamontana4130
      @wannamontana4130 10 місяців тому

      Spuds has you on this one

    • @vicentee2687
      @vicentee2687 7 місяців тому

      you say it so casually the amount of life lost on the German side would be enormous

    • @kacpermalina308
      @kacpermalina308 6 місяців тому

      Yes this will use 300X times normal amount of fuel, at least he can carry dumb bombs and it's still effective with that amount of lift force.

  • @Panther_D_Tank
    @Panther_D_Tank Рік тому +198

    BV-238 with buffed engine power, or against the AA airfield, it would be hilarious to see it break the sound barrier

  • @Iceteaconsumer900
    @Iceteaconsumer900 11 місяців тому +11

    You gotta remember the soldiers wouldn't have a clue how to use it unless a pilot traveled back in time with it

    • @danuttall
      @danuttall 4 місяці тому

      How long would it have taken "Crazy Canuck" James Doohan to figure out how to fly a weapon system impersonating a jet plane?

    • @EagleEdits100
      @EagleEdits100 4 місяці тому

      I mean, it’s kinda the same other than the missiles.

    • @Iceteaconsumer900
      @Iceteaconsumer900 4 місяці тому

      @@EagleEdits100 modern jets have a shit ton more switches and buttons for stuff that didn't exist in 1944

    • @EagleEdits100
      @EagleEdits100 4 місяці тому

      @@Iceteaconsumer900 Sure, but other than all that, it’s basically the same. Just better.

  • @TC1YT
    @TC1YT Рік тому +50

    Give it to losing side to see if it can change the tide:❌️
    Give it to winning side that already won:✅️

  • @TangoCharlie-mz8lh
    @TangoCharlie-mz8lh 11 місяців тому +10

    "due to its advanced targeting system"
    Oh we ain't even using the A-10A huh xD

  • @fabiospasiano9885
    @fabiospasiano9885 Рік тому +94

    “Even easier than before” the D-Day was catastrophically brutal.

    • @johnrambo5795
      @johnrambo5795 Рік тому +4

      Only at Omaha Beach. Sword, Juno and Gold were comparable easy

    • @Crispy_Bread462
      @Crispy_Bread462 Рік тому +4

      ​@@johnrambo5795Comparing to Omaha? How? Each were somewhat different beaches, Omaha had cliffs, the rest had rather flat terrain. You can't compare what was never the same. (Also each beach except 1 was difficult to capture and secure, with at least 100+ dying in one landing zone to thousands getting slaughtered)

    • @abramo7700
      @abramo7700 11 місяців тому

      Yeah thats exactly why he said easier than before..?

    • @mattep74
      @mattep74 10 місяців тому

      ​@@johnrambo5795 the canadians lost more troops on their beach than the US in regards to percentage involved. Omaha is only big due to yankee propaganda, all beaches except utah was hard

    • @Authentic_American
      @Authentic_American 10 місяців тому

      In percentage, so still less?

  • @matthewcrich5951
    @matthewcrich5951 11 місяців тому +4

    Fun Fact: The “German Defenses” were fortified bunkers. They had no heavy Armour at Normandy

  • @Memzman
    @Memzman Рік тому +629

    HANZ GET THE F***** PANZER

    • @codeyisafk9487
      @codeyisafk9487 Рік тому +44

      I Don't think that's gonna help

    • @Memzman
      @Memzman Рік тому +17

      @@codeyisafk9487 hit your shots kid

    • @netomeneses5477
      @netomeneses5477 Рік тому +48

      Guess you shoud've sid "HANZ, GET THE F***ING FLAKPANZER

    • @Memzman
      @Memzman Рік тому +14

      @netomeneses5477 we were to late hanz it made it past😮‍💨

    • @codeyisafk9487
      @codeyisafk9487 Рік тому +5

      @@Memzman oh me no, I’m not a pilot

  • @awatifali4649
    @awatifali4649 10 місяців тому +3

    Just because there is an electric bolt on your grandpas helmet doesn’t mean that he’s an electrician

  • @NisKI_Twitch
    @NisKI_Twitch Рік тому +200

    "Easier than before" you lost 2600 soldiers in that battle

    • @widbud2595
      @widbud2595 Рік тому +31

      If ur talking about the entire Operation it was 225,000+ casualties which is a big price but the American Beachhead that wasn’t Omaha (cliff) only lost 197 troops

    • @NisKI_Twitch
      @NisKI_Twitch Рік тому +9

      @@widbud2595 At the omaha clif they lost 2600 soldiers

    • @BelugaChonky
      @BelugaChonky Рік тому +3

      ​@@widbud2595how did they loses 225k plus against a skeleton force???

    • @NoahLange337
      @NoahLange337 Рік тому +4

      They also took out the entire costal defense the Germans had 4 years to prepare on the first attempt (the allies kept enough troops in reserve for 2 more)

    • @Helmovic
      @Helmovic Рік тому +4

      ​@@BelugaChonkyI guess entire operation means airborne aswell? Plus all the beaches

  • @coreydavis6427
    @coreydavis6427 10 місяців тому +6

    The A-10 is a grandson of the German World War 2 Stuka dive bomber also. When passing one it will want to say hello grandpa. 😅

    • @paulkolifrath9555
      @paulkolifrath9555 4 місяці тому +1

      Incorrect P-47 thunderbolt. Stuka was obsolete at start of ww2, Poland France and Spain it looked great because there was no opposing Air Force, 2nd the A-10 is not dive bomber, learn your history and maybe brush up on tactics

  • @thelegoman1176
    @thelegoman1176 Рік тому +295

    the A 10 doesnt have helfires, it has AGM 65 mavericks

    • @wingsweep69
      @wingsweep69 Рік тому +4

      You’re right

    • @imperium-cd3ud
      @imperium-cd3ud Рік тому +6

      Either way it's still solos Hitlers army

    • @ddoubleg
      @ddoubleg Рік тому

      Fr

    • @pilopuha
      @pilopuha Рік тому +5

      ​@@Onthefritz69wut, i mean yes the it would be almost impossible to maintain in ww2 but the gun its not that inaccurate when you count it fire at a rate of 4500rpm and it would be having his own engines not ww2 era jet engines

    • @williamcooke6056
      @williamcooke6056 Рік тому

      Legoman knows! Respect!🫡

  • @Henners1991
    @Henners1991 10 місяців тому +1

    The A-10 pilot would strain to see anything with their binoculars before strafing friendly forces, running out of ammunition and Winchester'ing out of there.

  • @dawerrr9906
    @dawerrr9906 Рік тому +24

    Bro dropping flares against flaks 💀

  • @zedanide6984
    @zedanide6984 10 місяців тому +5

    I'd say the Warthog would have a little trouble with the numerous AA flak towers

  • @Norfolksouthern6920
    @Norfolksouthern6920 Рік тому +127

    Ahh yes a10 having hellfires 💀💀

  • @obi0914
    @obi0914 11 місяців тому +2

    Germans: Allies are landing, this is a turkey shoot, why do I hear boss music.

  • @Nate_Higers_8814
    @Nate_Higers_8814 Рік тому +119

    Su 25 in The Battle of Prokhorov 💀💀💀

  • @Themarriedbachelor
    @Themarriedbachelor Рік тому +1

    I saw 2 a-10s fly into a valley at sunset.
    A big red ball just above the mountains at Fort Leonardwood, Missouri
    I’m sitting at the east end of the valley. The valley is about 2 miles long.
    2a-10s came floating into the valley at the west end of the valley.
    As they flew in front of the big orange setting sun,
    one pointed it’s nose upward and after climbing several hundred feet up it nosed over on its back like a whale jumping out of the water just to fall on its back into the water.
    As the A-10 started picking up speed towards the ground it let off a quick burst of ammo you could see the smoke from the rounds firing and the shells falling from underneath of the plane. As the shells fell the sunshine made the brass sparkle like glitter as it fell to the ground. Then the ground erupted with dirt and dust flew up into the air. Just a few seconds later you heard the sound of the 30mm cannon.
    It sounds like a buzzing or humming noise as the rotation of the barrels start spinning. Then a rough growl as the cannons start firing.
    That’s a sight and sound I’ll never forget.

  • @SierraSix112
    @SierraSix112 Рік тому +120

    Let’s just hope you have a airstrip to land on and re-arm the GAU-8 and ordnance, otherwise it would be a short trip

    • @mikea4301
      @mikea4301 Рік тому +12

      If we assume that the plane is only at Omaha (us beach) it would probably just go til the gun was empty and cross the channel back to England. Finding jet fuel and 30 mm rounds in 1944 would be more interesting.

    • @davehood2667
      @davehood2667 Рік тому +12

      @@mikea4301 Ironically the Germans would be the ones to have both, An A10 could probably run on the jet fuel mix for an Me262, and the 30x173mm is the same round the Flakpanzer Kugelblitz used.

    • @ZeroDim
      @ZeroDim Рік тому

      Lmao it would just be a buffed up Me 262​@@davehood2667

    • @peasantfarmerr8917
      @peasantfarmerr8917 Рік тому

      Aircraft carriers

    • @peasantfarmerr8917
      @peasantfarmerr8917 Рік тому +1

      The infantry can capture air strips as well

  • @mattjack3983
    @mattjack3983 10 місяців тому +1

    Yes, an A-10 at Normandy on D-Day would have been a complete game changer. But that could be said for pretty much any weapon from a more technologically sophisticated and developed time being used in past wars and conflicts. Like, Brady Fighting Vehicle would have been a game changer for Custer's troops in the Battle Of Little Bighorn.

  • @Swagmaster07
    @Swagmaster07 Рік тому +4

    Bro was fr using flares on the most primative AA, instinct 😂

  • @SnowzBlox
    @SnowzBlox 3 місяці тому

    The fact that the A-10 was made only 32 years after the war is crazy.

  • @essamarram7525
    @essamarram7525 Рік тому +13

    History channel at 3 am

  • @paullarussa7501
    @paullarussa7501 10 місяців тому +1

    The A-10 has always been my ultimate favorite plane..

  • @RobloxianFourth
    @RobloxianFourth Рік тому +11

    Advanced targeting systems and all that until it’s low fuel and ammo with 6 Bf-109’s behinds it

    • @YourWorstNightmare-x7b
      @YourWorstNightmare-x7b Рік тому

      there was already allied air superiority

    • @hetzer7366
      @hetzer7366 11 місяців тому +1

      LOL there wasn't six BF 109 on D-Day beaches to begin with

  • @A-10aviation
    @A-10aviation 3 місяці тому +1

    Timeline 1943:
    Time traveler:*moves Chair*
    Timeline:

  • @jordanr61317
    @jordanr61317 Рік тому +53

    People dont understand how much AA there was at the battle of normandy, going for cannon strafes in a ww2 setting especially on normandy that warthog is getting clapped. The germans would see that its causing the most damage and immediately focus their AA on that plane. And i promise you. Not even the titanium inlayed cabin of that plane can handle 50+ 25mm or more cannons firing at it all at the same time. It’d be a deathwish

    • @mdj.6179
      @mdj.6179 Рік тому +3

      I was thinking of what's it's operating distance and how far it's base is for refueling and rearmamment

    • @newaccountdoesnotequaltrol6409
      @newaccountdoesnotequaltrol6409 Рік тому

      Oh okay

    • @jd291
      @jd291 Рік тому +8

      The AA guns would be the first to get destroyed so your point is mute.

    • @jd291
      @jd291 Рік тому +7

      @AryanArnoBreker well I'm pretty sure the thermal targeting system would eradicate those in a heartbeat.

    • @keithcraig506
      @keithcraig506 Рік тому +9

      Night time + thermals = advantage A10.
      Can't shoot what you can't see.

  • @wbwam7710
    @wbwam7710 8 місяців тому +1

    *on trial for bule-on-blue*
    "I swear, I thought those were German landing boats!"

  • @Launidad.893
    @Launidad.893 Рік тому +4

    Wow that German tank didn’t even see that coming 😂

  • @Heavywall70
    @Heavywall70 10 місяців тому +1

    Also, that A-10 would have hit the beach significantly earlier than the landing craft, which would have made it further into the beach taking left fire while the Germans were still trying to recover from the initial barrages of a SINGLE A-10. If you had two or three more, 90% of that battle would be won before a boot ever hit the ground.

  • @Kyleplier
    @Kyleplier Рік тому +10

    Is this a User Mission?! It looks fun as Hell!

  • @CakeRSq
    @CakeRSq Рік тому +1

    Anyone else screaming “Night Fury!” while watching this? (Too many dragons for me…)

  • @aurorathekitty7854
    @aurorathekitty7854 Рік тому +13

    Now what would happen if the A-10 was flying for the Germans?

  • @thomassimmons4485
    @thomassimmons4485 10 місяців тому

    "Dispense Pure American Freedom" best line in the video.

  • @alglo_Mei_da
    @alglo_Mei_da Рік тому +22

    Isn't the A-10 notorious for the most friendly fire

    • @Longshot88
      @Longshot88 Рік тому +1

      For modern aircraft in the US specifically

    • @rhysgoodman7628
      @rhysgoodman7628 Рік тому +2

      Yes, it also flew the most CAS, so that’s expected.

    • @ancelotdormulus3151
      @ancelotdormulus3151 Рік тому +1

      Ok

    • @georgefloyd7629
      @georgefloyd7629 Рік тому

      The enemies are in one place so it shouldn't be too hard

    • @abuhajar4222
      @abuhajar4222 Рік тому +1

      ​@@rhysgoodman7628F-16 and 18 have done more CAS, but have much less friendly fire incidents

  • @FxSxRxZ
    @FxSxRxZ Місяць тому

    "even easier than before" is a wild thing to say about D-Day

  • @itrieditathome9760
    @itrieditathome9760 Рік тому +10

    German fires at a-10 with his MG-42
    A-10: laughs in brrrrrrrrt

    • @jamesholden5664
      @jamesholden5664 11 місяців тому

      22 Seconds of Brutttt. That's all it has

    • @Jochald
      @Jochald 11 місяців тому

      ​@@jamesholden5664, yep, and after that its time for some 8,8cm shells.

    • @Satch_4_Hogs
      @Satch_4_Hogs 4 місяці тому

      so good

  • @angrydalek
    @angrydalek 10 місяців тому

    Frankly, simply SEEING the A10, much less hearing or watching your positions be methodically eliminated would induce severe psychological trauma.
    Imagine the Stukka siren effect but times 5

  • @lilboydeedoid1763
    @lilboydeedoid1763 Рік тому +12

    Hellfires. I think you mean mavericks

  • @ZenAlphaFire
    @ZenAlphaFire 10 місяців тому

    You forgot that the 30mm is like full cans of Red Bull so essentially the hog is firing not only freedom but high powered energy cans that make any american feel like taking on the retail work when coffee is not around lol

  • @edwardcook2973
    @edwardcook2973 11 місяців тому +13

    And the A-10 is flying slow enough for every German anti-aircraft gun in reach to open up and blast away at it. No plane can take that much concentrated damage, not even the A-10.

    • @thomasc1753
      @thomasc1753 10 місяців тому

      Fog.... The krauts wouldn't even see it.

    • @Cobenop
      @Cobenop 10 місяців тому +1

      Bro the at-10 has so much armor on it even not explosive modern anti-air munitions struggle to do anything. I dont think their bringing one down in the 40s.

    • @kurnass2000
      @kurnass2000 8 місяців тому +1

      @@Cobenopso much armour in its cockpit, it would get shot down anywhere with some form of anti air get to reality

    • @kurnass2000
      @kurnass2000 8 місяців тому

      @@Cobenopthey would, the a10 would be shot down easily

    • @GodSaveTheOOP
      @GodSaveTheOOP 5 місяців тому

      @@Cobenop The germans 100% drag their nuts over an A-10 in the 40s, they were more than capable of sticking a pig midair for comparably fast aircraft at higher altitudes.
      We don't fly A-10s modern day through anti-air because they're still paper thin to flak.

  • @ThorMoore
    @ThorMoore 11 місяців тому +1

    This is literally “Test WWII but I had Admin commands”

  • @GOST-on1hu
    @GOST-on1hu Рік тому +36

    But the airbase won't have the correct fuel

    • @nikolaideianov5092
      @nikolaideianov5092 Рік тому +6

      It uses a turbine .it would work on anything that is liquide and burns

    • @jyralnadreth4442
      @jyralnadreth4442 Рік тому

      They did have usable fuel for Jets back then...not the high end stuff but something that would get it airborne and operational

    • @shawnr771
      @shawnr771 Рік тому

      Jet Fuel is Kerosene.
      A10 will run just fine on it.

    • @Groza_Dallocort
      @Groza_Dallocort Рік тому

      ​@@shawnr771also the A-10 aint that picky

    • @otaviom6480
      @otaviom6480 Рік тому

      The concern isn't even the fuel, but the weapons and the airstrips at the time not being big enough. The A-10 would need a very large airstrip to land since whatever patch of land the A-10 lands in, won't be paved

  • @Mysterio-Solar
    @Mysterio-Solar 10 місяців тому +1

    Imagine what 5 Sea Harriers could have done in the Battle of Normandy . They would have leveled that Beach hovering from the Sea or making passes over the area with multiple Weapons .

  • @EmpDoU1
    @EmpDoU1 Рік тому +7

    A-10 doesn't have hellfires lol it has mavericks

  • @Kevenough
    @Kevenough 11 місяців тому

    "Easier than before." The dudes who died crying for mother. "Oh really 😐"

  • @mitch9114
    @mitch9114 11 місяців тому

    “dispense pure American freedom onto the defenses” I love that 😂

  • @Kevin_777_player14
    @Kevin_777_player14 Рік тому +4

    How Much Does an A-10 "Warthog" Cost? The A-10 was built to be inexpensive and take a lot of damage. Because of this, the Air Force knew parts had to be easily obtainable. The result of that kind of engineering made for a plane that cost $1.4 million per unit in 1970 (just under $10.1 million today).10 Αυγ 2022 🗿👽

    • @jamesfrank3213
      @jamesfrank3213 11 місяців тому

      $1.4M per aircraft in 1970. $10.1M today.

  • @flipstheking6464
    @flipstheking6464 4 місяці тому

    Imagine being a young German soldier and you just hear a loud brat sound echoing from the fog as the bunker next to your randomly explodes.

  • @Ninja124_
    @Ninja124_ Рік тому +6

    Pure American Freedom💀

  • @flaminghunter1
    @flaminghunter1 8 місяців тому

    "Sir all targets destroyed!"
    "Where are our men?"
    "Destroyed!"

  • @coltonashton9368
    @coltonashton9368 10 місяців тому

    The time traveling A-10 realizes what day it came too and what year.😂😂

  • @williammayfield1207
    @williammayfield1207 Рік тому +7

    You rain down pure American freedom I love it

  • @anthonyklanke1397
    @anthonyklanke1397 10 місяців тому

    "Hmm whats this zipping past me and causing my comrades to turn into a fine red mist?"
    "Why thats good old American freedom Timmy"

  • @travishelgen9213
    @travishelgen9213 Рік тому +5

    People think the a-10 works a Great plain and as a ground attack vehicle it's great but the problem with it is in world war II it had something that could shoot it down the me 262 Germany's production fighter, armed with the base model was twin 30 mm cannon, and it could travel 300 km an hour faster than the a-10 can, the me 262 had been in service to the Reich for a few months before dday

    • @michaelmartin5869
      @michaelmartin5869 Рік тому

      Since we are playing imaginary games, the A10 carries Aim-9 AA missiles so the ME 262 would AA kills for the A10.

    • @travishelgen9213
      @travishelgen9213 Рік тому

      @@michaelmartin5869 since we're playing imaginary games I would imagine since the Germans designed the initial guidance systems and likely the guidance systems for the initial series of aim9s, they would have wunderwaffen that counters the rocket so it wouldn't be able to shoot down their aircraft or even lock on, and the a-10 would still lose in a dogfight

    • @edwardcook2973
      @edwardcook2973 11 місяців тому

      The Me 262 had four 30mm cannon, not two.

    • @travishelgen9213
      @travishelgen9213 11 місяців тому

      @@edwardcook2973 your only making my point stronger, and the a-2a only had 2

    • @michaelmartin5869
      @michaelmartin5869 11 місяців тому

      @@travishelgen9213 well the Aim-9 isn't a rocket so I guess it would still lose lol.

  • @Double_D__
    @Double_D__ 11 місяців тому

    Everybody gangsta on the Atlantic Wall until Republic Aviation sics an armored gun with wings on the pillboxes 💀

  • @HyperzonYT
    @HyperzonYT Рік тому +5

    But without the German scientists, we would have no A10 😅

    • @imperium-cd3ud
      @imperium-cd3ud Рік тому

      Then why is it in the us aviation then

    • @Trollxgodurl
      @Trollxgodurl Рік тому

      @@imperium-cd3udare u dumb💀💀💀💀

    • @donte10111
      @donte10111 Рік тому

      Well, for one. Germany wasn't the only one making and researching jet engines. On top of that, the A10 uses turbine engines. You really have no idea what your talking a out

    • @HyperzonYT
      @HyperzonYT Рік тому

      @donte10111 Think more in detail and not so directly. Without Dornier, there would be no Fairchild Republic. Without the Germans, we wouldn't have nukes (until way later) and many other aircraft that we use to this day. There wouldn't be a need for the A10 because we wouldn't be invading anyone in our state. There wouldn't be a "Cold War" either, so NO USE for the A10. We would be weak and probably invaded or in poverty.

    • @HyperzonYT
      @HyperzonYT Рік тому +1

      @donte10111 And mentioning turbine engines make you sound like a fool because Germans were first to research and produce turbine and jet engines.

  • @geekymetalhead5112
    @geekymetalhead5112 11 місяців тому

    "Soooooo what does it do again?"
    "Okay so big gun go brrrt, but we use the plane to carry gun and you just operate the stick so you know where to aim"
    "Sounds simple enough"

  • @panierter_luan
    @panierter_luan Рік тому +11

    Me262 mfs be like: 🗿

    • @Markortiz-i8s
      @Markortiz-i8s Рік тому +2

      A10 can destroy it with gau 8 and remember it has guided missile so thats mean even the target its far it can fire the missile💀💀💀

    • @Watermeloncat70
      @Watermeloncat70 Рік тому

      @@Markortiz-i8strue its aim aams would easily detroy them because me262 does not have flares ofc

  • @TimothyM1903A4
    @TimothyM1903A4 10 місяців тому

    Imagine you're firing your MG-42 and MG-34 into the allied troops, and all of a sudden you hear a "BRRRRRT!" followed by a massive jet coming out of the fog.
    [Level-Five PTSD, Achieved!]

  • @CUPCAKE_MW
    @CUPCAKE_MW 5 місяців тому +2

    What would happen, if SU-57 come at 1812 to destroy France 💀

  • @russell4370
    @russell4370 10 місяців тому

    Effing A, the A ~ 10
    Thunderbolt is one fighter that needs to stay in production 👏.

  • @E-Dad_Operator
    @E-Dad_Operator 10 місяців тому

    A10 in the medieval age would have them dudes terrified

  • @LoneWolfsLair
    @LoneWolfsLair 10 місяців тому

    Germans: mein god, have mercy!
    Warthog: eardrum bursting star spangle banner with bald eagle screeching as it unloads on them.

  • @somersetcace1
    @somersetcace1 Рік тому

    "Allow them to drop pure American freedom on the German defenses." That's one way to put i1! 😂

  • @Echo_Recon_01
    @Echo_Recon_01 11 місяців тому

    A-10 flying together with a squadron of P-47's:
    P-47 Pilot: See those Panzer column that's the one that were attacking.
    A-10: Damn this War is Target rich environment. 😅

  • @sjshbs-kr6ui
    @sjshbs-kr6ui 4 місяці тому

    Other countries: my plane has a gun and missiles
    USA:My gun has plane and missiles

  • @tyler3372
    @tyler3372 10 місяців тому

    "the A10 promptly mistook the allies crawling across the beach for axis troops and gunned them down"

  • @zaskarclf
    @zaskarclf 11 місяців тому

    So basically an A10 pilot needs to figure out how to time travel back to Day and rain hell on Nazis and save Allied lives.

  • @Marder.III-uw2hy
    @Marder.III-uw2hy 21 день тому

    "Sarge! There is some Plane flying at us but, it doesnt have a propeller and its fast!"
    "Holy shit..."
    *the A-10 makes the battle shorter and leaves*
    "its like a guardian angel sent by god"

  • @L3lnd
    @L3lnd 11 місяців тому

    " using its *gee ay you eight* cannon " this line hurt me mentally 😭😭😭

  • @Idcaboutyourfeelings24
    @Idcaboutyourfeelings24 4 місяці тому

    Germans in the bunker - Did you fart? Wasn't me. Who farted?

  • @metroidhunter965
    @metroidhunter965 11 місяців тому

    Hitler’s sitting there shaking his finger going “das wunderwaffe!!”

  • @Aizen_Sosuke999
    @Aizen_Sosuke999 5 місяців тому

    "Dispense pure American Freedom"
    That's the most american thing i've ever heard since i woke up.

  • @nicksalehi97
    @nicksalehi97 5 місяців тому

    The thing is, that the A-10 while it would obliterate anything it targets. What it doesnt target would be a big issue. Anti air during this part of the war had advanced enough to be effective against planes going 400km/h to 700km/h. The A-10's top speed is around 650-700km/h. So for it to live it would have to stay way up high and hidden in the bad weather, taking care not to get too close.

  • @phillipmitchell71
    @phillipmitchell71 11 місяців тому

    Liberty Prime approves of the line "Dispense pure American Freedom."

  • @nobleman9393
    @nobleman9393 10 місяців тому

    The amount of friendly fire it would cause, could give the Germans an advantage.

  • @realitystrikes1998
    @realitystrikes1998 10 місяців тому

    One full armed platoon of the 101st Airborne...from 2024. Forget little groups of paratroopers they'd be nigh unstoppable.

  • @jpgiii85
    @jpgiii85 Рік тому

    "Even easier" like it was a walk in the park before. lol

  • @vidiotsyndrome
    @vidiotsyndrome 10 місяців тому

    ".....if AN (singular) A-10 were present..."
    Now make it a full 6plane air wing.....

  • @Williameagleblanket
    @Williameagleblanket 11 місяців тому +1

    Didn’t have an A-10, only courage, and intestinal fortitude to take Omaha beach.
    🇺🇸

  • @ammonford1122
    @ammonford1122 7 місяців тому

    All I heard was:
    “What would happen if we loaded new born baby into an artillery cannon”

  • @fletcharoo
    @fletcharoo 9 місяців тому

    Wait until that thing runs out of munitions, there ain't no modern military munitions out there

  • @ThomasHarrison-u8l
    @ThomasHarrison-u8l 11 місяців тому

    Omaha Beach was the hardest place because of the loss of DD M-4 Sherman tanks. The defenders, for whatever reason, chose to lift their fires from the beaches, and target warships. This slight respite allowed the infantry to consolidate, and more inwards. At one point, Allied commanders were ready to retreat from the beaches. Additional reinforcements had already stopped because of the congestion and carnage on the beaches.

  • @Juan.G.2966
    @Juan.G.2966 10 місяців тому

    There is a movie called the Final Countdown, a modern day navy battle group goes back in time right before Pearl Harbor gets attacked.

  • @phillipbradshaw4006
    @phillipbradshaw4006 4 місяці тому

    "Dispense pure American freedom..." LOL

  • @facepalmmigraine9509
    @facepalmmigraine9509 10 місяців тому

    I saw what the Warthog could do during Desert Storm.
    Let's just say I was glad it was on our side...

  • @nightskyflyer2638
    @nightskyflyer2638 9 місяців тому

    “foggy conditions” and “a-10” doesn’t sit right with me

  • @oldhag2881
    @oldhag2881 11 місяців тому

    The big problem at Omaha was that poor weather made the pre-invasion bombing inaccurate.