Thank you for doing this for students, you are so patient and organised with it all. I am totally stuck with the results section, I feel like I don't understand enough about all the graphs and tables to be able to discuss it on a scientific level. Oh well, I will just battle through it. Thank you again, this was really helpful.
Thank you for your very precise guidance for writing the results of a study (both parts). I am doing a qualitative study and your work is still very helpful to me.
Well, I don't know the specifics of your study, but generally I would say to just explain the result for each thing you looked at in your data one by one, focusing on making the differences and the numbers clear to the readers. If you don't have a significant difference, e.g. p > .05, then just say that. Whatever result you got is important, and important for the readers to know, regardless of whether it's significant or not. The hard part is in the discussion section, where you have to try to figure out what it really means-that is, how to interpret whether there really is an effect or not, given the numbers you got for results (t, p, effect size, etc.). Also there is a lot of talk these days about studies that have negative results (not significant results) and why those don't seem to get published. It seems to me that a negative result could be just as important as a positive.
I have conducted two experiments and the There is a significant difference in season one and no significant difference in season two for the same y- variate using genstat.how do I explain all that.
Is there any reason why the table or figure comes in the middle of a paragraph interrupting the writing and one has to scroll past the table/figure to keep reading and then go back and look at the figure?
Yeah, that's annoying. I can't say much about published papers because that's the publisher's problem, but in Word documents sometimes it's hard to figure out where to put the figures and tables so that they will fit on a page without having too much empty white space. Generally I try to put it after the paragraph where it's mentioned, but sometimes that doesn't work out well visually.
The best explanation that I have ever seen. God bless you.
Thank you for doing this for students, you are so patient and organised with it all. I am totally stuck with the results section, I feel like I don't understand enough about all the graphs and tables to be able to discuss it on a scientific level. Oh well, I will just battle through it. Thank you again, this was really helpful.
I keep coming back to your videos. Thanks for the help! I'm trying to write my thesis, and it's tough
Thank you for your very precise guidance for writing the results of a study (both parts). I am doing a qualitative study and your work is still very helpful to me.
very good explanation. Please keep posting more materials.
Really helped me structure the results section for my dissertation thanks
well explained indeed! but I don't know how to start of my results because I got smaller t value
Well, I don't know the specifics of your study, but generally I would say to just explain the result for each thing you looked at in your data one by one, focusing on making the differences and the numbers clear to the readers. If you don't have a significant difference, e.g. p > .05, then just say that. Whatever result you got is important, and important for the readers to know, regardless of whether it's significant or not. The hard part is in the discussion section, where you have to try to figure out what it really means-that is, how to interpret whether there really is an effect or not, given the numbers you got for results (t, p, effect size, etc.).
Also there is a lot of talk these days about studies that have negative results (not significant results) and why those don't seem to get published. It seems to me that a negative result could be just as important as a positive.
I was looking for 4 hours until I found this
Can anyone send here the link for the mean stem length of seedling clover watered ... ? Thanks
Thank you man. Appreciate you for this!
thank you so so so much!!! IF YOU TEACH AN ONLINE CLASS I WILL BE THERE!!
I have conducted two experiments and the There is a significant difference in season one and no significant difference in season two for the same y- variate using genstat.how do I explain all that.
Very well organised. Thank You.
well explained , Thanks.
This is a GREAT video. Thank you so much!
Is there any reason why the table or figure comes in the middle of a paragraph interrupting the writing and one has to scroll past the table/figure to keep reading and then go back and look at the figure?
Yeah, that's annoying. I can't say much about published papers because that's the publisher's problem, but in Word documents sometimes it's hard to figure out where to put the figures and tables so that they will fit on a page without having too much empty white space. Generally I try to put it after the paragraph where it's mentioned, but sometimes that doesn't work out well visually.
Thelonious Monk gave a great explanation
Precise and explanatory
is this APA style?
+Steve Kirk okay. thank you ☺☺
so nice sir.
THANK YOUU
thank you very helpuf
Super gooooood!!~
Thankyou :)