The fact that the defendant took full responsibility without making excuses and was prepared to pay for the broken window says it all for me. I'm glad that JM took the time to explain why the plaintiff's case was dismissed against the mother. I hope that the plaintiff followed through with suing the minor at 18. Accountability at that age would remind him that actions have consequences no matter how long it takes.
And this is why her badass kids are going to continue to act up because the judge isn't holding them accountable. It's all good because when they become adults and they will get locked up anyway if they don't get unalived before then messing with the wrong person
See I thought you can sue one or all parties that committed the crime? She doesn't have to go after the other kids or identify the other kids because she has one boy that has been confirmed. That boy and his mother can sue his little friends that helped him with the crime if he doesn't feel he should be fully liable, but she found one of the perpetrators and took him to court. I don't understand the Judge on this one.
Because she is asking for one person to pay for everything that she can't even prove was taken such if you told the police you had 1million dollars stolen but you can only prove or someone admits to only taking a portion then they can only go with the minimum
That’s crazy thinking the mom should be charged for everything stolen, she gave back what her son said he took, so why would she have to pay for everything ?
I've seen an episode where JM held the defendant's parent responsible even though, they said there were other kids involved. JM said sue the other kids. So he's not even following his own judgment...
The defendant need to control her kids. That judgement was not fair to the plaintiff. Those kids are already beating that momma down. It will only get worse. 🤷🏽♀️
No it doesnt excuse actions hence why she offered to pay for the window and had him return the items. What would be the point of having him return only some of the items.
I was at 10 years old.....great parents....Im 42 now, alive and doing pretty good. Inventory Manager at my job, live alone and take care of my responsibilities. Ya never know at that age.
@KBabyy93 point not proven....I'm not dead and was not in jail by 16. Nor am I a repeat felon. 10 is too young to predict the outcome....what about 10 year olds who are honor roll students and up career criminals???
Mathis how do u know the defendant did all those things;meds, counseling,disciplined them? She could be lying but,as long as she can sue the child later, go for it.
Exactly, he was biased in this case. Any other case he tells the litigants them that they can sue 1 or all parties involved. I so do not agree with this judgement.
The issue isn't suing them. The issue is she can't prove it was more than that. Can't even prove what is was to the police. You can only sue for what was PROVED such as what they found .
This is not one of those situations where u hold him accountable for alllll that was stolen. It was just that’s the only one she cared to go after since she didnt care to find all the children involved.
The mom is negligent for leaving her son without adult supervision when she knows how his behavior is. Be there or pay a babysitter. A 15 yo girl shouldn’t be made to be responsible for an out of control child. Take him over to his daddy’s house.
Judge Mathis is full of crap. People aren't biased against "The Defendant's" kids. The defendant has some bad azz kids, she doesn't supervise and everybody in the neighborhood has to suffer, because of it. The plaintiff didn't have an attitude. She's just fed up.
So if multiple people break in your home and steal and only one person is caught you’re going to tell the prosecution “let him go because he wasn’t the only one that stole from me.”???
Damn idk how to feel about this because I think the adult and the kids play a big part on this but girl b calm and atleast let her pay for ur window 😩😩
It’s obvious that the plaintiff kids are associated with the neighborhood kids and letting some of them into the house because how would all the robbers know what’s in the house and where there are located in order to commit the breaking in. This was an inside job done by multiple people who knew what they wanted and its location . The plaintiff better stop allowing so called friends in her home or else it will get worse. Also she needs to teach her kids to choose their friends wisely 🤷🏽♀️
I can understand JM's ruling on the Plaintiff having to sue the child and unfortunately having to wait for delinquent to grow up before she can get paid. It's definitely not what your 1st thought would be in this situation, but I've seen cases like this before. And I can easily understand the the Plaintiff's frustration over these neighbor's kids from HELL not being under proper supervision while the incompetent, mom probably sits on her a$$ all day at work. Yeah, I'm sure there was more police involvement and law suits that followed this until those delinquent kids ended up living in a facility with razor-wire on the fences and locked gates and doors to keep the public safe from them, while mom was probably having even more kids for that child support money from multiple baby daddies.
The kid isn’t even in puberty but is already committing crimes? And getting suspended? And this neglectful mom gets a pass? The judge is protecting from when he was also a burglar
JM is irritating! The defendant is not the perfect parent at all. Her kids are bad and her son broke into her home. Smh 🤦🏼♀️ this is crazy. He’s being too lenient on the defendant.
Judge definitely was biased here. It does seem as though the plaintiff has some personal judgement against the defendant but Judge does seem to have a soft spot for single moms working hard to support her children BUT we have seen several times where someone can sue people altogether or separately.
The judge was the biased one in this case because it was a single mom with a child who has adhd and getting into trouble. And he says that was him too as a kid It also annoyed me him asking her why she’s only suing her and not going after the others when that doesn’t matter. They’re jointly and severally liable. She knows her kid did it she doesn’t have to hunt the rest down she can sue one if she wants. She should’ve taken this to People’s court
As a school counselor I just have to chime in on a child being suspended because he can’t sit still and is disruptive due to his diagnosis…..doesn’t happen. There has to be more to that story. If it is true, the school is failing that child.
Now in this instance judge ruled purely off emotion. He wasn't gonna let the plaintiff win one way or the other. The defendant said herself on a couple of occasions he was unsupervised. They better start taking accountability because the next house he break in they might not be so easy on him.
Take the emotion out. Mom took accountability, the plaintiff tried to paint a picture of her kids terrorizing the neighborhood, yet her sister didn’t include. The plaintiff just didn’t like the defendant or her kids period . Glad the judge saw that.
All I'm going to say is she picked the right neighbor.. Cause babyyyy.. Things would have played out different. We STILL would have came to JM, but that window wouldn't have been the only thing busted.
. &&&& Despite the fact the child returned all the items he stole he was still wrong PERIODDDDD!!!!! By the way I believe everything that plaintiff said about the defendant and her disobedient destructive as children 😢💯
The judge is such a narcissist. He just projected his mom onto the defendant and took pity instead of actually enforcing the law. The kid could’ve been sued for all damages as the judge had done on the past and the mom is responsible. SMH.
It should be a crime for people to use (or rather overuse or misuse) the word narcissist without full understanding of the word or the actual mental health condition.
8:32 im not even all the way done with the case and judge mathis don pissed me off!!! The lady admitting that her kids are bad as hell and he goes off on the victim for what?! If she knows that her son is like he is, why would she leave him with another child! Judge Mathis is a damn idiot for this one. And the plaintiff read her for filth at the end lol! Stop blaming being a single mother on everything that goes wrong in your life sheesh
Sorry I believe everything the plaintiff said about her kids . I live in the hood and have always lived in the hood even in the burbs there are plenty of parents who let their kids run amuck . Jm only had a soft spot cause defendant is a single mother with multiple kids like how his mom was .
she sound messy girl relax i wouldn't want to live by her the child was wrong the mother took responsibility but 2 xbox's,a ps and 10 nerf guns so you counted every nerf gun you had in your hse bye messy
Neighbor disputes can be the worst types of situations because it involves where you lay your head. But I thought Mathis was overly harsh on the plaintiff for absolutely no reason at all. She wasn't contemptuous in my opinion.
How was he biased?? She can’t put all the blame on that lady judge , the mom said she gave her the stuff her child took …. Its up for the lady to go after the other kids parents
Long time ago my cousin was always talking down about the neighborhood kds…talking about their mom on how they act…whole time her kds were downtown Chi snatching purses harassing ppl…folks should make sure their foundation is solid before judging someone else’s…
It's funny yall allow people like JM judge talk down on yall when he doing shit behind close doors .. his kids was wilding just cause he got money an can cover it up mfs think they can talk down I be seeing it 😂
The mom is negligent for leaving her son without adult supervision when she knows how his behavior is. Be there or pay a babysitter. A 15 yo girl shouldn’t be made to be responsible for an out of control child. Take him over to his daddy’s house.
The fact that the defendant took full responsibility without making excuses and was prepared to pay for the broken window says it all for me. I'm glad that JM took the time to explain why the plaintiff's case was dismissed against the mother. I hope that the plaintiff followed through with suing the minor at 18. Accountability at that age would remind him that actions have consequences no matter how long it takes.
Exactly, these comments are full of biggots you can tell because if there's 4 of them then ALL 4 should be held accountable not just her son.
She can't supervise the kids that she has but she just keeps on having them. 🚮🚮🗑🚮
That’s a good one 🤣🤣🤣
Its a trip right? Talk about equal rights
Go bbysit them since it’s a problem for you…you don’t provide for those kds…she can have 5 more if she wants it’s not taking coins from you…
Go bbysit them since you’re so concerned…she can have 5 more kds if she wants it’s not taking coins from you…
I wonder if Mathis ever watches any of these later in life and be like “what the hell was I thinking?”
😂😂😂frfr
@@MikeOh99 Good question.....
Exactly
Do you say the same to Judge Judy, because she is mean and out of touch, especially on her new show.
@@Profess84never heard of here. Only watch Mathis and Brown
Damn they cleaned the plaintiff out…
I could of sworn as long as you got one you can sue for everything as a whole. And if they wanna recover from the others they should sue 🤔
I could of sworn the same from his other judgements
And this is why her badass kids are going to continue to act up because the judge isn't holding them accountable. It's all good because when they become adults and they will get locked up anyway if they don't get unalived before then messing with the wrong person
Bias against her and her children 😂 he literally broke in her home and stole and it was confirmed! They have no control…wonder where they are now….
She lost cause her "head moving"😂😂😂
SMH 😂
Yeah her attitude and talking down on the mom and kids
L🤣L exactly
Judge was wrong. He’s so biased. He thinks that mother is doing her best? OMG
@@gstickler1 Exactly.
How you assume that you don't know that lady
Judge was so wrong
How the judge bias when she can’t prove which one of the four stole what. Y’all slow af
@sayybree2446 Nobody is slow 🐌 but you. She can sue any one of them like the judge always states but that day he changes his mind.
This is BS. I'd be pissed if someone came into my home & stole. Judge was definitely biased on this one. Her "attitude" was warranted.
Right!!!
lol I can tell it’s easy to get by u lol just have to tell u a sad story lmfaoooooo
I agree..like it touched a nerve
Oh please. You cant put everything off on 1 child, thats ridiculous.. plus the mom should not pay for his wrong doing HE SHOULD when he’s of age.
But the defendant is NOT the person who is responsible. She should sue the child, not the mother.
She read her DOWN at the end. I agree. Control your kids cuz some ppl will put hands and feet on they’re lil thievin behinds
Judge was wrong but she should pursue criminal charges
😮I'm sorry, but can u picture that... "Bam lights come on 😂
See I thought you can sue one or all parties that committed the crime? She doesn't have to go after the other kids or identify the other kids because she has one boy that has been confirmed. That boy and his mother can sue his little friends that helped him with the crime if he doesn't feel he should be fully liable, but she found one of the perpetrators and took him to court. I don't understand the Judge on this one.
Correct ! He even said this before on another episode However judges uses the law in which matter the see fit. Jude wasn’t right on this one!
Exactly
Because she is asking for one person to pay for everything that she can't even prove was taken such if you told the police you had 1million dollars stolen but you can only prove or someone admits to only taking a portion then they can only go with the minimum
That’s crazy thinking the mom should be charged for everything stolen, she gave back what her son said he took, so why would she have to pay for everything ?
I've seen an episode where JM held the defendant's parent responsible even though, they said there were other kids involved. JM said sue the other kids. So he's not even following his own judgment...
All those video games and in the hood?!?! Two systems maybe but she had like 6 🤣
With 200 games at that, i called bullshit, she was putting 10 on 2
The defendant need to control her kids. That judgement was not fair to the plaintiff. Those kids are already beating that momma down. It will only get worse. 🤷🏽♀️
Did you listen to the case? Her son is the one she’s having issues with, she’s trying her best
@ So, the mom having problems with the kid excuses his actions for destroying other’s property???
No it doesnt excuse actions hence why she offered to pay for the window and had him return the items. What would be the point of having him return only some of the items.
10 already breaking in homes? He’ll be dead or in prison before he hits 16 smh
Facts
I was at 10 years old.....great parents....Im 42 now, alive and doing pretty good. Inventory Manager at my job, live alone and take care of my responsibilities. Ya never know at that age.
And I've been to jail once for 10 months for selling drugs.
@@MrLenroc82 exactly my point sir lol
@KBabyy93 point not proven....I'm not dead and was not in jail by 16. Nor am I a repeat felon. 10 is too young to predict the outcome....what about 10 year olds who are honor roll students and up career criminals???
Mathis how do u know the defendant did all those things;meds, counseling,disciplined them? She could be lying but,as long as she can sue the child later, go for it.
Exactly my thoughts. She did not show any documentation proving this.
Get your kids don't touch nothing that don't belong to you
I have lived by kids with parents that did all of that..the parents acted like the kids and the kids were the parents..had to move away asap
Why wouldn’t she have an attitude if they broke in her home
Now he knows that you can sue anyone who committed a crime against you, single or several
Exactly, he was biased in this case. Any other case he tells the litigants them that they can sue 1 or all parties involved. I so do not agree with this judgement.
Exactly! He has said it SEVERAL times before!
The issue isn't suing them. The issue is she can't prove it was more than that. Can't even prove what is was to the police. You can only sue for what was PROVED such as what they found .
Exactly
This is not one of those situations where u hold him accountable for alllll that was stolen. It was just that’s the only one she cared to go after since she didnt care to find all the children involved.
The defendant must have reminded the judge of his mother. That’s why he believed her lies. She lets her kids run rampant.
The mom is negligent for leaving her son without adult supervision when she knows how his behavior is. Be there or pay a babysitter. A 15 yo girl shouldn’t be made to be responsible for an out of control child. Take him over to his daddy’s house.
How you supervise your kids if you work 12 hours a day.
You can’t it’s not possible.
Judge Mathis is full of crap. People aren't biased against "The Defendant's" kids. The defendant has some bad azz kids, she doesn't supervise and everybody in the neighborhood has to suffer, because of it. The plaintiff didn't have an attitude. She's just fed up.
Y’all people crazy thinking she should pay for everything. Her son ain’t take everything.
So if multiple people break in your home and steal and only one person is caught you’re going to tell the prosecution “let him go because he wasn’t the only one that stole from me.”???
The law says you can sue one if there are multiple people involved. Then that person can sue the others if they so choose.
Damn idk how to feel about this because I think the adult and the kids play a big part on this but girl b calm and atleast let her pay for ur window 😩😩
Judge Mathis did good. I don’t like her attitude either ✊🏾✊🏾✊🏾✊🏿✊🏿✊🏿
8:05.........The plaintiff got a serious attitude. Her stance and neck roll were very contemptuous in JM court. 🤔 ⚖️
I wouldn’t be in court with an attitude but she has a right to be angry
It’s obvious that the plaintiff kids are associated with the neighborhood kids and letting some of them into the house because how would all the robbers know what’s in the house and where there are located in order to commit the breaking in. This was an inside job done by multiple people who knew what they wanted and its location . The plaintiff better stop allowing so called friends in her home or else it will get worse. Also she needs to teach her kids to choose their friends wisely 🤷🏽♀️
I can understand JM's ruling on the Plaintiff having to sue the child and unfortunately having to wait for delinquent to grow up before she can get paid. It's definitely not what your 1st thought would be in this situation, but I've seen cases like this before.
And I can easily understand the the Plaintiff's frustration over these neighbor's kids from HELL not being under proper supervision while the incompetent, mom probably sits on her a$$ all day at work.
Yeah, I'm sure there was more police involvement and law suits that followed this until those delinquent kids ended up living in a facility with razor-wire on the fences and locked gates and doors to keep the public safe from them, while mom was probably having even more kids for that child support money from multiple baby daddies.
Plaintiff is doing a horrible job for WHATEVER reason.
Do you mean the defendant
JM had a soft spot for the defendant and got irritated with the plaintiff. He dropped the ball on this one..
MATHIS: Don't come in my courtroom being ignant! 8:03
Her neck lost that case 😂
The kid isn’t even in puberty but is already committing crimes? And getting suspended? And this neglectful mom gets a pass? The judge is protecting from when he was also a burglar
I don’t think Yall understand that the child needs to pay NOT the mom .. she did her part.
JM is irritating! The defendant is not the perfect parent at all. Her kids are bad and her son broke into her home. Smh 🤦🏼♀️ this is crazy. He’s being too lenient on the defendant.
Judge definitely was biased here. It does seem as though the plaintiff has some personal judgement against the defendant but Judge does seem to have a soft spot for single moms working hard to support her children BUT we have seen several times where someone can sue people altogether or separately.
The judge was the biased one in this case because it was a single mom with a child who has adhd and getting into trouble. And he says that was him too as a kid
It also annoyed me him asking her why she’s only suing her and not going after the others when that doesn’t matter. They’re jointly and severally liable. She knows her kid did it she doesn’t have to hunt the rest down she can sue one if she wants. She should’ve taken this to People’s court
JM I’m with you when you right but this was not right she can sue one or all😮
As a school counselor I just have to chime in on a child being suspended because he can’t sit still and is disruptive due to his diagnosis…..doesn’t happen. There has to be more to that story. If it is true, the school is failing that child.
You dropped the ball on this judge 🤦🏾♂️
Smh....10 years old and allegedly broke a window. 🤦🏾♀️ I bet she's one of those "gentle parent" types. 😂
As a gamer I was impressed with all the game systems she had in that house. And over 200 games too?
The plaintiff is just talking all bad about the defendant! She all worried about her business!
JM has a soft spot for the defendant cus he was a bad kid who put his mom through it.
Once again judge Mathis got It WRONG because of his feelings...thanks
Where are they now?
Now in this instance judge ruled purely off emotion. He wasn't gonna let the plaintiff win one way or the other. The defendant said herself on a couple of occasions he was unsupervised. They better start taking accountability because the next house he break in they might not be so easy on him.
Take the emotion out. Mom took accountability, the plaintiff tried to paint a picture of her kids terrorizing the neighborhood, yet her sister didn’t include. The plaintiff just didn’t like the defendant or her kids period . Glad the judge saw that.
JM is the most inconsistent judge on TV.
Judge Mathis was wrong as hell.
Joint and severally liable… I hate when he plays favorites.
S n d on the porch 😂😂😂😂
Damn i thought i had alot of video games, but damn them kids are living large 😂
All I'm going to say is she picked the right neighbor.. Cause babyyyy.. Things would have played out different. We STILL would have came to JM, but that window wouldn't have been the only thing busted.
. &&&& Despite the fact the child returned all the items he stole he was still wrong PERIODDDDD!!!!! By the way I believe everything that plaintiff said about the defendant and her disobedient destructive as children 😢💯
She was literally just shaking her head no and judge mathis jumped her. Smh this was a BS verdict.
Girl stop it you didn't have all them items
The judge is such a narcissist. He just projected his mom onto the defendant and took pity instead of actually enforcing the law. The kid could’ve been sued for all damages as the judge had done on the past and the mom is responsible. SMH.
It should be a crime for people to use (or rather overuse or misuse) the word narcissist without full understanding of the word or the actual mental health condition.
Second case and JM is being biased again ..smh
Judge Mathis is gonna get his wife back speaking it into existence!!!! He and wife will align frequencies
They are already back!
@ good news travels slow glad to hear
Ain’t no way
Damn robbin' @ 10?!!!
1:03 - 2:16 Da Hell??
Why the hell would you have 4 more children, if you can’t parent your first child properly 🤦🏾♀️🤦🏾♀️🤦🏾♀️🤦🏾♀️….thats freaking insane.
200 games get outta here lady
This was a terrible case by Judge Mathis.
Where are these kids father at?
It seems as if both plaintiff and defendant are single parents. Is your question about both of them?
Come on now JM
8:32 im not even all the way done with the case and judge mathis don pissed me off!!! The lady admitting that her kids are bad as hell and he goes off on the victim for what?!
If she knows that her son is like he is, why would she leave him with another child!
Judge Mathis is a damn idiot for this one.
And the plaintiff read her for filth at the end lol! Stop blaming being a single mother on everything that goes wrong in your life sheesh
No one mentioned dad...or my kids daddy... SMH
JM was wrong 😢
Mom is trying tho as a single parent trying to work and supervise counseling etc
Sorry I believe everything the plaintiff said about her kids . I live in the hood and have always lived in the hood even in the burbs there are plenty of parents who let their kids run amuck . Jm only had a soft spot cause defendant is a single mother with multiple kids like how his mom was .
Bs ruling. JM is too biased!
she sound messy girl relax i wouldn't want to live by her the child was wrong the mother took responsibility but 2 xbox's,a ps and 10 nerf guns so you counted every nerf gun you had in your hse bye messy
Judge Mathis I disagree this time you my boy
She's got nerve talking about "act their age!" - Great call judge. Mama held up well.
Defendant doesn't deserve kids!
She's negligent!!!!
8:04 nasty attitude and i definitely believe she’s lying. I would have dismissed her case immediately!
Judge gave all those examples of what a good parent would do when their child is misbehaving but yet the defendent did none of those things
And he didn’t ask about a father, or where they’re from.
Neighbor disputes can be the worst types of situations because it involves where you lay your head. But I thought Mathis was overly harsh on the plaintiff for absolutely no reason at all. She wasn't contemptuous in my opinion.
She singled out she black kids of course and I'm SURE her children are biracial
Chill out , Malcolm Flex. Her kids sound like trash!
He shoulda had her pay for the window and that’s all
How was he biased?? She can’t put all the blame on that lady judge , the mom said she gave her the stuff her child took …. Its up for the lady to go after the other kids parents
He's biased bc folks "feel" like it 😂
Long time ago my cousin was always talking down about the neighborhood kds…talking about their mom on how they act…whole time her kds were downtown Chi snatching purses harassing ppl…folks should make sure their foundation is solid before judging someone else’s…
She would’ve won if she wasn’t a Karen! 😂
It's funny yall allow people like JM judge talk down on yall when he doing shit behind close doors .. his kids was wilding just cause he got money an can cover it up mfs think they can talk down I be seeing it 😂
No I think he sympathized with the defendant because he was the same way as her son when he was a child. His mother couldn’t do anything with him.
If you really believe that you’re an idi**
First🎉 yayyyy❤
Here’s some cookies🍪🍪🍪🤡
@@italkalotofshit you're mad 😂😂
Here is you virtual cookie 🍪
@@TeranceWattsCLT you eat the cookie
@ nah you got it bulldagger 😂
A single mother with 5 kids (btw no mention of a father in the kids Lives) I can see how she's trying her best🤷🏽♂️
The ending seemed to indicate that both plaintiff and defendant are single parents with multiple children and no mention or appearance of a father.
Jesus , I hope the young man lives long. 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽 Save him LORD!!
I'm assuming this is a few years old
I bet that 14 year old is an inmate or in a casket now
No the defendant is not a good mother 😮
Smdh. I understand why he dismissed the case BUT she couldn’t control her kids and it’s sad. I wonder where they are now.
Single mother of 5
Horrible
Second
The mom is negligent for leaving her son without adult supervision when she knows how his behavior is. Be there or pay a babysitter. A 15 yo girl shouldn’t be made to be responsible for an out of control child. Take him over to his daddy’s house.