A lawyer comes to court without all his evidence. No wonder why he did not win the case for this man. He's allegedly presenting himself as incompetent.🤷🏾♀️
@@CarrieRay Exactly. She gave him a recess to explain it, then she gave him 72 more hours to explain it. And he'll come up with some sort of excuse for it, I'm sure.....and she'll happily say "Great! We're done then!" I think he did double-charge that $250.00. And he'll get away with it because he and the judge are lawyers.
No Harvey they are not always honest. I've had 2 that were more dishonest than anything. One for divorce and the other to help my brother with his custody case.
If you quote the whoe case at $500 now all a sudden its triple the price I would be pissed to. Tell him here's the $500 and depositions cost and I'm out. Anything else he wpuld eat. Terrible lawyer clearly unorganized, unprepared, and no proper Reciepts or documents! Clearly hes to lazy to earn the money he wants!
Depends. Some sell themselves on “you only pay if we win!” But they are usually taking more from you, and will only take a case they feel will be an easy win.
@@blessedtobealivethere are many, but it's usually things like personal injury cases where money is expected to be won in litigation, if that makes sense.
@@blessedtobealive In reality, they get paid. Because the "write it off", which means they would owe lesser taxes. The class action lawyers the ones who really make the most money.
Any other case. The judge will make the defendant win. The plaintiff doesn't have proof. Didn't even bring his documents. How many times when a plaintiff says they were owed but the PC judge states no proof, no cash.. here is a 180 turn and she sides with the laywer.. this is why some of this is too funny and can't be taken seriously.. just a tv show. Nothing else..
She gave the “Fellow Attorney” 72 hours to come up with why he billed an additional $250, but if this WASNT an Attorney, then she would have ruled. Sorry Judge, but you’re showing bias, which destroys YOUR credibility as an impartial Judge
@christibarrick1768 this is the time to have all the proof as the plaintiff is the one that chooses when to file and go to court so he should be ready with all the documents needed.
She’s given many people time to prove their case/show evidence after the fact. I’ve binge watched every episode they put on UA-cam😂 It’s rare but she does do it😊
A lawyer's job is to be dishonest. They will lie and turn and twist facts to get the best possible outcome for their client, even if they know they are guilty.
Okay, so what happened here was? The lawyer was in the wrong but because he was a lawyer. Not only did this judge not interrupt him. She gave him more time to go outside to look for and/or make up a lie as to whether 250 went. Because she's a lawyer as well. So she was giving him the benefit of the doubt. He came back with nothing, and then she gave him an extra 72 hours to think of a lie. What is disgusting example of judge lawyer bias.
HELL I INVESTED 14MIN 49SEC & STILL DON'T KNOW WHAT THE $250 WAS FOR ....THE PLAINTIFF WASN'T PREPARED THAT'S PROBABLY WHY THE DEFENDANT LOST HIS CASE SMDH.
Milian always so proper and professional in front of litigants like this as opposed to others who she looks down on. Everyone already knows which group of people she looks down on..
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
A lawyer comes to court without all his evidence. No wonder why he did not win the case for this man. He's allegedly presenting himself as incompetent.🤷🏾♀️
the lawyer lost BOTH cases . lets not call him if we need one .
Being that he is a lawyer, she shouldn’t have gave him extra time to provide the emails
He def should have had his ish together
Agree! The average plaintiff is SOL if they don’t have evidence. Seems like she is protecting one of her own which is wrong.
Completely agree he should know better
@@CarrieRay Exactly. She gave him a recess to explain it, then she gave him 72 more hours to explain it.
And he'll come up with some sort of excuse for it, I'm sure.....and she'll happily say "Great! We're done then!"
I think he did double-charge that $250.00. And he'll get away with it because he and the judge are lawyers.
he lost BOTH cases so im sure he will not come up with anything if he could not even do it on the actual day in front of the judge .
And the $250 is still a mystery!
He didn't produce it and the defendant had better things to do with his time.
SO, what was the outcome on the $250 ?????????????
Could possibly have been a net judgement for the plaintiff of $4.00!
The plaintiff won
We don't know. Normally Harvey tells us. Not in this case.
She should have found in the defendants favor on the 250.
i wouldnt hire that lawyer
No Harvey they are not always honest. I've had 2 that were more dishonest than anything. One for divorce and the other to help my brother with his custody case.
Harvey had one simple job at the end of it, but instead chose to talk about lawyer fees or whatever that was!
IMMEDIATELY when plaintiff said he didnt have all 7 bills i knew he was incompetent 😅
10:05 & 10:12 lady in the back is over it 😂
lol good catch.
@@rn6710😂😂
😂
The second eyeroll 🤣
Having a court case isn’t like making a refundable purchase.
I love Judge but she really needs to stop asking questions and then interrupts- here she clearly sided w the atty from first min
She has already read the whole case. She knows the answers to the questions she asks. All judges do.
If you quote the whoe case at $500 now all a sudden its triple the price I would be pissed to. Tell him here's the $500 and depositions cost and I'm out. Anything else he wpuld eat. Terrible lawyer clearly unorganized, unprepared, and no proper Reciepts or documents! Clearly hes to lazy to earn the money he wants!
I always thought you pay a lawyer wether they win or not.🤔
Nope it’s called quid pro quo
With good lawyers, yes. You pay them no matter what because they know their value.
Depends. Some sell themselves on “you only pay if we win!” But they are usually taking more from you, and will only take a case they feel will be an easy win.
How the h€!! is a lawyer not able to provide an accounting 😏
He’s a lawyer and suing for $250 can’t be much of a lawyer ! If h was a good lawyer that would be a drop in the bucket .desperate for money
Wasn't a lot of $$ at stake. Lawyer should have let it go, especially since he blew the case.
You pay your attorney whether you win or lose 🙄
I was about to type the same thing. Some folks...😒😒😒
I thought there were some lawyers that only charge if they win?
@@blessedtobealivethere are many, but it's usually things like personal injury cases where money is expected to be won in litigation, if that makes sense.
@@blessedtobealive In reality, they get paid. Because the "write it off", which means they would owe lesser taxes. The class action lawyers the ones who really make the most money.
@@16MedicRN Even THOSE "only if won" cases have some fees attached to them in the small print.
I think that it was a case of sour grapes by the defendant and his retribution was making a half assed complaint to the bar against the plaintiff.
I think he was trying to avoid going to court again. Like Harvey said at the end, you can contact the Bar to mediate attorney fee disputes.
I believe the plaintiff couldn't provide the proof, saving face and he lost ....
Why does the defendant look so excited to have lost the case 2:49 😂😂😂
He wanted an accounting. And he got it! Except for the 250.
How did the plaintiff pass the bar?
I have had an incompetent lawyer like this fool.
Not everyone is good at what they do, even if
they charge $350. an hour.
So what happened to the lawyers 250 document? Did it ever show up?
The defendant should buy a shirt that fits.
When she holds her head it makes me think she has pain:( How the judges work thru colds too. Wow.
Any other case. The judge will make the defendant win. The plaintiff doesn't have proof. Didn't even bring his documents. How many times when a plaintiff says they were owed but the PC judge states no proof, no cash.. here is a 180 turn and she sides with the laywer.. this is why some of this is too funny and can't be taken seriously.. just a tv show. Nothing else..
Weather in one or lost.He still worked on it , so pay the man
Prepared they are not…
She gave the “Fellow Attorney” 72 hours to come up with why he billed an additional $250, but if this WASNT an Attorney, then she would have ruled.
Sorry Judge, but you’re showing bias, which destroys YOUR credibility as an impartial Judge
🙄 Untrue. She gives people the chance to find evidence or proof all the time…
@christibarrick1768 this is the time to have all the proof as the plaintiff is the one that chooses when to file and go to court so he should be ready with all the documents needed.
@@christibarrick1768
I came here to say just this!
She’s given many people time to prove their case/show evidence after the fact. I’ve binge watched every episode they put on UA-cam😂 It’s rare but she does do it😊
@@chrissygoodrich1856 Not on the Plaintiff side
Of all the people, a lawyer with no exhibit A😂😂😂 i wonder why they lost their case😂😂😂
Wasted court time for $250
Dang no after credits result? I wanted to know what that $250 was for 😢
The defendant had an odd presentation, especially how he bounced into court grinning. Not surprising that the neighbors have issues with him!
A lawyer's job is to be dishonest. They will lie and turn and twist facts to get the best possible outcome for their client, even if they know they are guilty.
I don't care about this case. I want to know about that lawsuit... sounds wild.
A real lawyer for $254 are we serious here come on
Okay, so what happened here was? The lawyer was in the wrong but because he was a lawyer. Not only did this judge not interrupt him. She gave him more time to go outside to look for and/or make up a lie as to whether 250 went. Because she's a lawyer as well. So she was giving him the benefit of the doubt. He came back with nothing, and then she gave him an extra 72 hours to think of a lie. What is disgusting example of judge lawyer bias.
4:14 All those young people in the back wanna kill themselves from boredom 🤣🤣🤣 All they here is bla bla bla
Rats, no follow up whether the attorney could account for the 250 charge
The defendant looks like Darth Vader with his helmet off.....
PLAINTIFF:
“I was a bad lawyer who lost your case. Now pay me”
God dayum. Whos the blonde with dark red lipstick behind the plaintiff
There she is again! Who is the lady on the glasses and grey and pink shirt. First row behind the plaintiff. She's in sooooo many episodes!
Non working actors and actresses will often appear in shows like this.
Why didn't she ask for the banks information on the $250 check to see who cashed it
Lawyer licking his fingers 😋😋😋😋😋
HELL I INVESTED 14MIN 49SEC & STILL DON'T KNOW WHAT THE $250 WAS FOR ....THE PLAINTIFF WASN'T PREPARED THAT'S PROBABLY WHY THE DEFENDANT LOST HIS CASE SMDH.
Another boring case.....I invented a Twice Baked Stuffed Pepper recipe and am looking forward to dinner 😊
Yum !!!🫑🌶
You mean a Twice Baked Stuffed Capsicum. 🤣🤣
@@mickm6309 it was a sweet red pepper, not 🥵🔥🥵
@@Bebedollie it was! I'll be making it, very soon
@@LoveChild71 We call Bell Peppers, Capsicum.
Lawyer dude has a lot of dandruff…. And badly should just shave that Homer Simpson hair do
Terrace Bradley Nathan Wade Fani Willis =not honest
💯 The text messages and phone records PROVE they both perjured themselves. They should both be criminally charged and lose their law licenses.
Milian always so proper and professional in front of litigants like this as opposed to others who she looks down on. Everyone already knows which group of people she looks down on..
But , Sir I've seen her be mean to all kinds of people. Don't feel offended. I can understand that you feel upset, but it's good to be forgiving 💞💕🫶
She's pretty much the same for everyone, she's way harder on lawyers who fail to provide information that she needs because they should know better.
Yup, she looks down on idiots.
Exact she only
Looks down on absolutely idiots!! Funny if you feel offended 😉
Yea she is harder on idiots and manipulators.
Apparently the defendant is related to Donald Trump.
Apparently not.
No Comment
yes get your ducks in a row