Hannah Guitierrez Seeks New Trial? Reviewing the Documents
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 сер 2024
- So, doing an experiment of doing this review twice--if you saw the first one, you'll find it a bit repetitive, but you are of course welcome to join. We're going to be reviewing the request for a new trial, with my thoughts.
2.5 years now cancer free after right kidney removed with cancer. Celebrating watching Runkle again after seeing Dr. who read the CAT scan.
Holy shit, congrats friend!!!!
Congratulations! I hope you can celebrate, if you so wish. 🎉🎉
The DA who quit is my hero! I love ethics in the law, and she was briming with ethics in her actions. God Bless her.
100% AGREE !
Emily said stream yard got bought out and got rid of the support team. Doesn’t sound good. She’s really frustrated like everyone is.
Venture capitalists need their money!
That stream was rough.. 1 parts troubleshooting, to 2 parts stream. 😂
Anything that gets us more Runkle gets my vote
Not me - a USAF veteran - yelling "Mattis! Mattis!" at my screen on the replay 🤣
Weren't there accusations of Kenney being a bit too close to the lead investigator? Almost living in her pocket, calling dozens of times to discuss the investigation, being "super helpful" and more? If I was Hannah's lawyer I'd totally go after Hancock. Perhaps she wanted to be "helpful" to him in return?
That got brought up during Baldwin, he called her a lot, she never reached out to him, they asked about her phone records so they had proof if they needed it
Yes he was being extreeeemely helpful.
Yes! Too helpful some may say.. the more that comes out, the more I am suspicious... between the eagerness of Kinney and Halls quick acceptance of a deal....eeh..
You weren't muted at the beginning. The fuse and the boom were perfectly clear the first time
Yeah I'm replay crew and heard everything.
Weird. I couldn't see it.
Same. Replay crew, hearing everything.
It's like KM said if she is going down she is taking the investigators with her.
I do believe morrissey only saw the picture, knew these bullets never left AZ, and thought because of the relationship/friendship with Theil Reed was trying to muddy the water and was not relevant. That said, she should have turned it over anyway. I do appreciate that KM had the hearing public so that the investigators Handcock and Poppel will have to be treated for misconduct.
@@annm9589I am with you 100% - no way she didn’t see the bullets.
She had been shown several times to lie to cover her a$$.
Also pretty sure with her bossy and commandeering behaviour she pushed Hancock and the technician around to do what she wanted
Thanks for the post, Ian please get rest and take care of you and your wife.
May be even worse, morrisey testified that BOWLES sent her the pic of the teske rounds
Sorry I missed you live. I was sick today. Bad migraine 😢 feeling a little better so watching Emily and now you ❤
Bowles and Hancock are equally excellent at their respectve jobs, imo....
😂
I honestly think KM's goal with testifying was to preserve Reed's conviction.
and to get on record she was not aware of the new case # used that Hancock threw her under the bus with.
@jeng8401 lol yeah she seemed to think that if she backed the bus up, she could get out from under it, but she just got ran over a second time
0:00 Intro
1:55 Hannah Gutierrez-Reed: Expedited Motion for a New Trial
49:54 Challenge Coin Chat
53:32 Back to Motion
1:33:59 Superchats
1:44:12 Motions - HGR a danger?
1:52:43 Superchats
1:56:20 Erlinda Johnson Interview
2:49:07 Court TV: Erlinda Johnson Interview
3:10:24 Chats & Puppies
I'm in the see it again crew! Love your takes
FYI - I think you have made an excellent argument for a retrial on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel.
I heard the fuse BOOM
if you stream twice i will probably watch twice, but for sure ill watch one, even if i don’t catch it live.
its easier for me to watch live after work
I spent a good five minutes trying to remember who Alec Baldwin played in The Hunt for Red October. Absolutely floored me that he played Jack. I forgot that it wasn’t Harrison Ford, because it was Harrison Ford for all of the rest of the movies they made.
Replay crew here... Chocolate (film) is excellent!!!
'Carthago delenda est' Had me crying. 🤣 Thanks for the laughs on replay this morning
@RunkleofTheBailey Love your out-of-the-box thinking, empathy & exploration of different possibilities, viewpoints from various perspectives, SCENARIOS & CREATIVE, RELATABLE EXPLAINATIONS. Thank much you, Ian.
Finished the last video on to this one thanks so much for sharing 😊
Former US Army here - In the Army, a challenge coin is something you earn as a part of Unit, it was used as a proof that you belong to a certain unit (ie a challenge) Each unit have them and say if someone doubt (or challenge) you were in the Ranger, then you produce a Ranger Coin to answer that question.
There another aspect of challenge coin, we bet on them, usually something stupid like having a drinking contest. Say if you beat a Green Beret, you got his coin, a la you bet your honor with the unit you were on.
Maybe I'm remembering incorrectly, but I thought Morrissey said explicitly to the judge that she needed to take the stand "to bring this all into the open"?
Yes she did, because her reputation and standing was been attacked and the public needed to hear the truth
@@jfraserfisher I thought I had heard it. Thanks.
If you like The Departed and don't mind subtitles, definitely check out Infernal Affairs, the Hong Kong film it was remade from.
had to watch both, just in case you said something new... 😊
Elinda Johnson is added to the Brady list for Santa Fe New Mexico with Kerri Morressy. Are names added and then an investigation? I was surprised to see that after the interviews
I believe Johnson when she says she knew nothing about it. It was under a different case number and she came in late to the case.
@@annm9589 yeah exactly i don’t understand why she’s on there. Unless it’s automatic while an investigation is ongoing to clear those involved. They can’t just take someone’s word for it maybe. I 100% believe her. She resigned and talked about it right away
Both LEOs and prosecutors appear to have effed up and then tried to cover up. Why? (Bias or incompetence or corruption?) Whatever the cause, their conduct perverted the course of justice. Both the armorer and the actor deserved to stand trial and to be judged by a jury who saw ALL the evidence. That did not happen.
I agree that Mr. Bowles' argument of prosecutorial misconduct is probably not enough to set aside the verdict for Hannah G. Reed. However, it might be enough to get her a new trial. But if the state proceeds with a new trial, who would it appoint as its THIRD lead prosecutor? The last two were biased and they buried evidence.
Although casting shade at Ms. Morrissey is theatrical, Mr. Bowles should also question the actions of law enforcement. They failed to secure the crime scene and prevent evidence tampering / destruction by Seth Kenny and Sarah Zachary. These two were then given plea deals by the prosecution, which suddenly lost interest in identifying who brought live ammo to the set. IMO, the supplier of the ammo seems just as culpable as an armorer who failed to check the gun and an actor who pulled the trigger.
Mr. Bowles seems inept. He should step down so a better lawyer can represent Ms. Reed in her appeals and/or a new trial.
When I was attending UND to be a Legal Assistant, we had Research and Writing every semester, and it was intensive. I once argued with a fellow student when she wanted to cite Opera Winfrey in a document. Come on, what law school did she graduate from? I loved the course, 2 years of intensive legal education that left me with the degree, got a 4.0 but could not find employment. Who wanted to hire a 50 year old disabled cop who needed a cane to walk and had problems accessing lower drawers on file cabinets because of the steel rods in my spine. Finely got a job as an office manager for a chain of pretzel stores.
Well done in the course good luck in future
23:49 - An argument, PERHAPS. Remember that Bowles had the door slammed on their original choice for a "firearms expert" by the Judge because it "would take too long". That's how they ended up with the re-enacting/accountant firearms enthusiast.
My wife: "...Does Runkle know that he looks like a Targaryen?"
Me: "... ... ..."
I think someone needs to search Alberta for Dragon Eggs...
Pardon me if I missed this if it was said recently, but us there a date for the 24hr stream yet?
2:50:11 she so looks like she is wearing a Minnie Mouse bow in her hair with that virtual background 😂
Bowles can't even get the date of his own trial right. Opening Statements in the Gutierrez trial was February 21.
Opening was on Feb 22nd i think
@@Zimmy123 It definitely was not the 28th. He doesn't even have the week right.
Cuomo kept interrupting Erlinda and it was so frustrating. I think all the scrolling and flashing was for visual interest to maximize views and attention. Not saying it’s aesthetic at all.
Although my opinion counts for naught beside that of Mrs. Rumple, I think the longer hair suits you. I hope the hairdresser doesn't take off too much.
God it’s so hot in Alberta / southern Alberta and it’s just getting hotter this week - :( not used to this heat need a/c asap
Question ⁉️ am I missing something ⁉️ if that due diligence is bad for your client are you still supposed to do it⁉️
Make sure to like👍 and share. Sharing is caring. 😁
Question: if they do a new trial do they have to follow the first trial exactly or can they change it up to improve certain things?
My understanding it’s a blank slate again however previous testimony can be used for impeachment of witnesses, defence can change their case theory
Wasn't it bolds the very Defence lawyer who didnt call Teske to testify. Teske told this to CST. So whether Morrissey knew or not doesnt matter if Boles didnt do a deep dive on what Teske knew or where he fit in the overall picture.
Live’s in my time zone are very exciting 🇬🇧
*cries in Australian*
I've got a feeling the judge has the inclination to grant this
Have you ever watched Public Enemies. It has a huge cast. Johnny Depp was in that. It’s really good. Some of that was filmed in my home town and neighboring area. Literally 5-7 minutes from my house. I almost got to meet Johnny Depp and Christian bale.
Post a link for a display case you would like for your coins!!!
2:18:00 Runkleism/example story.
Prosecutor Johnson resigned in the middle of Seth Kenny's testimony. The state's "star witness" delivered extremely sketchy testimony. Mrs. Johnson rode the waves of reasonable doubt right out the courtroom.
I thought Canada wanted to possess all the firearms.
*** BOOM ***
21:25: Could Guitierrez appeal on the grounds of infective council based on Bowels' failure to bring this evidence to light?
This evidence would actually be WORSE for her.
Replay crew 😊
She should be looking for a new trial due to ineffective council.
regarding the display for the challange coins....
i'm pretty sure, i think, that you happen to have a friend who is a woodworker.... hmmmm..... ??? 🤣🤣🤣
Can’t he sit on evidence if he wants?
It's really not necessary to waste half you commentary on the interview, complaining about format, screen layout and camera angles. It's completely irrelevant to the analysis.
Otherwise, interesting
It’s really not necessary to write pointlessly nit-picky comments like this. I loved those parts of it, your opinion is not everyone’s.
I doubt yours is either. In fact I know it's not
Yes, apparently she didn't get enough time at the old one.🙄
👋
Too bad Hannah didn't have the fortitude to walk off the set and quit like Erlinda did.
Can't believe everyone missed it, Rumple Can't believe you missed it too, a witness practically admitted he was the sourse of the live rifle rounds on the Witness stand.
Replay crew…I agree with Ian on Cuomo…he’s awful 🤮🤮🤮. Ian should watch Johnny Depp in Chocolat…. Such a good movie…and Mrs Runkle would probably love it also. 😊
I don’t like Baldwin. Why does it matter if anyone doesn’t like him. Everyone is allowed to their own opinion.
She's super cute!!
Her and the judge looked similar, just the judge older.
Live from Satans armpit… 😂😂😂😂😊
1. If you type "See moment Judge throws out case against Alec Baldwin" in search, you get CNN. So at least he wasn't saying go to job blow's flip phone recording of a screen. 2. Cuomo is the definition of a talking inflated head. 3. Those graphics are suppose hold your attention.
Yes, but he did not even mention CNN. It's a court document he needs to use a citation, especially with web references. What you suggest may work for a while, it is not permanent. The filing is part of a permanent record. What happens when someone needs to use the wayback machine? Even my own research it is frustrating... articles get moved so the link doesn't work, removed if it was a blog at times. I am now printing out the references as used because 5 years later 2/3 of them are gone, not easily retrieved.
@@annm9589 I know he should have put the citation and that the internet is not helping itself sometimes.. I was more just noting that at least he was referring to an actual news source. Although the title does imply it would be pointing out a specific event that caused the dismissal. Bit click baity.
Hang on Runkle with all due respect to you being adjunct professor or as we call them over here a T.A. Perhaps the defense guy didn't mention during sentencing or put into an appeal the information Morrisy disclosed on April 8th - because he didn't have time to verify, you'd probably go off on the guy if he had used it in either circumstance, you'd be calling it unverified information /evidence and a hail mary gambit. As to blaming corporal Russian lips for none disclosure - the prosecutor out ranks even a guppy lipped corporal, it would be a bit like your tenured professor blaming you for f___ups, the buck is supposed to land on the desk of the most senior officer and I'm pretty sure even a Special Prosecutor gets a ADA badge.