Check out CyberGhost VPN at www.cyberghostvpn.com/MegaBuilds and you will get 84% off CyberGhost VPN. That's $2.03/month and 4 months free! It's risk-free with their 45-day money-back guarantee. Thanks to CyberGhostVPN for sponsoring the video! What do you think, which of these megaprojects should we actually build? 🤔
-the hyperlooop -the autonomos subway for cars in las vegas -the transport of cargo by rockets -a car without steering wheel, pedals and no manual way to open a car door from the inside what does all that have in common?
One Idea I saw regarding an Atlantic tunnel was to instead of going point-to-point from Great Britain to the North-Eastern United States, connect the two continents via the northern countries of Iceland, Greenland and Canada where they could in theory sacrifice time and directness for a lot more potential stops and passengers and theoretically less riskier to build and use thanks to the shallower seas and use of existing lands. Essentially it would go along the lines of: - Brussels to London via the Channel Tunnel (Brussels being the new "heart" of Europe in regards to railway connections). - London to Glasgow/Edinburgh, with possible stops around Manchester and Sheffield-Doncaster/Leeds for those wanting to be closer to the middle of the country. - Shoot off north-east before delving into an under sea tunnel taking the passengers to the Faroe Islands, saving costs via using the land briefly over there before returning to the seas until you reached Iceland and it's capital Rekjavik. -Another large underwater tunnel connecting Iceland to Greenland via the more shallow shelf and cutting through the land directly from east to west until you get to ther capital, Nuuk. - Straight across to Northern Canada, making a direct line south-west for Ottawa before finally making a turn to the North Eastern United States where it makes one of two more stops before finaly reaching New York City. It's a lot slower than London to New York direct, but it would theoretically be easier and safer to build and would have the added benefit of multiple countries being able to make good use of it without having to travel to London or New York City exclusively.
Build a underwater Bering Sea Tunnel ! Like the English channel tunnel from Britain to France, but only from Alaska to Russia! The water is shallow! HIGH speed rail between the 2 countries would literally cut out shipping on seas and the time delay across the Pacific! 👍
exactly why I just paused the video. then he proceeds talking about weight; well, you can just build beyond that point and create enough "lift" to make it "weightless," lol. edit: I fully didn't expect him to say exactly this just a tiny bit later, lol.
can we get the guy who made 2012 and moonfall to make a movie about a space elevator disaster next? when it snaps the "weight" starts spinning and the broken cable whips the earth each spin
@@slurker3788 They did pretty much that in the Foundation TV series. Except that it wasn't located on Earth, and it was destroyed by terrorists. But the results were pretty much what would happen if this happened here on (above?) earth. Did a pretty good job of showing how catastrophic a failed Space Elevator would be.
A far more plausible clean energy infrastructure project involving the Red Sea would be one similar to what was once proposed in the Severn Channel between England & Wales, a tidal dam where water is stored behind the dam at high tide and released at low tide to generate a modified form of hydroelectric power with a similar method.
The trans Atlantic tunnel would make more sense if it went Canada to Greenland to Iceland then England. The distances between land masses would be shorter and no underwater mountain range to deal with
Details, details. My criticism is that a space elevator is on the same list as trying to drain a sea that's a major navigational route. Nothing ridiculous about a bridge made out of graphine or whatever composite that can't yet be mass produced.
That cruise ship. Clearly, the designers have never lived aboard an aircraft carrier. An airport on top would keep everyone awake just from the landing gear impacts, let alone the engine noise. Hard pass.
The space elevator is really not a crazy idea. We don't nearly have the materials technology we would need to build it, but I believe one day earth will have one.
The higher the object the less stable it becomes in the wind. Go stack 100 Legos and lightly tap it and see how easy it falls compared to 3 Legos stacked. It would have to be extremely wide, maybe wider than a stadium. I'm sure and engineer would be better at explaining it. The truth is that if we could have done it, we would have done it already. You're not as smart as you think you are.
@@StallionFernando he literally says in his comment that we can't build it yet. Maybe get some better reading comprehension before you start questioning someone elses intelligence
@StallionFernando So basically you're saying that there will never be another invention or new technological development because if it was possible we would have done it already? Didn't your great, great, great, great, great, great grandfather say that in 1824?
While crazy, a Transatlantic tunnel still sounds like such a dream concept. I wouldn't want to be first onboard, but if we were ever able to achieve something like that we could kiss 12-14 hour plane rides goodbye.
Yeah, especially where it is connected. Two unstable countries on one side (Eritrea and Djibouti) and a country on the other side run by terrorists (Yemen.)
The song "I.G.Y" by Donals Fagan talked of a "undersea train" that could go from N.Y. to Paris in 90 minutes. It was an interesting concept to think about sitting in front of my stereo listening to my headphones when I was 12.😃
A long time ago, I was a telephone installer. We were installing a PBX system in a very tall building and using a shaft to route the huge cable up through the shaft. We were lowering this huge cable filled with wire and then I noticed that the outside plastic sheathing was starting to stretch. I yelled up to the boss and told him to stop immediately. He came down to see why I had him stop. This was before cell phones BTW. We ended up driving anchors into the shaft and staggering the cable as it descended through the tie off straps to alleviate all that weight on any portion of the cable and then later on we tied it down. With the expanse of any structure from space, the weight along with earths gravity would make any structure unfeasible to do. You wouldn’t have any shaft to anchor the structure to it and I wouldn’t want to be on the ground when that shaft came crashing down from the sheer weight of the entire structure. Add into this Mother Nature with severe weather patterns, this thing would be a disaster waiting to happen. If you had structural problems in the areas where there is no air, how do you affect repairs? Even a space suit wouldn’t work.
NASA has already done the research, its feasible we just can't quite make the carbon ribbons required yet. We can make them, but we can't make them long enough yet. There are competitions held with grant money to encourage work on the problem. Its been documented, research it.
Such a structure would interact with earths natural electromagnetic fields too. Think about it, why do we get cloud to ground lightning? Because a charge jumps between a buildup of negative energy in the lower troposphere and the positively charged ground. conversely you get lightning within the cloud between the negatively charged lower troposphere and the positively charged stratosphere. There are differences in charge like this all through the layers of the atmosphere right out into space, imagine what would happen if you ran wires between these differentials and the ground.
@@timbert4672 I'm sure the expert scientists and researchers who have spent time on this including at NASA have taken that into account. Most likely nothing would happen. Lightning occurs because a massive differential is allowed to build up over time. Running a wire up there so that it could continuously discharge and equalize would prevent the differential from building up. People do this every day in fact, this is why people ground themselves when working on sensitive electronics. Same principal.
If you ran a what is basically a giant metal pole between these charge differentials, you’d short circuit the entire planet. What the result would be I don’t know, but you know how powerful lightning is, hence me mentioning it. Perhaps steps could be taken to prevent it though, for example, encasing the structure in a non-conductive material. This is another example of why a moon based orbital tether would be easier, it wouldn’t have this issue.
The Freedom Ship concept appears to be DOA. I've been following that one for a long time, and the project's website hasn't updated anything significant for years. The video animations of the ship used in this video largely date from about 16 or 17 years ago (that's why the graphics look so poor). It was an intriguing idea, and one that I think might actually have had some potential, but unfortunately I don't think they ever got enough backing to establish a critical mass to put things into motion.
I remember first hearing the Freedom Ship in like Discovery Channel or so decades ago. Its a novel concept but its far from practical and would likely never be able to sustain itself. At best, it would need nuclear power to power its massive powertrain and the over all systems on the ship. Even then, the logistics to keep the Freedom Ship running independently are overwhelming, its like The Line but at sea.
The problem with your Red Sea dam. Is once you evaporate the water away you will not have the surface area to evaporate water quickly. A stream running from the Red Sea down isn't going to evaporate the power you need you need that surface area.
Although under current international law, all vessels in international waters are required to fly the flag and be under the sovereignty of an existing nation-state, which means unless it can defend itself against powerful navies, Freedom Ship and other libertarian microstates are highly unlikely to actually be free.
It would be easier to find an unoccupied island and pay the country that owns it a pile of money to create your own country. Still way cheaper than the ship. Besides there are already dozen of countries that have almost no taxes or oversight for the super rich.
I always loved the transatlantic tunnel project since I first saw it in an episode of extreme engineering more than 20 years ago. This is the most fascinating project I've ever seen. 😍
@@ClassicHarleyQuinn many challenges (besides current political tensions) length, depth of the waters, ice flows, winds, etc. The Confederation Bridge between P.E.I and New Brunswick has been a good exercise in some of the issues.
I watched the Freedom Ship documentary about 20 years ago. It was about a group of billionaires that wanted to purchase and island for themselves and instead came up with the ship concept.
I'd be horrified the first time an accident happened on that supersonic train. The Concorde crashed, and accidents always happen before any issue is fixed. I believe in Chaos Theory.
Libertarianism is great as long as you are young, rich, and healthy. If you do not fulfill one of these criteria, you are screwed in anarchocapitalist society.
@@MeanBeanComedy I think rich people don't want to be on a ship for too long either. Nobody wants to live in prison for long, even if the prison is nice.
1. Netherlands love to build dams on oceans and this is just XXXXXXXXL version of it. 2. There are some small fisherman villages fully on water on west pacific that are on water and people don't really needs to leave them. This is more modern version of it. 3. Human push for going as high and low as possible just leads up there. Once build we get simple way of going to our final border of earth. 4. Just a connection of aircraft carrier and luxury ships that don't really needs to stops in ports often. 5. Just another underwater tunnel like between France and UK. But XXXXXXXXL version of it.
I think a train to New York from London is not out of the question, because by adding only 800km, you can instead go via Glasgow/Edinburgh, Reykjavik, Nuuk and Montreal/Quebec, only requiring 3600km of underwater tracks instead of 5500km, making construction IMO significantly easier (as I believe the underwater sections will be much harder to construct), adding in more destinations making it more financially viable by utilising other country's GDPs to finance it and to make it more appealing to travellers who may not want to make the whole journey. It also means it can be operational before being fully constructed, eg. using a London to Reykjavik route while the North American portion is being built, which couldn't be done using a straight line across the Atlantic, helping it finance itself. Adding stops would significantly increase the journey time but using the other countries helps make it more viable
I remember when the discovery channel was massively popular on sky back in the 00s. The freedom ship was proposed on the show and remember I kept seeing it everywhere. Along with the bearing straight bridge and the millennium tower. Good old days before UA-cam and you also had future weapons with mac if anyone remembers that.
Only one of these projects makes since, and that is the Earth to space elevator. Most people don't understand the level of human advancements that comes from space and planetary exploration. The other projects will not advance human development nor effect most of humanity as an Earth to space elevator would.
I feel like the transatlantic tunnel could work if it went from northern Scotland to north eastern Canada via the Faroe Islands, Iceland and Greenland. It would save a lot of money because less actual tunnel would need to be constructed, the tunnel wouldn't have to be as deep in plenty of areas as the sea floor would be a lot higher and it could service more places than just London and New York, making it much more economically viable. The whole g-force acceleration problem could also be mitigated by making it fully automated and for cargo only, so no human passengers would be on any part of the train at any time. I was thinking a route that goes Thurso (UK - mainland) -> Kirkwall (UK - Orkney Islands) -> Lerwick (UK - Shetland Islands) -> Torshavn (Faroe Islands) -> Rekjavik (Iceland) -> Nuuk (Greenland) -> Somewhere on Baffin Island in Nunavut in Canada, and then maybe continuing on towards Montreal or Ottawa, with freight terminals at each location where cargo could be offloaded for local transportation. It would be a longer journey overall for any freight that would use it and potentially would require construction work in ecologically sensitive areas, but it could mean that we wouldn't have to do as much air freight and it would help make transatlantic freight transport a little more environmentally sustainable as you could run the entire system using renewable power. You could also potentially also build another one of these tunnels branching off from Lerwick to around where Bergen is in Norway, creating a link through the North Sea to the transatlantic system.
One of craziest mega projects I've heard of so far was proposed sometime back in the 50s or 60s as part of project plowshare (this was the U.S government's attempt to find peaceful uses for atomic bombs)and was dubbed the PanAtomic Canal. This would've been a second Panama Canal dug using a chain of underground nuclear explosions.
Another crazy project ......an engineer proposed to dam between James Bay and Hudson Bay in Northern Canada. Half of Ontario's, and Quebec, fresh water flows into James Bay so the salt water will eventually get replaced by fresh water. Then they would pump huge quantity of water towards the west of Canada for irrigation, along the way there would be hydro plants for electricity and only a small part of it would be used for the pumps.
I can't drive from Concord, NH to another state in 54 minutes. Even if we did have a train tunnel between the East coast of the United States and the United Kingdom, the trip would absolutely take longer than 54 minutes, simply because a trip spanning that distance would have at least some kind of delay.
"Right now, the fastest train in the world, IS the Shanghai MAGLEV, with a top speed of 460km/h" Laughing in French TGV at 560km/h and Japanese Shinkansen at 610km/h
Well, to be fair some of these are just thought experiments. And anyone who is "serious" about these concepts is more than likely a con artist. Or an idealist who has absolutely no idea about the practical realities of making these projects work.
Elevator on moon 15:20 through Earth-Moon Lagrange point would be oodles safer than a geostationary-Earth elevator. Latter vulnerable to missiles launched by naughty people, that might want kilometres of cable spaghetti on the ground.
8:30 I'm pretty sure they already have that in Kamurocho Edit: I was just shitposting. I did not expect him to show Kabuchiko (the area Kamurocho is based off of in the Yakuza series). Is this legitimately the Millennium Tower?
A tunnel between New York and London seems really inefficient. Theoretically I would have a train connecting New York and Toronto to Halifax, then going up Nova Scotia with a tunnel connecting to Newfoundland (presumably stopping at Saint Johns), then seeing about doing a tunnel into Western Ireland (Galway for example) then along the mainland to Dublin, across (or under) the Irish sea to Liverpool, then maybe hitting Manchester, Birmingham, Oxford, and finally London. It would be significantly slower but dramatically cheaper if we went to the easternmost point of North America. It could also serve more areas this way, although I'm not sure how fond of this idea the Irish may be. I don't know if the topography would be good for Maglev with this idea either or the exact latitude of Newfoundland compared to the British Isles (although i believe they're similar), but to me, it just makes the most sense to reduce the underwater time
I read about a large residential ship built in the '60s? '70s? The concept did not work & eventually it was scrapped. Worth remembering that the main use for large residential ships is as prison ships.
Yeah, ever since around the 1970s, certain libertarian types have been attempting to build and establish independent micronations in international waters. Lots of platforms have been proposed, including making existing cruise ships self sufficient in terms of food and power, floating artificial islands, oil-rig style structures, undersea habitats, etc. Fatal flaws of each of these proposals include the inability for the seastead proposals to handle the torture nature dishes out on the open ocean with the exception of the oil rig type ones, international law not allowing possible seasteads to be free to try libertarian governance systems (according to international law, all vessels in international waters are required to register with and follow the laws and taxes of an existing nation-state), and the problems attracting those rich enough to invest into such a project.
Yeah, ever since around the 1970s, certain libertarian types have been attempting to build and establish independent micronations in international waters. Lots of platforms have been proposed, including making existing cruise ships self sufficient in terms of food and power, floating artificial islands, oil-rig style structures, undersea habitats, etc. Fatal flaws of each of these proposals include the inability for the seastead proposals to handle the torture nature dishes out on the open ocean with the exception of the oil rig type ones, international law not allowing possible seasteads to be free to try libertarian governance systems (according to international law, all vessels in international waters are required to register with and follow the laws and taxes of an existing nation-state), and the problems attracting those rich enough to invest into such a project.
"Freedom Ship" I cannot imagine a worse living hell than being trapped on a floating petri dish with thousands of other people, captive animals and the toxic rich. Only someone who has forgotten COVID and the passengers floating off the coast, begging to disembark, would find this concept appealing. Anyone can easily envision such a floating cesspool of over entitled whiny humans if they have been within 20 feet of a cruise ship. A living hell.
I always wonder how they build such big things and compensate. For temperature changes, subsidence, continental drift. A datacable, you can at least give it some extra length on a loop. The cable won't mind. But a tunnel? A bridge? A pipeline between countries? It can be done, because they do it. To me it's a mystery.
The freedom ship the most realistic, we already build 300m floating hotel, just glue together 5 of them, and it's a 1500m ship, add more rows of 5 ships and you endup with a gigantic floating hotel, in theory.😁
Putting all the eggs in one basket is the thing that bothers me most. One single incident and everything comes to an hold. Travel to space blocked for half a year due to unplanned maintenance after a meteor strike? Transatlantic travel suspended for four years due to critical water leakages at multiple joints? I don‘t know…
The transatlantic tunnel would be a dream, but impossible. I just hope the bring back the BA Concorde. That was able to go from London to New York in just under 3 hours. They stopped it because of one accident that was not even because of the plane, but something on the runway caught the wheels. If they bring that back, then long flights would at least be half the time. So I hope they bring that back in the near future and I'd probably be able to travel to LA within 5 hours from England. Or the time it takes to get to new york right now, would be the same time to get to Hawaii
Floating city? I thought the whole thing about going on a boat was to experience the waves, the movement etc. with all these massive cruise ships you might as well stay home n save your money
"Freedom Ship" seems most plausible. A mega giant cruise ship with tax loopholes, and unrestricted regulations for a corporation to set up as a domicile. Then, you add various attractions for visitors. It could become financially sound. As for aircraft noise on the top deck, maybe this can be engineered to make it quiet. Trying to sail without flying a flag of a nation and have maritime insurance is a HUGE challenge. Flying a nation flag could kill corporate domicile laws for tax and regulation savings. On paper and regulations makes it a non-starter, not the tech. The other projects have tech issues making them non-starters. Maybe Bitcoiners need to look into creating an Anarcho-Capital state on the Freedom Ship.
What if instead of tunneling the entire width of the atlantic, you break it up into sections with a network of tunnels from London to The North of Scotland to The Faroes to Iceland to Greenland to North Canada down to New York. thus connecting Europe to North America. Seems like it would be further, but when you factor in the curvature of the earth. Similar to the flight paths, most planes take
The best mega project is to connect the Caspian Sea to the Arabian gulf through a channel. This channel will also be the new international border between Arabs and Persians thus stopping and halting the Iranian expansion and aggression through the Middle East.
number 1's koncept has come true in the 2015 sci-fi cartoon: Thunderbirds Are Go Episode - Hyperspeed. And as for number 2, it would interesting to make a comparisons of the freedom, to the arks in the movie "2012".
With the amount you'll pay to own a spot on the ship taxes would be cheaper. because running a ship that monstrous would be costly. Not including it never fit most docks around the world as the perfer many multi ships docked at once no one hogging the spot all for themselves.
I remember reading in a newspaper in the UK that there was an idea of connecting the UK to America with an underwater tunnel (Like the channel tunnel) It would have super speed trains and the journey would be an hour............ I got soooooooo excited........... But it never happened
It wouldn't be impossible to maintain that large of a ship, but it would be expensive! There'd have to be high monthly fees and other sufficient revenue sources.
If you want to build a maglev capable of making mincemeat of transatlantic distances, you might as well cross Siberia and be done with it. Only, don't waste engineering on going full vacuum - it'll cost way more than it'd be worth...
Check out CyberGhost VPN at www.cyberghostvpn.com/MegaBuilds and you will get 84% off CyberGhost VPN. That's $2.03/month and 4 months free! It's risk-free with their 45-day money-back guarantee.
Thanks to CyberGhostVPN for sponsoring the video!
What do you think, which of these megaprojects should we actually build? 🤔
-the hyperlooop
-the autonomos subway for cars in las vegas
-the transport of cargo by rockets
-a car without steering wheel, pedals and no manual way to open a car door from the inside
what does all that have in common?
Elon Musk, @@BrunoDias1234
It should be noted most of these are just thought experiments and neve actually meant to be done
The Mid-Atlantic Ridge is drawn in the video to be partially in the wrong place.
@@MegaBuildsYT None !! I'm going to Disney ,Hahaha
One Idea I saw regarding an Atlantic tunnel was to instead of going point-to-point from Great Britain to the North-Eastern United States, connect the two continents via the northern countries of Iceland, Greenland and Canada where they could in theory sacrifice time and directness for a lot more potential stops and passengers and theoretically less riskier to build and use thanks to the shallower seas and use of existing lands.
Essentially it would go along the lines of:
- Brussels to London via the Channel Tunnel (Brussels being the new "heart" of Europe in regards to railway connections).
- London to Glasgow/Edinburgh, with possible stops around Manchester and Sheffield-Doncaster/Leeds for those wanting to be closer to the middle of the country.
- Shoot off north-east before delving into an under sea tunnel taking the passengers to the Faroe Islands, saving costs via using the land briefly over there before returning to the seas until you reached Iceland and it's capital Rekjavik.
-Another large underwater tunnel connecting Iceland to Greenland via the more shallow shelf and cutting through the land directly from east to west until you get to ther capital, Nuuk.
- Straight across to Northern Canada, making a direct line south-west for Ottawa before finally making a turn to the North Eastern United States where it makes one of two more stops before finaly reaching New York City.
It's a lot slower than London to New York direct, but it would theoretically be easier and safer to build and would have the added benefit of multiple countries being able to make good use of it without having to travel to London or New York City exclusively.
add on top of this cargo trains and project starts to be economically feasible
not alot of passengers up in canada greenland and iceland tho lol
Hell, why not go from Britain to Iceland to Greenland to Canada to US?
😂😊
Build a underwater Bering Sea Tunnel ! Like the English channel tunnel from Britain to France, but only from Alaska to Russia! The water is shallow! HIGH speed rail between the 2 countries would literally cut out shipping on seas and the time delay across the Pacific! 👍
12:00 the geostationary orbit is about 36000km above the ground, not 36km
exactly why I just paused the video.
then he proceeds talking about weight; well, you can just build beyond that point and create enough "lift" to make it "weightless," lol.
edit: I fully didn't expect him to say exactly this just a tiny bit later, lol.
can we get the guy who made 2012 and moonfall to make a movie about a space elevator disaster next? when it snaps the "weight" starts spinning and the broken cable whips the earth each spin
@@slurker3788 They did pretty much that in the Foundation TV series. Except that it wasn't located on Earth, and it was destroyed by terrorists. But the results were pretty much what would happen if this happened here on (above?) earth. Did a pretty good job of showing how catastrophic a failed Space Elevator would be.
Just paused the video to comment the same thing 🤣
@@timbeaton5045remember the hundreds of millions dead on trantor because of the hubris that was the skybridge.
A far more plausible clean energy infrastructure project involving the Red Sea would be one similar to what was once proposed in the Severn Channel between England & Wales, a tidal dam where water is stored behind the dam at high tide and released at low tide to generate a modified form of hydroelectric power with a similar method.
The trans Atlantic tunnel would make more sense if it went Canada to Greenland to Iceland then England. The distances between land masses would be shorter and no underwater mountain range to deal with
12:00 not 36 km, but 36,000 km for geostatonary. But what’s an order of magnitude or three among friends?
Details, details. My criticism is that a space elevator is on the same list as trying to drain a sea that's a major navigational route. Nothing ridiculous about a bridge made out of graphine or whatever composite that can't yet be mass produced.
I agree.
Embarrassing mistake…
The Red Sea dam would be blown up so quick
That cruise ship. Clearly, the designers have never lived aboard an aircraft carrier. An airport on top would keep everyone awake just from the landing gear impacts, let alone the engine noise. Hard pass.
Clearly they should go for the superior 'Black Whale' design
If they make them work all day, they'll sleep. What kind of ship was this? 😂
Indeed, plus that luxury sell would probably equal a pass from many investors.
@timbert4672 If they got launch jets..
I don't think the planes will fly there constantly, maybe 1 flight a day.
The space elevator is really not a crazy idea. We don't nearly have the materials technology we would need to build it, but I believe one day earth will have one.
Like in megaman
The higher the object the less stable it becomes in the wind. Go stack 100 Legos and lightly tap it and see how easy it falls compared to 3 Legos stacked. It would have to be extremely wide, maybe wider than a stadium. I'm sure and engineer would be better at explaining it. The truth is that if we could have done it, we would have done it already. You're not as smart as you think you are.
@@StallionFernando he literally says in his comment that we can't build it yet. Maybe get some better reading comprehension before you start questioning someone elses intelligence
@@MrGoesBoom ty! 😂
@StallionFernando
So basically you're saying that there will never be another invention or new technological development because if it was possible we would have done it already?
Didn't your great, great, great, great, great, great grandfather say that in 1824?
11:32 to skip the ad
The Atlantic tunnel would follow the great arc, not the line shown on the map in the video.
It seems to be a map projection issue.
While crazy, a Transatlantic tunnel still sounds like such a dream concept. I wouldn't want to be first onboard, but if we were ever able to achieve something like that we could kiss 12-14 hour plane rides goodbye.
The red sea dam is hilarious!
Yeah, especially where it is connected. Two unstable countries on one side (Eritrea and Djibouti) and a country on the other side run by terrorists (Yemen.)
The song "I.G.Y" by Donals Fagan talked of a "undersea train" that could go from N.Y. to Paris in 90 minutes. It was an interesting concept to think about sitting in front of my stereo listening to my headphones when I was 12.😃
A long time ago, I was a telephone installer. We were installing a PBX system in a very tall building and using a shaft to route the huge cable up through the shaft. We were lowering this huge cable filled with wire and then I noticed that the outside plastic sheathing was starting to stretch. I yelled up to the boss and told him to stop immediately. He came down to see why I had him stop. This was before cell phones BTW. We ended up driving anchors into the shaft and staggering the cable as it descended through the tie off straps to alleviate all that weight on any portion of the cable and then later on we tied it down.
With the expanse of any structure from space, the weight along with earths gravity would make any structure unfeasible to do. You wouldn’t have any shaft to anchor the structure to it and I wouldn’t want to be on the ground when that shaft came crashing down from the sheer weight of the entire structure. Add into this Mother Nature with severe weather patterns, this thing would be a disaster waiting to happen. If you had structural problems in the areas where there is no air, how do you affect repairs? Even a space suit wouldn’t work.
Yes that's why it would have to taper and also why we need better carbon technology to make it work.
NASA has already done the research, its feasible we just can't quite make the carbon ribbons required yet. We can make them, but we can't make them long enough yet. There are competitions held with grant money to encourage work on the problem. Its been documented, research it.
Such a structure would interact with earths natural electromagnetic fields too. Think about it, why do we get cloud to ground lightning? Because a charge jumps between a buildup of negative energy in the lower troposphere and the positively charged ground. conversely you get lightning within the cloud between the negatively charged lower troposphere and the positively charged stratosphere. There are differences in charge like this all through the layers of the atmosphere right out into space, imagine what would happen if you ran wires between these differentials and the ground.
@@timbert4672 I'm sure the expert scientists and researchers who have spent time on this including at NASA have taken that into account. Most likely nothing would happen. Lightning occurs because a massive differential is allowed to build up over time. Running a wire up there so that it could continuously discharge and equalize would prevent the differential from building up. People do this every day in fact, this is why people ground themselves when working on sensitive electronics. Same principal.
If you ran a what is basically a giant metal pole between these charge differentials, you’d short circuit the entire planet. What the result would be I don’t know, but you know how powerful lightning is, hence me mentioning it. Perhaps steps could be taken to prevent it though, for example, encasing the structure in a non-conductive material. This is another example of why a moon based orbital tether would be easier, it wouldn’t have this issue.
The Freedom Ship concept appears to be DOA. I've been following that one for a long time, and the project's website hasn't updated anything significant for years. The video animations of the ship used in this video largely date from about 16 or 17 years ago (that's why the graphics look so poor). It was an intriguing idea, and one that I think might actually have had some potential, but unfortunately I don't think they ever got enough backing to establish a critical mass to put things into motion.
I remember first hearing the Freedom Ship in like Discovery Channel or so decades ago. Its a novel concept but its far from practical and would likely never be able to sustain itself. At best, it would need nuclear power to power its massive powertrain and the over all systems on the ship. Even then, the logistics to keep the Freedom Ship running independently are overwhelming, its like The Line but at sea.
Should have renamed this one Pipe Dreams.
Pipe Dreams, that was a fun trick heaven in SSX: Tricky, so many half-pipes to blast off of on your snowboard! 🏂
huh
The problem with your Red Sea dam. Is once you evaporate the water away you will not have the surface area to evaporate water quickly. A stream running from the Red Sea down isn't going to evaporate the power you need you need that surface area.
The Freedom Ship might be realistic. For the mega rich it might be tempting to live on international waters and not pay taxes anywhere.
Rich still pay taxes on where they profit
Not in it's current for maybe, but a scaled down version is both doable and attractive enough to the right people with the right kind of money...
Although under current international law, all vessels in international waters are required to fly the flag and be under the sovereignty of an existing nation-state, which means unless it can defend itself against powerful navies, Freedom Ship and other libertarian microstates are highly unlikely to actually be free.
I’ll just change my name to Blackbeard and call my ship the Queen Anne’s revenge, and then go crash the party
It would be easier to find an unoccupied island and pay the country that owns it a pile of money to create your own country. Still way cheaper than the ship. Besides there are already dozen of countries that have almost no taxes or oversight for the super rich.
I always loved the transatlantic tunnel project since I first saw it in an episode of extreme engineering more than 20 years ago. This is the most fascinating project I've ever seen. 😍
It's where Elon copied the Hyperloop from
Jeremy Clarkson, James May and Richard Hammond would have these built in no time. 😂
How long would it take James to cross it if he was driving?
@jeffroussell too long.
@@ClassicHarleyQuinn many challenges (besides current political tensions) length, depth of the waters, ice flows, winds, etc. The Confederation Bridge between P.E.I and New Brunswick has been a good exercise in some of the issues.
17:47 Did anybody else notice they got the location of Rio de Janeiro wrong?
This channel is filled with inaccuracies.
That Aral Sea story is really fucking depressing
Wouldn’t a space elevator just be the biggest tower in the world?
The tunnel across the Atlantic Ocean is a bad dream for so many reasons.
The ship sounds like an absolute nightmare
Also Suez Canal would kill international shipping.
He said that
Megabuilds never fails to make a good video, keep up the good work)
12:41 Amazing how the Earth rotates while the Space Elevator stands still, that way it could serve several different nations, not just one.
/sarcasm
underwater train tunnel sounds incredible but id absolutely never got on that 😂
0:42 Moses: Hold my beer.
Reed Sea*
Placing the Atlantic tunnel to an island isn't a smart move at all. It should go to Portugal Spain
That Tokyo Bay city idea is cool on so many levels. Like a modern-day Venice but far more awesome.
I watched the Freedom Ship documentary about 20 years ago. It was about a group of billionaires that wanted to purchase and island for themselves and instead came up with the ship concept.
I vaguely remember that Arthur C. Clarke proposed space elevators back in the 1960's.
Instead of NextTokio, they need to build Tokio-3 )
I've always thought that we should flood the Caspian Sea to lower sea levels. Could generate power too. Much smaller and faster to implement.
How?
Oh no an underwater hyper loop. I’m sure that will work
I'd be horrified the first time an accident happened on that supersonic train. The Concorde crashed, and accidents always happen before any issue is fixed. I believe in Chaos Theory.
How many accidents ever happened on maglev trains? It would be a maglev in a reduced pressure tube so that it can travel at 4000kmh...
That’s not what chaos theory means…
@@shao-yuwang1440 Hey, watch it. OP saw Jurassic Park, so he knows what he's on about.
Who would want to live on the freedom ship
A trump ship!
Libertarianism is great as long as you are young, rich, and healthy. If you do not fulfill one of these criteria, you are screwed in anarchocapitalist society.
Rich people, wealthy people, and well-off people.
@@CZpersiConflating two very different ideologies there.
@@MeanBeanComedy I think rich people don't want to be on a ship for too long either. Nobody wants to live in prison for long, even if the prison is nice.
Why are these so random yet they KINDA make sense???💀🙏
Because someday we actually heading there.
1. Netherlands love to build dams on oceans and this is just XXXXXXXXL version of it.
2. There are some small fisherman villages fully on water on west pacific that are on water and people don't really needs to leave them. This is more modern version of it.
3. Human push for going as high and low as possible just leads up there. Once build we get simple way of going to our final border of earth.
4. Just a connection of aircraft carrier and luxury ships that don't really needs to stops in ports often.
5. Just another underwater tunnel like between France and UK. But XXXXXXXXL version of it.
"freedom ship" = biggest jail on planet.
Pure Insanity
I couldn't agree more! Horror!
Yeah, well, not a bad idea in regards to prison population.That depends on the inmates.
It sound like literal hell
Megabuilds always makes a great video
I think a train to New York from London is not out of the question, because by adding only 800km, you can instead go via Glasgow/Edinburgh, Reykjavik, Nuuk and Montreal/Quebec, only requiring 3600km of underwater tracks instead of 5500km, making construction IMO significantly easier (as I believe the underwater sections will be much harder to construct), adding in more destinations making it more financially viable by utilising other country's GDPs to finance it and to make it more appealing to travellers who may not want to make the whole journey. It also means it can be operational before being fully constructed, eg. using a London to Reykjavik route while the North American portion is being built, which couldn't be done using a straight line across the Atlantic, helping it finance itself. Adding stops would significantly increase the journey time but using the other countries helps make it more viable
I remember when the discovery channel was massively popular on sky back in the 00s. The freedom ship was proposed on the show and remember I kept seeing it everywhere. Along with the bearing straight bridge and the millennium tower. Good old days before UA-cam and you also had future weapons with mac if anyone remembers that.
Only one of these projects makes since, and that is the Earth to space elevator. Most people don't understand the level of human advancements that comes from space and planetary exploration. The other projects will not advance human development nor effect most of humanity as an Earth to space elevator would.
If a space elevator breaks and falls- that’s the end of multiple cities in a thousands mile path around the globe.
I feel like the transatlantic tunnel could work if it went from northern Scotland to north eastern Canada via the Faroe Islands, Iceland and Greenland. It would save a lot of money because less actual tunnel would need to be constructed, the tunnel wouldn't have to be as deep in plenty of areas as the sea floor would be a lot higher and it could service more places than just London and New York, making it much more economically viable. The whole g-force acceleration problem could also be mitigated by making it fully automated and for cargo only, so no human passengers would be on any part of the train at any time.
I was thinking a route that goes Thurso (UK - mainland) -> Kirkwall (UK - Orkney Islands) -> Lerwick (UK - Shetland Islands) -> Torshavn (Faroe Islands) -> Rekjavik (Iceland) -> Nuuk (Greenland) -> Somewhere on Baffin Island in Nunavut in Canada, and then maybe continuing on towards Montreal or Ottawa, with freight terminals at each location where cargo could be offloaded for local transportation. It would be a longer journey overall for any freight that would use it and potentially would require construction work in ecologically sensitive areas, but it could mean that we wouldn't have to do as much air freight and it would help make transatlantic freight transport a little more environmentally sustainable as you could run the entire system using renewable power.
You could also potentially also build another one of these tunnels branching off from Lerwick to around where Bergen is in Norway, creating a link through the North Sea to the transatlantic system.
need part 2 😛
23:33 - So... HyperLoop?
One of craziest mega projects I've heard of so far was proposed sometime back in the 50s or 60s as part of project plowshare (this was the U.S government's attempt to find peaceful uses for atomic bombs)and was dubbed the PanAtomic Canal. This would've been a second Panama Canal dug using a chain of underground nuclear explosions.
Another crazy project ......an engineer proposed to dam between James Bay and Hudson Bay in Northern Canada. Half of Ontario's, and Quebec, fresh water flows into James Bay so the salt water will eventually get replaced by fresh water. Then they would pump huge quantity of water towards the west of Canada for irrigation, along the way there would be hydro plants for electricity and only a small part of it would be used for the pumps.
I can't drive from Concord, NH to another state in 54 minutes.
Even if we did have a train tunnel between the East coast of the United States and the United Kingdom, the trip would absolutely take longer than 54 minutes, simply because a trip spanning that distance would have at least some kind of delay.
"Right now, the fastest train in the world, IS the Shanghai MAGLEV, with a top speed of 460km/h"
Laughing in French TGV at 560km/h and Japanese Shinkansen at 610km/h
A tunnel to America would have been amazing.
"but what do you think?"
uhu, because we as random internet experts really have some valuable opinions compared to all these scientists combined.
Well, to be fair some of these are just thought experiments. And anyone who is "serious" about these concepts is more than likely a con artist. Or an idealist who has absolutely no idea about the practical realities of making these projects work.
You forget the dam of the Mediterranean Sea 😊
we can't even build a train to and from LAX airport
Tunnel under Las Vegas is a joke This is a pipe dream
Elevator on moon 15:20 through Earth-Moon Lagrange point would be oodles safer than a geostationary-Earth elevator. Latter vulnerable to missiles launched by naughty people, that might want kilometres of cable spaghetti on the ground.
A tunnel from America to Europe would be most efficient to go through Canada Newfoundland to Greenland to Iceland and over to Norway
Think of all the volcanoes one could enjoy.
@@stephengordon4081 🤣 Yeah, no need for heating, eh.
8:30 I'm pretty sure they already have that in Kamurocho
Edit: I was just shitposting. I did not expect him to show Kabuchiko (the area Kamurocho is based off of in the Yakuza series). Is this legitimately the Millennium Tower?
21:12 this will not work, they have to deal with the mid Atlantic ridge, which is volcanically active and spreading with earthquakes too
Why? Why not go from coast of norway, faroe, iceland, groenland, canada ?
@@mycardbrokedown5699 same thing applies. it won't ever happen as the earths crust is moving. the tunnel would'nt last long enough to connect .🤣
@madb132 take a look at a map vefore you talk...
A tunnel between New York and London seems really inefficient.
Theoretically I would have a train connecting New York and Toronto to Halifax, then going up Nova Scotia with a tunnel connecting to Newfoundland (presumably stopping at Saint Johns), then seeing about doing a tunnel into Western Ireland (Galway for example) then along the mainland to Dublin, across (or under) the Irish sea to Liverpool, then maybe hitting Manchester, Birmingham, Oxford, and finally London.
It would be significantly slower but dramatically cheaper if we went to the easternmost point of North America. It could also serve more areas this way, although I'm not sure how fond of this idea the Irish may be. I don't know if the topography would be good for Maglev with this idea either or the exact latitude of Newfoundland compared to the British Isles (although i believe they're similar), but to me, it just makes the most sense to reduce the underwater time
I read about a large residential ship built in the '60s? '70s? The concept did not work & eventually it was scrapped. Worth remembering that the main use for large residential ships is as prison ships.
Yeah, ever since around the 1970s, certain libertarian types have been attempting to build and establish independent micronations in international waters. Lots of platforms have been proposed, including making existing cruise ships self sufficient in terms of food and power, floating artificial islands, oil-rig style structures, undersea habitats, etc. Fatal flaws of each of these proposals include the inability for the seastead proposals to handle the torture nature dishes out on the open ocean with the exception of the oil rig type ones, international law not allowing possible seasteads to be free to try libertarian governance systems (according to international law, all vessels in international waters are required to register with and follow the laws and taxes of an existing nation-state), and the problems attracting those rich enough to invest into such a project.
Yeah, ever since around the 1970s, certain libertarian types have been attempting to build and establish independent micronations in international waters. Lots of platforms have been proposed, including making existing cruise ships self sufficient in terms of food and power, floating artificial islands, oil-rig style structures, undersea habitats, etc. Fatal flaws of each of these proposals include the inability for the seastead proposals to handle the torture nature dishes out on the open ocean with the exception of the oil rig type ones, international law not allowing possible seasteads to be free to try libertarian governance systems (according to international law, all vessels in international waters are required to register with and follow the laws and taxes of an existing nation-state), and the problems attracting those rich enough to invest into such a project.
A lot of pipe dreams for sure. There are too many perilous obstacles to overcome before we could ever build and use such things safely.
Thanks!
Vacuum tube under outside pressure 😂
What could go wrong 😂
"Freedom Ship" I cannot imagine a worse living hell than being trapped on a floating petri dish with thousands of other people, captive animals and the toxic rich.
Only someone who has forgotten COVID and the passengers floating off the coast, begging to disembark, would find this concept appealing. Anyone can easily envision such a floating cesspool of over entitled whiny humans if they have been within 20 feet of a cruise ship. A living hell.
Who hurt you?
@@max5183 The last cruise ship! 🤣🤣
Space Elevator: I'm sure nothing would go wrong.
The common problem that all five of these projects have relates to warfare/terrorism and Mother Nature.
It took 20 years and $billions in overruns to finish the Big Dig in Boston.
How would a transatlantic tunnel deal with the fact that the Atlantic is getting wider all the time?
It's a shame Stockton Rush is gone. I'm sure he would have some great ideas to cut costs for The Transatlantic Tunnel.
Why is The Line not on this list...
The Red Sea dam is still less insane than the Mediterranean dam.
350 years to start energy production on the dame should be a deal breaker. the infrastructure will rot before then
You forgot the craziest project of them all, Atlantropa, the project to drain the Mediterranean sea.
RIGHT!!
He already made a video about it ua-cam.com/video/9kd5feloqSU/v-deo.htmlsi=OLzcR7X80pCUO7qe
I always wonder how they build such big things and compensate. For temperature changes, subsidence, continental drift. A datacable, you can at least give it some extra length on a loop. The cable won't mind.
But a tunnel? A bridge? A pipeline between countries? It can be done, because they do it. To me it's a mystery.
The freedom ship the most realistic, we already build 300m floating hotel, just glue together 5 of them, and it's a 1500m ship, add more rows of 5 ships and you endup with a gigantic floating hotel, in theory.😁
Putting all the eggs in one basket is the thing that bothers me most. One single incident and everything comes to an hold. Travel to space blocked for half a year due to unplanned maintenance after a meteor strike? Transatlantic travel suspended for four years due to critical water leakages at multiple joints? I don‘t know…
👋 hey 👋 megabuilds 😊
I literally came up with the idea for the space elevator when I was eight. And even then I realized I was being silly.
0:16, it how about, an explanation why anyone from London would want to go to New York.
They are both overcrowded, overpriced and overhyped. They would feel at home
The transatlantic tunnel would be a dream, but impossible. I just hope the bring back the BA Concorde. That was able to go from London to New York in just under 3 hours. They stopped it because of one accident that was not even because of the plane, but something on the runway caught the wheels. If they bring that back, then long flights would at least be half the time. So I hope they bring that back in the near future and I'd probably be able to travel to LA within 5 hours from England. Or the time it takes to get to new york right now, would be the same time to get to Hawaii
BTW: It is Centripetal not Centrifugal that acts on the satellite
That commercial break killed it for me.
Haha geostationary orbit 36 kilometers above Earth. That’s a little more than one tenth of the altitude of the space station.
the wandering earth 2 space elevator is more realistic
Halo has space elevatorS and they look so cool.... that's also 500yrs in the future.
Floating city? I thought the whole thing about going on a boat was to experience the waves, the movement etc. with all these massive cruise ships you might as well stay home n save your money
"Freedom Ship" seems most plausible. A mega giant cruise ship with tax loopholes, and unrestricted regulations for a corporation to set up as a domicile. Then, you add various attractions for visitors. It could become financially sound. As for aircraft noise on the top deck, maybe this can be engineered to make it quiet. Trying to sail without flying a flag of a nation and have maritime insurance is a HUGE challenge. Flying a nation flag could kill corporate domicile laws for tax and regulation savings. On paper and regulations makes it a non-starter, not the tech. The other projects have tech issues making them non-starters. Maybe Bitcoiners need to look into creating an Anarcho-Capital state on the Freedom Ship.
That definitely a "great stuff🚬" if someone proposed outlandish idea😂
What if instead of tunneling the entire width of the atlantic, you break it up into sections with a network of tunnels from London to The North of Scotland to The Faroes to Iceland to Greenland to North Canada down to New York. thus connecting Europe to North America. Seems like it would be further, but when you factor in the curvature of the earth. Similar to the flight paths, most planes take
What about the proposal to dam the Mediterranean Sea? Atlantropa
The best mega project is to connect the Caspian Sea to the Arabian gulf through a channel. This channel will also be the new international border between Arabs and Persians thus stopping and halting the Iranian expansion and aggression through the Middle East.
number 1's koncept has come true in the 2015 sci-fi cartoon: Thunderbirds Are Go Episode - Hyperspeed.
And as for number 2, it would interesting to make a comparisons of the freedom, to the arks in the movie "2012".
The big push for that freedom of the sea is being able to get out of paying taxes thus the reason they'll run port to port
With the amount you'll pay to own a spot on the ship taxes would be cheaper. because running a ship that monstrous would be costly. Not including it never fit most docks around the world as the perfer many multi ships docked at once no one hogging the spot all for themselves.
I remember reading in a newspaper in the UK that there was an idea of connecting the UK to America with an underwater tunnel (Like the channel tunnel)
It would have super speed trains and the journey would be an hour............ I got soooooooo excited........... But it never happened
Good luck maintaining such a huge ship
It wouldn't be impossible to maintain that large of a ship, but it would be expensive! There'd have to be high monthly fees and other sufficient revenue sources.
If you want to build a maglev capable of making mincemeat of transatlantic distances, you might as well cross Siberia and be done with it. Only, don't waste engineering on going full vacuum - it'll cost way more than it'd be worth...
As for Freedom Ship, just buy an aircraft carrier and convert it to a passenger ship with an airport.