SPECIAL VIDEO - NL200 Extended GamePlay [2 hours]

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 сер 2024
  • If you want to improve your game with me and learn concepts you never heard before : form.typeform.... Contact me : Yolan.cp@gmail.com
    My instagram : www.instagram....
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 62

  • @zzxyyxxz4976
    @zzxyyxxz4976 Рік тому +12

    really liking the long versions of the play and explains. thanks!

  • @joannes3392
    @joannes3392 Рік тому +3

    Toujours un plaisir d’avoir un coaching de 2h gratuit. Ça fais travailler notre anglais mais on prend ahah! Super vidéo comme d’habitude. 🤝🤝💪💪

  • @rafa17453
    @rafa17453 10 місяців тому

    Absolutly love this video. Play in this pool myself everyday and can take so much away from this video. Please consider making another one of this format it is amazing for learning. Thank you so much!!

  • @beniolinhox5679
    @beniolinhox5679 Рік тому +5

    more this type of stuff ❤❤❤

  • @leonid1238
    @leonid1238 Рік тому +4

    thank you Yolan!!! Its a realy good format)) i watch every hand on a mikrosсope. Im from Ukraine, i wait another roket attack from rasia, but i watch all your video

    • @YolanCohenPoker
      @YolanCohenPoker  Рік тому +5

      This is the most funny but actually not funny comment i ever seen

  • @papapoker
    @papapoker Рік тому +2

    this is that particular time when longer is better :D

  • @brenneisenchevy981
    @brenneisenchevy981 Рік тому +2

    great content :) lately i´ve been thinking about timing tells a lot what are your toughts on snap bet´s ? For myself i noticed if its a spot where you have to find unnatural bluffs its even harder to find them instant so more value heavy. On Cards where the nuts changed i felt its more likely to be a bluff cause youre value range mostly has to think a few seconds if its still able to value bet or consider a good sizing.

    • @YolanCohenPoker
      @YolanCohenPoker  Рік тому +2

      It's nearly impossible to generalise patterns when we do timing analysis. It will depends on the player too much.
      However we can see patterns that are oriented more in a way than the other.
      You're correct that often, (not always) player need to think with their value (which size do they take etc..) while bluffing is more intuitive.
      Also human has the tendency of using deception more than non-deception (deception = I make you bêle e I have the opposite of what I have) . So Snap looks stronger.
      Again we can't generalise , some players know this and snap value or polar bluffs.

  • @matfab2613
    @matfab2613 Рік тому +1

    this is golden nugget!!

  • @ramirohergenreder9713
    @ramirohergenreder9713 Рік тому

    My unconscious memory appreciates your content

  • @jimmyballs5662
    @jimmyballs5662 Рік тому

    Very good video mate, appreciate the longer videos. I love how you constantly think about spots and never really autopiloting spots.
    I had a question, before you played low stakes 10NL video, would you open button so often if small blind is flatting tons and big blind are defending often?

    • @YolanCohenPoker
      @YolanCohenPoker  Рік тому

      Yep cause my edge will compensate. Actually like if they call more , they are just going to fold more on every lines.

    • @jimmyballs5662
      @jimmyballs5662 Рік тому

      @@YolanCohenPoker i understand I just think it’s super difficult when they’re very stationy like very station

  • @positivelife9720
    @positivelife9720 Рік тому +3

    long versions are way betther ... i wish u can make even 5 7 hour sessions very nice play tho learning a lot from you

    • @YolanCohenPoker
      @YolanCohenPoker  Рік тому +3

      Ahaha , why not doing a 10hours video as a challenge .

    • @papapoker
      @papapoker Рік тому +1

      @@YolanCohenPoker we request 10 hour challenge!!!!!!!!!!! :DDD

  • @luckymaggie6594
    @luckymaggie6594 Рік тому +1

    ❤️

  • @ramirohergenreder9713
    @ramirohergenreder9713 Рік тому

    The rival's check in the river 1:22:07 seemed very creative to me, any agro would push, but he made the wrong player, excellent check-behind

    • @YolanCohenPoker
      @YolanCohenPoker  Рік тому +2

      The range reading here is extremely difficult .
      He arrives river with super high frec of QQ-KK , high frec of JJ-TT And frec of AA (some players will x often flop or turn)
      He arrives river with bluff too. But because most players slightly under3b from the bb (and in this pool I would say the difference is big) , the bluff weight are difficult to find.
      So he has his KK QQ all the time and some bluff. When he check, some players always have bluffs. But firstthey need to have AK AQ (that can x flop or x turn, so river ponderation is not 1) , and second they need to call.
      Even vs a small bet he can fold, and the cost of being bluff raise here is disastrous. Better to x imo but given the small ponderation of KK QQ when he x the river , it's close, probably a bet vs most guys

    • @ramirohergenreder9713
      @ramirohergenreder9713 Рік тому

      @@YolanCohenPoker If the range is strong, I still think a 1/4 or 1/3 bet might work better if the other player is bluffing, to get more value out of 99, TT, JJ and leave an infrequent push to AQ, AK. The check can be creative but it works against a very aggro player probably nothing else.

    • @YolanCohenPoker
      @YolanCohenPoker  Рік тому +1

      @@ramirohergenreder9713 i agree yeah, wasnt clear on my mess above, in this specific context i think betting 1/3 is better.

  • @yenomrtgllwi
    @yenomrtgllwi Рік тому

    Great content!

  • @ArunasSapitavicius-of7kj
    @ArunasSapitavicius-of7kj Рік тому

    Great video as always, like how you think about the game . However in some spots when u thought a guy hardly even call top pair if u bet 2big and u got snapped by 3rd pairs ir similiar stuff, I think you overestimate how fellow asian players will fold in most spots :)

  • @denniskrook2925
    @denniskrook2925 Рік тому

    Thanks for the long video. Some people are saying no persons are beating the rake in 200NL. Do you know if that is correct, and if it is the same at for example 10nl, 25nl, 50nl and 100nl?

    • @YolanCohenPoker
      @YolanCohenPoker  Рік тому +2

      I think its really hard to win without rb in 100nl/200 specially zoom. But its doable.
      Im be on 20k hands all played in videos for the en channel and fr channel on nl200. 10nl-50nl are beatable without rb

    • @denniskrook2925
      @denniskrook2925 Рік тому

      @@YolanCohenPoker Thanks. For the last 6 months my bankroll was quite stable. Trying to make the transition from 10nl to 25nl. But seems i am having a bad run every time I trie it. But maybe I am not good enough. I will keep on studing and see how far I am coming. Started with 50nl on GG 1.5 years ago. Current at 2700.

    • @denniskrook2925
      @denniskrook2925 Рік тому

      And my rake back is very low. I thing that is because GG is paying taxes to the Dutch covernment. When dutch players could play at partypoker (two years ago) i got 1 buyin rake back per week. And at GG its only 1/3 buyin. And both sites claims it is 20% :)

  • @mikekuznetsov4993
    @mikekuznetsov4993 Рік тому

    Hey! Nice vid, what did you mean about sizing bigger when there are no draws instead of two FD's? Happened at around 1:51:00

    • @YolanCohenPoker
      @YolanCohenPoker  Рік тому

      In theory you should use bigger sizing on turn having 2 flush draw, due to less range EQ decrease for the IP players.
      It depends on the texture tho.

  • @user-ts3yp7zs8e
    @user-ts3yp7zs8e Рік тому

    I like this video!!!!

  • @kevinlacoste9984
    @kevinlacoste9984 Рік тому

    Plus de contenu comme ça c’est de l’eau benite

  • @SUB-tf9om
    @SUB-tf9om Рік тому

    GG200NL is full of nits 😂😂

  • @zanama7177
    @zanama7177 Рік тому +1

  • @italiandutyy4962
    @italiandutyy4962 Рік тому

    how many bb/100 you can have in nl 200 pool here? nice video !

    • @BlazedBeat
      @BlazedBeat Рік тому +1

      gg is very marginal wr. top 10 regs are probably having a wr of 1-2bb/100 due the high rake. there is some additonal rakeback tho to consider.

  • @Mauricio-kf8qx
    @Mauricio-kf8qx 7 місяців тому

    1:17:52 how tf do u find that min raise bluff😮

    • @YolanCohenPoker
      @YolanCohenPoker  7 місяців тому

      Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t!

  • @user-nc3uo6tc5j
    @user-nc3uo6tc5j Рік тому

    Have you ever thought that this disclosure might reduce your winrate?

    • @YolanCohenPoker
      @YolanCohenPoker  Рік тому +1

      It might but it helps people getting better and going pro/win more money, so im fine with that

  • @Mvdd1
    @Mvdd1 10 місяців тому

    i totally didnt understand what u have said at 1:51 about sizings. Can you write that in comment?

    • @YolanCohenPoker
      @YolanCohenPoker  7 місяців тому +1

      I dont think he has better than 99 and most of this str8 and better hand would reraise me on the turn, so I can cap his range even more

    • @Mvdd1
      @Mvdd1 7 місяців тому

      thank you@@YolanCohenPoker

  • @user-kp4fu9jt7n
    @user-kp4fu9jt7n 2 місяці тому

    why you tank every street in every freaking hand ? ! is this because of the algorithm God favoring

  • @johnrossi7916
    @johnrossi7916 Рік тому

    Do you coach or have a cfp?

  • @_MMWWMM_
    @_MMWWMM_ Рік тому

    1:11:10 did you see the SB cold call? ATs hand

    • @YolanCohenPoker
      @YolanCohenPoker  Рік тому +1

      Yeah that’s a fold , 4x + call is to big , cant call there vs these sizes.
      Glad you arrived at this time :p

    • @_MMWWMM_
      @_MMWWMM_ Рік тому

      ​@@YolanCohenPokeryeah I complete this spot a lot with pp's, suited QT/JT to play with the cold call fish. So 3x it's a call?

    • @_MMWWMM_
      @_MMWWMM_ Рік тому

      What would you 4bet here?

  • @williamwilliams8997
    @williamwilliams8997 Рік тому

    Why are you wearing a mask in the thumbnail? Are you trolling or do you actually think a mask protects you from a virus?
    Great video though! Thanks for uploading such great poker content.