I don’t know? Do you comply when someone, even the police is barking commands/orders at you? 5 cops pull over a guy for a seatbelt infraction. Ok. Vehicle has dark tinted windows so cops have x-ray vision now.
"COPA video shows Dexter Reed shooting at Chicago police firing 11 rounds, cops fire back 96 times in 41 seconds after he shot officer". Fixed your title for you @Chicago Sun-Times.
@@smokedravioli3208Something that always wound me up about conservatives is how anti-big-government they are until it comes to bootlicking police. There’s a lot of insanity on the other side, but the cognitive dissonance of a group to support 2A then submit every liberty imaginable to a badge is outstanding.
@@user-asa187 literally what i'm saying. As a leftist I'm pro 2A. I don't understand how someone can be pro2A and pro police at the same time. Who do you think is gonna be the ones to infringe on it? They talk abt needing an AR to defend against tyranny, but they defend the very agents of tyranny in the same breath.
Were they cops? Plain clothes people pointing guns....hhmmhh😮we need reassessments before thinking our thoughts are the same as others being rushed with noise, confusion & threats... Think ....😊....no excuses but when you throw people in a state of confusion you cause them to do weird stuff. Ask those in psychology who are too afraid to be honest....maybe they fear for their lives too ...
@@cayennesinivassinel6977I guess identifying themselves as cops and the cop cars with red white and blue lights wasn't enough. People like you are remedial at best
:015 you can see the officer on the passenger side of the car get shot before anything else happens. The officers are no strangers to getting shot at, they have learned how to survive.
They say cops pulled him over because he wasn't wearing a seat belt. Then they say he refused to roll the tinted windows down. The windows were tinted very dark, so how could they see if he was wearing a seat belt? Is it possible the police fired the first shot? Why does Chicago have a history of white police torture of Black men? Can anyone ever believe Chicago police? Are we in for more riots and Black people demanding justice and freedom from police brutality? NO JUSTICE NO PEACE-NO RACIST POLICE!
I think we are all smart. He was facing a prior gun charge, and this one was definitely going to get him jail time, and he wasn't built for jail. Most of these street kids aren't.
They say cops pulled him over because he wasn't wearing a seat belt. Then they say he refused to roll the tinted windows down. The windows were tinted very dark, so how could they see if he was wearing a seat belt? Is it possible the police fired the first shot? Why does Chicago have a history of white police torture of Black men? Can anyone ever believe Chicago police? Are we in for more riots and Black people demanding justice and freedom from police brutality? NO JUSTICE NO PEACE-NO RACIST POLICE!
In Cook County with red flag laws, FOIDs and all their other gun control? For a perpetrator that had his FOID card revoked and was arrested while trying to enter a music festival with a loaded handgun? Who was killed firing on police WHILE HE WAS AWAITING TRIAL FOR ILLEGALLY CARRYING A FIREARM? Gee, I couldn't possibly think of anything that could fix that... “Prior to the shooting, Reed had been arrested twice in a matter of months and was awaiting trial in a pending gun case, according to Cook County court records.” "An empty gun was recovered at the scene" "He fired 11 rounds at these police officers before he was eventually killed.” “He was first arrested on April 20, 2023, after allegedly walking out of the Saks Fifth Avenue along the Magnificent Mile while wearing a $950 shirt he hadn’t paid for, according to an arrest report. He was charged with a misdemeanor count of retail theft that was soon tossed out." " Then on July 13, 2023, he was arrested again when officers allegedly found him carrying a loaded handgun while entering the Windy City Smokeout music festival outside the United Center, an arrest report states. He had no concealed carry license, and his firearm owners identification card had been revoked.” “After initially being charged with a felony count of unlawful use of a weapon, he was indicted on additional gun-related felonies, court records show. That case was pending when he was shot and killed." Read that again too, what he was pending trial for... “carrying a loaded handgun while entering the Windy City Smokeout music festival". He was very possibly a few steps away from being a possible “mass shooter” in a public space. He had multiple felony indictments related to firearms. Maybe Chicago should throw some more gun control at it, it's working right? Those officers knew who he was and what he was on pre-trial for and the suggestion that he was some "innocent black man being rousted for his seatbelt" is flagrantly false. He was a criminal who fired on police and was killed, justly. *Edit* Here is a video that shows why so many shots are fired even when it "appears" they are down. In another heavy gun control place, NY. ua-cam.com/video/5Ib94o7p5FM/v-deo.htmlsi=6BUV7z2OQM9192YO Another that shows why they need to be so aggressive when they are dealing with known criminals. ua-cam.com/video/OgNNlMvrBoc/v-deo.htmlsi=pR9hXluvXRBVF3UF Ever wonder why they don't believe violent criminals when they say they are complying? ua-cam.com/video/_GR7UiLw9Ww/v-deo.htmlsi=qA8LiED3pwdF-6TC Here are some statistics from Chicago. heyjackass.com/ In Chicago police shot and killed just 5 people in 2023 out of the 576 total shootings that resulted in death. In Chicago police shot and injured just 5 people in 2023 out of the 2,501 shootings where they were wounded. Sorry ACABS, you are wrong. I guess this one doesn't fit the narrative since he was Hispanic even though the police fired over 100 shots, there was no gun. ua-cam.com/video/_ctpOmmXLdk/v-deo.htmlsi=9kobV7LgiSjjhxha
Lmao u pulled a whole report and is stating it like these are your findings and facts fucking cornball. No one ever confirmed he even shot not confirmed that he shot 11 times which seems stupid just to get out unarmed and still get killed. Most likely he was wrong on his part but don’t just don’t to conclusions because u ain’t got a single fact
Even if all that is true, the police are not extra-judicial executioners! They say cops pulled him over because he wasn't wearing a seat belt. Then they say he refused to roll the tinted windows down. The windows were tinted very dark, so how could they see if he was wearing a seat belt? Is it possible the police fired the first shot? Why does Chicago have a history of white police torture of Black men? Can anyone ever believe Chicago police? Are we in for more riots and Black people demanding justice and freedom from police brutality? NO JUSTICE NO PEACE-NO RACIST POLICE!
How they've seen that he had not wear seatbelt if it was so tinted? They also got night vision goggles from military? Also, he wasn't justly killed. It's up to to judge to decide. Not the cops. Also, 100 shots in the residential should be considered endangering public. Where all those bullets landed? Law and order, yet you don't care about either.
This man isn't the victim he shot first, so I'm guessing you would rather all officers be dead than the criminal? I Wonder what happened to get he to stop his vehicle, it appears you're only showing a small part of what happened.
@@nuvicamnewsnow8057 stay focused, I know you have limited ability to critical think and that prevents you from such things but we’re talking about the police in this situation.
Chicago is getting what it asked for as well. They say cops pulled him over because he wasn't wearing a seat belt. Then they say he refused to roll the tinted windows down. The windows were tinted very dark, so how could they see if he was wearing a seat belt? Is it possible the police fired the first shot? Why does Chicago have a history of white police torture of Black men? Can anyone ever believe Chicago police? Are we in for more riots and Black people demanding justice and freedom from police brutality? NO JUSTICE NO PEACE-NO RACIST POLICE!
Wow! Sad you speak like this when you wasn’t there to witness what happened. The video clearly does not show the young man shooting first. Where’s that part of the video. If you don’t have anything positive to say don’t say anything at all
I'm sorry that Dexter Reed died and I feel for his family but his death was preventable had he followed the officers orders and not opened fire on them first. The response may not have been proportionate but at that point the officers knew that they were dealing with a gunman who had already fired on them. It wasn't going to end well once those shots were fired.
@@Traumadj allegedly for not wearing a seatbelt, which I don't agree with stopping someone for. But, even if you or I or Dexter Reed disagree with the police, the place to challenge that is the courtroom, not the street.
They say cops pulled him over because he wasn't wearing a seat belt. Then they say he refused to roll the tinted windows down. The windows were tinted very dark, so how could they see if he was wearing a seat belt? Is it possible the police fired the first shot? Why does Chicago have a history of white police torture of Black men? Can anyone ever believe Chicago police? Are we in for more riots and Black people demanding justice and freedom from police brutality? NO JUSTICE NO PEACE-NO RACIST POLICE!
@@2inchesfromthegroundthey were going to arrest him because they knew he was a criminal with a gun. Really pretty simple. He chose a shootout instead.
lol I don’t see it either. People make anything up! At first he was about to try to bust the glass with his baton then he put his gun to the window. After that shots was fired but can see from where!!!
This is a very clear video that even the blind can see what happened. To say you and only you see it's the Cops who shot first proves that nothing will allow you to see the truth and that helps convince everyone your ignorant and incapable of rational thought,
Damn 96 times is a hell of a lot for one shot. When he dropped behind the car like that when he got out of it, you kind of knew it was a wrap at that point. RIP Dexter Reed. I do wish he had listened to the officers and not shot at them, then he probably could've went home to see his family.
We have seen only the videos that police department wants public to see. If you remember Houston 5 case where Gerald Goins murdered whole Tuttle family and in first is was hero police officers …. and because independent investigation …. Truth get public and Gerald Goines is not a hero but convicted felon…..
They're saying the cops were wearing street clothes and didn't identify themselves. He may have thought he was being robbed. Do the police have the footage leading up to this escalation or when they first pulled him over?
Mmmm, the fact they tacked on who shot first at the end of the title makes it feel like they begrudgingly threw it in there against their will. If they wanted to be truly honest they could have worded it much better.
Maybe because he was involved in many other crimes and currently out on bail for illegally posseing a gun 😂 the fact that this is your argument instead of placing blame on the loser who chose to shoot at cops 11 times is wild. Such a victim mentality you have and it's very sad
Tactical Teams have missions. They’re not supposed to do traffic control. They’re not meant for neighborhood policing. Don’t be fooled by the narrative. Jump out boys are for Sex Trafficking & Narcotics Trafficking.
The cost of ammunition wasted, bad; the court costs saved, good. Preventing further crime (including potential harm, or worse, to others) by someone who was clearly headed down that path, priceless. The black lives that matter here are the ones Dexter was endangering by having illegal weapons, stealing, and racing around the neighborhood with a head covering clearly meant to hide his identity. Not to mention the black cops who are trying to preserve the peace. If this guy had not been out on bail, he would have had time to reflect, maybe correct his path. Instead he chose the thug life. It’s hard to have sympathy.
All this over a Seatbelt, And how the Hell did they see a seat belt violation thru the dark tented windows? You got to wonder what was the real reason the man was pulled over.
Your absolutely correct! If they wouldn't have been yelling profanities it would had been a way calmer situation. And he actually let the window down and asked them what's up?
From what I read, the report initially said he was pulled over for not wearing a seatbelt. How would they know that? Tint too dark The officer who was shot reportedly did not shoot his weapon.
They say cops pulled him over because he wasn't wearing a seat belt. Then they say he refused to roll the tinted windows down. The windows were tinted very dark, so how could they see if he was wearing a seat belt? Is it possible the police fired the first shot? Why does Chicago have a history of white police torture of Black men? Can anyone ever believe Chicago police? Are we in for more riots and Black people demanding justice and freedom from police brutality? NO JUSTICE NO PEACE-NO RACIST POLICE!
@@prettykitty724because the front window was not tinted, and if it was, that would have been another reason to pull him over. Look at you keyboard lawyers trying to find literally anyway to justify that clown getting knocked off.
The tourniquet application was beyond ridiculous... "Insert the injured limb through the loop in the band and position the tourniquet 2-3" above the bleeding site. If the most proximal bleeding site is not readily identifiable, place the tourniquet as high as possible on the limb." You do not position the tourniquet at the proximal humerus for a hand/wrist arterial trauma... You are establishing the point of amputation in the field when you apply a tourniquet, by applying it that far up the limb makes it more difficult to assess the effectiveness of the tourniquet application and starves a tremendous amount of viable tissue that should never be at risk. I'm not even sure that the wound warranted a tourniquet, direct pressure may have been more than adequate for the type and volume of hemorrhage.
Anyone that was in the boy scouts, let alone the military, knows that a tourniquet should ONLY be used if pressure bandages cannot stop the bleeding. We used to be told to loosen the tourniquet every - I think fifteen minutes - in order to avoid the necessity of amputation of the limb, due to blood poisoning or whatever. I believe we Marines were told (back in the late fifties) to drop the loosening from consideration because allowing more blood loss each time may kill the injured person. A close call, but since most of use don't know how much blood a person requires to survive, the thought is better to risk the limb than the life. Were I in that position, I might be tempted to loosen at least once, if the known loss of blood was not very significant yet. Of course, that's only if it was just me there and no witnesses of my action...
It's not over yet. They say cops pulled him over because he wasn't wearing a seat belt. Then they say he refused to roll the tinted windows down. The windows were tinted very dark, so how could they see if he was wearing a seat belt? Is it possible the police fired the first shot? Why does Chicago have a history of white police torture of Black men? Can anyone ever believe Chicago police? Are we in for more riots and Black people demanding justice and freedom from police brutality? NO JUSTICE NO PEACE-NO RACIST POLICE!
the first 80 shots don't count as he was clearly alive, their job is to eliminate possible risk and clearly he was still alive until the last 10 shots! he would be alive right now but he made the decision
It’s not about democrats or republicans. It’s about what’s right. Ppl kill me always comparing one against the other. Both parties have faults. Period!!!
Everyone on this thread is so hyper-focused on the perp and the cops, that they completely forgot about the collateral around them. Those cops were shooting from every which direction, a few even had the apartments in their backdrop as they were firing. Unreal ignorance.
the moment he decided to fire at the officers, he sealed his fate, no excuses. of course, there are always people who want to do second guess behind a screen I mean, what do you want the officers to do, ask him "please don't shoot us. pretty please, I will treat you candy in return"?
My question is shouldn't uniformed officers be the ones who pull drivers over for a seatbelt violation? And why did they box him in for a measly seatbelt violation and draw their weapons? And we're talking about Chicago, one of the leading cities when it comes to gun violence, so who's to say whether or not the driver thought these hooded undercover officers were criminals trying to carjack his vehicle? Being they were undercover officers they should have repeatedly stated they were the police to remove all doubt.
They say cops pulled him over because he wasn't wearing a seat belt. Then they say he refused to roll the tinted windows down. The windows were tinted very dark, so how could they see if he was wearing a seat belt? Is it possible the police fired the first shot? Why does Chicago have a history of white police torture of Black men? Can anyone ever believe Chicago police? Are we in for more riots and Black people demanding justice and freedom from police brutality? NO JUSTICE NO PEACE-NO RACIST POLICE!
@@Digger-Nick By the same token and warped logic, does this give police, or the FBI for that matter, the right to pull over someone like Hunter Biden, who likewise is a felon with a gun charge, for a minor traffic violation and shove 5 guns in his face while escalating the situation and shoot him 140 times if he ever steps out of line?
Dude was a felon and wasn’t supposed to have a gun anyway. His mom made him sound like he was Mr. Rogers and going out for a nice little ride in his spiffy new car😢
To everyone who is saying why officers fired 96 shots at the suspect, it's obvious that the perp was shooting at the officers first (we can see at 0:17 into this video) and they were stuck in a crossfire with the suspect. But once they shot at the suspect more than a dozen times, why did they keep shooting, just pause the video at 0:41, the suspect still had the strength to drive the car after his vehicle was riddled with bullets. I am sure not all the bullets hit him but he was probably shot at least five times at that point. He was still alive and dangerous and officers feared that he can still flee the scene and try shooting at the officers again. That's what drugs do, they give people superhuman, supernatural strenght and terrible behavior. Cops need to make sure the suspect is not moving anymore and is in handcuffs before they can secure the scene. Even people who are already handcuffed are still capable of doing terrible things, that's why cops were yelling at the perp to put his hands behind his back and not to move after they shot him and after he was cuffed. His behavior was proportional to the use of force these officers used. One of the officers was even shot in the arm due to the suspect's reckless behavior.
The usual dangerous ignorant suspect is a white supremacist, right? They say cops pulled him over because he wasn't wearing a seat belt. Then they say he refused to roll the tinted windows down. The windows were tinted very dark, so how could they see if he was wearing a seat belt? Is it possible the police fired the first shot? Why does Chicago have a history of white police torture of Black men? Can anyone ever believe Chicago police? Are we in for more riots and Black people demanding justice and freedom from police brutality? NO JUSTICE NO PEACE-NO RACIST POLICE!
96 shots is nothing! Did u watch how fast it all happened?? You don’t know if the guy can shoot back when he still is moving and shot at you first and might easily still kill someone.
The threat had to be suppressed and then neutralized and that threat was only finally neutralized as the last few shots were fired, presuming the vehicle absorbed the vast majority of the bullets. Can anybody tell me if the criminal's 11 rounds that he fired at the cops are counted in the '96' claimed in the media to be fired by the cops or are there 107 rounds in total? It's a little hard to count.
I need to see the body cam from the officer who was shot. He was one of two closest to the suspect and should provide much more clear footage of how he was shot by the suspect. It’s rather interesting that they would use the perspective of an officer that was so far away. The officer shot was holding his weapon in his right hand and shot in his left. I’m wondering if he shot himself running off.
Bro committed suicide . What had he done to think his life was over ? Going to jail for a while is not the worst thing that can happen to you. There is always tomorrow.
You can clearly see the black cop getting hit first.. my only objections is that i never heard anyone identifying themselves as police unmarked police car no uniformed officers.. the first one to get hit is a "brotha"..so the argument will be made that maybe he thought he was being robbed 😂
They say cops pulled him over because he wasn't wearing a seat belt. Then they say he refused to roll the tinted windows down. The windows were tinted very dark, so how could they see if he was wearing a seat belt? Is it possible the police fired the first shot? Why does Chicago have a history of white police torture of Black men? Can anyone ever believe Chicago police? Are we in for more riots and Black people demanding justice and freedom from police brutality? NO JUSTICE NO PEACE-NO RACIST POLICE!
Why are we not asking the mother why she didn’t teach her son to obey the law and show respect for authority? The cops did their jobs. She’s the one that failed.
At 0:17 the black cop with the hoodie puts the barrel of his gun (right-hand) on the passenger-side windshield. 1 sec later shots are fired. Hoodie cop gets hit just above his left wrist which appears to be below the passenger-side window. So who shot first? This is like a plane crash investigation. No assumptions just physical and video evidence.
Uhh, let me get this right. We know the perp had a gun AND FIRED IT and wounded an officer. WTH ??? What do you expect the cops to do? If they did NOT use every available source they could to stop that shooter and someone else got shot - maybe killed - would you please explain why to the victim's wife, mother, father, son, daughter, etc.? THIS IS A VERY GOOD LEARNING THING FOR ALL OF US: ALWAYS DO WHAT THE COP TELLS YOU TO DO. You can hire a lawyer later.
The number of shots is irrelevant when there are multiple guns being fired , if they kept him in prison for illegally carrying a firearm in a city that banned guns then he’d still be alive , oh well, I hope the black community is watching what these democrat policies continue to do to their neighborhoods
Had prior records of being caught with a weapon illegally. All it takes is a quick search of the license plates in the system to pull prior offenses up. Plus the area in which Reed was pulled over is known for traffic stops in which the civilian fire weapons back at police. With all this being said, why wouldn’t you draw your gun out when doing a traffic stop in such a shit neighborhood? It may not be common wherever you live but it is in Chicago.
Protocol is when someone refuses to comply, which is usually the signal they are about to do something really stupid. Would you want to be a cop in this fucked up world? I sure as hell wouldn't want to be one. In fact they couldn't pay me enough!!!
@@Locateclosewithdestroy: it looked very clear that plan was to kill him in the car. Magdump x5. I wonder how many people was wounded on the background? This will be an another European police training video how to not do police work. Us police is only 400 times more deadly than their Scandinavian counterparts.
Four police - presumably highly trained - needed nearly 100 shots to take down a threat and you think you can protect yourself with a handgun? Not likely.
It's hard to protect yourself against a mob hit. They say cops pulled him over because he wasn't wearing a seat belt. Then they say he refused to roll the tinted windows down. The windows were tinted very dark, so how could they see if he was wearing a seat belt? Is it possible the police fired the first shot? Why does Chicago have a history of white police torture of Black men? Can anyone ever believe Chicago police? Are we in for more riots and Black people demanding justice and freedom from police brutality? NO JUSTICE NO PEACE-NO RACIST POLICE!
THE SAD PART IS HIS MOTHER WANTS TO KNOW WHY SO MANY SHOTS, NOT WHY YOUR SON HAS A GUN AND WOULDN'T OBEY SIMPLE COMMANDS AND DECIDED TO SHOOT
I don’t know? Do you comply when someone, even the police is barking commands/orders at you? 5 cops pull over a guy for a seatbelt infraction. Ok. Vehicle has dark tinted windows so cops have x-ray vision now.
Mama smells money....
@@margaritasanchez455😂
And a dozen of ambulance chasing attorneys are waiting at her door steps...
@@hudsonchnah just ben crump
"COPA video shows Dexter Reed shooting at Chicago police firing 11 rounds, cops fire back 96 times in 41 seconds after he shot officer". Fixed your title for you @Chicago Sun-Times.
Life Hack.....
Do not fire at officers, it never ever ends well.
He didn't they fired first.
@@kc4626
Yeah No.
What's the point of having a firearm if you can't defend yourself against the state?
@@smokedravioli3208Something that always wound me up about conservatives is how anti-big-government they are until it comes to bootlicking police. There’s a lot of insanity on the other side, but the cognitive dissonance of a group to support 2A then submit every liberty imaginable to a badge is outstanding.
@@user-asa187 literally what i'm saying. As a leftist I'm pro 2A. I don't understand how someone can be pro2A and pro police at the same time. Who do you think is gonna be the ones to infringe on it? They talk abt needing an AR to defend against tyranny, but they defend the very agents of tyranny in the same breath.
the media is trying to make him the new George Floyd. pathetic.
Just in time for some more election meddling by the left
I'm honestly just pleasantly surprised that people are beginning to see through the media's lies.
This is sooooo fake I can give you 10 reasons.
@@alexhudson- if you had 10 reasons you would've given them. 😂
@@hfhxgdytfyguyghfyfhrbt6gxc749 There's 10 people in the video wearing 10 different outfits that are not real police uniforms.
What do you expect when you shoot at cops?
Were they cops? Plain clothes people pointing guns....hhmmhh😮we need reassessments before thinking our thoughts are the same as others being rushed with noise, confusion & threats...
Think ....😊....no excuses but when you throw people in a state of confusion you cause them to do weird stuff. Ask those in psychology who are too afraid to be honest....maybe they fear for their lives too ...
@@cayennesinivassinel6977 Yes. They were cops. No excuses.
@@cayennesinivassinel6977what a loser comment 😂
@@cayennesinivassinel6977I guess identifying themselves as cops and the cop cars with red white and blue lights wasn't enough. People like you are remedial at best
@@cayennesinivassinel6977we are literally watching police cam footage you bozo.. yes they "were cops"
:015 you can see the officer on the passenger side of the car get shot before anything else happens.
The officers are no strangers to getting shot at, they have learned how to survive.
You're right. It was quick though. Almost couldn't see it. Only a moron is going to fire when 4 cops have you surrounded!
They say cops pulled him over because he wasn't wearing a seat belt. Then they say he refused to roll the tinted windows down. The windows were tinted very dark, so how could they see if he was wearing a seat belt? Is it possible the police fired the first shot? Why does Chicago have a history of white police torture of Black men? Can anyone ever believe Chicago police? Are we in for more riots and Black people demanding justice and freedom from police brutality? NO JUSTICE NO PEACE-NO RACIST POLICE!
Criminal wanted to shoot any witnesses
I think we are all smart. He was facing a prior gun charge, and this one was definitely going to get him jail time, and he wasn't built for jail. Most of these street kids aren't.
Thank you CPD! Sorry the officers had to go through this.
They say cops pulled him over because he wasn't wearing a seat belt. Then they say he refused to roll the tinted windows down. The windows were tinted very dark, so how could they see if he was wearing a seat belt? Is it possible the police fired the first shot? Why does Chicago have a history of white police torture of Black men? Can anyone ever believe Chicago police? Are we in for more riots and Black people demanding justice and freedom from police brutality? NO JUSTICE NO PEACE-NO RACIST POLICE!
In Cook County with red flag laws, FOIDs and all their other gun control? For a perpetrator that had his FOID card revoked and was arrested while trying to enter a music festival with a loaded handgun? Who was killed firing on police WHILE HE WAS AWAITING TRIAL FOR ILLEGALLY CARRYING A FIREARM?
Gee, I couldn't possibly think of anything that could fix that...
“Prior to the shooting, Reed had been arrested twice in a matter of months and was awaiting trial in a pending gun case, according to Cook County court records.”
"An empty gun was recovered at the scene"
"He fired 11 rounds at these police officers before he was eventually killed.”
“He was first arrested on April 20, 2023, after allegedly walking out of the Saks Fifth Avenue along the Magnificent Mile while wearing a $950 shirt he hadn’t paid for, according to an arrest report. He was charged with a misdemeanor count of retail theft that was soon tossed out."
" Then on July 13, 2023, he was arrested again when officers allegedly found him carrying a loaded handgun while entering the Windy City Smokeout music festival outside the United Center, an arrest report states. He had no concealed carry license, and his firearm owners identification card had been revoked.”
“After initially being charged with a felony count of unlawful use of a weapon, he was indicted on additional gun-related felonies, court records show. That case was pending when he was shot and killed."
Read that again too, what he was pending trial for... “carrying a loaded handgun while entering the Windy City Smokeout music festival". He was very possibly a few steps away from being a possible “mass shooter” in a public space. He had multiple felony indictments related to firearms.
Maybe Chicago should throw some more gun control at it, it's working right? Those officers knew who he was and what he was on pre-trial for and the suggestion that he was some "innocent black man being rousted for his seatbelt" is flagrantly false. He was a criminal who fired on police and was killed, justly.
*Edit*
Here is a video that shows why so many shots are fired even when it "appears" they are down. In another heavy gun control place, NY.
ua-cam.com/video/5Ib94o7p5FM/v-deo.htmlsi=6BUV7z2OQM9192YO
Another that shows why they need to be so aggressive when they are dealing with known criminals. ua-cam.com/video/OgNNlMvrBoc/v-deo.htmlsi=pR9hXluvXRBVF3UF
Ever wonder why they don't believe violent criminals when they say they are complying? ua-cam.com/video/_GR7UiLw9Ww/v-deo.htmlsi=qA8LiED3pwdF-6TC
Here are some statistics from Chicago. heyjackass.com/
In Chicago police shot and killed just 5 people in 2023 out of the 576 total shootings that resulted in death.
In Chicago police shot and injured just 5 people in 2023 out of the 2,501 shootings where they were wounded.
Sorry ACABS, you are wrong.
I guess this one doesn't fit the narrative since he was Hispanic even though the police fired over 100 shots, there was no gun. ua-cam.com/video/_ctpOmmXLdk/v-deo.htmlsi=9kobV7LgiSjjhxha
Lmao u pulled a whole report and is stating it like these are your findings and facts fucking cornball. No one ever confirmed he even shot not confirmed that he shot 11 times which seems stupid just to get out unarmed and still get killed. Most likely he was wrong on his part but don’t just don’t to conclusions because u ain’t got a single fact
Wow, a long rap sheet...
Absolutely!
Even if all that is true, the police are not extra-judicial executioners! They say cops pulled him over because he wasn't wearing a seat belt. Then they say he refused to roll the tinted windows down. The windows were tinted very dark, so how could they see if he was wearing a seat belt? Is it possible the police fired the first shot? Why does Chicago have a history of white police torture of Black men? Can anyone ever believe Chicago police? Are we in for more riots and Black people demanding justice and freedom from police brutality? NO JUSTICE NO PEACE-NO RACIST POLICE!
How they've seen that he had not wear seatbelt if it was so tinted? They also got night vision goggles from military?
Also, he wasn't justly killed. It's up to to judge to decide. Not the cops.
Also, 100 shots in the residential should be considered endangering public. Where all those bullets landed?
Law and order, yet you don't care about either.
This man isn't the victim he shot first, so I'm guessing you would rather all officers be dead than the criminal? I Wonder what happened to get he to stop his vehicle, it appears you're only showing a small part of what happened.
Yes
It’s not that they shouldn’t have fired back, but 96? Overkill literally
What warrants that?
Very delusional way to put it….. but okkkk 🤡
They stopped shooting right after he hit the ground. Gtfoh
The guy didn't have a gun and why are plain clothes cop stopping a person for a seat belt infraction and not identifying themselves as cops
Why did they fire 96 times? They ran out of ammo.
Because 97 is crazy
Because the criminal was still shooting and later because the police didn't know if the criminal was still armed.
Why shoot at police over a traffic ticket?
96 shots isn’t too much even there’s Multiple officers shooting, Criminal is still armed and shooting… and the criminal didn’t get shot 96 times
@@nunzi83so why did COPA strip them of their police powers? Hmmmm….
The unedited video shows the assailant initially firing 11 shots at police.
We be doing this to ourselves smh 😢
Did you take time to ask yourself why is a tactical squad stopping someone for not wearing a seatbelt? A TACTICAL SQUAD.
Its whydeez fawlt
@@2inchesfromtheground no
300+ million of us
and we do not ask, nor care
OBEY, or meet same fate... so simple
@@2inchesfromthegroundgood thing it was a tactical squad tho 😅
Big facts
Self defense on the cops end. The people inthe car are not victims
✅
At the end of the day, the good guys go home!!!1
A good guys like Jason VanDuke ?
@@nuvicamnewsnow8057good guys got stripped of their police powers 😅😅😅😅😅
You don't have to simp for the police.
@@RudyMagnus; Yes I do. My property taxes and police department portion of is higher than average police officers yearly income.
@@nuvicamnewsnow8057 stay focused, I know you have limited ability to critical think and that prevents you from such things but we’re talking about the police in this situation.
Yelling dont move after shooting him 96 times is crazy
It was don't fucking move!!!! They made sure he wouldn't ever move again.
He must been on something if he was able to get out of the vehicle after all those shots and try to shoot and run from his vehicle
No one said cops were intelligent. they just have to do what they're told
@TYang3D They deal with the dumbest, most dangerous, most evil entities on the planet.
@@foxfly23 politicians? Since when?
"VIDEO SHOWS LAW ENFORCEMENT BEING FIRED UPON" .. THERE I FIXED THE HEADLINE FOR YOU
Perp Got Exactly What He Asked For!
Yay bootlicker yay
you a punk
Chicago is getting what it asked for as well. They say cops pulled him over because he wasn't wearing a seat belt. Then they say he refused to roll the tinted windows down. The windows were tinted very dark, so how could they see if he was wearing a seat belt? Is it possible the police fired the first shot? Why does Chicago have a history of white police torture of Black men? Can anyone ever believe Chicago police? Are we in for more riots and Black people demanding justice and freedom from police brutality? NO JUSTICE NO PEACE-NO RACIST POLICE!
Wow! Sad you speak like this when you wasn’t there to witness what happened. The video clearly does not show the young man shooting first. Where’s that part of the video. If you don’t have anything positive to say don’t say anything at all
Prayers for that officer who was hit.
I'm sorry that Dexter Reed died and I feel for his family but his death was preventable had he followed the officers orders and not opened fire on them first. The response may not have been proportionate but at that point the officers knew that they were dealing with a gunman who had already fired on them. It wasn't going to end well once those shots were fired.
Every action cause a reaction right? So what was the first bs action
@@Traumadj allegedly for not wearing a seatbelt, which I don't agree with stopping someone for. But, even if you or I or Dexter Reed disagree with the police, the place to challenge that is the courtroom, not the street.
@@gwheelock911 Timothy McVeigh- caught for no license plates
@@gwheelock911 Catch em alone in the streets, they arent so confident when they have no back up to bully you with
@@TYang3Dword, the streets, thug life😂😂😂😂 you’re a buffoon
Don’t move?
A lot of blind spots in this video I think that officer got hit with cross-fire!!!
EXACTLY
However they would have charged him with that too.
Also will we truly know if he actually fired the gun.
@@butterflynorton9618 can’t trust what the mayor says or the blind spots in the video!!! Just like they silenced the Laquan McDonald shooting.
That Part
@@butterflynorton9618that part we will never know
The criminal shot him in the hand
I see no racism here. I see a fine group of officers who had each others back. I’m glad the officer is alright.
Dexter Reed was a criminal and shot at officers first.
Did you ask yourself why is a tactical squad out in the trenches pulling someone over for not wearing a seatbelt? A tactical squad…
They say cops pulled him over because he wasn't wearing a seat belt. Then they say he refused to roll the tinted windows down. The windows were tinted very dark, so how could they see if he was wearing a seat belt? Is it possible the police fired the first shot? Why does Chicago have a history of white police torture of Black men? Can anyone ever believe Chicago police? Are we in for more riots and Black people demanding justice and freedom from police brutality? NO JUSTICE NO PEACE-NO RACIST POLICE!
@@2inchesfromthegroundbecause he was a criminal with a gun felony.
@@2inchesfromthegroundlmao you’re right the police are just out looking for random blacks to murder
@@2inchesfromthegroundthey were going to arrest him because they knew he was a criminal with a gun. Really pretty simple. He chose a shootout instead.
watch it in slow motion and you see the passenger window blow out before you the officers fire a single shot
I don’t see that at all.
lol I don’t see it either. People make anything up! At first he was about to try to bust the glass with his baton then he put his gun to the window. After that shots was fired but can see from where!!!
Too uninterested to watch again but I'll take your word for it.
This is a very clear video that even the blind can see what happened. To say you and only you see it's the Cops who shot first proves that nothing will allow you to see the truth and that helps convince everyone your ignorant and incapable of rational thought,
Wow brother. That reach was greater than MJ in Space Jam
Damn 96 times is a hell of a lot for one shot. When he dropped behind the car like that when he got out of it, you kind of knew it was a wrap at that point. RIP Dexter Reed. I do wish he had listened to the officers and not shot at them, then he probably could've went home to see his family.
Sadly for his family, the video proves you're correct.
Home a year of so later- had a gun in front seat
No loss
We have seen only the videos that police department wants public to see. If you remember Houston 5 case where Gerald Goins murdered whole Tuttle family and in first is was hero police officers …. and because independent investigation …. Truth get public and Gerald Goines is not a hero but convicted felon…..
He would have went to Jail for a long time if he didn’t shoot at them and ended it this way. People are fed up!!!
Probably should comply with police orders and not shoot at them… Maybe you would get a seatbelt citation.
They're saying the cops were wearing street clothes and didn't identify themselves. He may have thought he was being robbed. Do the police have the footage leading up to this escalation or when they first pulled him over?
Shout out to the Sun-Times for posting this with an honest title instead of trying to mislead the audience like everyone else
Mmmm, the fact they tacked on who shot first at the end of the title makes it feel like they begrudgingly threw it in there against their will. If they wanted to be truly honest they could have worded it much better.
@@Shinji103 fair point. My standards for journalists are so low at this point that I'm impressed by mediocrity
Fatherless behavior.
There is no accounting for stupid - another wasted life in an out-of-control Chicago.
Just another boring day in Chicago. Some aspire to die than to listen in order to live another day. SMH again.
Tactical Units or Teams don’t write moving violations. They don’t write traffic tickets.
Maybe because he was involved in many other crimes and currently out on bail for illegally posseing a gun 😂 the fact that this is your argument instead of placing blame on the loser who chose to shoot at cops 11 times is wild. Such a victim mentality you have and it's very sad
@@410marvel8 Tactical Teams don’t follow people around on bail.
Tactical Teams have missions. They’re not supposed to do traffic control. They’re not meant for neighborhood policing. Don’t be fooled by the narrative. Jump out boys are for Sex Trafficking & Narcotics Trafficking.
@@emeraldarcher4258and you know this….. how?
EVERYONE KNOWS TACTICAL UNITS DO NOT WRITE MOTOR VEHICLE VIOLATIONS. THEY DO NOT WRITE TICKETS. USA 🇺🇸
Well, he fired first so blame is on him and why was he carrying a gun? Probably unregistered to boot. Don’t blame the cops.
He was facing two cases, both gun charges. I guess he didn't want that 3rd case pending
The cost of ammunition wasted, bad; the court costs saved, good. Preventing further crime (including potential harm, or worse, to others) by someone who was clearly headed down that path, priceless. The black lives that matter here are the ones Dexter was endangering by having illegal weapons, stealing, and racing around the neighborhood with a head covering clearly meant to hide his identity. Not to mention the black cops who are trying to preserve the peace. If this guy had not been out on bail, he would have had time to reflect, maybe correct his path. Instead he chose the thug life. It’s hard to have sympathy.
All this over a Seatbelt, And how the Hell did they see a seat belt violation thru the dark tented windows? You got to wonder what was the real reason the man was pulled over.
Perhaps though the windshield?
Prior charges from July 2023 should be referenced.
Naw that officer was hit by friendly fire, no way that you can tell if the bullet came from the car.
Because forensics hasn't been invented yet.
@@tsaints1115 I want to see the test frame by frame 🤨
Your absolutely correct! If they wouldn't have been yelling profanities it would had been a way calmer situation. And he actually let the window down and asked them what's up?
Good acting! It's been at least 3 hours since the tape was released. It's funny, why doesn't this match the story initially told? 🤔
From what I read, the report initially said he was pulled over for not wearing a seatbelt. How would they know that? Tint too dark
The officer who was shot reportedly did not shoot his weapon.
They say cops pulled him over because he wasn't wearing a seat belt. Then they say he refused to roll the tinted windows down. The windows were tinted very dark, so how could they see if he was wearing a seat belt? Is it possible the police fired the first shot? Why does Chicago have a history of white police torture of Black men? Can anyone ever believe Chicago police? Are we in for more riots and Black people demanding justice and freedom from police brutality? NO JUSTICE NO PEACE-NO RACIST POLICE!
@@prettykitty724because the front window was not tinted, and if it was, that would have been another reason to pull him over. Look at you keyboard lawyers trying to find literally anyway to justify that clown getting knocked off.
Takes the phrase mag dump to a whole new level
This gonna hurt his basketball game
He probably was a shooter👀
@@AAAgator dude😂
@@AAAgatorzing 😂
0:18 in, right as the first shot goes off you can see the officer in the hoodie go down as he's hit.
That's a terrible price to pay for illegally parking in front of a fire hydrant!
Wha?
@@danski6694 At the end of the video there is a fire hydrant.
Uhh, I don't think the illegal parking was the cause Mr. Blue State Hero,
@@rorymartin329 Ok great thanks 👍
So they just shot him because he was parked on a hydrant?
@@bowtr0 Do you know the meaning of the word, "sarcasm?" Geeez!
The tourniquet application was beyond ridiculous... "Insert the injured limb through the loop in the band and position the tourniquet 2-3" above the bleeding site. If the most proximal bleeding site is not readily identifiable, place the tourniquet as high as possible on the limb." You do not position the tourniquet at the proximal humerus for a hand/wrist arterial trauma... You are establishing the point of amputation in the field when you apply a tourniquet, by applying it that far up the limb makes it more difficult to assess the effectiveness of the tourniquet application and starves a tremendous amount of viable tissue that should never be at risk. I'm not even sure that the wound warranted a tourniquet, direct pressure may have been more than adequate for the type and volume of hemorrhage.
Yes I noticed that as well, how ridiculous. It also allows all the blood remaining in his arm to seep out faster.
Anyone that was in the boy scouts, let alone the military, knows that a tourniquet should ONLY be used if pressure bandages cannot stop the bleeding. We used to be told to loosen the tourniquet every - I think fifteen minutes - in order to avoid the necessity of amputation of the limb, due to blood poisoning or whatever. I believe we Marines were told (back in the late fifties) to drop the loosening from consideration because allowing more blood loss each time may kill the injured person. A close call, but since most of use don't know how much blood a person requires to survive, the thought is better to risk the limb than the life. Were I in that position, I might be tempted to loosen at least once, if the known loss of blood was not very significant yet. Of course, that's only if it was just me there and no witnesses of my action...
Agreed, I'm a nurse. I thought the same thing. The tourniquet shouldn't be that high for a wrist wound.
And that’s that.
It's not over yet. They say cops pulled him over because he wasn't wearing a seat belt. Then they say he refused to roll the tinted windows down. The windows were tinted very dark, so how could they see if he was wearing a seat belt? Is it possible the police fired the first shot? Why does Chicago have a history of white police torture of Black men? Can anyone ever believe Chicago police? Are we in for more riots and Black people demanding justice and freedom from police brutality? NO JUSTICE NO PEACE-NO RACIST POLICE!
the first 80 shots don't count as he was clearly alive, their job is to eliminate possible risk and clearly he was still alive until the last 10 shots! he would be alive right now but he made the decision
Chicago democrats the Mayor and Kim Foxx will portray him as the victim like always
Johnson already did SMH!
It’s not about democrats or republicans. It’s about what’s right. Ppl kill me always comparing one against the other. Both parties have faults. Period!!!
What about all the daily 100+ shootings per day in Chicago??? (crickets)
They sound and look so dumb these cops this is so unprofessional
Everyone on this thread is so hyper-focused on the perp and the cops, that they completely forgot about the collateral around them. Those cops were shooting from every which direction, a few even had the apartments in their backdrop as they were firing. Unreal ignorance.
I was waiting to see if he was laying on a gun
all the officer cams are on the copa website
the moment he decided to fire at the officers, he sealed his fate, no excuses. of course, there are always people who want to do second guess behind a screen
I mean, what do you want the officers to do, ask him "please don't shoot us. pretty please, I will treat you candy in return"?
Bad boys, bad boys whatcha gonna do?
Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
My question is shouldn't uniformed officers be the ones who pull drivers over for a seatbelt violation? And why did they box him in for a measly seatbelt violation and draw their weapons? And we're talking about Chicago, one of the leading cities when it comes to gun violence, so who's to say whether or not the driver thought these hooded undercover officers were criminals trying to carjack his vehicle? Being they were undercover officers they should have repeatedly stated they were the police to remove all doubt.
Because he had priors... Dude is a violent, stereotypical thug
They say cops pulled him over because he wasn't wearing a seat belt. Then they say he refused to roll the tinted windows down. The windows were tinted very dark, so how could they see if he was wearing a seat belt? Is it possible the police fired the first shot? Why does Chicago have a history of white police torture of Black men? Can anyone ever believe Chicago police? Are we in for more riots and Black people demanding justice and freedom from police brutality? NO JUSTICE NO PEACE-NO RACIST POLICE!
@@Digger-Nick By the same token and warped logic, does this give police, or the FBI for that matter, the right to pull over someone like Hunter Biden, who likewise is a felon with a gun charge, for a minor traffic violation and shove 5 guns in his face while escalating the situation and shoot him 140 times if he ever steps out of line?
Probably checking him out because of the pending gun charge. Looks like they had good reason.
Watch the videos. The cops had tactical vests emblazoned with "POLICE" on the front and back.
Justified.. Thanks Police officers..
Don't forget to fasten your seat belt, it never ends well!
He first shot at the cop through the front windshield
It was through the passenger window, I believe. I saw the smoke from the gun on that side when the suspect was shooting.
you have to comply and then get representation
Dude was a felon and wasn’t supposed to have a gun anyway. His mom made him sound like he was Mr. Rogers and going out for a nice little ride in his spiffy new car😢
You’re very disrespectful. Did you see the gun? And did you see him shooting
"SHOTS FIRED!" Yeah, no shit.
I'm not with the mom on this. Raise better children with fathers and this wouldn't be happening.
...And when the fathers walk out what should women do?
This good part of it is, we don’t have to waste taxpayers money to put him in prison
Dude got shot in the wrist and the other cop puts him in a wrist lock!!!
I still don’t know, something not right.
He wouldn't get out of the car,attempted to drive away,shot the police,tried to run away on foot....? whats missing?
It never is when it involves CPD 🤨
Just blacks doing black things, what about this surprises you?
That’s the ugliest red dot I’ve seen anyone ever use
He was told 5 times to open the door. He willfully disobeyed.
Holy crap this is overkill. Probably that officer was on the crossfire.
Definitely overkill
he asked for that. not sure what is the problem here
Mr. Colander got busted 😂😂😂😂😂
Cops: fires 96 shots into suspect
Cops: stay on the ground don’t move
🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️
I think he ain’t ever moving again 🤔
If the police shot first, why did they run away after the first shot? They were surprised by the gunfire.
They didn't shoot first . Only people saying that are goofy liberals who don't understand how accountability works
It's almost as if more distance = less accurate, not that you would understand that with a small brain. Also the suspect shot first 🤪
JUSTIFIED
To everyone who is saying why officers fired 96 shots at the suspect, it's obvious that the perp was shooting at the officers first (we can see at 0:17 into this video) and they were stuck in a crossfire with the suspect. But once they shot at the suspect more than a dozen times, why did they keep shooting, just pause the video at 0:41, the suspect still had the strength to drive the car after his vehicle was riddled with bullets. I am sure not all the bullets hit him but he was probably shot at least five times at that point. He was still alive and dangerous and officers feared that he can still flee the scene and try shooting at the officers again. That's what drugs do, they give people superhuman, supernatural strenght and terrible behavior. Cops need to make sure the suspect is not moving anymore and is in handcuffs before they can secure the scene. Even people who are already handcuffed are still capable of doing terrible things, that's why cops were yelling at the perp to put his hands behind his back and not to move after they shot him and after he was cuffed. His behavior was proportional to the use of force these officers used. One of the officers was even shot in the arm due to the suspect's reckless behavior.
He got the shoes shot off of him lol
Why they yelling dont move… he ain’t…
Because they already know he has a gun in the car and felony warrants, so they know he is a danger.
His hands were underneath his body and the officers had no way of telling if he was still holding a gun and possibly would fire at the officers again.
The usual dangerous ignorant suspect??? *asking for a friend*
The usual dangerous ignorant suspect is a white supremacist, right? They say cops pulled him over because he wasn't wearing a seat belt. Then they say he refused to roll the tinted windows down. The windows were tinted very dark, so how could they see if he was wearing a seat belt? Is it possible the police fired the first shot? Why does Chicago have a history of white police torture of Black men? Can anyone ever believe Chicago police? Are we in for more riots and Black people demanding justice and freedom from police brutality? NO JUSTICE NO PEACE-NO RACIST POLICE!
These cops are out of their minds.
And Dexter wasn't?
There's always a couple idiots amongst the bunch and guess what?..You're one of them
Toodles! 💙
#COMPLYandyoudontDIE #simple
96 shots is nothing! Did u watch how fast it all happened?? You don’t know if the guy can shoot back when he still is moving and shot at you first and might easily still kill someone.
Damn, scared cops carrying extended mags, but us peasants can't have them.
The threat had to be suppressed and then neutralized and that threat was only finally neutralized as the last few shots were fired, presuming the vehicle absorbed the vast majority of the bullets. Can anybody tell me if the criminal's 11 rounds that he fired at the cops are counted in the '96' claimed in the media to be fired by the cops or are there 107 rounds in total? It's a little hard to count.
I need to see the body cam from the officer who was shot. He was one of two closest to the suspect and should provide much more clear footage of how he was shot by the suspect.
It’s rather interesting that they would use the perspective of an officer that was so far away.
The officer shot was holding his weapon in his right hand and shot in his left. I’m wondering if he shot himself running off.
Bro committed suicide .
What had he done to think his life was over ?
Going to jail for a while is not the worst thing that can happen to you.
There is always tomorrow.
Wheres the video of the officer on the passenger side of Dexter Reeds vehicle?
You can clearly see the black cop getting hit first.. my only objections is that i never heard anyone identifying themselves as police unmarked police car no uniformed officers.. the first one to get hit is a "brotha"..so the argument will be made that maybe he thought he was being robbed 😂
They say cops pulled him over because he wasn't wearing a seat belt. Then they say he refused to roll the tinted windows down. The windows were tinted very dark, so how could they see if he was wearing a seat belt? Is it possible the police fired the first shot? Why does Chicago have a history of white police torture of Black men? Can anyone ever believe Chicago police? Are we in for more riots and Black people demanding justice and freedom from police brutality? NO JUSTICE NO PEACE-NO RACIST POLICE!
Lights were flashing and they clearly had tactical vests that possibly say "POLICE" across the front and back.
Why are we not asking the mother why she didn’t teach her son to obey the law and show respect for authority? The cops did their jobs. She’s the one that failed.
He was studying to become a doktor.
Brave officers in Chicago.
At 0:17 the black cop with the hoodie puts the barrel of his gun (right-hand) on the passenger-side windshield. 1 sec later shots are fired. Hoodie cop gets hit just above his left wrist which appears to be below the passenger-side window. So who shot first? This is like a plane crash investigation. No assumptions just physical and video evidence.
Uhh, let me get this right. We know the perp had a gun AND FIRED IT and wounded an officer.
WTH ???
What do you expect the cops to do? If they did NOT use every available source they could to stop that shooter and someone else got shot - maybe killed - would you please explain why to the victim's wife, mother, father, son, daughter, etc.?
THIS IS A VERY GOOD LEARNING THING FOR ALL OF US:
ALWAYS DO WHAT THE COP TELLS YOU TO DO.
You can hire a lawyer later.
Shooting him at the end while he was face down is crazy
No not at all,he still had the gun.
It’s a f**king joke!!!
not taking a chance
@@django60617when they moved him he did not have a gun!!!
However there was one on the front seat of the car. 96 times is not necessary. I understand protecting themselves but that was not necessary
What caused the felony stopped I wonder?
The number of shots is irrelevant when there are multiple guns being fired , if they kept him in prison for illegally carrying a firearm in a city that banned guns then he’d still be alive , oh well, I hope the black community is watching what these democrat policies continue to do to their neighborhoods
4 shots away from the Wilt Chamberlain
He would still be alive if he had complied with police orders when they arrested his actions. Looked like he fired the first shot. CPD 1- Bad Guys 0
Every notice there are no songs saying “f**K the fire department” or “F**k the ambulance drivers”.. Videos like this…
Why did any of those cops pull out their guns and point it at the guy over an alleged Seat Belt Violation?
Had prior records of being caught with a weapon illegally. All it takes is a quick search of the license plates in the system to pull prior offenses up. Plus the area in which Reed was pulled over is known for traffic stops in which the civilian fire weapons back at police. With all this being said, why wouldn’t you draw your gun out when doing a traffic stop in such a shit neighborhood? It may not be common wherever you live but it is in Chicago.
Total chaos...
The female officer just keeps firing and firing changes out her mag keeps firing keeps.. she 100% panicked
what is police protocol on pulling out and pointing a gun? bc that was a very fast escalation
Protocol is when someone refuses to comply, which is usually the signal they are about to do something really stupid. Would you want to be a cop in this fucked up world? I sure as hell wouldn't want to be one. In fact they couldn't pay me enough!!!
They couldn’t see his hands. They were giving him verbal direction. He chose another route.
Ran his plates noticed he had just recently been charged with felony unlawful use of a firearm and was on pre trial release.wake up
@@Locateclosewithdestroy i am awake and asked a question. relax bud lol
@@Locateclosewithdestroy: it looked very clear that plan was to kill him in the car. Magdump x5. I wonder how many people was wounded on the background? This will be an another European police training video how to not do police work. Us police is only 400 times more deadly than their Scandinavian counterparts.
The POLICEMAN WAS BLACK who got hit DOESNT THAT COUNT
Why did you pull the gun and shoot crazy?People man need to learn how to raise your kids better
Four police - presumably highly trained - needed nearly 100 shots to take down a threat and you think you can protect yourself with a handgun? Not likely.
It's hard to protect yourself against a mob hit. They say cops pulled him over because he wasn't wearing a seat belt. Then they say he refused to roll the tinted windows down. The windows were tinted very dark, so how could they see if he was wearing a seat belt? Is it possible the police fired the first shot? Why does Chicago have a history of white police torture of Black men? Can anyone ever believe Chicago police? Are we in for more riots and Black people demanding justice and freedom from police brutality? NO JUSTICE NO PEACE-NO RACIST POLICE!
None of the headlines said that a cop was shot