2016 Atlantic Hurricane Season Animation V.2
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 гру 2023
- Support us by using all of our outlets below! ↓
Become a Channel Member ► ua-cam.com/users/forcethirteen...
Become a Patron ► / forcethirteen
View our Merchandise Store ► teespring.com/stores/force-th...
Join our Discord Server ► / discord
Follow us on Facebook ► / forcethirteen
Follow us on Twitter ► / forcethirteen
Subscribe to Force Thirteen ► ua-cam.com/users/Forcethirte...
I love how Colin is still a low-pressure system 😂
😂😂😂😂
Great animation, however the updates make it hard to differentiate it with the actual animation
yeah
Tbh we need the old landfall lines back, in my opinion the circles feel a bit odd. Other than that, this was a good animation!
Same, I was confused they changed the landfall effect,
yeah its weird i agree we need the old landfalls back!!!!
I remember when people freaked out when they saw Matthew's skull. Even today its so unsettling.
What makes it more horrific is the skull was visible on sattelite right before it struck Haiti.
At least he had Beautiful teeths
Veeeery spoooooky skull indeed
Was Matthew not a cat 5?
Force thirteen uses their own analysis
1:35
*a hurricane exists*
"Nope, not an April Fools' Joke"
"But it's January-"
"Oh, indeed a January Fools' Joke"
"..."
I've noticed there are some comments relating to Matthew not being a C5 in this animation. I'll try to explain that:
In Matthew's TCR, the NHC regarded it as a C5 due to the SFMRs at 145kts or 165mph. At the time the report was written, the NHC said that the measurements are reliable, despite the lower FL winds from Matthew, which stands at around 140-145kts, which rounds down to 130-135kts or 150-155mph. However, since then, the NHC implied that Matthew's data was suspicious after storms like Irma, Jose, Michael, and Dorian. Iota's TCR was when the NHC found that Matthew's data is considered unreliable. Iota, which WAS a C5 operationally, was downgraded when its TCR came out. Iota and Matthew's FL winds and SFMRs are coincidentally similar to each other, which hopefully explains why F13 does not have Matthew as a C5 anymore, albeit unofficially.
However, even with Matthew's downgrade (and subsequent retirement), it does not take away how devastating, infamous, and deadly Matthew was throughout its life. On a side note, Matthew was a weak but deadly TS back in 2010 in Central America, but was not retired and thus, was used again for this season.
i think it was 140 kts but either way it was devastating
Plus Matthew was very very ugly in structure for a cat 5
@@slayer48202 TCR upgraded it to 145 knots (165 mph). I think 130 knots (150 mph) will be the actual peak when they get back to it.
@@craigceecee8762 fair enough now that i look back at it
I’ve been waiting on this for years!!!!
I’ve been waiting for this one!
Bruh after years there a v2 at this point we might get a 1979 v2💀
There will be
this remade verison of the 2016 hurricane season animation is just wild
it looks perfect the new landfalls are nice and with no tracklines that is ok i can memorize it the timeline clock looks cool and nice i love the transition slide that are used for the names it is great and nice without the ace bar that is ok you can add it when you make an animation i really wish i can animate well i give this a comfy 10/10
2016 Was a cute year
Agree
UwU
man i miss 2016
@@DAJTheUA-camr_2007 same i miss 2016 the good ole days
Awesome animation force 13!!!!! You guys did amazing making a version 2 on 2016! Keep up the good work!
oh how much i wish it was still 2016 :(
First of all this animation looks bad in comparison to other animations of the same channel or the same animator.
2016 V1 had tracklines, and a ACE Bar, this V2 only have the new icons, the landfall markers and timeline clock that dont fit with the animation, even the font of the names, it looks like a big downgrade in comparison to the V1, and the only thing that fits ok are the music and the icon transitions with hue shift.
If the animation had water, the ACE bar, tracklines, the old markers of this year, the old timeline of this year, the font being in Exo Semibold as always and transitions as slide for names the systems.
2016 NATL gets a solid 3/10.
i would add this animation as the worst of 2023.
ugh, you again?
@@RobloxBansYThe maybe hates f13
@user-zo7rl2qq1x Also, I agree with that first part, I hate when there’s no track lines of the storm. It has me FUMING.
It doesnt help me that the first named storm is Alex and the animator is Alex
Very unexpectedly coincidental indeed! Though, Alex was first used when Andrew got retired after 1992. However, Alex could have been retired in 2010 due to how destructive and deadly it was, but it didn't.
@notmrpopular0099 2004 Alex was the definition of Donut
epic work alex
The 2016 ATL hurricane season, the first of 6 above-average seasons in the basin. It had quite a few records: a January hurricane, the first since 1938; 2 pre-season storms, the first since 2012; OFFICIALLY the first C5 since Felix in 2007; and a C3 November hurricane striking Nicaragua.
The most notable storm though has got to be Matthew. Killing over 500 and making various strong landfalls (not to mention that creepy skull-like appearance right before landfall in Haiti), this storm surely has been devastating. The effects are still being felt today.
There was also Otto, a costly and damaging storm in Nicaragua, which became the first November major hurricane since Paloma in 2008. It also was the first ATL-EPAC crossover since Cesar-Douglas in 1996. This season, like every season was interesting in its own way.
2016 would go on to initiate yet another round of above average activity, until 2022 would break that above-average record... 2016 is also the second consecutive season to feature at least one retired name and had a second round of devastation after 2015, an inactive but destructive season... As of 2023, the endless rounds of devastation in the ATL is finally over, although with the WMO meeting in Q2 2024, there may not be any retirees after the 2023 season...
@@notmrpopular0099 yep, I still think Idalia might be a candidate though, just maybe
This is the Pacific, but the last storm for 2016 there was also Otto
i feel like otto is like beta in 2005 but did not crossover otto did
Good job TSK!
1:36 Lmao this scared me thought yall added a random Hurricane near Bermuda, also damn surprised this wasnt a premiere! Watching how the animations has changed from year to year over time and over the same seasons will be interesting , I think the 2024 Atlantic Hurricane season will be rather long 👀
I remember in V1, they noted the "Subtropical Storm", Stephanie, in the Bay of Biscay. Does F13 no longer believe Stephanie was (sub)tropical?
I don't know, but maybe they did have a look back and changed their minds nowadays. I mean, if a F13 CAT were to see this, can they confirm that they no longer has it as a subtropical storm? Well, probably not, but I'd like to know!
@@notmrpopular0099We believe it not to be subtropical in nature and instead extratropical, although it could have been, but to play it safe we’re not including it
Never was subtropical
Matthew hit the Cuba, Nicole hits Bermuda, and Otto hits Costa Rica, But Matthew and Otto were the only retired storms and replaced by Martin and Owen in 2022
nice work Alex! (also agreed on Colin and Matthew)
Hurricane Otto was devastating for Costa Rica and Nicaragua
Hurricane Matthew, the first time the NWS started using Extreme Wind Warnings.
Nice
I kinda agree on their downgraded system which is Matthew.
If it is about keeping Matthew as a C5 or down to C4, I'll respect that. Though I'd argue the recon data for Matthew which *was* reliable back then is highly suspicious nowadays after Irma, Jose, and Iota's TCRs came out, with the latter having similar FL winds and SFMRs to Matthew...
same
@@notmrpopular0099they are saying that they agree on Matthew being downgraded to Category four and not Category five. Lol in my comment I was joking, if anybody thinks Matthew was a Category four 155 mph peak that's alright
@@peightonspeth6857 Yeah I did notice that later on, and ofc the joke of yours was missed, that was my bad tbh
@@notmrpopular0099it's alright, lol I like to be controversial sometimes
Ian in 2016: weak
Ian in 2022: does 116B dollars in damages
OMG YES FINALLY
Whey was Colin named it was just low pressure systom
finnaly
Matthew was supposed to make landfall in South or North Carolina. What's with the change?
when will the 2023 atlantic hurricane season animation be out?
Between now and Christmas
I would like to see which hurricane names got retired
Mathew is category 5
As far as I know, Hurricane Otto is the only hurricane that has made landfall in Costa Rica
Actually Only a Tropical Storm in 1887 and Bonnie of 22 ever made landfall in Costa Rica. otto was Just very very southern Nicaragua
Ian: I’m next villain 😂😂😂!
Great Animation! However, wasn’t Hurricane Matthew a category 5 hurricane?
They use their own analysis so that's why its different from official reports
@@mspectrite8025 oh, alright
I think F13 regards Matthew as a C4 because of the recon data from Matthew. As a TLDR: Matthew's recon data was found to be reliable at the time the NHC's TCR came out years ago. However, when Irma, Jose, Iota, and other TCRs for other storms have found that the recon data was suspicious for those storms, they also found that Matthew's data is suspicious too. This is especially true with Iota, which had similar FL winds and SFMRs to Matthew which resulted in its downgrade.
waiting for a 1979 atlantichurricane season!
Can you make 2013 Pacific typhoon season V2
It's already here
@@JarredandYellowJ9228no v3
@@averyandrewpadilla1818 it’s a little too soon for it the animation only came out four years ago
@@JarredandYellowJ9228 how about v3 or v4
@@averyandrewpadilla1818 the animation is like 4 years ago so just wait for another 1 or 2 years for it
Force attracted to teens
nathan has W edge to force thirteen year olds to
How ever Matthew hit in near somewhere around
Hey kobe smae thing
Yah vesison 2
Hurricane MATTHEW
Pls do 2023 🙏🏽
I disagree on the Matthew downgrade, I think Matthew peaked at Category five 165 mph 934 mb
I'm sorry, but I fail to see Matthew as a C5 nowadays due to how suspicious the recon data is for that storm. Sure, it was confirmed to be reliable at the time its TCR is published, but Iota's TCR, along with Michael, Irma, Jose, and Dorian really doesn't support Matthew's C5 status, especially with the SFMR data inconsistencies. Although, I'll still let your opinion stand, I don't expect you (or anyone) to agree with me at all.
I have it at 135 knots and 937 hPa
Doesn't have any big supporting evidence for 165 mph at all. The analysis on Iota (regarding SFMR) proves that Matthew is highly overestimated
Yeah, and blending the recon data from the FL winds and the SFMRs together only support 155mph at the absolute highest. Unless if there's missing data like observations (buoys, ground observations, etc.) I am not giving Matthew a C5 at all.
165mph is kind of overly aggresive, most agree with Matthew being 155-160mph
Is this animation better than 1944 WPAC lmao
Probably yeah :D There are some things which could be improved but overall a big upgrade :D
Hopefully you'll get to know how to do some more advanced stuff for future animations! Yeah ik, there are new animators in F13 but Ima give em the benefit of the doubt, don't get pressured to learn about how to do more advanced features other animators have done
@@notmrpopular0099 i was on a time crunch when i did this so i never had time to do ace bar and tracklines. i tried implementing an ace bar but i realized on how the video is formatted and made. it’s not possible
in my opinion, yeah it is
I think Natl will end with Sara in 2024
Did Hurricane Matthew get downgraded by Force Thirteen analysis?!
Yes and should be officially downgraded
@@aron1332 I still prefer it being a cat 5 with 160 or 165 mph winds. But that's fine tho.
@@kutie_hiiiii well you should look at evidence first.
@@aron1332 oh, i knew better now, sorry about the misinformation earlier
I'm sorry, but I find putting happy-go-lucky electronic music to a landfall that devastated a nation and killed hundreds at 5:51 extremely inappropriate
@QST_1736 Are those celebratory musical effects absolutely necessary to cyclone animations?
I think you just answered your question yourself. Happy music has no place as the soundtrack to deadly hurricanes the same way you wouldn't blast eurodance music over Holocaust documentaries.