hes not going anywhere he has a united party behind him. Youre dreaming if you think there will ever be a vote of no confidence, this is not the famously warring tory party. Starmer has expunged the hard left from the party and they are the only ones who even somewhat opposed him. All the remaining MPs in the party are centrist MPs and the majority of them were appointed by Keir - theyre mostly brand new members of parliament. Theres absoloutely no chance they will ever vote no confidence in Keir when oppinion polls are largely irrelevant less than a year into a 5 year term - please understand Labour DO NOT CARE what the public thinks of them right now. Opinion polls wont matter at all until the year of the general election. Until then Labour have no interest in what the public thinks they expected some of their policies would be intially unpopular becauser we have an idiotic electorate who are too dumb to understand that true change will not happen overnight and not only that it takes sacrifice. Sorry but thats just the reality of the situation and the public need to shut up moaning and give these policies time to bear fruit instead of just stupidly expecting things to be better immediately. Our electorate are a bunch of brainwashed, ignorant fools taken in by a populist liar in Farage who need to understand that 14 years of tory governance has all but destroyed the country. Keir is trying to rebuild us so its abaoloutely staggering for these right wing muppets to be calling him the worst PM ever for trying to repair the damage caused by the tories. You want public services that work properly? IT COSTS MONEY. THAT MEANS MORE TAXES.
Hopefully in the near future Nigel Farrage will be the New Pime Minister and Stramer can retire out of politics he acts like a tyrant against the British people
LOL 'The video is not intended to promote any political agenda, but rather to provide insight into the ongoing developments in UK politics' Gemini - 'Check this video for political agenda or bias'. Okay, let's analyze the provided text for potential bias. Gemini 2.0 says - Overall Tone and Framing: Crisis Narrative: The text immediately establishes a crisis narrative. Words like "threat," "suppressing," "assault," "manipulating," "betrayal," and "Pandora's box" create a sense of urgency and alarm. This framing suggests a severe problem that needs immediate attention. Us vs. Them: There's a clear division between "the people" and the political establishment (particularly the Labour party). This "us vs. them" mentality can contribute to bias. Emotional Appeals: The text uses emotional language to evoke feelings of frustration, anger, and betrayal in the audience. Phrases such as "insult to their intellect" and "not willing to wait until it's convenient for the government" are emotionally charged. Leading Questions: The text poses questions that imply a negative answer and suggest wrongdoings such as "If elections can be postponed for political convenience what's stopping future administrations from doing the same". Strong opinions presented as facts: The document presents the opinion that the delay of elections is a "betrayal", it is stated that the government "doesn't trust its own people" to make the right decisions, even if those are opinions and not facts. Specific Areas of Potential Bias: Labor's Actions: The text portrays Labour's decision to delay local elections in an extremely negative light. It's framed as an attempt to "evade public scrutiny," "preserve their hold on power," and "undermine the very foundations of democracy." While those accusations might be true they are just an opinion and can't be presented as a fact. Nigel Farage and Reform UK: The text presents Nigel Farage as a hero-like figure who is bravely calling out the establishment and representing the people's concerns. There is a strong emphasis on his popularity and the growth of Reform UK, without significant scrutiny or opposing viewpoints. Conservative Party's Silence: The conservatives' lack of response is depicted negatively, it is presented as either weakness or complicity. This ignores other possible reasons for their silence and presents a very negative viewpoint. Public Opinion: The text highlights the public's frustration and cites the petition with 3 million signatures as evidence of widespread outrage. While the petition is a real event, it does not account for the whole population or take into account polls that may contradict that view. Lack of Alternative Perspectives: The text heavily relies on criticisms from figures like Nigel Farage without balancing it with opposing viewpoints and does not present the government's justification in a balanced way, using dismissive language like "Labor's justification might seem logical at first glance but the deeper you look the more it falls apart". Selective Polling Data: The text mentions polls that show Labour is unpopular and that Reform UK is rising, but it does not present the full picture. It omits mentioning other polling data that may contradict their claims. Summary of Bias: The text shows strong bias against the Labour party and in favor of Nigel Farage and Reform UK, portraying the situation with a highly negative slant toward the government's actions. Specific examples of language displaying bias: "disturbingly quiet" instead of "remained quiet" "this is not leadership it's manipulation" instead of "this has been described as manipulation" "the very foundations of democracy" instead of "the foundations of the democratic process" "they are betraying the British people" instead of "their actions have been described as a betrayal" Conclusion: The text is not a neutral, objective analysis of the situation. It presents a very biased view, using emotionally charged language, and selective arguments to persuade the reader of a specific viewpoint. The text acts as a political piece against the current Labour government.
Don't be silly, every org costs money to run, £25.00 for membership is very low compared to other organisations.Dont join, just vote for Reform, if that's how you feel.
Keir Stalin will never resign, he has his snout too far in the trough.
The Uk 🇬🇧 needs Reform
Starmer is a dictator, he has to go .NOW!
He'll never quit - a no-confidence vote by his own MPs is the only way to get rid of him.
hes not going anywhere he has a united party behind him. Youre dreaming if you think there will ever be a vote of no confidence, this is not the famously warring tory party. Starmer has expunged the hard left from the party and they are the only ones who even somewhat opposed him. All the remaining MPs in the party are centrist MPs and the majority of them were appointed by Keir - theyre mostly brand new members of parliament. Theres absoloutely no chance they will ever vote no confidence in Keir when oppinion polls are largely irrelevant less than a year into a 5 year term - please understand Labour DO NOT CARE what the public thinks of them right now. Opinion polls wont matter at all until the year of the general election. Until then Labour have no interest in what the public thinks they expected some of their policies would be intially unpopular becauser we have an idiotic electorate who are too dumb to understand that true change will not happen overnight and not only that it takes sacrifice. Sorry but thats just the reality of the situation and the public need to shut up moaning and give these policies time to bear fruit instead of just stupidly expecting things to be better immediately. Our electorate are a bunch of brainwashed, ignorant fools taken in by a populist liar in Farage who need to understand that 14 years of tory governance has all but destroyed the country. Keir is trying to rebuild us so its abaoloutely staggering for these right wing muppets to be calling him the worst PM ever for trying to repair the damage caused by the tories. You want public services that work properly? IT COSTS MONEY. THAT MEANS MORE TAXES.
Starmer has an ego bigger than his brain
3 million
Please don't show stamers face on my TV as he makes me physically sick.
Same here he makes me want to spew
You are not alone!
@@chimera8421me too 😢
Stuns the nation? Dream on nobody has even heard it
More robots less humans, sorry fewer humans
Communism full blown
Better than Nazi lovers !
Hopefully in the near future Nigel Farrage will be the New Pime Minister and Stramer can retire out of politics he acts like a tyrant against the British people
LOL 'The video is not intended to promote any political agenda, but rather to provide insight into the ongoing developments in UK politics'
Gemini - 'Check this video for political agenda or bias'.
Okay, let's analyze the provided text for potential bias.
Gemini 2.0 says - Overall Tone and Framing:
Crisis Narrative: The text immediately establishes a crisis narrative. Words like "threat," "suppressing," "assault," "manipulating," "betrayal," and "Pandora's box" create a sense of urgency and alarm. This framing suggests a severe problem that needs immediate attention.
Us vs. Them: There's a clear division between "the people" and the political establishment (particularly the Labour party). This "us vs. them" mentality can contribute to bias.
Emotional Appeals: The text uses emotional language to evoke feelings of frustration, anger, and betrayal in the audience. Phrases such as "insult to their intellect" and "not willing to wait until it's convenient for the government" are emotionally charged.
Leading Questions: The text poses questions that imply a negative answer and suggest wrongdoings such as "If elections can be postponed for political convenience what's stopping future administrations from doing the same".
Strong opinions presented as facts: The document presents the opinion that the delay of elections is a "betrayal", it is stated that the government "doesn't trust its own people" to make the right decisions, even if those are opinions and not facts.
Specific Areas of Potential Bias:
Labor's Actions: The text portrays Labour's decision to delay local elections in an extremely negative light. It's framed as an attempt to "evade public scrutiny," "preserve their hold on power," and "undermine the very foundations of democracy." While those accusations might be true they are just an opinion and can't be presented as a fact.
Nigel Farage and Reform UK: The text presents Nigel Farage as a hero-like figure who is bravely calling out the establishment and representing the people's concerns. There is a strong emphasis on his popularity and the growth of Reform UK, without significant scrutiny or opposing viewpoints.
Conservative Party's Silence: The conservatives' lack of response is depicted negatively, it is presented as either weakness or complicity. This ignores other possible reasons for their silence and presents a very negative viewpoint.
Public Opinion: The text highlights the public's frustration and cites the petition with 3 million signatures as evidence of widespread outrage. While the petition is a real event, it does not account for the whole population or take into account polls that may contradict that view.
Lack of Alternative Perspectives: The text heavily relies on criticisms from figures like Nigel Farage without balancing it with opposing viewpoints and does not present the government's justification in a balanced way, using dismissive language like "Labor's justification might seem logical at first glance but the deeper you look the more it falls apart".
Selective Polling Data: The text mentions polls that show Labour is unpopular and that Reform UK is rising, but it does not present the full picture. It omits mentioning other polling data that may contradict their claims.
Summary of Bias:
The text shows strong bias against the Labour party and in favor of Nigel Farage and Reform UK, portraying the situation with a highly negative slant toward the government's actions.
Specific examples of language displaying bias:
"disturbingly quiet" instead of "remained quiet"
"this is not leadership it's manipulation" instead of "this has been described as manipulation"
"the very foundations of democracy" instead of "the foundations of the democratic process"
"they are betraying the British people" instead of "their actions have been described as a betrayal"
Conclusion:
The text is not a neutral, objective analysis of the situation. It presents a very biased view, using emotionally charged language, and selective arguments to persuade the reader of a specific viewpoint. The text acts as a political piece against the current Labour government.
Just a waste of time, as with all like-named chancers
Don't want Fararg he's asking for 25 pounds that's everybody we shouldn't have to do that..................................
Don't be silly, every org costs money to run, £25.00 for membership is very low compared to other organisations.Dont join, just vote for Reform, if that's how you feel.
The Tories had a £25 fee for members then put it up