With all respect to Villa, a good battling side. I hope they go forward and can achieve what they set out to do. Forest have gone from strength to strength and have finally broke their 'Hoodoo's' which has bogged them down in the past. Much more clinical in the final 3rd with stability in midfield and a much improved back line. Villa have always been my 2nd team. Much respect to them but Forest always been my 1st....YOOOOU RŔRREEEEDSS!!!! 🔴⚪️
Nice one Ant. Personally I have never doubted him. He is a real talent and he needs to just keep working hard and things will fall into place for him and that is good news for us all at Forest. Great win! Yes the ref and VAR were nuts but we have had plenty go against us and cost us points so I will take things falling our way with glee tonight. COYR!
These are the VAR reviews and explanation extracted from ESPN, worthy of a look and thoughts: 1. Possible penalty: Challenge by Anderson on Rogers What happened: Morgan Rogers looked to run into the area in the 35th minute and went down after apparently being tugged back by Elliot Anderson. Referee Sam Barrott decided there was no significant impact on the Aston Villa player, and allowed play to continue as Anderson came away with the ball. VAR decision: No penalty. VAR review: We've had two similar situations this season, and perhaps that has created a precedent, whether that's the correct precedent is the real question. In September, West Ham United's Crysencio Summerville was having his arm held by Chelsea defender Wesley Fofana, and the word "fleeting" entered the Premier League lexicon as Stuart Attwell on VAR chose not to send the referee to the monitor. The KMI Panel voted 3-2 that it should have been given by the referee, but 4-1 against a VAR overturn. In October, Crystal Palace's Marc Guéhi appealed for a penalty for being held back by Liverpool's Virgil van Dijk. That was more "fleeting" and the KMI Panel supported no penalty on the field and through VAR. If a penalty had been awarded against Fofana, would Anderson have escaped his tug back on Rogers? The challenge by Anderson on Rogers is similar to that of Fofana, though arguably not as "fleeting." That said, had the VAR, John Brooks, decided that this was a penalty to Aston Villa, it's highly likely to have been canceled out as Rogers was strongly pulling Anderson's shirt first. The VAR decided Anderson hadn't fouled Rogers for the penalty, because the referee would have had to judge both offences at the monitor. Ergo, Barrott would have been sent to the screen for a penalty review but would also have been shown the initial foul by Rogers. In April, there was a monitor review for a penalty to Brighton against Brentford, but Lewis Dunk was shown to have fouled Yoane Wissa before Wissa pulled back Dunk, so the restart was a free kick to Brentford. Verdict: Precedent clearly must have a strong influence, and we've now had three examples of the arm being held that haven't been sent for review by the VAR. This was the clearest case of the three, and perhaps the way Rogers fell forward rather than backward influenced the VAR. Either way, because of the initial foul, Villa wouldn't have been given a penalty. 2. Possible disallowed goal: Challenge by Anderson on Cash What happened: Nottingham Forest won the game in the third minute of stoppage time, but was there a foul in the buildup by Anderson on Matty Cash? VAR decision: Goal stands. VAR review: It was a strong challenge by Anderson, but he gets his foot to the ball, so the goal isn't likely to be ruled out on review. Verdict: No VAR intervention. more info: www.espn.com/soccer/story/_/id/42964020/the-var-review-andrew-robertson-red-card-liverpool-wrong
Everyone had us relegated this year and I’m old enough to remember when the same things about Cloughies team I can’t see them bing there by the end of the season 2 years later and 2 European cups winners you never know I’m not saying we might do that again
Forest don't get above there station . Not like the so called top six have this expectation to finish always in the top six and win everything. Murphy.
Refs decisions didn’t effect the game because he refused to make any important decisions, VAR then went along with him apart from the offside which you could go either way ( it needs sorting the rules are daft) the penalty was nailed on anywhere else on the pitch a foul, a tackle from behind against cash and multiple cases of wrestlers all over the pitch. That said Villa struggle to see games out at the moment, we are not -2 goal difference for nothing. Unai will sort it I’m sure but top 6 will be tough if we don’t, forest going well but I’d be surprised if they stay top 6 too. All the teams from about twelfth are on +2 goal difference it will be tight.
Pundits aren't learning from the villa and Newcastle seasons. Danny quick tomsay he definitley doesn't see forest getting Champions league... i do. As a Villa fan i'm mlre worried about forest than I am the teams behind us.
Fantastic win for Forest. Got a lot of respect for Villa and hope we both get into Europe
Up the Villa and the Forest
Hold your head high Anthony elanga!! You made a massive impact, things will get better for you!
Well done Elanga… you have such a great talent, be confident in yourself…👏👏👏
With all respect to Villa, a good battling side. I hope they go forward and can achieve what they set out to do.
Forest have gone from strength to strength and have finally broke their 'Hoodoo's' which has bogged them down in the past. Much more clinical in the final 3rd with stability in midfield and a much improved back line. Villa have always been my 2nd team. Much respect to them but Forest always been my 1st....YOOOOU RŔRREEEEDSS!!!! 🔴⚪️
Im just happy we arnt fighting relegation ffs
ffs???
@@elliotkershaw3602 for fuchs sake
Unbelievable result coyr ❤
Nice one Ant. Personally I have never doubted him. He is a real talent and he needs to just keep working hard and things will fall into place for him and that is good news for us all at Forest. Great win! Yes the ref and VAR were nuts but we have had plenty go against us and cost us points so I will take things falling our way with glee tonight. COYR!
villa shud av had a clear pen to.
And a foul before the 2nd goal.
For who? doh
These are the VAR reviews and explanation extracted from ESPN, worthy of a look and thoughts:
1. Possible penalty: Challenge by Anderson on Rogers
What happened: Morgan Rogers looked to run into the area in the 35th minute and went down after apparently being tugged back by Elliot Anderson. Referee Sam Barrott decided there was no significant impact on the Aston Villa player, and allowed play to continue as Anderson came away with the ball.
VAR decision: No penalty.
VAR review:
We've had two similar situations this season, and perhaps that has created a precedent, whether that's the correct precedent is the real question.
In September, West Ham United's Crysencio Summerville was having his arm held by Chelsea defender Wesley Fofana, and the word "fleeting" entered the Premier League lexicon as Stuart Attwell on VAR chose not to send the referee to the monitor. The KMI Panel voted 3-2 that it should have been given by the referee, but 4-1 against a VAR overturn.
In October, Crystal Palace's Marc Guéhi appealed for a penalty for being held back by Liverpool's Virgil van Dijk. That was more "fleeting" and the KMI Panel supported no penalty on the field and through VAR. If a penalty had been awarded against Fofana, would Anderson have escaped his tug back on Rogers? The challenge by Anderson on Rogers is similar to that of Fofana, though arguably not as "fleeting." That said, had the VAR, John Brooks, decided that this was a penalty to Aston Villa, it's highly likely to have been canceled out as Rogers was strongly pulling Anderson's shirt first.
The VAR decided Anderson hadn't fouled Rogers for the penalty, because the referee would have had to judge both offences at the monitor. Ergo, Barrott would have been sent to the screen for a penalty review but would also have been shown the initial foul by Rogers.
In April, there was a monitor review for a penalty to Brighton against Brentford, but Lewis Dunk was shown to have fouled Yoane Wissa before Wissa pulled back Dunk, so the restart was a free kick to Brentford.
Verdict: Precedent clearly must have a strong influence, and we've now had three examples of the arm being held that haven't been sent for review by the VAR. This was the clearest case of the three, and perhaps the way Rogers fell forward rather than backward influenced the VAR. Either way, because of the initial foul, Villa wouldn't have been given a penalty.
2. Possible disallowed goal: Challenge by Anderson on Cash
What happened: Nottingham Forest won the game in the third minute of stoppage time, but was there a foul in the buildup by Anderson on Matty Cash?
VAR decision: Goal stands.
VAR review: It was a strong challenge by Anderson, but he gets his foot to the ball, so the goal isn't likely to be ruled out on review.
Verdict: No VAR intervention.
more info:
www.espn.com/soccer/story/_/id/42964020/the-var-review-andrew-robertson-red-card-liverpool-wrong
VAR were dogshite on both teams , clear pen and the offside just wow, And a world class save
Wrong
Congratulations to Forest for a hard-fought and hard-fought victory: securing a place in the Eurozone.
Everyone had us relegated this year and I’m old enough to remember when the same things about Cloughies team I can’t see them bing there by the end of the season 2 years later and 2 European cups winners you never know I’m not saying we might do that again
Box tick in the studio, Great win for Forest Though
Forest don't get above there station . Not like the so called top six have this expectation to finish always in the top six and win everything. Murphy.
Anthony Elanga,such a lovely humble lovely man ❤
Humble? He can't finish to save his life son, if he could he would be at Arsenal or City getting paid more kid.
Clark e do you even know what the word humble means ? ffs 😎
@@anthonymitchell8893 Haha!
NFFC ❤
Is it just me that only can see still shots of the replays?
Refs decisions didn’t effect the game because he refused to make any important decisions, VAR then went along with him apart from the offside which you could go either way ( it needs sorting the rules are daft) the penalty was nailed on anywhere else on the pitch a foul, a tackle from behind against cash and multiple cases of wrestlers all over the pitch. That said Villa struggle to see games out at the moment, we are not -2 goal difference for nothing. Unai will sort it I’m sure but top 6 will be tough if we don’t, forest going well but I’d be surprised if they stay top 6 too. All the teams from about twelfth are on +2 goal difference it will be tight.
Youuuuuu Reeeds!!!!!!!
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Pundits aren't learning from the villa and Newcastle seasons. Danny quick tomsay he definitley doesn't see forest getting Champions league... i do. As a Villa fan i'm mlre worried about forest than I am the teams behind us.
You carnt show goals in picture form
I guess anyone can be a football pundit
The English policeman from allo allo 😂😢😮
Anyone who says 'Anythink' shouldn't be commenting on anything/k
Kindly Subscribe, Like, Comment & Share, It's Free! ⚽⚽⚽
Danny Murphy 😂😂😂😂 1-0 forest
Martinez mistake cost us again
This AI is not too good.
He can't finish to save his life, if he could score more goals he would be at Man City or Arsenal!
He looks like the joker with joaguin phoenix
Salty Villa FC
ok til ai crap
FOREST ON FIRE….🔥🔥🔥🔥